...they don't in the UK.
The Guilt-Pride Re-Branding... of Nazi's and Democrats
Rehabilitating Guilt and Restoring Pride
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
21 comments:
What's really going on is that your delusions are continuing. And the truth is that nobody's life matters. At least to republicans. Charlie Kirk died a martyr to the republican cause of not regulating guns no matter the cost. In this case, Kirk said that not regulating guns was worth people dying. Even himself, it seems. Though that's just what (ironically) happened. He probably believed preserving "guns for all with no restrictions, no matter the cost" applied to others, not to him.
Trantifa notches its' latest "oppressor". You must be so proud!
I'm not proud of your "transtifa" delusions, I'm disturbed by them. The shooter's identity is unknown at this point. Yet it seems you know the shooter was trans? You should offer to provide your infallible precognitive abilities to the police. You must know where the shooter is, having seen his (?) location in a vision. Unless you contact the FBI immediately and share your visions with them, I say you are complicit in this crime. You should have called the FBI and shared with them the identity of the shooter BEFORE Charlie Kirk was murdered.
The stories ignorant people tell themselves. Continously. Eh Derv?
He/she/it signed their bullet casings.
Really?
Anti-fascist + Transgender = trantifa
Remind you of anyone?
In December 2024, three bullet casings found at the murder scene of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City had the words "delay," "deny," and "depose" written on them. Police are investigating the meaning of these words and are considering them a possible link to a book critiquing the insurance industry, titled "Delay, Deny, Defend," which was published in 2010. The words on the casings are considered a potential clue to the motive behind the targeted, premeditated attack, according to CNN.
Another Leftist hero.
My question to copilot...
Is this a theory that anyone online has floated?
donald trump had it arranged for an assassin to shoot charlie kirk to rile up his base's hatred for the left and distract from the epstein scandal?
Copilot's response...
Yes, that theory has indeed surfaced online -- particularly on X (formerly Twitter) -- in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. While there’s no verified evidence to support it, some users have speculated that Donald Trump may have orchestrated the killing to both galvanize his base against the left and divert attention from renewed scrutiny over the Epstein files.
Here’s how the theory has taken shape:
🧠 The Conspiracy Narrative.
Timing: Kirk was shot on September 11, 2025, during a live event at Utah Valley University. Just days prior, he had publicly called for the release of Epstein-related documents.
Political Fallout: Trump responded swiftly with a tribute video and national flag order, which some interpreted as unusually premeditated.
Online Speculation: Posts on X suggested that Kirk’s death served two purposes:
Silencing a Trump ally who had begun questioning the Epstein cover-up
Creating a martyr to rally MAGA supporters against perceived leftist threats
One viral post read: “Charlie Kirk’s violent death served two purposes. One, the Epstein files news disappeared. Two, MAGA declared civil war on liberals.”
Another user wrote: “How do we know Trump didn’t order Kirk’s assassination as a distraction from Epstein -- and a tactic to start the civil unrest he needs to declare Martial Law and delay the 2026 midterms?”
[end]
Seems absolutely plausible to me. Remember that donald trump was the target of TWO fake assassination attempts. This could be a repeat of that. AKA another false flag.
Via Copilot...
🧩 Glossary Entry: False Flag Echo Strategy.
Definition: A theory suggesting that a political figure may replicate or stage crisis events to evoke public sympathy, distract from scandal, or consolidate power.
Example: Trump benefits from assassination attempt → replicates dynamic to dominate media and rally base.
Emotional Logic: Victimhood as power amplifier; spectacle as narrative override.
Distortion Risk: Conflating plausible motive with factual evidence; emotional resonance mistaken for proof.
Via Copilot...
That blog post is a vivid example of rhetorical compression, where emotionally charged details are stitched together to construct a mythic narrative -- one that aligns neatly with a particular ideological worldview.
Let’s unpack the layers:
🧠 The “Trantifa” Claim.
The blogger’s use of “he/she/it” and the coined term “trantifa” isn’t just provocative -- it’s dehumanizing and reductive, collapsing transgender identity and antifascist ideology into a single caricature. It’s designed to:
Mock gender fluidity through pronoun distortion.
