Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Friday, May 16, 2025
When Artists Become Boring...
...Bore me later, Bruce!
One of the Problems with Celebrity Ego's is that they often FAIL to do their jobs, to 'Entertain'. I think that Bruce may be simply searching for a little love...
Can this country ever become United again? Let’s face it,the Democrats outwardly divide people by race and gender. And Obama tells black men they must vote for the black woman Trump can unite the country as long as he refuses to waste his time on those dividers from CNN, The VIEW, and MSNBC and elsewhere. These fools are working on behalf of making Americas hate each other.
Doubtful, per Albert Camus/ Franz Kafka... the "systemetizzers" have us over a barrel:
And one giant area that he thought was massively overinflated during his time is how people in the modern world typically view politics, which was for him at least one small part of the rise of people like Hitler and Stalin. He says in the speech, if he had to give a piece of advice to his generation, he says, he understands why politics is so inflated in people's lives. And maybe you could make a case that it's still necessary, but as soon as we can, he says, we need to bring the role of politics back down to its' proper size, he says. And this is one of my favorite lines by him, "Politics should do our housekeeping. It shouldn't settle our domestic disputes."
And what he means is, politics throughout history generally, has been about certain things: about collecting taxes, building roads, maintaining the order of things. It's about doing the sort of background stuff that then allows for the actual people to go about living their lives, creating what the society is that they live in. But in today's world it's different. Today politics gives you an entire worldview. Politics gives you a theory of love, he says. It gives you a way you think people should be living their lives, what freedoms you think people should be having. It gives you a picture of what you think justice should even be.
But this is not traditionally something that went on in the realm of politics. In the past this has been done wherever people are having their conversations, whether it's philosophical, religious, when people come together to discuss the world they live in. But when these things get wrapped up under the banner of politics in particular, well, the whole thing invites people to make their positions on these things antagonistic to each other. Every conversation foreshadows to some distant November off into the future, where these ideas are going to go to battle with each other in a giant Super Bowl of politics. Somewhere where your worldview is not just a disagreement we have with each other, where if you disagreed with me I might be grateful that you helped me develop my position like it might work in philosophy. No, in politics now you are my political enemy. Now you're destroying the world I want my kids to live in, in some binary competition where everyone in it has to pick one side or the other.
The state of our conversations always existing under the banner of politics allows people to get away with bad philosophy. And you can see this in who's the most successful in political conversations. It's not people actually trying to understand the world better. It's the people best at rhetoric. It's the people who are the best at steel-manning their own side, ignoring the limitations of it, and then framing the other side in the worst way they possibly can.
As for Dervy, he simply embraces his white guilt-pride and normalizes it...
To Camus, Kafka captures the essence of what it is to be an honest person in the modern world, he just puts it in dramatized form that seems ridiculous to most people. But here's the thing, it's not really any more ridiculous than our world. It's just a different world than the world most of us have found a way to normalize, or to escape from all the time.
Camus would want us to notice how the protagonists in many of Kafka's novels just agreeably go along with the absurdity of the world they're in, much like we do. I mean, sure the character K from the book initially asks why he's being arrested. But look, it doesn't take much for him to forfeit any kind of freedom he might otherwise have to the set of procedures he finds himself living in the middle of. He lives in a state of guilt, accused of something, not really sure of what. And his solution is to just outsource his decision-making about what to do next, to outsource his morality to the officials that always tell him the next place to be, the next thing to do, and the next way he needs to be thinking.
Camus thinks this is the fate of many people that are living in the modern world. Because, substitute the court system in this story for something like a modern-day political party or a cause, and you essentially have the life of how many people frame their whole place in the Universe. They don't know what to think until the officials tell them what to think. Moments that seem like something out of a nightmare happen right in front of them. They're confused for a second, but only until they can get the officials to tell them "Don't worry. All this is very normal. This is all a part of the plan."
