Turd-2 is trying to choke off Democrat's funding sources. It's another of their attempts to cheat to retain power permanently. The same as with their false allegations against The SPLC.
Meanwhile the corrupt scotus recently ruled that corporations and oligarchs can give unlimited funds to republican campaigns. They couldn't be more transparent. They're trying to make legit funding sources for Democrats illegal while making their own corrupt funding sources legal.
lol! Kamala Harris's presidential campaign significantly outspent Donald Trump's campaign during the 2024 election cycle, with Harris spending over $1 billion compared to Trump's roughly $470 million to $650 million depending on the tracked committee metrics.
The party that claims to stand for tolerance keeps finding common cause with people who despise every value it claims to hold, from theocrats abroad to street-level agitators who excuse political violence at home. You don’t have to believe in a grand conspiracy to notice the pattern. Coalitions are built on votes, not principles, and this one has been assembled from groups that agree on almost nothing except who they want out of power. The “So Called Leaders” in the American, Socialist, Progressive, Communist Democratic Party Hakeem Jeffries, and Chuck Schumer have introduced legislation to add justices to the Supreme Court,(Pad the Court) and the party’s most prominent voices, Hakeem Jeffries and Kamala Harris both of them have said everything is on the table if they retake Congress. Call it reform if you want. Adding more, and more seats until you get the rulings you want is still adding seats until you get the rulings you want. The same logic applies to admitting the District of Columbia and pushing Puerto Rico toward Statehood. The House has already passed D.C. statehood twice. Two new States mean 4 new Senators, and nobody pretends both parties would benefit equally. Also States run by Democratic legislatures have made gender transition treatments available to minors with minimal parental involvement, treatments a child cannot meaningfully consent to and can’t undo. All that plus the fact that Senator Bernie Sanders’s “MEDICARE FOR ALL BILL “would make it illegal for private and employer health plans to exist. Traditional Medicare, the program that more than 64 million Americans currently rely on, is being folded into a new government system, along with Medicaid and the ACA exchanges. Medicare Advantage, which 55 percent of eligible seniors have chosen, disappears too. A 2024 analysis by the Center for Health and Economy put the price tag for Kamala Harris’s version at nearly $44 trillion in added federal spending over 10 years. This isn’t a public option next to what you have now. It’s a replacement for it, whether you asked for one or not. That ’is NOT consent of the Governed. That’s a rule change all dressed up as Reform. It’s ALL on the bill plain for the eye to see, the platform language, the floor speeches., all of it! The American, Socialist, Progressive, Communist Democratic Party isn’t hiding the plan. It’s right there just daring you to read it.
Les Carpenter Said: We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stupidity.
As expected Dave Dubya once again deflects. If socialism is so great why aren't Americans moving to CUBA? Because, and all please note, Cuba is a failure. Socialism is a failure, it must have the rich to fund their failed policy's. Without capitalism, without other people's money, socialism fails. Can you give us an example where this is not true? So Dave and your gang, when are you moving to Cuba or Canada? Living the dream? When?
As I was reading this blog I noticed that a few people has made remarks about Shaw’s Crap House Blog reminding me that I had made several attempts to post there Defending the unfair posts about our President Donald Trump but my comments failed to ever see the light of being published.
LOL! That has nothing to do with what I wrote. Also, entities other than campaigns spent money on the election. el0n musk basically bought twitter to spread disinformation in support of trump, for example.
To clarify: You referred to funding (for the campaign of Kamala Harris) that happened BEFORE trump became president a second time. Turd-2 didn't exist at the time, so how can what you wrote have ANYTHING to do with your post? When your post is about things that are happening now that Turd-2 does exist?
What exactly is this "Trump corruption"? :dunno: For a freaking DECADE the demented LEFT have been clamoring about whatever it is, but all they've come up with they had to fabricate. All made up bullshit. Russia Russia Russia. Fake real-estate corruption changes in NY and FLA. "Classified documents". On and on. All FAKE. Poor Chuckie, Schumer He's going to be Ousted by a Female Communist MORON, but he's more concerned about Emmanuel Orangestein. Pathetic
The Supreme Court has allowed the construction on the White House Ballroom to continue. It’s not any violation of the Constitution in any way which does not address building rights and its another win for President Trump. Who Cares? Lets see now. Obama put in a basketball court, Ford put in a swimming pool those were personal use projects. The ballroom is actually functional for government use or I suppose you'd rather keep having state dinners or other affairs in a rented tent, or somewhere where another Lunatic Commie Democrat could shoot up the place!
So much of what those on the Lunatic Left says, and repeatsd over and over again , Is Not True, a Hoax, or Just Plain Fiction spread by the American Democratic, Socialist Progressive, Communist Dolts, who Lack Intelligence, Common Sense, idiots, Morons, and Meatheads. Have you not noticed how all the popular, and well-known :Fact Checking “Organizations” NEVER seem to go after the NYT, the WaPo, the BoGlob, the LAT, The New orker, The Nation, The Daily Kos, BuzzFeed, the FBU, the CIA, the DOJ, the State Department, the UN, et al.? Why? Because they are all one of the same! And have you noticed that the “Progressive Press Propagandists” don't hold the sway that they used to. They've screamed "Wolf" too many times and they have rung the Alarm s, and rang the Bells too often. And another thing Good people don't like being called Nazis, Hitler’s, or Fascists and millions of Good people will go to the polls just simply to vote against whoever is smearing them,
Make NO mistake about it 80% plus of Americans think the possibility of Iran's Nuclear program threatens the US and thats the main reason why they support President Trum. An 85 % of Americans and the Majority of voters support using military action to stop Tehran from obtaining Nuclear Weapons Most Americans oppose Iran war but want regime change, freedom for Iranians, no nuclear threat. June 22, 2026. A total of 83% said it was important for the US to permanently end the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, and 88% said it was important to stop Iran from posing a threat to other countries. Specifically, most Americans suspect Iran's nuclear program has not been permanently stopped, and that Iran will not stop threatening its neighbors.
Well, Veronica, perhaps you should consider how you present your post. Be respectful and bring receipts in support of your opinion and she'll probably post your commen. Probably respond as well, I'm guessing.
The Lying Creep Abdul El-Sayed is now distancing himself from Hasan Piker is all a show. By this, I bet right after the General Election they will be inseparable. This is all show by El-Sayed. Remember Virginia, how the now Governor said she would not support certain legislation and the day after she was sworn in she did just the opposite. SHE LIED, the same as ED-SAYED lies. By the way just in case you didn’t alters know it , Michigan, Abdul Ed-Sayed HATES YOU.
As if the Phony Michigan Democratic Socialist Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is struggling in the polls. His opponent, Republican Mike Rogers, is also trailing in every survey of Michigan’s voters in August except one, reliably drawing between 45 and 48 percent support. But those last few percentage points can make or break a candidacy, and Michigan Democrats have made it abundantly clear that the polls are covering up bigger problems for El-Sayed’s campaign.What Michigan Democrat Debbie Dingell called the “crisis” represented by the well known and Hated and strongly Dis-liked Hasan Piker’s participation in her state’s politics continued Saturday as El-Sayed persisted in his effort to distance himself from the scandalizing influencer,
Abdul El-Sayed’s Non-Apolog Your What’s that all about you may ask? It means now that going after President Trump didn’t work to much. h’e’ll Now go after Vice President Vance.
“I was horrified and heartbroken this afternoon to hear the reports of an active shooter at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield. I’m thankful that no worshippers, students, or teachers were harmed. We all owe a debt of gratitude to temple security and law enforcement, who acted swiftly to keep the community safe.
“To my Jewish sisters and brothers, you have a right to worship in peace. You have a right to send your kids to the synagogue in the morning and know they’ll come home safely at night. And you have a right to know that your religious identity and faith practice are respected.
“There is no room for antisemitism in America. So today and everyday, I am standing in solidarity with all of us who value our right to pray how we choose to pray against antisemitism and hate in all its forms.” There is NO PLACE IN THIS COUNTRY FOR AN IDIOT LIKE HIM.
LET CARPENTER; We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stup of
We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stupid.
Minus: Yes, we do prefer productive investment (Trump/Twitter) rather than non-productive investments (Harris celebrity endorsement model).
Right. To spread your propaganda. And now Turd-2 is approving rightturd billionaires gobbling up existing media. To further spread your propaganda. While also using the FCC to intimidate and suppress truth telling.
btw, I don't deny that the Harris team blew it. She could have spent her money more effectively to counter rightturd propaganda and win by less narrow margin (preventing it from being stolen, which it was).
The House Democrats, including Democratic leader of the house Hakeem Jeffries (of New York, Just Handed You Proof They Won’t Say No To Socialism! On last Tuesday night, the House of Representatives voted on something you’d think would be very easy to put into . Stand up for American core ideals, say socialism is bad, sit back down. Instead, 192 Democrats looked at that microphone and walked away. Only eight crossed over to join Republicans. Two couldn’t even commit to a yes or a no and voted present instead. The decision by our colleagues blind sided the entire House Let that just sink in for a minute! . This wasn’t a bill to cut a Program or Raise Taxes. It was a “Resolution,” a piece of paper with no legal teeth, asking members of Congress to say that Socialism has led to Famine, Repression, and the Deaths of over One Hundred Million People Worldwide, and that it Has No Place in this Country.
Here’s what happened! Here’s the result. Here’s the number that should worry every single single Democrat. And every strategist in Washington. The last time the House voted on a Resolution like this, was back in November od 1986, and the Democrats supported it. This time, only eight did. That’s not just a small shift. That’s a party that has been dragged, Primary by Primary, away from anything resembling the center and toward the single Democrat Socialists of America’s platform of abolishing the Senate as we know it! And opening the door to Noncitizen voting, and telling the voters flat out that America has never been a Democracy in the first place. The current Democratic leadership’s excuse was that the Resolution also backed the SAVE America Act’s citizenship and photo ID requirements for voting, and that this made it a Poison Pill. Nearly two hundred House Democrats would rather protect their own asses than say, on the record, that requiring proof you’re an American citizen to vote in an American election is a good idea! And that my friends is a damn shame! The result is that Two Hundred and Eighteen years after the Constitution set this country up to guard against exactly this kind of concentrated, unaccountable power, House Democrats couldn’t muster the votes to say Socialism is bad and citizens should decide American elections. Eighty-six of them could say it in November. Eight could say it now. Do the math on where that trend ends.
