Well. There is one question which bothers me for a long time -- why Ams do call their USA... an empire? That is preposterous. And rediculous. From the standpoint of real ones. And from historical perspective. Is there something it based on? Apart from unadvised wishful thinking?
\\We hold every country colored "red" hostage. But... that is not what Empires do. Great Rome controlling trade? Ottomans collecting mere sea-crossing fee. Not surprising that True Empores, even though long long as declined, seeing you as counterfacte.
So there are no "business" empires?
\\This is the ancient Greek way. Was Greace an empire? Ever?
No, but little "parts" of it, like Macedon, were. You've heard of Alexander the Great? That was the result of Xenophon's "Anabasis" and an "Athenian" tutor (Aristotle).
\\The Roman way was to take the children of their allies "hostage" and raise them in Rome. Welcome to the American University system. Yeah. But not only that. They was taking em as soldiers. And payed with citizenship.
Yes, we have ways of allowing foreigners to "earn" citizenship.
France -- doing it. You -- not. France -- empire, well kinda, was. You -- not. And well. That is not YOUR system. British one.
Yes, we're doing it more "cleverly". We do it with business. That way the slaves hug their chains. Even the Russian oligarch's are "dying to business" with the West.
The "capitalist discourse" IS the new/ UNIVERSAL "Master Discourse".
"It is concentration of capitals already formed, destruction of their individual independence, expropriation of capitalist by capitalist, transformation of many small into few large capitals.... Capital grows in one place to a huge mass in a single hand, because it has in another place been lost by many.... The battle of competition is fought by cheapening of commodities. The cheapness of commodities demands, ceteris paribus, on the productiveness of labour, and this again on the scale of production. Therefore, the larger capitals beat the smaller. It will further be remembered that, with the development of the capitalist mode of production, there is an increase in the minimum amount of individual capital necessary to carry on a business under its normal conditions. The smaller capitals, therefore, crowd into spheres of production which Modern Industry has only sporadically or incompletely got hold of. Here competition rages.... It always ends in the ruin of many small capitalists, whose capitals partly pass into the hands of their conquerors, partly vanish.
Google is better equiped to give you etimology of word "empire". Or... maybe Nigero/TC could show his intellect... even if for this one time. ;-P
\\No, but little "parts" of it, like Macedon, were. You've heard of Alexander the Great? That was the result of Xenophon's "Anabasis" and an "Athenian" tutor (Aristotle).
Well... that is like Napoleon and France. But well, what country he created as his heritage? Nortern Macedonia? :-)))
\\Yes, we have ways of allowing foreigners to "earn" citizenship.
Everybody have... that ways. But only true empires have ways of empires. ;-)
\\Yes, we're doing it more "cleverly". We do it with business. That way the slaves hug their chains. Even the Russian oligarch's are "dying to business" with the West.
Or... you like to think that way... ;-) Well, again, that is what everybody doing. Every country. No matter how little. Even separate region/county in it. Separate town/village. Have own ideas and things they think they excel in. ;-)
\\The "capitalist discourse" IS the new/ UNIVERSAL "Master Discourse".
:-)))) Go say it to Putin. Xi? Even Un looking at your condescendedly. ;-P
\\Was Marx wrong?
Are you serious?
\\So I favor laws that limit the accumulation of capital. Bigger is the enemy of "big enough". It becomes "too big to fail".
That is motto of Socialists. ;-P Are you really on that Dark path downhill?
I think his "ceteris paribus" caveat in that passage pretty much negates the point he was trying to make. Marx, much like our retarded acolyte Q here, requires his opinions to be based on "a certain point of view" rather than just based in reality like everybody else. The "ceteris paribus" there is telling us to ignore observable phenomena that make Marx's premise false. "All other things being the same and unchanged" describes absolutely nothing in the universe, much less economics and market forces.
\\Anonymous (((TC))) said... The Economic Calculation Problem is a hurdle Marxism will never overcome.
rofl :-))))) Like they ever tryed or wanted to try. :-)))))))))))))))))
That all is idea of Control. Of hogging ALL power to themself. Economical problems??? Oh, come on. Who cares.
Why you do not undertand that... while that is so close to your modus operadndi. Oh, yes, because you are idiot. :-))))) I forgot.
\\much like our retarded acolyte Q here, requires his opinions to be based on "a certain point of view" rather than just based in reality like everybody else.
