...for Ukraine or Republicans. Thanks for poking the bear, Victoria Nuland!
Meanwhile, another Russia Hawk Bites the Dust!
Statement from Congressman Ken Buck on his departure from Congress. pic.twitter.com/orjSzenZnv
— Rep. Ken Buck (@RepKenBuck) March 12, 2024
Maybe THIS is ultimately the Republican Never-Trump brain-trust plan (RICE) to get Ukraine it's Funding - Surrender House Control to Democrats!
71 comments:
Thanks for poking the bear, Victoria Nuland!
Ukraine: We like democracy.
Nuland: The US can help you set up democratic institutions.
Ukraine: Thank you.
Ukraine (later): Our Putin puppet isn't doing what we want. We will protest.
Result: The Putin puppet flees, giving up the presidency. He is replaced.
Minus: Victoria Nuland "poked the bear".
Putin's propaganda spin is that the United States paid for a Ukraine coup, but that is a myth. The Ukrainian people wanted to trade with Europe, and their Putin puppet said "My master Putin has commanded me to stop it".
Qtard probably thinks the 2013 Ukraine protest has parallels to January 6. Except Euromaidan was a protest that lead to a Putin puppet being replaced. While January 6 was an attempt to keep the Putin puppet in place.
The US can help you set up democratic institutions
So when's Ukraine's next "democratic" election? The day Putin achieves "total victory".
Martial Law. Isn't that "authoritarian dictatorship"? Thanks USA!
Hey player! You're thanking the wrong person, Assface! You should be thanking the old mumbling senile clown in the offal office since 2021, you know, the old klan cracker who was Obama's Veep, the farting pants pooper you slobber over daily. This wasn't possible without pResident Poopy Pants putting things into motion. So Player, remember to bend over and sniff Joey's behind and enjoy the smell erupting out of his body cavities, player Dervish.
Minus: So when's Ukraine's next "democratic" election? The day Putin achieves "total victory".
When Russia withdraws in defeat. People are supposed to turn out to vote when Russia is raining down missiles on them? What about the 6 million Ukrainians who fled? Many of them probably want to go home. Think they should be able to vote if elections are held. What about Ukrainians in Russian controlled territory? How are they supposed to vote?
Why would a Putin victory lead to elections in Ukraine? Wouldn't that mean that Ukraine is part of Russia again?
Mystere: Hey player! You're thanking the wrong person, Assface!
Your use of the word "player" proves "Porky" is another person and NOT you, Mystere? What next? Mystere will deflect from the fact that "Porky" is obviously his account by saying "Mystere isn't here"? Maybe asking if I'm drunk on "Tennessee Moonbat Hooch"?
I didn't say "thank you" to anyone, Mystere. You're defending Putin? Because you know that it is Putin who should be "thanked". Did Putin secure the biolabs, Mystere?
btw, predisent poopy pants dotard donald put this in motion, Mystere. Putin's puppet dotard donald has his republiturds running interference for him. Blocking aid to Ukraine in the House. And Putin is going to pull out all the stops to get his White Supremacist senile clown back in the presidency. Or "offal office" as you call it.
Barack Obama's vice president was Joe Biden, not an "old klan cracker". WHY would Barack Obama select an "old klan cracker" as his vice president? Why would Black voters turn out bigly for an "old klan cracker" -- want an "old klan cracker" to be president?
Black voters (a super majority of them) voted against the KKK-endorsed candidate, the racist Orange Turd, dotard donald.
Mystere would love to bend over and sniff donny's behind. He would definitely enjoy the smell erupting from dotard donald's endo.
Dervish Pimple Butt §atan~§ander$666 confesses to sniffing the old klan cracker Joey's bare turd stained buttocks and licking them with extreme glee.
Are you hearing voices, Mystere? My comment contains no such "confession".
\\Qtard probably thinks the 2013 Ukraine protest has parallels to January 6. Except Euromaidan was a protest that lead to a Putin puppet being replaced. While January 6 was an attempt to keep the Putin puppet in place.
Your alter-ego "Qtard"? ;-p
Seems like IT is.
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Minus: So when's Ukraine's next "democratic" election? The day Putin achieves "total victory".
\\ When Russia withdraws in defeat.
Yeah. And "the old klan cracker who was Obama's Veep" doing ALL for it to happen ASAP (as soon as possible)?
Naaaah.
Quite contrary.
IT doing only what HELPS liliPut.
\\Why would a Putin victory lead to elections in Ukraine?
Definite cretin DUNNO that liliPut carrying elections on "conquered" territories of Ukraine JUST NOW?
Yeah, most probably... IT is.
Dervish Pimple Butt Satan Sanders, you confessed by lying about what "Mystere" would allegedly like to do.
You're also angry because someone who calls himself Helmut Von Streudelstein called you out the very first time he came on one of Joe's posts. Helmut saw you for the demon possessed psychopath you really are, butt pimple Dervish.
Hey Q! Have you noticed Cretin Pimple Butt Satan Sanders ran off like the coward he really is?ππππππππππππ
Qtard: \\Qtard probably thinks the 2013 Ukraine protest has parallels to January 6. Except Euromaidan was a protest that lead to a Putin puppet being replaced. While January 6 was an attempt to keep the Putin puppet in place\\ Your alter-ego "Qtard"? ;-p Seems like IT is.
Qtard deploys it's "your alter ego Qtard" dodge. No refutation of what I said. Because what I said is accurate, yes? Accurate about the qtarded foreigner from far far away who is NOT my "alter ego".
Qtard: \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...\\ Minus: So when's Ukraine's next "democratic" election? The day Putin achieves "total victory".\\ When Russia withdraws in defeat\\ Yeah. And "the old klan cracker who was Obama's Veep" doing ALL for it to happen ASAP (as soon as possible)? Naaaah.
I agree. Though not completely. You have one fact wrong, which is that donald tRump was never Barack Obama's vice president.
Qtard: Quite contrary. IT doing only what HELPS liliPut.
You? Yeah, you do a lot of defending of Putin's puppet, donald tRump. I dunno how much "help" that is providing though. None to not much. Unless you refer to activities elsewhere. Maybe your work in some troll farm where you are doing much more to help?
Qtard: \\Why would a Putin victory lead to elections in Ukraine?\\ Definite cretin DUNNO that liliPut carrying elections on "conquered" territories of Ukraine JUST NOW?
As per a 3/14/2024 AP article, "Ukrainians living in regions illegally annexed by Russia are being coerced to vote in the presidential election of their wartime occupier, Vladimir Putin — an exercise denounced by Ukraine as an illegitimate effort by Moscow to tighten control over its neighbor".
Qtard thinks Putin keeps getting reelected "democratically"? He is The People's choice? Minus maybe thinks that. And The People of Ukraine, they'd select Putin to be their president too. That would be a way to end the war.
Qtard: Yeah, most probably... IT is.
"It is" what? Not knowing? Yeah, I believe that about IT. That cretin dunno a LOT of things. Like what facts and logic are.
Mystere: Dervish Pimple Butt Satan Sanders, you confessed by lying about what "Mystere" would allegedly like to do.
"Pimple Butt Satan" isn't a part of my Blogger display name, Mystere. As for what Mystere would allegedly like to do -- that is a conclusion the facts support. "This One" identified you as an eproctophile on Lisa's blog several years ago, Mystere. It is widely known that you're a fart sniffer. I heard that Mystere assaulted a police officer by ripping a huge noxious fart that almost caused the officer to pass out.
Qtard: You're also angry because someone who calls himself Helmut Von Streudelstein called you out the very first time he came on one of Joe's posts.
No, I'm not angry that you pretended to be someone calling themselves "Helmut". You frequently post under fake names. Why would such stupidity cause me to get angry. As opposed to laughing at your moronity?
Mystere: Helmut saw you for the demon possessed psychopath you really are, butt pimple Dervish.
YOU posted as "Helmut", Mystere.
Mystere: Hey Q! Have you noticed Cretin Pimple Butt Satan Sanders ran off like the coward he really is?
Mystere complains when I comment (compares my comments to farts) and complains when I don't comment (says I "ran off"). What do you want, Mystere? It hasn't been that long since my last comment. There are MANY posts here that you don't comment on. Why do you keep running away?
\\Qtard deploys it's "your alter ego Qtard" dodge.
Ehm-m-m??? Dodge???
That is YOUR CLAIM
\\Qtard: \\Qtard probably thinks the 2013 Ukraine protest has parallels to January 6.
And you attributed it PROPERLY to some "Qtard".
Which was shown many-many times are your alter-ego.
So.
I gone straight-forward -- admitting your words about ITself. ;-P
Ah... yeah...
Maybe that was self-referential -- you was talking about ITself all of the way?
Well... that I agree with such your self-referential observation. ;-P
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\No refutation of what I said.
And... WHY I should refute it???
Some your inner in-between SAMEBODY alter-egos quarrels??? ;-P
\\Accurate about the qtarded foreigner from far far away who is NOT my "alter ego".
"Accurate"????
With NO facts about "foreigner from far far away" provided???
And based only on some crazy SAMEBODY split-personality cretin cretinic and lying babbling????
NewSpeak meaning of word "accurate"? ;-P
\\Qtard thinks Putin keeps getting reelected "democratically"?
And Bi-den will call it "usurpator" and will STOP itself all and any connections with it. And will tell it to all other world countries???
Naaaaah.
Bi-den will CONTINUE to collude with its puppet-master... like nothing happened.
Because... that is IN ALL ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN -- to instill DEMN-OK-ratsy.
NORMALIZE unlawfully coerced re-elections.
\\"It is" what? Not knowing? Yeah, I believe that about IT. That cretin dunno a LOT of things. Like what facts and logic are.
Yeah... somebody else off SAMEBODY cretins merry bunch.
Qtard: Ehm-m-m??? Dodge???
Yes. Proven by you dodging.
Qtard: That is YOUR CLAIM.
Accurate observation. Proven accurate by you dodging. Then dodging again.
Qtard: \\Qtard probably thinks the 2013 Ukraine protest has parallels to January 6\\ And you attributed it PROPERLY to some "Qtard".
Yeah, you.
Qtard: Which was shown many-many times are your alter-ego.
"Many many" being your NewSpeak for NEVER.
Qtard: So. I gone straight-forward -- admitting your words about ITself. ;-P
No, I wasn't talking to your alter ego "ITself". I was talking to your alter ego "Qtard". Either could answer. But both dodged.
Qtard: Ah... yeah... Maybe that was self-referential...
No.
Qtard: you was talking about ITself all of the way?
Sure. I was talking to whatever alter ego of yours is in control.
Qtard: Well... that I agree with such your self-referential observation. ;-P
There wasn't one. And the observation OBVIOUSLY concerned you. I never said J6 was people exercising their "human right" to "decide again". Like (as per you, not me) Euromaiden being The People "deciding again".
Apparently you think that one of my "alter egos" is in complete agreement with you? But, if I had any alter egos, NONE would be a rightturd.
Qtard: \\No refutation of what I said\\ And... WHY I should refute it???
Or agree with it. Because it was a question directed at you.
Qtard: Some your inner in-between SAMEBODY alter-egos quarrels??? ;-P
That's the interpretation of you, a crazy person. Unlike you, I have no "samebody alter egos".
Qtard: \\Accurate about the qtarded foreigner from far far away who is NOT my "alter ego"\\ "Accurate"????\\ With NO facts about "foreigner from far far away" provided???
The facts are self evident -- your crazy babbling about "alter egos" and assertions that questions I direct at IT are actually directed at myself.
Qtard: And based only on some crazy SAMEBODY split-personality cretin cretinic and lying babbling????
^^MORE facts about the foreigner from far far away^^
You just provided some more. Or "moar".
Qtard: NewSpeak meaning of word "accurate"? ;-P
Dictionary definition.
Qtard: \\Qtard thinks Putin keeps getting reelected "democratically"?\\ And Bi-den will call it "usurpator" and will STOP itself all and any connections with it. And will tell it to all other world countries??? Naaaaah. Bi-den will CONTINUE to collude with its puppet-master... like nothing happened.
"Collude" in your NewSpeak being levying sanctions, helping with aid to Ukraine, seizing assets, etc. That "collusion". Yeah.
Qtard: Because... that is IN ALL ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN -- to instill DEMN-OK-ratsy.
Asked Googled if there is any such thing as "Demn-ok-ratsy".
Google says: "Your search - DEMN-OK-ratsy - did not match any documents".
Qtard: NORMALIZE unlawfully coerced re-elections.
More NewSpeak. "Normalize" being recognized by the democratic world as phony.
Wikipedia says "Elections in Russia have not been free and fair under Putin's rule. Political opponents are jailed and repressed, independent media is intimidated and suppressed, and electoral fraud is rampant. The Economist Democracy Index characterized Russia as authoritarian in 2022. Russia was ranked 22nd least electoral democratic country in Asia according to V-Dem Democracy indices in 2023 with a score of 0.209 out of 1.
Qtard: \\"It is" what? Not knowing? Yeah, I believe that about IT. That cretin dunno a LOT of things. Like what facts and logic are\\ Yeah... somebody else off SAMEBODY cretins merry bunch.
That does seem to be the case. I'll agree with this observation you made about yourself. Have you been diagnosed by a professional with split personality disorder?
\\Yes. Proven by you dodging.
"Proved"????
Maybe with factual quote? And with perfectly logical explanation? With overcoming counter-arguments?
Naaaah.
That's just a mere meaningless bubbling of obvious cretin and liar.
Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Accurate observation. Proven accurate by you dodging. Then dodging again.
Yeah.
Your cretinic delusion. ;-p
\\Yeah, you.
Yeah... your alter-ego.
\\"Many many" being your NewSpeak for NEVER.
Yeah... and that must be the case... because??? ;-P
Well.
No reason.
Just your babbling.
\\No, I wasn't talking to your alter ego "ITself". I was talking to your alter ego "Qtard". Either could answer. But both dodged.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Like (as per you, not me) Euromaiden being The People "deciding again".
Cretinic babbling.
WAT that "Euromaiden"????
And I NEVER commented on it.
\\NONE would be a rightturd.
Yawn.
But all are cretins.
\\Qtard: \\No refutation of what I said\\ And... WHY I should refute it???