Right. More red scare fascist hysteria and hate. How about Trump's "charities" for his personal gain? And look at his pal in Florida. Ron and Casey DeSantis: These two crooks stole $10 million from a settlement with a charity, wired it to Casey’s fake “charity,” laundered it through two puppet organizations, and then used it for political ads in an election year. They should be in jail. Casey DeSantis’s “charity” is a complete sham. It never filed paperwork with the IRS. It has no minutes from meetings. No website. And no evidence of doing anything legal or legitimate.
The only reason DeSantis appointed Ashley Moody to Rubio’s senate seat is because she aided and abetted him in stealing $10 million dollars of Florida taxpayers funds for his wife’s charity.
The "One Rule" of the land is, "It's OK if you are a Republican".
JD Vance: There is this crazy idea in the Democratic Party that if you just repeat insane ideas, eventually the American people are going to believe them.
JD Vance: If I have to create stories so that the media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do.
JD Vance: “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the dogs”.
JD Vance: I’m trying to focus on doing as much of God’s work as possible right now. And if that leads to the end times, okay.”
JD Vance: "The professors are the enemy"
JD Vance “I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler. How's that for discouraging?”
Donald Trump is bringing PEACE to Iran by bombing it. The Iranian people are dancing in the streets and praising Trump's name for dropping bombs on them and threatening to wipe them out of existence. The relatives of dead Iranians are loving Trump for sending their relatives to the afterlife, bringing them ultimate peace.
The parents of the school children that got taken out by the U.S. Tomahawk missile are so happy their children are in paradise👼. When they heard their kids were dead they also started dancing in the streets, thanking Donald Trump and the US military for liberating their kids from their lives👼.
The same as Palestinians are loving Netanyahu, thanking him, and asking to be bombed and shot MORE. Donald Trump should win MULTIPLE peace prizes for how much he is helping Muslims in the Middle East🏆🏆🏆.
If the Muslim is an Iranian and hates their regime or a Gazan who hates Hamas, they are happy to die to take out the evildoers keeping them down. If not, then they are on the side of the Iranian regime or Hamas. And Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are doing them a bigly favor by sending them to Hell to collect their 72 virgins❤️🔥😁
""True intellectual honesty means the pursuit of truth comes before personal politics or beliefs. An intellectually honest person changes their view when presented with better evidence. An intellectually dishonest person twists or ignores the evidence to protect their original conclusion""
...destroying possibility of discussion -- it's not about honesty or dishonesty.
It's intellectual cowardness and seeking of power same time.
Intellectual cowardice is the refusal to engage with ideas, facts, or arguments that challenge your existing beliefs, comfort, or social standing.<<---- sounds familiar? ;-)
It is a psychological and philosophical defense mechanism where a person prioritizes emotional safety and conformity over truth and objective reality.<<--- this too
Unlike general cowardice, which involves a fear of physical danger, intellectual cowardice is rooted in the fear of being wrong, ostracized, or forced to change.
Key Traits of Intellectual CowardiceIntellectual cowardice manifests in several distinct behaviors, which can be grouped by how a person handles challenging information:
Avoidance of Discomfort Echo chambers: Surrounding oneself only with people and media that confirm existing biases.
Tone policing: Dismissing a valid argument purely because of how it was delivered, rather than addressing what was said.
willful ignorance: Intentionally choosing not to research or look at evidence that might disprove a cherished belief.
Defensive ThinkingStrawman arguments: Misrepresenting an opponent's complex view as something weak or ridiculous so it is easier to attack.
Ad hominem attacks: Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.
Compartmentalization: Holding two contradictory beliefs at the same time to avoid the mental strain of resolving them.
Social ConformityGroupthink: Agreeing with a community or political faction blindly out of fear of being cancelled or rejected.
Silence: Refusing to speak up for a known truth because it is unpopular or risky to do so.Intellectual
Cowardice vs. Intellectual HumilityTo better understand the concept, it helps to compare it to its opposite virtue:
FeatureIntellectual CowardiceIntellectual Humility / Courage Reaction to being wrongAnger, denial, or personal attacksCuriosity, acceptance, and adaptation Handling opposing viewsCensoring, mocking, or ignoring themListening, analyzing, and debating them Primary goalProtecting the ego and social statusFinding the objective truth View of certaintyBelieves they already know everythingAcknowledges the limits of their knowledgeWhy People Fall Into It Intellectual cowardice is rarely driven by a lack of intelligence. <<--- yeah, but -- first you are coward... and then you are dumb Fear -- making one dumb and dumber. Yaaawn
Instead, it is driven by human psychology.Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
Intellectual cowardice is the refusal to engage with ideas, facts, or arguments that challenge your existing beliefs, comfort, or social standing.<<---- sounds familiar? ;-)
It is a psychological and philosophical defense mechanism where a person prioritizes emotional safety and conformity over truth and objective reality.<<--- this too
Unlike general cowardice, which involves a fear of physical danger, intellectual cowardice is rooted in the fear of being wrong, ostracized, or forced to change.
Key Traits of Intellectual CowardiceIntellectual cowardice manifests in several distinct behaviors, which can be grouped by how a person handles challenging information:
Avoidance of Discomfort Echo chambers: Surrounding oneself only with people and media that confirm existing biases.
Tone policing: Dismissing a valid argument purely because of how it was delivered, rather than addressing what was said.
willful ignorance: Intentionally choosing not to research or look at evidence that might disprove a cherished belief.
Defensive ThinkingStrawman arguments: Misrepresenting an opponent's complex view as something weak or ridiculous so it is easier to attack.
Ad hominem attacks: Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.
Compartmentalization: Holding two contradictory beliefs at the same time to avoid the mental strain of resolving them.
Social ConformityGroupthink: Agreeing with a community or political faction blindly out of fear of being cancelled or rejected.
Silence: Refusing to speak up for a known truth because it is unpopular or risky to do so.Intellectual
Cowardice vs. Intellectual HumilityTo better understand the concept, it helps to compare it to its opposite virtue:
FeatureIntellectual CowardiceIntellectual Humility / Courage Reaction to being wrongAnger, denial, or personal attacksCuriosity, acceptance, and adaptation Handling opposing viewsCensoring, mocking, or ignoring themListening, analyzing, and debating them Primary goalProtecting the ego and social statusFinding the objective truth View of certaintyBelieves they already know everythingAcknowledges the limits of their knowledgeWhy People Fall Into It Intellectual cowardice is rarely driven by a lack of intelligence. <<--- yeah, but -- first you are coward... and then you are dumb Fear -- making one dumb and dumber. Yaaawn
Instead, it is driven by human psychology.Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
My Message to Deplorable Yankee: Don't allow that Jackass to call you a Nazi . He's most likely not even intelligent to know just what a "Nazi" is. But he doesn't even deserve to be answered. , so you were correct in not doing so.
It heinous lying propagandistic distortion of -- national-SOCIALISTS.
Hitler&Co was german version of commies...
But for socialists(closet commies) of USA it was unbearable to admit -- that they, while having Russian commies as allies, fight against german commies... both of which they helped to empower..
Veronica, "I welcome the hatred from racists and neo-Nazis" was directed at Anonymous who called me a shithead. That's the kind of hate to expect from neo-Nazis.
I addressed DY by name. "DY, what you are afraid of is having a two-sided conversation. This is why you need to project and call me an idiot."
Apparently you're also terrified of a two-sided conversation. You can't tolerate facts or criticism of your Leader. This is why you call me a Jackass. Another neo-Nazi trait, BTW. Feel free to call me a smartass, though. ;-)
How do you know DY is "anonymous", anyway? Are you psychic? Or deranged?
Anonymous, We see you have a weak grasp of history and political ideologies. Trump has you believing Democrats are commies and Black people were "eating the dogs in Springfield". Himmler smiles from Hell to see his racist proteges destroy American democracy.
You see, Nazis WERE were far Right fascists and racists, not communists. Nazis HATED communists, just like you hate Democrats. Nazis also HATED Democrats like FDR for helping Russia kill more Nazis than any other allied country.
Let me help you out. Trump is a LIAR. He LOST a fair election to Biden, and sent a violent mob of CRIMINALS to overturn it. READ and LEARN to develop critical thinking. You show us you have no grasp of it, and this is why you are terrified of a two-sided conversation with people like me. http://www.davedubya.com/2026/08/critical-thinking.html
If you are ONLY going call people names as you usually do and blame others for doing it then YOU ARE NOT WORTH AN ANSWER OR AS NY Furniture communication With
He does not. trump has ZERO claim on any Nobel prize. The Nobel committee is not located in the United States and has no obligation to give a prize to someone simply because they think they should get one. The Nobel Prize that donald trump does have belongs to María Corina Machado.
Gemini: The Norwegian Nobel Committee clarified that while the physical medal can change hands, the official title of a Nobel laureate cannot be transferred or revoked, meaning Trump did not become an official prize winner through the gesture.
Norwegian politicians and commentators openly criticized the exchange, calling the decision to hand the award to Donald Trump "absurd" and a disrespect to the legacy of the Peace Prize.🛑
No, like in the United States since 8/14/1935 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law.
Currently Social Security keeps over 21 million Americans out of poverty each year. Without it, research shows that the poverty rate for Americans aged 65 and older would jump from 8.7% to 43.6%.
Qtard thinks keeping elderly Americans out of poverty is akin to the atrocities of Mao and Pol Pot? How so, Qtard?
Minus: I don't censor other people's arguments. That is intellectually dishonest, IMO.
You just put forward your own intellectually dishonest arguments.
But you do support donald trump's attempts to silence the arguments of the Left, don't you? I don't recall any criticisms from you concerning his lawsuits against News Organizations whose reporting he doesn't like and FCC attempts to silence them.
A person cannot post a comment and never engage? That's proof positive a comment was made by a bot according to Qtard?
🤖Gemini: The comment from "Sea Major" is almost certainly not a bot, and the rigid claim that engaging with it "proves stupidity" is a deeply flawed, elitist take on internet behavior.
Why "Sea Major" is Highly Likely a Human.
The comment contains too many specific, contextually relevant quirks to be an automated script. It responds directly to the breaking news from August 31, 2026, where the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 to let the White House ballroom construction continue.
Hyper-Specific Historical Analogies: A generic political bot might say, "Trump wins again, Democrats lose". A human partisan pulls specific, historical grievances out of their memory—like Barack Obama’s basketball court or Gerald Ford’s swimming pool—to justify their current team's actions.
