The right enables terrorism. NuttenYahoo created many more via his war crimes. gwb's idiotic "war on terror" did the same.
[A] ...report by David Rhode in the New York Times [from 2006] attests to the fact that Afghanistan is once again becoming the place it was before the Taliban was toppled almost five years ago: a place where jihadists of all stripes can train and engage in terrorism against infidels of all kinds. link
rightturds must love terrorists, as they are always creating more then they kill.
[Palestinian-American scholar, literary critic, and political activist] Edward Said also pointed to the essential aspect of the book’s focus on Arab and Muslim populations, which legitimized the indiscriminate use of violence against them: "If you can demonstrate that Libyans, Muslims, Palestinians and Arabs, in general, have no reality other than that which tautologically confirms their terrorist essence as Libyans, Muslims, Palestinians and Arabs, you can continue to attack them, and their “terrorist” states in general, and not question your own behavior". Said's words remain highly relevant seeing today's situation in Gaza.
Up until Melanie Philips said "every part of that, in my view, is a lie", what she was saying is accurate. How she describes Hamas is accurate, but that does mean every last person in Gaza is in lockstep with Hamas. And she completely dismisses NuttenYahoo's war crimes. In her mind, they are obviously simply not happening. Or justified, due to everyone who is killed being "evil". Which is your view. And the view of Qtard.
Dehumanize the "enemy" and you are completely justified in indiscriminately killing them. The right does the same thing in America. Why Turds like Mystere framed the election in terms of "good versus evil" and claims that d0n0ld is "God's chosen leader". Also continuously "warns" me that I'm going to Hell.
Are rightturds taking up arms and killing "evil" Lefties in the future? I think it could happen. I think many rightturds fantasize about it.
Copilot: Research and expert opinions suggest that large-scale military interventions, such as the U.S.-led War on Terror and Israeli operations in Gaza, can sometimes have the unintended consequence of fueling radicalization and recruitment for extremist groups.
For example, studies have shown that civilian casualties, destruction of infrastructure, and perceived injustices during military campaigns can create resentment and a sense of grievance among affected populations. This, in turn, can be exploited by extremist groups to recruit new members and justify their actions. In Gaza, the humanitarian crisis and repeated conflicts have been cited as factors that contribute to cycles of violence and radicalization.
Similarly, the U.S. War on Terror, particularly the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, has been criticized for destabilizing regions and inadvertently creating conditions that allowed groups like ISIS to emerge and gain support. The use of drone strikes and other tactics that result in civilian casualties has also been highlighted as a factor that can alienate local populations and drive recruitment for extremist organizations. [end]
Blowback = republicans are experts at creating it. Though Barack Obama created a lot of it too. But it was gwb that got us into the stupid "war on terror".
Minus: October 7 proved who the savages in Gaza truly are.
We already knew that about Hamas. Now we know it for certain about NuttenYahoo.
The hostages will all be killed.
Which is what NuttenYahoo wants. For the remaining hostages to be killed. As for the ones that have been released, you say they will be killed too? Who will kill them? Assassins?
Minus: ...So if Hamas' "human shields" die... we know who to blame as well.
Yes. But do you know? I think you obviously do not. FYI, it's both Hamas and NuttenYahoo. They are both to blame for the deaths of the "human shields" you don't give a sh!t about. Worse, you want them all wiped out. That is now both NuttenYahoo's and Turd-2's goal.
"Human Shields" = accomplices (as per Qtard). I think as per you as well.
Minus: Did you see the last hostages released? They were Musselmen. Explain why.
I don't know that was the case. Copilot says "From what I found, there’s no specific mention of hostages being emaciated in the context of recent releases by Hamas. However, it’s not uncommon for hostages held in difficult conditions to experience severe physical and emotional stress, which can lead to emaciation or other health issues".
But you say it would be better had they died? Hamas should have been feeding them adequately, giving all needed medical care, and seen to it that they got all the exercise they needed... or kill them?
btw, the useful idiots of the terrorists are rightturds. They always give the terrorists exactly what they want. Which is to overreact and kill many innocents (along with the terrorists). It bigly drives recruitment.