To Camus, to outsource your morality and your knowledge to some set of faceless bureaucrats with a clear agenda... this is a recipe for living a life where there is no freedom for you really anymore. There's just compliance to a set of procedures every day, like Joseph K in the book. Decisions become just about following the next procedure. Procedures you either follow, and then get a nice pat on the head for following them that day, or you can deviate from them, and you'll very quickly realize how much control these people have over your thinking.
Camus calls this move at one point, something that happens to people when they "embrace the god that consumes them". And the thinking is, whether it's a political party, or a philosophy, or even an actual god. I guess when it comes to these things that allow us to continue to live without facing our existence head-on, better to embrace a god that consumes you for some people, than to live in a state of true lucid revolt.
Minus: ...and yet here you sit, ever at the ready to criticize the white race, yet never the black. Funny how that works.
I don't think it's funny at all that the United States has backslid into White Supremacy. And I have never criticized the White race. I think criticizing any race would be incredibly stupid. I criticize individuals or groups of individuals who do dumb things. Such as decide White Supremacy is a good idea. That group includes some minorities. You praised these minority individuals on this blog for agreeing with your stupidity. Like Candance Owens.
I share no such sensitivities and never want to. White Supremacy, but for with a miniscule ostracized few, is irrelevant to the black condition in America, and indeed the World, today. needless to say, there are for more BLACK and HISPANIC racists in America, than white, despite the demographic imbalances. You're guilt-pride is a "pathological" problem.
"I think that Bruce may be simply searching for a little love".
I think you think wrong. He would have more love by staying silent on politics. As opposed to alienating a portion of his audience. There are artists I like that have said nothing about donald trump, but that hasn't caused me to dislike them. Even though, I admit, I like those that bravely speak up against d0n0ld more. But Bruce Springsteen isn't a celebrity whose art I previously enjoyed. Given that I'm not a fan of his music. I don't dislike his music, I'm just not a fan.
But I would say that (now) I am a fan of him as a bold d0n0ld dissenter. Though he will never know of my like for his words of dissent. I don't think my like of his words gets him any love. None that he is (or ever will be) aware of. He is likely more aware of the hate his words have attracted.
I did not watch any celebrity videos about the pandemic.
Minus: As for me, I'd say that the white race is extremely gullible. As for the black, I'd call it very "opportunistic".
That fits with d0n0ld's false White Grievance narrative. Whites are the victims of their own gullibility and are being taken advantage of by Blacks.
Copilot: If his critique of white people places them in the passive victim role, while his critique of black people paints them as predatory opportunists, then it’s not actually balanced -- it’s just reinforcing the same racial grievance narratives that have long been used to justify resentment and division.
The Democrat leadership is signaling a dangerous sympathy not just for the Palestinian cause, but for the extremist ideologies that fuel jihadist violence. This is not a fringe issue anymore — it’s fast becoming a dangerous, central feature of the leftist. Progressive, Communist Democrats. And the Israel-Gaza conflict has exposed deep ideological fractures in the democratic parti\y’s politics, with a growing segment of the Democratic Party moving in a very different and a very disturbing direction. The statements that they have been issuing have been downplaying the Hamas many atrocities to outright hostility toward Israel’s very existence, Democrat leadership is signaling a dangerous sympathy not just for the Palestinian cause, but for the extremist ideologies that fuel the entire amount of the Jihadist violence... At the heart of the shift is the American Communist Democratic Party’s Radical Progressive Communist Wing, which views the world through a lens of Oppressors and the Oppressed. In this framework,. Even the Jewish menbers of the party are partaking in this monstrosity. And at the very heart of it we can find Chuck Schumer and sever others of the Party. Members of Congress, like Representatives Rashida Tlaib , Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,, Summer Lee, Ayanna Pressley, , Andre Carson , and especially Representative Jasmine Crockett and others have repeatedly made statements that equate Israeli counterstrikes with “War Crimes”, while offering little to no condemnation of the brutal tactics used by Hamas. Tlaib, for instance, refused to denounce the October 7 Massacre of Israeli Civilians outright, turning a Blind Eye, and choosing instead to focus on alleged Israeli “Genocide” — parroting the very rhetoric used by Radical Islamic Groups. It’s extremely Dangerous. And it t Legitimizes Terror and Emboldens America’s Enemies, both abroad and at here home, as we have seen it all too much in our prestigious Universities almost on a regular basis. .Democrats are trying to hide this because they are risking, and alienating their base if they appear too supportive of Israeli or too harsh in their “Condemnation of Hamas” .