Human Stylistic Errors: The phrase "Who Cares? Lets see now." and the missing apostrophe in "Lets" reflect conversational, unpolished human typing.
High Emotional Realism: The escalations into dramatic rhetoric ("another Lunatic Commie Democrat could shoot up the place!") perfectly mirror standard, highly impassioned internet political commentary. It reads exactly like a standard comment from a highly opinionated, real-life partisan reader.🛑
🤖Gemini: This comment by "Beantown Arnie" is overwhelmingly likely to be a real human being, not a bot. The commenter criticizing engaging with a bot is mislabeling aggressive, highly partisan human behavior as a "bot" to shut down discussion and mock people.
Here is the breakdown of why this comment screams "human" and why the author's logic remains completely flawed.
Technical Clues that "Beantown Arnie" is Human.
A political spam script is written to be efficient, but this comment has too many chaotic, organic human footprints...
Regional Slang / Identity: The username "Beantown Arnie" references Boston ("Beantown"), and the list of media outlets includes the "BoGlob" (The Boston Globe). A generic political bot doesn't naturally tie a hyper-local newspaper nickname to a regional username like that. That is the behavior of a real person from New England venting their specific media frustrations.
The "And Another Thing" Rant Structure: The text reads like a stream-of-consciousness monologue. Bots usually have a single point or a structured script. Arnie jumps from media bias, to the CIA, to the phrase "And another thing," to voter psychology. This is how a passionate human types when they are riled up.
Highly Specific Typos and Formatting.
"repeatsd over and over again" (A typo caused by hitting 's' instead of 'e' on a standard QWERTY keyboard).
Bots can be programmed to include typos to look human, but they rarely combine them with hyper-local context (BoGlob) and complex sentence structures like this.🛑
What's the Nobel Committee's skin in the Peace game? Does Sweden get blown up if they award the prize to the wrong person? Didn't think so. No skin-in-the-game.
Social Security is Socialism? So why did 8% of MY income, and 8% of my employer's income go to pay into its "trust" fund? I paid for my Social Security. I OVER-paid for it. A for sh*t mutual fund saved me more $ than Social Security did.
Minus: Not that he isn't 1,000x better than every Democrat sans Fetterman.
Fetterman is terrible. What a disappointment he turned out to be. The Democrats need to get rid of him ASAP.
As I recall, you were quite adamant that he could not serve in Congress after having a stroke. But now that he revealed himself to be a turncoat, you're fine with him and think he's great. Proof that the stroke was never your problem. You just used that as an excuse to bash him.
Qtard: Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
Your admission, yes? Well, one made without realizing it.
MAGAts can't handle the truth. -FJ, You LIE like a racist fascist. National Socialists HATED actual socialists. They were white nationalists and racists, like your MAGA party of criminals. They loved secret police and concentration camps. Like you.
So why would the poverty rate for Americans aged 65 and older jump from 8.7% to 43.6% if having to pay into social security is such a bad deal and they could have made more investing themselves? Social Security absolutely is socialism.
Except, in many cases the sued party simply folds. Because they figure that Turd-2 will target them and cause them problems if they don't.
The lawsuits are not about "calling out lies", they are about leveraging the power of the presidency for personal gain and to force compliance via intimidation.
Any American that Compares Our President or Vice President to “Hitler” is NOT an American in my eyes. If it’s ok with you then you are as stupid and as Guilty as they are. As for me, I can see that I dy belong here , so Good Bye.
Yikes! The MAGA crazies are out in full force. Knowing that their cult is shrinking and public support is evaporating has them flopping like fish out of water.
At least RMN had the good sense to resign. We won't be so lucky with trump. And Nixon's crime pales against the malignant narcissist's.
JD Vance said, “I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler. How's that for discouraging?”
Adolf Hitler led the Nazi Party, officially named the National Socialist German Workers' Party (or Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, abbreviated as NSDAP). He became its absolute leader, or Führer, in July 1921 and ruled Germany through it from 1933 until 1945
Means?
Being Socialist
And pro-workers
Are being "Nazis WERE were far Right fascists and racists".
Vladimir Lenin led the Bolsheviks, a radical faction that split from the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in 1903. The group became an independent party in 1912 and was later renamed the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) in 1918
The Original Chinese NameIn Chinese, the party is called: 中国共产党 (Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng).Breaking this name down character-by-character reveals how its core definition is rooted in the very mechanisms of socialism:中国 (Zhōngguó): China / Chinese.共 (Gòng): Shared, collective, common, or public.产 (Chǎn): Property, production, industry, or wealth.党 (Dǎng): Party or association.Elaborating the Translation to Reveal "Socialism"When you merge the two core conceptual blocks—共产 (Gòngchǎn) and 党 (Dǎng)—the true, underlying ideological mechanism is laid bare:
The Literal Meaning of Gòngchǎn: Rather than the English buzzword "Communist," Gòngchǎn translates literally to "Shared Property" or "Collective Production."
The Link to Socialism: By political definition, the foundational doctrine of socialism is the public/collective ownership of the means of production. Because Gòngchǎn explicitly means the collectivization of industry and assets, the literal translation of the party's name is the "Party for the Collective Ownership of Production" or the "Shared Property Party."
Why "Socialist" Fits More Accurately Than "Communist" In Marxist theory, "Communism" represents the final, theoretical stage of human evolution: a classless, stateless, moneyless global society. Neither Mao's China nor today's China ever claimed to have achieved communism.
Instead, Mao declared that China had entered the "socialist stage"—the transitional phase where a strong state manages the collective economy. Therefore, translating Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng as the "Chinese Collective Production Party" aligns perfectly with its actual historical and economic functioning as a socialist state.
Pol Pot and his core leadership did not initially use this title for themselves.2. The Illusion of "Democratic" Kampuchea When the party overthrew the government on April 17, 1975, they renamed the entire country Democratic Kampuchea. Despite the democratic labeling—a common branding tactic among 20th-century Marxist-Leninist states—the nation functioned as a brutal, totalitarian one-party state.
3. Extreme Secrecy and AngkarFor the first two years of their horrific reign (1975–1977), Pol Pot deliberately kept the existence of the Communist Party a total secret from the public and the outside world. Instead, citizens were forced to pledge total obedience to a shadowy, faceless entity known simply as Angkar (អង្គការ), which translates directly to "The Organization."Angkar Padevat: Often called the "Revolutionary Organization."Angkar Loeu: Called the "Higher Organization."It wasn't until a public radio speech by Pol Pot in September 1977 that the regime officially admitted "Angkar" was actually the Communist Party of Kampuchea, publicly confirming their adherence to Marxist-Leninist ideology.
4. The Goal: Radical Agrarian Socialism Pol Pot’s regime was an extreme, ultra-left deviation of socialism. Heavily influenced by Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution in China, Pol Pot sought to skip the traditional steps of socialist development. They forcefully evacuated cities, abolished money, banned private property, and eliminated markets overnight to create a pure agrarian socialist utopia. This disastrous social engineering experiment resulted in the Cambodian Genocide, costing the lives of an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people.
There is NO LIE commies will not use to take power. (like... calling oneself Democrats, just lije Pol Pot)
And there us NO moral or any other restraints that woukd stop em in their "experimenting".(like "Cambodian Genocide, costing the lives of an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people." -- that's just for peanuts, for em)
No fVcking kidding. That was very obvious. But you posted it, indicating agreement. You posted it for no reason?
Gemini's response to "What is Intellectual cowardice"... Intellectual cowardice is the refusal or reluctance to confront complex, uncomfortable ideas, defend a stated claim, or question deeply held personal beliefs due to fear of criticism or social rejection.🛑
Why (in your cretinic delusions) am I too scared to have looked that up?
Was this "Sea Major" posting here before? Do he react to something in blog post itself or in comments? Do he returns to see the answers and comment on em?
Means -- do he BEHAVE as any common *human* poster on the internet? ;-p
//Why (in your cretinic delusions) am I too scared to have looked that up?
Because of your previous deflection "Your admission, yes? Well, one made without realizing it."
While.
MY claim was OBVIOUSLY about YOUR behavior here. ;-p
So what, cretin?
You are ready to demonstrate intellectual bravery and admit that that:
""Gemini's response to "What is Intellectual cowardice"... Intellectual cowardice is the refusal or reluctance to confront complex, uncomfortable ideas, defend a stated claim, or question deeply held personal beliefs due to fear of criticism or social rejection.🛑""
Name and cite ONE elected Democrat who has advocated a one-party communist dictatorship, along with complete government ownership of all means of production and distribution.
There is NO LIE that MAGAts won't use to take power.
Unless you have PROOF Biden stole the 2020 election. Put up or shut up, goose-stepper. Yes, your MAGA cult is following Hitler's playbook in Big Lies and falsely framing and demonizing any opposition as communist.
But then, you are incredibly willfuly IGNORANT of history and reality.
Come on, sport. I DARE you to show us evidence Trump lost due to "rigging" and massive voter fraud. What's the matter, cult got your tongue?
Cretin doesn't believe in research. No surprise there. Or the historical record that shows that, before social security, a large number of elderly people did live in poverty in the US. But those facts likely get another "yawn" from you, right?
FYI, "yawn" isn't a rebuttal. But cretin probably thinks it's a solid refutation, yes?
Probably. Not under "Sea Major". But Minus allows any name to be entered. So, it's likely a repeat commenter just using a different name. You think that's not possible?
Qtard: Do he react to something in blog post itself or in comments? Do he returns to see the answers and comment on em?
No to both of your questions.
Qtard: Means -- do he BEHAVE as any common *human* poster on the internet? ;-p
Yes, he is behaving as a human poster on the internet might. You say a human commenter CAN'T spread the same comment around to other blogs? What (in your cretinic mind) prevents a person from doing this? No human could possibly do this? Why not?
Cretin thinks that Gemini gave me an answer about myself? When I asked "What is Intellectual cowardice", and not "What is Intellectual cowardice, and do I exhibit it". And Gemini gave me a definition. And didn't add, "Yes, you are an intellectual coward".
But you think I did get that reply? Due to being insane? In addition to being a cretin that thinks AI Chatbots insult people asking for definitions. You probably think Gemini knows all about my (alleged by you) cretinity. So, it (of course) gave that answer about me being an intellectual coward (in your delusions), right?
The answer obviously applies to YOU. Though it wasn't specifically about you (given that I didn't mention you or myself). But that's why you reply with ad hominem so often instead of facts. Because your (very large) ego can't accept you being wrong.
