Conrad Black, "The Swamp Must Be Drained"
The Democrats are increasingly desperate as the return of Donald Trump becomes more likely each week.
They are muddling the sequence of events that got us to the present impasse: Trump ran against the corrupt back-scratching, log-rolling society of the OBushintons—the Clinton pay-to-play schemes, the Biden sales of influence and access, the semi-disguised socialist–racism–elitism of the Obamas, and the flabby sameness and ineffectuality of the Bush–McCain–Romney–McConnell–Ryan Republicans. Trump sensed the people were dissatisfied with the bipartisan Swamp, and he ran as strenuously against the Bushes and McCain and Romney in 2016 as he did against the Clintons and Obamas. The anti-Trumpers of both parties, in the most legally questionable presidential election in U.S. history, eased Trump out in 2020 with the aid of 4.8 million harvested ballots, 95 percent of the national political media, and 70 percent of the campaign money, to bring in (unintentionally one assumes, though there was plenty of warning) the most incompetent regime in the country’s history.
In 2020, the Washington establishment demonstrated the accuracy of Trump’s claims of how corrupt and unscrupulous it was, and Biden has demonstrated that it’s even more incompetent at government than Trump alleged.
The Swamp must be drained, and distasteful though he is in some ways, probably no one less formidable in his egocentricity and demagogic talents than Trump could drain the Swamp. The Republicans between Reagan and Trump were all inducted into it themselves, and the Republican Never-Trumpers are as fierce in their animosity toward the former president as toward the Democrats, and as the Democrats are toward Trump. Only Trump can finish the job.
This is why the latest anti-Trump wheeze is to send Biden and Trump out to pasture together, as if it were an even trade: The Democrats get rid of their two biggest problems, and the Republicans return to being door-mats, awarded the White House and the speaker’s chair at times as long as they don’t interrupt the majestic slide into the Democratic socialist paradise (with a permanent free tax-lunch for their rich friends in Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood).
Biden is irrelevant and Trump has the stamina of a 40-year-old; the call for joint retirement is bunk, on all counts.
Pennsylvania illustrates the political polarization of the country and also provides the solution. The Democrats will nominate a Sandersite leftist for U.S senator and the Republicans will almost certainly win with a Trumpite—a description that fits all four of their front-runners, and all four are more or less carpetbaggers. The Republican nominee will be another senator whose loyalty is to Trump, if he returns as president, and not to Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell. The walls are closing in on the Democrats, to use one of their favorite, completely dishonest phrases about Trump when they were trying to sell the gigantic fraud that he had colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election.
The Democrats hid their innocuous candidate in 2020 in his basement on grounds of COVID-19, while using the same justification for drastic changes in key states of voting and vote-counting rules, changes that were often effected illegally, and the judiciary abdicated and refused to judge any of the serious complaints on their merits. It was the most dangerously illegal assault on the integrity of the election process and on the constitutional balance of powers in the country’s history.
The problem is not that both 2020 candidates are now too elderly. The problem is that 2020 and the run-up to it demonstrated that the Swamp is as venal and self-interested and corrupt as Trump said in 2016, and they are back. If we go back to business as usual—a stronger Democrat than Biden and a compliant consensus Republican—the rot of 2016 accelerates.
When the congressional Republicans, though most of them weren’t really supporters of his, appreciated his program, and between the Republican majority in Congress in the first two years and the prerogatives of executive action, Trump got much of his program through despite unprecedented harassment. The authors of the perfidious fraud of the 2020 election were rescued by Trump’s inept response and the abdication of the judiciary. Trump inadvertently collaborated with his enemies by bungling the daily COVID-19 briefings, bungling the first debate by his belligerency, and warning about ballot harvesting but not challenging it legally from the outset, comprehensively, and only sending poor Rudy Giuliani out on a trick or treat show when the battle was over.
These were the circumstances that caused Trump to call 250,000 of his supporters to the Ellipse adjacent to the White House on Jan. 6, 2021. He enumerated his grievances against the electoral process and the courts’ failure to try the important cases, and having unsuccessfully urged the mayor of Washington and the speaker of the House of Representatives to provide enhanced security for the Capitol on that day, he urged the crowd to demonstrate at the Capitol but to do so “peacefully and patriotically.” This provoked the second asinine stab at impeachment, now ostensibly to remove Trump from an office that he had already vacated. Trump thus provoked in four years a 100 percent increase in the number of presidential impeachments that had occurred in the previous 228 years of its history—the march of the criminalization of policy differences. (None of the four was justified.)
The House of Representatives committee to investigate Jan. 6, stuffed with pathological Trump-haters of both parties and from which Nancy Pelosi barred a couple of Trump’s more prominent defenders, will excavate a new low in malicious partisanship, and will televise its hearings in June. No one believes them and no one cares; 1/6 isn’t the point and wasn’t an insurrection.
