Knit-cap-wearing Douche in your video: "[I'm] someone who is not a particular fan of tRump".
LOL! btw, what is a bust is the Dotard sycophants attempt to sell their conspiracy theories during these hearings. Hearings that WILL result in the impeachment of Dotard.
It will be sad for the country if/when such an obviously corrupt man is let off by corrupt party members for purely political reasons. Hopefully these hearings will convince enough people -- this man can NOT get a second term. And people who voted for him the last time will vote against him this time -- and people who thought HRC had it in the bag so they could cast a "protest" ballot for Jill Stein will vote for the Democratic nominee this time -- and people who thought HRC was a shoe-in so they didn't bother to take the time to vote will turn out this time. And the result will be that (even with the massive cheating in Dotard's favor that is certain to occur) Putin's puppet will be soundly defeated and the Democratic nominee will become the next president.
And then the next AG can proceed to prosecute, convict and imprison the Dotard administration criminals :)
Breitbart is fake new central. Read the article and the comments -- which are totally nuts. fyi, Dotard will have been tried, convicted and served several years behind bars before 2025 -- God willing. If Satan and Putin are successful and Dotard remains predisent the USA is f*cked.
Why, oh why was Dotard at Walter Reed yesterday? It could be for an innocent reason, like having his impacted anal glands expressed. I have heard, however, that Dotard has terminal windmill cancer.
I don't know. Ask your doctor. I assume he has diagnosed you with a severe case of TDS and prescribed some strong anti-psychotic drugs to keep it in check. Although you probably angrily stormed out and are not currently taking the medication you desperately need.
You don't believe there is an ongoing coup attempt to oust Dotard from office that involves a "Deep State" scheme to frame Dotard and Russia for colluding and hacking the DNC server to swing the election in Dotard's favor?
The Intelligence Community bureaucrat of "Russians" and the partisan Democrat of "Trump"...
4 The error of imaginary causes. To begin with dreams: ex post facto, a cause is slipped under a particular sensation (for example, one following a far-off cannon shot)--often a whole little novel in which the dreamer turns up as the protagonist. The sensation endures meanwhile in a kind of resonance: it waits, as it were, until the causal instinct permits it to step into the foreground--now no longer as a chance occurrence, but as "meaning." The cannon shot appears in a causal mode, in an apparent reversal of time. What is really later, the motivation, is experienced first--often with a hundred details which pass like lightning and the shot follows. What has happened? The representations which were produced by a certain state have been misunderstood as its causes.
In fact, we do the same thing when awake. Most of our general feelings--every kind of inhibition, pressure, tension, and explosion in the play and counterplay of our organs, and particularly the state of the nervus sympaticus--excite our causal instinct: we want to have a reason for feeling this way or that--for feeling bad or for feeling good. We are never satisfied merely to state the fact that we feel this way or that: we admit this fact only--become conscious of it only--when we have furnished some kind of motivation. Memory, which swings into action in such cases, unknown to us, brings up earlier states of the same kind, together with the causal interpretations associated with them--not their real causes. The faith, to be sure, that such representations, such accompanying conscious processes are the causes is also brought forth by memory. Thus originates a habitual acceptance of a particular causal interpretation, which, as a matter of fact, inhibits any investigation into the real cause--even precludes it.
5 The psychological explanation of this. To derive something unknown from something familiar relieves, comforts, and satisfies, besides giving a feeling of power. With the unknown, one is confronted with danger, discomfort, and care; the first instinct is to abolish these painful states. First principle: any explanation is better than none. Since at bottom it is merely a matter of wishing to be rid of oppressive representations, one is not too particular about the means of getting rid of them: the first representation that explains the unknown as familiar feels so good that one "considers it true." The proof of pleasure ("of strength") as a criterion of truth.