...Just like International Communists (ala Trotsky) hate those who would limit Communism to one nation (ala Stalin). And we all know what happened to "actual communists" like Trotsky (assassinated by Stalin).
Are the "actual" socialists aligned with the Socialist International (like the DSA once was, but now is part of the Progressive International)?
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is no longer part of or aligned with the Socialist International.
Former Membership: The DSA (and its predecessor, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee) was a member of the Socialist International from 1982 to 2017.
The Split: At its national convention in August 2017, DSA members voted to sever ties with the Socialist International.
Reasoning: Delegates argued that the international body and its European social-democratic member parties had embraced neoliberalism, supported austerity measures, and failed to adequately challenge global capitalism.
Current Affiliations: The DSA maintains international ties with other organizations instead, such as joining the Progressive International in 2023 and becoming an associate of the São Paulo Forum.
The São Paulo Forum (Spanish: Foro de São Paulo) is a regional conference and alliance of left-wing political parties and social movements from Latin America and the Caribbean.
Origins & Purpose
The Foundation: It was founded in 1990 in São Paulo, Brazil, by Fidel Castro (then-President of Cuba) and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (leader of the Brazilian Workers' Party).The Goal: Originally named the Meeting of Left and Anti-imperialist Parties and Organizations of Latin America, its core purpose was to debate the new international landscape after the fall of the Berlin Wall and formulate alternatives to neoliberal economic policies and US influence in the region.
But hey, you guys aren't "actual" commies.... yet.
Also, what (in your delusions) is the purpose of these (alleged by you) "bot comments"? Deploying bots isn't something someone can do for free. It costs money. So, there must be a reason why bots would be deployed to a blog hardly anyone reads. A reason that would make it worth it to whoever is paying. You think bots are just released and make fake comments for zero cost? (that's not how bots work).
FYI, I'm not saying the "Sea Major" comment is definitely not a bot. I'm saying that it is very unlikely. And that it is probably a real person. Also that your logic doesn't hold up. A real person absolutely can leave comments and not check back for replies (and engage with them). Just because you think people don't do this (they do)... that's NOT proof the comments were made by a bot.
The Progressive International (PI) is a global left-wing political organization that unites democratic socialists, communists, labor unions, and social movements. It describes itself as a worldwide, anti-capitalist front aimed at countering what it views as a global rise in authoritarian nationalism and "disaster capitalism"
Origins and Foundation
The Founders: The organization was first conceptualized in 2018 by the Sanders Institute (founded by the family of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders) and the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25, led by former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis).Official Launch: It was formally launched in May 2020 during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of creating a durable international infrastructure for the global left.
Core Pillars of Work
The Progressive International coordinates its global efforts across three distinct operational branches:
Movement: A "movement of movements" that brings together over 70 left-wing political organizations, trade unions, feminist collectives, indigenous groups, and climate activist groups across the globe.
Blueprint: A policy workshop where activists, thinkers, and politicians collaborate to draft blueprints for alternative global systems, such as designing a global Green New Deal or tackling international debt.
Wire: A multilingual grassroots media and news service that amplifies the ongoing struggles of labor and social movements worldwide.
Strategic Goals & Principles
According to its inaugural Declaration, the Progressive International advocates for a "post-capitalist" world that is:Anti-Imperialist and Intersectional: Explicitly opposing economic hegemony, military interventions, and systemic oppression based on race, gender, or identity.
Ecological: Organizing global actions, such as the Make Amazon Pay campaign, to demand environmental accountability and green labor transitions.
Solidaristic: Organizing transnational support for striking workers, marginalized indigenous factions, and democratic movements facing political suppression.Notable Members & AdvisorsThe alliance boasts a diverse international roster. Its Advisory Council has featured prominent left-wing figures such as linguist Noam Chomsky, author Naomi Klein, Indian writer Arundhati Roy, and former progressive world leaders like Rafael Correa (Ecuador).Its institutional membership includes organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Guatemala's ruling Movimiento Semilla, and prominent global labor unions like the Telangana Gig and Platform Workers Union in India.
Was the Nazi Party under Adolf Hitler socialist and pro worker?
Google response...
No, the Nazi party under Adolf Hitler was not socialist, nor was it truly pro-worker. The consensus among professional historians is that the term "National Socialist" was a deliberate propaganda tool designed to draw German workers away from actual Marxist socialism and trade unions.
Once in power, Hitler’s regime systematically dismantled worker rights and operated an economy that directly benefited major private corporations.🛑
Means?
There is NO LIE cretins like Qtard will not use to support fascism. Like... comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin.
Gemini: USAID funding cuts by the U.S. government have led to an estimated 700,000 deaths globally since early 2025.
But that's just peanuts to the fascists Qtard defends with his moronity.
That was your claim all the way -- that said Democrats, Progressives, Socialists, Communists or whatever they decided to call oneself are all as one a self-sacrificing do-gooders. %^P
Whose inly purpose in life -- making life of OTHERS better and easier. ;-p
Not mine.))))))
\\The consensus among professional historians is that the term "National Socialist" was a deliberate propaganda tool designed to draw German workers away from actual Marxist socialism and trade unions.
Like one in Soviet Union? ;-p
THERE was "actual Marxist socialism and trade unions"? )))
//There is NO LIE cretins like Qtard will not use to support fascism. Like... comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin.
Yo, cretin. ;-p
You forgot Hitler. ))))
But... I understand your problem very well -- even to your cretinic brain it would be toom cringy -- to blame me for "supporting fascism"... with admitting me rediculing and placing Hitler in one busket with Mao, Stalin and Pik Pot. ;-p
So, even though you... itself, in this same very post got scorning me for calling him socialist. ;-p
In the end -- you "forgot" to mention him in last sentence "comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin." )))))
141 comments:
Yet one war?
Yawn.
But do this one eligible for Nobel prize?
Cretin" is much more shorter and to the point and disc ribs LES to the "T".
Orgs like Nobel are the problem.
Turd-2 is trying to choke off Democrat's funding sources. It's another of their attempts to cheat to retain power permanently. The same as with their false allegations against The SPLC.
Meanwhile the corrupt scotus recently ruled that corporations and oligarchs can give unlimited funds to republican campaigns. They couldn't be more transparent. They're trying to make legit funding sources for Democrats illegal while making their own corrupt funding sources legal.
lol! Kamala Harris's presidential campaign significantly outspent Donald Trump's campaign during the 2024 election cycle, with Harris spending over $1 billion compared to Trump's roughly $470 million to $650 million depending on the tracked committee metrics.
The party that claims to stand for tolerance keeps finding common cause with people who despise every value it claims to hold, from theocrats abroad to street-level agitators who excuse political violence at home. You don’t have to believe in a grand conspiracy to notice the pattern. Coalitions are built on votes, not principles, and this one has been assembled from groups that agree on almost nothing except who they want out of power.
The “So Called Leaders” in the American, Socialist, Progressive, Communist Democratic Party Hakeem Jeffries, and Chuck Schumer have introduced legislation to add justices to the Supreme Court,(Pad the Court) and the party’s most prominent voices, Hakeem Jeffries and Kamala Harris both of them have said everything is on the table if they retake Congress. Call it reform if you want. Adding more, and more seats until you get the rulings you want is still adding seats until you get the rulings you want. The same logic applies to admitting the District of Columbia and pushing Puerto Rico toward Statehood. The House has already passed D.C. statehood twice. Two new States mean 4 new Senators, and nobody pretends both parties would benefit equally. Also States run by Democratic legislatures have made gender transition treatments available to minors with minimal parental involvement, treatments a child cannot meaningfully consent to and can’t undo.
All that plus the fact that Senator Bernie Sanders’s “MEDICARE FOR ALL BILL “would make it illegal for private and employer health plans to exist. Traditional Medicare, the program that more than 64 million Americans currently rely on, is being folded into a new government system, along with Medicaid and the ACA exchanges. Medicare Advantage, which 55 percent of eligible seniors have chosen, disappears too. A 2024 analysis by the Center for Health and Economy put the price tag for Kamala Harris’s version at nearly $44 trillion in added federal spending over 10 years. This isn’t a public option next to what you have now. It’s a replacement for it, whether you asked for one or not.
That ’is NOT consent of the Governed. That’s a rule change all dressed up as Reform.
It’s ALL on the bill plain for the eye to see, the platform language, the floor speeches., all of it! The American, Socialist, Progressive, Communist Democratic Party isn’t hiding the plan. It’s right there just daring you to read it.
Les Carpenter Said:
We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stupidity.
As expected Dave Dubya once again deflects.
If socialism is so great why aren't Americans moving to CUBA? Because, and all please note, Cuba is a failure. Socialism is a failure, it must have the rich to fund their failed policy's. Without capitalism, without other people's money, socialism fails. Can you give us an example where this is not true?
So Dave and your gang, when are you moving to Cuba or Canada? Living the dream?
When?
As I was reading this blog I noticed that a few people has made remarks about Shaw’s Crap House Blog reminding me that I had made several attempts to post there Defending the unfair posts about our President Donald Trump but my comments failed to ever see the light of being published.
LOL! That has nothing to do with what I wrote. Also, entities other than campaigns spent money on the election. el0n musk basically bought twitter to spread disinformation in support of trump, for example.
Trump Prize? ;-p
A Turd- is the best way to describe the Cretin Les.
To clarify: You referred to funding (for the campaign of Kamala Harris) that happened BEFORE trump became president a second time. Turd-2 didn't exist at the time, so how can what you wrote have ANYTHING to do with your post? When your post is about things that are happening now that Turd-2 does exist?
You don't understand that time is linear?
What exactly is this "Trump corruption"? :dunno:
For a freaking DECADE the demented LEFT have been clamoring about whatever it is, but all they've come up with they had to fabricate. All made up bullshit.
Russia Russia Russia.
Fake real-estate corruption changes in NY and FLA.
"Classified documents".
On and on.
All FAKE.
Poor Chuckie, Schumer He's going to be Ousted by a Female Communist MORON, but he's more concerned about Emmanuel Orangestein.
Pathetic
The Supreme Court has allowed the construction on the White House Ballroom to continue.
It’s not any violation of the Constitution in any way which does not address building rights and its another win for President Trump.
Who Cares? Lets see now. Obama put in a basketball court, Ford put in a swimming pool those were personal use projects. The ballroom is actually functional for government use or I suppose you'd rather keep having state dinners or other affairs in a rented tent, or somewhere where another Lunatic Commie Democrat could shoot up the place!
