Does regret over granting a priori consent constitute rape, too? FOMO consent is still consent.
And every sexual pass might be interpretted as sexual harassment or rape, but usually only when supplemented by the immediacy in the aposteriori official report of the allegation with the governing authorities. Else, it should be ignored as "post-walk of shame" regret if the reporting delay exceeds 24 hours.
He was convincted by testimony from 2 women concerning events that occurred approximately 20 years ago. Doesn't that (as per your prior comment) mean whatever they said "should be ignored"? Those are your words.
They say he drugged them. How can someone "regret" getting drugged without their knowledge? Is drugging someone a "pass"? Since it wasn't immediately reported, was the drugging consensual? I think that is what Bill Cosby argued.
So they're surer today than they were at the time? They've re-gained "memory"? Remarkable. I always thought that scientist believed that memories deteriorated over time and became LESS reliable. :(
Asking yourself? Why not answer yourself? Though I think "facts is a lie"... that definitely sounds like something you'd say. Given that it's what you believe. And it is also grammatically incorrect.
26 comments:
How much tinfoil does Tim Pool have wrapped around his head underneath that knit cap? Isn't he concerned about being accused of rape himself?
You never seduced a woman. That explains it!
No, I have never raped anyone. Or "seduced", as you call it.
@@
Basement genius...
Does Qtard also call rape "seducing"?
Does regret over granting a priori consent constitute rape, too? FOMO consent is still consent.
And every sexual pass might be interpretted as sexual harassment or rape, but usually only when supplemented by the immediacy in the aposteriori official report of the allegation with the governing authorities. Else, it should be ignored as "post-walk of shame" regret if the reporting delay exceeds 24 hours.
So, Danny Masterson was wrongly convincted?
How should I know, I wasn't on the jury.
He was convincted by testimony from 2 women concerning events that occurred approximately 20 years ago. Doesn't that (as per your prior comment) mean whatever they said "should be ignored"? Those are your words.
Yep. They're definitely liars suffering from "walk-of-Shame regret."
They say he drugged them. How can someone "regret" getting drugged without their knowledge? Is drugging someone a "pass"? Since it wasn't immediately reported, was the drugging consensual? I think that is what Bill Cosby argued.
So they're surer today than they were at the time? They've re-gained "memory"? Remarkable. I always thought that scientist believed that memories deteriorated over time and became LESS reliable. :(
If I truly believed that someone was drugging people and raping them, I'd report the conduct immediately, not 20 years later.
Judicial practices was different... in that times.
And probably some new methods, some new tests was developed.
Or... that is what your police serials suggest. ;-P
Judicial practices was different... in that times.
Yeah, they actually worked. Not like now.
Minus: ...memories deteriorated over time and became LESS reliable.
That's probably it -- they forgot they weren't drugged and raped. Now an "innocent" man is going to prison for 30 years.
And Danny Masterson isn't a anti-vaxx anti-Biden tRumpturd (like Russell Brand). So what explains the "false" charges?
Derpy is so scared that his DEMN Pelosi shitting on em, DEMN-junkies like De-Ru-Pi? ;-P
Suits em well. :-)))
Lie.
Facts is a lie... for Derpy.
thank you for confirming, derp. ;-P
Talking about your alter ego, "Derpy".
:-)))))))
My little derp, derping as ever.
What a merry sight to behold.
Answer is obviously yes. I'll butt out.
That's about "Facts is a lie... for Derpy."??? ;-P
Asking yourself? Why not answer yourself? Though I think "facts is a lie"... that definitely sounds like something you'd say. Given that it's what you believe. And it is also grammatically incorrect.
No end of derping. :-)))
Post a Comment