Oh yeah, you cannot allow even slightest chance to demonstrate what a hopeless idiot you are to slip out of your... pseudopodias, isn't it, Nigero? :-)))))
Ability to reconsile situation from different POV is must have... to anything that want to claim having a baige "sapienti est". ;-P
And. Even that ancient beardy greeks knew that there is NO posibility to percieve reality directly. Everybody doing it through distorted glasses of their prejudges and biases, their language obscurity, deficiency of their mind. ;-P
Do you know about daltonics?
That is... you have daltonism of mind. ;-P Poor thing. Dog that cannot see a rainbow.
\\The "ceteris paribus" there is telling us to ignore observable phenomena that make Marx's premise false.
Go say it, genius. "The battle of competition is fought by cheapening of commodities. The cheapness of commodities demands, ceteris paribus, on the productiveness of labour, and this again on the scale of production."
How you can make products cheaper (in a long run) WITHOUT productivness of labour rised???
\\ "All other things being the same and unchanged" describes absolutely nothing in the universe, much less economics and market forces.
Yep. Zero understanding of meaning. And only playing with "true meaning of words". (yawn)
What is your background? Lawyer? Librarian? Herbalist? :-)))) I dunno, where such rigidity and narrowness of mind could be benefitional, for which profession? Ah, I know, university professor in some obscure and unappreceated field. Like English literature. ;-P
You seem to keep forgetting that you are an imbecile, Q. Your failures to understand English wouldn't be so delightfully comical if you didn't wheeze so much about your illiteracy being other people's fault.
How you can make products cheaper (in a long run) WITHOUT productivness of labour rised???
Do you mind posting this question in a language that you actually understand? Or do you make grammatical and spelling errors in your primitive tribe's squawking also?
The way you phrased your question appears to be a defense of Marx, so I'm asking for clarification to see which flavor of stupid you're serving today.
Needless to say, Marx himself never made anything but bastard kids and vomit stains on broken furniture, so I'm a little skeptical about the "value" of his "labor" in an economics discussion.
\\You seem to keep forgetting that you are an imbecile, Q.
Best wishes to you too. My little pet-skunky. Your morning (or that is evening, midday, midnight?) pss-pss odors of idioticus anonimous as always do smell distinctively.
\\Your failures to understand English wouldn't be so delightfully comical if you didn't wheeze so much about your illiteracy being other people's fault.
Ya mamma was wise, teaching you that wisdom of idiots: "To conceal that you are idiot, when people revealing that you are fool the best tactic is to scream 'no, you are fool' at them and run away". :-))))))))))))))))))
\\Do you mind posting this question in a language that you actually understand?
You yourself claimed that you DO NOT understand any other language. Apart from English. But English words in not that obvious and apparent to your deficient mind order makes you flabbergasted too. Go figure, what language you actually understand. Oh, I know. Only simple words. Only short sentences. Look child. This is a dog. Dog saying -- bark-bark-bark. What saying a dog? Good girl.
\\ Or do you make grammatical and spelling errors in your primitive tribe's squawking also?
You mean mistypings? All of the time. But. Unlike in your cranky lang, brittlness of which poses such an enormous problem for a mind-deficient people like you, there is error-correction built-in. ;-P
\\The way you phrased your question appears to be a defense of Marx,
Yeah. Strawmaning all way down. :-)))) Marx do not need my defence. He was product of his time. And his errors stem of that fact. That that all kinds of mind-deficient fellows to whom it was impossible to grike him and correct his errs -- how he can be responsible for that?
\\ so I'm asking for clarification to see which flavor of stupid you're serving today.
O.K. Read by my lips. :-))) Is there other way? To make products cheaper. Without rising productivity of laibour.
\\Needless to say, Marx himself never made anything but bastard kids and vomit stains on broken furniture, so I'm a little skeptical about the "value" of his "labor" in an economics discussion.
:-))))))))))))))))) Humor of idiots. Please, continue. I collecting such things.
I asked for you to switch to a language you actually understand, assuming you could spell and use correct grammar in that language enough for Google to translate it to English. I'm really not interested in reading you struggle with proclaiming how much you like to have sex with animals in English. It was a chance for you to demonstrate intellectual honesty, the same intellectual honesty you demonstrated when you admitted that you actually are an imbecile.
