Minus: You just can't acknowledge the DNC's unwritten rule, you're too afraid of the dark....
No.
Minus: It's why you must insult whites who don't share your "everyone can have faults but whites" neoracist guilt-pride.
wtf? Don't you mean "everyone has faults, especially whites"? I mean, as per your delusions about "neoracists"? I think that "everyone can have faults but whites", is what you believe. At least White trumpers -- they have no faults due to being the "master race".
Don't White liberals have the most faults? The primary one being that they are "race traitors" and have "white guilt pride".
btw...
A recent Economist/YouGov poll found that 46% of Americans believe Donald Trump was involved in crimes allegedly committed by Jeffrey Epstein, while 32% said no, and 23% were unsure.
Here’s how it breaks down...
🟦 Democrats: A whopping 80% believe Trump was involved.
🟥 Republicans: Only 11% agree, but 21% say they’re not sure -- suggesting some cracks in the usual partisan wall.
🟨 Independents: About 47% think he was involved.
Beyond that, 67% of respondents believe the government is covering up evidence related to the Epstein case, and only 21% approve of how Trump has handled the investigation.
So yes -- whether or not there’s any legal implication, the public perception is politically damaging. It’s a reminder of how association, even without formal charges, can shape a narrative. (via copilot).
It's why Derv must insult whites who don't share their "everyone can have faults but whites" neoracist guilt-pride. He no longer believes in his own "universalism"... and see's whites in terms of "exceptionalism".
You say "especially whites" because you believe them, as a group, to be the exception from all other cultural groups. They are not "morally superior" (as you believe yourself to be) because they do not practice the "Pauline Exception" sufficiently and "linguistically lower themselves" socially sufficiently. Their guilt is therefore, "insufficient" and must be admonished by the morally prideful, such as yourself.
White liberals pretend to be "universalists" except for the moral arena. It's there that they throw Western Culture under the bus in a self-serving attempt to be perceived as having "unbiased judgement". Their subsequent expressed judgement is anything BUT unbiased. It's always "affirmative" towards non-Western cultures.
I have never insulted Whites who think "everyone can have faults but whites" due to neoracist guilt-pride. Because those Whites are imaginary. Insulting someone who is imaginary would be an exercise in futility.
Minus: Is Epstein-Trump gossip "the current thing" this week?
You hope. But it definitely appears as though this is an issue that won't go away. And this topic isn't a winner for donald trump. LOL. I hope everyone involved gets exposed. No matter who it is. If donald trump is implicated but then says the evidence that implicates him is "not credible", people are going to call BS. Barack Obama didn't make it up but then not use it.
donald can't make up his mind if James Brennan, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden made up "non credible" evidence implicating him and slipping the made up stuff into the Epstein files -- or -- if they didn't use any evidence implicating him because it doesn't exist. While I would think he is in a position to know and that he could therefore pick a reason.
14 comments:
Given that "neo-racism" is imaginary, I say it's you seeking to slay invisible dragons.
You just can't acknowledge the DNC's unwritten rule, you're too afraid of the dark....
Well Dervish, we know "neo-racism" is an imaginary label dreamt up by white supremacist in an attempt to cover over their systemic racism.
You just can't cope with your own inability to live up to Western Standards, Les.
Universal, not culturally specific and biased standards, like Kantian Categorical Imperatives.
What a Moron you are!
YOU ARE AN IDIOT
Minus: You just can't acknowledge the DNC's unwritten rule, you're too afraid of the dark....
No.
Minus: It's why you must insult whites who don't share your "everyone can have faults but whites" neoracist guilt-pride.
wtf? Don't you mean "everyone has faults, especially whites"? I mean, as per your delusions about "neoracists"? I think that "everyone can have faults but whites", is what you believe. At least White trumpers -- they have no faults due to being the "master race".
Don't White liberals have the most faults? The primary one being that they are "race traitors" and have "white guilt pride".
btw...
A recent Economist/YouGov poll found that 46% of Americans believe Donald Trump was involved in crimes allegedly committed by Jeffrey Epstein, while 32% said no, and 23% were unsure.
Here’s how it breaks down...
🟦 Democrats: A whopping 80% believe Trump was involved.
🟥 Republicans: Only 11% agree, but 21% say they’re not sure -- suggesting some cracks in the usual partisan wall.
🟨 Independents: About 47% think he was involved.
Beyond that, 67% of respondents believe the government is covering up evidence related to the Epstein case, and only 21% approve of how Trump has handled the investigation.
So yes -- whether or not there’s any legal implication, the public perception is politically damaging. It’s a reminder of how association, even without formal charges, can shape a narrative. (via copilot).
It's why Derv must insult whites who don't share their "everyone can have faults but whites" neoracist guilt-pride. He no longer believes in his own "universalism"... and see's whites in terms of "exceptionalism".
You say "especially whites" because you believe them, as a group, to be the exception from all other cultural groups. They are not "morally superior" (as you believe yourself to be) because they do not practice the "Pauline Exception" sufficiently and "linguistically lower themselves" socially sufficiently. Their guilt is therefore, "insufficient" and must be admonished by the morally prideful, such as yourself.
White liberals pretend to be "universalists" except for the moral arena. It's there that they throw Western Culture under the bus in a self-serving attempt to be perceived as having "unbiased judgement". Their subsequent expressed judgement is anything BUT unbiased. It's always "affirmative" towards non-Western cultures.
btw - Is Epstein-Trump gossip "the current thing" this week? George Soros does really love his Reflexive Alchemies...
How I love watching Dervish take on jc. Great entertainment.
I have never insulted Whites who think "everyone can have faults but whites" due to neoracist guilt-pride. Because those Whites are imaginary. Insulting someone who is imaginary would be an exercise in futility.
Minus: Is Epstein-Trump gossip "the current thing" this week?
You hope. But it definitely appears as though this is an issue that won't go away. And this topic isn't a winner for donald trump. LOL. I hope everyone involved gets exposed. No matter who it is. If donald trump is implicated but then says the evidence that implicates him is "not credible", people are going to call BS. Barack Obama didn't make it up but then not use it.
donald can't make up his mind if James Brennan, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden made up "non credible" evidence implicating him and slipping the made up stuff into the Epstein files -- or -- if they didn't use any evidence implicating him because it doesn't exist. While I would think he is in a position to know and that he could therefore pick a reason.
Post a Comment