Exactly. Blacks have 'agency'... an agency which you deny them through neoracist DEI and Affirmative action policies. You feel the need to "supplement" their agency. They don't need white saviours.
Virtue signaling ridiculous levels of empathy draws no consequences for the signalers until we all acknowledge that its' a problem and admonish, as you are doing, the beneficiaries. They want us to believe that they are "good people". The causes that they signal support for (ie- Hamas) prove that they are not. The Palestinian people are VICTIMS of Hamas' (and formerly PLO) leadership and until they throw off that leadership with or without IDF help, deserve no 'unreasoned' empathy.
"Worked" to what effect? None. And, he can't simply be speaking his mind? To you, nobody's mind works that way; there always is an ulterior motive. To the narcissist, everyone believes in "me first" and "what's in it for me". And ascribes their motivation to everyone else.
Minus: Blacks have 'agency'... an agency which you deny them through neoracist DEI and Affirmative action policies. You feel the need to "supplement" their agency. They don't need white saviors.
Me: Can people have agency without equality?
Copilot: If agency is simply the ability to make choices, then yes -- people can have agency without full equality. But what choices are truly available when systemic barriers limit access to power, resources, and upward mobility? That’s where the debate around DEI and affirmative action enters: some see it as supporting agency by correcting imbalances, while others argue it undermines individual autonomy by enforcing external assistance.
Your question highlights that agency alone doesn’t guarantee fair opportunities -- just because someone can act, doesn’t mean they have the same ability to succeed as someone in a more privileged position. [end]
Black people DON'T need White Saviors. But White people who WANT to help lift up their fellow humans (and also lift themselves up at the same time) they aren't a "savior", they are an ALLY. Contrast that with you, an openly hostile enemy who seeks to keep minorities down and replace competent, intelligent and skilled minorities and women down (and in their place) so that less qualified, less intelligent and less skilled Whites can take their place. An philosophy (White Supremacy) that works to the detriment of everyone.
Minus: The causes that they signal support for (ie- Hamas) prove that they are not.
True. If someone signals support for Hamas, that proves they are not a good person. However, the people of Gaza aren't in lockstep with Hamas. That's your false narrative that allows you to support their genocide. And proves you aren't a good person.
Mystere: Dervish sniffed his boyfriend Jake Crapper's bare behind to inhale his toots. He confessed at Donkey's Revenge.
BS. I made no such confession. I speculated that YOU got high sniffing his toots. I think you're high on Jake Crapper toots right now, which would explain why you're spouting your delusions again.
Minus: Yes, people always speak their minds during performances to audiences without motive.. @@
His motive would be his conscience @@
"If I were to remain silent, I'd be guilty of complicity" – Albert Einstein.
"Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence" – Leonardo da Vinci.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" – Often attributed to Edmund Burke.
Copilot: The idea that Springsteen is virtue signaling -- expressing political views for social approval rather than genuine conviction -- is a common criticism leveled at celebrities who engage in political discourse. However, Springsteen has been outspoken about his political beliefs for decades, long before Trump’s presidency. His music often reflects themes of working-class struggles, social justice, and American identity, making his political stance consistent with his artistic persona.
