...brought to you by DJT, the Billionaire Boy's Club (BBC), and the Silicon Valley Bros
The Old Kayfabe Democracy is Dead!
As Are Now the Hopes of MAGA "Prairie Populists" Like Me
Prairie populism was a late 19th and early 20th-century agrarian movement in the U.S. Great Plains and Western Canada, pitting farmers against urban, corporate elites, railroad monopolies, and bankers. Driven by economic hardship, it favored government regulation, cooperatives, and monetary reform to combat rising debt, low crop prices, and high shipping rates.
Key aspects of prairie populism include:It was a significant, albeit often short-lived, challenge to the established two-party system, driven by the belief that the economic system was rigged against rural workers.
- The Populist Party (People's Party): Particularly strong in Kansas and Nebraska, this movement mobilized rural communities to fight for farmers' interests and against the influence of Eastern finance.
- Agrarian Radicalism: Populists aimed to "raise less corn and more hell," advocating for policies such as the free coinage of silver, government ownership of railroads, and a graduated income tax.
- Widespread Mobilization: The movement included active participation from women, such as speaker and writer Mary Elizabeth Lease, who organized campaigns and challenged the political status quo.
- Regional Differences: While strong in the Plains states, this form of populism faced different receptions elsewhere, with Iowa, for example, remaining less receptive, as shown in studies by Jeffrey Ostler.
- Canadian Context: In Canada, agrarian populist sentiments similarly fostered the rise of cooperatives and social movements in the Western provinces, notes this Springer Nature Link article.
39 comments:
Thanks to donald trump and his alliance with Peter Thiel's advocate, JD Vance. So, thanks to maga. The same group of gullible morons we have to thank for the war in Iran.
You gave us the Ukraine war... so, "you're welcome!"
I'm not Vladimir Putin.
No, you're Barack Obama that coup'd the gov in 2014 and caused the Donbas split.
LESTER, IT LOOKS AS IF THE MEMBERS OF THESE BOARDS HAVE FUNNILY GOTTEN YOUR NUMBER CORRECTLY, AND THAT YPOU REALLY ARE AN ANTISEMITIC LOSER!
With the nation reeling from an outbreak of violent incidents in the wake of the U.S. military strikes against Iran, the media clarified that there was no known motive yet in the attack on a Jewish Synagogue by a radical Muslim.
Though an outspoken Islamic extremist who originated from the Middle East and had expressed support for ISIS and loaded his car with explosives and rammed it directly into a synagogue and daycare facility, journalists explained that there simply wasn't any way to know at this point why he committed such an act.
"We may never know," said one reporter. "These acts of violence are often so random and take place without any discernible motive behind them, so the reason why this Muslim man seemed to intentionally target a place where Jewish people congregate. It is, by all accounts, just a completely random tragedy."
Other journalists speculated that the incident may have resulted from something completely unrelated to the fact that the attacker was a radical Muslim and the victims were Jewish people. "It's difficult to settle on any one correlation," another reporter said. "We'll do our best to connect the dots, but quite frankly, this one is likely to remain a mystery."
One of Mohammad's last instructions, many years go, was (to paraphrase) 'Fight all of the Humans until the whole word has converted to Islam'.
The Left Wing Media is always dishonest.
The Media doesn't want to offend the genocidal Goat Humping wing of the Democrat Party's coalition of Hate.
According to the Race to the White House website, Kamala Harris has a 27.5 percent national polling average, while California Gov. Gavin Newsom has a 22.7 percent national polling average.
Harris: 27.5%
Newsom: 22.7%
AOC: 9.0%
Buttigieg: 8.7%
Kelly: 5.2%
Shapiro: 4.9%
Pritzker: 3.4%
Crockett: 3.3%
Booker: 3.0%
Whitmer: 2.6%
Walz: 2.6%
Cuban: 2.4%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a 9 percent national polling average, while former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has an 8.7 percent national polling average.
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro received a 4.9 percent national polling average, while Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker received a 3.4 percent national polling average.
