2008 - When the Black Identitarian Action Affirming Democratic Party Opened the Gates to Post-Colonialism and DEI

...and began to De-Colonize/ Eradicate their Former White European Colonizers (aka- Trump/ MAGA) and Began Enacting the Great Replacement (starting with "ballots" instead of "voters")_

The Future Democratic Party is Neo-Racist, Anti-White and Post-Colonial

...and Why Peter Thiel and the Billionaire Class are Developing an International Escapist "Plan B"

 

The DSA Platform

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) - White Supremacy Resurgent!

White supremacy comes in all forms. https://t.co/w4qyN2Lip7

— Donovan Richards Jr. (@DRichardsQNS) July 20, 2026

from Google AI:

Black activists criticized DSA Founder Michael Harrington for prioritizing economic "class-first" socialism over distinct civil rights issues. Prominent leaders argued his approach downplayed systemic anti-Black racism. They also condemned his close ties to labor unions during the 1968 New York City teachers' strike, which pitted white-dominated unions against Black community control initiatives.

Core Criticisms

• Class Reductionism: Critics argued that Harrington’s economic focus on abolishing poverty erased the unique, lived experience of racial discrimination. They felt his framework reduced all Black suffering to economic inequality. 
• Institutional Alliances: Harrington aligned closely with conservative labor leaders. Black activists viewed these unions as barriers that blocked Black Americans from jobs and fair housing. 
• The 1968 Teachers' Strike: During this strike, Harrington supported the teachers' union. Many Black activists viewed the union's actions as a direct assault on Black self-determination in local schools.  

The Core Divide

Harrington believed that racial equality was impossible without first changing the capitalist system. He argued that a multiracial coalition, built primarily around the labor movement, was the only way to achieve lasting social change. 

In contrast, Black activists asserted that racism was deeply woven into American society. They argued that focusing solely on class failed to dismantle the white supremacy that existed in all aspects of daily life.

Historical Perspective

Harrington was a civil rights advocate who marched in the South and worked with Bayard Rustin. However, as the 1960s progressed, the Black Power movement emerged. Activists in this movement increasingly rejected the old socialist strategy of making civil rights wait for a broader economic revolution.  

Dr Martin Luther King, Jr to Michael Harrington, DSA Founder:

"Why, Mike, we never knew we were poor until we read your book."

Blue Collar - 4%

Return of the White Socialist Class Essentialist Vanguard?

...or DSA Succumbing to the Neo-Colonial Identitarianism of the Economically Neo-liberal Democratic Party?

Victims of the Capitalism of the World, Unite!

Become a Surplus Salaried Capitalist Toady!

Opportunities to Suck Up to Billionaires are Limited.

Reserve your DEI quota position in the Intersectional PMC Hierarchy today!

ps- Unionized Worker Class Essentialism is for suckers!

White Worker B*tches - "Suck it Up"!

Shareholder vs. Stakeholder Capitalism...

 ...when Neo-Fascists put a WEF DEI-ESG Compliance Nazi on your Corporate Board of Directors

from Google AI:

The German Stock Corporation Act of 1937 (Aktiengesetz 1937) legally shifted corporate focus away from shareholders toward the state. 

Alternatively, the legislative act that granted the Nazi regime total, sweeping control, is the Enabling Act of 1933. 

1. The Stock Corporation Act of 1937 (Aktiengesetz)

Historically, this is the most famous legal mandate linking corporate governance, "stakeholder" theory, and Nazi ideology.

• The Shift: It officially stripped shareholders of their primacy.
• The Law: It legally mandated that a company's board of directors must manage the enterprise not to maximize shareholder profit, but to serve the interests of the Volksgemeinschaft (the public good of the "people's community") and the Nazi state.
• The Result: It stripped corporate democracy by giving the executive board absolute power over shareholders, effectively embedding the Nazi Führerprinzip (leader principle) into corporate law.