The causal instinct is thus conditional upon, and excited by, the feeling of fear. The "why?" shall, if at all possible, not give the cause for its own sake so much as for a particular kind of cause--a cause that is comforting, liberating, and relieving. That it is something already familiar, experienced, and inscribed in the memory, which is posited as a cause, that is the first consequence of this need. That which is new and strange and has not been experienced before, is excluded as a cause. Thus one searches not only for some kind of explanation to serve as a cause, but for a particularly selected and preferred kind of explanation--that which has most quickly and most frequently abolished the feeling of the strange, new, and hitherto unexperienced: the most habitual explanations. Consequence: one kind of positing of causes predominates more and more, is concentrated into a system and finally emerges as dominant, that is, as simply precluding other causes and explanations. The banker immediately thinks of "business," the Christian of "sin," and the girl of her love.
Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and it's security services did not conduct a campaign against our country. And that, perhaps, somehow, for some reason Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that is being perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves. The unfortunate truth is the Russia is the foreign power that systematically attacked or democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. [End Fiona Hill testimony excerpt].
You preclude other causes and explanations other than your imaginary "deep state" bullshit due to your cultish and fanatical embrace of the moron Dotard. The Orange Turd Cult member immediately thinks of inane conspiracies and their love and devotion for a racist, misogynist low IQ orange turd who hates the same people they hate.
What percentage of the majority who believe Dotard should be impeached and removed do you think are crazy?
As for the "intellectually honest Left", you only say that because they agree with your craziness. Lots of people agree with the facts as presented by Fiona Hill in her impeachment hearing testimony. LOTS. Not buying Russian disinformation hook, line and sinker is hardly crazy.
25 comments:
Knit-cap-wearing Douche in your video: "[I'm] someone who is not a particular fan of tRump".
LOL! btw, what is a bust is the Dotard sycophants attempt to sell their conspiracy theories during these hearings. Hearings that WILL result in the impeachment of Dotard.
...but NOT the conviction. So sad for you...
:)
It will be sad for the country if/when such an obviously corrupt man is let off by corrupt party members for purely political reasons. Hopefully these hearings will convince enough people -- this man can NOT get a second term. And people who voted for him the last time will vote against him this time -- and people who thought HRC had it in the bag so they could cast a "protest" ballot for Jill Stein will vote for the Democratic nominee this time -- and people who thought HRC was a shoe-in so they didn't bother to take the time to vote will turn out this time. And the result will be that (even with the massive cheating in Dotard's favor that is certain to occur) Putin's puppet will be soundly defeated and the Democratic nominee will become the next president.
And then the next AG can proceed to prosecute, convict and imprison the Dotard administration criminals :)
LOCK HIM UP! Him being Dotard.
"Him" being the liar, Adam Shifty Schiff.
And yes, Trump WILL be the US President until 2025. The Democrats have GUARANTEED it. :)
"Criminal Enterprise" thy name is DNC.
Oh where, oh where is my Soros today, oh where, oh where can he be?
Breitbart is fake new central. Read the article and the comments -- which are totally nuts. fyi, Dotard will have been tried, convicted and served several years behind bars before 2025 -- God willing. If Satan and Putin are successful and Dotard remains predisent the USA is f*cked.
Perhaps it isn't Breitbart that's been hitting the dope-pipe too hard, Dervy. Most likely.... it's YOU! :)
I'm uncertain what a "dope-pipe" is. If you're talking about marijuana, I have never tried it.
Why, oh why was Dotard at Walter Reed yesterday? It could be for an innocent reason, like having his impacted anal glands expressed. I have heard, however, that Dotard has terminal windmill cancer.
...is that as serious as TDS?
I don't know. Ask your doctor. I assume he has diagnosed you with a severe case of TDS and prescribed some strong anti-psychotic drugs to keep it in check. Although you probably angrily stormed out and are not currently taking the medication you desperately need.
How so? I'm not the one obsessed with The Russian Agent also known as "PotUS".
You don't believe there is an ongoing coup attempt to oust Dotard from office that involves a "Deep State" scheme to frame Dotard and Russia for colluding and hacking the DNC server to swing the election in Dotard's favor?
One must rationalize a "cause" for your TDS somewhere. It's either that, or accept the fact that your TDS is just, plain, crazy.
The Intelligence Community bureaucrat of "Russians" and the partisan Democrat of "Trump"...