The Democrats are in sad, sad shape.
That's incredible, Kamala Harris who couldn't even pull 5% in the primary, and now she’s leading the heir-apparent Newsom, in his own state? I can’t believe that people would vote for Harris...She'd lose again.
How embarrassing for Gavin Newsom that he is LOSING in the polls to a Laughing, Giggling and Cackling Hyena will be the Democrat party leading Candidate
The Stupid Leftards are in a confused mess. They don't get mad about not being able to vote, but they Get Mad when these illegal Criminals are prevented from voting.
I would think that out of this bunch of Idiots Pete Buttigieg would do better then he is doing. She isn’t diverse enough, they need a transcended Queer to represent their party.
The Dumb left are even dumber than I imagined having Kamala Harris: the Giggling Word-Salad Marxist leading the party!.
But don’t get ahead of yourself Mr. Democrat’s, you're not voting for any Democrat either. You're going to get whatever Idiot Loser your party selects for you, just like they did in the 2024 primary election. So it doesn’t mean who’s on the ballot, your Fascist party will tell you who they were nominating.
Minus: No, you're Barack Obama that coup'd the gov in 2014 and caused the Donbas split.
Except that didn't happen. It has been debunked.
Yes, 'debunked' by the press control organs of the Deep State's Censorship Bureaucracy.
In other words... never debunked, just labelled a "conspiracy theory" to be immediately dismissed by Oficialistas like you.. Facts be damned.... hyper-realities restored.
What you're referring to is listed on the Wikipedia page "George Soros Conspiracy Theories".
Many of the conspiracies tied to George Soros revolved around him organizing the Color Revolutions in countries formerly occupied by the Soviet Union. Serbia's Bulldozer Revolution in 2000, Georgia's Rose Revolution of 2003, and Ukraine's Orange Revolution of 2004 all helped spark conspiracy theories about George Soros.
You're very inclined to believe antisemitic conspiracy theories due to being a White Supremacist. Barack Obama being Black cinches it for you. Obviously a black man from Kenya (in your delusions) and a Jewish globalist are behind the evil plot for Ukrainian citizens to not be ruled by a Russian puppet🙄🙄🙄
Minus: In other words... never debunked, just labelled a "conspiracy theory" to be immediately dismissed by Oficialistas like you.. Facts be damned.... hyper-realities restored.
No. It was debunked. But held onto by you as what really happened due to you being a tinfoil hat wearing White Supremacist. Facts be damned and tinfoil hat conspiracy theory delusions reinforced.
🤖g00gle AI Overview...
Claims that the Barack Obama administration funded a 2014 "color revolution" in Ukraine often stem from misinterpreted U.S. support for civil society and democratic development. While the U.S. did invest roughly $5 billion in Ukrainian development since 1991, this was not a direct investment to fund the 2014 uprising.
Key Details on 2014 Ukrainian Events:
Support for Protests: The Obama administration and diplomats, such as Victoria Nuland, expressed support for the pro-Western protestors (Euromaidan) against President Viktor Yanukovych.
"Color Revolution" Disinformation: EUvsDisinfo states that labeling the spontaneous, citizen-led protests as a foreign-led color revolution is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative.
USAID Funding: US officials, including at USAID, stated that funds supported civil society, democracy, and economic reforms, not revolution.
Obama's Approach: President Obama focused on managing the crisis with a focus on stability, rather than actively orchestrating the regime change, notes a 2014 report from The New York Times.
$5 Billion Myth: The $5 billion figure often cited was not used to pay for the revolution, but was rather a total estimate of US support for Ukraine's democratic development, NGOs, and civil society since 1991, notes a report by Die Zeit.
The 2014 Revolution of Dignity (or Euromaidan) began after President Yanukovych refused to sign a trade pact with the European Union. 🛑
Minus thinks if Putin says it, that means it's true. Because Putin is a truth telling kind of guy. And OF COURSE, Barack Obama (being Black and a Democrat) would lie and stand with the globalists.
