Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Free Sistan and Balochistan (adding Hormozgan Province)!


In the Sistan and Baluchestan Province of Iran, Sunni Muslims make up a clear regional majority, estimated at roughly 60% to 70% of the total population, driven primarily by the dominant ethnic Baluch community.

Demographics and Religion

Ethnic Breakdown: The southern and central parts of the province (Baluchestan) are heavily populated by ethnic Baluch people who predominantly practice Sunni Islam.

The Sistan Region: The northern part of the province (Sistan) is largely populated by Sistani Persians who mainly adhere to Shia Islam.

National Context: While Shia Islam is the official state religion of Iran (comprising 90% to 95% of the national population), Sistan and Baluchestan remains one of the few provinces where Sunnis form the local majority.
The Balochi population in Iran is estimated at roughly 2 to 3 million people (about 2% of Iran's total population). They live mostly in the southeastern corner of the country, primarily in the large province of Sistan and Baluchestan, extending up into parts of neighboring Kerman and Khorasan provinces. [1, 2, 3]
Geographic Distribution
  • Primary Region: Sistan and Baluchestan province, running along the borders of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
  • Main Cities: Zahedan (the provincial capital), Chabahar, Iranshahr, and Saravan.
  • Minority Enclaves: Smaller historical Balochi diaspora pockets are also found further north in parts of Khorasan and Golestan. [1, 2]
Key Demographic Facts
  • Language: Balochi (Western dialects).
  • Religion: Mostly Sunni Muslim (contrasting with the official Shia majority of Iran).
  • Mapping Resources: For visual maps depicting ethnic distributions in Iran, geographic references like the Library of Congress Iran Ethnic map or demographic overviews via Minority Rights Group illustrate their heavy concentration in the southeast. [1, 2, 3]
WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESS Newswire / June 12, 2025 / The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is announcing the launch of the Balochistan Studies Project. Balochistan has a strategic geographical position and is an important economic gateway, with trillions of dollars' worth of underground natural resources such as oil, gas, uranium, copper, and coal, rare earth elements, and the two deep seaports of Gawadar and Chabahar. Balochistan is the perfect outpost to counter and keep under control Iran, its nuclear ambitions, and its dangerous relations with Pakistan, which may provide Tehran with tactical nukes.
Balochistan ties to Oman
Balochistan and Oman share deep historical, demographic, and geopolitical ties spanning millennia across the Arabian Sea and the Makran coast. These connections range from ancient maritime trade and shared tribal lineages to Omani sovereignty over the port city of Gwadar until 1958. 

Demographic and Cultural Links

Omani Baloch: An estimated 20% to 30% of the population in the Sultanate of Oman is of Baloch descent. Centuries of migration from the Makran coast have integrated these communities into mainstream Omani society, where they hold prominent roles in civil life, culture, and the military. 

Military Service: For generations spanning the 18th to 20th centuries, Baloch fighters served as key mercenary and regular security forces for Omani rulers, forming the backbone of early modern Omani military structures. 

Shared Heritage: Traditional music, dance (such as Chaapi), and linguistic threads remain shared across the coastal regions of Balochistan and Oman due to continuous historical movement across the Gulf of Oman. 

The Gwadar Connection

Omani Exclave: The strategic coastal town of Gwadar in present-day Pakistani Balochistan was ruled as an overseas possession of Oman for over two centuries, beginning in the late 1700s. 

The 1958 Transfer: The Gwadar Purchase transferred sovereignty of the enclave from Muscat and Oman to Pakistan on September 8, 1958, formally ending direct Omani territorial administration in the region

Sunday, August 16, 2026

The Wide and Easy Downhill Road to Dupedom: Fear

Jewish Rustlers Stampeding Gentile Cattle?

The Wise Bull (not Trump)

A Young Bull and an Old Bull were standing on a hilltop overlooking a herd of cattle.  The Young Bull turned to the Old Bull and said, "Let's run down the hill and get ourselves a heifer.  The Old Bull replies, "Let's walk down and get them all..."

Friday, August 14, 2026

Should Leftism be Listed in the DSM?

 

Vandalizing our World War II Memorial is a despicable attack on a sacred monument honoring the Americans who fought and died for our freedom. Those Americans include my father and grandfather.