It’s a common critique of celebrity activism, questioning whether statements are driven by genuine beliefs or strategic branding. But given Springsteen’s long history of politically charged music and activism, many would argue that his stance is consistent rather than opportunistic. [end]
And who would those people be? I think many of them are imaginary. I know Turd-2 wants to go after college students in the US who oppose the slaughter going on in Gaza. You mean these people. They are NOT enablers of Hamas. They are opposed to genocide.
Do you think idiots expressing support for Luigi should be arrested and given prison sentences? As an authoritarian you support abolishing the first amendment?
Which only proves that your reasoning is no better than ChatGTPs and that I should stop trying to reason with chatbot-level human intelligences that created the hyper-reality narratives that they were trained on.
I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinions until the moment they interfere with the rights of their opponents. Free speech can never be to exhort others to "Kill the Jews", yet ask these students to exercise their speech and they will shout, "Kill the Jews".
48 comments:
👍Bruce 👏👏👏👏👏
^^searching for love^^ ^^sends nude selfies to Bruce^^
Can this country ever become United again?
Let’s face it,the Democrats outwardly divide people by race and gender. And Obama tells black men they must vote for the black woman
Trump can unite the country as long as he refuses to waste his time on those dividers from CNN, The VIEW, and MSNBC and elsewhere. These fools are working on behalf of making Americas hate each other.
Doubtful, per Albert Camus/ Franz Kafka... the "systemetizzers" have us over a barrel:
And one giant area that he thought was massively overinflated during his time is how people in the modern world typically view politics, which was for him at least one small part of the rise of people like Hitler and Stalin. He says in the speech, if he had to give a piece of advice to his generation, he says, he understands why politics is so inflated in people's lives. And maybe you could make a case that it's still necessary, but as soon as we can, he says, we need to bring the role of politics back down to its' proper size, he says. And this is one of my favorite lines by him, "Politics should do our housekeeping. It shouldn't settle our domestic disputes."
And what he means is, politics throughout history generally, has been about certain things: about collecting taxes, building roads, maintaining the order of things. It's about doing the sort of background stuff that then allows for the actual people to go about living their lives, creating what the society is that they live in. But in today's world it's different. Today politics gives you an entire worldview. Politics gives you a theory of love, he says. It gives you a way you think people should be living their lives, what freedoms you think people should be having. It gives you a picture of what you think justice should even be.
But this is not traditionally something that went on in the realm of politics. In the past this has been done wherever people are having their conversations, whether it's philosophical, religious, when people come together to discuss the world they live in.
But when these things get wrapped up under the banner of politics in particular, well, the whole thing invites people to make their positions on these things antagonistic to each other. Every conversation foreshadows to some distant November off into the future, where these ideas are going to go to battle with each other in a giant Super Bowl of politics. Somewhere where your worldview is not just a disagreement we have with each other, where if you disagreed with me I might be grateful that you helped me develop my position like it might work in philosophy. No, in politics now you are my political enemy. Now you're destroying the world I want my kids to live in, in some binary competition where everyone in it has to pick one side or the other.
The state of our conversations always existing under the banner of politics allows people to get away with bad philosophy. And you can see this in who's the most successful in political conversations. It's not people actually trying to understand the world better. It's the people best at rhetoric. It's the people who are the best at steel-manning their own side, ignoring the limitations of it, and then framing the other side in the worst way they possibly can.
As for Dervy, he simply embraces his white guilt-pride and normalizes it...
To Camus, Kafka captures the essence of what it is to be an honest person in the modern world, he just puts it in dramatized form that seems ridiculous to most people. But here's the thing, it's not really any more ridiculous than our world. It's just a different world than the world most of us have found a way to normalize, or to escape from all the time.
Camus would want us to notice how the protagonists in many of Kafka's novels just agreeably go along with the absurdity of the world they're in, much like we do. I mean, sure the character K from the book initially asks why he's being arrested. But look, it doesn't take much for him to forfeit any kind of freedom he might otherwise have to the set of procedures he finds himself living in the middle of. He lives in a state of guilt, accused of something, not really sure of what. And his solution is to just outsource his decision-making about what to do next, to outsource his morality to the officials that always tell him the next place to be, the next thing to do, and the next way he needs to be thinking.