So, according to you, Hamas should be feeding prisoners ahead of themselves? Because they are such good guys? And when Israel is blocking food aid and killing people who try to deliver food aid? Well, you don't want Hamas to have that food aid (for good reason) -- but if Hamas doesn't have food, how are they supposed to feed their hostages? You seem to think getting back hostages in this condition was something we never could have imagined. As opposed to it being expected.
I don't hate anyone based on ethnicity, the social construct of race or due to their religion. You're a liar, Mystere. And you reveal your on biases and hatreds. Mystere is a bigly Muslim hater.
I don't hate ethnic Muslims. I simply hate their ridiculous Sharia legal ideology that ignores the testimony of women and other religious minorities. It's all Arab supremacy Jim Crow laws, which you support as part of your white guilt-pride semi-conscious stupidity.
Minus: ...which you support as part of your white guilt-pride semi-conscious stupidity.
I never said I supported "Sharia legal ideology". I have no "white guilt pride". I don't believe for one second that you don't hate Muslims. You've been calling for the death of everyone in Gaza since the Hamas terrorist attack. They are all "accomplices" (as per Qtard). You never disagreed with him. And you wrote quite a bit that indicated agreement.
You understand that Hamas' stated goal is the complete destruction of the State of Israel, right? It's in their Charter.
Oh wait, that the part of the argument that you conveniently must forget (and make unconscious) to allow yourself believe you're with Hamas on the side of the angels... @@
FYI, Nuttenyahoo gave bigly dollars to Hamas. It's documented.
Turd-2 is dOnOld. The "2" refers to his second administration. Mystere (due to being a moron) thinks Joe Biden served 2 terms? He should have, but he didn't. Except in Mystere's delusions. Maybe Mystere thinks d0n0ld can run for a "2nd" term in 2028. Because Turd-1 never happened.
Since 2021, USAID/West Bank and Gaza has invested over $600 million in economic support funding of the Palestinian people, in addition to the over $2.1 billion in humanitarian assistance since October 7, 2023.
Since 2021, USAID/West Bank and Gaza has invested over $600 million in economic support funding of the Palestinian people in addition to the over $2.1 billion in humanitarian assistance since October 7, 2023.
$0 for Hamas. Excepting what they may have stolen. Stolen isn't direct giving. Nuttenyahoo did that.
gOogle: Hamas was initially discreetly supported by Israel as a counter-balance to the secular PLO.
Though, as per Mystere's delusions, that didn't happen.
btw, you clearly hold the Qtard view on humanitarian aid. Money given to the Palestinians is defacto money given to Hamas. By way of a population of "accomplices".
Copilot: Humanitarian aid is typically allocated to address urgent needs like food, water, medical care, and shelter for civilians, not to fund political or militant groups. USAID and other organizations often have strict oversight mechanisms to ensure that funds are used for their intended purposes. While it’s true that Hamas governs Gaza, equating all humanitarian aid with direct support for Hamas is an oversimplification that ignores the complexities of aid distribution. [end]
Copilot: If there were credible evidence that humanitarian aid was being diverted to fund terrorism, it would absolutely warrant a reevaluation of how that aid is distributed -- or even a suspension until safeguards are in place. No one wants to see resources meant to alleviate suffering being misused.
38 comments:
The right enables terrorism. NuttenYahoo created many more via his war crimes. gwb's idiotic "war on terror" did the same.
[A] ...report by David Rhode in the New York Times [from 2006] attests to the fact that Afghanistan is once again becoming the place it was before the Taliban was toppled almost five years ago: a place where jihadists of all stripes can train and engage in terrorism against infidels of all kinds. link
rightturds must love terrorists, as they are always creating more then they kill.
[Palestinian-American scholar, literary critic, and political activist] Edward Said also pointed to the essential aspect of the book’s focus on Arab and Muslim populations, which legitimized the indiscriminate use of violence against them: "If you can demonstrate that Libyans, Muslims, Palestinians and Arabs, in general, have no reality other than that which tautologically confirms their terrorist essence as Libyans, Muslims, Palestinians and Arabs, you can continue to attack them, and their “terrorist” states in general, and not question your own behavior". Said's words remain highly relevant seeing today's situation in Gaza.