This morning, we are filing two felony charges, Depredation Against Property of the… pic.twitter.com/7EQxGWtdue

— US Attorney Pirro (@USAttyPirro) August 14, 2026

Thursday, August 13, 2026

It's the Anti-Semitism, Stupid?

Trauma Symptoms Associated with Race Essentialist Beliefs are Dogging American Politics - "I'm being Persecuted Solely because of my Race, not Israel's Jewish Essentialist Policies!"

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Putting the CIA in aCademIA

Fire Matt Walsh!

He Doesn't Want to Eat Del Taco Burritos!

Black Voter Suppression?

Daniel Greenfield, "The Abdul El-Sayed and Hong Polls Were Black Voter Suppression by the Media"
If Republicans were doing this, there'd be a civil rights investigation.

Ahead of the Michigan Senate primary, the media pushed polls claiming that Abdul Mohammed El-Sayed was far ahead of Haley Stevens when it actually out to be a fairly close and narrow race.

Now we had a repeat of that in the Wisconsin gubernatorial campaign where polls were projecting a Hong win by between 18 to 25 when Crowley narrowly defeated her in the actual race.

The pollsters will claim that they ‘dropped the ball’, but these are very similar ‘errors’ involving vast leads being assigned to socialist candidates right ahead of the election. The net effect of these polls was voter suppression against Crowley and Stevens voters who were seen as less motivated and driven than the socialist candidates. It worked in the Michigan race, but didn’t in the Wisconsin race.

It’s easy enough to manufacture such a swing by undersampling black and working class voters, the Stevens and Crowley base, while oversampling white leftists, suburban woke moms, college students and so forth

What that amounts to, ironically enough, is the very thing that Dems and the media accuse Republicans of, black voter suppression.

This is the second Dem primary race in which the pollsters engaged in black voter suppression by oversampling white leftists in an attempt to depress black voter turnout for the non-socialist candidates.

If Republicans were doing this, there’d be a civil rights investigation.

But it’s leftists doing this and so it’s treated as some sort of innocent error.

---

Sundance, "Surprise Defeat for DSA Communist Francesca Hong in Wisconsin"

The DSA Communists are claiming election rigging in Wisconsin as Francesca Hong has been defeated by DNC party approved candidate David Crowley.

The current status of the race is Crowley with 39.78% (313,321) and Hong with 39.37% (310,110). Crowley leading by more than three thousand votes
The reason for the apoplexy is that all polling showed Hong with an easy 20-to-25-point lead heading into election day.

State Navigate polling had Francesca Hong +22, Public Policy Polling had predicted Hong +18, Marquette University polling (the gold standard) had Hong +25, then State Navigate polling had Hong +29, and finally Public Policy Polling had another easy win at Hong +20.

Therefore, the only way the DSA Communists can reconcile the outcome of Hong losing is to believe that some other malevolent force was involved in the actual counting of the ballots.

Malevolent force below the fold:

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Maryland State Democrats Ignore Own Rules and Vote to Disenfranchise 49% of Maryland Voters

Paving the Way for DSA's Race-Based Communism

A Racial Crossroads, or Wishful Thinking?

Helen Andrews, "The Racial Crossroads"

American race relations are at a crossroads. In the years since our current racial bargain was struck in the 1960s, our country has coped with its contradictions and imperfections by the very American method of muddling through. That has worked for a long time, but soon it won’t work anymore. We will have to choose between one path and another. There are two reasons for this, and they are unavoidable.

The first reason is demographic. Our racial bargain was made for a country that was biracial and almost 90 percent white. It will no longer work for a country where white people are a minority and the non-white population includes multiple races, including some that were hardly present in the United States when the racial bargain was struck. There were fewer Chinese Americans in 1960 than there are Egyptian Americans today and fewer Mexican-born Americans then than Venezuelan-born Americans now.

For Generation Z, the beneficiaries of our system of racial benefits are no longer a marginal 10 percent of the population. They are a demographic majority. Non-white Zoomers—and, to an extent, white women as well—benefit from both demographic predominance and an explicit or tacit boost in any head-to-head competition with white men, which, in combination, means that affirmative action is no longer a matter of white Americans sacrificing the occasional promotion. It means white men in particular are effectively shut out of many prestigious fields and institutions, especially in the lower rungs.

