How the DNC Took Over the US Government and Established a Deep State
Sundance, "
The FBI Maintains a Workspace, Including a Secure Computer Portal, In side the Law Firm of Perkins Coie, the Ramifications are Significant"
There is very little that surprises me, but this is completely stunning. An FBI whistleblower came forth to inform Rep Jim Jordan and Rep Matt Gaetz that the FBI maintains a workspace inside the law firm of Perkins Coie. {Direct Rumble Link}
In response to a letter sent by Rep. Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, Perkins Coie, the legal arm of the DNC and Hillary Clinton, admitted they have been operating an FBI workspace in their Washington D.C. office since 2012. Pay attention to that date, it matters.
This is a huge development. Essentially, what is being admitted in this claim is that a portal existed into FBI databases within the law firm that represents democrats. This means access to FBI database searches exists inside the office of the DNC and Clinton legal group. Think about the ramifications here.
CTH has long claimed there was some kind of direct portal link between the Clinton campaign team and the FBI databases. There were too many trails of extracted non-minimized research evidence in the hands of the Clinton team that CTH could not trace to a transferring FBI official. If Perkins Coie operated a portal in their office that allowed them to conduct search queries of American citizens, then everything would make sense. That access portal is exactly what is being claimed and admitted in this report.
The start date of 2012 is important for several reasons, not the least of which is FISA presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer criticizing the scale and scope of unlawful FBI database access going back to exactly 2012. Keep in mind a FISA-702 search, is simply an unlawful FBI warrantless electronic search of an American (“702” represents the American citizen) into the central database -maintained by the NSA- that contains all electronic data and communication.
I have been in the deep hole of the FISA-702 database search query violations for so long I don’t even need a flashlight.
The report from Matt Gaetz about Perkins Coie access to FBI databases, is in direct alignment with Rosemary Collyer’s prior report on FBI abuses of the database, 702 violations. Notice the dates and scope Judge Collyer references.
on-compliant queries since 2012.
85% of the FBI and contractor searches are unlawful.
Many of those searches involved the use of the “same identifiers over different data ranges.” Put in plain terms, the same people were continually being tracked, searched and surveilled by querying the FBI database over time.
The non-compliant searches go back to 2012. The same date mentioned for the FBI portal to begin operating inside the Perkins Coie office.
This specific footnote is a key. Note the phrase: “([redacted] access to FBI systems was the subject of an interagency memorandum of understanding entered into [redacted])”, this sentence has the potential to expose an internal decision; withheld from congress and the FISA court by the Obama administration; that outlines a process for access and distribution of surveillance data.
Note: “no notice of this practice was given to the FISC until 2016“, that is important.
♦Summary: The FISA court identified and quantified tens-of-thousands of search queries of the NSA/FBI database using the FISA-702(16)(17) system. The database was repeatedly used by persons with contractor access who unlawfully searched and extracted the raw results without redacting the information and shared it with an unknown number of entities.
The outlined process certainly points toward a political spying and surveillance operation. When the DOJ use of the IRS for political information on their opposition became problematic, the Obama administration needed another tool. It was in 2012 when they switched to using the FBI databases for targeted search queries.
This information from Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz has the potential to be extremely explosive.
It will be interesting to see how the domestic intelligence community media (NYT, Politico, WaPo – in that order) respond to this Matt Gaetz report.
I wrote about these suspicions in depth throughout 2017, 2018 and eventually summarized in 2019:
SEE HERE.
30 comments:
Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz are liars. My default is to disbelieve anything either one of these lying scumbags says.
Well, I don't really have a "default" view of extreme far-left America haters like Donald Trump and his supporters, I mean, I do support their right to make fools of themselves on TV.
Left-of-center networks like NBC put Trump on America's televisions every week for 14 years in a row, creating a virtual lock on the 85 IQ and below demographic, which is right around 74 million people to get people behind the idea that America should be run like a perpetually bankrupt business leveraged by foreign debt. The fraud perpetrated on America by leftists like Trump can not be understated.
So when Matt Gaetz takes time away from wrapping his cars around trees and teaching teenaged girls how to snort cocaine off of his abdomen to tell us how fucked we truly are, we need to listen. The sooner we get all Trumpistas out of government, the better.
...America by leftists like Trump.
