Harris’s strongest support by far came among Black voters, where she received 83% of the vote compared to 16% for Trump. Overall however, Harris underperformed compared to President Joe Biden during the 2020 election, where he received 91% of the vote from Black men and women compared to 8% for Trump.
In particular, Trump performed better among Black men, where he received 24% support versus 9% of the vote among Black women, according to AP VoteCast.
Minus: In particular, Trump performed better among Black men, where he received 24% support versus 9% of the vote among Black women...
Exactly. You confirm what I wrote. It was misogynist Black men that would not vote for a woman.
Minus: They're no longer buying the "white supremacy" argument. In fact, they're now laughing at it.
You asked every Black man that voted for d0n0ld? I'm sure there are some who are laughing -- due to stupidity/not being able to see the obvious fact that d0n0ld is a White Supremacist. A fact that is acknowledged by most (I would confidently guess) of the 84 percent of Black men that voted for Harris.
Though I'm sure you'd argue that they might not have wanted to vote for a woman and/or believed that d0n0ld is a White Supremacist, but only wanted "free stuff". Which proves my point. You aren't able to read the minds of the Black men who voted for d0n0ld and "know" they are all laughing.
It's always someone else's fault for not voting correctly. It's never a defective candidate. Thank the gods we've reached the end of the post-progressive political era... and all their ideologically driven neoracist pogroms.
...a return to "Materialist" luxury values like gold and jumbo jets, instead off crippling religions and secular ideologies that simply antagonize otherwise good and innocent people.
...leading to what Hesiod would term "harsh Strife' instead of the good kind that pits Commercial interests against one another to the "profit" of the end consumer. (Works & Days + Plato's "Hipparchus")
Minus: ...crippling religions and secular ideologies that simply antagonize otherwise good and innocent people...
The evangelicals aren't with tRump any longer? Have they finally realized that donald trump is an incredibly evil man?
Copilot: The framing of Trump’s presidency as a return to "Materialist luxury values" like gold and jumbo jets seems to contrast sharply with the reality of deep cuts to healthcare and social programs. If anything, the budget prioritizes military spending and tax cuts, while reducing funding for health equity initiatives and public outreach programs.
Your point about Trump antagonizing vulnerable populations is particularly relevant when considering how these cuts could affect low-income seniors and disabled individuals who rely on Medicare. While the administration insists it’s targeting "fraud, waste, and abuse," experts warn that such reductions could undermine essential healthcare services.
It’s interesting how different factions interpret Trump’s policies -- some see them as a return to prosperity, while others view them as a direct attack on social safety nets. [end]
Minus: **blah, blah, blah** Works & Days + Plato's "Hipparchus"...
Copilot: Plato’s Hipparchus ... explores themes of wealth, virtue, and deception, though it doesn’t directly reference Hesiod’s concept of Strife. The connection being drawn here seems to suggest that progressive policies create destructive conflict, rather than the healthy competition that benefits consumers.
However, this interpretation depends on how one defines "progressive policies" -- many argue that regulations and social programs prevent exploitation rather than stifle competition. [end]
DEI quotas for hiring and medical research. DEI quotas for vaccine and medical services distribution. Sounds like a pretty righteous place to begin cutting...
"fraud, waste, and abuse," experts warn that such reductions could undermine essential healthcare services.
Taxpayers warn that without such reductions, governmental fiscal solvency can be undermined rendering all essential public healthcare services non-existent.
Copilot: There’s strong evidence that national healthcare systems contribute to better overall public health, which can lead to long-term economic benefits. Countries with universal healthcare tend to see:
Lower healthcare costs per capita, since preventative care reduces expensive emergency treatments.
Higher workforce productivity, as fewer people suffer from untreated chronic conditions.
Reduced financial strain on businesses, since they don’t have to provide private insurance.
Greater economic mobility, as individuals aren’t burdened by overwhelming medical debt. [end]
Quotas are for addressing the wrong of underrepresentation in medical professions and research. Health care systems should be concerned with the health of ALL citizens of a nation and not only the White Male citizens.
That what has happened is that guilt-pride morality was applied to government funding, and that is very foolish = very imaginary.
Striving for diversity has nothing to do with "guilt". White Supremacy is very foolish.
The idea that "diversity is strength" refers to the idea that a variety of different individuals, perspectives, experiences, and ideas can lead to a more robust and effective outcome, whether in a workplace, community, or nation. This strength stems from the increased opportunity for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving that a diverse group can offer.
Wealth is the leading cause of America's health care crisis.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prevalence of obesity among adults (aged 20 and older) in the United States was 40.3% in 2021-2023.
This means that approximately 100 million adults in the United States are obese.