You being pro-Putin and Pro-White Supremacy go hand in hand. donald trump can't be a globalist due to him wildly misunderstanding how tariffs even work and using them to hurt Americans, not help them. Except he agrees with you that minorities are inferior to Whites. Therefore he has your best interests at heart🙄🙄🙄
You just found out that his claim that he wouldn't start new wars was completely false. But he is still willing to scapegoat non-whites. As you claimed on this blog... he is still "making America great" by backing White Supremacy🙄🙄🙄
Yes, a "pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign" that revealed actual US control and influence over the formation of a new Ukrainian government.
It was all part of the plan, supported by a little "Soros Alchemy" and USAID.
...all accusatory "race" based aspects above being "non-essential".
You've brought up this phone call previously. So what? Nobody denies that the preference of the United States was for any country to be democratic. As a fascist I know that angers you. What you claim happened in Ukraine is going on the United States right now with Putin using his puppets here to flip the US fascist. But that doesn't seem to concern you.
Copilot response re your assertions that the united states was behind the Ukraine revolution, it wouldn't have happened if not for US/Soros meddling, and the phone call you linked to is evidence of your assertions.
🤖That tracks perfectly with how this argument usually unfolds. The YouTube clip of the Nuland–Pyatt call has become *the* go‑to “evidence” for people who want to claim the U.S. staged a coup in Ukraine — even though the content of the call doesn’t actually show that.
Let me give you a clean, grounded way to understand what’s going on here, and why the link to that audio doesn’t prove what “Joe Conservative” thinks it proves.
The timeline alone disproves the “Obama coup’d the gov” claim. Here’s the sequence:
**Nov 2013**
Millions of Ukrainians begin protesting Yanukovych’s decision to abandon an EU agreement.
**Dec 2013 – Jan 2014**
Protests grow into a nationwide uprising. Clashes escalate. Yanukovych’s approval collapses. Members of his own party defect.
**Feb 2014**
The Nuland–Pyatt call happens. The protests are already months old and enormous.
**Feb 21–22, 2014**
Yanukovych flees Kyiv after his own security forces kill protesters and parliament turns on him.
**After Yanukovych flees**
Russia seizes Crimea. Russian-backed separatists begin taking buildings in Donbas.
Nothing in that sequence resembles a U.S.-run coup.
🗣️ What the call actually shows...
U.S. diplomats discussing which Ukrainian opposition figures they think are competent. Frustration with the EU. Attempts to coordinate diplomatic pressure. A desire for a stable, non-chaotic transition.
It does **not** show...
Planning a coup. Directing the protests. Controlling Ukrainian politics. Removing Yanukovych. Installing a government.
It’s the kind of conversation diplomats have *every day* about countries in crisis.🛑
Why then would the new Ukrainian government listen to Nuland (per phone call) and follow her recomendations vis "the new political administration leadership"
We had nothing to do with the coup, but picked all the new leaders of the new Ukrainian government.... "what a coinkydink!"
Minus: We had nothing to do with the coup, but picked all the new leaders of the new Ukrainian government.
Except that didn't happen.
👉1. Arseniy Yatseniuk aka “Yats”.
What Nuland said: “He should be in the government.”
What actually happened: He did not take a position in the immediate transitional government formed after Yanukovych fled.
Conclusion: He did not get the job she thought he should get.
👉2. Vitali Klitschko.
What Nuland said: He should not take a government post yet.
What actually happened: He did not take a government post — because he was already planning to run for mayor of Kyiv, which he later won.
Conclusion: His decision matched his own political strategy, not U.S. direction.
👉3. Oleh Tyahnybok.
What Nuland said: He should stay “on the outside” and advise.
What actually happened: He did not take a government post — because he was too far-right for a unity government and was never considered for a cabinet role.
Conclusion: His exclusion was expected and internally driven.🛑
ZERO leaders were selected as per the phone call. Not even one, let alone "all". (Summary provided by Copilot).