\\Or agree with it. Because it was a question directed at you.
From NewSpeak liar that habitually using "you" instead of "I"... and babbling with/against own alter-egos??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Am I cretin to you, to answer to such cretinic babbling... like it anyhow intelligent? ;-P
\\That's the interpretation of you, a crazy person. Unlike you, I have no "samebody alter egos".
And that claim CONFIRMED... anyhow????
Naaaah... that is miserly baseless babbling of total cretin and liar. ;-P
\\The facts are self evident -- your crazy babbling about "alter egos" and assertions that questions I direct at IT are actually directed at myself.
Facts???
And you can refer to em... like provide PERFECTLY FACTUAL quotes? ;-P
Naaah... that's just miserly cretin lying babbling.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The more you lying, then less credible your babbling will be. ;-P
And now... it on a level "lying every time". :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: NewSpeak meaning of word "accurate"? ;-P
\\Dictionary definition.
Yeah???
Which one? ;-P
Can you provide QUOTE? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
\\"Collude" in your NewSpeak being levying sanctions, helping with aid to Ukraine, seizing assets, etc. That "collusion". Yeah.
Sanctions??? After which AMOUNT of oil sold only GROW???
Aid... that ceased to be sent. On vague reasons. Well... firm and definite delaying reasons.
Seizing assets??? And WHAT AMOUNT and where was seized??? On the THIRD YEAR of war.
\\Google says: "Your search - DEMN-OK-ratsy - did not match any documents".
Bragging about NOT having, NOT groking irony... SAME as soulless machine? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\More NewSpeak. "Normalize" being recognized by the democratic world as phony.
Do that Wikipedia... anywhere, saying about NOT RECOGNIZING leaders chosen in such "election"???
Naaaaah. Your DEMN world not only RECOGNIZE em... but LIKE to make deals with such tyrants EVEN MORE then with democraticly elected leaders.
\\That does seem to be the case. I'll agree with this observation you made about yourself. Have you been diagnosed by a professional with split personality disorder?
Habitually using "you" instead of "I".
Yawn.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: \\Yes. Proven by you dodging. "Proved"???? Maybe with factual quote?
Quote: "And I NEVER commented on it."
Dodging (not answering question) confirmed.
Qtard: And with perfectly logical explanation?
Yes. You confirmed it.
Qtard: With overcoming counter-arguments?
What "counter argument". You admitted it. Are you going to retract your admission? "Never said it"????
Qtard: Naaaah.
Lie.
Qtard: That's just a mere meaningless bubbling of obvious cretin and liar.
Yeah, your meaningless bubbling.
Qtard: Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments.
Your cretinic delusion.
Qtard: \\Accurate observation. Proven accurate by you dodging. Then dodging again\\ Yeah. Your cretinic delusion. ;-p
Wrote "your" in place of "my".
Qtard: \\Yeah, you\\ Yeah... your alter-ego.
Your alter ego.
Qtard: \\"Many many" being your NewSpeak for NEVER. Yeah... and that must be the case... because??? ;-P
Because your comment "Which was shown many-many times are your alter-ego" is false. I don't have alter egos. I'm talking to you, but you have no answer. So you dodge my question by claiming I am talking to an "alter ego".
Qtard: No reason. Just your babbling.
Self referring talks.
Qtard: \\No, I wasn't talking to your alter ego "ITself". I was talking to your alter ego "Qtard". Either could answer. But both dodged\\ **moronic laughter**
Qtard laughs at facts -- facts have no hold on IT. IT cannot be swayed with facts.
Qtard: \\Like (as per you, not me) Euromaiden being The People "deciding again"\\ Cretinic babbling. WAT that "Euromaiden"???? And I NEVER commented on it.
Wikipedia: The Revolution of Dignity (Ukrainian: Π Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π³ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ...), also known as the Maidan Revolution or the Ukrainian Revolution, took place in Ukraine in February 2014 at the end of the Euromaidan protests.
Qtard knows NOTHING about the protests in Ukraine that lead to President Viktor Yanukovych fleeing? I am not surprised. Even though IT previously claimed to know all about it.
Qtard: \\NONE would be a rightturd\\Yawn. But all are cretins.
Your alter egos are all cretins? I believe it. Thank you for confirming.
Qtard: \\No refutation of what I said\\ And... WHY I should refute it???\\Or agree with it. Because it was a question directed at you\\ From NewSpeak liar that habitually using "you" instead of "I"... and babbling with/against own alter-egos???
No. I was referring to a question I asked you. Not a question you asked yourself.
Qtard: Am I cretin to you...
Yes.
Qtard: ...to answer to such cretinic babbling... like it anyhow intelligent? ;-P
No. You keep asking yourself questions. Don't answer them.
Qtard: \\That's the interpretation of you, a crazy person. Unlike you, I have no "samebody alter egos"\\ And that claim CONFIRMED... anyhow????
You are the one who started babbling about "samebody alter egos", not me. That is your projection.
Qtard: Naaaah... that is miserly baseless babbling of total cretin and liar. ;-P
I agree with you about yourself.
Qtard: \\The facts are self evident -- your crazy babbling about "alter egos" and assertions that questions I direct at IT are actually directed at myself\\ Facts??? And you can refer to em... like provide PERFECTLY FACTUAL quotes? ;-P
Yes.
Quote: Yeah... somebody else off SAMEBODY cretins merry bunch.
Qtard: Naaah... that's just miserly cretin lying babbling.
Yes. I agree with you about yourself.
Qtard: The more you lying, then less credible your babbling will be. ;-P
Yes. I agree with you about yourself.
Qtard: And now... it on a level "lying every time".
Yes. I agree with you about yourself.
Qtard: NewSpeak meaning of word "accurate"? ;-P\\Dictionary definition. Yeah??? Which one? ;-P
Any one.
Qtard: Can you provide QUOTE?
Why? You dunno how to find a dictionary online? NMP.
Qtard: \\"Collude" in your NewSpeak being levying sanctions, helping with aid to Ukraine, seizing assets, etc...\\ Sanctions??? After which AMOUNT of oil sold only GROW???
Wikipedia: Russian production of oil products fell 11% in 2023 due to sanctions and low European demand. ... The G7 countries, plus the rest of the EU and Australia are amongst the main countries imposing the sanctions, a minority of the global nations.
Qtard thinks production falling means "amount of oil sold only grow"? In it's NewSpeak?
Qtard: Aid... that ceased to be sent.
Biden Administration Announces Urgent Security Assistance for Ukraine. March 12, 2024. This Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) package is valued at up to $300 million and includes capabilities to support Ukraine's immediate air defense, artillery, and anti-tank requirements.
Qtard: On vague reasons.
No. republiturds blocking.
Qtard: Well... firm and definite delaying reasons.
Qtard's delusions.
Qtard: Seizing assets??? And WHAT AMOUNT and where was seized??? On the THIRD YEAR of war.
Google it yourself. Assets have been seized. Looking into seizing more.
Qtard: \\Google says: "Your search - DEMN-OK-ratsy - did not match any documents"\\ Bragging about NOT having, NOT groking irony... SAME as soulless machine?
And how is your imaginary "demn-ok-ratsy" ironic? When it is Democrats who are supporting democracy and Republicans who are opposing it? That isn't irony. It is just a lie.
Qtard: \\More NewSpeak. "Normalize" being recognized by the democratic world as phony\\ Do that Wikipedia... anywhere, saying about NOT RECOGNIZING leaders chosen in such "election"???
How? Pretending they aren't the leaders anyway? Cutting off diplomatic relations? But you defended that previously. But you said that was what dotard donald was doing when his campaign was talking to Russians. Thought it was great.
Qtard: Naaaaah. Your DEMN world not only RECOGNIZE em... but LIKE to make deals with such tyrants EVEN MORE then with democraticly elected leaders.
"Demn world"? So, Democratic administrations recognize "such tyrants" while Republican ones don't? So why did donald tRump meet with Kim Jong Un? Democratic presidents didn't meet with him.
Qtard: \\... Have you been diagnosed by a professional with split personality disorder?Habitually using "you" instead of "I".
No. Not "NewSpeak yes".
Qtard: Yawn.
Yeah, your "you/I" cretinity again. It deserves a BIG yawn.
\\Dodging (not answering question) confirmed.
Properly attributed question? ;-P
Naaaaah.
Because cretin UNABLE to attribute questions properly. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: And with perfectly logical explanation?
\\Yes. You confirmed it.
Yeah???
And you can provide quotes and then explain -- HOW it was "You confirmed it."???
Naaaaah.
'Cause... cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\What "counter argument". You admitted it. Are you going to retract your admission? "Never said it"????
Where??? And WHAT???
I confirmed???
Because... you are cretin and liar, and crazy bonker -- *I* even as MUCH SMARTER opponent... cannot know to what you referring to... because most of the time that is either your own crazy babbling or just delusions (like with seeing "turds" in every capital "T" letter %-))))))).
And that is why communicating with you are so enticing and fun... ;-P
\\Qtard: Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments.
\\Your cretinic delusion.
Yeah.
CONFIRMED!
Cretin sees facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic".
See??? How it made? ;-P
But... you cannot... 'cause -- cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Because your comment "Which was shown many-many times are your alter-ego" is false. I don't have alter egos.
As I said... THAT IS ONE of symptoms. ;-P
People WITH split-personality disorder -- CLAIM they DO NOT have it. ;-P
\\I'm talking to you, but you have no answer. So you dodge my question by claiming I am talking to an "alter ego".
Because you are cretin and unable to formulate your questions properly. ;-P
\\Qtard laughs at facts -- facts have no hold on IT. IT cannot be swayed with facts.
Yeah.
That's what your SAMEBODY alter-ego "Qtard" and "IT" seems doing habitually. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Like when IT babbling "I NEVER said it"... to SAMEBODY words. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: \\Like (as per you, not me) Euromaiden being The People "deciding again"\\ Cretinic babbling. WAT that "Euromaiden"???? And I NEVER commented on it.
\\Wikipedia: The Revolution of Dignity (Ukrainian: Π Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π³ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ...), also known as the Maidan Revolution or the Ukrainian Revolution, took place in Ukraine in February 2014 at the end of the Euromaidan protests.
DO this HIGHLIGHTED words look THE SAME to you, cretin? ;-P
Maiden Definition & Meaning
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › ...
The meaning of MAIDEN is an unmarried girl or woman : maid. How to use maiden in a sentence.
AND.
Maidan Definition & Meaning
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › ...
The meaning of MAIDAN is an Asiatic or African parade ground or esplanade.
Well... this one -- total BS. That is TRADING PLACE of a city.
Well...
YET ONE proof WHAT cretin you are, Derpish SADners. ;-P
And NO AMOUNT of "NO, you are crertin" can FIX it, anyhow... because you DEMONSTRATING your cretinism... in everything you write, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I *ENCOURAGE* you to CONTINUE-CONTINUE demonstrating your cretinism... with every such "no, you are" babbling. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard knows NOTHING about the protests in Ukraine that lead to President Viktor Yanukovych fleeing? I am not surprised. Even though IT previously claimed to know all about it.
Yeah.
CORRECT reference to your alter-ego "Qtard". ;-P
\\Qtard: \\NONE would be a rightturd\\Yawn. But all are cretins.
\\Your alter egos are all cretins? I believe it. Thank you for confirming.
ALREADY forgot that it was YOUR OWN babbling... about YOUR OWN samebody cretins? ;-P
Or... that was some other of that SAMEBODY cretins babbling... so, current cretin at control of fingers which typing this self-confession... do not and cannot recognize its own, samebody, words??? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But... answer will be monkey screams of one of samebody cretins?
Yawn.
\\No. I was referring to a question I asked you. Not a question you asked yourself.
Incorrectly.
Yawn.
\\No. You keep asking yourself questions. Don't answer them.
Habitual use of "you" instead of "I"?
\\You are the one who started babbling about "samebody alter egos", not me. That is your projection.
Projection??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))
Of what???
That maybe ME are WHO write something... then claiming "I NEVER said it"??? ;-P
My "projection". Well... my bias. Is that other people are same smart as me -- know facts, or can investigate it oneself...
That's why it is so damn funny... to talk with such a cretin as you are. ;-P
\\Facts??? And you can refer to em... like provide PERFECTLY FACTUAL quotes? ;-P
\\Yes.
Yeah.
You can.
You confirmed being able to do that... couple of time.
Like just recently... with that "Mockongjay" case.
But.
You DO NOT do that... in all other cases. Why???
Like to be lying totalitarian cretin too much???? ;-P
\\Qtard: The more you lying, then less credible your babbling will be. ;-P
\\Yes. I agree with you about yourself.
Yeah.
It seems you REALLY... do like... to be lying totalitarian cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And I... benevolent enough -- to treat people they way THEY like it themself. ;-P
\\Qtard: NewSpeak meaning of word "accurate"? ;-P\\Dictionary definition. Yeah??? Which one? ;-P
\\Any one.
Yeah???
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
accurate
/ΛakjΚrΙt/
adjective
adjective: accurate
1.
(especially of information, measurements, or predictions) correct in all details; exact.
Surely... that is NOT how you cretin use word "accurate".
Where is all that "all details"??? Ahhh???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Can you provide QUOTE?
\\Why? You dunno how to find a dictionary online? NMP.
Well...
I did it. Just ABOVE^^^^
But... you will be screaming that that is WRONG quote. Incorrect. Made by me.
Even though I properly attributed it -- that it from Oxford Dictionary.
And that is one of most honored dictionaries in English-speaking world, isn't it?
\\Qtard thinks production falling means "amount of oil sold only grow"? In it's NewSpeak?
Is Wikipedia CORRECT source for such information???
Or... for such a cretin as you -- anybody that babbling anything on the Web... is PROOF and FACT??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Biden Administration Announces Urgent Security Assistance for Ukraine. March 12, 2024. This Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) package is valued at up to $300 million and includes capabilities to support Ukraine's immediate air defense, artillery, and anti-tank requirements.
And... it was DECLARED that its "once in lifetime" aid.
Though there is 4 billions $ MOAAAR...
As well as numerous wirehouses and even openair stockpiles of all kinds of military goodies...
like endless fields of AH-1 helicopters... which could HELP to wretch havoc over that "impenetrable" Russian frontlines.