Camus thinks this is the fate of many people that are living in the modern world. Because, substitute the court system in this story for something like a modern-day political party or a cause, and you essentially have the life of how many people frame their whole place in the Universe. They don't know what to think until the officials tell them what to think. Moments that seem like something out of a nightmare happen right in front of them. They're confused for a second, but only until they can get the officials to tell them "Don't worry. All this is very normal. This is all a part of the plan."
To Camus, to outsource your morality and your knowledge to some set of faceless bureaucrats with a clear agenda... this is a recipe for living a life where there is no freedom for you really anymore. There's just compliance to a set of procedures every day, like Joseph K in the book. Decisions become just about following the next procedure. Procedures you either follow, and then get a nice pat on the head for following them that day, or you can deviate from them, and you'll very quickly realize how much control these people have over your thinking.
Camus calls this move at one point, something that happens to people when they "embrace the god that consumes them". And the thinking is, whether it's a political party, or a philosophy, or even an actual god. I guess when it comes to these things that allow us to continue to live without facing our existence head-on, better to embrace a god that consumes you for some people, than to live in a state of true lucid revolt.
You regret sending the ones you mailed him?
I have never (and will never) embrace my nonexistent "white guilt-pride".
...and yet here you sit, ever at the ready to criticize the white race, yet never the black. Funny how that works.
As for me, I'd say that the white race is extremely gullible. As for the black, I'd call it very "opportunistic".
Indeed. I doubt that they captured my best attributes...
Minus: ...and yet here you sit, ever at the ready to criticize the white race, yet never the black. Funny how that works.
I don't think it's funny at all that the United States has backslid into White Supremacy. And I have never criticized the White race. I think criticizing any race would be incredibly stupid. I criticize individuals or groups of individuals who do dumb things. Such as decide White Supremacy is a good idea. That group includes some minorities. You praised these minority individuals on this blog for agreeing with your stupidity. Like Candance Owens.
I share no such sensitivities and never want to. White Supremacy, but for with a miniscule ostracized few, is irrelevant to the black condition in America, and indeed the World, today. needless to say, there are for more BLACK and HISPANIC racists in America, than white, despite the demographic imbalances. You're guilt-pride is a "pathological" problem.
BS.
"White Supremacy, but for with a miniscule ostracized few"...
Everyone who voted for donald trump voted for White Supremacy. I WISH they were a "miniscule ostracized few". Instead they are tens of millions.
"there are far more BLACK and HISPANIC racists in America, than white..."
...in your White Supremacist persecutory delusions.
"Us Conservative Whites are the REAL victims" = 🐂💩
"I think that Bruce may be simply searching for a little love".
I think you think wrong. He would have more love by staying silent on politics. As opposed to alienating a portion of his audience. There are artists I like that have said nothing about donald trump, but that hasn't caused me to dislike them. Even though, I admit, I like those that bravely speak up against d0n0ld more. But Bruce Springsteen isn't a celebrity whose art I previously enjoyed. Given that I'm not a fan of his music. I don't dislike his music, I'm just not a fan.
But I would say that (now) I am a fan of him as a bold d0n0ld dissenter. Though he will never know of my like for his words of dissent. I don't think my like of his words gets him any love. None that he is (or ever will be) aware of. He is likely more aware of the hate his words have attracted.
I did not watch any celebrity videos about the pandemic.
Minus: As for me, I'd say that the white race is extremely gullible. As for the black, I'd call it very "opportunistic".
That fits with d0n0ld's false White Grievance narrative. Whites are the victims of their own gullibility and are being taken advantage of by Blacks.
Copilot: If his critique of white people places them in the passive victim role, while his critique of black people paints them as predatory opportunists, then it’s not actually balanced -- it’s just reinforcing the same racial grievance narratives that have long been used to justify resentment and division.