2. The Enabling Act of 1933

If your query is about political stakeholders or structural control, the Enabling Act (Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich) is the foundational law of the regime.

• The Law: Passed on March 23, 1933, it allowed Hitler’s cabinet to enact laws without the approval of parliament.
• The Result: It legally dismantled the Weimar Republic, completely sidelined political opposition, and centralized absolute power.

3. Economic Exclusion Decrees

If you are looking for laws targeting specific corporate stakeholders based on ethnicity or nationality, the regime utilized several decrees:

• The 1938 Decree for the Reporting of Jewish-Owned Property: Forced Jewish citizens and business stakeholders to register assets, paving the way for forced "Aryanization" and asset theft.
• The 1938 Decree on the Elimination of the Jews from Economic Life: Completely barred specific demographics from holding stakes or operating businesses.
• The 1940 Decree on Enemy Property: Allowed the state to appoint administrators to strip foreign shareholders of corporate control without consultation.

Groyper Anthems - The Anti-Racist Reaction is Here. Is it just more Neo-Racism? Or is it Finally Race Non-Essentialism?

Anti-Racism's "Other" Sister

–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship":

“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”

The "Other" Thunberg Sister - Beata Monalisa

$163,000+ per daily passenger. What a Deal!

from Google AI:

The Baltimore Metro SubwayLink (the heavy rail train line) cost a total of \(\$1.392\) billion to build when its final section finished in 1995. [1, 2]

This original \(15.4\)-mile system is now undergoing more than \(\$500\) million in modernizations and new train car purchases.

DSA: The Communist Trojan Horse?

Preach it, My Sister...

...on Neo-Racism (because Race is what is Essential to any Racist Group Identity, especially one that shrouds itself in victimhood)

If every last vestige of white racism were to disappear from the face of the Earth tomorrow, would blacks even know?  What would it do to black solidarity?  

My suspicion is "nothing".  It has become the "essence" of black culture, even if it is no longer the essence of black experience.  Much as Jewish historical persecution remains the essence of Zionism and European/ American support for Israel.  Jews are certainly no one's "victims" in the Middle East today, but the mythology of their anti-semitic motivated victimology remains a centerpiece of their Jewish identity today.

James Lindsay: Shaming MAGA to the Neocon Dark Side... "If you're not pro-Israel, you're a woke anti-semite!"

James L: "Globalism is fine.  We just need to Go Harder with Hard Power and Our European and Israeli Allies!  Lindsey Graham was an American Hero!  Ukraine in NATO or Bust!  We didn't Vote for Trump the 1st time around, but WE know what MAGA is and Needs to be Now!  An Israeli Puppet!"  

James L: "Tucker was always Wokely(?) anti-Israel pushing the Curtis Yarvin/ SF Tech Bros Agenda instead of the Greater Israel Globalism Project!   He's not MAGA!  You gotta love Israel to be Not Woke!"

---

  You can't be a principled anti-DEI "Race Non-Essentialist" like Tucker or Candace?  You need to be SELECTIVELY race essentialist like James and the Nick Fuentes Groypers?  Are Jews and White Christian Zionists just as Essential on the Right as Palestinians and Blacks are essential on the Left?  

Woke really means to be selectively 'Race Essentialist'.  James be soooo Woke!

@@

Nolan's Meta-Modern Odyssey

Gemini AI, "The Illusion Hidden Within Nolan's 'Odyssey'"

Fear: The Glue that Holds Non-Consanguinated Groups Together

On Yakov Rabkin (his website)

Timestamps: 

00:00:00 Russophobia and anti-Semitism 

00:07:11 Nazi racism and colonial thinking 

00:13:25 Racism, essentialism and inequality 

00:19:29 Demodernization and private anger 

00:24:46 Why elites need enemies 

00:35:04 Stereotypes, diplomacy and deterrence 

00:46:51 Anti-Semitism, Israel and public debate 

00:54:09 Empire, culture and racism

The Heart of Love

Oikophobia: Internal Group Factional Fears and Scapegoating (Constructing the Internal & External Enemies)

Fear: The Kayfabe Pathos that Trumps Logos

Fools Overtures?

