Will CIA go the criminal sustainment route to replace the USAID funding? Or will the billionaires set up more hedge funds and private NGOs (ala Soros) to fund and coordinate their "Capacity Built" influence projects?
...as global governments fade into irrelevancy.
Technofeudalism UNLEASHED!
19 comments:
Mike Benz's mental illness fueled paranoid tinfoil hat delusions find a way...
I think he is worried that the maximum number of people possible might not perish.
maga is evil.
Is there any truth to anything this Turd says? I'm sure there is. But do I trust his spin on it? Absolutely not.
Enjoy your corporate cloud-serfdom, prole.
Seems you enjoy yours.
Once again Dervish's take is spot on.
MAGA is absolutely evil. As is its architect America's greatest ever con-"man" the FOTUS.
Sinner, take the beam from thine own eye (mathew 7:3-5)
Minus: Enjoy your corporate cloud-serfdom, prole.
Thanks to donald trump.
...only the last in a long line of Cloudalism's political advocates. After all... who built Jack's Magic Coffee Shop?
The Bible, at best, is a highly edited book (twice) of questionable stories edited to condition society to accept absolute Roman authority in the name of god.
You do the bible. I'll do reality.
...a Reality Laced and Tainted by Critical Race Theory (CRT) and other ridiculous guilt-pride ideologies.
The Conservative Treehouse invented that BS.
"If my hunch is correct, Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy".
Copilot...
You're absolutely right to question whether Elon Musk has actually exposed the alleged government-tech infrastructure entanglement behind social media platforms, as The Conservative Treehouse predicted in 2022.
🧩 What Was Predicted:
> “Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy.”
This implied:
- A near-future revelation of deep government involvement in social media.
- Possibly through classified tech, funding pipelines, or surveillance partnerships.
🕵️♂️ What Has Actually Happened (as of mid-2025):
- Musk has criticized government spending and called for cutting subsidies—even those benefiting his own companies43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054.
- He’s engaged in public feuds with President Trump, who has threatened to revoke Musk’s government contracts and subsidies43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054.
- Musk has not produced concrete evidence or a formal exposé revealing that social media platforms (including X/Twitter) run on U.S. government infrastructure or receive covert subsidies.
🧠 So What Gives?
The phrase “poised to expose” was speculative and never guaranteed action. Musk may have:
- Lacked access to the kind of classified or technical proof needed.
- Chosen not to reveal such information for strategic, legal, or political reasons.
- Shifted focus to other battles—like fiscal policy, censorship debates, or launching his “America Party.”
🧭 Bottom Line:
No, you didn’t miss anything. Musk has not exposed the alleged infrastructure or subsidy pipeline. The “poised” prediction remains unfulfilled, at least in the way it was framed.
Musk? What does Jack's Magic Coffee Shop got to do with Musk?
Sure, throw a false premise in to disprove another premise.
Speaking of Musk though, who do you think is paying for StarShield?
Hint - Yeah, the owners of Jack's.
Minus: Musk? What does Jack's Magic Coffee Shop got to do with Musk?
WTF??! You can NOT gaslight me on this. I cited the article. YOU cited the article back when it was first published. Musk was going to expose that it is a "well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy".
He has not. Because the theory that social media platforms receive/received government funding is BS.
This premise absolutely is false, but Conservative Treehouse is the entity that proposed it, not me.
Minus: ...ridiculous guilt-pride ideologies...
These "ideologies" are completely ridiculous. I agree. And the right is ridiculous for imagining them. Well, ridiculous lies obviously are working for you. Currently.
Reality is going to hit hard for a lot of trump supporters when the Bigly Billionaire Beneficial legislation goes into effect.
...like no tax on Social Security. That's gonna HURT!
The Cloud isn't a subsidy?
What about the interstate highway system? You think the government should not have built that?
The claim was that Elon was going to expose a "well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy".
What you refer to isn't a secret. And the sentence is "AND indirect subsidy". You're combing the two (ignoring the AND) and asserting something that isn't a secret needed "exposing".
When did Elon "expose" this non secret? And why would he have needed to buy Twitter to "expose" it, when it's not a secret?
Post a Comment