The FBI had Zero Interest in Identifying and/ or Questioning This Man after Jan 6. Why?
Inspector Gregory: "Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?"
Holmes: "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time."
Gregory: "The dog did nothing in the night-time."
Holmes: "That was the curious incident," remarked Sherlock Holmes.
-Sit Arthur Conan Doyle, "The Adventure of Silver Blaze (1892)
from Google AI - Key Takeaways:Context: A prize racehorse (Silver Blaze) was stolen and its trainer killed. The dog at the stable did not bark during the incident.
Deduction: Holmes recognized that the absence of a sound (the barking) was more significant than the presence of one.
Significance: The dog's silence meant it recognized the thief, revealing that the culprit was someone familiar to the household.
4 comments:
"The FBI had Zero Interest in Identifying and/ or Questioning This Man after Jan 6. Why?"
That is good question. Why isn't Kash Patel following up on this. He must be in on the cover up, yes?
The Institutionalist (Bureaucrats) Continue Circling the Wagons.... and Patel isn't strong enough (personality wise) to break them.
He must not have read Machiavelli. "It's better to be Feared than Loved!"
If everyone on donald trump's side is too weak to hold anyone accountable, how is he possibly going to accomplish the fantastic things your delusions tell you he is trying to accomplish? Your vision for the future is unrealizable. Nobody in power is fighting for it. Maybe if trump dies and peter Thiel's puppet JD Vance becomes president? But you said you don't want that. It makes no sense at all. What you think could happen has zero chance of happening under donald trump.
Post a Comment