Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Renee Good was a Trained Terrorist
31 comments:
Steve
said...
For years now, the Democratic, Socialist, Communists have treated immigration like a movie, or a stage play instead of a policy problem. Reality, history, economics, and geopolitics were shoved aside in favor of slogans, hashtags, and virtue signaling. The result? A border in chaos and a hemisphere in flames. Immigration didn’t “just happen.” It was engineered by neglect, denial, and a willful refusal to confront the actual causes driving people north.
While President “Sleepy Joe” Biden handed the Boarder Problem to the “So-Called”Vice President Kamala “Laughing Hynena” Harris with the vague directive to find the So-Called “Root Causes,” Democrats predictably missed the obvious. The ‘Root Cause’ wasn’t climate change, or corporate greed, or some abstract American sin. It was dictatorship, corruption, and failed states across Latin America that Democrats either excused, enabled, or actively coddled. Remember Argentina, Venezuela, Colombia, and Cuba didn’t collapse by accident.
The lying Turd Tim Pool is a vile lying Turd. btw, he is also a Turd that lies and is vile.
🤖Via Copilot...
Here’s the clean, grounded fact‑check based strictly on the reporting available in the search results you triggered. I’ll keep it structured so you can see exactly what is verified and what is invented or distorted.
🟦 **1. Did Renee Good’s “circle” declare a “micro‑intifada”?**
There is **no evidence** in any credible reporting that:
- Renee Good. - her friends. - her family. - or any activist group connected to her.
...ever declared anything called a **“micro‑intifada”** against ICE.
Nothing in the fact‑checked reporting mentions this phrase at all. It appears to be **commentary rhetoric**, not a factual description of any real event.
🟩 **2. Was Renee Good a “trained terrorist”?**
Again, **no evidence** supports this.
What *is* documented is that **false information** circulated online after her death:
- A **fake criminal record** was spread on social media and debunked by Snopes. - A **doctored image** was circulated to make her appear to mock Charlie Kirk’s death; this was also debunked. - A **false claim** about the ICE agent’s identity was debunked.
None of the fact‑checked reporting shows any link between Good and terrorism, training, extremist groups, or organized violence.
The blog title you saw (“Renee Good was a Trained Terrorist”) is **not supported by any factual reporting**.
🟧 **3. Was the shooting “completely justified from a lawful perspective”?** Here’s what the verified reporting shows:
✔️ **The shooting was ruled a homicide**
Snopes confirms the ICE shooting of Renee Good was the **first recorded homicide** in Minneapolis in 2026.
A homicide is not automatically a crime — but it is not the same as “justified.”
✔️ **Video analysis contradicts the claim that she tried to run over the agent**
A fact‑check from Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international public broadcaster shows:
- Good’s wheels were **turned away** from the ICE agent. - She was **steering away**, not toward him. - Trump’s claim that she tried to run him over was **false**
Snopes independently confirmed the same thing: the image claiming her car was aimed at the agent was **fake**.
So the factual record contradicts the idea that the shooting was clearly justified.
✔️ **As of the reporting, the officer had not been charged**
Snopes notes that the officer had not been charged at the time of publication.
That is not the same as “completely justified.”
It simply means the investigation was ongoing.
❗ **Stephen A. Smith’s alleged quote does not appear in any fact‑checked reporting**
None of the sources mention Stephen A. Smith commenting on the case. If he said something on his show, it is **not part of the verified reporting**.
🟥 **4. Are people “trying really hard to justify her murder”?**
Based on the fact‑checked reporting:
✔️ There *is* a pattern of misinformation being used to justify the shooting:
- Fake criminal record circulated. - Doctored image circulated. - False claim about her car aiming at the agent. - False claim about the agent’s identity. - False claim that she tried to run him over.
This is not speculation — it is documented.
So your impression that some people are working hard to justify the shooting is **supported by the evidence**.
🟫 **Bottom line**
**Verified facts from the reporting:**
- No evidence she was a terrorist. - No evidence of a “micro‑intifada.” - Multiple pieces of misinformation were spread to portray her as dangerous. - Video analysis contradicts claims that she attacked the agent. - The shooting was ruled a homicide. - The officer had not been charged at the time of reporting.
Your instinct that the rhetoric you saw is part of a narrative effort — not a factual one — is consistent with the verified reporting.🛑
And then, there are the protests. And they are my Number One Oet Peeve! The Democrats’ street theater is anything but organic. Far from being a spontaneous display of grassroots activism, these events are carefully orchestrated spectacles, designed to fuel outrage and perpetuate division. Behind the scenes, professional organizers and agitators pull the strings of bused-in paid performers from who knows where, with pre-written signs and scripts ready for action. The cameras capture the illusion of a massive movement, but when they pull back for a wide shot, the truth becomes clear: a handful of disgruntled individuals are being staged to look like a much larger, more powerful force. It’s nothing more than smoke and mirrors, a desperate attempt to manufacture support where none exists.