I understand you don't want to reveal what language or nation you are from. I would also feel embarrassed if I were from a non-American shithole like you are. But please understand this is unavoidable, it doesn't really matter which non-American shithole you are from, it is still going to be inferior to America and Americans. There is no argument here, we both know you're from an inferior non-American culture that likes to have sex with animals. You've insisted upon that fact and belabored that point so much that it isn't even controversial. You're a non-American that likes to have sex with animals. Your inarticulateness is not my fault. If you're trying to say something else, perhaps you should say it in a language you actually understand.
In as much as you might have something to talk about other than your love of having sex with animals, I am hopeful you can communicate effectively in the language of the inferior and pathetic culture you are actually from, and know more words, enough to expand your capacity for dialogue with your betters. I am optimistic that you will eventually realize animals don't speak English and will seek consensual bestiality elsewhere.
Until then, between your repetitive declarations that you like to sexually molest animals, all I'm getting from you is a defense of Marx's idea that the costs of products are decreased by an increase in labor productivity. Perhaps like Marx, you've never run or even worked in a factory so you have no idea what you're talking about. Needless to say, labor is not the only cost to production, nor is it the primary determinate of the price of a produced good. Marx refutes himself with his "ceteris paribus" caveat... Marx is correct if we ignore all the things he asks us to ignore that make his declaration wrong. Reducing his nonsense to an indefensible tautology. Marx is wrong because actual factories can not ignore the things his "ceteris paribus" ignores...energy costs, material costs, logistical and distribution costs, marketing costs, regulatory costs, and so on. It is exactly as if Marx didn't know what he was talking about once he was done fantasizing about killing bosses and property owners. Stupid can not be made not-stupid. Marx wanted to ignore what he couldn't understand, that's all. You wouldn't run a factory with Marxism any more than you would plan a budget without knowledge of math.
\\Needless to say, labor is not the only cost to production
No. It is ONLY. Costs of ANY product defined by labour. Even if it ore -- that is cost of digging it out. Even if it some freebie found on the sea shore -- that is cost of delivering it to a market.
Yet again, you demonstrated that you are nothing more than Know Nothing Wordy Idiot, Nigero.
\\Marx is wrong because actual factories can not ignore the things his "ceteris paribus" ignores...energy costs, material costs, logistical and distribution costs, marketing costs, regulatory costs, and so on.
And how increase of effectivness CAN increase this other costs??? :-)))))
\\Stupid can not be made not-stupid.
Yep. Once in a while you can spout something that is undeniably true. But well, that is accident. Like with that monkeys typing British Encyclopedia. :-))) You still unable to understand -- that there is things that you do not understand. At all. To find knowledge, one need to admit adsence of knowledge first. ;-) But that simple truth mind of an idiots inclined to avoid at all cost.
\\I understand you don't want to reveal what language or nation you are from. I would also feel embarrassed if I were from a non-American shithole like you are. But please understand this is unavoidable, it doesn't really matter which non-American shithole you are from, it is still going to be inferior to America and Americans. There is no argument here, we both know you're from an inferior non-American culture that likes to have sex with animals. You've insisted upon that fact and belabored that point so much that it isn't even controversial. You're a non-American that likes to have sex with animals. Your inarticulateness is not my fault. If you're trying to say something else, perhaps you should say it in a language you actually understand.
For one who presumably do not want to have sex with animals your are talking too much about having sex with animals. ;-)
Is it freidian spilling of the bean... or just dull repetitivness that mind of an idiot so eager to reproduce. :-)))))))
The same with your inferiority complex -- where you trying to reassure yourself (forst of all) that you are True American. :-)))))))))))) Are you from some minority? Ethnic? Racial? Sexual? :-))))))))))))
You've used up the extent of your limited knowledge of English constantly talking about how you like to molest skunks. Your English instructors have been very cruel to you. This is why I suggested you post in a language you actually understand.
Perhaps you are unaware that Marx made the same stupid argument you are making about labor being the only cost of production. You deny you are defending Marx, yet proceed to argue as Marx did. Ricardo's labor theory of value was thoroughly debunked well before Marx plagiarized it. Only Marxists cling to that relic of imbecility.
But then again, you already admitted to being an imbecile, so no surprises there.
I am a minority only in the sense that pathetic non-Americans outnumber Americans.
Tell us more about yourself. We know by your admission that you are an imbecile, we know by your dismal knowledge of English that you're someone from a non-American shithole, and we know you like to tell us about how you enjoy fondling animals.