This is both unfair and unworkable. Unfair, because a white Zoomer does not feel toward the son of an Indian computer programmer or the daughter of a Mexican illegal immigrant the same moral obligation he feels toward the descendant of slaves. Unworkable, because the challenge of making every institution match our national demographics becomes more difficult as our diversity gets more diverse. Diversity used to mean making sure there was a black person in the room. Now it means finely calibrating multiple demographics, which requires putting race at the forefront of personnel decisions.

The second reason race relations are approaching a crisis is that our racial bargain was supposed to be temporary. When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, it was quickly agreed that some racial favoritism was justified to compensate for the black minority’s unequal starting point. The temporary nature of this favoritism was crucial to the deal. The imperative to treat citizens equally under the law was the moral claim on which the whole civil rights movement was based. Race-based remedies were only “transitional,” promised one chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and would “fall into disuse once the job is done.”

At the time, it was sincerely expected that black and white outcomes would converge. A study by the Urban Institute in 1971 extrapolated black progress over the previous eight years and predicted exactly when the catch-up would occur for various metrics such as poverty rates, college completion, and infant mortality. The one that would take the longest, life expectancy at thirty-five years, was predicted to reach white levels in 2019.

In 2003, Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor famously wrote, “We expect that twenty-five years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today,” in her decision in Grutter v. Bollinger upholding affirmative action at the University of Michigan. There were a handful of conservatives at the time who would have told her that this was optimistic, based on the available data, but these voices were marginalized as politically incorrect. The conventional wisdom was with Justice O’Connor.

Today, two years away from Justice O’Connor’s twenty-five-year deadline, the conventional wisdom has changed. Everyone can see that the long hoped-for convergence has not materialized. Affirmative action is still necessary to achieve colleges’ desired racial diversity. We have created a black middle class, but blacks from wealthy households on average still have lower SAT scores and lower credit scores than whites from poorer households. Large disparities in violent crime rates still persist, as do disparities in wealth, in part because houses in black neighborhoods still have persistently lower home values.

Both the left and the right have registered the stubbornness of these racial gaps. The recent popularity among liberals of radical authors such as Ibram X. Kendi, who proposed an amendment to the US Constitution prohibiting “racial inequity” and a new government agency to implement it, was a symptom of this disillusionment. As equality of opportunity recedes as a plausible goal for the civil rights regime, having failed to arrive after three generations, there is a growing market for pessimists like Kendi who want to shift the goal to equality of outcome.

So that is the situation we face: The old racial bargain is breaking down, due to a combination of changing demographics and a dawning realization that racial outcomes are not going to converge any time soon. One possible path forward is to throw out the old racial bargain and establish a new one based on equality under the law. The other possible path is to accept permanent racial favoritism at every level of society.

“The old racial bargain is breaking down.”

Monday, July 27, 2026

Trump's WWIII Crazy Train is Headed towards Moscow and Gaining Speed

Illya Novikov, Jill Colvin, & Volodymyr Yurchuk, "From a Kyiv bomb shelter, Laura Loomer explains her shift on Russia's war in Ukraine"


KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Laura Loomer became infamous for spreading conspiracy theories online. Now, as she travels across Ukraine to see the damage inflicted by Russia in its yearslong war, she wants to admit that she fell for some falsehoods of her own.

A close ally of President Donald Trump, Loomer has completely reversed her longtime criticism of Ukraine and is urging fellow conservatives to be wary of Moscow's propaganda, which she blames for duping large swaths of the American right.

"You don't need to listen to a podcaster and let them influence your opinion about a country. You can look at those facts yourself," she told The Associated Press in Kyiv shortly after returning from a trip close to the front line in Ukraine's east. The interview was supposed to take place in Loomer's hotel, but it had to be moved to the building's underground bomb shelter as the city faced another ballistic missile attack.

Loomer has remained influential with Trump despite not having an official role, and she said they spoke over the phone after she sat down with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. She also said that she expects to meet with Trump after returning from her trip.

Loomer's turnaround on Ukraine has been welcomed by the country's leaders, whose relationships with Trump have been strained at times. But it has also stirred confusion, surprise and suspicion in the United States. She continues to insist that Ukraine is not paying for her travels.

