I seriously doubt PragerU got permission to use this copyrighted video. Key and Peele should sue. And this isn't the "new policing according to BLM". They want the police to stop shooting UNARMED Black people. btw, the taser was never invented? The only way a cop can apprehend an uncooperative suspect is to shoot him/her?
Tasers blow up? What about those "wood shampoos" you're so fond of? Do police batons blow up too? What about pepper spray? Or is it just that you WANT the police to kill instead of subduing using non-lethal methods?
My link says Eric Garner's family received 5.9 million. It would be far cheaper for the police simply to not unnecessarily kill suspects. btw, his murder WAS unnecessary. If not they'd have received zero dollars.
The HIGH cost to the taxpayer ALONE should be enough for you to want this to stop. Apparently your hatred is so extreme the millions the police are ordered to pay to the families of people their officers have killed isn't enough to make you think maybe continuing on his way isn't a good idea.
lol! You think that what defendants receive from a settlement has something to do with what they truly deserve? LOL! Freddie Gray's family got $6.4 million and nobody did anything to him. They tried all the police officers involved and got zero convictions.
Kill enough of them and perhaps they'll stop resisting arrest. Leniency and non-lethal methods exponentially increase the number of resisters and increases the total death toll.
Your hatred is very extreme indeed. fyi, the courts decided the police departments were liable. Your relatives don't just get money if you're killed by the police. Freddie Gray was murdered. "Nobody did anything to him"? His death was ruled a homicide by the medical examiner. A homicide is "the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another". His death is yet another example of why policing and laws protecting police officers need to be reformed. Letting police off the hook for murdering people is the moral hazard.
The trial is the punishment? Who knew? I guess everyone who goes to trial is punished then. Even the ones found not guilty. Although I'd say that's more of a punishment to the families whose loved ones were murdered. It had to be the police officer who put his knee on your loved one's neck -- but it turns out your loved one was (impossibly) murdered by nobody.
What trial? The outstanding warrant(s) against Jacob Blake were vacated. There haven't been any charges filed as far as I know. Frustrating a cop is a death penalty crime? Cops who think so need to get different jobs, not take out their frustrations by murdering suspects/people they're supposed to help.
The police can't kill you even if you ask them. Which I'm sure Jacob Blake did not. I don't know what he was doing. I don't know what words were exchanged. Nor do you. In any case, the police can NOT kill someone for simply resisting. That's the law. His walking away didn't threaten anyone's life. If he was threatening anyone (with a knife) where are the charges? I heard he was handcuffed to his hospital bed because of the outstanding warrants -- and that once those were vacated the handcuffs were removed.
"...now that he'll get a multimillion lawsuit settlement".
For what? According to you the police did nothing wrong and the shooting was "righteous". btw, there is your moral hazard. Maybe that is why he tried to get away. To get shot so his family could get millions. And the reason he's so upbeat now is that he gets to live AND get the millions :)
btw, why would the gf get any money? The warrants were vacated. Also (as far as I know) she isn't the mother of any of his children.
Democrat mayors are stupid. They'll pay for all kinds of damages a Republican would never stand for. We'd rather pay defense lawyers than settlement. "Not one penny for tribute!"
"why would the gf get any money?" She can now sue him for "digital penetration" damages, and actually win a bankroll.
The warrants were vacated. Must not have been anything to them. Maybe he should sue her for defamation. btw, money is paid to the families of people killed by the police as a result of a lawsuit. No money has ever been handed over as a "tribute".
The jury in the civil trial thought he did it. Hence the $70 million judgement. Why the families of people murdered by the police get large settlements. It's an admission of guilt.
35 comments:
Comedian Keegan-Michael Key linked up with Biden at a chicken and waffles spot in Los Angeles and said, "I'm all for Joe. Vote for Joe".
I seriously doubt PragerU got permission to use this copyrighted video. Key and Peele should sue. And this isn't the "new policing according to BLM". They want the police to stop shooting UNARMED Black people. btw, the taser was never invented? The only way a cop can apprehend an uncooperative suspect is to shoot him/her?
Tasers often fail to stop certain idiots like Jacob Blake, and when they do, kaboom, KABOOM! :)
...but you'll just blame the cops, regardless.
Tasers blow up? What about those "wood shampoos" you're so fond of? Do police batons blow up too? What about pepper spray? Or is it just that you WANT the police to kill instead of subduing using non-lethal methods?
