"Accountability is coming" = BS. Accountability is here now. Proven by the first video you posted.
Rasmussen continues to lie about being independent.
"That's just our lot in life"... for being biased and spreading misinformation. What a surprise. Not. What a Turd.
Rasmussen = republiturd shills and bigly Turds. Not "nonpartisan" as they laughably claim. I'd heard they were biased. This video (and the last one you posted) confirms they are bigly biased. Much more so than I knew previously).
"Vote dump" = counting votes.
Copilot: ...the term "vote dump" is often used to imply something suspicious or illegal, but in reality, it usually refers to the normal process of counting and reporting votes. During elections, especially with a high volume of mail-in ballots, results can come in batches, leading to significant updates at once. This is a standard part of the vote-counting process and doesn't indicate any wrongdoing.
Elections are already rigged to favor republicans. "Accountability" is rigging more so republicans can never lose. You want results like when Putin is overwhelmingly "reelected".
As per the BBC the tally so far (with 99 percent of the votes counted) is 49.9 to 48.3. That is a 1.6 percent difference. The BBC concludes "Trump cannot say that he won the outright majority of the presidential votes that were cast in the election overall. To do so, he would need to have won more than 50%, as all victors have done for the last 20 years -- other than Trump in 2016".
NOT a "mandate". It was a squeaker. And I would not be surprised to find out there was outright cheating. We already know he cheated by bombarding the populace with propaganda and lies. That's why Elon paid 44 billion for Twitter and DOES NOT CARE that it's currently worth only 15 Billion. People make a big deal out of Kamala's 1 billion, but that PALES in comparison to what Elon lost in Twitter value. But it will be totally worth it to him re the money he's going to rake in with d0n0ld as predisent.
Descovy, Wegovy, Biktarvy, Dovato, Apretude and Cavenuva don't exist, Dervish? They seem to be interacting with those fatso pills you're taking, such as Ozempic and Jardiance. Maybe that explains why you got upset when I let you know that someone sent me that secret recording of the side effects you got. You certainly let them rip, as if you were in Bidet's 0ffal 0ffice, sitting on the porcelain white seat.
They exist, Mystere. But they aren't called "queer pills". In any case, I don't take any of those medications. Not the ones you call "queer pills" or the ones you call "fatso pills". You probably know all about them because your doctor prescribed one from each category for you. Due to being gay and promiscuous. And also a fatso. btw, if you and your husband were monogamous you wouldn't need any "queer pills".
btw, it's "Yousa Fraud" (delusions), not "Mesa Fraud". I doubt Jar Jar Binks would identify as republican.
btw...
Me: The blog author portrayed the fraud committed in Mesa County as an intent to help Democrats and Kamala Harris. But you say that was not disclosed?
Copilot: Correct. The reports on the Mesa County voter fraud scheme do not specify which candidates or issues the fraudulent ballots were intended to support.
Minus: You don't care if Republicans cheat? Good to know...
My comment says the opposite. You obviously have reading comprehension problems. Actually, what's probably happening is that you see (and believe) what you want. As always.
"I pursue my own jouissance" = believing lies that are pleasing to you.
Me: If someone chooses to believe lies because they are preferable to the person, would you call that immoral or potentially immoral?
Copilot: Believing lies because they are more comfortable or preferable can be considered ethically questionable, especially if it involves willful ignorance. Here's why...
Personal Integrity: Deliberately choosing to believe something known to be false can undermine a person's integrity. It can lead to self-deception and a disconnection from reality, which is not conducive to personal growth or ethical behavior.
Impact on Others: If these beliefs influence others or lead to spreading misinformation, the ethical implications become more severe. It can harm relationships, create divisions, and perpetuate falsehoods, which can have wider societal consequences.
Accountability: An important aspect of morality involves being accountable for one's actions and beliefs. Choosing comfort over truth can sidestep this responsibility and contribute to a culture where facts are less valued.
In short, it can be seen as potentially immoral because it avoids the responsibility of seeking and upholding the truth, which is a cornerstone of ethical behavior. [end copilot response].
In short, the answer is YES, you are acting immorally.
16 comments:
d0n0ld isn't predisent.
"Accountability is coming" = BS. Accountability is here now. Proven by the first video you posted.
Rasmussen continues to lie about being independent.
"That's just our lot in life"... for being biased and spreading misinformation. What a surprise. Not. What a Turd.
Rasmussen = republiturd shills and bigly Turds. Not "nonpartisan" as they laughably claim. I'd heard they were biased. This video (and the last one you posted) confirms they are bigly biased. Much more so than I knew previously).
