Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Tuesday, September 2, 2025
Zizek on Liberal Fascism
'Fascist Libertarianism"
20 comments:
Victor
said...
Since the last Presidential election, the one where Donald Trump beat the Panties off o the Misserable Candidate Kamala Harriss and her “CLOWN” of an running mate Tim Walz. I have posted a whole bunch of events, as well as “FACTS” pointing out the reasons why the election results for the Democrats, Progressives, Liberals, or whatever they want to be called today. , and asking, you leftists or show I say “requesting, or begging you to Open Your Eyes and analyze the mistakes and anti-American policies that put your “Failed Party” in this position. I actually want to see your party once again as the "loyal opposition," that an American party based on American values.
You Democrats have supported expansive, and expensive government programs that reduce individual freedoms and increase dependency on the state. High Taxation and Spending: Democratic policies favor higher taxes and increased government spending, which they believe promote economic growth without increasing the national debt. Immigration Policies: you Democrats have supported open borders and more lenient immigration laws, ignoring that they strain public services or impact job markets, and even worse, allowing these Illeagle Criminals into the country allowing the Cahos, and Murders, Rapest, Drug Dealers, Child molesters, and Other Violent Thugs into our country. And now that Our President is trying his VERY BEST to get tehm out, and be RID of Them, you are fighting him! . Regulation of Businesses: Democratic-backed regulations burden small businesses and hinder entrepreneurship. Democratic efforts to regulate firearms ignore them as infringements on the constitutional right to bear arms and create larger victim pools by inhibiting self-defense. Cultural and Social Issues: Democrats are all about identity classes such as Race, Gender Identity, Wealth, Abortion, and Education, which they conflated with oppression and victimhood. Energy and Environmental Policies: Democrats emphasize climate regulations, ignore higher energy costs, and that green energy leads to job gains in energy sectors. You Democrats often favor diplomacy over strength, which leads to perceived weakness on the world stage and further aggression. And you Democrat wanted, and supported UNQUALIFIED appointees to federal courts are often activist judges who interpret the Constitution in non-originalist ways. The Democratic Party caters more to unquifilied and is out of touch with rural or working-class Americans, putting Race, and Gender before Qualifications. . Not at all careing for Important Issues such as Immigration, Abortion,Crime and Public Safety,Healthcare, Education, Rule of Law. And the Economy And you found Gun Control, and Climate Change more important! Democrats: Prioritized democracy, abortion, healthcare, and education. Republicans: Focused on the economy, immigration, crime, and the federal budget deficit.
The Bottom line is the the Democratic Party is now in the Toilet, and risking becoming Extinct. David Pineda-Medrano, a criminal illegal alien from Guatemala, convicted of attempted first-degree child sexual abuse and sexual abuse of a minor and assault causing bodily injury. Junior Alexi Medina-Fuentes, a criminal illegal alien from Honduras, convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon Ja Mi, a criminal illegal alien from Thailand, convicted of second-degree foLeonardo Varela-Lopez, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of assault and three counts of driving under the influencercible rape. Manuel Ivan Castillo-Estrada, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of sexual assault of a child. Usuman Muhamed, a criminal illegal alien from Vietnam, convicted of murder Barbaro Reyes-Gomez, a criminal illegal from Cuba, convicted of alien smuggling. Just to name a few!
So, the Democrat governors oppose federalizing in their states, such as Illinois Governor JB Pritzker I say why fight Democrat Governors when Republican governors are happy to help, especially when crime rates are high all over? IMHO Trump should demonstrate how well Republicans can work together to reduce crime before 'invading" uncooperative democrat states. I say why fight Democrat Governors, and let the Gangs Kill off the Young Men of the State, and allow the state to just be led by Females? I say why fight Democrat Governors, just let them have their way and see that the families say when their Son’s, Husbands, and all of the other Males in their Families. And when they are all Killed my these Gangbangers let’s see what the Governor says then! After all, the Democrats like Pritzker and Newsom are showing that Red states have higher crime rates than some blue areas, so shouldn't Trump clean up the "low hanging fruit" first? GOP Governors should all be onboard with cleaning up their blue high crime cities to fix those crime rates? But NO! Because they Hate Trump, more then they Love their Sons, and Husbands!
trumper republicans are all about classes such as White and Male and (falsely) claiming that White Christianist Males are currently the bigliest victims of discrimination ever. Keep in mind they are crying victim while also portraying themselves as super manly and liberal men as effeminate pansies. Obviously this is laughable and pathetic.