And... which would NEVER be used by USA. Because they do not meet modern standards of safety.
And will be scrapped.
Or will just rot completely in that desert.
But... ANYTHING goes. ANY excuse is DEMN-OK.
To NOT provide swift and decisive help to Ukraine... AND to help to survive puppet-master liliPut.
Like... here -- https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/sierra-army-depot
Or... here.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/99/72/09/99720999754b6781de4cb5e6fc1e6b85.jpg
SEE.
Endless Fields!
Even just showed on this one foto -- would be enough to deliver decisive blow.
\\Qtard: On vague reasons.
\\No. republiturds blocking.
Yap.
Vague reasons.
Yawn.
\\And how is your imaginary "demn-ok-ratsy" ironic?
And I must explain irony to non-understanding irony cretin???
And if I will not... it will start screeching that I "dodging"???? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\When it is Democrats who are supporting democracy and Republicans who are opposing it?
Yap.
While it mean "rule of Democrats". And when it Reps or any other party democraticly elected... that's "tyranny". Like you own screeching about "terrible-terrible years of dRump". :-))))))))))))))))0
Yawn.
\\That isn't irony. It is just a lie.
Means... anything you don't like, that do not fall firmly in Procruste's Bed of DEMN propaganda -- you call "lies".
Ou'Key!
I got it. ;-P
\\How? Pretending they aren't the leaders anyway? Cutting off diplomatic relations? But you defended that previously. But you said that was what dotard donald was doing when his campaign was talking to Russians. Thought it was great.
Yawn.
Gibberish BS.
\\"Demn world"? So, Democratic administrations recognize "such tyrants" while Republican ones don't? So why did donald tRump meet with Kim Jong Un? Democratic presidents didn't meet with him.
And where I said "meet with em"???
I said "making deals".
I just asked "Obama making deals with tyrants".
And it appeared before me --
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - Wikipedia
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA; Persian: Ψ¨Ψ±ΩΨ§Ω Ω Ψ¬Ψ§Ω ΨΉ Ψ§ΩΨ―Ψ§Ω Ω Ψ΄ΨͺΨ±Ϊ©, romanized: barnΔmeye jΔme'e eqdΔme moshtarak (Ψ¨Ψ±Ψ¬Ψ§Ω , BARJAM)), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal or Iran deal, is an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program reached in Vienna on July 14, 2015, between Iran and the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security ...
Viola!
Zero-bama MAKING DEALS with tyrants... for em to GAIN nuclear capabilities... to boot.
EVEN THOUGH... that tyrants SWORN to use it AGAINST ***USA*** itself.
Booom!!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But... crazy cretin will start screaming that it do not see it. Will be chanting some DEMN propaganda hand-waving workaround of it.
And...
you cretin KNEW it all way... that's why you tried to impose deceptive derailing from "making deals" into "meeting", yes? ;-P
But well... I will NOT wait for honest answer to that question. I am not cretin to believe that DEMN liar can suddenly start telling Truth. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: \\Dodging (not answering question) confirmed\\ Properly attributed question? Naaaaah.
Because cretin UNABLE to attribute questions properly.
wtf? What would a "proper attribution" look like? To a cretin? It is attributed to ME. Because I asked it. Directed at YOU. I dunno what you are babbling about. More dodging.
Qtard: And with perfectly logical explanation?\\Yes. You confirmed it\\ Yeah???
Yes.
Qtard: And you can provide quotes and then explain -- HOW it was "You confirmed it."???
I already DID. I gave you a quote. Which you ignored. More proof that your request for "quotes" is a cretinic game.
Qtard: Naaaaah. 'Cause... cretin. **moronic laughter**
Your admission? I agree. You are definitely a cretin.
Qtard: \\What "counter argument". You admitted it. Are you going to retract your admission? "Never said it"????\\ Where??? And WHAT??? I confirmed???
Yes.
I will quote AGAIN.
Quote: "And I NEVER commented on it".
Qtard: Because... you are cretin and liar, and crazy bonker -- *I* even as MUCH SMARTER opponent... cannot know to what you referring to... because... [I am such a huge cretin].
Wrote "you" instead of "I" and "*I*" instead of "you". Also forgot to write the real reason, which I added to your comment, correcting it. You're welcome.
Qtard: ...most of the time that is either your own crazy babbling or just delusions (like with seeing "turds" in every capital "T" letter %-))))))).
Yeah, your crazy babbling. Like once being "every". As usual. Like when you wrote that I claimed to know "everything" about Navalny. When I ONLY claimed I know more than you.
Qtard: And that is why communicating with you are so enticing and fun... ;-P
It gives you insight into your craziness? And is cheaper than going to a psychiatrist? Naaah.
Qtard: Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments\\ Your cretinic delusion\\ Yeah. CONFIRMED! Cretin sees facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic".
I agree with your observations about your alter ego "cretin". You do see facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic". Thanky for that insight into your crazy "scull".
Qtard: See??? How it made? ;-P But... you cannot... 'cause -- cretin. **moronic laughter**
Used "you" in place of "I".
Qtard: \\Because your comment "Which was shown many-many times are your alter-ego" is false. I don't have alter egos\\ As I said... THAT IS ONE of symptoms. ;-P
Of your insanity? To believe others have "alter egos" while you (due to your craziness) do not? Yeah, I think so.
Qtard: People WITH split-personality disorder -- CLAIM they DO NOT have it. ;-P
Yeah, you do.
Qtard: \\I'm talking to you, but you have no answer. So you dodge my question by claiming I am talking to an "alter ego"\\ Because you are cretin and unable to formulate your questions properly. ;-P
Bullshit.
Qtard: \\Qtard laughs at facts -- facts have no hold on IT. IT cannot be swayed with facts\\ Yeah. That's what your SAMEBODY alter-ego "Qtard" and "IT" seems doing habitually. **moronic laughter**
Used "your" in place of "my"
Qtard: Like when IT babbling "I NEVER said it"... to SAMEBODY words. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
Correction: babbling "it can quote" when IT'S OWN WORDS are summarized. That is your "Never said it". Despite the fact that we both know my summary is accurate.
Qtard: \\Like (as per you, not me) Euromaiden being The People "deciding again"\\ Cretinic babbling. WAT that "Euromaiden"???? And I NEVER commented on it.
\\Wikipedia: The Revolution of Dignity (Ukrainian: Π Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π³ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ...), also known as the Maidan Revolution or the Ukrainian Revolution, took place in Ukraine in February 2014 at the end of the Euromaidan protests.
DO this HIGHLIGHTED words look THE SAME to you, cretin? ;-P
YES. With the exception of ONE letter. But that was enough to confuse you. Even though (when I originally asked the question) I spelled it "Euromaidan". ONLY spelled it "Euromaiden" later. So what I was talking about was quite easy to figure out. Yet you (due to cretinism) could not.
Qtard: Maiden Definition & Meaning. The meaning of MAIDEN is an unmarried girl or woman : maid.
Cretin thought I was talking about a European maiden?
Qtard: AND. Maidan Definition & Meaning Merriam-Webster https://www.merriam-webster.com › ... The meaning of MAIDAN is an Asiatic or African parade ground or esplanade. Well... this one -- total BS. That is TRADING PLACE of a city.
Yes. And that is the way it was spelled when I FIRST asked the question. But you (due to cretinity) got confused because of the second (slightly) incorrect spelling (by one letter).
Qtard: Well... YET ONE proof WHAT cretin you are, Derpish SADners. And NO AMOUNT of "NO, you are crertin" can FIX it, anyhow... because you DEMONSTRATING your cretinism... in everything you write, cretin.
OK. But you have demonstrated MUCH more being a cretin. Or should that be "crertin" as you JUST spelled it?
Given that you think the following words LOOK THE SAME...
Appearance = adgearance.
Barge = burge.
Blurt = bkurt.
Brown = brawn.
Criminal = crimibal.
Cretian = Critian.
Delusions = delugions.
Described = Dewscribed.
Dictators = deictators.
Dismissal = dismiasal.
Double checkable = double-cjeckable.
European = Europian.
Now my comments are going to spam.
I had more to say. But what is the point.
Used some "blakk magic" words? AGAIN! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\wtf? What would a "proper attribution" look like?
Ou'Key!
You asked politely (well, not exactly, but who cares), so I'll give a helping hand here. ;-P
To do a proper attribution, when asking MUCH SMARTER opponent, miserly cretin should say:
"I, miserly cretin, in my intellectual misery, asking YOU most venerable MUCH SMARTER opponent... to show your benevolence and to help me with understanding... of questions I miserly cretin barely aware." ;-P
Means.
Miserly cretins MUST show HUMiLiTY... before MUCH SMARTER brainiacs... Bu-ga-gah!!!!!!!
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\To a cretin? It is attributed to ME.
Yeah... to IT. ;-P
\\ I dunno what you are babbling about.
Yap.
'Cause... cretin.
It's NATURAL for cretin to be dunno about what MUCH SMARTER opponent saying. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you can provide quotes and then explain -- HOW it was "You confirmed it."???
\\I already DID. I gave you a quote. Which you ignored. More proof that your request for "quotes" is a cretinic game.
Because... as I, as much smarter opponent ALWAYS explaining.
That'll be ONLY FIRST STEP -- providing quote.
Very NEXT STEP -- argumenting RELEVANCE of that quote.
And then -- LOGICAL explanation -- why one gave that quote... and what it should mean.
You... cretin.
Learned only first step... and that, only barely -- you showing how you can copy-paste MY words.
But... that's NOT enough to be admitted correct quoting EVEN. As you cretin tend to mangle that quotes, or LIE about em.
\\Qtard: Naaaaah. 'Cause... cretin. **moronic laughter**
\\Your admission? I agree. You are definitely a cretin.
Yeah.
Like in THIS case. Just one of numerous.
How you CUTTED that excerpt OUT OF CONTEXT.
To PRETEND that that was "your admission". :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
What a cretin, you are. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Cretin that apparently think that others are the same cretin as you are... and will NOT SEE all falsehood of such "quoting".
So.
WHY I need to take your quotes as something truthful????
While you LIE so much and so relentlessly??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
You -- lying, you -- loser. Eat the dust, sucker. ;-P
Such a miserly cretin as you are -- WILL NEVER be able to score some victory from much smarter opponent. ;-p
Especially with such miserly cretinic lies. ;-p
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Wrote "you" instead of "I" and "*I*" instead of "you".
Yeah.
That's what you do.
Yawn.
\\I will quote AGAIN.
\\Quote: "And I NEVER commented on it".
Yep.
Incorrectly attributed.
Yawn.
Easy to see why.
Just couple clarifying questions: And to what it refer to? Why it important? That my(??? you even was NOT ABLE to show that that was MY words... in that quote).
Unanswered.
Yawn.
And well. Still. That my words are OBVIOUSLY TRUE. I really NEVER commented some Euro-maiden. ;-P
Well... until you, in your cretinism -- mentioned it.
AFTER that, I did... really commented it -- pointed at YOUR cretinism. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))0
So... WHY you insist on quoting such my words -- SO self-revealing. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Yeah, your crazy babbling.
Yeah???
And you can QUOTE it? ;-P
And argument out it? ;-P
And EXPLAIN... how it "crazy babbling"? ;-P
Naaaaaah.
You can't.
Because you are cretin.
So... you can only try to "embelish" your crazy babbling with some more crazy babbling... like calling my wise words "crazy babbling". ;-P
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Like when you wrote that I claimed to know "everything" about Navalny. When I ONLY claimed I know more than you.
Yap.
Obvious lie. ;-P
You are cretin. And you know ZILCH about Navalny.
But still bragging, lyingly, that you know a lot.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Which... in comparation with MY knowledge, not complete, but quote big -- should be EVERYTHING... to be "I know more than you".
So.
WHY you mentioning that EXEMPLAR example of YOUR OWN lies, ahh??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
To CONFIRM being lying cretin?
Well... seems like it. IT is. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\It gives you insight into your craziness? And is cheaper than going to a psychiatrist? Naaah.
Giving insightes from own experience? AGAIN! :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments\\ Your cretinic delusion\\ Yeah. CONFIRMED! Cretin sees facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic".
\\I agree with your observations about your alter ego "cretin". You do see facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic". Thanky for that insight into your crazy "scull".
And WHOSE words in that quote *I* HIGHLIGHTED???
WHO called facts and logic "delusion"??? ;-p
Isn't that was words of one precise deluded crazy cretin -- you. :-))))))))))))))))))
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
As well...
as earlier YOU admitted that YOU "Wrote "you" instead of "I" and "*I*" instead of "you"."
\\Yeah, you do.
Ehm???? :-))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\I'm talking to you, but you have no answer. So you dodge my question by claiming I am talking to an "alter ego"\\ Because you are cretin and unable to formulate your questions properly. ;-P
\\Bullshit.
Yeah.
Your claims are BS. ;-P
You are right. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Despite the fact that we both know my summary is accurate.
You and your other alter-ego? ;-P
\\YES. With the exception of ONE letter. But that was enough to confuse you.
Yeah.
Because that is that Achilles's Ankle of English language.
You ITself tried to bite me for mistypings of such kind.
Was it mistyping??? Then why you NOT admitted it right away????
Or... that is just a CoNFIRMATION of your cretinism -- cannot write proper English? ;-P
Even though you are native speaker and have TONS of practice in it?
Means... still, just a cretin, you are. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Even though (when I originally asked the question) I spelled it "Euromaidan". ONLY spelled it "Euromaiden" later.
Yeah.
YOU mentioned.
Then... "forgetting" that.
Then... starting screaching "YOU commented EuroMaiden"!!!
And tried to accuse me lying when I said that I DIDN'T.
Yawn.
Such is OBVIOUS cretinism you showing... all of the time.
And there is SO MANY cretinism... that I even losing track of it. :-))))))))))))))))))))
\\So what I was talking about was quite easy to figure out.
Easy???
Well, for you, inside your scull. In-between your other alter-egos.
Well, probably. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Cretin thought I was talking about a European maiden?
Samebody else of your alter-egos???
\\Appearance = adgearance.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
adherence
/ΙdΛhΙͺΙrΙns/
noun
noun: adherence; plural noun: adherences
1.
attachment or commitment to a person, cause, or belief.
