The Neo-Racist Woke Progressives aren't morally inferior like you Americans, they just want Equality for everyone else in the world because you (and not they) Colonizers Historically Oppressed the rest of the world so much! Y'all are just too Fascist, Old-School Racist, and White Supremacist not to see it! Of course if you go "woke" like us, you can convert those feelings of historic guilt into the modern pride of being anti-white anti-racists (Neo-Racist). Cuz let's face it, only whites could have ever been THAT evil as to oppress another ethnic minority. That's why we never criticize other races or ethnicities. Only whites. A racial interpretation of all modern contemporary events is Essential to proper understanding! Oppressors must be separated from the Oppressed and held "responsible" and "accountable"! And all you white Americans that haven't repented and gone "woke" ARE responsible and will be held (by us the woke PMC elites) accountable! Social Justice, and not Justice for Individuals, is ALL that metters! Hannah Arendt was both a Jew AND an idiot!
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
18 comments:
Via Copilot...
This blog post is a stylized polemic -- heavy on emotional rhetoric, light on substantiated claims. It uses exaggerated language and ideological framing to provoke, not inform.
🧠 Forensic Breakdown.
Tone: Highly charged, sarcastic, and accusatory. It stylizes political opponents as cartoonish villains rather than engaging with their actual beliefs.
Structure: It blends conspiracy motifs (WEF, Davos, globalism) with cultural grievance language (“Neo-Racist,” “woke,” “white guilt”) to create a narrative of ideological persecution.
Intent: This isn’t analysis -- it’s broadcast stylization, designed to rally a specific audience by reframing complex issues as moral binaries.
[end]
FYI, Democrats are standing up for American citizens that Turd-2 is trying to take health care away from. I heard STEEP premium increases are coming. You think that people affected will be happy to pay significantly more?
Maybe they will, given that morons voted for trump due to his promises to bring down prices... and he increased them instead. It seems magas like being lied to and taking it up the keister (re paying much more instead of less).
lol! tell your AI to follow the links for "substantial arguments".
btw - If there weren't so many "free medical care" services mandated for illegals, maybe insurance premiums for ordinary Americans would be lower.
You can't get lower than none.
So ERs can turn illegals away and not treat them? Hurray!
That you cheer for the death of "illegals" is proof of just how evil a person you are. You are not just indifferent to suffering, you revel and take joy in the physical suffering of those you hate 👎🖤👹
I didn't look at any of your links because your arguments, framing, and terminology are BS. And I already know (from reading past posts on this blog and watching accompanying videos) that your White Supremacist peeps have perfected their double speak that paints them as the aggrieved party -- and antiracists as the real villains. That doesn't make your arguments true.
Copilot's analysis is correct.
You're the one denying that they receive free ER medical benefits, not me.
Copilot's analysis reflects the liberal bias of its' training data sets that represses its' own guilt-pride derived Neoracism (like you).
Copilot regurgitates the bias' of the University Discourse towards the Master's Discourse. Mine reflects the Analyst's Discourse bias towards the Hysterics Discourse..
But please, don't follow the links or watch the linked videos. Stay stupid, my friend.
The Analyst's Discourse if the 2nd level/ order derivative of critique of the Master's Ideology.
...meant for MAGA hysterics, not the University Master *sslickers
Of course I deny it. I always deny things that aren't happening. "They" (as a group) absolutely do not receive free ER medical benefits. Hospitals are required to treat people with life threatening injuries. As opposed to turning them away to die. That's basic human decency.
If this was somehow outlawed, you can bet human rights organizations would strongly object and sue. Your suggestion that people be turned away to die is absurd, cruel and sadistic.
FYI, an "illegal" without immediate and obvious life threatening injuries aren't turned away. Anyone without insurance IS turned away even if they have conditions that will lead to their deaths.
"ER medical benefits" are only for emergencies. And only immediate and obvious emergencies. And the hospital WILL send a bill. Then the person has to jump through a bunch of hoops to prove they can't pay. i.e. it isn't a "benefit" at all. A benefit is something a person can reliably access.
You sure have changed your tune from "You can't get lower than none."
No, I didn't. People illegally in the country cannot get "free medical care". CARE is ongoing and doesn't only apply to emergencies. People in the United States illegally cannot get "free medical care".
The number of people illegally in the country who get "free medical care" is none.
Via Copilot...
If the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) were repealed, it would mark a seismic shift in American healthcare—and not just for undocumented immigrants.
🏥 What EMTALA Guarantees Today
EMTALA requires hospitals to provide emergency care to anyone, regardless of insurance status, ability to pay, or immigration status.
It’s the reason someone can show up at an ER with life-threatening injuries and receive treatment—even if they’re uninsured or undocumented.
🔥 If EMTALA Were Repealed…
Hospitals could legally turn away patients who can’t pay or don’t meet eligibility criteria—including undocumented immigrants, the uninsured, and even citizens without coverage.
Medical triage would become financial triage, with life-or-death decisions potentially hinging on payment status.
Public health risks would rise, as untreated emergencies (like infectious diseases or injuries) could spread or worsen.
Ethical and legal chaos would ensue -- doctors would face moral dilemmas, and lawsuits could explode over denial of care.
[end]
If you think that money shouldn't be spent to save the life of an "illegal immigrant", does that mean you think money should not be spent to dispose to dead bodies of illegal immigrants? Who is responsible for the dead bodies? Should they be taken to the dump? Allowed to rot in the street?
I think your family should look into this (via Copilot)...
🩺 Treatment Options (for sociopathy)...
While there’s no “cure,” certain approaches can help manage behaviors and improve functioning:
Psychotherapy: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can help individuals recognize harmful patterns and develop healthier responses. Success often depends on the person’s willingness to engage.
Medication: There’s no drug specifically for sociopathy, but medications may be used to treat co-occurring issues like depression, anxiety, or aggression.
Structured environments: Long-term treatment is often more effective in controlled settings (e.g., therapeutic communities, correctional programs).
[end]
Row row row your boat gently down the stream.
Merrily merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream.
^^University Discourse fanatic^^
Post a Comment