What about ICE anti-minority thuggery? Nobody should care about that? According to rightturds. But you'd be wrong about that. People are getting very angry about ICE thuggery. This would be ICE being masked and refusing to identify themselves, leaving the door open for bad actors to intimidate ICE agents. Also ICE beating people up and falsely accusing the people being assaulted of assaulting them. And going after people not accused or convicted of any crime, even though king donald said he would go after killers and drug dealers. Also the targeting of anyone with brown skin, even if they are US citizens. Naturally this thuggery is angering people. That is no surprise. If ICE would stop this, they'd have nothing to worry about.
US corporations invited them here by offering jobs. But it's ok if wealthy corporate owners break the law and bad if desperate people are lured here with jobs? You're seeking to punish the wrong people -- the victims instead of the perpetrators. But that's often what rightturds want to do.
They were all offered H1B visas by corporate sponsors and lured here? Who knew? i thought they just shuffled their own asses over the border.
btw - Democrats want to pass E-Verify now? Won't Congress people have to start paying SSN taxes for their illegal servants then? Doesn't sound very likely. Pelosi paying taxes on the help?
No, the corporations that hired them did not offer visas. They illegally hired them and broke the law. Everyone in Congress has illegal immigrant servants?
Via Copilot...
There is no credible evidence that Nancy Pelosi employs undocumented immigrants as domestic workers, nor that Congress as a whole is avoiding E-Verify due to personal staffing concerns. The claim in that blog comment appears to be speculative and conspiratorial, not grounded in verified reporting.
🧠 What We Know.
E-Verify is a federal program that allows employers to check the work eligibility of employees. It’s voluntary for most employers, though some states and federal contractors require it.
Congressional resistance to mandatory E-Verify has historically stemmed from concerns about...
Burdening small businesses.
False positives affecting legal workers.
Broader immigration reform priorities.
🕵️♀️ Claims About Pelosi.
No reputable source has reported that Nancy Pelosi employs undocumented workers.
Fact-checking outlets like PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated similar claims and found no substantiation.
Paul Pelosi didn't owe money to his attacker. And you brought up members of congress having "illegal immigrant servants", not the population at large. Looks like you realized your argument is BS and decided to "win" by moving the goalposts bigly.
Via Copilot...
🧠 What’s Verified.
David DePape is a Canadian citizen who was living in the U.S. at the time of the attack on Paul Pelosi in October 2022.
According to federal authorities, he overstayed his visa, which technically made him unlawfully present -- but that’s different from the inflammatory label “illegal immigrant” often used in political rhetoric.
There is no verified evidence that Paul Pelosi owed DePape money or that they had any prior relationship. That claim appears to be fabricated speculation, not grounded in the criminal investigation or court proceedings.
⚖️ Legal Context.
DePape was charged with attempted kidnapping and assault, and his motivations were described as politically extremist, not financial.
The FBI and DOJ documents do not mention any debt or personal connection between DePape and Pelosi.
There’s no credible evidence that Paul Pelosi told police to “go away” before being attacked. In fact, the opposite is true.
According to court records, video footage, and police reports from the October 28, 2022 incident, Paul Pelosi made a 911 call while the intruder, David DePape, was in the house. When officers arrived, Pelosi was struggling with DePape over control of a hammer. The attack occurred in front of the police, moments after they entered the home.
The notion that Pelosi tried to dismiss the officers appears to be a distortion or fabrication. It’s not supported by any of the official evidence presented in court or reported by reputable sources. The attacker, DePape, was immediately arrested and later convicted on multiple federal and state charges, including attempted murder and aggravated kidnapping.
If Thersites’ comment is part of a broader mythic or satirical framework, it might be worth dissecting its rhetorical function. But as a factual claim, it doesn’t hold up.
13 comments:
What about ICE anti-minority thuggery? Nobody should care about that? According to rightturds. But you'd be wrong about that. People are getting very angry about ICE thuggery. This would be ICE being masked and refusing to identify themselves, leaving the door open for bad actors to intimidate ICE agents. Also ICE beating people up and falsely accusing the people being assaulted of assaulting them. And going after people not accused or convicted of any crime, even though king donald said he would go after killers and drug dealers. Also the targeting of anyone with brown skin, even if they are US citizens. Naturally this thuggery is angering people. That is no surprise. If ICE would stop this, they'd have nothing to worry about.