So much of what those on the Lunatic Left says, and repeatsd over and over again , Is Not True, a Hoax, or Just Plain Fiction spread by the American Democratic, Socialist Progressive, Communist Dolts, who Lack Intelligence, Common Sense, idiots, Morons, and Meatheads.
Have you not noticed how all the popular, and well-known :Fact Checking “Organizations” NEVER seem to go after the NYT, the WaPo, the BoGlob, the LAT, The New orker, The Nation, The Daily Kos, BuzzFeed, the FBU, the CIA, the DOJ, the State Department, the UN, et al.? Why? Because they are all one of the same!
And have you noticed that the “Progressive Press Propagandists” don't hold the sway that they used to. They've screamed "Wolf" too many times and they have rung the Alarm s, and rang the Bells too often.
And another thing Good people don't like being called Nazis, Hitler’s, or Fascists and millions of Good people will go to the polls just simply to vote against whoever is smearing them,
Make NO mistake about it 80% plus of Americans think the possibility of Iran's Nuclear program threatens the US and thats the main reason why they support President Trum.
An 85 % of Americans and the Majority of voters support using military action to stop Tehran from obtaining Nuclear Weapons
Most Americans oppose Iran war but want regime change, freedom for Iranians, no nuclear threat.
June 22, 2026.
A total of 83% said it was important for the US to permanently end the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, and 88% said it was important to stop Iran from posing a threat to other countries.
Specifically, most Americans suspect Iran's nuclear program has not been permanently stopped, and that Iran will not stop threatening its neighbors.
Continuing to grunt your stuff I see.
Authoritarianism and dictatorships are failures.
Socialism is not.
Well, Veronica, perhaps you should consider how you present your post. Be respectful and bring receipts in support of your opinion and she'll probably post your commen. Probably respond as well, I'm guessing.
Whatever makes your whittle mind happy anymouse.
The Babbling Bullshit of a Deranged Sea Major.
Pathetic
Like in USSR? China under Mao?
Pol Pot? ;-p
What else stories of "success of Socialism"you can propose?
More Babbling Bullshit.
Then don't be a Nazi, Fascist, or Hitler. It's simple.
trump is sucking pond water in the polls. And 70% disapprove of his war of aggression and choice in Iran.
That Olnly Shows How Stupid our Voters Really Are.
No, it shows how ignorant, misguided, and deluded MAGA voters are.
Shut your DAMRD IDIOTIC FILTHY, DISGUSTING MOUTH!
The Lying Creep Abdul El-Sayed is now distancing himself from Hasan Piker is all a show. By this, I bet right after the General Election they will be inseparable. This is all show by El-Sayed. Remember Virginia, how the now Governor said she would not support certain legislation and the day after she was sworn in she did just the opposite. SHE LIED, the same as ED-SAYED lies. By the way just in case you didn’t alters know it , Michigan, Abdul Ed-Sayed HATES YOU.
As if the Phony Michigan Democratic Socialist Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is struggling in the polls. His opponent, Republican Mike Rogers, is also trailing in every survey of Michigan’s voters in August except one, reliably drawing between 45 and 48 percent support. But those last few percentage points can make or break a candidacy, and Michigan Democrats have made it abundantly clear that the polls are covering up bigger problems for El-Sayed’s campaign.What Michigan Democrat Debbie Dingell called the “crisis” represented by the well known and Hated and strongly Dis-liked Hasan Piker’s participation in her state’s politics continued Saturday as El-Sayed persisted in his effort to distance himself from the scandalizing influencer,
I’M MAGA MOW MORE THEN EVER!
Abdul El-Sayed’s Non-Apolog Your
What’s that all about you may ask?
It means now that going after President Trump didn’t work to much. h’e’ll Now go after Vice President Vance.
Abdul El-Sayed released the following statement:
“I was horrified and heartbroken this afternoon to hear the reports of an active shooter at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield. I’m thankful that no worshippers, students, or teachers were harmed. We all owe a debt of gratitude to temple security and law enforcement, who acted swiftly to keep the community safe.
“To my Jewish sisters and brothers, you have a right to worship in peace. You have a right to send your kids to the synagogue in the morning and know they’ll come home safely at night. And you have a right to know that your religious identity and faith practice are respected.
“There is no room for antisemitism in America. So today and everyday, I am standing in solidarity with all of us who value our right to pray how we choose to pray against antisemitism and hate in all its forms.”
There is NO PLACE IN THIS COUNTRY FOR AN IDIOT LIKE HIM.
The Democrat’s Leader Hakeem Jeffries could not answer when asked “Whet is the Democratic’s Agenda “.
He does have skin-in-the-game... ;)
Yes, we do prefer productive investment (Trump/Twitter) rather than non-productive investments (Harris celebrity endorsement model)
Chavez's Socialismo del Sigloi XXI...
Ignore the receipts part... all comments with receipts go to moderation
^^Biggest babbler^^
LET CARPENTER;
We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stup of
We NEVER should have allowed ourselves to be an empire in the first place, actually. The fall will be a hard one and I'm guessing our grandchildren and great grandchilkdren will not forgive us or our stupid.
Minus: all comments with receipts go to moderation.
You mean BS receipts.
Minus: Yes, we do prefer productive investment (Trump/Twitter) rather than non-productive investments (Harris celebrity endorsement model).
Right. To spread your propaganda. And now Turd-2 is approving rightturd billionaires gobbling up existing media. To further spread your propaganda. While also using the FCC to intimidate and suppress truth telling.
btw, I don't deny that the Harris team blew it. She could have spent her money more effectively to counter rightturd propaganda and win by less narrow margin (preventing it from being stolen, which it was).
Though, that idea still not came to his genious mind.
Because, he is not in giving business. Only taking.
Has anybody saw answers from this Sea Baby? ;-p
To thunk that that is not just a spambot. ;-p
Still talking with bots?
Then -- open anon posting in your blog. Start posting about politics.
And... "they will come"... and you'll never be alone, again.
The House Democrats, including Democratic leader of the house Hakeem Jeffries (of New York, Just Handed You Proof They Won’t Say No To Socialism! On last Tuesday night, the House of Representatives voted on something you’d think would be very easy to put into . Stand up for American core ideals, say socialism is bad, sit back down. Instead, 192 Democrats looked at that microphone and walked away. Only eight crossed over to join Republicans. Two couldn’t even commit to a yes or a no and voted present instead. The decision by our colleagues blind sided the entire House
Let that just sink in for a minute! . This wasn’t a bill to cut a Program or Raise Taxes. It was a “Resolution,” a piece of paper with no legal teeth, asking members of Congress to say that Socialism has led to Famine, Repression, and the Deaths of over One Hundred Million People Worldwide, and that it Has No Place in this Country.
Here’s what happened! Here’s the result. Here’s the number that should worry every single single Democrat. And every strategist in Washington. The last time the House voted on a Resolution like this, was back in November od 1986, and the Democrats supported it. This time, only eight did. That’s not just a small shift. That’s a party that has been dragged, Primary by Primary, away from anything resembling the center and toward the single Democrat Socialists of America’s platform of abolishing the Senate as we know it! And opening the door to Noncitizen voting, and telling the voters flat out that America has never been a Democracy in the first place.
The current Democratic leadership’s excuse was that the Resolution also backed the SAVE America Act’s citizenship and photo ID requirements for voting, and that this made it a Poison Pill. Nearly two hundred House Democrats would rather protect their own asses than say, on the record, that requiring proof you’re an American citizen to vote in an American election is a good idea! And that my friends is a damn shame!
The result is that Two Hundred and Eighteen years after the Constitution set this country up to guard against exactly this kind of concentrated, unaccountable power, House Democrats couldn’t muster the votes to say Socialism is bad and citizens should decide American elections. Eighty-six of them could say it in November. Eight could say it now. Do the math on where that trend ends.
lol! You'd be surprised as to the lengths some people will go to prevent the loss of their argument.
Means? Behave as cretinic "professor" itself? ;-p
Well. Sure. Such idea can caught it in surprise. )))
Right.
More red scare fascist hysteria and hate.
How about Trump's "charities" for his personal gain?
And look at his pal in Florida.
Ron and Casey DeSantis: These two crooks stole $10 million from a settlement with a charity, wired it to Casey’s fake “charity,” laundered it through two puppet organizations, and then used it for political ads in an election year. They should be in jail. Casey DeSantis’s “charity” is a complete sham. It never filed paperwork with the IRS. It has no minutes from meetings. No website. And no evidence of doing anything legal or legitimate.
The only reason DeSantis appointed Ashley Moody to Rubio’s senate seat is because she aided and abetted him in stealing $10 million dollars of Florida taxpayers funds for his wife’s charity.
The "One Rule" of the land is, "It's OK if you are a Republican".
ERADICATE THE DIAPERHEADS!
I see that Dave Dubya
is back here again
Now we have him and His SHIT-HEAD Puppy here. TWO SHITHEADS
How long could the Lindsay Clancy jury remain deadlocked? And now the Jy asked them AGIN TO CONTINUE TRYING
How long could the Lindsay Clancy jury remain deadlocked? And now the Judge asked them AGIN TO CONTINUE TRYING
I welcome the hatred from racists and neo-Nazis. It means I'm on the right side of decency and history.
//It means I'm on the right side...
Means -- you are republican. ;-p
Like this guy?
JD Vance: There is this crazy idea in the Democratic Party that if you just repeat insane ideas, eventually the American people are going to believe them.
JD Vance: If I have to create stories so that the media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do.
JD Vance: “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the dogs”.
JD Vance: I’m trying to focus on doing as much of God’s work as possible right now. And if that leads to the end times, okay.”
JD Vance: "The professors are the enemy"
JD Vance “I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler. How's that for discouraging?”
Donald Trump is bringing PEACE to Iran by bombing it. The Iranian people are dancing in the streets and praising Trump's name for dropping bombs on them and threatening to wipe them out of existence. The relatives of dead Iranians are loving Trump for sending their relatives to the afterlife, bringing them ultimate peace.
The parents of the school children that got taken out by the U.S. Tomahawk missile are so happy their children are in paradise👼. When they heard their kids were dead they also started dancing in the streets, thanking Donald Trump and the US military for liberating their kids from their lives👼.
The same as Palestinians are loving Netanyahu, thanking him, and asking to be bombed and shot MORE. Donald Trump should win MULTIPLE peace prizes for how much he is helping Muslims in the Middle East🏆🏆🏆.