Especially given that this "discrimination" they face is completely imaginary. Instead of being victims, they are the victimizers. Their fat orange Turd of a leader is actively victimizing and inflicting misery on the people his followers hate.
We saw this happen before in Nazi Germany. donald trump killed tens of thousands in his first administration (primarily via covid) and he is currently killing tens of thousands (primarily via the ending of USAID). donald trump's own VP (JD Vance) called donald "America's Hitler".
btw, trumpturds claim that Democrats are pedophiles, but their hero donald trump was the bestest friend of Jeffrey Epstein, the most notorious sex trafficker in world history. Was donald completely unaware of what his buddy Jeff was doing? I say absolutely not. I say he was actively involved in the sex trafficking. Remember that donald trump was involved in the Miss Teen USA pageant and bragged to Howard Stern that he would walk in on women changing in order to see them naked.
Via Copilot...
During Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 trial, a woman identified by the pseudonym “Jane” stated that:
She met Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14 years old, accompanied by Epstein.
She later competed in the Miss Teen USA pageant in 1998, which Trump owned at the time.
Jane did not accuse Trump of any misconduct, and her testimony focused on her experiences with Epstein. However, the overlap is striking: Epstein had access to venues where young women were present, and Trump’s pageants -- specially Miss Teen USA -- would have been ideal environments for scouting or grooming, given Epstein’s documented interest in underage girls.
And we know for certain that donald trump raped Katie Johnson when she was 13 (as per her testimony).
Lester, NO matter what You Say or what you write, your STILL a COWARD and you still are hiding under the Rock at Progressives Blog, and you still are FULL of Shit!
Nobody knew. None of us saw it. Amongst his biggest supporters, maybe a handful suspected it. Many of us expected the economic renewal of the US to happen. Many of us foresaw a significant roll back of Saint Barrack’s horrid, destructive agenda. A lot of us hoped for a major push back on the left. All of which we have gotten. None of us, no one I have read, no one I know, expected Donald Trump to be a giant in foreign policy. No one expected him to reshape the world. Yet Donald Trump, in a short time, is doing so. That was supposed to be one of the reasons to vote against him. He had no foreign policy experience.
Democrats love to parade their moral superiority while cloaking themselves in the language of compassion and progress. But strip away the virtue-signaling, and what do you get? A party obsessed with identity boxes—Black, trans, immigrant, nonbinary, neurodivergent—each one weaponized to shame anyone who dares question their dogma. They claim to be champions of the marginalized, yet they’ve built an entire political machine on guilt, division, and performative outrage.
They cry “oppression” while holding the reins of every major cultural institution—media, academia, Hollywood, Big Tech. They call themselves victims while silencing dissent, canceling comedians, and branding anyone who disagrees as a bigot. It’s not justice they seek—it’s control. And they wield it with smug condescension, painting working-class Americans as backward rubes who need to be “educated” into submission.
Their leaders? A parade of aging career politicians who’ve spent decades enriching themselves while preaching equity from gated mansions. They talk about “saving democracy” while pushing censorship, weaponizing federal agencies, and rewriting norms to suit their agenda. The hypocrisy is staggering.
