Shame me once, shame on me. Shame me twice, shame on you!
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”
–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
31 comments:
Once Again the Lefties prove that they have the same Memories as a Goldfish
The Demented LEFT Marxists LIE like normal people BREATHE.
As The Leftie, Progressives, and Socialist Democrats Are Now Claiming That They Never Associated Trump with Hitler! And as we ALL know that they did it constantly for the past 8 years.
Did they already think that we forget the Swastikas on Teslas?
Theres a Creep on these very boards who Calls Trunp “Hitler” in every post he makes, as the Puppy Idiot who follows him around everywhere. The two pf them call the President the mosy digsusting terms ever heard. But never, RVER call ANY of the disgusting Democrats any thing at all Not even about the Idiots that were President, and Vice President for the previous 4 years. Not One word about the Demented One and his Laughing Hyena side kick Dumb. And Dumber!.
Is is a difference between calling Trump and his supperters “MAGA, and calling them
Fascist and Nazis.
Rightturds believe they have discovered their superpower... just say White Supremacy ISN'T White Supremacy and that they are the ones being discriminated against. And refer to their actual racism as "accusations" (accusations they claim are false).
BTW, there is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence. And guilt and innocence DO only make sense if applied to individuals. But you don't believe that. Why you keep claiming that Black people are inclined toward criminality. Being guilty only due to being Black sounds like collective guilt to me. And you definitely believe in it.
Or Somali. You insisted being criminal and being Somali are linked. Unabashed hypocrisy is another of your super powers. You think accusing the Left of what you're guilty of is a grand idea. Holding racist beliefs? That's not you, that's the Left. Believing in collective guilt? That's not you, that's the Left. Except both assertions are FALSE. The Right is racist and the right does believe in collective guilt.
You just LOVE Fraudsters that claim any criticism is "racism", dontcha?
I hate it when fraudsters claim that criticism is racism. Same as I hate it when racists claim fraud is due to race (as you do).
Gavin Newsom is attempting the nearly impossible: appealing simultaneously to the radical Islamist-Marxist-Progressive wing of the Democratic Party—whose leftist, anti-Israel, and wealth-redistribution rhetoric energizes a vocal minority—while presenting himself to the broader electorate as a caricature of the old-time centrist Democrat, a moderate pragmatist who supposedly stands for stability, tradition, and cautious governance.
Howeer his sharply divergent constituencies will define whether Gavin Newsom’s push for relevance on the national stage is seen as strategic political genius or a series of incoherent stances that leave both sides completely unimpressed, And I have not been impressed by his Greasy Hair or his Cheap looking Polyester Suits at all .And his Negative Attitude, and his Loud Criticism towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by calling him “Stupid ” and since when as ANYBODY called Newsom “Smart” if anyone at all had done so, I surely haven heard it!
The Bottem Line is that the comparison areas where Gavin Newsom’s recent rhetoric and policy comments appear closer to positions long associated with Zohran Mamdani, New York’s newest Socialist bordering on Communist’s criticism of Israel and support for progressive economic policies like wealth taxes, while Governor Gavin Newsom is an empty-headed, lying Liberal, lacking in core values, and is willing to do or say anything to please Nancy Pelosi, and grab political power for his friends, rather than doing a good job for the people of California. .
It sickens me that these Leftist Trump Hating people are as stupid as they seem to be
I have to wonder if they realize that “Hitler” actually as responsible for killing and tortured 6 million people? Are they REALLY that Ignorant Or do they just play it on the internet? If you think Trump is a fascist, you are MORE stupid beyond words. Can describe
I mean, Grade A Dumb. Retarded. Dumb and dumber er than a pack of gum.
You have absolutely no sense of perspective. I'm shocked you can remember how to breathe.
No, I claim that modern allusions to race IS the fraud.
PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!
Thank you President Trump.
Minus: No, I claim that modern allusions to race IS the fraud.
You changed your mind on this subject just today and now reject White Supremacy? Because, as per your post blog comments and posts, you did used to very much believe in White Supremacy. And were lying about your White Supremacy being "race nonessentialism". If you are now admitting you were wrong, I congratulate you on seeing the error of your ways and repudiating your prior beliefs. Though you haven't actually done any repudiating yet. Is that to come?
I reject your notion of white supremacy, that everyone that isn't a black nationalist is a white supremacist. Cuz THAT's what race non-essentialism is. Not "never speak negatively of other races". Call out the neoracist b*stards (like you)!
...especially when they are ONLY critical of the white race (in an undisguised pretense of moral objectivity in search of moral SUPERIORITY)
aka - white guilt-pride.
...and not the bigots of white guilt-pride discernment.
I don't believe that "everyone that isn't a black nationalist is a white supremacist". That's dumb.
I've never criticized the White race. I don't criticize any race. I criticize individuals. You're the one that criticizes people based on their race.
And I am strongly opposed to "white guilt pride" and "neoracism". I'm opposed to all forms of racism. Unlike you, I judge people individually and not based on their race.
You never criticize the "individual" Open Border idiots in your own party. You criticize them based upon the group identities (D)s. Your white guilt-pride that MUST be virtue-signalled (I'm one of the non-threatening white people) prevents you from doing otherwise. When you sup with the racially aggrieved, you consume their vinegar, and call it "tasty".
I'd criticize any Democratic politician in any position of power that called for open borders or supported an open borders policy. But you can't cite any. You say Biden and Harris, but they have never voiced any support for open borders. That they have is just one of your many delusions.
I only criticize re "group identities" when the group is one someone can CHOOSE to belong to. People can't chose the race they are born. They CAN choose (like you have) White Supremacy. I have zero "white guilt pride" and therefore have never signaled it.
Minus: When you sup with the racially aggrieved, you consume their vinegar, and call it "tasty".