Mary Trump is a Leftist, but she has perpetrated no fraud.
donald tRump (her uncle) is a rightturd extremist. You would have to be pretty stupid to think donald tRump is a Leftist. Leftists don't support cutting taxes on the wealthy. Leftists support government spending for social welfare programs paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy. donald tRump running up the debt does not make him Leftist. Leftists are fiscally responsible.
Leftists are fiscally responsible.
Absurd. If leftists were fiscally responsible they wouldn't need other people's money.
Trump's maniacal interventions in the economy and opposition to free trade and private property (tariffs, Covid stimulus stupidity, banning landlords from collecting rent, etc.) made him the most left-wing president America has had since the progressives Woodrow "subsidize the KKK" Wilson and Frankly Demented Roosevelt.
Absurd. A Libertarian-run government that didn't use "other people's money" wouldn't exist. Government functions require funding. Even if the government functions are extremely limited, government cannot exist with zero funding.
Why did the Constitution propose to fund it through tariffs then?
Tariffs aren't other people's money? Who knew? Does tariff money magically appear out of thin air? Do local governments also have the ability to create magic tariff money from thin air?
It's pointless to argue with a critic of libertarianism that doesn't bother to learn what libertarianism is. The "night watchman state" of Victorian England, a real world example of minarchist principles, built an empire around the world. Hardly a case of non-existence. It housed and employed poor people that didn't want to starve to death or turn to prostitution or crime too. Quite an incentive for self-improvement without diverting tax revenue towards sustaining lazy pieces of shit.
You're just going to have to try harder, Derpy.
Why did the Constitution propose to fund it through tariffs then?
Different world then. The US government wasn't saddled with funding much more than post offices then. And even then Adam Smith's argument against the stupidity of tariffs applied.
Lysander Spooner created a cheaper, more efficient private postal service and shipping company and it pissed off the "powers that be."
Neither republicans nor Democrats support your libertarian plan to defund the police, Beamishderp. No doubt your plan would lead to a sharp increase in crime. Given that a significant pay cut would surely cause police officer morale to plummet. Low morale = poor job performance.
Although I fully support your right to smoke meth provided you can pay for any medical care issues resulting from it out of your own pocket, I do request that you don't post about subjects that you are ignorant of while exacerbating yourself on meth.
There is no "libertarian plan" to "defund the police." The activism behind calls to defund the police originates with progressive leftists and extreme pacifist religious groups (like the Quakers) and almost exclusively calls for moving funding for police to social services instead, which would be an even more egregious use of the money stolen from citizens via taxation.
I'd love to talk to you about libertarianism, Derpy, but until you've made some effort at educating yourself on the basics of it, I'm afraid your 58 IQ will continue to not impress me.
the American cities that defunded the police
All of them overwhelmingly deep blue Democrat politician led, none of them bastions of libertarianism, and not coincidentally nor surprisingly all hotbeds of illiteracy.
Stupid is as stupid does, Derpy.
from Wiki: Tariffs have historically served a key role in the trade policy of the United States. Their purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government and to allow for import substitution industrialization (industrialization of a nation by replacing foreign imports with domestic production) by acting as a protective barrier around infant industries.[1] They also aimed to reduce the trade deficit and the pressure of foreign competition. Tariffs were one of the pillars of the American System that allowed the rapid development and industrialization of the United States. The United States pursued a protectionist policy from the beginning of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. Between 1861 and 1933, they had one of the highest average tariff rates on manufactured imports in the world. However American agricultural and industrial were cheaper than rival products and the tariff had an impact primarily on wool products. After 1942 the U.S. promoted worldwide free trade.
There is no "libertarian plan" to "defund the police".
You articulated the plan in the comment I was responding to. Apparently you believe trained police officers should be fired (all of them) and replaced with untrained homeless people.
Quote: The "night watchman state" of Victorian England ... housed and employed poor people that didn't want to starve to death or turn to prostitution or crime too.
It is probably just you who thinks this is a good idea (and therefore it isn't a "libertarian plan"). Liberturdians do want to drastically reduce the size of government, but I don't think slashing police budgets is a part of that. They're probably be in favor of greatly increasing the size of police budgets, given that Liberturdians want to increase the suffering of the masses by removing the social safety net, while at the same time allowing workers to be paid slave wages (by eliminating the minimum wage). Poor people turn to crime when they can't get ahead (or even sustain their lives) any other way.
