Wikipedia: Mangione showed a skeptical attitude toward both Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Multiple sources have reported that he followed Democratic representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and others. These sources labeled him as politically uncategorized and "anti-system". Time magazine said it could not discern whether his political views were left- or right-wing. The Spectator wrote that his worldview "wasn't pinned to a standard left-right axis". Jacobin stated he held "a hodgepodge of views and political beliefs that don't neatly map onto any one category on the political spectrum". Maryland's state voter records indicate that Mangione is registered as having no party affiliation.🛑
Understand what “globalize the intifada” means and learn what that means from the group of people who fall victim to “intifadas”, not the people who wanna promote it and twist what it means just like you shouldn’t ask a r&pist to define what they feel it means to r&pe and then silence the victims. If you have spent the last 2 plus years listening to, following, reposting, liking, lifting up the algorithm of people who support or help sanitize the phrase “globalizing the intifada” or people who have worked with people who wanna “globalize the intifada” - you don’t get to act shocked when terror against Jews happen. If you have spent the last 2 plus years supporting and sending money to politicians who either use this phrase themselves, collaborate and platform people who use this phrase, or will jump through hoops of fire to do everything to not condemn that phrase, you don’t get to act shocked when terror against Jews happen. You are unknowingly contributing to violence by doing the above. Especially if when your reaction is to shut down the Jews in your life that reach out to you and say that certain behavior is harmful to us. No, you don’t get to act surprised when terror against Jews happen. If you really want to help, then understand and reflect. Because death should not have to be knocking at our doors for u to actually care…and this WILL continue to escalate which I’ve been warning well before October 7th.
No, the article you linked to is not proof the 2020 election was stolen.
🤖Via Copilot...
✅What the Federalist article claims.
Fulton County officials acknowledged that around 315,000 early votes from 2020 were missing required poll‑worker signatures on tabulator tapes.
The Federalist frames this as meaning the votes were “illegally certified” or “uncertified” by definition.
But this is the Federalist’s interpretation, not the conclusion of Georgia election authorities.
🥸This trump supporter (and trump supporters in general) don't care about whether or not the votes were fraudulent or not, I think. Their argument is that the proper procedure was not followed and therefore the ballots should have not been counted.
🤖You’re putting your finger on something very real — and something that shows up again and again in disputes about elections, rules, and legitimacy. Let me unpack it in a way that’s grounded, factual, and doesn’t take a position on any political figure.
🧩 Two different logics are at play.
When people argue about elections, they often operate from two entirely different frameworks:
✅What your Trump‑supporting acquaintance is doing.
They’re using Procedure Logic.
> “If the rules weren’t followed exactly, the ballots should not count.”
This argument does **not** require any claim of fraud. It’s a claim about **technical compliance**, not voter legitimacy.
And you’re right that some people lean heavily on this logic.
➡️ What election law actually says.
Across states — including Georgia — the law generally distinguishes between:
✅Voter errors. e.g., wrong ID, ineligible voter.
→ *Ballot can be rejected.*
✅Administrative errors. e.g., a poll worker forgot a signature.
→ *Ballot is still valid.*
This is because the law is designed to protect voters from being disenfranchised due to **someone else’s mistake**.
Georgia officials have repeatedly stated that: missing poll‑worker signatures, missing initials, incomplete forms, …are **procedural violations**, not grounds to throw out legally cast ballots.
This is why the fact‑check sources in your earlier search results emphasized that the 315,000 ballots were **not fraudulent** and **not invalid** — they were simply missing a poll‑worker signature on a tabulator tape.
✅Why some people still argue they should be thrown out.
This is where the emotional logic comes in.
For some people, the idea is:
> “If the rules weren’t followed, the result is tainted.”
It’s a purity‑of-process argument. It doesn’t require fraud. It doesn’t require bad intent. It only requires a procedural flaw.
But legally, that’s not how elections work. If a poll worker forgets to sign a form, the law does **not** punish the voter. 🛑
You're confused. Luigi Mangione is not a saint, even if YOU want him to be. He will go to prison for the rest of his life or be executed.
🤖Nothing in the search results suggests that mainstream left‑leaning groups, politicians, or commentators view Luigi Mangione as a saint, a hero, or a political figure to admire. The “saint” language comes from a very small, very online subculture, not from “the Left” as a whole.🛑
🥸Aside from what he did being morally wrong, it was also counterproductive. Healthcare companies aren't rushing to approve more claims and save lives of people instead of placing their focus on making bigly profits. The end result of Luigi's stupidity was that Healthcare CEOs will spend more on security and be more cautious. This makes Luigi an idiot, not a saint. Not that I think he cared about other people in his situation. What he did was about personal grievance, not justice for people similarly wronged.
I don't know any "Derpish" who is crooked. Are you calling yourself "Derpish" now? You do support the most crooked president in history. And you definitely are a derp. Given this, my conclusion is that you're talking to yourself.
9 comments:
Minus: Democrats in the John Brown Tradition.
🐂💩
Luigi Mangione is not a Democrat.
Wikipedia: Mangione showed a skeptical attitude toward both Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Multiple sources have reported that he followed Democratic representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and others. These sources labeled him as politically uncategorized and "anti-system". Time magazine said it could not discern whether his political views were left- or right-wing. The Spectator wrote that his worldview "wasn't pinned to a standard left-right axis". Jacobin stated he held "a hodgepodge of views and political beliefs that don't neatly map onto any one category on the political spectrum". Maryland's state voter records indicate that Mangione is registered as having no party affiliation.🛑
Then why is he a "saint"?
btw - Proof 2020 actually WAS stolen.
