The “Government shutdown”, or should I say “Chuck Schumer’s Shutdown”? Either way, it’s the Democrat’s Shut-Down, no matter who you want to blame it has taken a dark turn, and millions of Americans depending on the “SNAP” Food Assistance Program are now caught in the political crossfire Let me just point out, if I might, that we are 29 days into a Democrat shutdown. And the senator from New Mexico was absolutely right. SNAP recipients shouldn’t be going without food.
This is INSANE! American People should be getting paid in this Country. And we’ve tried to do that 13 times. And they voted NO 13 times.
This isn’t a political game. These are real people’s lives that we’re talking about. And you all have just figured out, 29 days in, that, oh, there might be some consequences. Lets not forget Schumer’s remarks that “ the Longer the Shut-Down lasts the better it is for us”! Really? And who exactly is “US”?
There are people who are running out of money. Yeah, we’re 29 days in. And they’ve done their best to make sure that a lot of these programs are funded. And they don’t want to hear Chuck Schumer bragging about this!
But at some point, the government runs out of money. 13 times, people over here voted to fund SNAP. 13 times. Chuck Schumer’s Democrats are betting that holding the budget hostage would force Republicans to cave, but their gamble has Backfired Catastrophically. Instead of protecting low-income families, seniors in high-cost states, and struggling rural communities, they’ve jeopardized their lifeline. While Democratic politicians in Washingtonvare busy making all kinks of snappy remarks , the grocery shelves are getting emptier, and anxiety is spreading among millions of SNAP recipients wondering when or even if their benefits will return! There are nearly 42 million Americans who completly rely on the government just to put food on the table. We’re not looking at a “Safety Net” not anymore; we’re looking at a dependency trap. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), once designed as a temporary measure for struggling families, has morphed into a “Permanent fixture of American life, and a drain on working taxpayers. Food stamp abuse isn’t rare, it’s routine. Fraudulent Claims,Waste, Fraud, even Duplicate applications, and even Illegal Trafficking of benefits for cash or drugs are well-documented. Yet, year after year, Democratic politicians are pumping Billions of more, and more “Pork” into the same bloated system giving more, and more of this Pork to Illeagles while we Americans taxpayers Foot the Bill.
I wouldn't know who Mike Benz if not for your blog. With every video you post of his, I hate this lying tinfoil hate Turd more. donald trump is 100 percent a Russian asset and the Steele dossier
James Comey and John O. Brennan will not go to prison. Nobody will get jail time in regards to your BS narrative of there being an "op" against the "democratically elected" donald trump for "regime change".
"People like this are remembered for their jail time"... but no Democrats will go to jail. republicans belong in prison. Though if these Turds are ever held accountable is questionable.
btw, is Mike on steroids? He looks jacked.
fyi, donald trump is guilty of sedition and I think he could be hanged for his crimes.
Minus: Boasberg's about to get Impeached. I wonder who Trump will appoint to replace him. :)
Nobody. Because he won't be either impeached -- or impeached and removed.
Via Copilot...
The blog comment refers to Judge James Boasberg, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., who is facing impeachment calls from some Republican lawmakers over his role in authorizing subpoenas and gag orders in the Arctic Frost investigation. However, impeachment is unlikely to succeed.
A formal impeachment resolution (H.Res.229) was introduced in March 2025 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX), citing “high crimes and misdemeanors”.
Another resolution by Rep. Andy Biggs seeks to bypass impeachment by invoking the “Good Behavior” clause of the Constitution.
Despite these efforts, legal experts and mainstream analysts suggest impeachment is highly unlikely to succeed, given the political makeup of Congress and the high bar for removing a federal judge.
[end]
Plus there was absolutely nothing improper about the Artic Frost investigation.
Via Copilot...
No mainstream legal authority has found the investigation itself to be improper.
Gag orders and sealed subpoenas are routine judicial tools, especially in cases involving national security or obstruction concerns.
Judge Boasberg’s role was to authorize these tools under existing law, not to invent new powers or act outside judicial norms.