Free health care wouldn't solve this "health care' problem. It would only "enable" it and make it more pronounced. Every dollar citizens spend on health care is a dollar less spent on fatty snacks, cigarettes and booze.
No Dervy, the taxpayers have no interest in subsidizing your pathological bad choices that lead to AIDS, STDs, and obesity. The Democratic Party has created enough moral hazards for otherwise intelligent, yet unsuspecting Americans.
I don't think that the luxury values elite will give up their private jets and fly commercial to Davos next year, Derv. THAT is how they are committed to "saving the Earth" for us peons.
The Royal Society: Arctic summer sea ice cover has shrunk dramatically. The heat content of the ocean has increased. Global average sea level has risen by approximately 16 cm (6 inches) since 1901, due both to the expansion of warmer ocean water and to the addition of melt waters from glaciers and ice sheets on land. (the Royal Society is the United Kingdom’s national academy of sciences, founded in 1660, making it one of the oldest scientific institutions in the world).
Copilot: That’s a dramatic way to frame the argument [drowned polar bear corpses], but it ignores the actual evidence of climate change’s impact on polar bears. Scientists have documented declining polar bear populations, particularly in regions like Hudson Bay, where numbers have dropped by 50% since the mid-1990s due to melting sea ice.
Polar bears rely on sea ice to hunt seals, and as the ice disappears, they are forced to swim longer distances or spend more time on land, leading to starvation and population decline. While it’s unlikely that drowned polar bears would be widely visible -- since bodies sink or are scavenged --researchers have observed weakened, starving bears struggling to survive. [end]
27 comments:
Sowell makes some valid points, but his framing is dishonest. trumper White Supremacy isn't "distant", it is happening RIGHT NOW.
Says the blind moonbat Profit of Satan Dervish Z Sanders.
...can I clap for you Tinkerbell, and help keep the DNC raison d'etre of racism alive?
d0n0ld is keeping the White Supremacist raison d'etre of racism alive.
fyi, I am a sighted person, Mystere. Also, I am not a "prophet of Satan". You're thinking of Turds like Robin Bullock, Amanda Grace, Mark Taylor, etc.
Exactly. That's why minorities are abandoning the Democratic Party in droves to vote for Trump.
Exactly? So you acknowledge the fact that Donald John Trump is a racist?
"Droves" = A small number of misogynist Black men.
As per the article you linked to, "Trump’s share of Black voters rose slightly, driven largely by younger men".
Harris’s strongest support by far came among Black voters, where she received 83% of the vote compared to 16% for Trump. Overall however, Harris underperformed compared to President Joe Biden during the 2020 election, where he received 91% of the vote from Black men and women compared to 8% for Trump.
In particular, Trump performed better among Black men, where he received 24% support versus 9% of the vote among Black women, according to AP VoteCast.
Droves = 2x as many. 8% vs 16%
They're no longer buying the "white supremacy" argument. In fact, they're now laughing at it.
Minus: In particular, Trump performed better among Black men, where he received 24% support versus 9% of the vote among Black women...
Exactly. You confirm what I wrote. It was misogynist Black men that would not vote for a woman.
Minus: They're no longer buying the "white supremacy" argument. In fact, they're now laughing at it.
You asked every Black man that voted for d0n0ld? I'm sure there are some who are laughing -- due to stupidity/not being able to see the obvious fact that d0n0ld is a White Supremacist. A fact that is acknowledged by most (I would confidently guess) of the 84 percent of Black men that voted for Harris.
Though I'm sure you'd argue that they might not have wanted to vote for a woman and/or believed that d0n0ld is a White Supremacist, but only wanted "free stuff". Which proves my point. You aren't able to read the minds of the Black men who voted for d0n0ld and "know" they are all laughing.
It's always someone else's fault for not voting correctly. It's never a defective candidate. Thank the gods we've reached the end of the post-progressive political era... and all their ideologically driven neoracist pogroms.
...a return to "Materialist" luxury values like gold and jumbo jets, instead off crippling religions and secular ideologies that simply antagonize otherwise good and innocent people.
...leading to what Hesiod would term "harsh Strife' instead of the good kind that pits Commercial interests against one another to the "profit" of the end consumer. (Works & Days + Plato's "Hipparchus")
Minus: ...crippling religions and secular ideologies that simply antagonize otherwise good and innocent people...
The evangelicals aren't with tRump any longer? Have they finally realized that donald trump is an incredibly evil man?
Copilot: The framing of Trump’s presidency as a return to "Materialist luxury values" like gold and jumbo jets seems to contrast sharply with the reality of deep cuts to healthcare and social programs. If anything, the budget prioritizes military spending and tax cuts, while reducing funding for health equity initiatives and public outreach programs.