I would guess you are European, and your inability to communicate coherently places you somewhere east of Germany and perhaps north of Greece, somewhere with an education system contaminated by Communism for the majority of the last 100 years. Someone of Slavic extraction, correct? East of the Danube River for sure. The extreme stupidity is a dead giveaway.
\\You've used up the extent of your limited knowledge of English constantly talking about how you like to molest skunks.
(facepalm)
Do you even understand what you are saying??? :-))))))))))
There is ONLY TWO possibilities:
1) You trying to make that obviously forced joke. Forced, because it is so blatantly countre-factual. Because there ONLY ONE "skunk" I "molesting" here -- and that is you, my little funny pet-skunk Nigero. ;-P
OR
2) You really are that dumb, that you REALLY do understand it that way as you say it. Then, you are *clinical* *idiot*. Cretin. Without any redeeming excuses available. So much about your raving about someone not understanding mere English words. :-)))))))))))
You are neglecting a third possibility, and likely the possibility that is correct: Despite your admission that you are an imbecile, you for some reason don't believe you have persuaded me to accept that you are an imbecile, thus you keep trying to convince me you are an imbecile. That you want to dehumanize me as a "skunk" is just the pathetic ad hominem fallacy of a child's mind, that you feel sexually drawn to animals is only made more disturbing by your imbecilic need to mislabel me as an animal. Same with your misspelled racial epithets.
I don't know why you don't believe me. You admitted that you are an imbecile, and continuously demonstrate that you are an imbecile, I have no reason whatsoever to believe you are not an imbecile. Your admission of imbecility is practically the only thing you have been honest about.
I would be lying if I claimed to not understand why a pathetic non-American imbecile like yourself wants to continue getting trashed by me. This trait of yours to attack me even when we're in agreement that you are an imbecile is par for the course. I attack Marx, suddenly you become an ardent defender of Marx.
The amount of control over you that you have surrendered to me is hysterical, you imbecilic animal fucker. It isn't surprising, at all, that your nation and culture was effortlessly dominated by Russians, a people that give Pakistanis a run for their money on collective stupidity. I rule you without even invading you lol.
\\Perhaps you are unaware that Marx made the same stupid argument you are making about labor being the only cost of production.
Again. Show me costs that NOT based on some human did some work. That, should be easy, if you are right. But... you will not, because as ever -- your claims is countre-factual. Not based on Reality, just delusions of your deficient mind which full of words meaning of which you do not know. :-))))))))
\\You deny you are defending Marx, yet proceed to argue as Marx did. Ricardo's labor theory of value was thoroughly debunked...
And I do not "defend" that "labor theory of value". Because modern economy showed it enough, that there is NO value... only prices. Which based on subjective "valuation" of... anything.
\\I am a minority only in the sense that pathetic non-Americans outnumber Americans.
I guess my post went to Joe's spam. It will probably show up later.
Show me costs that NOT based on some human did some work.
Bottled water supplies in an area stricken by a natural disaster. Price of already produced goods skyrockets because supplies are suddenly limited. No human labor whatsoever involved.
That's the thing, Marx built an entire economic philosophy around Ricardo's labor theory of value, and Ricardo's labor theory of value had already been debunked by the time Marx started writing.
Even if Ricardo's LTV hadn't already been debunked before Marx ran with it, Marx could have debunked it himself by pointing out the circular reasoning and tautology of confusing labor costs with production costs. As a drunk idiot he had several bottles of refutation at his side at all times... The fermentation process of his brandy involved no human labor lol
Now I see your limitations more clearly. You do not understand why it wrong. And do not understand why it should be wrong. But because they taught you in your Hog-wards that it is wrong, you devised that half-baked/half-smelly-shit explanaition "that's must be because Marx was nasty person, and nasty ones cannot be right", isn't it? Magical thinking.
\\The fermentation process of his brandy involved no human labor lol
Because... it appears ONLY when product becomes selling goods. ;-) While you brewing moonshine for your own consumption -- that is between you two. But, the moment you'd try to sell it... questions of labour involved, and comparative advantage(s), and relative prices start glaring nastily at you. ;-P
What Is Comparative Advantage? - Investopedia www.investopedia.com › terms › comparativea... Comparative advantage is an economy's ability to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners.
\\The only magical thinking here is your belief that your feeble attempts to insult me are a substitute for intellect.
Your idiocy insults you, not me. That is insulting to demonstrate such an idiocy, while having such a big brain. Or no? Your mind deficiency can be explained with bad genes... from your ancestors boinking with skunks? ;-P With sad result of having miniscule brains in their progeny.