[end]
Additionally, if this judge were to be impeached, complete disclosure of the the results of the investigation could reveal wrongdoing by those being investigated. Another reason not to move forward with impeachment.
Via Copilot...
...transparency could also expose unlawful conduct by those being investigated—the very targets of Arctic Frost. If the sealed findings contain damning evidence, then pushing for impeachment might inadvertently unseal that archive and implicate political allies or reveal inconvenient truths.
There are emergency funds that could be tapped to fund SNAP. Turd-2 is choosing not to use these funds in order to punish people who need them. Because they know Democrats care about these people, while Republicans do not.
It will only happen in your delusions. Not in reality.
But I agree it could be sweet to expose republiturd sedition and prove that Artic Frost was an entirely justified investigation. Another reason there will be no impeachment. Seditious republiturds only want to bitch and moan about this to propagandize the public.
This is the playbook. Same as when donald trump told Zelenskyy during his first term to announce there was an investigation into Joe Biden. He wasn't asking for an actual investigation, only for one to be announced. Because, in rightturd land, accusations equal guilt. And trials and discovery are to be avoided, as they prove innocence.
FYI, the James Comey and Leticia James fake show trials likely won't happen. Due to Lindsey Halligan being improperly appointed. Aside from the fact that he is innocent.
Trump's tariffs have not significantly revived American manufacturing jobs, and outsourcing continues to funnel disproportionate profits to corporations rather than workers.
Here’s a breakdown of both of your points...
🏭 1. Tariffs Have Not Brought Back American Jobs.
Despite the rhetoric, multiple analyses show that Trump’s tariffs have not led to a manufacturing jobs boom:
Manufacturing job losses: Industries exposed to tariffs have actually shed jobs. As of late 2025, U.S. manufacturing employment has declined for four consecutive months, with 78,000 fewer jobs than a year ago.
Higher costs, not more jobs: Tariffs are taxes on imports, and those costs are passed on to American businesses and consumers, not absorbed by foreign producers. This has led to higher prices, slower production, and uncertainty for small businesses.
No structural reshoring: There’s little evidence that tariffs have meaningfully reshored production. Instead, companies often shift supply chains to other low-wage countries, not back to the U.S..
In short, tariffs have increased costs without delivering the promised employment gains.
---
💰 2. Outsourcing Profits Go to Corporations, Not Consumers or Workers.
Your second point—that outsourcing enriches corporations rather than benefiting workers or consumers—is also well-supported:
Profit over wages: Outsourcing is primarily used to maximize profit margins, not to lower prices for consumers or reinvest in domestic labor. One study notes that 83% of companies outsource to reduce costs, but those savings often translate into higher executive compensation and shareholder returns, not lower prices.
CEO pay vs. labor costs: The gap between executive pay and average worker wages has ballooned. The money saved by paying foreign workers less is rarely redirected toward hiring American workers or improving wages.
Labor income share declines: Research shows that outsourcing reduces the labor income share—meaning a smaller portion of economic output goes to workers, while capital owners (i.e., corporations and shareholders) take more.
So yes, the system Les is accused of supporting—globalized production for cheap goods—does not equitably distribute its benefits. Joe Conservative’s critique might gesture toward a real moral tension (the Omelas reference), but his proposed solution (tariffs) doesn’t resolve it—and may even exacerbate inequality.
34 comments:
Challenge the BS the KSoA is belching out daily as well as the lies his sycophants in his regime fart out regularly.
The “Government shutdown”, or should I say “Chuck Schumer’s Shutdown”? Either way, it’s the Democrat’s Shut-Down, no matter who you want to blame it has taken a dark turn, and millions of Americans depending on the “SNAP” Food Assistance Program are now caught in the political crossfire
Let me just point out, if I might, that we are 29 days into a Democrat shutdown. And the senator from New Mexico was absolutely right. SNAP recipients shouldn’t be going without food.
This is INSANE! American People should be getting paid in this Country. And we’ve tried to do that 13 times. And they voted NO 13 times.