There were many months of arrests and interrogations in which it must be assumed that prosecutors resorted extensively to their widespread practice of grossly abusing the plea-bargain rules to suborn and extort perjured inculpatory evidence against their real target, Trump and his organization, with promises of minimal sentences and immunity from prosecution for perjury. This has not turned up anything, and the last thing Trump wanted was anything that could be imputed to him as an attack on constitutional government. That charge is a bit rich coming from this gang of Democrats.
The Democrats have tried to distract the country with the abortion question, but it isn’t working any more than the country believes that Russian leader Vladimir Putin and the oil companies are responsible for the highest gasoline price in American history. Their latest gambit is to try to whip up hysteria one more time on COVID-19, but that won’t fly either. The only person who had anything right about COVID-19 was Trump with his imaginative and determined pursuit of a vaccine.
The Trump-haters of both parties who rattled the windows of Washington when they heaved a sigh of relief at Trump’s departure are only now emerging from denial that he’s about to run over them with a steamroller much larger and more fueled by righteousness than the one they drove over him.
Woke, 1619 revisionism, racist disinformation, and violent protest: All have to be torn up root and branch. But if Trump does return he must give less ammunition to his enemies. American history and public policy are not all about him, and the presidency of the United States is such a great office it requires its occupants to behave with a higher level of civility and dignity than Donald Trump often did when he was president. He will return to that office and do better in it if he is less needlessly abrasive and self-obsessed.
The country can start again in 2028 with new leaders, a fully house-trained post-Trump Republican Party, and a rebuilt Democratic Party over the Ozymandian wreckage of Biden–Sanders–Harris–Schumer–Pelosi.
47 comments:
Bullshit.
Republic Report: Trump is the Most Corrupt President in U.S. History. (Note: Republic Report, a project of the nonprofit group Essential Information, is nonpartisan. Your Republic Report writers strive hard to publish pieces that are entirely accurate and fair...).
The Hill It's official: The Trump campaign colluded with Russia. In an explosive development, the Biden administration confirmed that a Russian government agent with close connections to Donald Trump’s top 2016 campaign official "provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and [Trump] campaign strategy". This revelation demolishes, once and for all, Trump's ceaseless claims that he was the victim of the "greatest witch hunt in the history of our country".
PolitiFact: Claims that the 2020 election was stolen are still false. Donald Trump lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden, and allegations of a rigged election have been refuted by audits, judges, and officials in Trump's administration.
Re "2000 Mules"... The movie's evidence is a combination of anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cell phone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box.
If the "Republic" article were true, how come DJT was the first president in recent history to leave office with a lower net worth than when he entered?
...but Biden gets all his money from the federal salary he draws... BWAH!
gtfu, dervy. Acta non verba!
LOL! Says who? tRump? What are the before and after net worth figures and how was their accuracy verified? Remember tRump lied about his net worth prior to entering the White House. If he's being more truthful now (about what his real net worth is) that doesn't mean he lost money presidenting.
Although, if his net worth is lower, it certainly could be due to his mismanagement of the pandemic. Hospitality and hotels took a beating due to the tRump-ordered lockdown. That doesn't mean he wasn't corrupt.
According to Forbes.
...and yeah, it pretty much means he wasn't corrupt.
and yeah, it pretty much means he wasn't corrupt.
It doesn't.
donald trump lied about being worth 10 billion. 3 billion is likely closer to what his real worth always was. Your link provides zero proof that tRump's left office with a lower net worth than when he entered. btw, Forbes accepted tRump's lie, so (as a source) they are unreliable.
How Donald Trump lied his way onto the Forbes 400 richest people list. "He totally snowed me", says journalist Jonathan Greenberg, who helped compile the list. ... Through five of those years, Forbes continued to list Trump among America's wealthiest, and Greenberg put him on the list in 1982, as well. But he says it was a mistake.
So where are all his retractions and amended articles? Ooooops....
I just refer you all to Trumpworld's early tu quoque construction of "we tried to collude with Russia but they didn't really have any dirt on Hillary but besides collusion isn't illegal Ted Kennedy Ted Kennedy cough cough"
"But he says it was a mistake" sounds like a retraction to me.
Sounds like an irresponsible virtue signal with no professional consequence.
Had he been telling the truth and been a "professional journalist" he would have corrected the entire "incorrect" record.
He did not, so he's either lying/moral virtue signaling or unprofessional. Your choice. Either answer reflects badly on him.
YOU linked to Forbes as YOUR proof of donald tRump's supposed wealth over the years. Yet, for some reason it's on me to defend him ("your choice"). GFY. I don't know how saying someone lied to you is "virtue signaling". ???
btw, Republic Report says tRump is the most corrupt president in US history not only because he used his office to enrich himself. He also enriched his daughter and SIL. And they call him corrupt for non money reasons. His attempt to stay in office after losing the 2020 election, for example.