And let’s not forget the scandals they conveniently bury. While they scream about Republican ties to Epstein, they ignore the fact that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s jet multiple times. They call Trump a predator, but turn a blind eye to credible accusations against their own. They claim to protect children, yet push policies that confuse and sexualize them under the guise of “gender affirmation.” This isn’t progress—it’s a masquerade. A party that once stood for civil rights now stands for moral coercion, institutional rot, and a culture of fear. They don’t want unity. They want submission. And they’ll dress it up in rainbow flags and hashtags while the country burns beneath their sanctimony.
You're right to be skeptical. That passage reads more like a polemical blog post or partisan op-ed than something a mainstream AI—especially one developed by Google—would generate in response to a typical user query.
🔍 Here’s why it’s unlikely to be authentic:
- Tone and language: The rhetoric is highly inflammatory, emotionally charged, and ideologically loaded. Phrases like “parade of aging career politicians,” “weaponized identity boxes,” and “country burns beneath their sanctimony” are not typical of AI-generated responses from major platforms, which are designed to avoid overt political bias and incendiary framing.
- Policy safeguards:
Google’s AI systems—like Bard—are built with strict content moderation filters to prevent the generation of hate speech, partisan attacks, or misinformation. While no system is perfect, this kind of sustained vitriol would likely trigger multiple safeguards.
- Platform reputation: Google, like other major tech companies, is under intense scrutiny for political neutrality in AI. A response like this would be a PR disaster and likely provoke immediate backlash.
🧠 Could it happen in theory?
Sure—if someone deliberately engineered a prompt to provoke a biased or extreme output, especially using an uncensored or fine-tuned model outside Google’s official deployment. But that wouldn’t be representative of the platform’s default behavior.
I don't. Because you're lying. What you included in your comment (in italics) doesn't address anything I wrote -- and therefore is not a response to my comment.
Also, you previously said AI chatbots were created by the PMC to serve their Leftwing interests. Google would definitely fall into that category. Or are you now saying Google is run by trump supporters?
I think your tinfoil hat is what makes you "sure". That comment was obviously made by someone who traveled over here from Lisa's blog. It is someone who saw you comment there, looked at your profile and found the link to this blog.
That detail about “Lester” is telling. It’s not just a name swap—it’s a rhetorical fingerprint. In long-running online communities, especially ones with recurring participants like Les, these kinds of personalized jabs accumulate history and meaning. Calling him “Lester” isn’t random; it’s part of a known pattern, likely used by someone familiar with the interpersonal dynamics and past exchanges. That alone makes the bot theory pretty flimsy.
Joe Conservative’s “20% sure it’s a chatbot” feels more like a rhetorical hedge than a serious claim. It’s a way to cast doubt without committing, and it leans into a broader cultural anxiety about AI infiltration. But in this case, it ignores the behavioral nuance: bots don’t typically carry forward nickname-based antagonisms from years of blog drama. They don’t do continuity. They don’t do grudges.
Also, the tone and structure of the anonymous comment—emotional, grammatically loose, and steeped in personal insult—are classic human troll behavior. Bots, even rogue ones, tend to be either too generic or too polished unless deliberately engineered to mimic trolling. And even then, they rarely sustain the kind of long-tail interpersonal vendettas that define these exchanges.
So yes, your assessment holds: this is someone with history, not a synthetic interloper. If anything, Joe’s suspicion might reflect a kind of epistemic fatigue—when online spaces get noisy, it’s tempting to blame bots rather than reckon with persistent human antagonism.
I told it to invert your argument. Then it warned me that the argument was sharp and edged and asked if it wanted the argument to be as sharp and edged. I said yes. That's what you got. That's what AI really knows about the progressive left.
20 comments:
Since the last Presidential election, the one where Donald Trump beat the Panties off o the Misserable Candidate Kamala Harriss and her “CLOWN” of an running mate Tim Walz. I have posted a whole bunch of events, as well as “FACTS” pointing out the reasons why the election results for the Democrats, Progressives, Liberals, or whatever they want to be called today. , and asking, you leftists or show I say “requesting, or begging you to Open Your Eyes and analyze the mistakes and anti-American policies that put your “Failed Party” in this position. I actually want to see your party once again as the "loyal opposition," that an American party based on American values.