Absolutely. You do DO this. donald trump ran on a platform of White grievance. You loved it and still are loving it (insisting white grievance vinegar is tasty).
btw, I did watch the video you linked to. And I did discern that "Shanoosy" is a bigot. *yawn*
btw, grooming gangs are a real problem and they need to be dealt with harshly. But that doesn't mean blaming an entire immigrant community. That's the bigotry. You lump ALL people with the same ethnicity/religion into one group and blame them all for what a few of them do. You do the same thing with Somali immigrants.
You name the Democrat who has endorsed open borders and I'll call them an idiot. Because a country can't exist with open borders. If someone says the united states or any country should have open borders, that means they are very stupid.
LOL! "voiced support for Open borders."
Old Italian saying: "Alexander never did what he said, and Caesar never said what he did."
Acta non verba, Derv.
ps - white supremacists signal white pride, Derv. That's not guilt-pride. Guilt is signaled in the denunciation of white supremacy. You know, that thing you say you have none of... but acta non verba.
pps Find any fault in the following statement?: - "Viva la raza!" - Eddie Guerrero
Didn't think so.
Minus: Old Italian saying: "Alexander never did what he said, and Caesar never said what he did." Acta non verba, Derv.
Imaginary acta doesn't count. You say "this act proves support for open borders" and point to [I'm not sure]. A reasonable border policy under which people ARE deported, they just are done so following the law? Is that what goes in the "I'm not sure" box? That's your acta? Piss off.
Minus: Guilt is signaled in the denunciation of white supremacy...
The guilt of White Supremacists, not any guilt Democrats have.
Minus: pps Find any fault in the following statement?: - "Viva la raza!" - Eddie Guerrero. Didn't think so.
Why should I? I don't like wrestling and don't watch it. If a wrestler has a catch phrase, it doesn't bother me because I don't watch it. I also have/had no problem with "can you smell what the Rock is cooking". I just don't care.
The very fact that white supremacy is a topic at all is a testament to the guilt of Democrats.
So if a wrestler adopted a KKK personae and hood, you'd be fine with it. Good to know.
...or would your guilty conscience object to such a wrestler?
"Israeli" - One who wrestles with G_d.
It would appear that professional wrestling and professional politics are the same sport...
A heel in professional wrestling is a villainous, rule-breaking persona designed to act as an antagonist to the hero (babyface), drawing "heat" or boos from the crowd. They utilize dirty tactics, arrogance, and cowardice to anger fans. Common types include the egotistical, monster, or foreign heel
Boo, Trump! Booooooo!
No wonder so many members from Trump's cabinet came out of the professional wrestling and MMA worlds...
Donald Trump has a long-standing, deep connection to professional wrestling, highlighted by his status as a 2013 WWE Hall of Famer. He hosted WrestleMania IV and V at Trump Plaza and headlined the "Battle of the Billionaires" at WrestleMania 23 in 2007, where he shaved Vince McMahon's head. Trump famously uses "kayfabe"—the blurring of fiction and reality—in his political career
In wrestling, the outcome is determined as a result of the actas, and not the verbas.
Trump has a lot of fans...
Kayfabe is the longstanding, albeit evolving, professional wrestling tradition of presenting staged, scripted, and choreographed matches and storylines as genuine, authentic, and real. Originating from carny jargon to protect the business, it requires performers to stay in character at all times, fostering a shared illusion with the audience.
Origin and Usage
Definition: Derived as code for "be fake" or "keep cave" (be careful), it is the tacit agreement to treat the spectacle as real.
Evolution: Historically, wrestlers would never break character in public, even while traveling or eating, to maintain the illusion.
Modern Era: Following Vince McMahon’s 1997 admission that wrestling is entertainment, "kayfabe" has evolved into "neokayfabe," which mixes reality with fiction, often blurring the lines online and in interviews.
Types and Examples
Hard Kayfabe: Strict, 24/7 adherence to character (e.g., The Undertaker in the 1990s).
Soft/Breaking Kayfabe: Acknowledging the fiction, often used in storylines (e.g., the "Montreal Screwjob").
Social Media Kayfabe: Performers using platforms to perpetuate rivalries, such as "faces" (heroes) and "heels" (villains) not interacting.
Ethical Considerations
The "Mask": It forces performers to hide their true selves and struggles to protect the "mask" or persona.
Safety and Trust: While it enhances the show, it can create unrealistic expectations of pain tolerance and secrecy, often blurring the lines between fiction and dangerous reality.
Modern kayfabe acts more as a "suspension of disbelief" rather than an outright lie, allowing fans to enjoy the "story" while knowing it is produced.
But hey, you take it seriously. What a dupe!
You're a "marK", Derv.
It's ALL kayfabe now
Minus: The very fact that white supremacy is a topic at all is a testament to the guilt of Democrats.
It's a testament to the guilt of White Supremacists. Many of who are trump supporters. This would be a group that includes you. Your objection is Democrats pointing this out.
Minus: So if a wrestler adopted a KKK personae and hood, you'd be fine with it. Good to know.
Being a member of the KKK and being a proud Hispanic person isn't analogous.
Minus: ...or would your guilty conscience object to such a wrestler?
I wouldn't know that I would care. I think the fans themselves might object, due to it being in bad taste, even if performative. It might be able to work, given that professional wrestling is fake and a performance. And if the "good guy" regularly gave the KKK wrestler a serious beat down. I don't know or really care that much.
Minus: But hey, you take it seriously. What a dupe!
I don't. It's fake. I don't know where you got the idea that I did. Seems to be yet another of your delusions.
What's fake is your hypocritical pretense at moral supremacy for chastizing white supremacy (as a white person), but no other forms of both verbal or actual deeds of racial supremacy (viva la raza!)
Post a Comment