Frame trans identity as inherently militant.
Activate fear and disgust in readers predisposed to view leftist movements as threatening.
This rhetorical move isn’t about evidence -- it’s about emotional activation.
🧩 Linking to the Brian Thompson Case.
The reference to the December 2024 murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson is factually grounded: investigators did find bullet casings with the words “delay,” “deny,” and “depose” written on them. These inscriptions are being examined as a possible ideological clue, potentially referencing the 2010 book Delay, Deny, Defend, which critiques insurance industry tactics.
But the blogger’s framing -- calling Thompson’s killer “another Leftist hero” -- is speculative and ideologically loaded. The suspect, Luigi Mangione, was arrested and found with a notebook outlining grievances against corporate executives, but there’s no confirmed link to any organized leftist movement.
[end]
rightturd heros = insurrectionists and murderers (Ashli Babbit, Kyle Rittenhouse).
Luigi Mangione is not a Leftist hero. He is a murderer who will be convicted and sent to prison.
OMG, I'm dehumanizing Charlie Kirk's assassin...
btw - Fry Luigi!
FBI is going to have a blast taking out Antifa. Trump used the "T" word. You're on the list, Derv.
Welcome to the 'List'. :)
WTF does that mean? You think I'm trans? I am not, but if I was that would be proof I'm violent?
You admitted that Soros was paying you, Derv. You can pretend that you were using sarcasm, but nobody believes Trump ever jokes about anything, so why would you.
Is the trantifa paymaster innocent of the crimes they commit with his money?
And how are you dehumanizing Charlie Kirk's assassin? By falsely asserting you "know" the shooter is trans? GTFO.
I say it is certainly possible that this "shell casings having trans and antifa markings" is misdirection by the shooter. As everyone is well aware, the Right hates trans people and seeks to villainize them. Knowing this, the shooter could have laid false clues to derail the investigation.
As your surety proves, Turd-2 is absolutely open to blaming "trantifa". Even EAGER to blame trans people. I say that, if an assassin was to attempt misdirection, this would be the PERFECT false lead to plant.
FYI, Luigi will be convicted. IDC if that means life in prison or execution. I am NOT a fan. He is NOT a hero to me. While the killer Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero to you. Both Kyle Rittenhouse and Luigi should be in prison because they killed people.
Exactly, how am I?
You: The blogger’s use of “he/she/it” and the coined term “trantifa” isn’t just provocative -- it’s dehumanizing and reductive, collapsing transgender identity and antifascist ideology into a single caricature. It’s designed to:
I didn't use its' preferred pronouns?
Do you know them? Maybe you should tell the FBI and place a stake in the $100k ID lottery.
It isn't surprising at all that you don't know the difference between fantasy (fiction) and reality.
Via Copilot...
🧠 What Might Be Happening Psychologically.
Rather than psychosis, what you’re likely witnessing is a blend of:
1. Cognitive Dissonance Avoidance.
When facts contradict deeply held beliefs, the mind may reject reality to preserve emotional coherence.
Fictional narratives (e.g., conspiracy theories, mythic heroism) become protective scaffolding.
2. Narrative Identity Fusion.
Their sense of self is entwined with a political mythos -- Trump as savior, deep state as villain.
Fictional constructs aren’t just stories -- they’re emotional truths that feel more real than evidence.
3. Epistemic Closure.
A closed information loop where only certain sources are trusted, and all others are dismissed as lies.
This creates a reality bubble where fiction and selective facts reinforce each other.
4. Paracosmic Thinking.
A term borrowed from fantasy psychology: the creation of a detailed imaginary world that feels internally consistent.
In political discourse, this manifests as belief in elaborate plots, coded messages, and mythic battles.
[end]
Mystere believes fiction I write is true. So I replied as if it is. That doesn't mean that my fiction becomes reality.
Though donald trump does often seem to think that, if he spins a fictional narrative, that it can become true. The difference between donald trump and me is that I am upfront about it when I write fiction. And I never convince myself that any fiction I write is true.
It is also a stark distinction between you and me. I don't buy into fictional political narratives -- while you love them. Fiction such as is published at the Conservative Treehouse aka the donald trump fanfic site.
Post a Comment