Those who abused the powers of the independent agencies brought judgement upon themselves. What we're seeing is the result of past abuses catching up to the greedy. Trump has grabbed a whip and has started driving out the thieves in the DEN OF CROOKS.
You should be disturbed by this instead of happy. But clearly you hate America so much that you yearn for it's destruction at the hands of a narcistic megalomaniacal moron. There is something deeply wrong with you. Aside from your adherence to White Supremacy.
Copilot: The Monroe doctrine was framed as a protective measure for the Americas, but over time, it was often used to justify U.S. interventions in Latin America. Critics argue that it became a tool for American imperialism, despite its original anti-colonial intent.
Applying the Monroe Doctrine to Greenland is a stretch. Greenland, a Danish territory, is located in the North Atlantic and geographically isn't part of the Americas. Historically, the Monroe Doctrine's scope was aimed at the Western Hemisphere -- North, Central, and South America. Extending its coverage to Greenland would go beyond the doctrine's original intent and geographical boundaries.
I don't know, Greenland sounds like a Monroe doctrinesque free- trade to me... getting Europe (Denmark) out of North America, and by the US leaving NATO, getting America out of Europe.
Copilot: The blog author seems to be interpreting the Monroe Doctrine in a very expansive way, tying it to modern geopolitical moves like acquiring Greenland and leaving NATO. The Monroe Doctrine originally focused on opposing European colonialism in the Americas, but this interpretation stretches it to advocate for removing European influence (like Denmark's connection to Greenland) from North America and disentangling the U.S. from European alliances like NATO.
The idea of making Greenland part of the U.S. ... would face significant political, legal, and cultural hurdles, not least because Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark with its own identity and autonomy.
As for leaving NATO, this aligns with a more isolationist or "America First" perspective, which some argue is a modern echo of the Monroe Doctrine's focus on hemispheric independence. However, leaving NATO would have profound implications for global security and U.S. alliances, making it a highly controversial stance.
The blog author's perspective is certainly provocative, but it raises questions about how historical doctrines like Monroe's can be reinterpreted -- or perhaps misinterpreted -- in today's context.
...and in order for myths like the Monroe Doctrine (or Manifest Destiny) to remain alive and relevant, they must constantly be reinterpreted. Call it the "oral tradition' in storytelling.
"Support for Greenland joining the United States appears to be quite low. A January poll conducted by Verian found that only about 6% of Greenlanders supported annexation by the U.S., while 85% opposed it, and 9% were undecided. This aligns with the general sentiment in Greenland, where the focus tends to be on either maintaining their current semi-autonomous status under Denmark or pursuing full independence".
Piss off, Mystere. If Minus wants to ban me from his blog as you have banned me from your blog, he can do that. You have no authority to ban commenters from other people's blogs, dipsh!t.
20 comments:
Those who abused the powers of the independent agencies brought judgement upon themselves. What we're seeing is the result of past abuses catching up to the greedy. Trump has grabbed a whip and has started driving out the thieves in the DEN OF CROOKS.
BS.
Is d0n0ld going to drive himself out, Mystere? He's the biggest thief of all.
You missed the king, now you'll pay the consequences... :)
You should be disturbed by this instead of happy. But clearly you hate America so much that you yearn for it's destruction at the hands of a narcistic megalomaniacal moron. There is something deeply wrong with you. Aside from your adherence to White Supremacy.
How is being happy at the end of American Imperialistic ambitions megalomaniacal? You're projecting again, Derv, especially vis "white supremacy".
king d0n0ld on Greenland: One way or the other, we will have it.
king d0n0ld on Canada: ...the only thing that makes sense is for Canada to become our cherished Fifty First State.
King d0n0ld on the Panama Canal: My administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal, and we’ve already started doing it.
THIS is the "end" of Imperialistic ambitions? Sounds like the beginning of Imperialistic ambitions to me.
btw, me calling out your love for White Supremacy is definitely not projection. I strongly oppose White Supremacy.
also, it looks like you are agreeing that d0n0ld is a narcissist and a moron. Given that you only disagreed with him being a megalomaniac.
Sounds more like the anti-imperialism of the Monroe Doctrine.
Copilot: The Monroe doctrine was framed as a protective measure for the Americas, but over time, it was often used to justify U.S. interventions in Latin America. Critics argue that it became a tool for American imperialism, despite its original anti-colonial intent.
Applying the Monroe Doctrine to Greenland is a stretch. Greenland, a Danish territory, is located in the North Atlantic and geographically isn't part of the Americas. Historically, the Monroe Doctrine's scope was aimed at the Western Hemisphere -- North, Central, and South America. Extending its coverage to Greenland would go beyond the doctrine's original intent and geographical boundaries.
I don't know, Greenland sounds like a Monroe doctrinesque free- trade to me... getting Europe (Denmark) out of North America, and by the US leaving NATO, getting America out of Europe.
Copilot: The blog author seems to be interpreting the Monroe Doctrine in a very expansive way, tying it to modern geopolitical moves like acquiring Greenland and leaving NATO. The Monroe Doctrine originally focused on opposing European colonialism in the Americas, but this interpretation stretches it to advocate for removing European influence (like Denmark's connection to Greenland) from North America and disentangling the U.S. from European alliances like NATO.
The idea of making Greenland part of the U.S. ... would face significant political, legal, and cultural hurdles, not least because Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark with its own identity and autonomy.
As for leaving NATO, this aligns with a more isolationist or "America First" perspective, which some argue is a modern echo of the Monroe Doctrine's focus on hemispheric independence. However, leaving NATO would have profound implications for global security and U.S. alliances, making it a highly controversial stance.
The blog author's perspective is certainly provocative, but it raises questions about how historical doctrines like Monroe's can be reinterpreted -- or perhaps misinterpreted -- in today's context.
Dervish has been sniffing Hintern Bidet's crack again, begging for a bigly Bidet stinkface.
There are many autonomous US Territories. Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.
...and in order for myths like the Monroe Doctrine (or Manifest Destiny) to remain alive and relevant, they must constantly be reinterpreted. Call it the "oral tradition' in storytelling.
"Support for Greenland joining the United States appears to be quite low. A January poll conducted by Verian found that only about 6% of Greenlanders supported annexation by the U.S., while 85% opposed it, and 9% were undecided. This aligns with the general sentiment in Greenland, where the focus tends to be on either maintaining their current semi-autonomous status under Denmark or pursuing full independence".
Just wait until they see the Alaska Native Corporation Inupiat deal ... Kaaaaaaa-CHING$$$$$$$$
Hath thy court jester Dervish spoken without permission? Be gone, Sanders!
Piss off, Mystere. If Minus wants to ban me from his blog as you have banned me from your blog, he can do that. You have no authority to ban commenters from other people's blogs, dipsh!t.
Drink up, Derpwood! >GLUG GLUG GLUG!<
Straw Into Gold! Straw Into Gold!
Post a Comment