Tell you what, Derv. If the Black Bloc de-masks, then ICE dem-masks. Sound fair? I hope that ICE micro-chips all you Antifa mfers!
We have laws that separate the good guys from the bad guys. If the illegals followed the laws, they wouldn't need to worry about ICE.
...they'd self-deport.
US corporations invited them here by offering jobs. But it's ok if wealthy corporate owners break the law and bad if desperate people are lured here with jobs? You're seeking to punish the wrong people -- the victims instead of the perpetrators. But that's often what rightturds want to do.
They were all offered H1B visas by corporate sponsors and lured here? Who knew? i thought they just shuffled their own asses over the border.
btw - Democrats want to pass E-Verify now? Won't Congress people have to start paying SSN taxes for their illegal servants then? Doesn't sound very likely. Pelosi paying taxes on the help?
No, the corporations that hired them did not offer visas. They illegally hired them and broke the law. Everyone in Congress has illegal immigrant servants?
Via Copilot...
There is no credible evidence that Nancy Pelosi employs undocumented immigrants as domestic workers, nor that Congress as a whole is avoiding E-Verify due to personal staffing concerns. The claim in that blog comment appears to be speculative and conspiratorial, not grounded in verified reporting.
🧠 What We Know.
E-Verify is a federal program that allows employers to check the work eligibility of employees. It’s voluntary for most employers, though some states and federal contractors require it.
Congressional resistance to mandatory E-Verify has historically stemmed from concerns about...
Burdening small businesses.
False positives affecting legal workers.
Broader immigration reform priorities.
🕵️♀️ Claims About Pelosi.
No reputable source has reported that Nancy Pelosi employs undocumented workers.
Fact-checking outlets like PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated similar claims and found no substantiation.
[end]
lol! I lived in California. EVERYONE pays illegals to do their dirty work cheap. Just drive into any Home Depot parking lot.
...otherwise there wouldn't be 10's of millions of illegals in the US. Duh!
ps - Who was Paul Pelosi's attacker again? Oh yeah, a p*ssed off undocumented immigrant.
Should have paid your bills, Paul.
Paul Pelosi didn't owe money to his attacker. And you brought up members of congress having "illegal immigrant servants", not the population at large. Looks like you realized your argument is BS and decided to "win" by moving the goalposts bigly.
Via Copilot...
🧠 What’s Verified.
David DePape is a Canadian citizen who was living in the U.S. at the time of the attack on Paul Pelosi in October 2022.
According to federal authorities, he overstayed his visa, which technically made him unlawfully present -- but that’s different from the inflammatory label “illegal immigrant” often used in political rhetoric.
There is no verified evidence that Paul Pelosi owed DePape money or that they had any prior relationship. That claim appears to be fabricated speculation, not grounded in the criminal investigation or court proceedings.
⚖️ Legal Context.
DePape was charged with attempted kidnapping and assault, and his motivations were described as politically extremist, not financial.
The FBI and DOJ documents do not mention any debt or personal connection between DePape and Pelosi.
[end]
So why was this illegal at Pelosi's house? And why did Paul try to convince the responding cops to "go away"?
Via Copilot...
There’s no credible evidence that Paul Pelosi told police to “go away” before being attacked. In fact, the opposite is true.
According to court records, video footage, and police reports from the October 28, 2022 incident, Paul Pelosi made a 911 call while the intruder, David DePape, was in the house. When officers arrived, Pelosi was struggling with DePape over control of a hammer. The attack occurred in front of the police, moments after they entered the home.
The notion that Pelosi tried to dismiss the officers appears to be a distortion or fabrication. It’s not supported by any of the official evidence presented in court or reported by reputable sources. The attacker, DePape, was immediately arrested and later convicted on multiple federal and state charges, including attempted murder and aggravated kidnapping.
If Thersites’ comment is part of a broader mythic or satirical framework, it might be worth dissecting its rhetorical function. But as a factual claim, it doesn’t hold up.
[End]
Post a Comment