Easy to see -- a mistyping -- key "h" close to key "g".
Yawn.
But...
I LIKE it.
How you worked your butt out -- to confirm own cretinism. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: Used some "blakk magic" words? AGAIN!
What words? "Facts" and "logic"? Those are magic to IT? Well, that you don't understand either is obvious.
Qtard: \\wtf? What would a "proper attribution" look like?\\Ou'Key! ... To do a proper attribution, when asking MUCH SMARTER opponent, miserly cretin should say...
OK. Go ahead and say that then.
Qtard: Means. Miserly cretins MUST show HUMiLiTY... before MUCH SMARTER brainiacs... Bu-ga-gah!
Well, I wouldn't call myself a "brainiac". Maybe compared to you. But. I will wait to see if you show humility. To me, the "brainiac" from you, the cretin.
Qtard: \\To a cretin? It is attributed to ME\\ Yeah... to IT.
No, not you/it. Me.
Qtard: \\ I dunno what you are babbling about\\ yap. 'Cause... cretin. It's NATURAL for cretin to be dunno about what MUCH SMARTER opponent saying.
It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about.
Qtard: And you can provide quotes and then explain -- HOW it was "You confirmed it."???\\ I already DID. I gave you a quote. Which you ignored. More proof that your request for "quotes" is a cretinic game\\ Because... as I, as much smarter opponent ALWAYS explaining. That'll be ONLY FIRST STEP -- providing quote. Very NEXT STEP -- argumenting RELEVANCE of that quote. And then -- LOGICAL explanation -- why one gave that quote... and what it should mean.
Yeah. "what it should mean". aka what the cretin thinks I "really mean". That is the step where IT lies. Well, it lies in the first step to -- when I partially quotes. Like "I *do* deny". Then (in the last step) inserted lie (what I "really" meant) "em their rights".
Qtard: You... cretin. Learned only first step... and that, only barely -- you showing how you can copy-paste MY words.
Because I'm not liar. I don't use your steps for lying. I tell the truth.
Qtard: But... that's NOT enough to be admitted correct quoting EVEN. As you cretin tend to mangle that quotes, or LIE about em.
Self referring talks. Though you place the blame for your mangling and lying on your alter ego "you cretin".
Qtard: Naaaaah. 'Cause... cretin. **moronic laughter**\\ Your admission? I agree. You are definitely a cretin\\ Yeah. Like in THIS case. Just one of numerous. How you CUTTED that excerpt OUT OF CONTEXT. To PRETEND that that was "your admission".
I'm sorry. I should have known you would not admit the truth.
Qtard: What a cretin, you are. ... Cretin that apparently think that others are the same cretin as you are... and will NOT SEE all falsehood of such "quoting". So.
As if you didn't do that to me FIRST. Just did it recently. When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me "admitting" being a liar.
Qtard: WHY I need to take your quotes as something truthful????
Need? You can't. Because you need to lie about them. As a pathological liar.
Qtard: While you LIE so much and so relentlessly???
Self referring talks.
Qtard: You -- lying, you -- loser. Eat the dust, sucker. ... Such a miserly cretin as you are -- WILL NEVER be able to score some victory from much smarter opponent.
In your delusions.
Qtard: Especially with such miserly cretinic lies. ;-p
Self referring talks.
Qtard: \\Wrote "you" instead of "I" and "*I*" instead of "you"\\ Yeah. That's what you do. Yawn.
Yes. You just did it again.
Qtard: \\I will quote AGAIN. \\Quote: "And I NEVER commented on it"\\ Yep. Incorrectly attributed. Yawn.
Attributed to YOU. What? "Never said it"?
Qtard: Easy to see why. Just couple clarifying questions: And to what it refer to? Why it important? That my(??? you even was NOT ABLE to show that that was MY words... in that quote).
Bullshit. Those were DEFINITELY your words. I copied and pasted them from YOUR comment.
Qtard: That my words are OBVIOUSLY TRUE. I really NEVER commented some Euro-maiden. ;-P Well... until you, in your cretinism -- mentioned it.
Never commented on Eromaidan either. But. IT thinks saying "I never commented on it" re "Euro-maiden"... that makes IT clever. To pretend it did not know what I was referring to. But that is just a cretinic game. IT loves playing cretinic games.
Qtard: AFTER that, I did... really commented it ...
Quote where you "really commented it", liar.
Qtard: So... WHY you insist on quoting such my words -- SO self-revealing.
Because you asked. Well, I knew it was a waste of time. To give you a quote when you ask for it. Because your "and you can quote" is a cretinic game.
btw, your wrote...
"you even was NOT ABLE to show that that was MY words".
Then...
"such my words"
So, words I wasn't able to prove are yours... they are "my words".
ADMISSION of lying!
Qtard: \\Yeah, your crazy babbling\\ Yeah??? And you can QUOTE it? ;-P And argument out it? ;-P And EXPLAIN... how it "crazy babbling"? ;-P Naaaaaah.
Right. NO. I just said it's a waste of time to play your cretinic games.
Qtard: You can't. Because you are cretin.
Lie. I did. When I quoted your "I never commented on it". You babbled in response that it was not "properly attributed".
Qtard: So... you can only try to "embelish" your crazy babbling with some more crazy babbling... like calling my wise words "crazy babbling". ;-P
You never typed any wise words. And WHY do you put "embelish" in quotes? I never misspelled "embellish" incorrectly. I searched the page. Only YOU misspelled "embellish".
Qtard: \\Like when you wrote that I claimed to know "everything" about Navalny. When I ONLY claimed I know more than you\\ Yap. Obvious lie.
Yeah. Your lie was obvious. That there is ANY comparing of him with tRump.
Qtard: You are cretin. And you know ZILCH about Navalny.
Lie. I know his first name is "Alexi" and he died. But you say that is "zilch"? So neither of those are true? So, tell me cretin, what is his first name? Also tell me how he faked his death and is still alive.
Qtard: But still bragging, lyingly, that you know a lot.
"More than" is not "a lot". It could be. But in this case it isn't.
Qtard: Which... in comparation with MY knowledge, not complete, but quote big -- should be EVERYTHING... to be "I know more than you".
But you compared him to donald tRump. I know there is no comparison. I used ONLY that fact to conclude I know more than you about him. He ran against Putin. Was poisoned by Putin. Returned to Russia and was put in prison by Putin. And was killed by Putin. His first name is Alexi. And he can in NO WAY be compared to donald tRump.
Except they are both humans. That is what you said. Your "quote big" knowledge about Navalny, yes? That he was a human? Though you dunno he died? Because that fact is part of the "zilch" knowledge I have about him. So none of what I just said must be true.
Qtard: So. WHY you mentioning that EXEMPLAR example of YOUR OWN lies, ahh???
"Truth... its lies"? Yes, cretin? In your NewSpeak?
Qtard: To CONFIRM being lying cretin? Well... seems like it. IT is.
That is what it seems like to me. You confirming being cretin. And a liar. Like "Navalny" being his last name. That is "zilch" knowledge according to you. Same as his first name being "Alexi". How do you even know WHO I'm talking about? You can't. You MUST be talking about someone else. A person who you have "quote big" knowledge about. But not Alexi Navalny. You dunno even who that is.
ππππππππππππππππππππππππOh Dervy my Pookie Wookie! Your comments make me feel so HOT inside! I'm feeling soooo hot for you, my BIGLY POOKIE WOOKIE!ππππππππππππππππππππππππ
Qtard: \\It gives you insight into your craziness? And is cheaper than going to a psychiatrist? Naaah\\ Giving insightes from own experience? AGAIN!
Asking itself? What did your "samebody alter ego" say?
Qtard: Proved man-many times. With quotes. With logic. And with repelling any miserly babbling posed as arguments\\ Your cretinic delusion\\ Yeah. CONFIRMED! Cretin sees facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic"\\ I agree with your observations about your alter ego "cretin". You do see facts and logic as "delusions"... and own delusions being "facts and logic". Thanky for that insight into your crazy "scull"\\ And WHOSE words in that quote *I* HIGHLIGHTED???
I dunno. Because when I copied and pasted the highlighting was dropped. So I can't see it. Unless I scroll up. But why should I? You didn't scroll up to see I wrote "Euromaidan". You only saw "Euro-maiden" (the first time).
Even though (later) I wrote "Euromaiden" (no dash). You must have been "seeing" in your delusions. That is where you saw "Euro-maiden" (with a dash and an "E")?
Qtard: WHO called facts and logic "delusion"???
Not me. I never said anything like that. OH NO! "NEVER SAID"!!! You'll jump on that.
Qtard: \\Qtard thinks production falling means "amount of oil sold only grow"? In it's NewSpeak?\\Is Wikipedia CORRECT source for such information???
You tell me. YOU quoted Wikipedia later.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action
That link is from YOUR comment.
Qtard: Or... for such a cretin as you -- anybody that babbling anything on the Web... is PROOF and FACT???
Self referring talks. Obviously. Referring to itself quoting Wikipedia. Linking to a Wikipedia page.
Qtard: \\Biden Administration Announces ... $300 million and includes capabilities to support Ukraine's immediate air defense, artillery, and anti-tank requirements\\ And... it was DECLARED that its "once in lifetime" aid.
No. It was (without checking) I think the 53rd time the Biden Administration used the presidential drawdown.
Qtard: Though there is 4 billions $ MOAAAR...
No. Cretin don't understand math.
Qtard: As well as numerous wirehouses and even openair stockpiles of all kinds of military goodies...
And republicans are voting on legislation to authorize sending those resources? From the "wirehouses" (as you call them)?
Qtard: like endless fields of AH-1 helicopters... which could HELP to wretch havoc over that "impenetrable" Russian frontlines.
That republicans are demanding a vote to send? Legislation that would provide money for the cost of sending those helicopters (which can't be sent for free)?
Qtard: And... which would NEVER be used by USA. Because they do not meet modern standards of safety. And will be scrapped. Or will just rot completely in that desert.
Which would cost a lot of money to send. Be a big operation. republicans are voting to authorize that?
Qtard: But... ANYTHING goes. ANY excuse is DEMN-OK.
republican excuses. Like, we have to do what our master Putin commands us to do.
Qtard: To NOT provide swift and decisive help to Ukraine... AND to help to survive puppet-master liliPut.
republiturd puppet master.
Qtard: Endless Fields! Even just showed on this one foto -- would be enough to deliver decisive blow.
I see a partial plane in that "foto". That one can be sent? The others probably need maintenance. Even MORE money to fix. MORE money to send. republicans are writing legislation to provide details and MONEY for that operation to be carried out?
Qtard: On vague reasons\\No. republiturds blocking\\ Yap. Vague reasons. Yawn.
Yeah, that is "vague". To a cretin.
Qtard: \\And how is your imaginary "demn-ok-ratsy" ironic?\\ And I must explain irony to non-understanding irony cretin???
Explain it to yourself? When you dunno what it is? HOW?
Qtard: And if I will not... it will start screeching that I "dodging"????
Naaahhh. I don't care.
Qtard: \\When it is Democrats who are supporting democracy and Republicans who are opposing it?\\ Yap. While it mean "rule of Democrats".
No.
Qtard: And when it Reps or any other party democraticly elected... that's "tyranny".
No.
Qtard: Like you own screeching about "terrible-terrible years of dRump".
I don't "screech". And I never said anything about "terrible-terrible years of dRump".
Qtard: \\That isn't irony. It is just a lie\\ Means... anything you don't like, that do not fall firmly in Procruste's Bed of DEMN propaganda -- you call "lies".
No. It is an objective truth. donald tRump LOST the election in 2020 and tried to undemocratically hold onto power.
Qtard: Ou'Key! I got it. ;-P
Thank you for agreeing. I dunno how you could disagree with reality. Though you frequently do.
Qtard: \\How? Pretending they aren't the leaders anyway? Cutting off diplomatic relations? But you defended that previously. But you said that was what dotard donald was doing when his campaign was talking to Russians. Thought it was great\\ Yawn. Gibberish BS.
YOUR gibberish. I'm just referring to what YOU said. But, AGAIN you probably don't remember. We were talking about the tRump communicating with Russians. You said it was what he was supposed to do. As a candidate, he was establishing diplomatic relations. JEEZ. Now you'll ask for a quote.
Quote: \\"Demn world"? So, Democratic administrations recognize "such tyrants" while Republican ones don't? So why did donald tRump meet with Kim Jong Un? Democratic presidents didn't meet with him.
Qtard: And where I said "meet with em"???
Meeting with isn't recognizing? What bullplop.
Qtard: I said "making deals".
So, donald tRump met with Kim Jong Un to shoot the breeze? Talk about their favorite Jennifer Lawrence movie? NOT to make any deals.
Qtard: I just asked "Obama making deals with tyrants". And it appeared before me -- https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action. Viola! Zero-bama MAKING DEALS with tyrants...
So what? No deal would be better? Sure. That is why tRump cancelled it?
Qtard: for em to GAIN nuclear capabilities... to boot.
No. The OPPOSITE. Prevented that. But. Cancelled by tRump. So they went back to working toward gaining nuclear weapons capabilities.
Qtard: EVEN THOUGH... that tyrants SWORN to use it AGAINST ***USA*** itself. Booom!!!!!
^^proof of your cretinism^^
A total mischaracterization of what the JCPOA did. An on-purpose mischaracterization? Or you just don't understand it? Due to your cretinism?
Qtard: But... crazy cretin will start screaming that it do not see it. Will be chanting some DEMN propaganda hand-waving workaround of it.
Yeah. A "hand-waving workaround of it" -- your not understanding what the JCPOA did.
Qtard: you cretin KNEW it all way... that's why you tried to impose deceptive derailing from "making deals" into "meeting", yes?
No. The ONLY purpose of meeting is to make deals.
Qtard: But well... I will NOT wait for honest answer to that question. I am not cretin to believe that DEMN liar can suddenly start telling Truth.
HOW is that NOT an honest answer? dotard donald just met with Kim Jong Un to say "hi"? Get a free meal? I thought the purpose was to negotiate a deal for them to abandon their nuclear weapons program. You dunno anything about that? Never heard of it?
Mystere: Oh Dervy my Pookie Wookie! Your comments make me feel so HOT inside! I'm feeling soooo hot for you, my BIGLY POOKIE WOOKIE!