If the Muslim is an Iranian and hates their regime or a Gazan who hates Hamas, they are happy to die to take out the evildoers keeping them down. If not, then they are on the side of the Iranian regime or Hamas. And Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are doing them a bigly favor by sending them to Hell to collect their 72 virgins❤️🔥😁
Minus: lol! You'd be surprised as to the lengths some people will go to prevent the loss of their argument.
At first I was surprised at how capable you are at doing this. Not any longer, however.
I don't censor other people's arguments. That is intellectually dishonest, IMO.
No, W, I'm not a Peter Thiel 'construct' fan. Not that he isn't 1,000x better than every Democrat sans Fetterman.
Oh my! Hit a nerve did I?
Hmm, you should sit with that awhile. Honestly. Without your stories.
You might actually grow beyond your hate.
Naaah. It's not...
""True intellectual honesty means the pursuit of truth comes before personal politics or beliefs. An intellectually honest person changes their view when presented with better evidence. An intellectually dishonest person twists or ignores the evidence to protect their original conclusion""
...destroying possibility of discussion -- it's not about honesty or dishonesty.
It's intellectual cowardness and seeking of power same time.
Intellectual cowardice is the refusal to engage with ideas, facts, or arguments that challenge your existing beliefs, comfort, or social standing.<<---- sounds familiar? ;-)
It is a psychological and philosophical defense mechanism where a person prioritizes emotional safety and conformity over truth and objective reality.<<--- this too
Unlike general cowardice, which involves a fear of physical danger, intellectual cowardice is rooted in the fear of being wrong, ostracized, or forced to change.
Key Traits of Intellectual CowardiceIntellectual cowardice manifests in several distinct behaviors, which can be grouped by how a person handles challenging information:
Avoidance of Discomfort
Echo chambers: Surrounding oneself only with people and media that confirm existing biases.
Tone policing: Dismissing a valid argument purely because of how it was delivered, rather than addressing what was said.
willful ignorance: Intentionally choosing not to research or look at evidence that might disprove a cherished belief.
Defensive ThinkingStrawman arguments: Misrepresenting an opponent's complex view as something weak or ridiculous so it is easier to attack.
Ad hominem attacks: Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.
Compartmentalization: Holding two contradictory beliefs at the same time to avoid the mental strain of resolving them.
Social ConformityGroupthink: Agreeing with a community or political faction blindly out of fear of being cancelled or rejected.
Silence: Refusing to speak up for a known truth because it is unpopular or risky to do so.Intellectual
Cowardice vs. Intellectual HumilityTo better understand the concept, it helps to compare it to its opposite virtue:
FeatureIntellectual CowardiceIntellectual Humility / Courage
Reaction to being wrongAnger, denial, or personal attacksCuriosity, acceptance, and adaptation
Handling opposing viewsCensoring, mocking, or ignoring themListening, analyzing, and debating them
Primary goalProtecting the ego and social statusFinding the objective truth
View of certaintyBelieves they already know everythingAcknowledges the limits of their knowledgeWhy
People Fall Into It
Intellectual cowardice is rarely driven by a lack of intelligence. <<--- yeah, but -- first you are coward...
and then you are dumb
Fear -- making one dumb and dumber.
Yaaawn
Instead, it is driven by human psychology.Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
Intellectual cowardice is the refusal to engage with ideas, facts, or arguments that challenge your existing beliefs, comfort, or social standing.<<---- sounds familiar? ;-)
It is a psychological and philosophical defense mechanism where a person prioritizes emotional safety and conformity over truth and objective reality.<<--- this too
Unlike general cowardice, which involves a fear of physical danger, intellectual cowardice is rooted in the fear of being wrong, ostracized, or forced to change.
Key Traits of Intellectual CowardiceIntellectual cowardice manifests in several distinct behaviors, which can be grouped by how a person handles challenging information:
Avoidance of Discomfort
Echo chambers: Surrounding oneself only with people and media that confirm existing biases.
Tone policing: Dismissing a valid argument purely because of how it was delivered, rather than addressing what was said.
willful ignorance: Intentionally choosing not to research or look at evidence that might disprove a cherished belief.
Defensive ThinkingStrawman arguments: Misrepresenting an opponent's complex view as something weak or ridiculous so it is easier to attack.
Ad hominem attacks: Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.
Compartmentalization: Holding two contradictory beliefs at the same time to avoid the mental strain of resolving them.
Social ConformityGroupthink: Agreeing with a community or political faction blindly out of fear of being cancelled or rejected.
Silence: Refusing to speak up for a known truth because it is unpopular or risky to do so.Intellectual
Cowardice vs. Intellectual HumilityTo better understand the concept, it helps to compare it to its opposite virtue:
FeatureIntellectual CowardiceIntellectual Humility / Courage
Reaction to being wrongAnger, denial, or personal attacksCuriosity, acceptance, and adaptation
Handling opposing viewsCensoring, mocking, or ignoring themListening, analyzing, and debating them
Primary goalProtecting the ego and social statusFinding the objective truth
View of certaintyBelieves they already know everythingAcknowledges the limits of their knowledgeWhy
People Fall Into It
Intellectual cowardice is rarely driven by a lack of intelligence. <<--- yeah, but -- first you are coward...
and then you are dumb
Fear -- making one dumb and dumber.
Yaaawn
Instead, it is driven by human psychology.Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
Note to Dave Dubya, Sorry But I refuse to hold a ONE SIDED CONVERSATION wit an Idiot like you.
My Message to Deplorable Yankee:
Don't allow that Jackass to call you a Nazi . He's most likely not even intelligent to know just what a "Nazi" is. But he doesn't even
deserve to be answered. , so you were correct in not doing so.
Tell Him (Dave Duyba) to go back to Shaw's RAG where he belongs.
It heinous lying propagandistic distortion of -- national-SOCIALISTS.
Hitler&Co was german version of commies...
But for socialists(closet commies) of USA it was unbearable to admit -- that they, while having Russian commies as allies, fight against german commies... both of which they helped to empower..
And Black Americans should go back to where they came from, according your Malevolent Mendacious Messiah.
DY,
What you are afraid of is having a two-sided conversation. This is why you need to project and call me an idiot.
Veronica,
"I welcome the hatred from racists and neo-Nazis" was directed at Anonymous who called me a shithead. That's the kind of hate to expect from neo-Nazis.
I addressed DY by name. "DY, what you are afraid of is having a two-sided conversation. This is why you need to project and call me an idiot."
Apparently you're also terrified of a two-sided conversation. You can't tolerate facts or criticism of your Leader. This is why you call me a Jackass. Another neo-Nazi trait, BTW. Feel free to call me a smartass, though. ;-)
How do you know DY is "anonymous", anyway? Are you psychic? Or deranged?
Anonymous,
We see you have a weak grasp of history and political ideologies. Trump has you believing Democrats are commies and Black people were "eating the dogs in Springfield". Himmler smiles from Hell to see his racist proteges destroy American democracy.
You see, Nazis WERE were far Right fascists and racists, not communists. Nazis HATED communists, just like you hate Democrats. Nazis also HATED Democrats like FDR for helping Russia kill more Nazis than any other allied country.
Let me help you out. Trump is a LIAR. He LOST a fair election to Biden, and sent a violent mob of CRIMINALS to overturn it. READ and LEARN to develop critical thinking. You show us you have no grasp of it, and this is why you are terrified of a two-sided conversation with people like me.
http://www.davedubya.com/2026/08/critical-thinking.html
If you are ONLY going call people names as you usually do and blame others for doing it then YOU ARE NOT WORTH AN ANSWER OR AS NY Furniture communication With
GO BACK TO THE SHIT HOLE FROM WHICH YOU CAME FROM AND WHERE YOU BELONG
Minus: He does have skin-in-the-game... ;)
He does not. trump has ZERO claim on any Nobel prize. The Nobel committee is not located in the United States and has no obligation to give a prize to someone simply because they think they should get one. The Nobel Prize that donald trump does have belongs to María Corina Machado.
Gemini: The Norwegian Nobel Committee clarified that while the physical medal can change hands, the official title of a Nobel laureate cannot be transferred or revoked, meaning Trump did not become an official prize winner through the gesture.
Norwegian politicians and commentators openly criticized the exchange, calling the decision to hand the award to Donald Trump "absurd" and a disrespect to the legacy of the Peace Prize.🛑
Like in USSR? China under Mao?
Pol Pot? ;-p
No, like in the United States since 8/14/1935 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law.
Currently Social Security keeps over 21 million Americans out of poverty each year. Without it, research shows that the poverty rate for Americans aged 65 and older would jump from 8.7% to 43.6%.
Qtard thinks keeping elderly Americans out of poverty is akin to the atrocities of Mao and Pol Pot? How so, Qtard?
Minus: I don't censor other people's arguments. That is intellectually dishonest, IMO.
You just put forward your own intellectually dishonest arguments.
But you do support donald trump's attempts to silence the arguments of the Left, don't you? I don't recall any criticisms from you concerning his lawsuits against News Organizations whose reporting he doesn't like and FCC attempts to silence them.
A person cannot post a comment and never engage? That's proof positive a comment was made by a bot according to Qtard?
🤖Gemini: The comment from "Sea Major" is almost certainly not a bot, and the rigid claim that engaging with it "proves stupidity" is a deeply flawed, elitist take on internet behavior.
Why "Sea Major" is Highly Likely a Human.
The comment contains too many specific, contextually relevant quirks to be an automated script. It responds directly to the breaking news from August 31, 2026, where the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 to let the White House ballroom construction continue.
Hyper-Specific Historical Analogies: A generic political bot might say, "Trump wins again, Democrats lose". A human partisan pulls specific, historical grievances out of their memory—like Barack Obama’s basketball court or Gerald Ford’s swimming pool—to justify their current team's actions.
Human Stylistic Errors: The phrase "Who Cares? Lets see now." and the missing apostrophe in "Lets" reflect conversational, unpolished human typing.
High Emotional Realism: The escalations into dramatic rhetoric ("another Lunatic Commie Democrat could shoot up the place!") perfectly mirror standard, highly impassioned internet political commentary. It reads exactly like a standard comment from a highly opinionated, real-life partisan reader.🛑
Qtard: Still talking with bots?
🤖Gemini: This comment by "Beantown Arnie" is overwhelmingly likely to be a real human being, not a bot. The commenter criticizing engaging with a bot is mislabeling aggressive, highly partisan human behavior as a "bot" to shut down discussion and mock people.
