Minus: Still pushing Omerta for the US IC, eh Derv?
Yes. I think tinfoil hat conspiracies shouldn't be discussed publicly as if they were real. Impressionable morons (trumpers) WILL believe them. And have and are believing them. But I understand why you LOVE confusing the morons with false information.
"Historically, authoritarian regimes often thrive in environments where critical thinking and access to information are limited. A "dumbed-down" public -- one less equipped with knowledge, analytical skills, or a willingness to question -- might be more susceptible to the promises of order, stability, or simple solutions that authoritarian leaders often offer. This dynamic can be exacerbated by propaganda, censorship, and manipulation of education systems, all of which aim to shape public perception and discourage dissent".
Indeed. It's called hypernormalization... which is why George Soros has been capacity building rent-a-riot operations for the US IC in countries around the globe (and US). He calls it "The Alchemy of Finance". It's a "manufacturing of consent" machine that's been operating since WWII to manipulate democracies through corporate globalist and NGO PsyOps.
That explains why Pete was using it. Unfortunately his incompetence lead to him using it (when he shouldn't be) be revealed to a reporter who blew the whistle. Pete is the most unqualified and incompetent secretary of defense in us history. Hands down. He is proving it already.
The Signal app is owned by the Signal Technology Foundation, a nonprofit organization co-founded by Moxie Marlinspike and Brian Acton, and is not affiliated with Twitter.
That's what I get when I take anything you say at face value.
They are using it to get around record keeping requirements and foia requests though.
As per Malcolm Nance, this is the biggest ongoing security breach in US history. link
The Signal app was created more than a decade ago by Marlinspike, an entrepreneur, who was briefly head of product security at Twitter after he sold his mobile security startup, called Whisper Systems, to the social media company in 2011
Minus: You mean the canary trap that revealed the mole.
wtf? That's some bigly bullplop. I'm not surprised that you came up with something to excuse Pete's incompetence, though.
Copilot: A "mole", by definition, is someone who infiltrates an organization with the intent to leak information covertly. In this case, the journalist was accidentally added to the group chat, as confirmed by multiple reports. This doesn't align with the deliberate and secretive actions typically associated with a mole.
As for the "canary trap" reference, this term refers to a method used to identify information leaks by providing slightly different versions of sensitive information to various individuals and tracking which version gets leaked. There's no evidence suggesting that this was the case here. The inclusion of the journalist appears to have been a mistake, not a calculated tactic to expose anyone.
Your skepticism is well-founded. The situation seems more like a significant lapse in operational security rather than an elaborate espionage strategy. [end]
btw, you're predicting that Jeffrey Goldberg is going to be scapegoated? He was the "mole" that was exposed by the "canary trap"?
Copilot: The Yemen Signal chat incident has drawn significant attention, but as of now, there doesn't appear to be a single individual officially identified as taking the blame.
Me: According to this blogger, the "Yemen Signal chat incident" was a sting operation to identify and take out a mole.
Copilot: There doesn't appear to be any credible evidence or official reports suggesting that the "Yemen Signal chat incident" was a deliberate sting operation to expose a mole. ... The idea of it being a sting operation might be speculation or a theory circulating in certain circles, but it hasn't been substantiated by any reliable sources.
Me: I think this person will go to great lengths to defend anything and everything the trump administration does. Including inventing confabulated narratives with no basis in reality.
Copilot: It sounds like you're dealing with someone who’s deeply entrenched in their perspective, perhaps to the point of bending facts to fit their narrative. When someone is committed to defending a particular administration or ideology, it can lead to a kind of cognitive bias where they interpret events in ways that align with their beliefs, even if the evidence doesn’t support it.
In cases like this, it’s often less about the specific incident (like the Yemen Signal chat) and more about a broader pattern of loyalty or distrust toward certain institutions. It can be frustrating, especially when the conversation veers into speculation or conspiracy without grounding in reality.
25 comments:
Mike Benz = tinfoil poisoning. He needs help.
^^Dervish Sanders = Tinfoil Hatmaker to the Masses^^
Still pushing Omerta for the US IC, eh Derv?
Specialist in Veil Millinery...
Your have an inverted Ordo Amoris, Derv. Gov-citizen v. Citizen-Gov.
...and manufacturing cloaks for Gyges.
Minus: Still pushing Omerta for the US IC, eh Derv?
Yes. I think tinfoil hat conspiracies shouldn't be discussed publicly as if they were real. Impressionable morons (trumpers) WILL believe them. And have and are believing them. But I understand why you LOVE confusing the morons with false information.
