Turns out that opposing Multi-Culturalism isn't "Racism" (as the anti-white Neo-Racists/ Neo-Colonialists would have you believe), after all. It's about having a singular (and therefore easily and understandable and consistent) Rule of Law in which the ethnic culture of place of birth/ origin/ ethnicity is non-essential to social and economic cooperation within a State. Mono-Culturalism (Race Non-Essentialism) deconstructs the currently existing Tower of Babel (Multicultural) State and places it upon a firm foundation again. Of course the Neo-Racists all call this "White Supremacy" by forever aiming their "Post-Colonial Critical Theories" solely at European whites.
“Postcolonialism is the invention of rich Indian guys who wanted to make a good career in the west by playing on the guilt of white liberals”― Slavoj Žižek
After all, the objective aim and invisible doctrine of Capitalism is to "commodify" land, labour, information, and Capital. Mono-Culture is an obstacle to that project, especially when it serves to protect the sovereignty of the whole of People who have both created and adopted the morality of that culture and protect it from foreign and domestic exploitative Neoliberal Multi-cultural corporate business interests and ethics established beyond the State, yet operating within and often attempting to commoditize its' government by privatizing its' public goods or publicize its' own losses/ debts.
6 comments:
"Turns out that opposing Multi-Culturalism isn't "Racism" (as the anti-white Neo-Racists/ Neo-Colonialists would have you believe)..."
Agreed. And yet you keep trying to convince us it is.
FYI, your post contains some mistakes. The above should read, "as the pro-white Supremacy Racists/Neo-Colonialists would have you believe".
Why would they oppose multi-culturalism then?
Because you are redefining what "multi-culturalism" is. You support your redefined version and oppose the real version.
Via Copilot...
🧨 The Inversion: White Identity as Marginalized.
Some white conservatives reframe multiculturalism as a zero-sum game -- where elevating non-white cultures means suppressing white culture.
This leads to claims of “reverse discrimination”, especially in education, media, and hiring practices.
The emotional logic here is one of cultural displacement -- a fear that traditional norms (e.g., Christianity, English language, European heritage) are being crowded out.
[end]
"Multi-culturalism", to you, is shifting the focus to white cultures. This is clearly the strategy you are ALL IN on... redefining terms like "racism", "sexism", etc (by adding "neo" in front of them). Also "race non-essentialism" and "multi-culturalism" to give them new meanings (now they mean the opposite of what they previously did!)
You do this because there are a lot of morons and extremely dishonest people on the right. They are truly deplorables, as HRC correctly labeled you.
Maybe I should stick to re-defining marriage instead of "nationalism", right Derv?
Marriage is a contract between two people. Why should anyone care who the two people are?
Rightturds want to redfine it as exclusively as between one man and one woman, due to their hate. I definitely think you should not stick to that.
Marriage is a staple of state power.
Post a Comment