Here is the breakdown of why this comment screams "human" and why the author's logic remains completely flawed.
Technical Clues that "Beantown Arnie" is Human.
A political spam script is written to be efficient, but this comment has too many chaotic, organic human footprints...
Regional Slang / Identity: The username "Beantown Arnie" references Boston ("Beantown"), and the list of media outlets includes the "BoGlob" (The Boston Globe). A generic political bot doesn't naturally tie a hyper-local newspaper nickname to a regional username like that. That is the behavior of a real person from New England venting their specific media frustrations.
The "And Another Thing" Rant Structure: The text reads like a stream-of-consciousness monologue. Bots usually have a single point or a structured script. Arnie jumps from media bias, to the CIA, to the phrase "And another thing," to voter psychology. This is how a passionate human types when they are riled up.
Highly Specific Typos and Formatting.
"repeatsd over and over again" (A typo caused by hitting 's' instead of 'e' on a standard QWERTY keyboard).
“Fact Checking “Organizations”” (Mismatched quote marks).
"The New orker" (Missing the 'Y').
"Alarm s" (Accidental space before the 's').
Bots can be programmed to include typos to look human, but they rarely combine them with hyper-local context (BoGlob) and complex sentence structures like this.🛑
Shame on those 8 Democrats👎
Abdul El-Sayed👍
What's the Nobel Committee's skin in the Peace game? Does Sweden get blown up if they award the prize to the wrong person? Didn't think so. No skin-in-the-game.
Social Security is Socialism? So why did 8% of MY income, and 8% of my employer's income go to pay into its "trust" fund? I paid for my Social Security. I OVER-paid for it. A for sh*t mutual fund saved me more $ than Social Security did.
Lawsuits are the calling out of lies, aren;'t theY. lET THE JURIES DECIDE!
^^always comments, but never engages with the arguments^^
Nazi's were Nationalist Socialists ala Mamdani
Minus: Not that he isn't 1,000x better than every Democrat sans Fetterman.
Fetterman is terrible. What a disappointment he turned out to be. The Democrats need to get rid of him ASAP.
As I recall, you were quite adamant that he could not serve in Congress after having a stroke. But now that he revealed himself to be a turncoat, you're fine with him and think he's great. Proof that the stroke was never your problem. You just used that as an excuse to bash him.
Qtard: Our brains are wired to view threats to our identity or worldview the same way they view physical threats—triggering a "fight or flight" response. Overcoming it requires conscious effort, a willingness to sit with cognitive dissonance, and the courage to admit, "I don't know," or "I was wrong."
Your admission, yes? Well, one made without realizing it.
MAGAts can't handle the truth.
-FJ,
You LIE like a racist fascist.
National Socialists HATED actual socialists. They were white nationalists and racists, like your MAGA party of criminals. They loved secret police and concentration camps. Like you.
Reputational.
This guy Dave speaks, and sounds like the NAZIS he’s preaching about
This guy Dave Dubya mentions NAZIS IS EVERY COMMENT HE MAKES . He must have some sort of a hangup with NAZIS
Depends on who said, "I welcome the hatred from racists and neo-Nazis. It means I'm on the right side of decency and history."
What does that make YOU Depends. (How "fitting" for a fascist Diaper Don Trump sucker.)
So why would the poverty rate for Americans aged 65 and older jump from 8.7% to 43.6% if having to pay into social security is such a bad deal and they could have made more investing themselves? Social Security absolutely is socialism.
Except, in many cases the sued party simply folds. Because they figure that Turd-2 will target them and cause them problems if they don't.
The lawsuits are not about "calling out lies", they are about leveraging the power of the presidency for personal gain and to force compliance via intimidation.
Minus: Nazi's were Nationalist Socialists ala Mamdani.
False.
Did YOU ever hear the saying that “Democrats Say , and DO EXACTLY What they accuse the other side of doing .
Well that’s what this Dave guy does!
Too me HE’S totally FULL OF SHIT
Any American that Compares Our President or Vice President to “Hitler” is NOT an American in my eyes. If it’s ok with you then you are as stupid and as Guilty as they are. As for me, I can see that I dy belong here , so Good Bye.
Yikes! The MAGA crazies are out in full force. Knowing that their cult is shrinking and public support is evaporating has them flopping like fish out of water.
At least RMN had the good sense to resign. We won't be so lucky with trump. And Nixon's crime pales against the malignant narcissist's.
JD Vance said, “I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler. How's that for discouraging?”
OK, Google
what was the name of Hitler's party
Adolf Hitler led the Nazi Party, officially named the National Socialist German Workers' Party (or Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, abbreviated as NSDAP). He became its absolute leader, or Führer, in July 1921 and ruled Germany through it from 1933 until 1945
Means?
Being Socialist
And pro-workers
Are being "Nazis WERE were far Right fascists and racists".
And what was name of exemplar commie Lenin?
Vladimir Lenin led the Bolsheviks, a radical faction that split from the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in 1903. The group became an independent party in 1912 and was later renamed the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) in 1918
The Original Chinese NameIn Chinese, the party is called: 中国共产党 (Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng).Breaking this name down character-by-character reveals how its core definition is rooted in the very mechanisms of socialism:中国 (Zhōngguó): China / Chinese.共 (Gòng): Shared, collective, common, or public.产 (Chǎn): Property, production, industry, or wealth.党 (Dǎng): Party or association.Elaborating the Translation to Reveal "Socialism"When you merge the two core conceptual blocks—共产 (Gòngchǎn) and 党 (Dǎng)—the true, underlying ideological mechanism is laid bare:
The Literal Meaning of Gòngchǎn: Rather than the English buzzword "Communist," Gòngchǎn translates literally to "Shared Property" or "Collective Production."
The Link to Socialism: By political definition, the foundational doctrine of socialism is the public/collective ownership of the means of production. Because Gòngchǎn explicitly means the collectivization of industry and assets, the literal translation of the party's name is the "Party for the Collective Ownership of Production" or the "Shared Property Party."
Why "Socialist" Fits More Accurately Than "Communist"
In Marxist theory, "Communism" represents the final, theoretical stage of human evolution: a classless, stateless, moneyless global society. Neither Mao's China nor today's China ever claimed to have achieved communism.
Instead, Mao declared that China had entered the "socialist stage"—the transitional phase where a strong state manages the collective economy. Therefore, translating Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng as the "Chinese Collective Production Party" aligns perfectly with its actual historical and economic functioning as a socialist state.
"Nazi's were Nationalist Socialists ala Mamdani." Yes, and North Korea is democratic republic.
And... most recent. And most horrible.
Of "socialistic experiments".
Pol Pot and his core leadership did not initially use this title for themselves.2. The Illusion of "Democratic" Kampuchea
When the party overthrew the government on April 17, 1975, they renamed the entire country Democratic Kampuchea. Despite the democratic labeling—a common branding tactic among 20th-century Marxist-Leninist states—the nation functioned as a brutal, totalitarian one-party state.
3. Extreme Secrecy and AngkarFor the first two years of their horrific reign (1975–1977), Pol Pot deliberately kept the existence of the Communist Party a total secret from the public and the outside world. Instead, citizens were forced to pledge total obedience to a shadowy, faceless entity known simply as Angkar (អង្គការ), which translates directly to "The Organization."Angkar Padevat: Often called the "Revolutionary Organization."Angkar Loeu: Called the "Higher Organization."It wasn't until a public radio speech by Pol Pot in September 1977 that the regime officially admitted "Angkar" was actually the Communist Party of Kampuchea, publicly confirming their adherence to Marxist-Leninist ideology.
4. The Goal: Radical Agrarian Socialism
Pol Pot’s regime was an extreme, ultra-left deviation of socialism. Heavily influenced by Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution in China, Pol Pot sought to skip the traditional steps of socialist development. They forcefully evacuated cities, abolished money, banned private property, and eliminated markets overnight to create a pure agrarian socialist utopia. This disastrous social engineering experiment resulted in the Cambodian Genocide, costing the lives of an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people.
Conclusion?
Is simple.
There is NO LIE commies will not use to take power. (like... calling oneself Democrats, just lije Pol Pot)
And there us NO moral or any other restraints that woukd stop em in their "experimenting".(like "Cambodian Genocide, costing the lives of an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people." -- that's just for peanuts, for em)
//Dave DubyaSeptember 3, 2026 at 11:50 AM
"Nazi's were Nationalist Socialists ala Mamdani." Yes, and North Korea is democratic republic.
You gotcha Davy.
But it will NEVER make you able to admit simple truth:
There is NO LIE commies will not use to take power. (like... calling oneself Democrats, just like Pol Pot)
Am I right? ;-p
I gave you a chance -- to participate in fair two-sided discussion.
Based on pure historical facts.
But something tells me, that you WILL NOT participate in it. And will try to run away from it
You -- mister Pol Pot.
//Your admission, yes? Well, one made without realizing it.
You cretin)))))
That was copy-pasted response of AI. ;-p
You also can ask your favorite one -- "what is intellectual cowardice?".
But I bet -- you'll be scared to shit to do that. ))))
Yap
Coward.
As all commies.
There's only one place and time when commies are brave -- when they are in a shuting squad. And there opponents standing against the wall.
Yaaaawn.
//🤖Gemini: This comment by "Beantown Arnie" is overwhelmingly likely to be a real human being, not a bot
You cretin dunno.
That "bot" means -- program that do some operation automately.
Like posting some comment into many-many places.
And text to that comment -- written by people -- some propaganda sireading squad of Russia FSB, China secret service...
or even mullahs of Iran.
Yawn.
Qtard: That was copy-pasted response of AI. ;-p
No fVcking kidding. That was very obvious. But you posted it, indicating agreement. You posted it for no reason?
Gemini's response to "What is Intellectual cowardice"... Intellectual cowardice is the refusal or reluctance to confront complex, uncomfortable ideas, defend a stated claim, or question deeply held personal beliefs due to fear of criticism or social rejection.🛑
Why (in your cretinic delusions) am I too scared to have looked that up?
//Bots usually have a single point or a structured script.
Yeah.
And they NOT improve their bots... with using AI, to blend with local audience.
You are sych a cretin.
But, continue-continue, cretin. ))))
Was this "Sea Major" posting here before?
Do he react to something in blog post itself or in comments?
Do he returns to see the answers and comment on em?
Means -- do he BEHAVE as any common *human* poster on the internet? ;-p
Yeah.
Your ziz words -- directly from commies rulebooks.
Yawn.
