Monday, February 24, 2014

Don't, through Silence, Consent to Energy Use Surveillance!

From the Dagger and Del. Glen Glass:
Dear Neighbor:

It has been an honor of mine to serve as a Delegate of the State of Maryland thus far. Your continued support and feedback have been critical and are important to me. I think it is important to offer you some feedback of my own. With that said, I want to take this opportunity to provide you with an update on the topic of smart meters.

2014 Session Legislation

This session, I have introduced two bills related to smart meters. House Bill (HB) 331 seeks to prohibit utility companies from disclosing consumers’ usage data to third parties. HB 332 looks out for utility consumers by allowing them to opt-out of a smart meter installation at no cost. There has been some attention given by the Senate on these two bills. The Senate’s version of HB 331 and HB 332 is SB 280 and SB 880, respectively. It is a victory that two Senators have introduced those bills in the Senate. Because of that, it is possible that the smart meter legislations will have a better chance of passing and being implemented into law by the end of this year’s session.

HB 331 and HB 332 will be heard on March 6, 2014 at 1:00pm in the House Economic Matters Committee. SB 280 and SB 880 will both be heard on March 4, 2014 at 1:00pm in the Senate Finance Committee. Please do not hesitate to contact my office if you are interested in testifying for any of these bills.

How to Defer the Installation of a Smart Meter

Until the Maryland Public Service Commission makes it decision on opting-out, you can send a letter to your utility company requesting a smart meter to not be installed. Please find attached a document ready to be printed and filled out. The document provides detailed information on how to defer the installation of a smart meter. In short, the necessary information you need when notifying your utility company is your name, address, account number, and signature.

OptOut

“As Big Brother As It Gets”

The issue of privacy is huge when it comes to smart meters. Smart meters essentially enable utility companies to have access to detailed, personal information of the usage of electronics in your home. This YouTube video describes the extent to which smart meters enable utility companies to have access to various forms of information based on one’s usage data. The information provided in the video is worth some consideration.
More Information

More information on smart meters and how to opt-out can be found at www.marylandsmartmeterawareness.org.

Thank You!

Once again, thank you for your continued support. I appreciate your taking the time to read this email. Please do not hesitate to contact my office should you have any comments, questions, or concerns. Also, I encourage you to contact your other Delegates and Senators to express your thoughts on the proposed bills.

Your Delegate and Servant,

Delegate Glen Glass
District 34A

Friday, February 21, 2014

Patriot Social

From the Harford County Dagger and Harford Campaign for Liberty:
February 25, 2014
7 pm – 9 pm


Knights of Columbus Hall
23 Newport Drive
Forest Hill, MD. 21050

Topics for February include:

• Factors driving the militarization of local police
• Immigration reform. What is the GOP leadership considering?
• Annapolis Update. Bills of special interest to the liberty minded patriot.

Free Admission
Cash Bar

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Citizens of Maryland vs. the NSA

from the Baltimore Sun
Legislation introduced in the Maryland General Assembly would require state and local officials to refuse to cooperate with the National Security Agency in a wide variety of ways if it continues to collect bulk electronic data without specific warrants.

Eight Republicans in the House of Delegates are backing what they call the Fourth Amendment Protection Act, which would punish officials who violate its provisions by removing them from their positions and excluding them from office permanently.

The eight co-sponsors are among the most libertarian-oriented members of the Republican Party and do not wield a great deal of influence in the Democratic-led House.

Del. Michael D. Smigiel Sr. of Cecil County, the lead sponsor of the bill, said the legislation is intended to protect the Constitution from encroachment by the NSA, one of the state's largest employers

"The NSA is nothing but a tool and we need to make sure the tool is sharpened and pointed in the right direction," he said. "It's easy to protect the Constitution when it's not under attack."

Among other things, the bill could require Howard County, which recently reached an agreement to supply the NSA with water to cool its supercomputers, to cut off the agency. If the county refused to break the agreement, the legislation would cut off state grant funds. The measure would also preclude state agencies from using information uncovered through such data collection practices in criminal investigations.

The bill is a reaction to revelations by former NSA contract worker Edward Snowden about the agency's collection of bulk electronic records known as "metadata" as part of its global effort to counter terrorism.

U.S. Rep. C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger, a Maryland Democrat who serves as ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a statement calling the bill "unnecessarily punitive and ill-informed."

Ruppersberger said the program Smigiel is targeting has been approved by Congress and upheld by federal courts.

"It is bad enough that Edward Snowden has demonized the NSA, but for Maryland lawmakers to degrade their own constituents and threaten so many Maryland jobs is unconscionable," Ruppersberger said.

The legislation is based on model language drafted by the Tenth Amendment Center, an organization dedicated to curbing federal power. According the the center, lawmakers in 12 other states are considering similar legislation.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

How Maryland Legislators Clean House...

from the Washington Post
For nearly two months, top Maryland leaders have promised to investigate what went wrong with the launch of the state’s online health insurance marketplace. But they have been vague on when or how that would happen.

Last week, legislative leaders said that instead of continuing to question health officials and request documents, they are likely to defer to a previously scheduled state audit of the exchange that is expected to begin this summer and could take a year to complete. That angered many Republicans and some Democrats who want a full accounting now.

They said that a delay could also spare Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown (D), who is running for governor, from having to publicly address more questions about the exchange before the Democratic primary on June 24 or the general election in November. Brown was tasked with implementing President Obama’s Affordable Care Act in Maryland.

“We don’t have time to wait,” said Del. Heather R. Mizeur (D-Montgomery), who is running for governor. “I don’t know anybody in Annapolis who feels like they have their hands around what is still problematic.”

