h/t - Shaw Kenawe
btw - Rumours have it that the future Pope was also also born in a manger, then wrapped in a swaddling cloth, floated down a river, and the discovered and blessed by 3 wise jazz musicians.
The 1st Miracle: Turning White into Black
Proclaim the Word throughout the land: "Pope Leo XIV's maternal grandparents were Haitian and Creole."
Democrats can now speak a Coherent Narrative... that can purport to also represent Catholics
A New Anti-Racist Anti-Trump has ARISEN Proving Once Again that Racial Identity is DESTINY!
Say 3 Hail Mary's at the Virgen de Guadalupe, then...
Let the Secular Worshipment Begin!
Habemus Papam (D)!
47 comments:
Is he the DEI Pope?
You mean, "Is it a POLITICAL PATRONAGE appointment?" You betcha!
"In medias reads..."
from Copilot:
Steve Bannon made a surprising prediction about Pope Leo XIV's election nearly a week before the conclave. In an interview with Piers Morgan, Bannon described Cardinal Robert Prevost as a "dark horse" candidate, noting his progressive stance and strong ties to Latin America.
Bannon pointed out that Prevost was ideologically close to Pope Francis and had extensive experience in Latin America, which made him a strong contender despite being largely overlooked by analysts. He also expressed skepticism about an American pope, citing the Vatican's historical reluctance to elect one.
Despite accurately predicting Prevost's rise, Bannon was not pleased with the outcome. He later criticized Pope Leo XIV as "too progressive" and "the worst choice for MAGA Catholics", arguing that his election was an anti-Trump move by globalists within the Vatican.
Bannon in his own words.
Minus: You mean, "Is it a POLITICAL PATRONAGE appointment?" You betcha!
I get it. For you (as a White Supremacist) Leo isn't White enough. His purity is lacking. At least he presents as White. Though it's (for you) likely much worse that he aligns more closely with the ideals of Democrats. Like helping the poor (fleas). Still he is very much opposed to a woman having bodily autonomy, so there is that.
I borrowed the race topic from Shaw. I couldn't give a sh*t if he were a Martian. But it seems very important to Democrats that he has the right racial intersectionality markers. A "reason" to overlook his "abortion" and support for cisgen sexuality heresies.
ps - She won't publish any of my comments there, so...
So Leo is a blackface Pope? He won't be Pope for long.
It stands to reason then that God must be PRO DEI, PRO globalism, and ANTI tRump. How can Steve Bannon, as a Catholic himself, argue that Leo is anti-trump and then not concede that God must be anti-trump, given that the pope (as per the Catholic church, which Bannon is a member of) is God's representative on earth?
Copilot: Logically, if Bannon accepts the Catholic view that the pope is God’s representative on Earth, and if he believes Pope Leo XIV is anti-Trump, then yes -- he would have to concede that God Himself is anti-Trump within that framework. [end]
So you agree that all Democrats should be denied Communion over abortion. gtk...
Obviously. He'll be Sainted!
That was Francis' big thing, bringing back the Saints.
Minus: So you agree that all Democrats should be denied Communion over abortion.
And how would the communion givers know that a parishioner was a Democrat or in favor of bodily autonomy? There are "pro life" Democrats.
They can deny me Communion if they like. IDGAF.
Copilot: The Church tends to approach issues of personal morality on a case-by-case basis, rather than applying blanket exclusions to millions of people. [end]
I referred to one person (Steve Bannon) not millions of people.
God is anti-tRump, Mystere. It has been confirmed definitively that Donald John Trump is NOT "God's chosen leader". btw, HOW will he "not be pope for long"?
It's the higher canonical title... St. Leo XIV vs Pope Leo XIV
He saved us from the Dragon (Trump), like St. George (vs. Diocletian).
Robert Prevost = God's chosen pope.
But we are FAR from "saved".
btw, Mystere's alter ego Rattrapper has accused his other alter ego Qtardo of being a liberal. Yet more proof of this imbecile's severe mental illness.
