Monday, January 26, 2026

Democrats and the 'Truman National Security Project'

How the USIC Politically Weaponized Government after 9/11 to ensure "Continuity of Government" using the Whole of Society Approach (Perfected Promoting Colour Revolutions in Post-Soviet States)

from Google AI:
The Truman National Security Project (TNSP) is a Washington, D.C.-based, left-leaning leadership institute and advocacy organization that recruits, trains, and positions a diverse generation of progressive leaders to shape American national security policy. Founded in 2005, it focuses on promoting active U.S. global leadership, defense, and diplomacy. 
Key details about the organization include: 
Mission: To develop "smart" national security solutions that enhance American influence, security, and prosperity.
Membership: Comprised of over 1,600-2,000 members, including military veterans, frontline civilians, policy experts, and political professionals.
Activities: Offers training, such as the "Truman National Security Bootcamps," and works with government officials on issues like climate change, immigration, and nuclear security.
Structure: It operates as a 501(c)(4) non-profit, often working alongside its sister organization, the Truman Center for National Policy, which is a 501(c)(3) think tank.
Focus Areas: Promotes a foreign policy rooted in democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

Gee, I wonder who's running Anti-ICE protests and demonstrations in Minneapolis today.... 

...for Trumpism IS a form of Domestic Terror Operation disrupting 'Continuity of Neoliberal Global Government'

11 comments:

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

FrameGame is a White Supremacist tinfoil hat nutter. Video not watched. Not because I want to stay ignorant. I know all about how nutty framegame is.

Joe Conservative said...

Not a WABC 77 fan?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

If WABC 77 invites on conspiracy theory nutters like FrameGame and allows them to lie unchallenged, then, yes I am not a fan. But I don't know if you are referring to one (or both) of the videos you posted or not. Given that I didn't watch them.

Joe Conservative said...

...no, you didn't watch them. Your "narrative" gatekeepers wouldn't want you to that...

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Why not?

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

You might discover too many "alternate facts"

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

"Alternate facts" = lies you like. I've watched MANY videos you have posted, so I know from lots of experience that is what the case is. You think that the ones I skip would (by coincidence) be the ones that convinced me?

Joe Conservative said...

You think I'm trying to convince you? lol!

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Minus: You think I'm trying to convince you? lol!

Not at all. I only pointed out that your comment says the videos I don't watch would be the ones that convinced me. I can't watch them lest I be convinced. Are you laughing at your own argument? If so, I agree. Your argument *is* laughable.

Joe Conservative said...

Citing your own arguments is a confirmation of my views? Who knew?

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Minus: Citing your own arguments is a confirmation of my views? Who knew?

Nope. Citing YOUR comments is a confirmation of YOUR views.

Specifically this comment...

You might discover too many "alternate facts".

You don't remember making this comment? Are you claiming now that someone faked your ID?