If tRump's wealth decreased while president (even though "The net worth of Donald Trump is not publicly known") that is not proof he was not a bigly corrupt president.
....says a controller of Gyges cloak.
Say the facts.
...half cloaked.
...by rightturds.
The right owns the media? Who knew?
Fox, Breitbart, NewsMax, OAN, etc aren't right-owned? Who knew?
NBC,ABC,CBS,MSNBC,Disney,Paramount, Sony, Viacom, Time-Warner, Comcast... need I continue?
You only captured 10-15% in your comment.
Disney, Viacom, Time-Warner, Comcast, AP/UPI THAT's who we're talking about.
They're more profit motivated and less ideologically driven.
Leslie Moonves on Donald Trump: "It May Not Be Good for America, but It's Damn Good for CBS".
Disney standing up to trumpturd bigotry and hate is profit-motivated. You're a minority. If you were a majority Disney would be on your side.
NewsMax and OAN won't be around long term. They're capitalizing on magaturd anger (that they're losing the culture wars). Other corporations (that you see as Left-biased) are thinking long term.
They're more profit motivated and less ideologically driven...
BEAH!...explaining why Disney's going broke from getting woke.
LOL. Disney is not going broke.
lol!
LOL! Your own link proves you wrong. Disney is donating its PROFITS. Although only through June. After which it will keep all the profits for itself. You must not understand what "going broke" means.
What profits? Donating = tax write-offs.
∆∆ has bigly reading comprehension problems ∆∆
The profits as stated in the article you linked to.
lol! Will donate profits through June 30. Those are "unrealized" profits... they don't exist.
They'd scrap the line if it were generating no profit. Their donation of ACTUAL profits the clothing line is generating builds goodwill and will lead to increased future sales. Because Disney is profit-motivated. Like I said.
"they don't exist" = you have no idea what you're talking about. As usual.
Disney should be praised for all the anti-woke narratives they promote. In the Eternals, it is a gay black man that gives humanity the atomic bomb "to help them progress." In Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, the blink and you'll miss it lesbian couple gets totally wiped from existence. I think Disney is getting a bad rap and should be cheered for making homosexuality something to abhor and eliminate.
lol! Disney is reduced to marketing their cr*p to the only 10% that will still buy it. They're in "loss minimalization" mode.
CNN Business: Disney Stock Price Forecast... The 27 analysts offering 12-month price forecasts for Walt Disney Co have a median target of 151.00, with a high estimate of 229.00 and a low estimate of 110.00. The median estimate represents a +42.74% increase from the last price of 105.79.
The current consensus among 32 polled investment analysts is to buy stock in Walt Disney Co. This rating has held steady since May, when it was unchanged from a buy rating.
Are your delusions telling you that Disney will be bankrupt soon?
Disney knows where their money is made. They could have removed the Statue of Liberty from the most recent Spider-Man movie to please the docile shovel-toothed Denisovans of China, but losing money in America wouldn't be worth it to them.
lol! YTD stock price -35%...
Yeesh. I knew the Netflix crash was going to hit all the other streaming services, but Disney down 35% YTD is a horror story.
But hey, Exxon and Chevron are up 45%
There are way too many streaming services. Customers aren't going to pay for all of them. And (as per my prior comment) Disney Stock is predicted is increase in value (151.00 to 229.00 per share). The dip you note certainly has nothing at all to do with the simple minded "get woke, go broke" bullplop. Except in rightturd bigot delusions. Analysts definitely wouldn't be saying BUY re a company that was going bankrupt.
If "analysts" could predict the market, they wouldn't be "analysts", they'd be billionaires.
You said Disney is GOING broke. What does "predicting" have to do with seeing what is in the process of happening and saying that might be a good reason to not buy? Though you have yet to provide any actual proof of Disney's impending bankruptcy. I'm not a stock market analyst and I can tell you that there is an almost zero chance of that happening. Disney is definitely not going to go broke because they "got woke". That is a prediction you do not have to be a stock market analyst to make. You only have to not be a moron.
You hung you hat on "experts/ analysts" with no skin in the game, dervish. How stupid is that?
Will Disney buy EA? Given Microsoft's recent game company acquisitions and subscription model, sounds like a pretty "iffy" move.
Disney's going to snap back with all the new Star Wars content they will stream this summer. I don't think it will take their stock to $170 though. People hate advertisements on YouTube. I don't know how many people will take a low tier Disney Plus subscription that has ads.
How stupid is that?
It is smart. The "skin" they have in the game is their reputations and their jobs.
There won't be any rainbow flags on that Star Wars gear...
ps - Then buy Disney, dervish. Put your money where your mouth is.
Post a Comment