You mean the Church doesn't believe in Social Justice (class action laws and lawsuits) I wonder why... could it be because its' not Justice? Much as racism isn't Justice?
They must be MLK, Jr "content of their character" believing people. Unlike you and your white-washing of all Democrat malfeasance..
Nah, if the Pope grants absolution you're guaranteed to be Saved. ;)
Minus: You mean the Church doesn't believe in Social Justice (class action laws and lawsuits) I wonder why... could it be because its' not Justice? Much as racism isn't Justice?
"Social Justice isn't justice" to White Supremacists.
Minus: You mean the Church doesn't believe in Social Justice (class action laws and lawsuits) I wonder why... could it be because its' not Justice? Much as racism isn't Justice?
Copilot: That comment seems to conflate two different concepts -- Catholic social teaching and the legal framework of class action lawsuits. The Catholic Church advocates for social justice in terms of dignity, human rights, and care for the poor, but it doesn't necessarily take a position on legal mechanisms like class action lawsuits. [end]
Me: does the catholic church believe in social justice?
Copilot: Yes, the Catholic Church has a strong tradition of social justice, rooted in its teachings on human dignity, solidarity, and care for the poor. Catholic social teaching emphasizes principles like the common good, preferential option for the poor, and rights and responsibilities, all of which guide Catholics in addressing issues like poverty, inequality, and human rights.
The Church believes that every person is created in the image of God and deserves respect and access to basic needs. This belief drives Catholic efforts to promote justice, advocate for fair policies, and support marginalized communities. [end]
Minus: Nah, if the Pope grants absolution you're guaranteed to be Saved. ;)
I meant in terms of the trump presidency. The pope will NOT save America from Turd-2.
FYI, Mystere now claims this blog is imaginary.
Mystere also claims that his Q-Taro comment above, "So Leo is a blackface Pope? He won't be Pope for long", is actually what I think. He wrote on his blog, "By asking if Robert Prevost is a DEI Pope, you implied Pope Leo's appointment was a Blackface movement of the archdiocese".
When I pointed out that this was HIS comment and that I strongly disagree with it -- and was implying no such thing -- he deleted my comment from his blog. Because Mystere is a very dishonest person. But trumpers, in general, are. They see what a lying Turd donald trump is, and ADMIRE that quality in him.
Copilot: ...many Trump supporters seem to appreciate his ability to bend reality to his advantage. Rather than viewing his frequent misinformation as a flaw, they see it as a skill, a kind of political showmanship that allows him to manipulate the media, opponents, and even his own base.
To them, his disregard for truth isn’t a liability -- it’s proof that he can dominate the narrative, outmaneuver his critics, and push forward his agenda regardless of the facts. It’s not about believing everything he says, but rather admiring the way he plays the game. In a way, it’s a form of cynicism: the belief that politics is inherently deceptive, and Trump is just better at it than anyone else. [end]
This definitely applies in the case of Mystere and Minus FJ. Though Mystere, in trying to attribute words HE WROTE to me, ratchets up the absurdity to a new level.
This belief drives Catholic efforts to promote justice, advocate for fair policies, and support marginalized communities. [end]
In other words, give to each their due... justice, NOT "social justice".
Suffering lies at the heart of Christianity (and Buddhism), and with Catholics it usually ends in martyrdom (Buddhists seek to relieve it). Like I've said repeatedly, I'm not a Christian OR a Buddhist. I'm a Deist. I'm "agnostic" to suffering, cuz you tend to get what you give. Again, "justice" NOT "Social justice".
..and historically ALL religions are legal systems. The only thing different about Christianity is that since the Spanish Inquisition, they've subcontracted out the criminal Courts to the State.
ps - The pope's powers to "Save" were never of this earth... although Leo I did "save" Rome from Atilla.
The cynics are the UniParty Lawfare goons like you, Derv. I'm a Kynic. I laugh when Trump makes the cynic's balls get dusty.