Maryland was one of 14 states that opted to launch their own online health insurance exchanges, created as part of the Affordable Care Act, instead of relying on the federal marketplace. But the roll-out of Maryland’s plan has been one of the most troubled. The Web site crashed on its first day of operation and has been plagued with problems that have made it difficult for Marylanders to sign up for health insurance. Two of the contractors that built the online exchange continue to fight.

Sen. Thomas M. Middleton (D-Charles), the chairman of the Finance Committee who has coordinated inquiries into the exchange, said doing a full investigation now would distract health officials from signing Marylanders up for health insurance before the March 31 deadline. He said that the media have already reported the “juiciest information” about the exchange’s shortcomings and that anything more would simply be generating “wonderful election fodder.”

“I’m not looking to make excuses for it,” Middleton said of the exchange on Friday. “But I don’t see anything that warrants a full-scale investigation.”

Senate Minority Leader David R. Brinkley (R-Frederick), who wants the state to hire outside counsel to investigate, scoffed at the suggestion that such an inquiry would reduce the number of Marylanders who get health insurance.

“They are recognizing that there’s an ongoing problem, but they don’t want to address it because it might cause embarrassment to the lieutenant governor in his gubernatorial bid,” he said.

Justin Schall, Brown’s campaign manager, said that those calling for an immediate review are putting “their own personal gain” before the health care of Marylanders.

“The people of Maryland deserve a comprehensive review process that isn’t driven by political ambition,” Schall said. “The lieutenant governor has been clear from the beginning that he believes there should be a full review once the state has done everything in its power to sign up anyone who wants to enroll before March 31.”

Jared Smith, the lieutenant governor’s communications director, said Brown is working with others to find the “best way to do a comprehensive and meaningful review, deliver accountability.” In the meantime, he added, the exchange continues to improve.

Brown testified before lawmakers for several hours in mid-January and answered questions about the troubled exchange. Brown said then that he was unaware of impending problems with the site ahead of its launch and had not seen reports about instability.

Although some officials grilled Brown, most saved their most difficult questions for the state’s secretary of health and mental hygiene.

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) has said the exchange has been greatly improved and is now functioning for a majority of people. But enrollment numbers continue to lag behind expectations. As of Jan. 25, officials say, 26,832 Marylanders had enrolled in private plans, a pace far short of the goal to enroll at least 150,000 by March 31. Brown once touted an even higher goal — 180,000.

The exchange is largely functioning through makeshift work-arounds, state health officials have said. Rather than signing up for insurance through the Web site, many Marylanders have instead contacted newly formed call centers and spent hours on the phone. Some applications are being processed on paper.

The exchange’s chief information officer said last week that “multiple defects remain” and that there are “a number of architectural and infrastructure issues” that need to be corrected, according to a presentation he gave to the state exchange board.

Meanwhile, two contractors that worked on the exchange continue to fight over money in court.

Maryland’s main contractor — Noridian — has a contract worth $193 million, according to a presentation that the exchange’s chief financial officer gave last week. So far the state has paid Noridian nearly $65 million and has unpaid invoices totaling another $13 million.

Noridian hired another contractor, EngagePoint, to integrate different pieces of software together into one seamless operation. Soon after the failed launch, Noridian ended its contract with EngagePoint and went about fixing the exchange itself with few employees and uncertain where to begin, according to internal e-mails obtained by The Washington Post. Noridian then tried hiring back EngagePoint workers, triggering the federal lawsuit.

EngagePoint is seeking $7.4 million from Noridian for work done before and after the site launched, according to recent court filings. Noridian disputes that amount in legal filings. Maryland officials could soon be pulled into that dispute, because EngagePoint has asked the state to withhold the money from Noridian or pay EngagePoint directly. Noridian officials say in court records that withholding money could “significantly” impair their ability to complete work on the Maryland exchange.

Noridian and EngagePoint declined comment, citing the court case.

Maryland health officials have received EngagePoint’s request and they have asked Noridian for a response, but “have not at this point intervened,” said Dori Henry, an exchange spokeswoman.

The exchange’s first enrollment period began on Oct. 1 and will end on March 31. The next will start on Nov. 15. Although state officials have said it is important for Maryland to stick with its own exchange for the first enrollment period, all options would be open, they said, including abandoning all or parts of the site. Those calling for an investigation say it is important to have a clear understanding of the exchange’s problems by then so that the state can decide what to do next.

Other states that have had trouble with their exchanges have already begun inquiries. Minnesota’s lead auditor launched a “full-throttle investigation” into the state’s exchange on Jan. 7, according to local media reports. The audit is expected to examine the work done by contractors, including one that also worked on Maryland’s exchange, and the oversight by state officials. That same day, Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin (D) called for a third-party review of his state’s exchange.

Special investigations are rare in Maryland, where Democrats dominate politics. The last memorable probe was in 2005 when a special legislative committee examined the hiring and firing practices of then-Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R).

Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler (D), another gubernatorial hopeful, said the legislative committees should continue to hold hearings or assign a “special body” to investigate. Gansler said that he made a similar request after reports of corruption at the Baltimore jail and was ignored.

“In Maryland, in these types of things, we’ve clearly swept things under the rug,” Gansler said.

Part of the problem is that only one party has most of the power, said Del. Ronald George (R-Anne Arundel) who is also running for governor. Waiting for the regularly scheduled audit could mean allowing two legislative cycles to pass before making changes.

“It’s unbelievable,” said George, who has called for a full investigation by lawmakers. “It’s like everyone here is trying to protect everyone else because we’re all good friends. We’re not friends. We’re the government.”