Up until Melanie Philips said "every part of that, in my view, is a lie", what she was saying is accurate. How she describes Hamas is accurate, but that does mean every last person in Gaza is in lockstep with Hamas. And she completely dismisses NuttenYahoo's war crimes. In her mind, they are obviously simply not happening. Or justified, due to everyone who is killed being "evil". Which is your view. And the view of Qtard.
Dehumanize the "enemy" and you are completely justified in indiscriminately killing them. The right does the same thing in America. Why Turds like Mystere framed the election in terms of "good versus evil" and claims that d0n0ld is "God's chosen leader". Also continuously "warns" me that I'm going to Hell.
Are rightturds taking up arms and killing "evil" Lefties in the future? I think it could happen. I think many rightturds fantasize about it.
Copilot: Research and expert opinions suggest that large-scale military interventions, such as the U.S.-led War on Terror and Israeli operations in Gaza, can sometimes have the unintended consequence of fueling radicalization and recruitment for extremist groups.
For example, studies have shown that civilian casualties, destruction of infrastructure, and perceived injustices during military campaigns can create resentment and a sense of grievance among affected populations. This, in turn, can be exploited by extremist groups to recruit new members and justify their actions. In Gaza, the humanitarian crisis and repeated conflicts have been cited as factors that contribute to cycles of violence and radicalization.
Similarly, the U.S. War on Terror, particularly the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, has been criticized for destabilizing regions and inadvertently creating conditions that allowed groups like ISIS to emerge and gain support. The use of drone strikes and other tactics that result in civilian casualties has also been highlighted as a factor that can alienate local populations and drive recruitment for extremist organizations. [end]
Blowback = republicans are experts at creating it. Though Barack Obama created a lot of it too. But it was gwb that got us into the stupid "war on terror".
October 7 proved who the savages in Gaza truly are.
The hostages will all be killed.
...So if Hamas' "human shields" die... we know who to blame as well.
Minus: October 7 proved who the savages in Gaza truly are.
We already knew that about Hamas. Now we know it for certain about NuttenYahoo.
The hostages will all be killed.
Which is what NuttenYahoo wants. For the remaining hostages to be killed. As for the ones that have been released, you say they will be killed too? Who will kill them? Assassins?
Minus: ...So if Hamas' "human shields" die... we know who to blame as well.
Yes. But do you know? I think you obviously do not. FYI, it's both Hamas and NuttenYahoo. They are both to blame for the deaths of the "human shields" you don't give a sh!t about. Worse, you want them all wiped out. That is now both NuttenYahoo's and Turd-2's goal.
"Human Shields" = accomplices (as per Qtard). I think as per you as well.
Did you see the last hostages released? They were Musselmen. Explain why...
Minus: Did you see the last hostages released? They were Musselmen. Explain why.
I don't know that was the case. Copilot says "From what I found, there’s no specific mention of hostages being emaciated in the context of recent releases by Hamas. However, it’s not uncommon for hostages held in difficult conditions to experience severe physical and emotional stress, which can lead to emaciation or other health issues".
But you say it would be better had they died? Hamas should have been feeding them adequately, giving all needed medical care, and seen to it that they got all the exercise they needed... or kill them?
btw, the useful idiots of the terrorists are rightturds. They always give the terrorists exactly what they want. Which is to overreact and kill many innocents (along with the terrorists). It bigly drives recruitment.
"...No specific mention? Really?
How many Gazans have lost 40% of their pre-Oct 7 body weight?
Not even one mention of it... h-m-m-m-f!
So, according to you, Hamas should be feeding prisoners ahead of themselves? Because they are such good guys? And when Israel is blocking food aid and killing people who try to deliver food aid? Well, you don't want Hamas to have that food aid (for good reason) -- but if Hamas doesn't have food, how are they supposed to feed their hostages? You seem to think getting back hostages in this condition was something we never could have imagined. As opposed to it being expected.
^Jew hater^
Dervish is a Bigly Jew Hater.
Dervish is a Bigly Muslim Lover.
You're Jewish, Mystere? I thought you claimed to be Christian...