As Trump and Zelenskyy prepare to meet on Tuesday in Washington, Loomer said it's clear that her trip has already made a difference, refocusing attention on the war as Congress debates new sanctions intended to punish Russia.

"It's looking good for Ukraine, right?" she said. "Going into this meeting next week at the Oval Office is looking pretty good."

Loomer says she was 'bamboozled' to oppose Ukraine

Loomer had spent years minimizing the war and amplifying Russian propaganda until she made a dramatic reversal this week.

"I've come to realize I was bamboozled by Russian propaganda and I came to believe a lot of untrue things about Ukraine. I used to think that this was a country full of Nazis," Loomer told Zelenskyy as she interviewed him for her show on Rumble, an online video platform.

Loomer blamed her indoctrination on getting banned by American social media platforms, leading her to try Telegram, where Russian media is widely shared.

"The Russians," she added, "are very good at capitalizing on people's rage. And I was very angry," she said, recounting her feelings about the 2020 election, which she falsely maintains was stolen from Trump despite all evidence to the contrary.

She said her change in perspective had been gradual as she started to see podcasters like Tucker Carlson "turn on President Trump" while having their rhetoric amplified by Russian sources.

Loomer, who casts herself as an independent journalist, told the AP she believed her reversal was already changing minds within Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement.

"Oh, 100%," she said. "I've received messages all day from different people and media and politics and people just who follow me online who said, 'Wow, I didn't realize how much we've been lied to.' 'Wow you really opened my eyes.'"

Loomer was welcomed with open arms

Ukrainian officials seemed to recognize the opportunity to win over an ardent Trump ally with a large online following. In addition to her interview with Zelenskyy, Loomer had audiences with top Ukrainian officials and the country's chief rabbi.

"It takes courage to come to Ukraine and not be deterred by Russian propaganda or air raid sirens," Zelenskyy's office wrote on social media.

Loomer also got a tour of Dormition Cathedral of Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, a monastic complex that came under Russian attack last month.

"Laura is very powerful and she's very authoritative in the U.S., so I hope that everything she has seen by her own eyes will help her to spread the truth when she is back at the U.S.," Tetyana Berezhna, the deputy prime minister and Ukrainian minister of culture, told the AP. "I do really hope and I believe that her visit will have a huge impact on relations with the U.S. administration."

While some have tried to downplay Loomer's influence with the president, he has often followed her advice. She occasionally traveled with him during the 2024 campaign, and last year he purged his National Security Council staff after she raised concerns about their loyalty in an Oval Office meeting.

Trump appears to be tracking Loomer's trip, sharing video of her conversation with Zelenskyy on social media.

"Very good!!!" he wrote on Thursday evening.

The conspiracist denounces conspiracy theories

Loomer has a long history of spreading conspiracy theories. She once shared a video that called 9/11 an "inside job" and amplified a lie about Haitian immigrants eating dogs and cats in Ohio, which Trump went on to repeat during a presidential debate with Kamala Harris.

Although Loomer may have changed her mind about Russia's invasion, her bigoted views have not budged.

"One thing I really love about Ukraine is I haven't seen a single Muslim here," she posted on Saturday. "It's so refreshing."

But in the interview, she bemoaned how influential podcasters can spread misinformation.

Women's Sports: De Agony of da Feet!

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Outting Mamdani's Socialist Neo-Racism

The Structural Trouble Within the Democrat's Intersectional "Big Identity Politics Tent" whose Unifying Feature is Post-Colonial Anti-Europeanism/ Anti-whiteness

DSA - Mastering the Art of Political Virtue Signaling & Looksmaxxing
A focus on maxxing the homunculus while ignoring the rest of the neo-cortex

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

2008 - When the Black Identitarian Action Affirming Democratic Party Opened the Gates to Post-Colonialism and DEI

...and began to De-Colonize/ Eradicate their Former White European Colonizers (aka- Trump/ MAGA) and Began Enacting the Great Replacement (starting with "ballots" instead of "voters")_

The Future Democratic Party is Neo-Racist, Anti-White and Post-Colonial

...and Why Peter Thiel and the Billionaire Class are Developing an International Escapist "Plan B"
 

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) - White Supremacy Resurgent!

from Google AI:

Black activists criticized DSA Founder Michael Harrington for prioritizing economic "class-first" socialism over distinct civil rights issues. Prominent leaders argued his approach downplayed systemic anti-Black racism. They also condemned his close ties to labor unions during the 1968 New York City teachers' strike, which pitted white-dominated unions against Black community control initiatives.