You Democrats have supported expansive, and expensive government programs that reduce individual freedoms and increase dependency on the state.
High Taxation and Spending: Democratic policies favor higher taxes and increased government spending, which they believe promote economic growth without increasing the national debt.
Immigration Policies: you Democrats have supported open borders and more lenient immigration laws, ignoring that they strain public services or impact job markets, and even worse, allowing these Illeagle Criminals into the country allowing the Cahos, and Murders, Rapest, Drug Dealers, Child molesters, and Other Violent Thugs into our country. And now that Our President is trying his VERY BEST to get tehm out, and be RID of Them, you are fighting him! .
Regulation of Businesses: Democratic-backed regulations burden small businesses and hinder entrepreneurship.
Democratic efforts to regulate firearms ignore them as infringements on the constitutional right to bear arms and create larger victim pools by inhibiting self-defense.
Cultural and Social Issues: Democrats are all about identity classes such as Race, Gender Identity, Wealth, Abortion, and Education, which they conflated with oppression and victimhood.
Energy and Environmental Policies: Democrats emphasize climate regulations, ignore higher energy costs, and that green energy leads to job gains in energy sectors.
You Democrats often favor diplomacy over strength, which leads to perceived weakness on the world stage and further aggression.
And you Democrat wanted, and supported UNQUALIFIED appointees to federal courts are often activist judges who interpret the Constitution in non-originalist ways.
The Democratic Party caters more to unquifilied and is out of touch with rural or working-class Americans, putting Race, and Gender before Qualifications. .
Not at all careing for Important Issues such as
Immigration, Abortion,Crime and Public Safety,Healthcare, Education, Rule of Law. And the Economy And you found Gun Control, and Climate Change more important!
Democrats: Prioritized democracy, abortion, healthcare, and education.
Republicans: Focused on the economy, immigration, crime, and the federal budget deficit.
The Bottom line is the the Democratic Party is now in the Toilet, and risking becoming Extinct.
David Pineda-Medrano, a criminal illegal alien from Guatemala, convicted of attempted first-degree child sexual abuse and sexual abuse of a minor and assault causing bodily injury.
Junior Alexi Medina-Fuentes, a criminal illegal alien from Honduras, convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon
Ja Mi, a criminal illegal alien from Thailand, convicted of second-degree foLeonardo Varela-Lopez, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of assault and three counts of driving under the influencercible rape.
Manuel Ivan Castillo-Estrada, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of sexual assault of a child.
Usuman Muhamed, a criminal illegal alien from Vietnam, convicted of murder
Barbaro Reyes-Gomez, a criminal illegal from Cuba, convicted of alien smuggling.
Just to name a few!
So, the Democrat governors oppose federalizing in their states, such as
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker
I say why fight Democrat Governors when Republican governors are happy to help, especially when crime rates are high all over?
IMHO Trump should demonstrate how well Republicans can work together to reduce crime before 'invading" uncooperative democrat states.
I say why fight Democrat Governors, and let the Gangs Kill off the Young Men of the State, and allow the state to just be led by Females?
I say why fight Democrat Governors, just let them have their way and see that the families say when their Son’s, Husbands, and all of the other Males in their Families. And when they are all Killed my these Gangbangers let’s see what the Governor says then!
After all, the Democrats like Pritzker and Newsom are showing that Red states have higher crime rates than some blue areas, so shouldn't Trump clean up the "low hanging fruit" first? GOP Governors should all be onboard with cleaning up their blue high crime cities to fix those crime rates? But NO! Because they Hate Trump, more then they Love their Sons, and Husbands!