Mystere is coming onto me again. I'm not interested, Mystere. That "hotness" could be an STD, Mystere. You should go to a doctor.
^GAY MEN'S BUTT LICKER^
πππππππππππππππππππππππOH FLARPY! MY BOINGLY BOING BOING is bigly bent every time you come by. Your lap dances straighten out my BIGLY BOINGLY BOING BOING every time you ride me and bend it back.
Heil Hamas! Frei PalΓ€stina! Heil Hamas! Frei PalΓ€stina!
Ah yes, go figure. My alternate account signed on. But again, what is the point.
"Cretin" Assface Dervish Butt Pimple bin Satan Sanders666 prayed to Satan to usurp blogger again.
Flarpy Blunderguff March 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM
"ππππππππππππππππππππππππOh Dervy my Pookie Wookie! Your comments make me feel so HOT inside! I'm feeling soooo hot for you, my BIGLY POOKIE WOOKIE!ππππππππππππππππππππππππ"
Dervish Sanders March 19, 2024
"πππππππππππππππππππππππOH FLARPY! MY BOINGLY BOING BOING is bigly bent every time you come by. Your lap dances straighten out my BIGLY BOINGLY BOING BOING every time you ride me and bend it back."
^^Dervish tries to walk back his retorts to his groupie? ^^
ππππππππππ
\\miserly cretin should say...
\\OK. Go ahead and say that then.
And. YOU said it. ;-P
Because YOU are cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\To me, the "brainiac" from you, the cretin.
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Entertaining me. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\To a cretin? It is attributed to ME\\ Yeah... to IT.
\\No, not you/it. Me.
Me-cretin? Some YET ONE alter-ego from under rotten scull of Derpish SADners crazy split-personality crackpot? ;-P
\\It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about.
You PERFECTLY CORRECT this time, cretin IT (or that is cretin ME? or some other cretin???).
But... that's just an accident and not proof of you cretin understanding what you just said.
Just some words you REPEATing after MUCH SMARTER opponent... without understanding. ;-P
\\Because... as I, as much smarter opponent ALWAYS explaining. That'll be ONLY FIRST STEP -- providing quote. Very NEXT STEP -- argumenting RELEVANCE of that quote. And then -- LOGICAL explanation -- why one gave that quote... and what it should mean.
\\Yeah. "what it should mean".
Yeah.
That's why people talking with each other. Discussing. Arguing about this or that things.
But you cretin DUNNO about it, isn't it? ;-P
\\That is the step where IT lies.
Yeah.
You are PERFECTLY CORRECT, cretin Me. ;-P
That is what your pal, alter-ego cretin IT doing nearly all of the time.
\\Then (in the last step) inserted lie (what I "really" meant) "em their rights".
Was "I deny them having such rights" was NOT your SAMEBODY words too? ;-P
Words you repeated MANY times. While keeping your adamant adherence to em?
Well... maybe this time it came into your sick scull -- how egregious such claim is -- denying people their Human Rights... it's borderline Nazism. Like what Nazis did to Jews -- DENIED em HAVING any rights.
\\Because I'm not liar.
Yeah.
Except that times... in your "lifetime"... when you, ITself... admitted lying.
Yawn.
YET ONE similarity with ITs puppet-master liliPut.
\\I don't use your steps for lying. I tell the truth.
Yeah.
Because you can't.
Because you are cretin.
And UNABLE to follow PROPER steps of discussing things
Yawn.
\\Self referring talks. Though you place the blame for your mangling and lying on your alter ego "you cretin".
Yap.
PROPER ATTRIBUTION... of ITself... to ITself. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Naaaaah. 'Cause... cretin. **moronic laughter**\\ Your admission? I agree. You are definitely a cretin\\ Yeah. Like in THIS case. Just one of numerous. How you CUTTED that excerpt OUT OF CONTEXT. To PRETEND that that was "your admission".
\\I'm sorry. I should have known you would not admit the truth.
Yeah.
I do not speak NewSpeakian. And therefore have no habit to name such obvious lies "Truth".
Yawn.
\\As if you didn't do that to me FIRST.
Well... you always free to provide quotes and explain why it should be the case.
But...
you NEVER do -- because you are cretin -- have no brains for something like that.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me "admitting" being a liar.
Which exactly? ;-)
You see the problem here? No. Because you are cretin.
You babbling just too much. Throwing accusations left and right. Making claims.
But...
after observing for quote a little span of time, even to not so smart opponent it becomes APPARENT -- that all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS.
Just you own cretinic babbling. Manifestation of your cretinic delusions.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: WHY I need to take your quotes as something truthful????
\\Need? You can't. Because you need to lie about them. As a pathological liar.
Yeah...
you are right.
I cannot take as truthful anything such a pathological liar babbling.
But...
again.
That's just an accident.
You cretin DUNNO what you just said -- self-revealingly. ;-P
\\Qtard: Easy to see why. Just couple clarifying questions: And to what it refer to? Why it important? That my(??? you even was NOT ABLE to show that that was MY words... in that quote).
\\Bullshit. Those were DEFINITELY your words. I copied and pasted them from YOUR comment.
Then... PROVE it.
Make PROPERLY ATTRIBUTED quote -- with link to a page and timestamp and nickname.
And with PROPER quote from that comment -- one which will pass Ctrl-F test -- means are word-to-word CORRECT.
And... that would be PROPER FIRST STEP.
But...
you will not...
cause you are cretin.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\To pretend it did not know what I was referring to. But that is just a cretinic game. IT loves playing cretinic games.
Confession? ;-P
Yeah. One of your alter-egos. Cretin IT. Like to play such game. Oftenly. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, I say to that Cretin IT... as well of all other alter-egos of SAMEBODY Derpish SADners. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Quote where you "really commented it", liar.
Yawn.
Go, make proper quote of it... and we'll discuss.
Now... when we BOTH know, that you CAN do it.
Your try to squint from need to provide ProPER QUOTES -- for that for opponent to KNOW what we are talking about, as alone and only purpose -- but... you'd only CONFIRM being cretinic liar...
but...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Because you asked. Well, I knew it was a waste of time. To give you a quote when you ask for it. Because your "and you can quote" is a cretinic game.
Yeah.
NewSpekean again. Trully "cretinic game" means and can mean ONLY "smart game"... because, that is what SCIENTISTS do... when DISCUSS their scientific matters.
And scientists are all-known smartest people.
But... cretin WILL start screeching "all scientists are fools... cretins", yes? %-))))))))))))
Yawn.
\\So, words I wasn't able to prove are yours... they are "my words".
\\ADMISSION of lying!
Yep.
You just admitted lying.
Yawn.
Second time.
After that "in my lifetime" admission. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\Yeah, your crazy babbling\\ Yeah??? And you can QUOTE it? ;-P And argument out it? ;-P And EXPLAIN... how it "crazy babbling"? ;-P Naaaaaah.
\\Right. NO. I just said it's a waste of time to play your cretinic games.
Yep.
NewSpeakean "cretinic games" is lying upside out substitute for "smart/brainiacs games".
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Lie. I did. When I quoted your "I never commented on it". You babbled in response that it was not "properly attributed".
BS.
I just double-checked it.
And here where it appeared, that
\\\\Dodging (not answering question) confirmed.
\\Properly attributed question? ;-P
\\Naaaaah.
\\Because cretin UNABLE to attribute questions properly.
Obviously it was IN RESPONSE to false accusation in "dodging".
HOW I can start answering question -- I cannot see even being properly attributed in my direction and about something I know (or have said, as in this case)?????
That is... either ERROR from side of one who asking -- to which I responded absolutely correctly -- question was wrongly attributed.
Or... that is DELIVERATE deceptove tactic...
but...
with given who said it -- I am sure that that was not deliberate -- just obvious for cretinic liar to babble cretinic BS.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Go use Google for good, will ya??? ;-P
But you will NOT.
Because -- cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
7 Characteristics Of A Good Question
eLearning Industry
https://elearningindustry.com › Articles
Feb 4, 2019 — Concise. A good question is usually crisp and concise. It omits any unnecessary information that requires students to spend time understanding ...
What are the attributes of a good question?
Stack Exchange
https://japanese.meta.stackexchange.com › questions
Apr 5, 2012 — What are the attributes of a good question? · One quality per answer · Provide a brief explanation of why it is important. · Use the comments for ...
9 answers
· 7 votes: State assumptions that you may have made. This helps to either confirm your suspicions or ...
8 Characteristics of Good Questions (With Tips)
Indeed
https://www.indeed.com › ... › Career development
Feb 12, 2024 — Good questions require no questions to understand. They should be self-evident rather than ambiguous and open to interpretations. For example, ...
And many-many more...
Qtard: So... you can only try to "embelish" your crazy babbling with some more crazy babbling... like calling my wise words "crazy babbling". ;-P
You never typed any wise words. And WHY do you put "embelish" in quotes?
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
embellish
/ΙͺmΛbΙlΙͺΚ,ΙmΛbΙlΙͺΚ/
verb
make (something) more attractive by the addition of decorative details or features.
Obviously... it's NOT possible to make BS more attractive with throwing some more BS over it. ;-P
Therefore, DIRECT use of word "embelish"... would be INCORRECT.
That's why I use it inside quotes.
Because that was sarcastic remark.
And you are cretin. Without quotes. And direct claim. ;-P
Ipso facto.
This precisely fact -- that I forced to explain such obvious thing to you, cretin.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Yeah. Your lie was obvious. That there is ANY comparing of him with tRump.
Both are politicians.
Both rivaling with their respective state presidents.
Both persecuted unjustly.
If that not enough... then neither people in History can be compared and comparison discussed.
Like for example calling dRump Hitler. ;-P
But... DEMNs DO THAT comparison.
So... why *I* can't??? Suddenly. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Obviously, there is not and cannot be ANY reason to NOT compare em.
\\Qtard: You are cretin. And you know ZILCH about Navalny.
\\Lie. I know his first name is "Alexi" and he died. But you say that is "zilch"?
That amount can say ANYBODY standing before ANYBODY's grave stone. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Does it counts as "I knew that guy"????
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Your cretinism... is just spectacular. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
\\Qtard: But still bragging, lyingly, that you know a lot.
\\"More than" is not "a lot". It could be. But in this case it isn't.
You just stated (ABOVE^^^^^^^) knowing his name and that he dead.
Obviously, *I*... KNOW more then that.
Do you know what Ceerou Forest is. ;-P (I *deliberately* mangled it... so you would not be able to Google it)
But... if you'd REALLY know *SOMETHING* about Navalny... it would not be a problem to deshiffer. ;-P
\\And he can in NO WAY be compared to donald tRump.
BS.
\\Except they are both humans. That is what you said.
That's just for starter. Just to HIGHLIGHT what ostentatious BS your claim JUST ABOVE *IS*. ;-P
They humans. Therefore. They CAN be compared.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\You MUST be talking about someone else. A person who you have "quote big" knowledge about. But not Alexi Navalny. You dunno even who that is.
Can you recognized him by his foto? By his voice? By his claims and written by him texts? ;-P
And answer is firm "No".
Well "knowing by foto" you can fake after looking into news highlights.
His voice... but you DUNNO Russian.
And all other... totally beyond your reach. ;-P
And you'd have enough self-awareness to NOT CLAIMING knowing something you OBVIOUSLY *dunno*. If you'd not be a cretin.
But you are. So sad. Naaaaah... it is damn funny. And grossly entertaining.
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: \\It gives you insight into your craziness? And is cheaper than going to a psychiatrist? Naaah\\ Giving insightes from own experience? AGAIN!
\\ Asking itself? What did your "samebody alter ego" say?
And you read it that way because?
Because you are crazy? ;-P
\\You didn't scroll up to see I wrote "Euromaidan". You only saw "Euro-maiden" (the first time).
And HOW could I know that Euromaidan and Euromaiden is... ABOUT SAME thing? DIRECTED on me? ABOUT SOMETHING I know and can answer???
HOW????!!!!! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I am NOT one of alter-egos inside your SAMEBODY scull -- and therefore -- I DO NOT share common inside your UNDERSTANDING.
And therefore.
CANNOT deshiffer such a vague references.
SAME.
As I was NOT able to deshiffer your vague reference to "Mockingjay"... or even "Laurence-somebody film".
I meet that word "Mockingjay" FOR THE FIRST TIME... after back-translating it... to depict EPISODE I saw... somewheres, sometimes...
CLEARLY. It NOT ENOUGH to recognize it several months after that... and on such a vague ref.
By the way... movie called "Hunger Games"... which shows JUST some more -- HOW VAGUE and MISLEADING your ref was.
Well.
That same problem is in communication in-between ANY real people (not your split-personalities).
That's why that RULES of DISCUSSING was introduced in the first place -- for people to COULD know what they BOTH(or more around) talking about: stating clear claims, asking correct questions, referring to facts, using logic, discussing faithfully...
\\You tell me. YOU quoted Wikipedia later.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action
It cannot be double-checked???
There is NO such plan in Government websites? In news media?
\\Qtard: Or... for such a cretin as you -- anybody that babbling anything on the Web... is PROOF and FACT???
\\Self referring talks. Obviously. Referring to itself quoting Wikipedia. Linking to a Wikipedia page.
It cannot be double-checked???
There is NO such plan in Government websites? In news media?
\\No. It was (without checking) I think the 53rd time the Biden Administration used the presidential drawdown.
And same time "last one". Because "we ran out of money"... even though some other day other government spokeperson report having 5 billion $ MOAAAR!!!!!!
As well as *limitless* presidential authority to dispense anything out of USA military reserves (and that is... not about that FOR FREE scraps in desert) -- which are 1 F***G TRILLION $ budget... per year.
\\Qtard: Though there is 4 billions $ MOAAAR...
\\No. Cretin don't understand math.
Hah...
Google... already ELIMINATED that news...
Though STILL suggesting "biden 5 billion dollar money for ukraine"
And Bing...
Joe Biden has the power to get critical aid to Ukraine
Biden still has PDA access to around $4.2 billion worth of weapons but stopped sending them in late December. The given ...
\\And republicans are voting on legislation to authorize sending those resources? From the "wirehouses" (as you call them)?
Presidential Executive Authority.
As F***G Commander in Chief!