LOL!
Arseniy Yatsenyuk is a Ukrainian politician, economist, and lawyer who served as the Prime Minister of Ukraine from February 2014 to April 2016, leading the country immediately following the Maidan Revolution.
Mayor of Kiev isn't a government post? Who knew? Perhaps Mayor of NYC isn't a government post, either?
As for Oleh Tyahnybok, He was the defacto Nazi leader of the Maidan coup, and later ran the war in the Donbas that precipitated the Russian invasion for Joe Biden.
Muh, Kill Ruskies!
In 2013 Tyahnybok's Svoboda Party was banned from visiting the US because they were "far right anti-semites". In 2014, he met with Biden IN DC. Then he facilitates the Maidan coup and later he's banished from government so he can go kick ass in the Donbass and give the ukrainians "plausible deniable" for the atrocities committed there...
Right Sector, fielded the most violent perpetrators and committed the lion’s share of attacks.8 That study is restricted temporally, however, to the 2014 Maidan protests, which led to the violent overthrow of the relatively pro-Russian government and ultimately spiralled into the civil war in Donbas, the Russian annexation of Crimea, and Russian military interventions in these regions of Ukraine.9 Similarly, qualitative studies have presented evidence in the form of videos, eyewitness testimonies, confessions, and forensic examinations of Svoboda and Right Sector involvement in the Maidan massacre.10 Some other studies have focused on specific aspects of the far-right paramilitary and other armed formations during the war in Donbas.11 One academic publication is specifically devoted to the Odesa massacre, which is called “The Odesa Tragedy,” though it concentrates on the public perceptions rather than the perpetrators and their consequences. 12 This list of prior works is intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. The research landscape around these issues is growing, but uneven in scope and reliability; a lacuna remains in the literature in terms of evaluating rigorously, comprehensively, and dispassionately the nature and extent of far-right involvement in the Donbas war and Odesa massacre, which in terms of understanding the Russia-Ukraine conflict and political violence more generally...
In sum, ultra-nationalist and neo-Nazi militant organizations were deeply involved on the side of the central government throughout the Donbas conflict. Although representing a small fraction of Ukrainian forces throughout the conflict, they committed a disproportionate amount of violence, particularly before President Poroshenko ordered the Ukrainian military to increase its use of force against the separatists in the summer of 2014. The much-touted absorption of Azov and other extreme right-wing militia under the official Ukrainian National Guard, police, and military command did not change either their command or their ideological displays. Many of the fighters worked closely with Kyiv political leadership across administrations, when not using de facto veto power to block resolution of the conflict in the region.
Source
Biden with a war criminal , Oleh Tyahnybok... and with John McCain. Both NED's NDI and IRI funded the extremists through USAID.
We LOVE Nazi war criminals!
I guess that, to you, correlation is causation. Victoria Nuland said Arseniy Yatsenyuk was acceptable. The Ukraine parliament selected him. Therefore he was selected by the United States. No evidence of this being what actually happened is necessary. The phone call is enough and confirms that is what happened definitively (as per your delusions).
But this wasn't even the topic of discussion. I brought up wars started by republican presidents (Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran). You "countered" with a war started by Vladimir Putin and (via a debunked conspiracy theory) tried to blame Barack Obama. Even if that was true, Barack Obama never ordered Ukraine bombed or sent US troops to Ukraine. That was Vladimir Putin. Even if your delusions were true, Afghanistan/Iraq/Iran aren't comparable to Ukraine (and you accusation is NOT true anyway).
Copilot says "Arseniy Yatsenyuk absolutely did accept a position in the Ukrainian government — he served twice as Prime Minister of Ukraine.
This is confirmed by multiple authoritative sources, including Wikipedia and official biographies. If someone previously told you he didn’t accept a position, that statement was incorrect".
The "someone" was copilot. I don't have names of Ukrainian leader past and present memorized. I assumed I was getting correct information. But (for the reasons I just gave), it doesn't matter. He got the job, but it was not at the direction of the United States.