This House Would... Rather go to War with Russia than Lose Ukraine?

The Party of Race Essential Identities (Democrats) Doubles Down on Neo-Racist Settler Neo-Colonialism

"In the Name of Socialism We Must De-Colonize America!  Throw Out the Whites!"

Anti-"Racist" Democrats don't fight Racism Universally.  They are Racists who oppose White Europeans and decry "White Racism" (not the ethnic Racists and Settler Colonists among their own). In other words they are, and always have been, Racist Hypocrites!

"Abolish ICE, so the We Can Re-Colonize America!"

The Great Replacement isn't a Theory.  It's become a Practice (Praxis).

Being an Anti-Racist "Ally" Means to Ally Yourself with All the Non-European Races and Practice Anti-White Racism (Neo-Racism).  Ultimately, it's a Moloch Trap.

A "true" Anti-racist would fight racism in ALL it's forms, and not soley it's "white racist" form.  Stop being a Race Essentialist Democrat.  Become a Race Non-Essentialist MAGA (not Groyper) Republican today!  

Environment (Physical and Cultural) is Essential, not Race!  Environment (National) Produces Race through Evolutionary Environmental Adaptation and Genetic Selection for Physical and Cultural Fitness.  Race is an Emergent "Effect", not a "Cause".  As such, it is Non-Essential.

Driving Straight to Crazy town...

h/t - Woodsterman

A Cord of New Woodsterman Memes...

 

The 2-Tier Keir Police State

A Focus on Race Essentialist Policing- aka Defund the Police logic!

De-Colonize the Police!  Post-Colonialism forever!

Is the WNBA Marketing a Race War?

...or is it all just in girlie Kayfabe fun?

When Race Essentialism Becomes a Feature, NOT a Bug

"Rage generates more clicks than hope, so we use it as a shortcut to garner attention online,"

-Jon Acuff

Why Are there so Many Somali's in Minnesota?

Haitians in Springfield, OH?

What it Means to Identify as a Progressive Today

America 250...

...Elvis, with Democracy, have Left the building (AI Gen)

Signs of Ideological Confusion...

...Norman Finkelstein isn't wrong!  Is Tucker playing a reverse race-essentialism game (Groyperism)?  Or is he exposing the roots of race-essentialism in Anti-Semitism?  G_d's "chosen" people... (as affirmed by the Xtian Zionists).  IS there no truth in Jewish and Race-Essentialist Stereotypes?  Usurious, pushy, arrogant, superior, etc.?  Should the word anti-Semitism be withdrawn and the words "race-essentialist" replace it?  It would extend the concept more Universally and thereby force the speaker to mind his own position when extending the charge (especially Jews themselves).

Signs of Institutional Panic...

...ignoring the Underlying Conspiracy (bomb plot) in Nancy Pelosi's J6 Parliamentary Coup d'etat

Has the Internet Broken Institutional Gatekeeping?

...or Just the Institutions Themselves?

TPUSA has fallen, the Republican Party has fallen (mostly), The Democratic Party is falling (Mamdani).  Who's next?

...or is this all just a lull before the Techbro AIs more actively take over and start shouting everyone down?

Showdown of the Left v. Right Institutionalists

Protecting the Uni-Party Institutions from Populism

Meda Parameswara Reddy, "The Institutionalist Who Broke the Institution: Joe Biden's Tragic Legacy"

Joe Biden was a paradox, for he both honored and flagrantly disrespected the institutions he served.

The news arrived with the weight of inevitability. Jill Biden confirmed publicly what few had said plainly: former President Joe Biden is living with advanced, stage 4 prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. At 83, the diagnosis is incurable. The moment commands genuine human empathy, and it deserves it.

