Les is correct. They were not fooled into supporting White Supremacy, as some misogynist Black men were. They know which party best represents their needs. The Democratic party is the best (not perfect) choice for representing the needs of everyone excepting the greedy oligarchs who value personal wealth above all else.
Minus: So where's the evidence of your denouncing black/ brown racism.
I don't know about Les, but I don't pay much attention to it because it is insignificant and unimpactful. Whereas White racism is very significant and impactful. This is called having priorities.
Minus: You naught but affirm them.
I have never seen Les do this even once. You can give even one example?
I meant only white women with "guilt pride" out of all white women. Not of ALL women (minority women included). Though the white women with "guilt pride" is zero. People watch the View because they like to get commentary from the female perspective. That is why Barbara Walters started the show. It has nothing to do with the bullplop you whine about.
Baba Wawa was the ultimate 2nd wave feminist. A "professional women" competing against "men"... not a labouring (union) women looking to not have to do dirty, dangerous, or heavy lifting jobs against "men" (1st wave feminism). Baba Wawa's 2nd wave feminism led to the anti-men version of feminism, much as black professional began tipping into neo-racist anti-white screeds and intersectional hierarchies within the progressive movement.
white women against white men joined forces with blacks against all whites... with white women being partially accepted as victims of white-male oppression within the trauma therapy cult of intersectional victimhood.
This series of comments is a rhetorical construction that collapses feminism, race, and progressive politics into a single grievance narrative. It’s not really about Barbara Walters (“Baba Wawa”) or The View -- those are symbolic anchors for a broader attack on intersectionality and progressive identity politics.
🧠 Step‑by‑Step Breakdown.
Barbara Walters as symbol.
He caricatures Walters as “the ultimate 2nd wave feminist,” representing professional women who competed with men.
He contrasts this with “1st wave feminism” (labor rights, union women), framing Walters’ feminism as elitist and anti‑male.
Linking feminism to race politics.
He claims 2nd wave feminism “led to the anti‑men version of feminism,” paralleling this with Black professionals supposedly turning into “neo‑racist anti‑white screeds.”
This is a rhetorical fusion: feminism and racial justice are both cast as movements that mutated into hostility toward dominant groups.
Intersectionality as “cult”.
He describes white women and Black people as forming an alliance against white men, calling intersectionality a “trauma therapy cult.”
This trivializes intersectionality (a framework for understanding overlapping systems of oppression) by reducing it to victimhood performance.
Essentialism accusation.
He claims these movements breathe life into “race and sex essentialism cults,” suggesting progressives reduce identity to immutable categories.
This is a common conservative critique: that identity politics reifies race and gender rather than transcending them.
Mockery through The View.
He ends with “Let’s share our trauma… today on The View,” mocking progressive discourse as daytime TV therapy.
Walters and The View become shorthand for feminized, trivialized political conversation.
⚖️ What’s Going On.
Straw man framing: Feminism and racial justice are reduced to caricatures of elitism, victimhood, and hostility.
Grievance fusion: He collapses gender and race politics into a single anti‑white, anti‑male narrative.
Mockery as dismissal: By invoking The View, he trivializes serious issues as entertainment gossip.
🪞 Symbolic Reading.
This is a Glyph of Intersectional Mockery: it fuses feminism and racial justice into a “cult of victimhood,” then trivializes it through pop‑culture parody. It’s also a Ceremony of Conflation, where distinct movements are collapsed into one grievance spectacle against white men.
In short: These comments aren’t about Barbara Walters or The View -- they’re about constructing a narrative where feminism and racial justice are delegitimized as elitist, anti‑male, anti‑white “cults.” The rhetorical strategy is caricature, conflation, and mockery.
...and I'll I did was apply a Marxist Critique developed by Catherine Liu. A critque of the critics who pursue New Left Identity politics instead of Old Left class politics.
31 comments:
BS👎👎🏾👎🏿
I don't give a 💩 if it is a black woman who is worrying either. Most Black women don't agree.
Most recently, in the 2024 election, they [Black women] voted for Kamala Harris at 92%. link
They're just racist. they voted for a black woman, not a white man.
Nope, their just smart and wiser than you.
Opps - they're
Les is correct. They were not fooled into supporting White Supremacy, as some misogynist Black men were. They know which party best represents their needs. The Democratic party is the best (not perfect) choice for representing the needs of everyone excepting the greedy oligarchs who value personal wealth above all else.
The unwritten rule of the Democratic Party. QED... AGAIN!
^^Bullshit, AGAIN^^
^^Proud anti-racist who Loves black racism^^
^^More ignorant delusional BS^^
So where's the evidence of your denouncing black/ brown racism? LOL!