"Historically, authoritarian regimes often thrive in environments where critical thinking and access to information are limited. A "dumbed-down" public -- one less equipped with knowledge, analytical skills, or a willingness to question -- might be more susceptible to the promises of order, stability, or simple solutions that authoritarian leaders often offer. This dynamic can be exacerbated by propaganda, censorship, and manipulation of education systems, all of which aim to shape public perception and discourage dissent".
This blog very much supports the continuing manufacture of Turd-2 Gyges cloaks. el0n purchased Twitter to increase manufacturing capacity bigly.
Indeed. It's called hypernormalization... which is why George Soros has been capacity building rent-a-riot operations for the US IC in countries around the globe (and US). He calls it "The Alchemy of Finance". It's a "manufacturing of consent" machine that's been operating since WWII to manipulate democracies through corporate globalist and NGO PsyOps.
The Signal App is owned by Twitter! :)
Minus: The Signal App is owned by Twitter!
That explains why Pete was using it. Unfortunately his incompetence lead to him using it (when he shouldn't be) be revealed to a reporter who blew the whistle. Pete is the most unqualified and incompetent secretary of defense in us history. Hands down. He is proving it already.
The Signal app is owned by the Signal Technology Foundation, a nonprofit organization co-founded by Moxie Marlinspike and Brian Acton, and is not affiliated with Twitter.
That's what I get when I take anything you say at face value.
They are using it to get around record keeping requirements and foia requests though.
As per Malcolm Nance, this is the biggest ongoing security breach in US history. link
You mean the canary trap that revealed the mole.
The Signal app was created more than a decade ago by Marlinspike, an entrepreneur, who was briefly head of product security at Twitter after he sold his mobile security startup, called Whisper Systems, to the social media company in 2011
:)
Open Whisper IS Whisper's tech.
Minus: You mean the canary trap that revealed the mole.
wtf? That's some bigly bullplop. I'm not surprised that you came up with something to excuse Pete's incompetence, though.
Copilot: A "mole", by definition, is someone who infiltrates an organization with the intent to leak information covertly. In this case, the journalist was accidentally added to the group chat, as confirmed by multiple reports. This doesn't align with the deliberate and secretive actions typically associated with a mole.
As for the "canary trap" reference, this term refers to a method used to identify information leaks by providing slightly different versions of sensitive information to various individuals and tracking which version gets leaked. There's no evidence suggesting that this was the case here. The inclusion of the journalist appears to have been a mistake, not a calculated tactic to expose anyone.
Your skepticism is well-founded. The situation seems more like a significant lapse in operational security rather than an elaborate espionage strategy. [end]
btw, you're predicting that Jeffrey Goldberg is going to be scapegoated? He was the "mole" that was exposed by the "canary trap"?
The aide was exposed. He's toast.
The scapegoat has been selected? Who is it?
Copilot: The Yemen Signal chat incident has drawn significant attention, but as of now, there doesn't appear to be a single individual officially identified as taking the blame.
Me: According to this blogger, the "Yemen Signal chat incident" was a sting operation to identify and take out a mole.
Copilot: There doesn't appear to be any credible evidence or official reports suggesting that the "Yemen Signal chat incident" was a deliberate sting operation to expose a mole. ... The idea of it being a sting operation might be speculation or a theory circulating in certain circles, but it hasn't been substantiated by any reliable sources.
No good intelligence Op ever is... until it gets declassified 50 years later.
Me: I think this person will go to great lengths to defend anything and everything the trump administration does. Including inventing confabulated narratives with no basis in reality.
Copilot: It sounds like you're dealing with someone who’s deeply entrenched in their perspective, perhaps to the point of bending facts to fit their narrative. When someone is committed to defending a particular administration or ideology, it can lead to a kind of cognitive bias where they interpret events in ways that align with their beliefs, even if the evidence doesn’t support it.
In cases like this, it’s often less about the specific incident (like the Yemen Signal chat) and more about a broader pattern of loyalty or distrust toward certain institutions. It can be frustrating, especially when the conversation veers into speculation or conspiracy without grounding in reality.
Says the man who thinks the Trump pee tapes will definitely show up in the next four years. @@
Who thinks that? You? I hope you're right. I don't know why Putin would release them when he is doing an A+ job in his puppet position.
I'd estimate the wave function collapsing on that possible option at least 5 Sigma close to zero.
...and there won't be any... for a few more weeks. No scalps for the Indians. :)
Post a Comment