Mystere: Jew hater. Dervish is a Bigly Jew Hater. Dervish is a Bigly Muslim Lover.
Hey, moron, I don't hate or love anyone based on ethnicity. That's something incredibly stupid people do. Why you do it, re your hate for "beaners".
I don't hate anyone based on ethnicity, the social construct of race or due to their religion. You're a liar, Mystere. And you reveal your on biases and hatreds. Mystere is a bigly Muslim hater.
I don't hate ethnic Muslims. I simply hate their ridiculous Sharia legal ideology that ignores the testimony of women and other religious minorities. It's all Arab supremacy Jim Crow laws, which you support as part of your white guilt-pride semi-conscious stupidity.
...aka - Social Justice.
Minus: ...which you support as part of your white guilt-pride semi-conscious stupidity.
I never said I supported "Sharia legal ideology". I have no "white guilt pride". I don't believe for one second that you don't hate Muslims. You've been calling for the death of everyone in Gaza since the Hamas terrorist attack. They are all "accomplices" (as per Qtard). You never disagreed with him. And you wrote quite a bit that indicated agreement.
You understand that Hamas' stated goal is the complete destruction of the State of Israel, right? It's in their Charter.
Oh wait, that the part of the argument that you conveniently must forget (and make unconscious) to allow yourself believe you're with Hamas on the side of the angels... @@
Forget you ever read this...
Fvck Hamas and fvck you. They do evil. You "only" support evil.
The Banality of Evil = Democratic Party
Yes, that is your delusion. I do not "believe [I am] with Hamas on the side of the angels". Hamas is evil. Turd-2 is carrying out an agenda of evil.
^^Dervish Sanders=BIGLIEST Jew Hater^^
^^Dervish is calling Mexicans and other Latinos beaners^^
Turd 2 = Biden. Dervish believes Joe Biden is carrying out HamAss attacks? Who knew?
How much money did Sleepy Joe give to Hamas? Billions.
$0.
FYI, Nuttenyahoo gave bigly dollars to Hamas. It's documented.
Turd-2 is dOnOld. The "2" refers to his second administration. Mystere (due to being a moron) thinks Joe Biden served 2 terms? He should have, but he didn't. Except in Mystere's delusions. Maybe Mystere thinks d0n0ld can run for a "2nd" term in 2028. Because Turd-1 never happened.
Since 2021, USAID/West Bank and Gaza has invested over $600 million in economic support funding of the Palestinian people, in addition to the over $2.1 billion in humanitarian assistance since October 7, 2023.
Since 2021, USAID/West Bank and Gaza has invested over $600 million in economic support funding of the Palestinian people in addition to the over $2.1 billion in humanitarian assistance since October 7, 2023.
$0 for Hamas. Excepting what they may have stolen. Stolen isn't direct giving. Nuttenyahoo did that.
gOogle: Hamas was initially discreetly supported by Israel as a counter-balance to the secular PLO.
Though, as per Mystere's delusions, that didn't happen.
btw, you clearly hold the Qtard view on humanitarian aid. Money given to the Palestinians is defacto money given to Hamas. By way of a population of "accomplices".
Hamas didn't represent the governing body of Palestinians in Gaza? Who knew?
Grow up Derv. Stop making stupid nonsensical arguments.
btw - Why didn't any of that "humanitarian aid" reach the Israeli hostages in Gaza? Got any guesses?
Dervy's butt pirates stole the cash.
Copilot: Humanitarian aid is typically allocated to address urgent needs like food, water, medical care, and shelter for civilians, not to fund political or militant groups. USAID and other organizations often have strict oversight mechanisms to ensure that funds are used for their intended purposes. While it’s true that Hamas governs Gaza, equating all humanitarian aid with direct support for Hamas is an oversimplification that ignores the complexities of aid distribution. [end]
I have zero "butt pirates", Mystere.
Copilot: If there were credible evidence that humanitarian aid was being diverted to fund terrorism, it would absolutely warrant a reevaluation of how that aid is distributed -- or even a suspension until safeguards are in place. No one wants to see resources meant to alleviate suffering being misused.
Post a Comment