I see you found a youtube video to confirm your biases. Me, I think it's suspicious how quickly toady Barr was to confirm it was suicide. And I heard it was toady Barr who had Epstein moved to that prison. More likely toady Barr is doing more dirty work to cover up for his corrupt boss.
Barr signaled he would be a loyal toady with his unsolicited audition letter (the one in which he claimed it would be impossible for Dotard to obstruct justice). You call acknowledging facts being "biased". And it was a lawyer of Dotard that wrote "predisent". BTW, I just used "Dotard" and that might TRIGGER you... but that is the word Kim Jong Un used to describe his lover.
I call acknowledging only a small and select and partisan part of the total set of facts available and disavowing the excluded others as being "biased", yes.
Because they are lies. Which are fine by you, so why do you complain? You believing tRump's lies are great is why your motto is "acta non verba" - aka it is good to lie to distract from bad actions.
… “There is no special ingredient. It’s only you. To make something special you just have to believe it is special.” This formula renders the fetishistic disavowal (split) at its purest — its message is: “I KNOW very well there is no special ingredient, but I nonetheless BELIEVE in it (and act accordingly).” Cynical denunciation (at the level of rational knowledge) is counteracted by the call of “irrational” belief — and this is the most elementary formula of how ideology functions today." — Zizek, L it ET, 70
"Identity struggle" serves to prop up capitalism and mask class struggle. You probably don't even think of yourself as a member of the bourgeois elite.
Your identity is wrapped up in your Whiteness. You'd reject Dotard if it weren't. And not voice admiration for Hitler, insist Black people have lower IQs, etc. If class struggle is what we should be most concerned about (and I agree it is) why not renounce racism? The oligarchs use racism to divide us, and you (the useful idiot that you are) play along enthusiastically.
I did not say Dotard had no minority support. I say his minority support is smaller than any republican president ever. Re: "That very fact" - I don't accept your "fact". Acta non verba - you voted for and support a racist.
17 comments:
I see you found a youtube video to confirm your biases. Me, I think it's suspicious how quickly toady Barr was to confirm it was suicide. And I heard it was toady Barr who had Epstein moved to that prison. More likely toady Barr is doing more dirty work to cover up for his corrupt boss.
At least I don't preface my obvious bias' with words like "toady" and "Predisent.". :)
Barr signaled he would be a loyal toady with his unsolicited audition letter (the one in which he claimed it would be impossible for Dotard to obstruct justice). You call acknowledging facts being "biased". And it was a lawyer of Dotard that wrote "predisent". BTW, I just used "Dotard" and that might TRIGGER you... but that is the word Kim Jong Un used to describe his lover.
I call acknowledging only a small and select and partisan part of the total set of facts available and disavowing the excluded others as being "biased", yes.
The "disavowed facts", or "alternate facts" (as they may have been presented to you as), you then laugh at and call "lies".
Because they are lies. Which are fine by you, so why do you complain? You believing tRump's lies are great is why your motto is "acta non verba" - aka it is good to lie to distract from bad actions.
^^THE FETISHIST'S DISAVOWAL^^
… “There is no special ingredient. It’s only you. To make something special you just have to believe it is special.” This formula renders the fetishistic disavowal (split) at its purest — its message is: “I KNOW very well there is no special ingredient, but I nonetheless BELIEVE in it (and act accordingly).” Cynical denunciation (at the level of rational knowledge) is counteracted by the call of “irrational” belief — and this is the most elementary formula of how ideology functions today."
— Zizek, L it ET, 70
Next comes the abyss...
So, if you realize that about yourself, what are you going to do about it? Stop supporting the (self proclaimed) "chosen one"?
"Trump is a fetish, he is the last thing liberals see before they are forced to confront the logic of class struggle." - Slavoj Zizek
ps - I'm not the "liberal" he's talking about, above. :)
This Slavoj Zizek is obviously an idiot.
No, he's someone who knows what Marxism actually is/does. It's Class struggle, not "identity struggle".
"Identity struggle" serves to prop up capitalism and mask class struggle. You probably don't even think of yourself as a member of the bourgeois elite.
Your identity is wrapped up in your Whiteness. You'd reject Dotard if it weren't. And not voice admiration for Hitler, insist Black people have lower IQs, etc. If class struggle is what we should be most concerned about (and I agree it is) why not renounce racism? The oligarchs use racism to divide us, and you (the useful idiot that you are) play along enthusiastically.
Trump has no minority supporters? Who knew?
I don't give a sh*t about "whiteness". That very fact should also informed you as to "who" is being manipulated by oligarchs.
I did not say Dotard had no minority support. I say his minority support is smaller than any republican president ever. Re: "That very fact" - I don't accept your "fact". Acta non verba - you voted for and support a racist.
Post a Comment