The Motives for ALL Criticism, Legitimate or Not, made by an Out-Group Speaker (Even if based upon a Universal/ Race Non-Essentialist principle) has been Weaponized and Must Subsequently be Perceived/ Heard by Members of the In-Group with Weaponized Motives Assigned to the Speaker as Subjective Racism (or Anti-Semitism). No Caritas is Granted the Speaker's Motives. He is an Outsider who Seeks the Group's Destruction, so I must constantly assert my "right to exist".
The In-Group has a tin ear when it comes to Receiving, Let Alone Accepting, Out-Group Criticism. The motives of Critics Have been POLITICALLY Weaponized, and can no longer accepted as Objective Criticism. They Must ALWAYS be Subjective Criticism. The Universal human, and the position of Universalism/ Universal Principle itself, is Denied. The Nazi (Schmittian) Us-Them/ Friend-Enemy Distinction is ALWAYS in Force.
You Cannot Eradicate Racism from a Society when Many of its' Minority Sub-Group Members hold it as a 1st Principle. Anti-Racism Pogroms Against Specific Subgroups is Not a Viable Strategy. Amor Caritas Is the Only Option.
Augustus St. Gaudens, "Amor Caritas" (1898)
5 comments:
maga = Odium crudelitas.
Meden agan!
Translation: tibi, non mihi.
No, its' meden agan. Which includes "progress" towards the eschaton.
Classical liberalism, not libertinism.
Post a Comment