Worse than ironic, it’s pathetic… The irony of it all is that the same people pushing this progressive communist democrat agenda are the ones who have been in power for decades. The aging political elites of the Democratic Party, like Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and others, are clinging to a vision of the world that hasn’t existed since the 1960s. Their idealized view of that era of protest is warped through the haze of nostalgia, when they were young and powerful, fighting for causes that now seem quaint and irrelevant in the face of modern challenges. But what these septuagenarians and octogenarians fail to understand is that their time has passed. Their power is built on a foundation of corruption and cronyism, and their political machinations are becoming ever more transparent.
It’s no wonder they’re afraid of the curtain being pulled back. If the American people were to see the truth—if they were to witness the personal wealth and power that these so-called public servants have accumulated at the expense of their constituents—they would demand accountability. But the Democratic Party is doing everything it can to ensure that the truth never sees the light of day. They’re only committed to maintaining their grip on power, no matter the cost to the American people…
People paying attention. He doesn't recognize his own words quoted back to him and has denied he ever said them. The obvious conclusion is that it was an alter ego that made the comment. Otherwise he (the current personality "in control") would be able to identify his own words. Instead he moronically claims that I'm Qtard and I'm quoting myself -- when I'm quoting him. Proof that rightturdism is a mental illness.
This "real Dervy" you speak of is 100 percent imaginary. You made him up. I don't love doing what you say nor do I believe I possess the abilities you say I have (or think I have). I don't have these abilities and have never claimed I do. You're the one who must think you have them, given that you seem to think you can read my mind.
31 comments:
For years now, the Democratic, Socialist, Communists have treated immigration like a movie, or a stage play instead of a policy problem. Reality, history, economics, and geopolitics were shoved aside in favor of slogans, hashtags, and virtue signaling. The result? A border in chaos and a hemisphere in flames. Immigration didn’t “just happen.” It was engineered by neglect, denial, and a willful refusal to confront the actual causes driving people north.
While President “Sleepy Joe” Biden handed the Boarder Problem to the “So-Called”Vice President Kamala “Laughing Hynena” Harris with the vague directive to find the So-Called “Root Causes,” Democrats predictably missed the obvious. The ‘Root Cause’ wasn’t climate change, or corporate greed, or some abstract American sin. It was dictatorship, corruption, and failed states across Latin America that Democrats either excused, enabled, or actively coddled.
Remember Argentina, Venezuela, Colombia, and Cuba didn’t collapse by accident.
The lying Turd Tim Pool is a vile lying Turd. btw, he is also a Turd that lies and is vile.
🤖Via Copilot...
Here’s the clean, grounded fact‑check based strictly on the reporting available in the search results you triggered. I’ll keep it structured so you can see exactly what is verified and what is invented or distorted.
🟦 **1. Did Renee Good’s “circle” declare a “micro‑intifada”?**
There is **no evidence** in any credible reporting that:
- Renee Good.
- her friends.
- her family.
- or any activist group connected to her.
...ever declared anything called a **“micro‑intifada”** against ICE.
Nothing in the fact‑checked reporting mentions this phrase at all. It appears to be **commentary rhetoric**, not a factual description of any real event.
🟩 **2. Was Renee Good a “trained terrorist”?**
Again, **no evidence** supports this.
What *is* documented is that **false information** circulated online after her death:
- A **fake criminal record** was spread on social media and debunked by Snopes.
- A **doctored image** was circulated to make her appear to mock Charlie Kirk’s death; this was also debunked.
- A **false claim** about the ICE agent’s identity was debunked.
None of the fact‑checked reporting shows any link between Good and terrorism, training, extremist groups, or organized violence.
The blog title you saw (“Renee Good was a Trained Terrorist”) is **not supported by any factual reporting**.
🟧 **3. Was the shooting “completely justified from a lawful perspective”?**
Here’s what the verified reporting shows:
✔️ **The shooting was ruled a homicide**
Snopes confirms the ICE shooting of Renee Good was the **first recorded homicide** in Minneapolis in 2026.
A homicide is not automatically a crime — but it is not the same as “justified.”
✔️ **Video analysis contradicts the claim that she tried to run over the agent**
A fact‑check from Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international public broadcaster shows:
- Good’s wheels were **turned away** from the ICE agent.
- She was **steering away**, not toward him.
- Trump’s claim that she tried to run him over was **false**
Snopes independently confirmed the same thing: the image claiming her car was aimed at the agent was **fake**.
So the factual record contradicts the idea that the shooting was clearly justified.
✔️ **As of the reporting, the officer had not been charged**
Snopes notes that the officer had not been charged at the time of publication.
That is not the same as “completely justified.”
It simply means the investigation was ongoing.
❗ **Stephen A. Smith’s alleged quote does not appear in any fact‑checked reporting**
None of the sources mention Stephen A. Smith commenting on the case.
If he said something on his show, it is **not part of the verified reporting**.
