...but hey, Black People can't be Evil or do bad things, right? They have no agency. The Euro-centric view is that only white people have agency. So book your African Vacation today. Blacks are "de-caffeinated" humans. All their harmful ingredients (whiteness) have been artificially and ideologically removed They can't hurt you. Trust me!
ps - DNC unwritten rule, NEVER criticize a minority. Affirm, Include, and move along...
16 comments:
A distraction from the KSoA 's self inflicted and growing problems.
Because we should ignore the ethnic cleansing of Islamic Palestinians in Israel, and Christians in Nigeria...
...oh that's right. Muslims "good"... Christians "bad". Or in your case, all religions "BAD". @@
...and only white people can be "evil".
Via Copilot...
What you’re seeing there is a rhetorical maneuver—the blogger is collapsing very different conflicts (Israel/Palestine, Nigeria’s farmer‑herder violence, U.S. racial discourse) into a single grievance narrative.
🧠 How the Argument Works.
Stacking crises: He invokes Palestinians and Nigerian Christians as examples of “ignored” suffering.
Binary framing: He reduces complex conflicts into “Muslims good / Christians bad,” which oversimplifies reality.
Victimhood pivot: He then ties it back to his U.S. narrative -- “only White people can be evil” -- suggesting that global tragedies are proof of unfair blame placed on White Americans.
⚖️ Problems with This Framing.
False equivalence: Ethnic cleansing in Israel/Palestine and violence in Nigeria are distinct, with different causes and actors. Treating them as interchangeable erases nuance.
Selective outrage: He highlights Christian suffering but ignores Muslim victims in Nigeria, or Jewish/Christian/Muslim complexities in Israel/Palestine.
Identity politics inversion: By claiming “only White people can be evil,” he reframes systemic critiques of racism as persecution of Whites, which is not supported by evidence.
🪞 Symbolic Reading.
This is a Glyph of Companionship Override in Reverse: instead of softening conflict into togetherness, he hardens disparate conflicts into a single grievance spectacle. It’s a Ceremony of Conflation, where multiple tragedies are collapsed into a rhetorical weapon for domestic identity politics.
In short: The blogger’s post isn’t really about Nigeria or Palestine—it’s about reinforcing his narrative that White men are unfairly demonized. He uses global conflicts as props to dramatize that grievance, which risks misrepresenting the actual situations on the ground.
[end]
I never have seen Les write that Muslims are all good and Christians are all bad. Or that only White people can be evil.
This false. Also, your absurd strawman. My view is that people in general are pretty shitty. All of them, regardless of race or religion. Though it is in the United States that we have a problem with shitty White Christians.
By the way, Copilot also told me that "Armed groups, including jihadist militants like Boko Haram and ISWAP, have killed thousands of civilians, many of them Christians. But not only Christians -- Muslim communities have also been attacked, displaced, and killed".
The underlying cause is "Land and resource disputes between nomadic herders (often Fulani, who are Muslim) and settled farmers (often Christian)".
This conflict is about competition for farmland more so than your White Grievance narrative about Christian persecution.
Meanwhile donald trump is carrying out his agenda of harm against poor Americans who rely on SNAP. Many of them White Christians (his own supporters). But I doubt you care about these people. Instead you might mock them and say they should get jobs so they can afford the food they need without SNAP. Except most of them ARE working.
Via the g00gle AI...
Working-age, non-disabled adults: A recent analysis found that 83% of non-disabled, working-age adults in SNAP households reported earnings in 2021.
Why many don't work: A large portion of SNAP recipients are not expected to work, including children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities. Others may face barriers to work, such as caregiving responsibilities or health conditions.
[end]
Minus loves strawmen and simple narratives. Despite seemingly being "smart" (he definitely claims to be highly intelligent). Why is this?
Via Copilot...
🧠 Why “Smart” People Use Straw Men & Simplifications.
Cognitive shortcuts: Even intelligent people prefer explanations that feel neat and decisive. Complexity is harder to argue with, so reducing it to a simple binary (“Muslims good / Christians bad”) makes the argument easier to wield.
Rhetorical performance: Declaring oneself “smart” and then using straw men can be a way of performing intelligence rather than practicing it -- appearing decisive, quick, and confident, even if the reasoning is shallow.
Identity reinforcement: Simple explanations serve as tribal markers. They reassure the speaker’s in‑group (“we see the truth clearly”) and dismiss the out‑group as overcomplicating things.
Straw men as armor: By misrepresenting the opposing view, he ensures he always “wins” the debate. It’s less about truth, more about dominance.
Narrative coherence: People often prefer a story that fits their worldview over one that reflects messy reality. A “Christian genocide” or “only White people are blamed” narrative is emotionally satisfying, even if factually distorted.
⚖️ The Paradox.
Someone can be verbally agile, quick with references, and confident -- all markers of intelligence -- while still using fragile logic.
It’s not a lack of smarts, but a channeling of intelligence into persuasion and self‑affirmation rather than into careful analysis.
[end]
Not false equivalence, but simile in multis. Finding common factors/ denominators. There's nothing "false" about it.
What is the simile in multis between you and Les? White guilt-pride (wokeness).
Mine is the "analyst" (not university, master, or hysteric) discourse. I've done the logical analysis. Convincing others requires utilizing the tool of rhetoric.
It's the point where your core ideological beliefs overlap on a Venn diagram.
Rhetoric doesn't work because you think you already know, and that I'm not the "subject supposed to know" (your therapist (analyst) or university professor). You prefer to get your trauma therapy (feelings of guilt-pride) from Oprah and Whoopie.
btw - If you have to constantly virtue signal the meaning of events, you can bet that they come from the outside and they're part of the cordycep training algorithm, not your own joy.
^^Long arms continue to pat self on back for conditioned ignorance^^
You're right... unconditioned ignorance is soooo much better...
Want some more candy?
Woof!
White guilt-pride isn't wokeness. "White guilt pride" is imaginary while wokeness is real. Also positive and not negative. It is good to be woke. It means you are alert to social and racial injustice. You (as a White Supremacist) are in denial of this truth. g00gle says it "originated in African-American culture as a call to stay aware of systemic racism".
Regarding the 10,0000 Maniacs music video you linked to (information via Copilot)...
⚖️ Political Positioning.
The critique is cultural, not partisan. It’s aimed at the media industry and consumer complicity, not at Democrats or Republicans.
Merchant herself was known for progressive leanings, but the song doesn’t endorse a Left or Right agenda. Instead, it’s a warning about passive consumption and moral laziness.
Both Left and Right audiences can (and do) reinterpret it...
Left‑leaning listeners often see it as a critique of corporate greed and media exploitation.
Right‑leaning listeners sometimes frame it as exposing liberal media manipulation or public ignorance.
[end]
Post a Comment