Or what... Total Cretin will try to argue that dRump/Reps/liliPut/PopeOfRome/Aliens/Whoever CAN stop POTUS from commanding USA military????!!!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Go say it! Out loud! For DEMN MAAAAR lulz. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\That republicans are demanding a vote to send? Legislation that would provide money for the cost of sending those helicopters (which can't be sent for free)?
And who is POTUS (The President of United States)???????????????
Btainless chicken???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Which would cost a lot of money to send. Be a big operation. republicans are voting to authorize that?
Are that "republicans" are party who control State Power in USA?
Like, who's POTUS??? "Repuglican" one? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\And how is your imaginary "demn-ok-ratsy" ironic?\\ And I must explain irony to non-understanding irony cretin???
\\Explain it to yourself? When you dunno what it is? HOW?
Yawn.
And... gibberish cretinism in response.
Yawn.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
\\Qtard: And if I will not... it will start screeching that I "dodging"????
\\Naaahhh. I don't care.
Why you raised that "dodging" as such important issue then???
If you don't care about answer.
Why you so emotional about (your cretinic bullshit) questions not answered????
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Because you are cretin, am I right???
Or... just SoME OthER of SAMEBODY alter-ego AT HELM...
Don Tcare Cretin? ;-P
Nice to meet you, Don Tcare. (and... by the way -- THAT is how MOCKING properly (and ingeniously, fitting MUCH SMARTER opponent title) *done*)
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: \\miserly cretin should say... \\OK. Go ahead and say that then\\ And. YOU said it. ;-P
Lie. I KNEW you would call it "my admission" if I quoted you. Why I did NOT quote you. But you say "YOU said it" anyway. Even though I did NOT.
Qtard: Because YOU are cretin. **cretinic laughter**
No. Your cretinic trick didn't work.
Qtard: \\To me, the "brainiac" from you, the cretin\\ Continue-continue, cretin. **cretinic laughter** Entertaining me. **more cretinic laughter**
Cretin encouraging itself to continue. Like that is necessary.
Qtard: \\To a cretin? It is attributed to ME\\ Yeah... to IT\\ \\No, not you/it. Me\\ Me-cretin? Some YET ONE alter-ego from under rotten scull of Derpish SADners crazy split-personality crackpot? ;-P
You say. Re your alter egos "Me-Cretin" and "Derpish SADners". I thought you said your alter egos weren't aware of each other?
Qtard: \\It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about\\ You PERFECTLY CORRECT this time, cretin IT (or that is cretin ME? or some other cretin???).
None of your cretinic alter egos said that. *I* did. But thanks for admitting I am right.
Qtard: But... that's just an accident and not proof of you cretin understanding what you just said.
You admitted I'm right by accident? "You-cretin" don't understand? OK. I believe you.
Qtard: Just some words you REPEATing after MUCH SMARTER opponent... without understanding. ;-P
Talking to itself?
Qtard: \\Because... as I, as much smarter opponent ALWAYS explaining. That'll be ONLY FIRST STEP -- providing quote. Very NEXT STEP -- argumenting RELEVANCE of that quote. And then -- LOGICAL explanation -- why one gave that quote... and what it should mean\\ Yeah. "what it should mean"\\ Yeah. That's why people talking with each other. Discussing. Arguing about this or that things. But you cretin DUNNO about it, isn't it? ;-P
No, "you-cretin" obviously dunno. Dunno HOW to argue or discuss. Proven by your cretinic claims of me discussing with my "alter egos". When I am (trying) to discuss with IT.
Qtard: \\That is the step where IT lies\\ Yeah. You are PERFECTLY CORRECT, cretin Me. ... That is what your pal, alter-ego cretin IT doing nearly all of the time.
I am not your pal.
Qtard: \\Then (in the last step) inserted lie (what I "really" meant) "em their rights"\\ Was "I deny them having such rights" was NOT your SAMEBODY words too? ;-P
Imaginary rights you made up. NO, the J6 insurrectionists don't have those rights. Because they don't exist TO have.
Qtard: Words you repeated MANY times. While keeping your adamant adherence to em?
Yes. I repeated my words denying the imaginary rights you made up exist. Because they don't.
Qtard: Well... maybe this time it came into your sick scull -- how egregious such claim is -- denying people their Human Rights... it's borderline Nazism. Like what Nazis did to Jews -- DENIED em HAVING any rights.
I've never done that. I strongly support people having their human rights. Though I strongly oppose your imaginary rights. Comparing imaginary rights being "denied" to Nazism and what happened to Jews in Nazi Germany. It is extremely offensive.
I don't have a "scull" either. Thick or thin.
Qtard: \\Because I'm not liar\\ Yeah. Except that times... in your "lifetime"... when you, ITself... admitted lying.
That is proof of my honesty. Not to claim that I have NEVER-EVER lied. Because everyone has lied. Except you? You claim to never lie? Never have lied? In your ENTIRE life?
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Qtard: YET ONE similarity with ITs puppet-master liliPut.
Yeah. Claims to be a never-ever liar. YOU and YOUR puppet master, Putin.
Qtard: \\I don't use your steps for lying. I tell the truth\\ Yeah. Because you can't. Because you are cretin. And UNABLE to follow PROPER steps of discussing things.
Lying is a "proper step" in discussing things? For YOU. Obviously.
Qtard: \\Self referring talks. Though you place the blame for your mangling and lying on your alter ego "you cretin"\\ Yap. PROPER ATTRIBUTION... of ITself... to ITself.
You're attributing those "self referring talks" to yourself? In agreement with me? Thanks.
Qtard: Yeah. I do not speak NewSpeakian.
Lie.
Qtard: And therefore have no habit to name such obvious lies "Truth".
"No habit" in your NewSpeak meaning habitual. ALWAYS calling obvious lies "Truth".
Qtard: \\As if you didn't do that to me FIRST\\Well... you always free to provide quotes and explain why it should be the case.
I JUST did. But you omitted that from my quote. I said "When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me admitting being a liar".
Qtard: But... you NEVER do -- because you are cretin -- have no brains for something like that.
Just did. TWICE. But you ignored it. Because you're a liar.
Qtard: \\When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me "admitting" being a liar\\ Which exactly? ;-)
You're winking. Because YOU KNOW "which exactly".
Qtard: You see the problem here? No. Because you are cretin.
I do see the problem. You're a liar who lies CONSTANTLY.
Qtard: You babbling just too much. Throwing accusations left and right. Making claims.
Truthful claims.
Qtard: after observing for quote a little span of time, even to not so smart opponent it becomes APPARENT -- that all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS.
No. The opposite.
Qtard: Just you own cretinic babbling. Manifestation of your cretinic delusions.
Your cretinic babbling and cretinic delusions.
Qtard: WHY I need to take your quotes as something truthful????\\ Need? You can't. Because you need to lie about them. As a pathological liar\\ Yeah... you are right. I cannot take as truthful anything such a pathological liar babbling.
My comment was about YOU. You said I'm right. But you didn't mean it. Because... liar. Pathologically so.
Qtard: But... again. That's just an accident. You cretin DUNNO what you just said -- self-revealingly. ;-P
Yeah, what your alter ego "You-cretin" said IS self revealing.
Qtard: Easy to see why. Just couple clarifying questions: And to what it refer to? Why it important? That my(??? you even was NOT ABLE to show that that was MY words... in that quote)\\Bullshit. Those were DEFINITELY your words. I copied and pasted them from YOUR comment\\ Then... PROVE it.
What a cretin. Says I need to "prove" what I copied and pasted from IT's comment actually is IT's comment? It is still there. Above. Person who denies comments JUST SAID? That's YOU.
Cretin thinks I should take ITs cretinic challenge that I "prove" ITs words (copied and pasted from THIS thread) are really ITs words -- seriously? Get bent, cretin.
\\No. Your cretinic trick didn't work.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Stated as expert in cretinic tricks? ;-P
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\To a cretin? It is attributed to ME\\ Yeah... to IT\\ \\No, not you/it. Me\\ Me-cretin? Some YET ONE alter-ego from under rotten scull of Derpish SADners crazy split-personality crackpot? ;-P
\\You say. Re your alter egos "Me-Cretin" and "Derpish SADners". I thought you said your alter egos weren't aware of each other?
State your name alter-ego??? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about\\ You PERFECTLY CORRECT this time, cretin IT (or that is cretin ME? or some other cretin???).
\\None of your cretinic alter egos said that. *I* did. But thanks for admitting I am right.
Yeah, cretin. You repeated that claim after MUCH SMARTER opponent. ;-P
\\No, "you-cretin" obviously dunno. Dunno HOW to argue or discuss. Proven by your cretinic claims of me discussing with my "alter egos". When I am (trying) to discuss with IT.
Yeah, trying, unsuccessfully, because DUNNO what rules of discussion are... because cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Imaginary rights you made up. NO, the J6 insurrectionists don't have those rights. Because they don't exist TO have.
Yap.
And you'd be crying AGAIN... "I didn't said I *DO* deny, that is cutted quote"... while you ADAMANTLY SURE... that people can be SEVERED from UNSEVERABLE Human Rights...
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
SAME... like you ADAMANTLY SURE... that people, humans -- CANNOT be compared. Even though they are SAME humans.
Obviously, same kind things CAN be compared with each other -- how otherwise we'd be able to know -- that they are SAME KIND.
That is what our brain do... even without our notice or discretion.
Like recognizing faces.
\\Qtard: \\That is the step where IT lies\\ Yeah. You are PERFECTLY CORRECT, cretin Me. ... That is what your pal, alter-ego cretin IT doing nearly all of the time.
\\I am not your pal.
Of course.
Your other alter-ego INSIDE SAMEBODY scull... pal. ;-P
\\Yes. I repeated my words denying the imaginary rights you made up exist. Because they don't.
SEE!
Denying humans to have UNSEVERABLE Human Rights -- EXACTLY same what Nazis with a Jews.
\\Like what Nazis did to Jews -- DENIED em HAVING any rights.
\\I've never done that.
You DID IT!
Just ABoVE!!!
In previous two excerpts. TWICE in a ROW!!!
YET ONE lie to you OWN words... JUST SAID!!!
That was quote a while. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
You didn't do that, for quite some time.
But... now we back to square one.
You saying UTTERLY NAZIST ANTI-HUMAN BullShit.
Then trying to DENY it. With "I NEVER said it".
Though I provide PERFECTLY CORRECT quotes.
Of your words... JUST SAID.
But... you cretin, cretinicly PRETEND NOT seeing em. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\ It is extremely offensive.
Yeah. Denying Human Rights -- it's extremely offensive.
To any human.
\\I don't have a "scull" either. Thick or thin.
Aha!
Soft scull syndrome? ;-P
Acute soft head syndrome in a sickle cell disease patient
National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › ...
Acute soft head syndrome is an extremely rare complication in children with sickle cell anemia. ... skull pain and swelling. Magnetic Resonance ...
\\Qtard: \\Because I'm not liar\\ Yeah. Except that times... in your "lifetime"... when you, ITself... admitted lying.
\\That is proof of my honesty.
Yeah-yeah-yeah... :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Admitting lying -- is "proof of honesty"... in NewSpeak-verse. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I get it. I really do. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, cretin, chanting self-revealing "proofs of honesty". :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Because everyone has lied.
Yeah.
Motto of liliPut -- your puppet-master. ;-P
\\Qtard: YET ONE similarity with ITs puppet-master liliPut.
\\Yeah. Claims to be a never-ever liar. YOU and YOUR puppet master, Putin.
Yeah.
YET ONE similarity with ITs puppet-master liliPut.
Which first LIED "but, there's NO RFia troops on Crimea peninsula".
Then... ADMITTED it. (like you cretin ADMITTED lying in your "lifetime").
Then AGAIN retracted that lying claim. With "Crimea ALWAYS was Russian".
Yawn.
Then... started accusing all other World... in lying.
Yawn.
But...
continue-continue, cretin, reveal your likeness... with your puppet-master. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Lying is a "proper step" in discussing things? For YOU. Obviously.
If you claim that I do lie... that must be meaning that you know Truth (how else you'd be able to see lies??? Lies are OPPOSITE to a Truth).
And Truth -- are FACTUAL. Means, "knowing truth" means Knowing Facts.
And... when one know FACTS -- one can POINT to em, REFER to em, QUOTE em.
But...
this and all your other such claims -- is miserly lies.
You cretin -- DUNNO what Truth is. Because "Truth it's Lie" to you. And NEVER facts.
Yawn.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\Self referring talks. Though you place the blame for your mangling and lying on your alter ego "you cretin"\\ Yap. PROPER ATTRIBUTION... of ITself... to ITself.
\\You're attributing those "self referring talks" to yourself? In agreement with me? Thanks.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Self-refering talks. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And yeah, use you "self-encouraging" quips too. ;-P
In reference to ITself. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Yeah. I do not speak NewSpeakian.
\\Lie.
Which mean "Truth" in NewSpeakian? Am I correct, with understanding your NewSpeakian babbling? ;-P
\\"No habit" in your NewSpeak meaning habitual. ALWAYS calling obvious lies "Truth".
And... NewSpeakian habitual use of "you" instead of "I".
Yawn.
\\Qtard: \\As if you didn't do that to me FIRST\\Well... you always free to provide quotes and explain why it should be the case.
\\I JUST did.
Yeah.
You lied.
As ever.
Yawn.
\\But you omitted that from my quote. I said "When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me admitting being a liar".
Of course.
Cause that is what quoting mean -- giving THAT excerpt, one directs it's answer to.
NOT everything opponent babbled, which would be cretinic fit.
QUOTING -- is exactly for that -- to point out to PRECISE place and topic in discussion thread.
But... you are cretin, and NEVER able to get it. ;-P
Yawn. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Well.
To the point.
If you think that "you cutted out of context my quote"... you are FREE to give EXAMPLE of CORRECT quote... and EXPLAIN, HOW my was INCORRECT.
But...
you NEVER able to do -- because you are cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Just did. TWICE. But you ignored it. Because you're a liar.
You are FREE to point out -- QUOTE what I ignored.
IF... you think your words are so important, and SO definite in pushing your case.