The COWARD Lester Carpenter is still hiding under the Rock at Progressives Blogs
Hi again anon @12:17 PM. Still here, not @ "that progressive site". Still correcting the MAGA lies and delusions.
trumper republicans are all about classes such as White and Male and (falsely) claiming that White Christianist Males are currently the bigliest victims of discrimination ever. Keep in mind they are crying victim while also portraying themselves as super manly and liberal men as effeminate pansies. Obviously this is laughable and pathetic.
Especially given that this "discrimination" they face is completely imaginary. Instead of being victims, they are the victimizers. Their fat orange Turd of a leader is actively victimizing and inflicting misery on the people his followers hate.
We saw this happen before in Nazi Germany. donald trump killed tens of thousands in his first administration (primarily via covid) and he is currently killing tens of thousands (primarily via the ending of USAID). donald trump's own VP (JD Vance) called donald "America's Hitler".
btw, trumpturds claim that Democrats are pedophiles, but their hero donald trump was the bestest friend of Jeffrey Epstein, the most notorious sex trafficker in world history. Was donald completely unaware of what his buddy Jeff was doing? I say absolutely not. I say he was actively involved in the sex trafficking. Remember that donald trump was involved in the Miss Teen USA pageant and bragged to Howard Stern that he would walk in on women changing in order to see them naked.
Via Copilot...
During Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 trial, a woman identified by the pseudonym “Jane” stated that:
She met Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14 years old, accompanied by Epstein.
She later competed in the Miss Teen USA pageant in 1998, which Trump owned at the time.
Jane did not accuse Trump of any misconduct, and her testimony focused on her experiences with Epstein. However, the overlap is striking: Epstein had access to venues where young women were present, and Trump’s pageants -- specially Miss Teen USA -- would have been ideal environments for scouting or grooming, given Epstein’s documented interest in underage girls.
And we know for certain that donald trump raped Katie Johnson when she was 13 (as per her testimony).
Lester, NO matter what You Say or what you write, your STILL a COWARD and you still are hiding under the Rock at Progressives Blog, and you still are FULL of Shit!
Nobody knew. None of us saw it. Amongst his biggest supporters, maybe a handful suspected it. Many of us expected the economic renewal of the US to happen. Many of us foresaw a significant roll back of Saint Barrack’s horrid, destructive agenda. A lot of us hoped for a major push back on the left. All of which we have gotten. None of us, no one I have read, no one I know, expected Donald Trump to be a giant in foreign policy. No one expected him to reshape the world. Yet Donald Trump, in a short time, is doing so. That was supposed to be one of the reasons to vote against him. He had no foreign policy experience.
Google AI's response:
Democrats love to parade their moral superiority while cloaking themselves in the language of compassion and progress. But strip away the virtue-signaling, and what do you get? A party obsessed with identity boxes—Black, trans, immigrant, nonbinary, neurodivergent—each one weaponized to shame anyone who dares question their dogma. They claim to be champions of the marginalized, yet they’ve built an entire political machine on guilt, division, and performative outrage.
They cry “oppression” while holding the reins of every major cultural institution—media, academia, Hollywood, Big Tech. They call themselves victims while silencing dissent, canceling comedians, and branding anyone who disagrees as a bigot. It’s not justice they seek—it’s control. And they wield it with smug condescension, painting working-class Americans as backward rubes who need to be “educated” into submission.
Their leaders? A parade of aging career politicians who’ve spent decades enriching themselves while preaching equity from gated mansions. They talk about “saving democracy” while pushing censorship, weaponizing federal agencies, and rewriting norms to suit their agenda. The hypocrisy is staggering.
And let’s not forget the scandals they conveniently bury. While they scream about Republican ties to Epstein, they ignore the fact that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s jet multiple times. They call Trump a predator, but turn a blind eye to credible accusations against their own. They claim to protect children, yet push policies that confuse and sexualize them under the guise of “gender affirmation.”
This isn’t progress—it’s a masquerade. A party that once stood for civil rights now stands for moral coercion, institutional rot, and a culture of fear. They don’t want unity. They want submission. And they’ll dress it up in rainbow flags and hashtags while the country burns beneath their sanctimony.