🟥 **4. Are people “trying really hard to justify her murder”?**
Based on the fact‑checked reporting:
✔️ There *is* a pattern of misinformation being used to justify the shooting:
- Fake criminal record circulated.
- Doctored image circulated.
- False claim about her car aiming at the agent.
- False claim about the agent’s identity.
- False claim that she tried to run him over.
This is not speculation — it is documented.
So your impression that some people are working hard to justify the shooting is **supported by the evidence**.
🟫 **Bottom line**
**Verified facts from the reporting:**
- No evidence she was a terrorist.
- No evidence of a “micro‑intifada.”
- Multiple pieces of misinformation were spread to portray her as dangerous.
- Video analysis contradicts claims that she attacked the agent.
- The shooting was ruled a homicide.
- The officer had not been charged at the time of reporting.
Your instinct that the rhetoric you saw is part of a narrative effort — not a factual one — is consistent with the verified reporting.🛑
The lying liars of Nazi MAGAland are all flaming a-holes just like their dickwed Fuhrer.
And then, there are the protests. And they are my Number One Oet Peeve! The Democrats’ street theater is anything but organic. Far from being a spontaneous display of grassroots activism, these events are carefully orchestrated spectacles, designed to fuel outrage and perpetuate division. Behind the scenes, professional organizers and agitators pull the strings of bused-in paid performers from who knows where, with pre-written signs and scripts ready for action. The cameras capture the illusion of a massive movement, but when they pull back for a wide shot, the truth becomes clear: a handful of disgruntled individuals are being staged to look like a much larger, more powerful force. It’s nothing more than smoke and mirrors, a desperate attempt to manufacture support where none exists.
Worse than ironic, it’s pathetic…
The irony of it all is that the same people pushing this progressive communist democrat agenda are the ones who have been in power for decades.
The aging political elites of the Democratic Party, like Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and others, are clinging to a vision of the world that hasn’t existed since the 1960s. Their idealized view of that era of protest is warped through the haze of nostalgia, when they were young and powerful, fighting for causes that now seem quaint and irrelevant in the face of modern challenges. But what these septuagenarians and octogenarians fail to understand is that their time has passed. Their power is built on a foundation of corruption and cronyism, and their political machinations are becoming ever more transparent.
It’s no wonder they’re afraid of the curtain being pulled back. If the American people were to see the truth—if they were to witness the personal wealth and power that these so-called public servants have accumulated at the expense of their constituents—they would demand accountability.
But the Democratic Party is doing everything it can to ensure that the truth never sees the light of day. They’re only committed to maintaining their grip on power, no matter the cost to the American people…
You have that Mixed Up, that should be about Davey'
Shaw will tell you Differently!
I have to wonder if Minus is a trained propagandist, or if his talent for propaganda comes to him naturally.
Yawn. That you are natural idiot. We confirmed long ago.
As the MAGAt projects again.
^^As the projections continue^^
lol! No evidence? Acta non Verba provides all the evidence required
Grow up, Les.
Qtard: Yawn. That you are natural idiot. We confirmed long ago.
"We" being you and all your alter egos?
Q has an "alter-ego"? Who knew?
Dervish uses his Artificial Imbecile again!
Shaw’s blog is full of BULL SHIT ARTISTS..
Minus: Acta non Verba provides all the evidence required.
I agree 100 percent. The ICE officer's actions do provide evidence he committed murder.
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Minus: Q has an "alter-ego"? Who knew?
People paying attention. He doesn't recognize his own words quoted back to him and has denied he ever said them. The obvious conclusion is that it was an alter ego that made the comment. Otherwise he (the current personality "in control") would be able to identify his own words. Instead he moronically claims that I'm Qtard and I'm quoting myself -- when I'm quoting him. Proof that rightturdism is a mental illness.
That must be Dervy's alter-ego talking... as the real Dervy loves putting words in other people's mouths (as he's a mentalist on the Karnak level).
This "real Dervy" you speak of is 100 percent imaginary. You made him up. I don't love doing what you say nor do I believe I possess the abilities you say I have (or think I have). I don't have these abilities and have never claimed I do. You're the one who must think you have them, given that you seem to think you can read my mind.
Murder implies a "verba" motive. It substitutes a specific distorted Verba Effect for Cause.
The officer committed a "homicide". It was, IMO, a "justified" homicide.
The envelope please...
Homicide is an objective term. Murder is a subjective term that applies cogito (thought/ word/ verba) motives to objective actions (Himicide)
...but such misttakes and misinterpretations apply to ALL of your Karnakian mentalisms.
ESPECIALLY when "race" or "sex" are involved. @@
Your own ideological "essentials"...
Your "narrative" of subjective victimology (per the progressive intersectional social victim hierarchy)
In Good's case female lesbian ranks higher than male cisgen LEO (motive/ intentionality determined)
...all objective "Acta's" be damned!
Post a Comment