But... you NEVER do... cause, you are cretin -- and unable to discern, what your/me/anybody's words are important... and what are just miserly babbling. (and well, that is NOT just my word -- that is YOUR OWN admission -- that you Don Tcare ;-P) :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
So... why *I* need to care about YOUR miserly uninformative babbling??? Ahhh???
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: \\When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me "admitting" being a liar\\ Which exactly? ;-)
\\You're winking. Because YOU KNOW "which exactly".
No. I don't.
Just look UP ABOVE this thread webpage -- SEE, how many BABBLING you produced.
HOW??? I can know, to which EXACTLY little verse of this longread of miserly babbling -- you referring... in such a vague manner????????
As you ITself truthfully admitted "Qtard: \\It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about".
And I "winked" just to HIGHLIGHT EXACTLY THIS...
\\Which exactly? ;-)
\\You see the problem here? No. Because you are cretin.
\\You babbling just too much. Throwing accusations left and right. Making claims.
SEE????
COMPLETE QUOTE. Which Explains it.
\\I do see the problem. You're a liar who lies CONSTANTLY.
Then... QUOTE at least ONE my lie -- and REVEAL, HOW it is a lie. ;-P
But...
you can't, because you are cretin and all you such accusations -- is just baseless lies. ;-P
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Drowning in a mud pond of your cretinic lies. ;-P
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Truthful claims.
Yeah. In NewSpeakian. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: after observing for quote a little span of time, even to not so smart opponent it becomes APPARENT -- that all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS.
\\No. The opposite.
Well... then you must be ABLE... to REFER TO SUCH FACTS.
But...
too bad, you never do.
Because...
as miserly cretin -- you still UN-ABLE, to grok what FACTS is.
Still think that that is somebody-somebody talking something-something (like your own cretinic babbling).
Yawn. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Just you own cretinic babbling. Manifestation of your cretinic delusions.
\\Your cretinic babbling and cretinic delusions.
Yeah.
Swift confirmation.
Of MY claim, that "all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS"
But...
you just continue-continue to try to "embelish" your miserly babbling with some MOAAAR miserly babbling. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: WHY I need to take your quotes as something truthful????\\ Need? You can't. Because you need to lie about them. As a pathological liar\\ Yeah... you are right. I cannot take as truthful anything such a pathological liar babbling.
\\My comment was about YOU. You said I'm right.
Yeah.
I ADMITTED you being pathological liar.
Yawn.
So... I just "cannot take as truthful" anything you babble.
Like in this precisely excerpt of your OWN words -- that "Because you need to lie about them" that "you" was directed at me. And was NOT an apparent LIE of pathological liar.
How can I???
While FACTS screaming that YOU cretin are that liar -- liar that LYING about MUCH SMARTER opponent being liar.
Your words full of lies... and you even admitted being liar... so, HOW I can treat em as truthfull.
ESPECIALLY.
As if just THIS excerpt you properly admitted "You can't.".
\\Yeah, what your alter ego "You-cretin" said IS self revealing.
Yeah. Your cretinic alter-ego revealed all truth about ITself. ;-P
\\What a cretin. Says I need to "prove" what I copied and pasted from IT's comment actually is IT's comment?
Yeah.
Like you DID with that "Mockingjay" excerpt.
Or what??? You "NEVER did it"???? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Cretin thinks I should take ITs cretinic challenge that I "prove" ITs words (copied and pasted from THIS thread) are really ITs words -- seriously? Get bent, cretin.
Well... YOU DID IT.
With that "Mockingjay" excerpt. And EVEN with some "mistyping" cases.
From all account... that was a lot of work -- to find em, to make refs to em.
And... YOU DID IT.
And that was GREAT SUCCESS! Not??? ;-P
But well...
you was NOT ABLE to prove -- that that QUOTES... are somehow, damning????
Revealing my lies????
Showing me stupid????
Just confirmed SAME APPARENT and NEVER concealed by me truth -- that I am foreigner, that English NOT native for me and that I DUNNO many trivia obvious to USAians... (like about Laurence-somebody films ;-P)
Congrats, congrats!!!
But...
why you NOT happy? ;-P
Because...
you are cretin? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But that... cannot be fixed. Bare with it. ;-P
Qtard: \\No. Your cretinic trick didn't work\\ **cretinic laughter** Stated as expert in cretinic tricks? **more cretinic laughter**
No. I just identified yours.
Qtard: You say. Re your alter egos "Me-Cretin" and "Derpish SADners". I thought you said your alter egos weren't aware of each other?\\ State your name alter-ego??? ;-P
You're asking yourself? I'll stand by and see if IT answers.
Qtard: \\None of your cretinic alter egos said that. *I* did. But thanks for admitting I am right\\ Yeah, cretin. You repeated that claim after MUCH SMARTER opponent. ;-P
Comment to yourself about me, the much smarter opponent?
Qtard: \\No, "you-cretin" obviously dunno. Dunno HOW to argue or discuss. Proven by your cretinic claims of me discussing with my "alter egos". When I am (trying) to discuss with IT\\ Yeah, trying, unsuccessfully, because DUNNO what rules of discussion are... because cretin. **cretinic laughter**
"Rules of discussion"? Yeah, you don't know them.
Google "What are the three rules of discussion?". Listen actively and with an ear to understanding others' views. (Don't just think about what you are going to say while someone else is talking.) Criticize ideas, not individuals. Commit to learning, not debating.
Qtard: \\Imaginary rights you made up. NO, the J6 insurrectionists don't have those rights. Because they don't exist TO have\\ Yap. And you'd be crying AGAIN... "I didn't said I *DO* deny, that is cutted quote"... while you ADAMANTLY SURE... that people can be SEVERED from UNSEVERABLE Human Rights...
I am adamantly sure they cannot. The real ones.
Qtard: SAME... like you ADAMANTLY SURE... that people, humans -- CANNOT be compared. Even though they are SAME humans.
I meant in the way you thought they could be compared. Like dotard donald and Alexi Navalny -- on the basis of them both being "politically persecuted". When both are not.
Qtard: Obviously, same kind things CAN be compared with each other -- how otherwise we'd be able to know -- that they are SAME KIND.
You compared those two people for a SPECIFIC reason. To claim (incorrectly and lyingly) that they are both politically persecuted.
Qtard: That is what your pal, alter-ego cretin IT doing nearly all of the time\\ I am not your pal\\ Of course. Your other alter-ego INSIDE SAMEBODY scull... pal. ;-P
I don't have any.
Qtard: \\Yes. I repeated my words denying the imaginary rights you made up exist. Because they don't\\ SEE! Denying humans to have UNSEVERABLE Human Rights -- EXACTLY same what Nazis with a Jews.
No. Never did.
Qtard: \\Like what Nazis did to Jews -- DENIED em HAVING any rights.
False comparisons again. Like Navalny with tRump. J6 insurrectionists with Jews in Nazi Germany. It is incredibly offensive.
Qtard: \\I've never done that\\ You DID IT! Just ABoVE!!! In previous two excerpts. TWICE in a ROW!!!
NO. I did not.
Qtard: YET ONE lie to you OWN words... JUST SAID!!!
No. You lie.
Qtard: That was quote a while. **cretinic laughter** You didn't do that, for quite some
time.
NEVER did.
Qtard: But... now we back to square one.
Yes. You lying about a "right" you made up. Lying about it being an unseverable human right. When it isn't.
Qtard: You saying UTTERLY NAZIST ANTI-HUMAN BullShit.
No.
Qtard: Then trying to DENY it. With "I NEVER said it".
The only other option would be to admit it. But WHY would I admit saying something I never said?
Qtard: Though I provide PERFECTLY CORRECT quotes. Of your words... JUST SAID.
Yeah, me denying that your fake "human right" is a human right.
Qtard: But... you cretin, cretinicly PRETEND NOT seeing em. **cretinic laughter**
No pretending. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for me to "see" something that didn't happen.
Qtard: \\It is extremely offensive.\\ Yeah. Denying Human Rights -- it's extremely offensive. To any human.
Also making up new ones. Lying about this made up "human right" being unseverable. That's offensive too.
Qtard: \\I don't have a "scull" either. Thick or thin\\ Aha! Soft scull syndrome? ;-P
There is no such thing.
Qtard: Acute soft head syndrome in a sickle cell disease patient national Institutes of Health (NIH) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Acute soft head syndrome is an extremely rare complication in children with sickle cell anemia. ... skull pain and swelling. Magnetic Resonance ...
A "scull" and a "skull" are different things. Check out a dictionary. There is NO SUCH THING as "soft scull syndrome".
Qtard: \\Because I'm not liar\\ Yeah. Except that times... in your "lifetime"... when you, ITself... admitted lying. \\That is proof of my honesty\\ Yeah-yeah-yeah... **cretinic laughter** Admitting lying -- is "proof of honesty"... in NewSpeak-verse. **cretinic laughter** I get it. I really do. **cretinic laughter**
NO, you don't get it. AT ALL. Due to EXTREME cretinity. As I already pointed out, everyone has lied. Yet you, due to cretinity, thinks there is such a thing as a person who has NEVER lied. No doubt you think you are such a person. Despite you doing it ALL THE TIME. CONSTANTLY.
Qtard: YET ONE similarity with ITs puppet-master liliPut. Which first LIED "but, there's NO RFia troops on Crimea peninsula". Then... ADMITTED it. (like you cretin ADMITTED lying in your "lifetime"). Then AGAIN retracted that lying claim. With "Crimea ALWAYS was Russian". Yawn. Then... started accusing all other World... in lying. Yawn. But... continue-continue, cretin, reveal your likeness... with your puppet-master. **cretinic laughter**
Yeah, and what country did I lie about invading? Name the country.
And why don't you admit that you've lied? OR -- tell me that you have never-ever lied in your entire life. But I guarantee you won't answer. Maybe use your "question isn't properly attributed" dodge?
Qtard: \\Lying is a "proper step" in discussing things? For YOU. Obviously\\ If you claim that I do lie... that must be meaning that you know Truth (how else you'd be able to see lies??? Lies are OPPOSITE to a Truth). And Truth -- are FACTUAL. Means, "knowing truth" means Knowing Facts. And... when one know FACTS -- one can POINT to em, REFER to em, QUOTE em.
Or remember them. But you obviously can't.
Qtard: But... this and all your other such claims -- is miserly lies. You cretin -- DUNNO what Truth is. Because "Truth it's Lie" to you. And NEVER facts.
Self referring talks.
Qtard: \\Yeah. I do not speak NewSpeakian\\ Lie\\ Which mean "Truth" in NewSpeakian? Am I correct, with understanding your NewSpeakian babbling? ;-P
No. You're wrong.
Qtard: \\"No habit" in your NewSpeak meaning habitual. ALWAYS calling obvious lies "Truth"\\ And... NewSpeakian habitual use of "you" instead of "I".
I didn't write "you" at all.
"No habit" in your NewSpeak meaning habitual. ALWAYS calling obvious lies "Truth".
Nope. ZERO occurrences of the word "you" in the above text.
Qtard: \\As if you didn't do that to me FIRST\\Well... you always free to provide quotes and explain why it should be the case\\I JUST did\\ Yeah. You lied. As ever.
NewSpeakian habitual use of "you" instead of "I". As ever.
Qtard: \\But you omitted that from my quote. I said "When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me admitting being a liar"\\ Of course. Cause that is what quoting mean -- giving THAT excerpt, one directs it's answer to. NOT everything opponent babbled, which would be cretinic fit. QUOTING -- is exactly for that -- to point out to PRECISE place and topic in discussion thread.
You omitted the part where I said I have never lied in discussions with you on this blog. For obvious reasons. But you say "that what quoting mean"? Taking out of context? Then why do you whine when (you say) I do it?
Qtard: But... you are cretin, and NEVER able to get it. ;-P
Self referring talks.
Qtard: Well. To the point. If you think that "you cutted out of context my quote"... you are FREE to give EXAMPLE of CORRECT quote... and EXPLAIN, HOW my was INCORRECT.
I was referring to the fact that there is no person who has never lied. I said I have never lied in my discussions with you on this blog. But not never-ever in my entire life. BUT you (due to being a very dishonest person) say that is an "admission" of being a liar. When I just admitted to being a human.
Qtard: \\Just did. TWICE. But you ignored it. Because you're a liar\\You are FREE to point out -- QUOTE what I ignored.
That I said I never lied in discussions with you on this blog.
Qtard: IF... you think your words are so important, and SO definite in pushing your case. But... you NEVER do... cause, you are cretin -- and unable to discern, what your/me/anybody's words are important... and what are just miserly babbling. (and well, that is NOT just my word -- that is YOUR OWN admission -- that you Don Tcare ;-P)
No. I never made any such admission. Or can you quote it? Explain why you my words as an "admission"? But you probably won't.
Qtard: So... why *I* need to care about YOUR miserly uninformative babbling??? Ahhh???
There isn't any such "babbling" for you to care or not care about.
Qtard: \\When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me "admitting" being a liar\\ Which exactly? ;-)\\You're winking. Because YOU KNOW "which exactly"\\
No. I don't.
Because you're a cretin. Yeah, but also a liar. You know. Otherwise why wink?
Qtard: Just look UP ABOVE this thread webpage -- SEE, how many BABBLING you produced.
I see lots of babbling from you. Moronic babbling that goes on and on about Euromaidan/Euromaiden/Euro-maiden that never had to happen. You could have just answered. But chose to babble endlessly instead.
Qtard: HOW??? I can know, to which EXACTLY little verse of this longread of miserly babbling -- you referring... in such a vague manner????????
Because YOU quoted it. The first part. Left off the second part for obvious reason. Yet you claim to not know. Which is NOT believable. At all.
Qtard: \\But you omitted that from my quote. I said "When you cutted out of context my quote to make a false claim about me admitting being a liar"\\ Of course. Cause that is what quoting mean -- giving THAT excerpt, one directs it's
Qtard: As you ITself truthfully admitted "Qtard: \\It is natural for a cretin to babble incoherently so that much smarter opponent dunno what IT is talking about". And I "winked" just to HIGHLIGHT EXACTLY THIS... \\Which exactly? ;-) \\You see the problem here? No. Because you are cretin.
Yeah. I dunno what you're babbling about. Due to your cretinity.
Qtard: \\You babbling just too much. Throwing accusations left and right. Making claims. SEE???? COMPLETE QUOTE. Which Explains it.