Copilot revised answer...
🤖Even if the U.S. had said nothing, Yatsenyuk was already the most likely candidate because of Ukraine’s internal political math. The U.S. preference didn’t create his viability — it reflected it. Parliament didn’t choose him because the U.S. wanted him. Parliament chose him because he was the only candidate who could form a coalition and run a government during a crisis. The U.S. didn’t cause that; they were reacting to it. 🛑
According to Copilot most of what you write about Oleh Tyahnybok is false. (T summarize). The party wasn't banned from visiting the US, Joe Biden never met with him, that he facilitated the coup is a huge overstatement, and that he was banished so he could commit atrocities in Donbas (with plausible deniability) is fiction.
Projecting the devastating losses your fascist trumpublican cult will experience in 2026 and 2028?
Unless your malignant narcissist Fuhrer declares a national emergency and prevents free and fair elections.
So the picture of him above with the "Love" link with Obama and getting sniffed by Creepy Joe was AI generated? Who knew?
The 2026 and 2028 and 2028 will be meaningless. The new kayfabe will prevail, regardless. When the ground war starts, and the boys start coming home in bodybags, the country will rally behind Trump and seal Neoliberalism 5.0 kayfabe permanently.
It's called the "Wag the Dog" strategy.
...it worked in Iraq in March 2003.
🤖“NED, NDI, and IRI funded extremists” — also false.
Here’s what those organizations actually do:
NED (National Endowment for Democracy).
NDI (National Democratic Institute).
IRI (International Republican Institute).
They fund election monitoring, civil society groups, anti‑corruption NGOs, media literacy programs, political party training (for all parties, including centrists and moderates).
They do not fund extremist militias or far‑right parties. There is no evidence — none — that USAID, NED, NDI, or IRI funded Svoboda or Tyahnybok. This is a common Russian propaganda claim, but it has no documentary basis.🛑
But, to you, everything Vladimir Putin says is truth🙄🙄🙄
Minus: So the picture of him above with the "Love" link with Obama and getting sniffed by Creepy Joe was AI generated? Who knew?
🤖Copilot says ...the photo is real. It’s from a 2014 group meeting with multiple Ukrainian lawmakers. Tyahnybok was one of them, but it wasn’t a private meeting or an endorsement — just standard diplomacy.🛑
It was a meeting with Ukrainian lawmakers. Tyahnybok was, at that time, a member the Ukrainian government. There was no meeting specifically with him. Joe Biden didn't whisper in his ear, "Barack and I like and approve of your Naziness".
It is interesting that you completely ignored the rest of what I wrote and instead continued with your attempts to blame Barack Obama for the Ukrainian war. When invading Ukraine was Vladimir Putin's decision. He was not forced into it by Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Minus: When the ground war starts, and the boys start coming home in bodybags, the country will rally behind Trump and seal Neoliberalism 5.0 kayfabe permanently.
The public is turning against king donald now. They will turn against him MORE if/when that happens. Iran isn't a repeat of 9/11 leading to Iraq. The gwb administration actually tried to sell the war with Iraq prior to invading it. king donald just ordered Iran be bombed.
The voters will be looking to the Democrats to stop the madness instead of accepting a repeat of the Afghanistan/Iraq wars. The voters are very stupid, but I think they are not that stupid. They bought donald trump's lies prior to the election. People are waking up now, not getting jazzed about accepting more lies.
Mystere will be all in, of course. But he is a complete moron.
Americans returning home in body bags and the reporting of such a horrific reality will likely be barred from happening. The trump regime will insure that there will be no visuals and reporting will likely be propagandized with little relevance to actual fact.