This isn’t a political game. These are real people’s lives that we’re talking about. And you all have just figured out, 29 days in, that, oh, there might be some consequences. Lets not forget Schumer’s remarks that “ the Longer the Shut-Down lasts the better it is for us”! Really? And who exactly is “US”?
There are people who are running out of money. Yeah, we’re 29 days in. And they’ve done their best to make sure that a lot of these programs are funded. And they don’t want to hear Chuck Schumer bragging about this!
But at some point, the government runs out of money. 13 times, people over here voted to fund SNAP. 13 times.
Chuck Schumer’s Democrats are betting that holding the budget hostage would force Republicans to cave, but their gamble has Backfired Catastrophically. Instead of protecting low-income families, seniors in high-cost states, and struggling rural communities, they’ve jeopardized their lifeline.
While Democratic politicians in Washingtonvare busy making all kinks of snappy remarks , the grocery shelves are getting emptier, and anxiety is spreading among millions of SNAP recipients wondering when or even if their benefits will return!
There are nearly 42 million Americans who completly rely on the government just to put food on the table. We’re not looking at a “Safety Net” not anymore; we’re looking at a dependency trap. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), once designed as a temporary measure for struggling families, has morphed into a “Permanent fixture of American life, and a drain on working taxpayers. Food stamp abuse isn’t rare, it’s routine. Fraudulent Claims,Waste, Fraud, even Duplicate applications, and even Illegal Trafficking of benefits for cash or drugs are well-documented. Yet, year after year, Democratic politicians are pumping Billions of more, and more “Pork” into the same bloated system giving more, and more of this Pork to Illeagles while we Americans taxpayers Foot the Bill.
Democrats seek power. Republicans seek money. And the country is run by psychopaths.
I wouldn't know who Mike Benz if not for your blog. With every video you post of his, I hate this lying tinfoil hate Turd more. donald trump is 100 percent a Russian asset and the Steele dossier
James Comey and John O. Brennan will not go to prison. Nobody will get jail time in regards to your BS narrative of there being an "op" against the "democratically elected" donald trump for "regime change".
"People like this are remembered for their jail time"... but no Democrats will go to jail. republicans belong in prison. Though if these Turds are ever held accountable is questionable.
btw, is Mike on steroids? He looks jacked.
fyi, donald trump is guilty of sedition and I think he could be hanged for his crimes.
Boasberg's about to get Impeached. I wonder who Trump will appoint to replace him. :)
:)
Minus: Boasberg's about to get Impeached. I wonder who Trump will appoint to replace him. :)
Nobody. Because he won't be either impeached -- or impeached and removed.
Via Copilot...
The blog comment refers to Judge James Boasberg, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., who is facing impeachment calls from some Republican lawmakers over his role in authorizing subpoenas and gag orders in the Arctic Frost investigation. However, impeachment is unlikely to succeed.
A formal impeachment resolution (H.Res.229) was introduced in March 2025 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX), citing “high crimes and misdemeanors”.
Another resolution by Rep. Andy Biggs seeks to bypass impeachment by invoking the “Good Behavior” clause of the Constitution.
Despite these efforts, legal experts and mainstream analysts suggest impeachment is highly unlikely to succeed, given the political makeup of Congress and the high bar for removing a federal judge.
[end]
Plus there was absolutely nothing improper about the Artic Frost investigation.
Via Copilot...
No mainstream legal authority has found the investigation itself to be improper.
Gag orders and sealed subpoenas are routine judicial tools, especially in cases involving national security or obstruction concerns.
Judge Boasberg’s role was to authorize these tools under existing law, not to invent new powers or act outside judicial norms.
[end]
Additionally, if this judge were to be impeached, complete disclosure of the the results of the investigation could reveal wrongdoing by those being investigated. Another reason not to move forward with impeachment.
Via Copilot...
...transparency could also expose unlawful conduct by those being investigated—the very targets of Arctic Frost. If the sealed findings contain damning evidence, then pushing for impeachment might inadvertently unseal that archive and implicate political allies or reveal inconvenient truths.
[end]
There are emergency funds that could be tapped to fund SNAP. Turd-2 is choosing not to use these funds in order to punish people who need them. Because they know Democrats care about these people, while Republicans do not.