4 The error of imaginary causes. To begin with dreams: ex post facto, a cause is slipped under a particular sensation (for example, one following a far-off cannon shot)--often a whole little novel in which the dreamer turns up as the protagonist. The sensation endures meanwhile in a kind of resonance: it waits, as it were, until the causal instinct permits it to step into the foreground--now no longer as a chance occurrence, but as "meaning." The cannon shot appears in a causal mode, in an apparent reversal of time. What is really later, the motivation, is experienced first--often with a hundred details which pass like lightning and the shot follows. What has happened? The representations which were produced by a certain state have been misunderstood as its causes.
In fact, we do the same thing when awake. Most of our general feelings--every kind of inhibition, pressure, tension, and explosion in the play and counterplay of our organs, and particularly the state of the nervus sympaticus--excite our causal instinct: we want to have a reason for feeling this way or that--for feeling bad or for feeling good. We are never satisfied merely to state the fact that we feel this way or that: we admit this fact only--become conscious of it only--when we have furnished some kind of motivation. Memory, which swings into action in such cases, unknown to us, brings up earlier states of the same kind, together with the causal interpretations associated with them--not their real causes. The faith, to be sure, that such representations, such accompanying conscious processes are the causes is also brought forth by memory. Thus originates a habitual acceptance of a particular causal interpretation, which, as a matter of fact, inhibits any investigation into the real cause--even precludes it.
5 The psychological explanation of this. To derive something unknown from something familiar relieves, comforts, and satisfies, besides giving a feeling of power. With the unknown, one is confronted with danger, discomfort, and care; the first instinct is to abolish these painful states. First principle: any explanation is better than none. Since at bottom it is merely a matter of wishing to be rid of oppressive representations, one is not too particular about the means of getting rid of them: the first representation that explains the unknown as familiar feels so good that one "considers it true." The proof of pleasure ("of strength") as a criterion of truth.
The causal instinct is thus conditional upon, and excited by, the feeling of fear. The "why?" shall, if at all possible, not give the cause for its own sake so much as for a particular kind of cause--a cause that is comforting, liberating, and relieving. That it is something already familiar, experienced, and inscribed in the memory, which is posited as a cause, that is the first consequence of this need. That which is new and strange and has not been experienced before, is excluded as a cause. Thus one searches not only for some kind of explanation to serve as a cause, but for a particularly selected and preferred kind of explanation--that which has most quickly and most frequently abolished the feeling of the strange, new, and hitherto unexperienced: the most habitual explanations. Consequence: one kind of positing of causes predominates more and more, is concentrated into a system and finally emerges as dominant, that is, as simply precluding other causes and explanations. The banker immediately thinks of "business," the Christian of "sin," and the girl of her love.
--Nietzsche, "Twilight of the Idols"
Impeachment hearing witness Fiona Hill yesterday:
Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and it's security services did not conduct a campaign against our country. And that, perhaps, somehow, for some reason Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that is being perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves. The unfortunate truth is the Russia is the foreign power that systematically attacked or democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. [End Fiona Hill testimony excerpt].
You preclude other causes and explanations other than your imaginary "deep state" bullshit due to your cultish and fanatical embrace of the moron Dotard. The Orange Turd Cult member immediately thinks of inane conspiracies and their love and devotion for a racist, misogynist low IQ orange turd who hates the same people they hate.
btw, "Criminal Enterprise" thy name is RNC.
So, you're just crazy, plain and simple. I guess I gave you too much credit via my caritas..
ps - Nobody believes what Fiona says. Both countries attempted influence.
Views from the intellectually honest Left...
:)
What percentage of the majority who believe Dotard should be impeached and removed do you think are crazy?
As for the "intellectually honest Left", you only say that because they agree with your craziness. Lots of people agree with the facts as presented by Fiona Hill in her impeachment hearing testimony. LOTS. Not buying Russian disinformation hook, line and sinker is hardly crazy.
Believing a half truth to be the whole truth is crazy. Just ask Odysseus' cyclops.
Great! Admitting you have a problem is the first step. Next you need to get help for your terrible case of TDS.
Post a Comment