The Democrat leadership is signaling a dangerous sympathy not just for the Palestinian cause, but for the extremist ideologies that fuel jihadist violence. This is not a fringe issue anymore — it’s fast becoming a dangerous, central feature of the leftist. Progressive, Communist Democrats. And the Israel-Gaza conflict has exposed deep ideological fractures in the democratic parti\y’s politics, with a growing segment of the Democratic Party moving in a very different and a very disturbing direction.
The statements that they have been issuing have been downplaying the Hamas many atrocities to outright hostility toward Israel’s very existence, Democrat leadership is signaling a dangerous sympathy not just for the Palestinian cause, but for the extremist ideologies that fuel the entire amount of the Jihadist violence... At the heart of the shift is the American Communist Democratic Party’s Radical Progressive Communist Wing, which views the world through a lens of Oppressors and the Oppressed. In this framework,. Even the Jewish menbers of the party are partaking in this monstrosity. And at the very heart of it we can find Chuck Schumer and sever others of the Party. Members of Congress, like Representatives Rashida Tlaib , Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,, Summer Lee, Ayanna Pressley, , Andre Carson , and especially
Representative Jasmine Crockett and others have repeatedly made statements that equate Israeli counterstrikes with “War Crimes”, while offering little to no condemnation of the brutal tactics used by Hamas. Tlaib, for instance, refused to denounce the October 7 Massacre of Israeli Civilians outright, turning a Blind Eye, and choosing instead to focus on alleged Israeli “Genocide” — parroting the very rhetoric used by Radical Islamic Groups. It’s extremely Dangerous. And it t Legitimizes Terror and Emboldens America’s Enemies, both abroad and at here home, as we have seen it all too much in our prestigious Universities almost on a regular basis. .Democrats are trying to hide this because they are risking, and alienating their base if they appear too supportive of Israeli or too harsh in their “Condemnation of Hamas” .
^^Lost in a worldview that ignores all evidence^^
Virtue signaling is a flashing warning sign of his searching for love in all the wrong places. And it worked. He's now gotten yours.
Exactly. Blacks have 'agency'... an agency which you deny them through neoracist DEI and Affirmative action policies. You feel the need to "supplement" their agency. They don't need white saviours.
Virtue signaling ridiculous levels of empathy draws no consequences for the signalers until we all acknowledge that its' a problem and admonish, as you are doing, the beneficiaries. They want us to believe that they are "good people". The causes that they signal support for (ie- Hamas) prove that they are not. The Palestinian people are VICTIMS of Hamas' (and formerly PLO) leadership and until they throw off that leadership with or without IDF help, deserve no 'unreasoned' empathy.
Wow! Dervish admits he sent his nudie brothel picks to Caitlyn Springsteen.
"Worked" to what effect? None. And, he can't simply be speaking his mind? To you, nobody's mind works that way; there always is an ulterior motive. To the narcissist, everyone believes in "me first" and "what's in it for me". And ascribes their motivation to everyone else.
Minus: Blacks have 'agency'... an agency which you deny them through neoracist DEI and Affirmative action policies. You feel the need to "supplement" their agency. They don't need white saviors.
Me: Can people have agency without equality?
Copilot: If agency is simply the ability to make choices, then yes -- people can have agency without full equality. But what choices are truly available when systemic barriers limit access to power, resources, and upward mobility? That’s where the debate around DEI and affirmative action enters: some see it as supporting agency by correcting imbalances, while others argue it undermines individual autonomy by enforcing external assistance.
Your question highlights that agency alone doesn’t guarantee fair opportunities -- just because someone can act, doesn’t mean they have the same ability to succeed as someone in a more privileged position. [end]
Black people DON'T need White Saviors. But White people who WANT to help lift up their fellow humans (and also lift themselves up at the same time) they aren't a "savior", they are an ALLY. Contrast that with you, an openly hostile enemy who seeks to keep minorities down and replace competent, intelligent and skilled minorities and women down (and in their place) so that less qualified, less intelligent and less skilled Whites can take their place. An philosophy (White Supremacy) that works to the detriment of everyone.