I love it when Democrats fold like a wet tent.
Yes, his impeachment will be s-w-e-e-e-e-t!
It will only happen in your delusions. Not in reality.
But I agree it could be sweet to expose republiturd sedition and prove that Artic Frost was an entirely justified investigation. Another reason there will be no impeachment. Seditious republiturds only want to bitch and moan about this to propagandize the public.
This is the playbook. Same as when donald trump told Zelenskyy during his first term to announce there was an investigation into Joe Biden. He wasn't asking for an actual investigation, only for one to be announced. Because, in rightturd land, accusations equal guilt. And trials and discovery are to be avoided, as they prove innocence.
FYI, the James Comey and Leticia James fake show trials likely won't happen. Due to Lindsey Halligan being improperly appointed. Aside from the fact that he is innocent.
Both James Comey and Letitia James are innocent of what they are accused of.
Yup, right now, in the present moment, this nation is indeed being run by psychopaths. Psychopathic cons of the tRumpublican party.
How can that be? Schumer shut down the government!
I sure hope that they don't miss their orange jumpsuit fittings (especially Tish). It'll be years before than wear any other clothes.
👆In denial of reality 👆
But denying reality won't make your delusions true.
Orange is the new black!
KSoA and his tRumpublican party SHUT DOWN the government. Ignorant deluded fascists simply choose not to see it.
15+ votes to open it say otherwise.
Orange is the new slime and gunk.
Orange is Joe Biden Administration's colour!
No, it's your hero the KSoA's face color.
No.
And the Biden Admin's future wardrobe. Cheetoh orange.
Maybe your illusory imagination.
lol! Votes count. Polls don't.
Mirroring yours.
Not possible. Your delusions and illusions are founded on hate and othering.
..and yours out of LOVE and compassion for the Orange Man. @@
Nope. He's the one person I actually despise to the depth of my being.
Are you claiming to be a utilitarian now? Enjoy your Omelas.
;p
Via Copilot...
Trump's tariffs have not significantly revived American manufacturing jobs, and outsourcing continues to funnel disproportionate profits to corporations rather than workers.
Here’s a breakdown of both of your points...
🏭 1. Tariffs Have Not Brought Back American Jobs.
Despite the rhetoric, multiple analyses show that Trump’s tariffs have not led to a manufacturing jobs boom:
Manufacturing job losses: Industries exposed to tariffs have actually shed jobs. As of late 2025, U.S. manufacturing employment has declined for four consecutive months, with 78,000 fewer jobs than a year ago.
Higher costs, not more jobs: Tariffs are taxes on imports, and those costs are passed on to American businesses and consumers, not absorbed by foreign producers. This has led to higher prices, slower production, and uncertainty for small businesses.
No structural reshoring: There’s little evidence that tariffs have meaningfully reshored production. Instead, companies often shift supply chains to other low-wage countries, not back to the U.S..
In short, tariffs have increased costs without delivering the promised employment gains.
---
💰 2. Outsourcing Profits Go to Corporations, Not Consumers or Workers.
Your second point—that outsourcing enriches corporations rather than benefiting workers or consumers—is also well-supported:
Profit over wages: Outsourcing is primarily used to maximize profit margins, not to lower prices for consumers or reinvest in domestic labor. One study notes that 83% of companies outsource to reduce costs, but those savings often translate into higher executive compensation and shareholder returns, not lower prices.
CEO pay vs. labor costs: The gap between executive pay and average worker wages has ballooned. The money saved by paying foreign workers less is rarely redirected toward hiring American workers or improving wages.
Labor income share declines: Research shows that outsourcing reduces the labor income share—meaning a smaller portion of economic output goes to workers, while capital owners (i.e., corporations and shareholders) take more.
So yes, the system Les is accused of supporting—globalized production for cheap goods—does not equitably distribute its benefits. Joe Conservative’s critique might gesture toward a real moral tension (the Omelas reference), but his proposed solution (tariffs) doesn’t resolve it—and may even exacerbate inequality.
[End]
Post a Comment