Understand what “globalize the intifada” means and learn what that means from the group of people who fall victim to “intifadas”, not the people who wanna promote it and twist what it means just like you shouldn’t ask a r&pist to define what they feel it means to r&pe and then silence the victims.
If you have spent the last 2 plus years listening to, following, reposting, liking, lifting up the algorithm of people who support or help sanitize the phrase “globalizing the intifada” or people who have worked with people who wanna “globalize the intifada” - you don’t get to act shocked when terror against Jews happen.
If you have spent the last 2 plus years supporting and sending money to politicians who either use this phrase themselves, collaborate and platform people who use this phrase, or will jump through hoops of fire to do everything to not condemn that phrase, you don’t get to act shocked when terror against Jews happen.
You are unknowingly contributing to violence by doing the above. Especially if when your reaction is to shut down the Jews in your life that reach out to you and say that certain behavior is harmful to us. No, you don’t get to act surprised when terror against Jews happen.
If you really want to help, then understand and reflect. Because death should not have to be knocking at our doors for u to actually care…and this WILL continue to escalate which I’ve been warning well before October 7th.
PS Luigi Mangione IS a Democrat.!
Ignorance and delusion on steriods.
More delusion and ignorance from the MAGAt crowd of nitwits.
Minus: Proof 2020 actually WAS stolen.
No, the article you linked to is not proof the 2020 election was stolen.
🤖Via Copilot...
✅What the Federalist article claims.
Fulton County officials acknowledged that around 315,000 early votes from 2020 were missing required poll‑worker signatures on tabulator tapes.
The Federalist frames this as meaning the votes were “illegally certified” or “uncertified” by definition.
But this is the Federalist’s interpretation, not the conclusion of Georgia election authorities.
🥸This trump supporter (and trump supporters in general) don't care about whether or not the votes were fraudulent or not, I think. Their argument is that the proper procedure was not followed and therefore the ballots should have not been counted.
🤖You’re putting your finger on something very real — and something that shows up again and again in disputes about elections, rules, and legitimacy. Let me unpack it in a way that’s grounded, factual, and doesn’t take a position on any political figure.
🧩 Two different logics are at play.
When people argue about elections, they often operate from two entirely different frameworks:
✅1. Fraud Logic.
This asks:
“Were the votes themselves illegitimate?”
Meaning: fake voters, illegal ballots, double voting, dead voters, forged signatures...
This is about the content of the votes.
✅2. Procedure Logic.
This asks: “Were the rules followed perfectly?”
Meaning: missing signatures, wrong envelopes, late paperwork, clerical errors, misfiled forms, incomplete documentation.
This is about the process, not the ballots.
You’re describing the second one.
✅What your Trump‑supporting acquaintance is doing.
They’re using Procedure Logic.
> “If the rules weren’t followed exactly, the ballots should not count.”
This argument does **not** require any claim of fraud. It’s a claim about **technical compliance**, not voter legitimacy.
And you’re right that some people lean heavily on this logic.
➡️ What election law actually says.
Across states — including Georgia — the law generally distinguishes between:
✅Voter errors. e.g., wrong ID, ineligible voter.
→ *Ballot can be rejected.*
✅Administrative errors. e.g., a poll worker forgot a signature.
→ *Ballot is still valid.*
This is because the law is designed to protect voters from being disenfranchised due to **someone else’s mistake**.
Georgia officials have repeatedly stated that: missing poll‑worker signatures, missing initials, incomplete forms, …are **procedural violations**, not grounds to throw out legally cast ballots.
This is why the fact‑check sources in your earlier search results emphasized that the 315,000 ballots were **not fraudulent** and **not invalid** — they were simply missing a poll‑worker signature on a tabulator tape.
✅Why some people still argue they should be thrown out.
This is where the emotional logic comes in.
For some people, the idea is:
> “If the rules weren’t followed, the result is tainted.”
It’s a purity‑of-process argument. It doesn’t require fraud. It doesn’t require bad intent. It only requires a procedural flaw.
But legally, that’s not how elections work. If a poll worker forgets to sign a form, the law does **not** punish the voter. 🛑
Minus: Then why is he a "saint"?
You're confused. Luigi Mangione is not a saint, even if YOU want him to be. He will go to prison for the rest of his life or be executed.
🤖Nothing in the search results suggests that mainstream left‑leaning groups, politicians, or commentators view Luigi Mangione as a saint, a hero, or a political figure to admire. The “saint” language comes from a very small, very online subculture, not from “the Left” as a whole.🛑
🥸Aside from what he did being morally wrong, it was also counterproductive. Healthcare companies aren't rushing to approve more claims and save lives of people instead of placing their focus on making bigly profits. The end result of Luigi's stupidity was that Healthcare CEOs will spend more on security and be more cautious. This makes Luigi an idiot, not a saint. Not that I think he cared about other people in his situation. What he did was about personal grievance, not justice for people similarly wronged.
FYI, The Turd Charlie Kirk is the first maga saint. And, yes, he was a Turd.
You keep describing your own crooked self, Derpish.
I don't know any "Derpish" who is crooked. Are you calling yourself "Derpish" now? You do support the most crooked president in history. And you definitely are a derp. Given this, my conclusion is that you're talking to yourself.
Post a Comment