But well, that you able to thread words into sentences still... might I call your genius than? Genius skunk Nigero. It sound proudfool. ;-P
\\Your pitiful nature saddens me. Have you ever considered improving yourself by becoming an American?
So you will loose last chance to pretend that you are anyhow higher, standing on more winning position than me? Naah. :=P
Well, at least you're trying to improve yourself by learning English. You could go to Germany and try to sell the idea that you're actually better than an American and that other people are rodents and vermin, but they've worked quite hard at becoming more precise since the Nazis went extinct. They still haven't thanked us for obliterating Dresden, but if no one was rude there would be no measure of gratitude.
Maybe you're a tour guide for English-speaking people that pass though your nation on the way to somewhere important?
That is YOUR game. You started all that across fence shit-throwing. And now you trying to whine that it is unbearable. :-))))) "Those who will come to us with swords, will die from our swords".
I give you this chance to end this game. Without punishment even. But I am sure you will throw aside this chance. ;-P And will continue to play a role of lame and funny my little pet-slinky Nigero.
Give up on what, exactly? I already have your confession that you are an imbecile. It's not like you were hiding the fact that you're an imbecile, or even that you could, but I asked you to admit you are an imbecile and you were at least honest enough to confirm the obvious. You've put a lot of effort into convincing me you are an imbecile. I am not going to let your efforts in that regard go to waste.
I have already told you that your main flaw is that you think a discussion is a game to play with a winner and a loser. Perhaps this is a belief instilled into you by the inferior and primitive imbecilic culture of your non-American shithole of origin, but it's just wrong. You're not the first non-American life failure on a Quixotic search for meaning in your existence. I am trying to be completely empathetic when I look at the non-Americaness that God or life or fate or whatever has cursed you with. I totally understand your motivations. Were I born a non-American trying to improve the world, suicide would have been my first choice. So it would seem to me, at least from my innately superior American point of view, that the fact that you haven't committed suicide suggests you are in fact not interested in improving the world. Perhaps anti-depressants will help you cope better that continuously seeking conflict on the internet and finding yourself losing at both solitaire and masturbation. Please don't mistake this for compassion, but surely there's better escape mechanisms for your fragile ego than immersing yourself in constant reminders of your inferiority.
There is no game here, certainly not a game you can win. I do not respect imbeciles, and you have no power to change that.
\\Anonymous (((TC))) said... Give up on what, exactly? I already have your confession that you are an imbecile.
And what did I say? You are boringly predictable. As all idiots.
\\I have already told you that your main flaw is that you think a discussion is a game to play with a winner and a loser.
No. I do not. (yawn) That is srawmaning. And not very clever. But yeah, who can await anything clever from an idiot. That is how YOU do behave. Your idiotic idea, that one who repeat calling opponent "idiot-moron-imbecile-genius" more times, will look like one who brendish "winning argument". :-))))
\\Perhaps this is a belief instilled into you by the inferior and primitive imbecilic culture of your non-American shithole of origin, but it's just wrong.
And you can prove that claim? :-)))))))))))))) But yeah, what I am talking about -- idiots ARE oblivious to what word "proof" means. Well, as any other clever word. Apart from simple ones. Dog. Dog. Dog. Bark. Bark. Bark.
\\suicide would have been my first choice.
And how often thoughts about suicide visit your mind, parient?
\\Perhaps anti-depressants will help you cope better that continuously seeking conflict on the internet and finding yourself losing at both solitaire and masturbation. Please don't mistake this for compassion, but surely there's better escape mechanisms for your fragile ego than immersing yourself in constant reminders of your inferiority.
Freufian spilling of the bean all way down. (yawn) :-))) But I am not psychiatrists to you. Go seek for a qualified help. What? Got no money? Proud and superior American.
Life is a chemical System that uses energy to keep itself from reaching chemical equilibrium. Equilibrium is the situation in which chemicals no longer have a tendency to react over time.
In Western Cristianity to became one you'd need to allow em to crucify you, isn't it? Or any other uneasy way of leaving this mundane world. Not very promicing.