Saves a lawsuit.
Families don't sue when the police kill their loved ones? Who knew?
There's no lifetime disability medical bills... much cheaper.
My link says Eric Garner's family received 5.9 million. It would be far cheaper for the police simply to not unnecessarily kill suspects. btw, his murder WAS unnecessary. If not they'd have received zero dollars.
The HIGH cost to the taxpayer ALONE should be enough for you to want this to stop. Apparently your hatred is so extreme the millions the police are ordered to pay to the families of people their officers have killed isn't enough to make you think maybe continuing on his way isn't a good idea.
lol! You think that what defendants receive from a settlement has something to do with what they truly deserve? LOL! Freddie Gray's family got $6.4 million and nobody did anything to him. They tried all the police officers involved and got zero convictions.
Kill enough of them and perhaps they'll stop resisting arrest. Leniency and non-lethal methods exponentially increase the number of resisters and increases the total death toll.
Requiring police to employ non-lethal methods is a moral hazard.
Your hatred is very extreme indeed. fyi, the courts decided the police departments were liable. Your relatives don't just get money if you're killed by the police. Freddie Gray was murdered. "Nobody did anything to him"? His death was ruled a homicide by the medical examiner. A homicide is "the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another". His death is yet another example of why policing and laws protecting police officers need to be reformed. Letting police off the hook for murdering people is the moral hazard.
lol! Bringing police officers to trial was "letting them off the hook"? Who knew?
The trial is the punishment? Who knew? I guess everyone who goes to trial is punished then. Even the ones found not guilty. Although I'd say that's more of a punishment to the families whose loved ones were murdered. It had to be the police officer who put his knee on your loved one's neck -- but it turns out your loved one was (impossibly) murdered by nobody.
"Sentence first, trial later!" screamed the Red Dervy.
That's what you want. And you want the sentence to be death.
...only for those who refuse trial. :)
What trial? The outstanding warrant(s) against Jacob Blake were vacated. There haven't been any charges filed as far as I know. Frustrating a cop is a death penalty crime? Cops who think so need to get different jobs, not take out their frustrations by murdering suspects/people they're supposed to help.
Jacob Blake didn't resist? lol! He voluntarily chose the DEATH PENALTY! I know, what a maroon!
The police can't kill you even if you ask them. Which I'm sure Jacob Blake did not. I don't know what he was doing. I don't know what words were exchanged. Nor do you. In any case, the police can NOT kill someone for simply resisting. That's the law. His walking away didn't threaten anyone's life. If he was threatening anyone (with a knife) where are the charges? I heard he was handcuffed to his hospital bed because of the outstanding warrants -- and that once those were vacated the handcuffs were removed.
You mean that the warrants were active when he was shot? lol!
Charges?
The girlfriend is pressing now that he'll get a multimillion lawsuit settlement? lol!
"...now that he'll get a multimillion lawsuit settlement".
For what? According to you the police did nothing wrong and the shooting was "righteous". btw, there is your moral hazard. Maybe that is why he tried to get away. To get shot so his family could get millions. And the reason he's so upbeat now is that he gets to live AND get the millions :)
btw, why would the gf get any money? The warrants were vacated. Also (as far as I know) she isn't the mother of any of his children.
Democrat mayors are stupid. They'll pay for all kinds of damages a Republican would never stand for. We'd rather pay defense lawyers than settlement. "Not one penny for tribute!"
"why would the gf get any money?" She can now sue him for "digital penetration" damages, and actually win a bankroll.
The warrants were vacated. Must not have been anything to them. Maybe he should sue her for defamation. btw, money is paid to the families of people killed by the police as a result of a lawsuit. No money has ever been handed over as a "tribute".
Civil charges aren't criminal, by definition.
I didn't say they were. Ron Goldman's father probably won his lawsuit against OJ because the judge and jury thought OJ didn't do it.
lol! What the judge thought, or didn't think, was immaterial.
The jury awarded the Goldman family $70 million.
...and Judge Ito let him walk free...
What judge Ito thought, or didn't think, was immaterial.
Exactly. :)
The jury in the civil trial thought he did it. Hence the $70 million judgement. Why the families of people murdered by the police get large settlements. It's an admission of guilt.
Post a Comment