How much do Human CO2 and other Greenhouse Gas emissions contribute to the Total Global Warming effect upon the Earth? What "percent" is directly attributable to industrialization and human activity in general (aka AGW)? Answer 0.28%. The other 99.72% is completely "natural" (not the result of human activity).
26 comments:
The idea that only 0.28% of global warming is caused by humans is a significant misrepresentation of the scientific data.
Perhaps you could point out the flaw in that argument....
Nope, didn't think so.
btw, when you can prove with 5 Sigma certainty that humans are responsible for Global Warming, give me a call. Then "science" will actually be on your side.
:P
"Perhaps you could point out the flaw in that argument"
It's false.
The Heartland Institute is rightturd propaganda.
lol! Didn't think so.
And the IPCC is Jane Fonda's husband propaganda.
You already didn't think so. Now you aren't thinking so again? It's not worth my time researching this BS. You have previously dismissed information from specific sources due to your claim that the source is no good. I can't do the same?
It's completely ridiculous to suggest that the entirety of the global warming "hysteria" that has been going on for decades has all been "propaganda" and that the majority of the climate scientists that are agreement on this issue are all liars and this is a huge conspiracy. Occam's razor, which you (as a tinfoil hat nutter completely reject) says there is no grand conspiracy and that the scientists (the majority that agree anthropogenic climate change is occurring) are telling the truth.
Funny how much propaganda you can buy with a $1b donation...
You can't do the same? LOL!
So, take the pledge, Derv...
I'm sure that you've got $1-2b laying around.
Minus: I'm sure that you've got $1-2b laying around.
Not lying around. I'd have to sell a significant number of my bitcoins.
Bitcoins don't exist, Derv.
You mean physically? I'm aware of that. Given that they are a digital currency. You didn't know?
...and I'm 20 different people with a digital presence and so should get 20 votes in the next election cycle... lol!
Non sequitur.
You're opposed to cryptocurrency? Then you must be opposed to d0n0ld's idiotic "bitcoin reserve".
btw, I didn't express support for bitcoin. Or voice any opinion about it at all. I have no idea what you think you're disagreeing with me about.
Bitcoins currently exist and can be cashed in for USD or any other currency. Which could then be converted to gold. HOW would this progression be possible if bitcoin doesn't exist?
Physical Gold. Physical Silver. Bi-metalism. Call me a good ole fashioned WJ Bryan progressive.
ps - Nixon was an idiot.
Me: can I use bitcoin to buy gold?
Copilot: Yes, you can use Bitcoin to buy gold! Several reputable dealers, such as Bitgild and SD Bullion, accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as payment for gold bullion, coins, and bars. This demonstrates that Bitcoin functions as a legitimate medium of exchange, even for assets like gold, which are widely trusted for their intrinsic value.
Minus: Call me a good ole fashioned WJ Bryan progressive.
No.
YES.
You're going to make me, Mystere? How are you going to do that?
Truth will never pass his narcissistic lips....
I agree. Though it's pretty clear that Mystere doesn't even know what truth is. Though I think the same is the case with you.
Post a Comment