Minus: The causes that they signal support for (ie- Hamas) prove that they are not.
True. If someone signals support for Hamas, that proves they are not a good person. However, the people of Gaza aren't in lockstep with Hamas. That's your false narrative that allows you to support their genocide. And proves you aren't a good person.
Minus: [I am] Lost in a worldview that ignores all evidence.
^^your comment corrected to be accurate^^
Mystere: Wow! Dervish admits he sent his nudie brothel picks to Caitlyn Springsteen.
I never "admitted" I sent pictures that don't exist (and never will exist) to a person that only exists in your delusions.
Odd. Dervish hasn't thrown his temper tantrum, denying he sent his nudie selfies to Caitlyn Springsteen.
Mystere sends nude selfies of himself dancing the jiggly wiggly to his husband Rikishi. btw, I mean you, dipshit, not an imaginary "fart robot".
^^Depends on Artificial Intelligence to reason^^
Yes, people always speak their minds during performances to audiences without motive.. @@
^^Signals his support for Hamas^^
I support members of Hamas being killed. You disagree with my sentiment?
Dervish sniffed his boyfriend Jake Crapper's bare behind to inhale his toots. He confessed at Donkey's Revenge.
How about voters and enablers for Hamas?
Mystere: Dervish sniffed his boyfriend Jake Crapper's bare behind to inhale his toots. He confessed at Donkey's Revenge.
BS. I made no such confession. I speculated that YOU got high sniffing his toots. I think you're high on Jake Crapper toots right now, which would explain why you're spouting your delusions again.
Minus: Yes, people always speak their minds during performances to audiences without motive.. @@
His motive would be his conscience @@
"If I were to remain silent, I'd be guilty of complicity" – Albert Einstein.
"Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence" – Leonardo da Vinci.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" – Often attributed to Edmund Burke.
Copilot: The idea that Springsteen is virtue signaling -- expressing political views for social approval rather than genuine conviction -- is a common criticism leveled at celebrities who engage in political discourse. However, Springsteen has been outspoken about his political beliefs for decades, long before Trump’s presidency. His music often reflects themes of working-class struggles, social justice, and American identity, making his political stance consistent with his artistic persona.
It’s a common critique of celebrity activism, questioning whether statements are driven by genuine beliefs or strategic branding. But given Springsteen’s long history of politically charged music and activism, many would argue that his stance is consistent rather than opportunistic. [end]
I came up with that reply 100 percent on my own.
And who would those people be? I think many of them are imaginary. I know Turd-2 wants to go after college students in the US who oppose the slaughter going on in Gaza. You mean these people. They are NOT enablers of Hamas. They are opposed to genocide.
Do you think idiots expressing support for Luigi should be arrested and given prison sentences? As an authoritarian you support abolishing the first amendment?
Correction: They want to go after these college students and ARE. In violation of their free speech rights.
Which only proves that your reasoning is no better than ChatGTPs and that I should stop trying to reason with chatbot-level human intelligences that created the hyper-reality narratives that they were trained on.
His motive would be his conscience
...or applause and overt displays of fan support to feed his narcissism.
"Re-assure me... you're not just here to consume my musical performance, you're here to affirm "the real me" too!
I am lover for MORE than my Grammy's... they love me because I' also a "good" person." @@
...what an EGO.
White Saviour Democrats = total bs.
I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinions until the moment they interfere with the rights of their opponents. Free speech can never be to exhort others to "Kill the Jews", yet ask these students to exercise their speech and they will shout, "Kill the Jews".
...so no, it's not okay to Tweet "86 47" tweets.
...and if you do, it's hypocritical to complain if someone tweets back, "86 JC".
^^ thinks people who disagree with him shouldn't have free speech rights^^
Post a Comment