Core Criticisms

  • Class Reductionism: Critics argued that Harrington’s economic focus on abolishing poverty erased the unique, lived experience of racial discrimination. They felt his framework reduced all Black suffering to economic inequality. 
  • Institutional Alliances: Harrington aligned closely with conservative labor leaders. Black activists viewed these unions as barriers that blocked Black Americans from jobs and fair housing. 
  • The 1968 Teachers' Strike: During this strike, Harrington supported the teachers' union. Many Black activists viewed the union's actions as a direct assault on Black self-determination in local schools.  
The Core Divide

Harrington believed that racial equality was impossible without first changing the capitalist system. He argued that a multiracial coalition, built primarily around the labor movement, was the only way to achieve lasting social change. 

In contrast, Black activists asserted that racism was deeply woven into American society. They argued that focusing solely on class failed to dismantle the white supremacy that existed in all aspects of daily life.

Historical Perspective

Harrington was a civil rights advocate who marched in the South and worked with Bayard Rustin. However, as the 1960s progressed, the Black Power movement emerged. Activists in this movement increasingly rejected the old socialist strategy of making civil rights wait for a broader economic revolution.  

Dr Martin Luther King, Jr to Michael Harrington, DSA Founder:
"Why, Mike, we never knew we were poor until we read your book."
Blue Collar - 4%
Return of the White Socialist Class Essentialist Vanguard?
...or DSA Succumbing to the Neo-Colonial Identitarianism of the Economically Neo-liberal Democratic Party?

Victims of the Capitalism of the World, Unite!
Become a Surplus Salaried Capitalist Toady!
Opportunities to Suck Up to Billionaires are Limited.
Reserve your DEI quota position in the Intersectional PMC Hierarchy today!
ps- Unionized Worker Class Essentialism is for suckers!
White Worker B*tches - "Suck it Up"!

Monday, July 20, 2026

Shareholder vs. Stakeholder Capitalism...

 ...when Neo-Fascists put a WEF DEI-ESG Compliance Nazi on your Corporate Board of Directors

from Google AI:

The German Stock Corporation Act of 1937 (Aktiengesetz 1937) legally shifted corporate focus away from shareholders toward the state. 

Alternatively, the legislative act that granted the Nazi regime total, sweeping control, is the Enabling Act of 1933. 

1. The Stock Corporation Act of 1937 (Aktiengesetz)

Historically, this is the most famous legal mandate linking corporate governance, "stakeholder" theory, and Nazi ideology.
  • The Shift: It officially stripped shareholders of their primacy.
  • The Law: It legally mandated that a company's board of directors must manage the enterprise not to maximize shareholder profit, but to serve the interests of the Volksgemeinschaft (the public good of the "people's community") and the Nazi state.
  • The Result: It stripped corporate democracy by giving the executive board absolute power over shareholders, effectively embedding the Nazi FĂĽhrerprinzip (leader principle) into corporate law.
2. The Enabling Act of 1933

If your query is about political stakeholders or structural control, the Enabling Act (Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich) is the foundational law of the regime.
  • The Law: Passed on March 23, 1933, it allowed Hitler’s cabinet to enact laws without the approval of parliament.
  • The Result: It legally dismantled the Weimar Republic, completely sidelined political opposition, and centralized absolute power.

3. Economic Exclusion Decrees

If you are looking for laws targeting specific corporate stakeholders based on ethnicity or nationality, the regime utilized several decrees:
  • The 1938 Decree for the Reporting of Jewish-Owned Property: Forced Jewish citizens and business stakeholders to register assets, paving the way for forced "Aryanization" and asset theft.
  • The 1938 Decree on the Elimination of the Jews from Economic Life: Completely barred specific demographics from holding stakes or operating businesses.
  • The 1940 Decree on Enemy Property: Allowed the state to appoint administrators to strip foreign shareholders of corporate control without consultation.

Groyper Anthems - The Anti-Racist Reaction is Here. Is it just more Neo-Racism? Or is it Finally Race Non-Essentialism?