Your point about Trump antagonizing vulnerable populations is particularly relevant when considering how these cuts could affect low-income seniors and disabled individuals who rely on Medicare. While the administration insists it’s targeting "fraud, waste, and abuse," experts warn that such reductions could undermine essential healthcare services.
It’s interesting how different factions interpret Trump’s policies -- some see them as a return to prosperity, while others view them as a direct attack on social safety nets. [end]
Minus: **blah, blah, blah** Works & Days + Plato's "Hipparchus"...
Copilot: Plato’s Hipparchus ... explores themes of wealth, virtue, and deception, though it doesn’t directly reference Hesiod’s concept of Strife. The connection being drawn here seems to suggest that progressive policies create destructive conflict, rather than the healthy competition that benefits consumers.
However, this interpretation depends on how one defines "progressive policies" -- many argue that regulations and social programs prevent exploitation rather than stifle competition. [end]
health equity initiatives
DEI quotas for hiring and medical research. DEI quotas for vaccine and medical services distribution. Sounds like a pretty righteous place to begin cutting...
Applying guilt-pride morality to government funding and programs is very foolish.
"fraud, waste, and abuse," experts warn that such reductions could undermine essential healthcare services.
Taxpayers warn that without such reductions, governmental fiscal solvency can be undermined rendering all essential public healthcare services non-existent.
Copilot: There’s strong evidence that national healthcare systems contribute to better overall public health, which can lead to long-term economic benefits. Countries with universal healthcare tend to see:
Lower healthcare costs per capita, since preventative care reduces expensive emergency treatments.
Higher workforce productivity, as fewer people suffer from untreated chronic conditions.
Reduced financial strain on businesses, since they don’t have to provide private insurance.
Greater economic mobility, as individuals aren’t burdened by overwhelming medical debt. [end]
Quotas are for addressing the wrong of underrepresentation in medical professions and research. Health care systems should be concerned with the health of ALL citizens of a nation and not only the White Male citizens.
That what has happened is that guilt-pride morality was applied to government funding, and that is very foolish = very imaginary.
Striving for diversity has nothing to do with "guilt". White Supremacy is very foolish.
The idea that "diversity is strength" refers to the idea that a variety of different individuals, perspectives, experiences, and ideas can lead to a more robust and effective outcome, whether in a workplace, community, or nation. This strength stems from the increased opportunity for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving that a diverse group can offer.
aka everything White Supremacy is opposed to.
Wealth is the leading cause of America's health care crisis.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prevalence of obesity among adults (aged 20 and older) in the United States was 40.3% in 2021-2023.
This means that approximately 100 million adults in the United States are obese.
Free health care wouldn't solve this "health care' problem. It would only "enable" it and make it more pronounced. Every dollar citizens spend on health care is a dollar less spent on fatty snacks, cigarettes and booze.
No Dervy, the taxpayers have no interest in subsidizing your pathological bad choices that lead to AIDS, STDs, and obesity. The Democratic Party has created enough moral hazards for otherwise intelligent, yet unsuspecting Americans.
White supremacy isn't a problem. Elite luxury values are.
The "luxury value" of trying to keep the earth hospitable for human life. Which will bigly impact the non elites much more than the elites.
Means... "elite luxury values" = BS framing.
I don't think that the luxury values elite will give up their private jets and fly commercial to Davos next year, Derv. THAT is how they are committed to "saving the Earth" for us peons.
"Climate Change" = "Steaming pile of BS" framing
Minus: "Climate Change" = "Steaming pile of BS" framing.
That's only because, to you, verifiable facts are BS.
So where's the verification? Where are the corpses of all the drowned polar bears?
The Royal Society: Arctic summer sea ice cover has shrunk dramatically. The heat content of the ocean has increased. Global average sea level has risen by approximately 16 cm (6 inches) since 1901, due both to the expansion of warmer ocean water and to the addition of melt waters from glaciers and ice sheets on land. (the Royal Society is the United Kingdom’s national academy of sciences, founded in 1660, making it one of the oldest scientific institutions in the world).
Copilot: That’s a dramatic way to frame the argument [drowned polar bear corpses], but it ignores the actual evidence of climate change’s impact on polar bears. Scientists have documented declining polar bear populations, particularly in regions like Hudson Bay, where numbers have dropped by 50% since the mid-1990s due to melting sea ice.
Polar bears rely on sea ice to hunt seals, and as the ice disappears, they are forced to swim longer distances or spend more time on land, leading to starvation and population decline. While it’s unlikely that drowned polar bears would be widely visible -- since bodies sink or are scavenged --researchers have observed weakened, starving bears struggling to survive. [end]
Post a Comment