You naught but affirm them.
Minus: So where's the evidence of your denouncing black/ brown racism.
I don't know about Les, but I don't pay much attention to it because it is insignificant and unimpactful. Whereas White racism is very significant and impactful. This is called having priorities.
Minus: You naught but affirm them.
I have never seen Les do this even once. You can give even one example?
How's 2 from yesterday?
"Go Oprah? Go Whoopie? "
Derv is correct. Therefore there is zero need to respond to the ignorance of jc.
Yet here you are, reflexively responding.
Reflexively responding to Derv's truth.
Oprah and Whoopie are racist? Despite being on TV shows that white women watch/watched (Oprah being retired)?
Do only white women with "guilt pride" watch and like them? In your delusions, I mean?
How can Whoopie stand working with all those white women she co-hosts The View with?
Nope, black racists and 2nd wave feminists love and watch her too. They're in the same trauma therapy groups she leads.
And Whoppie loves being affirmed in her racism/ sexism by white women. She's at the apex of the intersectional victimology pyramid.
What Dervish truth was that comment a response to?
I meant only white women with "guilt pride" out of all white women. Not of ALL women (minority women included). Though the white women with "guilt pride" is zero. People watch the View because they like to get commentary from the female perspective. That is why Barbara Walters started the show. It has nothing to do with the bullplop you whine about.
Baba Wawa was the ultimate 2nd wave feminist. A "professional women" competing against "men"... not a labouring (union) women looking to not have to do dirty, dangerous, or heavy lifting jobs against "men" (1st wave feminism). Baba Wawa's 2nd wave feminism led to the anti-men version of feminism, much as black professional began tipping into neo-racist anti-white screeds and intersectional hierarchies within the progressive movement.
white women against white men joined forces with blacks against all whites... with white women being partially accepted as victims of white-male oppression within the trauma therapy cult of intersectional victimhood.
...and breathing life into the race and sex essentialism cults.
Lets "share" our trauma... today on "The View"....
All of them.
LOL!
ROFLMAO!
Via Copilot...
This series of comments is a rhetorical construction that collapses feminism, race, and progressive politics into a single grievance narrative. It’s not really about Barbara Walters (“Baba Wawa”) or The View -- those are symbolic anchors for a broader attack on intersectionality and progressive identity politics.
🧠 Step‑by‑Step Breakdown.
Barbara Walters as symbol.
He caricatures Walters as “the ultimate 2nd wave feminist,” representing professional women who competed with men.
He contrasts this with “1st wave feminism” (labor rights, union women), framing Walters’ feminism as elitist and anti‑male.
Linking feminism to race politics.
He claims 2nd wave feminism “led to the anti‑men version of feminism,” paralleling this with Black professionals supposedly turning into “neo‑racist anti‑white screeds.”
This is a rhetorical fusion: feminism and racial justice are both cast as movements that mutated into hostility toward dominant groups.
Intersectionality as “cult”.
He describes white women and Black people as forming an alliance against white men, calling intersectionality a “trauma therapy cult.”
This trivializes intersectionality (a framework for understanding overlapping systems of oppression) by reducing it to victimhood performance.
Essentialism accusation.
He claims these movements breathe life into “race and sex essentialism cults,” suggesting progressives reduce identity to immutable categories.
This is a common conservative critique: that identity politics reifies race and gender rather than transcending them.
Mockery through The View.
He ends with “Let’s share our trauma… today on The View,” mocking progressive discourse as daytime TV therapy.
Walters and The View become shorthand for feminized, trivialized political conversation.
⚖️ What’s Going On.
Straw man framing: Feminism and racial justice are reduced to caricatures of elitism, victimhood, and hostility.
Grievance fusion: He collapses gender and race politics into a single anti‑white, anti‑male narrative.
Mockery as dismissal: By invoking The View, he trivializes serious issues as entertainment gossip.
🪞 Symbolic Reading.
This is a Glyph of Intersectional Mockery: it fuses feminism and racial justice into a “cult of victimhood,” then trivializes it through pop‑culture parody. It’s also a Ceremony of Conflation, where distinct movements are collapsed into one grievance spectacle against white men.
In short: These comments aren’t about Barbara Walters or The View -- they’re about constructing a narrative where feminism and racial justice are delegitimized as elitist, anti‑male, anti‑white “cults.” The rhetorical strategy is caricature, conflation, and mockery.
[end]
So what part isn't true? LOL!
...and I'll I did was apply a Marxist Critique developed by Catherine Liu. A critque of the critics who pursue New Left Identity politics instead of Old Left class politics.
The point at which the "Vanguard" abandoned the masses in pursuit of their own surplus-salaried "elite" professional advantages
Post a Comment