//Without it, research shows that the poverty rate for Americans aged 65 and older would jump from 8.7% to 43.6%.
Yeah.
"research shows")))))
Yawn.
//Why (in your cretinic delusions) am I too scared to have looked that up?
Because of your previous deflection "Your admission, yes? Well, one made without realizing it."
While.
MY claim was OBVIOUSLY about YOUR behavior here. ;-p
So what, cretin?
You are ready to demonstrate intellectual bravery and admit that that:
""Gemini's response to "What is Intellectual cowardice"... Intellectual cowardice is the refusal or reluctance to confront complex, uncomfortable ideas, defend a stated claim, or question deeply held personal beliefs due to fear of criticism or social rejection.🛑""
was about you? ;-p
Don't think so. )))))
Name and cite ONE elected Democrat who has advocated a one-party communist dictatorship, along with complete government ownership of all means of production and distribution.
There is NO LIE that MAGAts won't use to take power.
Unless you have PROOF Biden stole the 2020 election. Put up or shut up, goose-stepper. Yes, your MAGA cult is following Hitler's playbook in Big Lies and falsely framing and demonizing any opposition as communist.
But then, you are incredibly willfuly IGNORANT of history and reality.
Come on, sport. I DARE you to show us evidence Trump lost due to "rigging" and massive voter fraud. What's the matter, cult got your tongue?
Cretin doesn't believe in research. No surprise there. Or the historical record that shows that, before social security, a large number of elderly people did live in poverty in the US. But those facts likely get another "yawn" from you, right?
FYI, "yawn" isn't a rebuttal. But cretin probably thinks it's a solid refutation, yes?
Yeah, because refuting BS using facts... that's "communist", to you.
Or just more BS. Written because you have no actual argument. As is most often the case with you. Yawn.
Qtard: Was this "Sea Major" posting here before?
Probably. Not under "Sea Major". But Minus allows any name to be entered. So, it's likely a repeat commenter just using a different name. You think that's not possible?
Qtard: Do he react to something in blog post itself or in comments?
Do he returns to see the answers and comment on em?
No to both of your questions.
Qtard: Means -- do he BEHAVE as any common *human* poster on the internet? ;-p
Yes, he is behaving as a human poster on the internet might. You say a human commenter CAN'T spread the same comment around to other blogs? What (in your cretinic mind) prevents a person from doing this? No human could possibly do this? Why not?
Cretin thinks that Gemini gave me an answer about myself? When I asked "What is Intellectual cowardice", and not "What is Intellectual cowardice, and do I exhibit it". And Gemini gave me a definition. And didn't add, "Yes, you are an intellectual coward".
But you think I did get that reply? Due to being insane? In addition to being a cretin that thinks AI Chatbots insult people asking for definitions. You probably think Gemini knows all about my (alleged by you) cretinity. So, it (of course) gave that answer about me being an intellectual coward (in your delusions), right?
The answer obviously applies to YOU. Though it wasn't specifically about you (given that I didn't mention you or myself). But that's why you reply with ad hominem so often instead of facts. Because your (very large) ego can't accept you being wrong.
Now we have TWO American socialist, democratic, communists Here! Lord Save Me Please! What Has My Country Come To
National Socialists HATED actual socialists
...Just like International Communists (ala Trotsky) hate those who would limit Communism to one nation (ala Stalin). And we all know what happened to "actual communists" like Trotsky (assassinated by Stalin).
"I DARE You" Really? Who The Hell are You TO DARE ANYBODY on this b log? A Shit Head Like You Shouldn't DARE Anyone, Davey BOY!
Are the "actual" socialists aligned with the Socialist International (like the DSA once was, but now is part of the Progressive International)?
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is no longer part of or aligned with the Socialist International.
Former Membership: The DSA (and its predecessor, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee) was a member of the Socialist International from 1982 to 2017.
The Split: At its national convention in August 2017, DSA members voted to sever ties with the Socialist International.
Reasoning: Delegates argued that the international body and its European social-democratic member parties had embraced neoliberalism, supported austerity measures, and failed to adequately challenge global capitalism.
Current Affiliations: The DSA maintains international ties with other organizations instead, such as joining the Progressive International in 2023 and becoming an associate of the São Paulo Forum.
The São Paulo Forum (Spanish: Foro de São Paulo) is a regional conference and alliance of left-wing political parties and social movements from Latin America and the Caribbean.
Origins & Purpose
The Foundation: It was founded in 1990 in São Paulo, Brazil, by Fidel Castro (then-President of Cuba) and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (leader of the Brazilian Workers' Party).The Goal: Originally named the Meeting of Left and Anti-imperialist Parties and Organizations of Latin America, its core purpose was to debate the new international landscape after the fall of the Berlin Wall and formulate alternatives to neoliberal economic policies and US influence in the region.
But hey, you guys aren't "actual" commies.... yet.
Also, what (in your delusions) is the purpose of these (alleged by you) "bot comments"? Deploying bots isn't something someone can do for free. It costs money. So, there must be a reason why bots would be deployed to a blog hardly anyone reads. A reason that would make it worth it to whoever is paying. You think bots are just released and make fake comments for zero cost? (that's not how bots work).
FYI, I'm not saying the "Sea Major" comment is definitely not a bot. I'm saying that it is very unlikely. And that it is probably a real person. Also that your logic doesn't hold up. A real person absolutely can leave comments and not check back for replies (and engage with them). Just because you think people don't do this (they do)... that's NOT proof the comments were made by a bot.
The Progressive International (PI) is a global left-wing political organization that unites democratic socialists, communists, labor unions, and social movements. It describes itself as a worldwide, anti-capitalist front aimed at countering what it views as a global rise in authoritarian nationalism and "disaster capitalism"
Origins and Foundation
The Founders: The organization was first conceptualized in 2018 by the Sanders Institute (founded by the family of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders) and the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25, led by former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis).Official Launch: It was formally launched in May 2020 during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of creating a durable international infrastructure for the global left.
Core Pillars of Work
The Progressive International coordinates its global efforts across three distinct operational branches:
Movement: A "movement of movements" that brings together over 70 left-wing political organizations, trade unions, feminist collectives, indigenous groups, and climate activist groups across the globe.
Blueprint: A policy workshop where activists, thinkers, and politicians collaborate to draft blueprints for alternative global systems, such as designing a global Green New Deal or tackling international debt.
Wire: A multilingual grassroots media and news service that amplifies the ongoing struggles of labor and social movements worldwide.
Strategic Goals & Principles
According to its inaugural Declaration, the Progressive International advocates for a "post-capitalist" world that is:Anti-Imperialist and Intersectional: Explicitly opposing economic hegemony, military interventions, and systemic oppression based on race, gender, or identity.
Ecological: Organizing global actions, such as the Make Amazon Pay campaign, to demand environmental accountability and green labor transitions.
Solidaristic: Organizing transnational support for striking workers, marginalized indigenous factions, and democratic movements facing political suppression.Notable Members & AdvisorsThe alliance boasts a diverse international roster. Its Advisory Council has featured prominent left-wing figures such as linguist Noam Chomsky, author Naomi Klein, Indian writer Arundhati Roy, and former progressive world leaders like Rafael Correa (Ecuador).Its institutional membership includes organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Guatemala's ruling Movimiento Semilla, and prominent global labor unions like the Telangana Gig and Platform Workers Union in India.
More MAGA intellectual and moral cowardice from Anonymous, as expected.
His fearful enlarged amygdala has chosen flight over fight.
Cowardice all the way.
Your country has come to fascist dictatorship under the thumb of a criminal and admitted sex offender.
Lulu has no idea what communism is. She's a mindless parrot who can't cite a single elected Democrat espousing communism.
Better flee, little one. You don't fit in at the adult table.
OK, google.
Was the Nazi Party under Adolf Hitler socialist and pro worker?
Google response...
No, the Nazi party under Adolf Hitler was not socialist, nor was it truly pro-worker. The consensus among professional historians is that the term "National Socialist" was a deliberate propaganda tool designed to draw German workers away from actual Marxist socialism and trade unions.
Once in power, Hitler’s regime systematically dismantled worker rights and operated an economy that directly benefited major private corporations.🛑
Means?
There is NO LIE cretins like Qtard will not use to support fascism. Like... comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin.
Gemini: USAID funding cuts by the U.S. government have led to an estimated 700,000 deaths globally since early 2025.
But that's just peanuts to the fascists Qtard defends with his moronity.
Seems brainless anymouse @ 2:04 PM is the mindless shithead.
What's wrong anymouse, you can't formulate a cogent statement explaining why you feel Dave is wrong?
Understandable given the fact he is absolutely correct.
Looks like Qtard has nothing to say. I'll assume he is silently agreeing with what I wrote.
Qtard: And they NOT improve their bots... with using AI, to blend with local audience.
Why? And who is paying? Deploying bots is not free. I bet you can't explain.
Hmm. Looks like Qtard is silently agreeing with my last comment. I'll assume he is too embarrassed to reply.
)))))))
Professor Prophet Dervish Z. SandersSeptember 3, 2026 at 4:13 PM
OK, google.
//Was the Nazi Party under Adolf Hitler socialist and pro worker?
Of course.
Because.
There is NO LIE commies will not use to take power. (like... calling oneself Democrats, just like Pol Pot)
That was your claim all the way -- that said Democrats, Progressives, Socialists, Communists or whatever they decided to call oneself are all as one a self-sacrificing do-gooders. %^P
Whose inly purpose in life -- making life of OTHERS better and easier. ;-p
Not mine.))))))
\\The consensus among professional historians is that the term "National Socialist" was a deliberate propaganda tool designed to draw German workers away from actual Marxist socialism and trade unions.
Like one in Soviet Union? ;-p
THERE was "actual Marxist socialism and trade unions"? )))
Or, maybe... in Mao's China? ;-p
//There is NO LIE cretins like Qtard will not use to support fascism. Like... comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin.
Yo, cretin. ;-p
You forgot Hitler. ))))
But... I understand your problem very well -- even to your cretinic brain it would be toom cringy -- to blame me for "supporting fascism"... with admitting me rediculing and placing Hitler in one busket with Mao, Stalin and Pik Pot. ;-p
So, even though you... itself, in this same very post got scorning me for calling him socialist. ;-p
In the end -- you "forgot" to mention him in last sentence "comparing Democrats to Pol Pot and Stalin." )))))
You thought I will NOT notice that? ;-p
Because -- you are cretin? )))
Post a Comment