Anti-Racism's "Other" Sister

–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship":
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”

The "Other" Thunberg Sister - Beata Monalisa

Sunday, July 19, 2026

$163,000+ per daily passenger. What a Deal!

from Google AI:
The Baltimore Metro SubwayLink (the heavy rail train line) cost a total of \(\$1.392\) billion to build when its final section finished in 1995. [1, 2]
This original \(15.4\)-mile system is now undergoing more than \(\$500\) million in modernizations and new train car purchases.

DSA: The Communist Trojan Horse?

Preach it, My Sister...

...on Neo-Racism (because Race is what is Essential to any Racist Group Identity, especially one that shrouds itself in victimhood)

If every last vestige of white racism were to disappear from the face of the Earth tomorrow, would blacks even know?  What would it do to black solidarity?  

My suspicion is "nothing".  It has become the "essence" of black culture, even if it is no longer the essence of black experience.  Much as Jewish historical persecution remains the essence of Zionism and European/ American support for Israel.  Jews are certainly no one's "victims" in the Middle East today, but the mythology of their anti-semitic motivated victimology remains a centerpiece of their Jewish identity today.

Saturday, July 18, 2026

James Lindsay: Shaming MAGA to the Neocon Dark Side... "If you're not pro-Israel, you're a woke anti-semite!"

James L: "Globalism is fine.  We just need to Go Harder with Hard Power and Our European and Israeli Allies!  Lindsey Graham was an American Hero!  Ukraine in NATO or Bust!  We didn't Vote for Trump the 1st time around, but WE know what MAGA is and Needs to be Now!  An Israeli Puppet!"  

James L: "Tucker was always Wokely(?) anti-Israel pushing the Curtis Yarvin/ SF Tech Bros Agenda instead of the Greater Israel Globalism Project!   He's not MAGA!  You gotta love Israel to be Not Woke!"

---

  You can't be a principled anti-DEI "Race Non-Essentialist" like Tucker or Candace?  You need to be SELECTIVELY race essentialist like James and the Nick Fuentes Groypers?  Are Jews and White Christian Zionists just as Essential on the Right as Palestinians and Blacks are essential on the Left?  

Woke really means to be selectively 'Race Essentialist'.  James be soooo Woke!

@@

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Nolan's Meta-Modern Odyssey

Gemini AI, "The Illusion Hidden Within Nolan's 'Odyssey'"

Fear: The Glue that Holds Non-Consanguinated Groups Together


Timestamps
00:00:00 Russophobia and anti-Semitism 
00:07:11 Nazi racism and colonial thinking 
00:13:25 Racism, essentialism and inequality 
00:19:29 Demodernization and private anger 
00:24:46 Why elites need enemies 
00:35:04 Stereotypes, diplomacy and deterrence 
00:46:51 Anti-Semitism, Israel and public debate 
00:54:09 Empire, culture and racism
The Heart of Love
Oikophobia: Internal Group Factional Fears and Scapegoating (Constructing the Internal & External Enemies)

Fear: The Kayfabe Pathos that Trumps Logos

Saturday, July 11, 2026

The Party of Race Essential Identities (Democrats) Doubles Down on Neo-Racist Settler Neo-Colonialism

"In the Name of Socialism We Must De-Colonize America!  Throw Out the Whites!"

Anti-"Racist" Democrats don't fight Racism Universally.  They are Racists who oppose White Europeans and decry "White Racism" (not the ethnic Racists and Settler Colonists among their own). In other words they are, and always have been, Racist Hypocrites!

"Abolish ICE, so the We Can Re-Colonize America!"
The Great Replacement isn't a Theory.  It's become a Practice (Praxis).

Being an Anti-Racist "Ally" Means to Ally Yourself with All the Non-European Races and Practice Anti-White Racism (Neo-Racism).  Ultimately, it's a Moloch Trap.

A "true" Anti-racist would fight racism in ALL it's forms, and not soley it's "white racist" form.  Stop being a Race Essentialist Democrat.  Become a Race Non-Essentialist MAGA (not Groyper) Republican today!  

Environment (Physical and Cultural) is Essential, not Race!  Environment (National) Produces Race through Evolutionary Environmental Adaptation and Genetic Selection for Physical and Cultural Fitness.  Race is an Emergent "Effect", not a "Cause".  As such, it is Non-Essential.