No evidence... BWAH!
from Google AI:
As of early 2026, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) budget is experiencing significant volatility, with proposed cuts for FY 2026 aiming to reduce spending to around $5.79 billion, a sharp decline from previous years. In contrast, FY 2024 saw roughly $21.7 billion in spending, while earlier estimates showed total aid management above $35 billion
When I worked for NASA, our annual was about $15b. What was USAID spending ALL that money on?...
btw - After Maidan, direct USAID funding to Tyahnybok wasn't as necessary, as Svoboda had a direct presence in the Ukrainian government and control over US provided funds to it.
Deputy Prime Minister - Oleksand Sych (Svoboda Party)
National Security Secretary - Andriy Parubiy (co-founder of the Neo-Nazi Social National Party from which Svoboda spun off)
Deputy Secretary for National Security Dmytro Yarosh (Head of Right Sector)
Chief Prosecutor Oleh Makhnitsky (Svoboda)
Minister of Agriculture and Ecology BOTH from Svoboda
More on the "players" mentioned above:
source
This version was later confirmed by the former Chief of the SSU (Security Service of Ukraine) A. Yakimenko in his interview with the ‘Russia 1’ TV channel on March 12, 2014. He said that unidentified snipers shooting at people from both sides (’Berkut’ members and civilians from the opposition alike) on February 20, 2014 were based in the Philharmonics building that was controlled by opposition forces and the so-called ‘Commandant of Maidan’, A. Parubiy, who was appointed Secretary to Ukraine’s National Security and Defence Council after the events of 21–22 February 2014. A. Yakimenko also noted that A. Parubiy had full control over the turnover of arms on Maidan, and not a single pistol, let alone a sniper rifle, could be brought in or out of the square without him knowing. A. Yakimenko said that, when the shootings began, he was approached by the ‘Right Sector leader D. Yarosh and the ‘Freedom’ leader O. Tyahnybok requesting to use the ‘Alpha’ Special Unit forces of the SSU (Security Service of Ukraine) to mop up the snipers from the buildings. However, in order to do that, they first had to obtain permission from the ‘Commandant of Maidan’ A. Parubiy; otherwise the Maidan protesters would start shooting the Alpha agents in the backs. A. Yakimenko requested A. Parubiy’ s consent to have the unidentified snipers mopped up from the buildings, however, A. Parubiy strongly opposed that. According to the former Chief of the SSU, the snipers who fired shots from the Philharmonics building on February 20 were there to support the assault on Interior Ministry forces, ‘whose members were already demoralised and have, in fact, fled in panic, for fear of being shot like ducks in a shooting gallery,’ Yakimenko said in an interview with Russian television. They were chased by a group of armed people. At that point, Yakimenko said, snipers started firing at the pursuers of the police themselves, and they suffered losses. All of the shots were fired from the Philharmonics building. When the first wave of shootings ended, many witnessed 20 peculiarly-dressed people leaving the building. They were carrying sniper rifle drag bags and Kalashnikov machine guns with optical sights. Yakimenko claimed that not only the law enforcers, but members of the opposition, such as ‘Freedom’, ‘Right Sector’, ‘Fatherland’, and ‘Udar’ parties witnessed it too. The snipers who had shot at people split into two groups of 10. One of the groups was lost track of by the SSU, the other one assumed a position in the Hotel “Ukraine”. The killings continued. Yakimenko also stated that, according to intelligence, the snipers could be foreigners, such as mercenaries from the former Yugoslavia, as well former Special Forces agents from Ukraine’s Defence Ministry. Moreover, he called the events in Ukraine the result of external forces (and the U.S. in particular) playing out a scenario laid out for the 2015 Presidential vote ahead of time. Yakimenko also mentioned that A. Parubiy, V. Nalivaichenko and other ‘Euromaidan’ leaders are strongly associated with U.S. secret services.
After Maidan, most of the Svoboda far right extremists re-branded themselves so as to appear "less Nazi".
There will be plenty of visuals if the Westboro Baptists have anything to say about it....
Trump told Erika Kirk to "Sue their asses off". The Westboro Baptists get rich off 1st Amendment lawsuits against their protests. They're a church consisting mainly of lawyers.
Post a Comment