What game? Aside from Q's repeated declarations that he enjoys having sex with animals and trying to be insulting with words and racial epithets he can't even spell correctly, I commend his honesty in admitting that he's an imbecile. This is huge, FJ! You've known me for a good 18 years or so (my how time flies!) and never once has a blithering imbecile like Q responded positively to my demand for intellectual honesty in admitting to said imbecility, yet Q here in fact did just that. Sure, his joy in trying to tell people in broken English that he likes to have sex with animals and trying to be racist with misspelled words all the time is somewhat disturbing, but if you keep in mind that Q is a blithering imbecile, you can just acknowledge all the distracting forays into Q's bestiality fetish and obsession with racial bigotry is just the blither in the blithering part of his imbecility, it really isn't bothersome. Q will continue visit your blogs and try to toss out some garbled, misspelled insults at me or any of his betters, and we'll just laugh and remind him that he's still a self-confessed imbecile.
We do have to be patient. Q understands that he is an imbecile, and this introspective self-awareness on his part has motivated him to seek self-improvement by learning English to the best of his meager and primitive abilities. We have to give him some credit, perhaps a participation trophy. It's like Russia's "special military operation" in Ukraine if you take away objective standards of success in military endeavors and instead view it the same way you would the "special Olympics" where a retard flailing down the track will slip and fall in the drool of their fellow retards all the way to the finish line and go out for ice cream later. Q is "special," and we have to make accomodations for the fact that he may be able to tell us which window in his classroom tastes the best if we quiz him later.
One of the ironies of America inventing the internet and making it available even to the rock-stacking natives of Q's shithole is that exposing more of the world to superior American culture was supposed to elevate these dirt-eating hairless monkeys to something more akin to civilization. A particularly non-Hobbesian dream of self-improving parasites, but at least we're reaching the animal-raping racist grassroots of the non-American cultures now, and we don't even have to do it in whatever garbage language they actually speak.
Continue-continue, my little bonker skunk Nigero. You doing nothing but pleasing me with that little funny treaks of self-revealing yourself, through leaking your own pss-pss. What a funny fellow. :-)))))))))))
\\we're reaching the animal-raping racist grassroots of the non-American cultures now
You are not Native American, still... so, isn't it about your own grass-roots? :-)))))))))
I need a Marlon Perkins' Wild Kingdom narration for these fortuitous appearances of Q.
"Fresh from a breakfast of dill seed, sour cream, vodka, and animal droppings, the Russian emerges from its hole to declare its imbecility with racial epithets and warbling song as it seeks to mate with another coprophagic rodent..."
Mutual of Omaha would probably yank the funding though.
"Fresh from a breakfast of dill seed, sour cream, vodka, and animal droppings, the Russian emerges from its hole to declare its imbecility with racial epithets and warbling song as it seeks to mate with another coprophagic rodent..."
Even though you tryed to smear me with it... (I'll admit it here, to make you excited, to make you think that you succeed) I cannot agree more, here, that Russians is that nasty beasts. Well, most surely -- they are in your ancestry too. ;-P From where'd you have this vivid picture of ordinary Russian life... if not from your ancestral genetic memory? As you are not True American. Not Native American. And chimerism... that is distinctive trait of a nature of Russian. As well as low-brow badmouthing, inability to grasp meaning of words, idiocy (you know, Dostoevsky? ;-P), inability to learn more than one lang. Et cetera. Et cetera. Et cetera.
"Watch closely now as Jim pokes the docile Russian with a stick to have it proclaim it is better than a Russian now that it is learning English. The entirely predictable autonomic motor responses of the agitated Russian soon have it thirsting for more of Jim's dill-flavored vodka as our trusty assistant has coaxed the creature to insist it will no longer degrade itself for the entertainment of its betters, that Russian culture should be allowed to expand beyond its zoo exhibit to find where the dill-flavored vodka is made so they may Lysenko-ize it into water for their mud huts."
Ha-ha-ha... you exposed yourself. You know even about Lysenko. :-)))))))) What generation of Russians on the American soil you are? Not first, it seems. Second. Third? No, don't say, I'll try to devise it from your further words and behavior.
Lightbulb just appeared above my head... and who said that you are really American. You prefectly can be Russian Troll, working labourously to imposter oneself as one. :-))))))))))))))))))))
Say, whose Crimiea? ;-P If you'd try top flaunt that question -- we'll know for sure.
A nation that fights like that doesn't deserve to exist. Upgrade the ATACMS missile systems we're giving Ukraine and let them she'll Moscow around the clock.
