Harford County - It took 46 Minutes to Deliberate His Guilt.
I was almost part of that jury... but my juror number enabled me to skip jury duty that day. :)
Note to HC Authorities: If you ever bring back the death penalty, I'd be more than happy to pull the switch.
23 comments:
Minus: If you ever bring back the death penalty, I'd be more than happy to pull the switch.
Seems like the kind of thing you'd find fun. Regardless of whether he was guilty or not. Not that this person wasn't, but I get the impression that you'd like killing someone regardless of guilt or innocence. Perhaps if it was a hated "illegal" or a imagined member of "Trantifa". We already know you cheer the extrajudicial killing of suspects that "resist". Unless they are attacking the Capitol.
His guilt is all that matters.
"Guilt" soon to be solely determined by Turd-2, bypassing the judiciary! Not just for "illegal immigrants", but also American citizens. A fascist development you surely support. As an admitted fascist :(
lol! floated the idea...
Floating preceding implementing.
Dervish loves freeing violent criminals, letting them get away with killing people.
I am very strongly opposed to freeing violent criminals and letting them get away with killing people. I'm strongly opposed to King d0n0ld deciding by himself who the "violent criminals" are. Because he lies. As proven in the case of Kilmar Ábrego García. He was fleeing from MS-13, not a member of it.
YOU are in favor of freeing violent criminals and pardoning them for their attempts to overthrow democracy, Mystere.
DHS outted Kilmar. He was MS-13 after all.
BS. If that was the case, then why would they not have agreed to show the evidence to the judge. I've heard that up to 90 percent of the people the sent to El Salvador prisons had no gang affiliations. In addition to being unconstitutional, what Turd-2 has done to these men is pure evil. Why you're so approving of it.
I'm approving of it because he violated UN asylum seeking procedures by not seeking asylum in Mexico OR the US. Why didn't Kilroy seek asylum in 2012 when he illegally crossed the border? Because he's a human trafficker for MS-13.
Turd-2 didn't follow proper procedure in deporting him. That's as per a 9-0 Supreme Court decision. We are in a Constitutional crisis RIGHT NOW. Turd-2 is in defiance of a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling.
In 3 days the Constitutional Crisis will be over, especially in the "borderlands". LOL!
If King d0n0ld invokes The Insurrection Act of 1807, "the Constitutional Crisis will be over", because that will be the day Emperor d0n0ld seizes power as a dictator and the Constitution is overthrown. A positive development in your view, no doubt. I'm sure many Americans will disagree.
Unlike the Judiciary, he'll serve the American people. I can live with that. We'll have in substance that which we only have in "form" today.
He won't. Proven by the fact that he isn't currently. He's doing the opposite.
The People aren't all Democrats, Derv. Get over yourselves.
Illegals aren't "the people" either.
American power is limited in range, not absolute.
King d0n0ld is harming his own supporters.
Like his polices re coivd during his first administration KILLED his own supporters.
Though a president is SUPPOSED to be acting on behalf of ALL the people.
FYI, republicans that worked for the government got fired. And there are old republicans who need help in regards to their social security benefits.
Mad king d0n0ld's policies are destroying American owned small businesses. Not Democrat-owned small businesses exclusively.
You think that republicans who built up small businesses via decades of hard work are loving that d0n0ld tRump is ruining their life's work?
Copilot: The Insurrection Act of 1807 does grant a president the authority to deploy military forces domestically under specific circumstances, such as suppressing rebellion or enforcing laws. However, invoking the act does not mean the president can bypass the judiciary or act without legal constraints. The judiciary remains a critical check on executive power, even during extraordinary measures like invoking the Insurrection Act.
The blog comment reflects a belief that such an invocation would lead to sweeping changes, but this interpretation oversimplifies the legal and constitutional framework. The act is not a tool for overriding the Constitution or dismantling checks and balances -- it’s meant to address specific crises while still operating within the bounds of the law. [end]
CoPilot isn't aware that Trump declared a border emergency? Figures, just leave out current info and turn crank...
lol!
The 1861 Maryland legislature/ Lincoln suspension of habeas corpus is a case in point (Ex Parte Merryman).
How'd that work out for Taney?
Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the Government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated? Even in such a case, would not the official oath be broken if the Government should be overthrown when it was believed that disregarding the single law would tend to preserve it?”
The President also confronted Taney’s opinion that only Congress could suspend the writ.
“Now it is insisted that Congress, and not the Executive, is vested with this power; but the Constitution itself is silent as to which or who is to exercise the power; and as the provision was plainly made for a dangerous emergency, it can not be believed the framers of the instrument intended that in every case the danger should run its course until Congress could be called together, the very assembling of which might be prevented, as was intended in this case, by the rebellion,” Lincoln argued.
After the Merryman incident, Lincoln suspended the writ in other situations, and he received approval from Congress in March 1863 to suspend the writ for the duration of the conflict when “the public safety may require it.”
He cited the relevant clause in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution: "nor shall the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it....
...While Lincoln ignored Taney's opinion and continued to suspend habeas corpus, Congress later retroactively approved his action.
---
The saying "It's better to ask for forgiveness than permission" generally means that it is more effective to take action and then seek approval or apologize later, rather than seeking permission beforehand. This approach can be more efficient in certain situations where speed or flexibility are prioritized.
Post a Comment