Those who opposed trump and tried to hold him accountable for his many wrongdoings believe in the rule of law. d0n0ld is all about retribution. He's the one currently engaging in lawfare.
That's why they had to invent new laws to prosecute him... they believe that they're the law that must be believed in. Guess what. The lawmakers and judiciary are losing credibility and integrity daily. The believers are destroying the law.
And retribution for the faux-law enforcers is coming.
Minus: And retribution for the faux-law enforcers is coming.
Impeachment, conviction and removal? What about all the other Turd-2 faux-law enforcers? If there is any accountability for them I think it's a long way off.
"invent new laws to prosecute him" = in your delusions. I'm not aware that any "prosecute donald trump" laws were passed by congress and signed into law by Joe Biden. Can you cite them?
"The believers are destroying the law".
BS. donald trump isn't a believer in any law applying to him.
The judges? Definitely.
Dervish is hurting because he got spanked badly.
Mystere aka Rattrapper aka Qtaro is hurting because he got spanked badly. This would be in regards to him trying to blame me for HIS "blackface pope" comment. Everyone can see that YOU made the comment, idiot.
Minus: The judges? Definitely.
Judges will NOT be impeached and removed for standing up for the Constitution. That's another of your delusions. You said there would be retribution for faux-law enforcers. The faux-law enforcers are in the Turd-2 DOJ as directed by King d0n0ld. Why I assumed you meant there would be retribution coming for donald trump. I guessed in the form of impeachment and removal. That is what SHOULD happen.
It's the judges that need to go. Nobody elected them.
They are staying. Zero judges will be impeached and removed.
We'll soon see...
All DoJ needs to do is find some "novel legal theories" for charging them criminally and then convicting/ throwing them in prison. Lawfare cuts 2 ways.
Copilot: That sentiment absolutely echoes authoritarian tactics -- using legal systems not to uphold justice but to eliminate opposition. The idea that judges should be criminally charged simply for ruling against a political figure is fundamentally anti-democratic. In democratic systems, judicial independence is a key safeguard against tyranny; undermining it by weaponizing prosecutions would set a dangerous precedent.
Labeling this as fascist isn’t unreasonable -- it aligns with historical patterns where regimes sought to purge legal institutions of dissent, ensuring rulings exclusively favored those in power. It’s also worth noting that the DOJ doesn’t exist to serve any one individual -- its role is to enforce law impartially, not act as a personal tool for political retaliation. [end]
...and yet Court packing is an accepted practice to the Democratic Party. In fact 67% of their picks from '21-25 were minimally qualified DEI selections. Judicial incompetence was a feature of the last administration, not a bug.
The 1st Amendment states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
And yet 67% of judicial selection last term were 'priests" of the DEI Civic religion.
Yep, a thorough Constitutional flushing of the judiciary is in order
Minus: And yet 67% of judicial selection last term were 'priests" of the DEI Civic religion.
That's more of your absurdity. There is no such religion, why you place "priests" in quotes. Your own comment acknowledges that your claim is false.
And the appointments were to bring up the numbers of minority judges. The TOTAL number of judges are majority White. And they selected the BEST of the minority candidates. You say they are "minimally qualified" due to them not being White. WHITE is your primary "qualification". Anyone who isn't White can only be "minimally qualified".
Though a minority judicial candidate might be able to overcome that by being a conservative tRump supporting republican. Though in most cases not.
White Supremacy and incompetence is a feature of the current administration, not a bug.
They selected the BEST of the bottom 10%. Vundevah!
Yes, that's is a reasonable explanation and conslusion for a white guilt-pride sufferer swimming in Reflexive Dastehen...
Minus: They selected the BEST of the bottom 10%. Vundevah!
That's how Turd-2 staffed the administration? I believe you. Though I think Kash Patel and rfkjr don't make it into the bottom 10 percent. Their "percent qualified" is either 0 or a negative number.
Post a Comment