"Vote dump" = counting votes.
Copilot: ...the term "vote dump" is often used to imply something suspicious or illegal, but in reality, it usually refers to the normal process of counting and reporting votes. During elections, especially with a high volume of mail-in ballots, results can come in batches, leading to significant updates at once. This is a standard part of the vote-counting process and doesn't indicate any wrongdoing.
Elections are already rigged to favor republicans. "Accountability" is rigging more so republicans can never lose. You want results like when Putin is overwhelmingly "reelected".
Rassmussen nailed the polls throughout. We finally have a polling organization that tells the truth.
No. d0n0ld's margin of victory was tiny.
As per the BBC the tally so far (with 99 percent of the votes counted) is 49.9 to 48.3. That is a 1.6 percent difference. The BBC concludes "Trump cannot say that he won the outright majority of the presidential votes that were cast in the election overall. To do so, he would need to have won more than 50%, as all victors have done for the last 20 years -- other than Trump in 2016".
NOT a "mandate". It was a squeaker. And I would not be surprised to find out there was outright cheating. We already know he cheated by bombarding the populace with propaganda and lies. That's why Elon paid 44 billion for Twitter and DOES NOT CARE that it's currently worth only 15 Billion. People make a big deal out of Kamala's 1 billion, but that PALES in comparison to what Elon lost in Twitter value. But it will be totally worth it to him re the money he's going to rake in with d0n0ld as predisent.
Counting California's fake votes doesn't change the 0utcome. Trump has a resounding mandate amongst amongst actual (and not fake) voters.
d0n0ld does NOT have a mandate. Except maybe with Elon. I hear their bromance is strong and Elon will be the new first lady.
Your queer pills sure have some nasty side effects on you, Dervish.
I don't know what "queer pills" are. They must be pills that exist in Mystere's delusions.
Descovy, Wegovy, Biktarvy, Dovato, Apretude and Cavenuva don't exist, Dervish? They seem to be interacting with those fatso pills you're taking, such as Ozempic and Jardiance. Maybe that explains why you got upset when I let you know that someone sent me that secret recording of the side effects you got. You certainly let them rip, as if you were in Bidet's 0ffal 0ffice, sitting on the porcelain white seat.
They exist, Mystere. But they aren't called "queer pills". In any case, I don't take any of those medications. Not the ones you call "queer pills" or the ones you call "fatso pills". You probably know all about them because your doctor prescribed one from each category for you. Due to being gay and promiscuous. And also a fatso. btw, if you and your husband were monogamous you wouldn't need any "queer pills".
Nobody sent you a "secret recording" of me.
btw, it's "Yousa Fraud" (delusions), not "Mesa Fraud". I doubt Jar Jar Binks would identify as republican.
btw...
Me: The blog author portrayed the fraud committed in Mesa County as an intent to help Democrats and Kamala Harris. But you say that was not disclosed?
Copilot: Correct. The reports on the Mesa County voter fraud scheme do not specify which candidates or issues the fraudulent ballots were intended to support.
I am glad they caught the two Mesa County cheating republicans.
You don't care if Republicans cheat? Good to know...
Minus: You don't care if Republicans cheat? Good to know...
My comment says the opposite. You obviously have reading comprehension problems. Actually, what's probably happening is that you see (and believe) what you want. As always.
I pursue my own jouissance? How immoral of me.
"I pursue my own jouissance" = believing lies that are pleasing to you.
Me: If someone chooses to believe lies because they are preferable to the person, would you call that immoral or potentially immoral?
Copilot: Believing lies because they are more comfortable or preferable can be considered ethically questionable, especially if it involves willful ignorance. Here's why...
Personal Integrity: Deliberately choosing to believe something known to be false can undermine a person's integrity. It can lead to self-deception and a disconnection from reality, which is not conducive to personal growth or ethical behavior.
Impact on Others: If these beliefs influence others or lead to spreading misinformation, the ethical implications become more severe. It can harm relationships, create divisions, and perpetuate falsehoods, which can have wider societal consequences.
Accountability: An important aspect of morality involves being accountable for one's actions and beliefs. Choosing comfort over truth can sidestep this responsibility and contribute to a culture where facts are less valued.
In short, it can be seen as potentially immoral because it avoids the responsibility of seeking and upholding the truth, which is a cornerstone of ethical behavior. [end copilot response].
In short, the answer is YES, you are acting immorally.
Post a Comment