The d0n0ld bubble has a lot of morons in it. If you are a smart person, I'd think you'd realize that. Although I believe it makes you happy that there are so many useful idiots willing to blindly follow the fascist maga agenda.
I'm cool with that. It doesn't concern me much that I'm in an imaginary bubble due to the imaginary "white guilt pride" you've been prattling on about endlessly.
Me: if you're speaking with people about a subject only to get their point of view and have zero expectation of converting them, I would say that is not evangelizing. In addition, I'd say that speaking with people who already agree with you isn't evangelizing either. Would you agree?
Copilot: I completely see where you're coming from, and I’d agree with your distinctions. Evangelizing, at its core, often involves an active intention to persuade or convert others to your viewpoint, belief, or cause. Merely gathering others' perspectives without any aim of conversion doesn’t align with that definition. That’s more akin to dialogue or intellectual exploration rather than evangelizing.
Similarly, speaking to those who already share your views might be reinforcing your stance or rallying like-minded individuals, but it’s not evangelizing -- it's more preaching to the choir, so to speak. Evangelism, by nature, implies reaching out to those who are not yet "converted".
If you want to be considered part of the group of "good people"... you must PERFORM, else you are a "bad person". It has EVERYTHING to do with "group conversion". It's the "masonic handshake" for group membership.
15 comments:
The d0n0ld bubble has a lot of morons in it. If you are a smart person, I'd think you'd realize that. Although I believe it makes you happy that there are so many useful idiots willing to blindly follow the fascist maga agenda.
Your white guilt-pride keeps you in the TDS bubble, jes' sayin'!
I'm cool with that. It doesn't concern me much that I'm in an imaginary bubble due to the imaginary "white guilt pride" you've been prattling on about endlessly.
Sorry, who does the preaching?
You're an f'ing EVANGELICAL.
Activism IS evangelism.
d0n0ld is Dervish's bogeyman.
Minus: You're an f'ing EVANGELICAL.
No.
Me: if you're speaking with people about a subject only to get their point of view and have zero expectation of converting them, I would say that is not evangelizing. In addition, I'd say that speaking with people who already agree with you isn't evangelizing either. Would you agree?
Copilot: I completely see where you're coming from, and I’d agree with your distinctions. Evangelizing, at its core, often involves an active intention to persuade or convert others to your viewpoint, belief, or cause. Merely gathering others' perspectives without any aim of conversion doesn’t align with that definition. That’s more akin to dialogue or intellectual exploration rather than evangelizing.
Similarly, speaking to those who already share your views might be reinforcing your stance or rallying like-minded individuals, but it’s not evangelizing -- it's more preaching to the choir, so to speak. Evangelism, by nature, implies reaching out to those who are not yet "converted".
Anti-racism is performative activism/evangelism.
If you want to be considered part of the group of "good people"... you must PERFORM, else you are a "bad person". It has EVERYTHING to do with "group conversion". It's the "masonic handshake" for group membership.
ps - No one tries to "convert the converted".
...but they will perform their secret handshake.
...its' their "sign" that MUST be worn.
The "ambivalence" you speak of is NOT permitted.
I don't "perform", I say what I mean. Are you performing?
Post a Comment