No. I see no explaining.
Qtard: Then... QUOTE at least ONE my lie -- and REVEAL, HOW it is a lie. ;-P
Right here:
Quote: HOW??? I can know, to which EXACTLY little verse of this longread of miserly babbling -- you referring... in such a vague manner????????
That is a lie. No "vague manner". I referred to the quote where you say I "admitted" to being a liar. That isn't "vague". It is a reference to a specific quote.
Qtard: ...you can't, because you are cretin and all you such accusations -- is just baseless lies. ;-P
Can. Just did.
Qtard: Drowning in a mud pond of your cretinic lies. ;-P
Self referring talks.
Qtard: \\Truthful claims\\ Yeah. In NewSpeakian.
Your NewSpeak.
Qtard: after observing for quote a little span of time, even to not so smart opponent it becomes APPARENT -- that all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS\\No. The opposite. Well... then you must be ABLE... to REFER TO SUCH FACTS. But... too bad, you never do.
I do.
Qtard: Because... as miserly cretin -- you still UN-ABLE, to grok what FACTS is.
Self referring talks.
Qtard: Still think that that is somebody-somebody talking something-something (like your own cretinic babbling).
Example of cretinic babbling.
Qtard: Just you own cretinic babbling. Manifestation of your cretinic delusions\\ Your cretinic babbling and cretinic delusions\\ Yeah. Swift confirmation. Of MY claim, that "all your such claim and accusations -- they are BASE-LESS"
Just gave you an example of your cretinic babbling.
Quote: Still think that that is somebody-somebody talking something-something (like your own cretinic babbling)
What does the HELL does this mean? It's just babbling.
Qtard: you just continue-continue to try to "embelish" your miserly babbling with some MOAAAR miserly babbling.
"Embellish" is spelled with TWO "L"s.
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: \\No. Your cretinic trick didn't work\\ **cretinic laughter** Stated as expert in cretinic tricks? **more cretinic laughter**
\\ No. I just identified yours.
Identified?
Then EXPLAIN. ;-P
But...
you can't, because you are cretin.
And using words meaning of which DUNNO. ;-P
\\You're asking yourself? I'll stand by and see if IT answers.
Your SAMEBODY alter-ego IT? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Comment to yourself about me, the much smarter opponent?
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Please, continue-continue... calling ITself "much smarter opponent", cretin. 'Cause -- most hilarious. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\"Rules of discussion"? Yeah, you don't know them.
And you do? So that you doing such a burrish claim? ;-P
Naaaah.
You just a cretin, that continue-continue burrish baseless babbling.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Google "What are the three rules of discussion?". Listen actively and with an ear to understanding others' views. (Don't just think about what you are going to say while someone else is talking.) Criticize ideas, not individuals. Commit to learning, not debating.
Yeah.
That's basics.
But... what of that you DID understood, cretin? ;-P
\\I am adamantly sure they cannot. The real ones.
Yap.
SAME as Nazis said... that Jews are NOT real humans... and therefore have NO rights of such. ;-P
Thanky-thanky for confirming being like Nazi, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\I meant in the way you thought they could be compared. Like dotard donald and Alexi Navalny -- on the basis of them both being "politically persecuted". When both are not.
Because Navalny already dead? And therefore NO politically persecuted anymore? ;-P
\\You compared those two people for a SPECIFIC reason. To claim (incorrectly and lyingly) that they are both politically persecuted.
Yeah?
And what's wrong with that?
BOTH of then was standing before respective courts.
BOTH claimed NOT GUILTY... and whole crowds of their followers sure that that was politically defined.
\\I don't have any.
Yeah.
And that is DEFINITE symptom of split-personality disorder. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Yes. I repeated my words denying the imaginary rights you made up exist. Because they don't\\ SEE! Denying humans to have UNSEVERABLE Human Rights -- EXACTLY same what Nazis with a Jews.
\\No. Never did.
And now you trying to DENY Holocaust... yes, totalitarian cretin and neo-nazi? ;-P
\\False comparisons again. Like Navalny with tRump. J6 insurrectionists with Jews in Nazi Germany. It is incredibly offensive.
Yeah.
To Jews.
But... as if you doing it for FIRST time.
Accusing/bad-naming Jews... like for "genocide of Palestinians".
\\Qtard: \\I've never done that\\ You DID IT! Just ABoVE!!! In previous two excerpts. TWICE in a ROW!!!
\\NO. I did not.
Some OTHER of SAMEBODY written that cretinic quips???
One that can be Ctrl-Fed: "Imaginary rights you made up. NO, the J6 insurrectionists don't have those rights. Because they don't exist TO have"
Yeah.
That's it.
That was written by SAME
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
in comment with timestamp
\\March 20, 2024 at 2:17 PM
Just a day before yesterday.
But...
THAT SAME \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
NOW saying "NO. I did not."
HOW that can be????????????
Memory lapses???
Deliberate cretinic lie???
Some other of SAMEBODY alter-ego... have written this and that words???? ;-P
\\Qtard: YET ONE lie to you OWN words... JUST SAID!!!
\\No. You lie.
Yeah.
You lie.
Cretinicly.
Against OBVIOIUS FACT.
Yawn.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\The only other option would be to admit it. But WHY would I admit saying something I never said?
AGAIN trying to lie... that you "never said"... because you have written it?
HERE.
In THIS blog.
In THIS thread.
Just couple days AGO.
What a cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
And that is...
That same lies you ADMITTED doing... in your "lifetime"??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Yeah, me denying that your fake "human right" is a human right.
And that is...
Walking by streets?
Entering into public building?
Asking questions?
NOT a Human Right? "Fake" Human Right.
Well.
You are DEFINITELY totalitarian cretin and nazy-commie totalitarian rule lover.
What a filthy human you are... Bleh.
But still... I ADMIT you being human. And admit you have Human Rights. Never the less.
\\No pretending. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for me to "see" something that didn't happen.
Yeah.
Because that time your body was under control of SAMEBODY but OTHER of your cretinic allter-egos.
And it is known, that alter-egos of split-personality disorder infested body -- do not remember what other alter-egos did and saw.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: \\I don't have a "scull" either. Thick or thin\\ Aha! Soft scull syndrome? ;-P
\\There is no such thing.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Definitely have one -- why else such a strong denial? ;-P
\\A "scull" and a "skull" are different things. Check out a dictionary.
Dictinaries... just need to catch up to a popular frequent use of it. ;-p
\\Qtard: \\Because I'm not liar\\ Yeah. Except that times... in your "lifetime"... when you, ITself... admitted lying. \\That is proof of my honesty\\ Yeah-yeah-yeah... **cretinic laughter** Admitting lying -- is "proof of honesty"... in NewSpeak-verse. **cretinic laughter** I get it. I really do. **cretinic laughter**
\\NO, you don't get it. AT ALL. Due to EXTREME cretinity. As I already pointed out, everyone has lied.
Yeah.
That is idea that lying scum liliPut trying to push through with his propaganda.
And you are crazy puppet of that puppet-master liliPut -- pushing his message TOO.
\\Yet you, due to cretinity, thinks there is such a thing as a person who has NEVER lied. No doubt you think you are such a person. Despite you doing it ALL THE TIME. CONSTANTLY.
Yeah.
I not lying.
Good that you was able to ADMIT that factual truth. ;-P
Naaaaah.
Of course, that is just an accident.
Despite it being truthful... but you meaned to say it in NewSpeak.
Like "people who ALWAYS saying Truth"... while "Truth... it's Lie". In NewSpeak.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Or remember them. But you obviously can't.
Well... NOBODY can remember ALL facts... like Truth about whereabout of ALL atoms in Universe... in all of its lifetime. Only Universe itself.
Yawn.
Because. Universe consist of 10^80 atoms... scientists say. And exist for 14 billion years.
That's why wise people learned hoe to account facts... by writing em out. And then referring to that notes. Via QUOTING.
Yawn.
But... you cretin, still think and call it "cretinic tricks".
Yawn.
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\You omitted the part where I said I have never lied in discussions with you on this blog. For obvious reasons.
Yeah.
MOST obvious.
Because you lying just too often.
Yawn.
\\I was referring to the fact that there is no person who has never lied.
Ehm???
FACT????
There is 8 billion people on the Earth. Only ones who living TODAY.
And some more billions of who lived before.
AND... nobody accounted EVERY LITTLE thing that they said... and double-checked it for lies.
So... even if there'd be a person... that, as you liar demand (to embalish your cretinic lies) LITERARY... NEVER LIED.
How'd one could know it? As fact?
But...
never the less.
There IS such facts.
UNDENYABLE.
Baby infants.
People who are deaf, unable to speak... they obviously cannot SAY untruth.
\\I said I have never lied in my discussions with you on this blog.
Which is OBVIOUS.
AGAINST the FACTS.
Lie.
Yawn.
\\But not never-ever in my entire life. BUT you (due to being a very dishonest person) say that is an "admission" of being a liar. When I just admitted to being a human.
Yawn.
Being cretin... is also damn to usual... among humans.
Also having split-personality disoreder... %-)))))
But...
you trying lyingly OPPOSE to that FACTUAL truth that you are cretinic liar.
Because "lying is in human nature"? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But...
why people do despise liars and lying SO MUCH... if that is so natural? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Just did. TWICE. But you ignored it. Because you're a liar\\You are FREE to point out -- QUOTE what I ignored.
\\That I said I never lied in discussions with you on this blog.
Rightfully so.
Because you LYING nearly all of the time.
And DEMN too obvious lies.
Against OBVIOUS VISIBLE facts.
Like that "Sun is in the sky". ;-P
\\No. I never made any such admission. Or can you quote it? Explain why you my words as an "admission"? But you probably won't.
Just in THIS thread.
Just a few days BEFORE.
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: And if I will not... it will start screeching that I "dodging"????
\\ Naaahhh. I don't care.
\\March 19, 2024 at 5:51 PM
Or what????
Some other of SAMEBODY alter-egos babbled it?
So you... CURRENT alter-ego -- DUNNO about it? ;-P
And when this my comment will be read by SAMEBODY... but SOME oTHER alter-ego AGAIN.
IT will be claiming... not seeing it? not remembering it? not understanding it? ;-P
But...
continue-continue, split-person cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: So... why *I* need to care about YOUR miserly uninformative babbling??? Ahhh???
\\There isn't any such "babbling" for you to care or not care about.
Like 60+ comments in this thread only.
Rough half of which filled to a brim of your bullshit babbling.
COUNTER-FACTUAL lie... AGAIN!
But...
continue-continue, lying, cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Because you're a cretin. Yeah, but also a liar. You know. Otherwise why wink?
That. EXPLAINEd in FULL comment.
But you KEEP trying to chop my FULL and CONCISE comment into small and smaller, up to becaming unintelligible pieces. And declare em meaning something else.
What an obviously cretinic tactic.
Obviously... you trying to fool me with it, to make me say something wring, to catch me on my word and declare it sure win. ;-P
But...
continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: Just look UP ABOVE this thread webpage -- SEE, how many BABBLING you produced.
\\I see lots of babbling from you.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Easy to understand your mistake -- I CITE your misrly babbling... maybe too much. ;-P
\\Moronic babbling that goes on and on about Euromaidan/Euromaiden/Euro-maiden that never had to happen. You could have just answered. But chose to babble endlessly instead.
I.
Properly.
Stated.
That I DUNNO about EuroMaidEn. ;-P
And why you babbling endlessly about it -- I dunno too. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Because YOU quoted it. The first part. Left off the second part for obvious reason. Yet you claim to not know. Which is NOT believable. At all.
And???
What EXACTLY I quoted wrongly??? By your thought.
HOW I can know to what your referring??? What you believe or not believe???
On such a vague ref. ;-P
*I*.
Even double-checked it.
Crtl-Fed that "first part" you refering to... but found NO mentions... in this whole thread.
?????
\\\\You see the problem here? No. Because you are cretin.
\\Yeah. I dunno what you're babbling about. Due to your cretinity.
Yeah.
And you admitted DUNNO it.
Because you ARE cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Well...
and it's easy to see why -- you MANGLED quote... to level of nonrecognition.
Means -- you habitually fooling ITself. While trying to fool other.
That's is the reason why you grown such an ostentatious cretin.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\No. I see no explaining.
Yeah.
Because you ARE cretin.
Bear with it. ;-P
\\Qtard: Then... QUOTE at least ONE my lie -- and REVEAL, HOW it is a lie. ;-P
\\Right here:
\\Quote: HOW??? I can know, to which EXACTLY little verse of this longread of miserly babbling -- you referring... in such a vague manner????????
\\That is a lie. No "vague manner".
To you???
Yeah. CAUSE you KNOW to what YOU referring to.
I??? HOW *I* can know????
Only through CORRECT UNAMBIGUOUS reference.
\\I referred to the quote where you say I "admitted" to being a liar. That isn't "vague". It is a reference to a specific quote.
There is TONS of such quotes... where "you say I "admitted" to being a liar."
I make em on span of months... ALREADY.
WHICH one???? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Qtard: ...you can't, because you are cretin and all you such accusations -- is just baseless lies. ;-P
\\Can. Just did.
Naaaah.
You -- not.
You only made MORE VAGUE. ;-P
\\Self referring talks.
Say... you might be VERY HAPPy... to repeat after MUCH SMARTER opponent... his words, you see as smart? ;-P
\\Example of cretinic babbling.
Say... you might be VERY HAPPy... to repeat after MUCH SMARTER opponent... his words, you see as smart? ;-P
\\Just gave you an example of your cretinic babbling.
Say... you might be VERY HAPPy... to repeat after MUCH SMARTER opponent... his words, you see as smart? ;-P
\\Quote: Still think that that is somebody-somebody talking something-something (like your own cretinic babbling)
\\What does the HELL does this mean? It's just babbling.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Poor poor cretin. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Have problems with understaning even SO SIMPLE things. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\"Embellish" is spelled with TWO "L"s.
Like I caRRe. ;-P
And...
you cretin think I NOT SEE...
how you CEASED to discuss "I know more about Navalny than you"? ;-P
Why so??? ;-P
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Isn't because you know it -- that you LOST it. ;-P
No.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
NewSpeak "Yes"!
Yawn.
Post a Comment