But empathy and historical honesty are not mutually exclusive. For the independent analytical observer, Biden's career presents a profound paradox — a man who built his entire public identity on institutional decency and democratic principle, only to undermine both in his final political act. History rarely affords a cleaner case study in the gap between projected virtue and practiced power.

To understand the full weight of Biden's legacy, one must start where his reputation was most earned. During the 1991 Senate confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, Biden presided as Judiciary Committee Chairman with visible command. His objectivity, procedural discipline, and adherence to legislative decorum were genuine. Here was the old-school institutionalist at his best: fair, deliberate, and deeply respectful of the system he served.

Yet this institutional mastery masked a persistent electoral weakness. Whenever Biden stepped away from the committee room and asked voters to choose him on his own merits, they declined — consistently. In his early presidential bids, he failed to capture even one percent of the Democratic primary vote. Insiders respected his process; the broader electorate did not see a natural national leader.

Biden's transformation into a national figure came not through the electorate but through Barack Obama's selection of him as Vice President. A behavioral shift followed almost immediately — Biden could suddenly be seen sprinting to podiums, a deliberate optic broadcasting energy and vitality to compensate for a career defined by age and frequent verbal miscues.

The deeper calculation surfaced at the end of the Obama presidency. A sitting Vice President is the natural heir apparent. Yet Biden hesitated, publicly citing the loss of his son Beau to cancer — a grief that was real and deserved respect. But the analytical record reveals a parallel truth: Hillary Clinton had nearly beaten Obama himself and had built an unstoppable primary machine. Biden, with his sub-1% primary history, faced a genuine prospect of humiliating defeat as sitting Vice President. Sitting out 2016 was not only grief. It was also calculated self-preservation.

When Biden finally won the presidency, the chasm between his projected decency and his actual exercise of power widened steadily. He repeatedly denounced Donald Trump for degrading democratic norms, while himself proclaiming he would have taken Trump "behind the gym" in high school. The rhetoric of the principled institutionalist and the rhetoric of the street brawler rarely acknowledge each other. Biden deployed both without apparent awareness of the contradiction.

More consequential was his handling of his family. For years he dismissed documented evidence surrounding Hunter Biden's financial dealings and personal conduct. Then, in his final weeks in office, he issued a sweeping preemptive pardon covering a decade of potential offenses — and justified it by claiming "raw politics" had infected the justice system. The man who had spent four years insisting he respected the Department of Justice's independence used the rawest executive power available to shield his son from it. In doing so, he dismantled his own central argument.

The most consequential gamble came in 2024. Having built his reelection rationale on the declaration that "democracy is on the ballot," Biden fiercely resisted public alarm about his cognitive acuity — until a nationally televised debate made denial impossible. Under intense backroom pressure, he withdrew.

What followed was the most revealing act of his career. Rather than calling for an open primary and letting Democratic voters choose their nominee, Biden instantly anointed Kamala Harris. Not a single popular vote was cast. The self-proclaimed defender of democratic process presided in silence over its bypass — a party coronation driven by elite calculation, not voter will. Subsequent analysis has documented how that decision fractured the coalition and contributed directly to defeat.

History rarely renders flat judgments. Biden will be remembered as a man of genuine institutional capability — the composed chairman of a historic 1991 hearing, a long-serving public servant now facing an incurable illness with quiet dignity. That is real, and it counts.

But history will also record the cold calculus. A leader who wrapped himself in constitutional principle for decades, then set it aside when the stakes became personal — to protect his son, to protect his party's grip on power, to avoid transparency about his own fitness for office. In pursuing historical greatness through a final series of high-stakes gambles, Joe Biden damaged the very asset he had spent a lifetime building: his reputation as a man who put the institution above himself. That tension — between the man he genuinely was and the calculations he ultimately made — is the defining story of his long career. No diagnosis changes it. Both are true, and history will hold both.