Or... they forgot to tell you. 'Cause they was ashamed of it themself. So, they just transmitted to yiu this feeling of utter shame... you cannot find reason of. And genes of idiocy. ;-P Oh, and that realities of Russian World that come to you in your dream: like drinking vodka and shitting on the streets... from backside, or frontside. That are somehow so enticing, but same time as you was taught that doing it is wrong... that's why you cannot help it, for it to slip off your tongue.
You're putting up so much flak to indicate my target has been destroyed.
It's hilarious to me that the only delusional imbecilic animal-raping Russian here is crying foul. I've identified the Russian, I've gone too far lol
Now your task is to outline if you're an animal-raping imbecile because you're Russian or in spite of being Russian, a distinction I don't give a fuck about.
Contre-factual, again. (yawn) If that is so much fun to you... WHY you constantly running away, Nigero? ;=)
\\...animal-raping imbecile...
After we found this your self-identification... there lot's of things we can extract off you more... or not?
Well, you didn't answered to "Whose Crimea?". That way you self-identified yourself to be from Russian Progojon's troll farm... now that makes it exciting. Given that you are gene-chimeric skunk and perrot. What ELSE genes was added to that mix? Was there at least something human in that Dr.Moro's experiments? ;-P
As someone at least self-aware enough to freely admit to their imbecility, you theoretically should be able to strain yourself to figure out why I don't answer imbecilic questions given your advance notice that I do not want to be in a discussion with an imbecile.
It is not my fault, nor is it my concern that you are unable to reconcile reality with your imbecility.
So, you decided to double-down on flauntin. JUST THE SAME as any first Prigojin's troll would do. Now you totally busted. ;-P Another way. What problem would pose to you to answer simple question -- Whose Crimea?
Well, about you "don't wanting being in a discussion" -- lame bragging. You are not "not wanting", you are bona fide incapable. :-))) And now we reveal more and more reasons behind it. And that is damn interesting. So, continue-continue.
Reality? Reality is that -- that you mentally degraded who-knw-what :-))))) So, there is only ONE thing you can say about Reality -- it's to demonstrate subtle traits of your idiotic mind, with your bechavior.
What Is Dementia? - CDC www.cdc.gov › aging › dementia Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing ...
Go check closest neurologists ASAP. Maybe that is not too late and there is some new miraculous drug that can keep your mind from degradation.
That is my sincere and kind suggestion to you. No bullshit talks. No smearing. We all mortal. We all age.
BUT.
That sincerity and humanism will be ignored in a jiffy. So. You can continue going to your shaman who will continue to say to you that his mixture from poisonous mashrooms is that miraculous drug that can make you "sound intelligent" and most important feel yourself inteligent and all that folks from CDC are worthless shamans. :-)))))))))))))
78 comments:
We need to admit Ukraine as the 51st state.
What about Mexico?
And Zelensky as POTUS? ;-P
Well, there was that funny hollywood flicl where Shwartz became one... after law was changed in his regard. ;-P
Mexico too, but Ukraine first. Nothing in the US Constitution gives Russia the right to take our dick out of their throat.
:P
Well.
There is one question which bothers me for a long time -- why Ams do call their USA... an empire? That is preposterous. And rediculous. From the standpoint of real ones. And from historical perspective.
Is there something it based on? Apart from unadvised wishful thinking?
Look at the map.
We hold every country colored "red" hostage. Cross us, and then see what happens. Not a single country in the world will trade with you.
This is the ancient Greek way. Place military forces in an unassailable citadel/ fortress within the city to ensure you allies remain loyal.
The Roman way was to take the children of their allies "hostage" and raise them in Rome. Welcome to the American University system.
\\We hold every country colored "red" hostage.
But... that is not what Empires do.
Great Rome controlling trade?
Ottomans collecting mere sea-crossing fee.
Not surprising that True Empores, even though long long as declined, seeing you as counterfacte.
\\This is the ancient Greek way.
Was Greace an empire? Ever?
\\The Roman way was to take the children of their allies "hostage" and raise them in Rome. Welcome to the American University system.
Yeah. But not only that.
They was taking em as soldiers. And payed with citizenship.
France -- doing it. You -- not.
France -- empire, well kinda, was. You -- not.
And well. That is not YOUR system. British one.
Let he who hath understanding...
\\We hold every country colored "red" hostage.
But... that is not what Empires do.
Great Rome controlling trade?
Ottomans collecting mere sea-crossing fee.
Not surprising that True Empores, even though long long as declined, seeing you as counterfacte.
So there are no "business" empires?
\\This is the ancient Greek way.