My IQ is significantly higher than 58. Why I know smoking meth is a bad idea and why I never have used any illegal drug. And never will.
Study: Nobody defunded the police. 4/18/2022. (excerpt) The call to "defund" was less of a unified call for abolition, and more of a general sentiment that directing nearly a third of taxpayer money to the police seemed inconsistent with the regular high-profile incidents of police violence. ... there was little if any "defunding" of the police. Our analysis of over 400 American municipal budgets found that police departments in America got more or less the same amount of money in 2021 than they did in the previous three years. The budget cuts that did pass in a handful of cities were modest compared to the size of the total budget.
I really don't see how we can have an honest, respectful discussion as long as you're going to contest indisputable things, like the fact that you're a fucking moron.
Government funded police forces in England were introduced for the first time in the Victorian period of England.
I already anticipated you were dumber than oatmeal when you claimed to be a leftist, but God damn. Read a book sometime, Poindexter.
Yeah... "Untrained homeless people" investigated the Jack the Ripper serial killings. Scotland Yard was a libertarian homeless shelter.
You really and truly are the dumbest motherfucker on the internet when Trump's not online.
I sometimes wonder why conservatives aren't eager to engage in serious discourse with Leftists on subjects like race and/or gun control...
NAAAAAAH!
Re "stupid is as stupid does"... I'm dumb while Beamishderp is smart, yet he authors countless super-bigoted comments. Proof the following is true...
...higher self-assessed intelligence was associated with higher levels of racism. The explanation for this finding is that people who estimate their cognitive ability to be higher than others tend to perceive the social world vertically in terms of superiority and inferiority. Such people are high in "social dominance orientation", an anti-egalitarian ideology linked to prejudice.
Similar findings have been found in studies of narcissism. Narcissistic people believe they are superior, have inflated estimates of their intelligence, and they also tend to hold more prejudiced attitudes. (Source: The strange links between intelligence and prejudice).
No, I just point out that you're an idiot, and you proceed to leave no doubt I'm correct.
Do you really think you're helping yourself here? FJ knows what libertarians believe, and could map the ideological course that became modern libertarianism back to Lao Tzu if not the book of 1st Samuel in the Bible. I can hang in that conversation. You don't even have a clue.
Even the drunk freeloader Karl Marx enjoyed living in libertarian Victorian England, where he was at far less risk of being arrested for the stupid shit he was writing and ranting.
I sometimes wonder why conservatives aren't eager to engage in serious discourse with Leftists on subjects like race and/or gun control...
Put me in, coach!
The last time someone put a noose around the neck of a black man in America, it was a black man running for the US Senate in Kentucky and he put the noose there himself. Black on black crime is sad. Threatening to kill oneself if not elected is just pathetic.
Rand Paul should run ads asking the friends and family of Charles Booker to set up an intervention and put him on a suicide watch. This is very concerning, even if we can't see Booker jerking off. Autoerotic asphyxiation took out David Carradine and Michael Hutchins. It's no laughing matter.
LOL! Sounds like his Freudian slip was showing.
Do you really think you're helping yourself here?
Helping myself in regards to what? Improving your opinion of my level of intelligence? Apparently your delusions are telling you that I give a crap what you think about how smart (or dumb) I may be. I don't care.
That's the problem. You don't care to even have the dignity to be interesting. You enjoy being wrong. You've exhausted your anti-libertarian arsenal and haven't even hit your target.
Dervy thinks he can shame the shameless for having committed sins that we see as virtues.
What a maroon....
I am aware that you are shameless and view your racism and bigotry as virtues. That isn't going to stop me from speaking the truth. I don't "enjoy being wrong". What a moronic comment. Beamish enjoys being wrong. He delights in authoring highly offensive and bigoted comments.
Also highly absurd comments like those he writes about nuking Russia. Orders that would likely be disobeyed as unlawful. And result in the president issuing them being removed via the 25th amendment. Beamish's problem is that he thinks being offensive and absurd are entertaining. With Minus it works (gets praise for it). Which feeds his delusions. But they ARE delusions.
I've never written an offensive and bigoted comment in my life, you retarded octoroon.
Bullplop. You are the most I intentionally offensive and bigoted a-hole I have ever encountered. And I would bet a least any 8 out of 10 people who read your comments would agree.
I'd give it a whirl if being offended was lethal.
Post a Comment