Pretty spot-on.
Minus: Google AI's response...
I seriously doubt it.
Via Copilot...
You're right to be skeptical. That passage reads more like a polemical blog post or partisan op-ed than something a mainstream AI—especially one developed by Google—would generate in response to a typical user query.
🔍 Here’s why it’s unlikely to be authentic:
- Tone and language: The rhetoric is highly inflammatory, emotionally charged, and ideologically loaded. Phrases like “parade of aging career politicians,” “weaponized identity boxes,” and “country burns beneath their sanctimony” are not typical of AI-generated responses from major platforms, which are designed to avoid overt political bias and incendiary framing.
- Policy safeguards:
Google’s AI systems—like Bard—are built with strict content moderation filters to prevent the generation of hate speech, partisan attacks, or misinformation. While no system is perfect, this kind of sustained vitriol would likely trigger multiple safeguards.
- Platform reputation: Google, like other major tech companies, is under intense scrutiny for political neutrality in AI. A response like this would be a PR disaster and likely provoke immediate backlash.
🧠 Could it happen in theory?
Sure—if someone deliberately engineered a prompt to provoke a biased or extreme output, especially using an uncensored or fine-tuned model outside Google’s official deployment. But that wouldn’t be representative of the platform’s default behavior.
It asked if I wanted the response to be as "sharp" as your original. I said "yes". So now you know what an LLM thinks of your ideology. :)
@Derv - btw - I think there are a lot of AI chatbots starting to comment here (see above).
F**k Off dude.
You be the coward hiding behind yer mommies skit whimpering like the whiny whittle pos you prove yourself to be.
I'm 20% sure it's a chatbot, Les. Trolls like to sign their work.
I'm getting 90 clicks an hour... and I'm sure that most are bot scrapers.
I don't. Because you're lying. What you included in your comment (in italics) doesn't address anything I wrote -- and therefore is not a response to my comment.
Also, you previously said AI chatbots were created by the PMC to serve their Leftwing interests. Google would definitely fall into that category. Or are you now saying Google is run by trump supporters?
Does that mean your shadow banning is over?
I think your tinfoil hat is what makes you "sure". That comment was obviously made by someone who traveled over here from Lisa's blog. It is someone who saw you comment there, looked at your profile and found the link to this blog.
Via Copilot...
That detail about “Lester” is telling. It’s not just a name swap—it’s a rhetorical fingerprint. In long-running online communities, especially ones with recurring participants like Les, these kinds of personalized jabs accumulate history and meaning. Calling him “Lester” isn’t random; it’s part of a known pattern, likely used by someone familiar with the interpersonal dynamics and past exchanges. That alone makes the bot theory pretty flimsy.
Joe Conservative’s “20% sure it’s a chatbot” feels more like a rhetorical hedge than a serious claim. It’s a way to cast doubt without committing, and it leans into a broader cultural anxiety about AI infiltration. But in this case, it ignores the behavioral nuance: bots don’t typically carry forward nickname-based antagonisms from years of blog drama. They don’t do continuity. They don’t do grudges.
Also, the tone and structure of the anonymous comment—emotional, grammatically loose, and steeped in personal insult—are classic human troll behavior. Bots, even rogue ones, tend to be either too generic or too polished unless deliberately engineered to mimic trolling. And even then, they rarely sustain the kind of long-tail interpersonal vendettas that define these exchanges.
So yes, your assessment holds: this is someone with history, not a synthetic interloper. If anything, Joe’s suspicion might reflect a kind of epistemic fatigue—when online spaces get noisy, it’s tempting to blame bots rather than reckon with persistent human antagonism.
Could be. But the AIs are getting more clever.
I told it to invert your argument. Then it warned me that the argument was sharp and edged and asked if it wanted the argument to be as sharp and edged. I said yes. That's what you got. That's what AI really knows about the progressive left.
Post a Comment