Was Greace an empire? Ever?
No, but little "parts" of it, like Macedon, were. You've heard of Alexander the Great? That was the result of Xenophon's "Anabasis" and an "Athenian" tutor (Aristotle).
\\The Roman way was to take the children of their allies "hostage" and raise them in Rome. Welcome to the American University system.
Yeah. But not only that.
They was taking em as soldiers. And payed with citizenship.
Yes, we have ways of allowing foreigners to "earn" citizenship.
France -- doing it. You -- not.
France -- empire, well kinda, was. You -- not.
And well. That is not YOUR system. British one.
Yes, we're doing it more "cleverly". We do it with business. That way the slaves hug their chains. Even the Russian oligarch's are "dying to business" with the West.
The "capitalist discourse" IS the new/ UNIVERSAL "Master Discourse".
What happened to Meden agan?
Let he who hath understanding...
...observe the vanishing mediator.
Was Marx wrong?
"It is concentration of capitals already formed, destruction of their individual independence, expropriation of capitalist by capitalist, transformation of many small into few large capitals.... Capital grows in one place to a huge mass in a single hand, because it has in another place been lost by many.... The battle of competition is fought by cheapening of commodities. The cheapness of commodities demands, ceteris paribus, on the productiveness of labour, and this again on the scale of production. Therefore, the larger capitals beat the smaller. It will further be remembered that, with the development of the capitalist mode of production, there is an increase in the minimum amount of individual capital necessary to carry on a business under its normal conditions. The smaller capitals, therefore, crowd into spheres of production which Modern Industry has only sporadically or incompletely got hold of. Here competition rages.... It always ends in the ruin of many small capitalists, whose capitals partly pass into the hands of their conquerors, partly vanish.
So I favor laws that limit the accumulation of capital. Bigger is the enemy of "big enough". It becomes "too big to fail".
E-r-r-r-r-r-p!
Rasputin's penis, Lenin's corpse, and now Potemkin's bones .. the Russian fetish with necromancy will never end...
\\So there are no "business" empires?
Google is better equiped to give you etimology of word "empire".
Or... maybe Nigero/TC could show his intellect... even if for this one time. ;-P
\\No, but little "parts" of it, like Macedon, were. You've heard of Alexander the Great? That was the result of Xenophon's "Anabasis" and an "Athenian" tutor (Aristotle).
Well... that is like Napoleon and France.
But well, what country he created as his heritage? Nortern Macedonia? :-)))
\\Yes, we have ways of allowing foreigners to "earn" citizenship.
Everybody have... that ways.
But only true empires have ways of empires. ;-)
\\Yes, we're doing it more "cleverly". We do it with business. That way the slaves hug their chains. Even the Russian oligarch's are "dying to business" with the West.
Or... you like to think that way... ;-)
Well, again, that is what everybody doing.
Every country. No matter how little. Even separate region/county in it. Separate town/village.
Have own ideas and things they think they excel in. ;-)
\\The "capitalist discourse" IS the new/ UNIVERSAL "Master Discourse".
:-))))
Go say it to Putin. Xi?
Even Un looking at your condescendedly. ;-P
\\Was Marx wrong?
Are you serious?
\\So I favor laws that limit the accumulation of capital. Bigger is the enemy of "big enough". It becomes "too big to fail".
That is motto of Socialists. ;-P
Are you really on that Dark path downhill?
Nigero. That is really your level of undestanding. ;-P
Was Marx wrong?
I think his "ceteris paribus" caveat in that passage pretty much negates the point he was trying to make. Marx, much like our retarded acolyte Q here, requires his opinions to be based on "a certain point of view" rather than just based in reality like everybody else. The "ceteris paribus" there is telling us to ignore observable phenomena that make Marx's premise false. "All other things being the same and unchanged" describes absolutely nothing in the universe, much less economics and market forces.
So there are no "business" empires?
None that command a military ;)
The Economic Calculation Problem is a hurdle Marxism will never overcome.
\\Anonymous (((TC))) said...
The Economic Calculation Problem is a hurdle Marxism will never overcome.
rofl :-)))))
Like they ever tryed or wanted to try. :-)))))))))))))))))
That all is idea of Control. Of hogging ALL power to themself.
Economical problems??? Oh, come on. Who cares.
Why you do not undertand that... while that is so close to your modus operadndi.
Oh, yes, because you are idiot. :-))))) I forgot.
\\much like our retarded acolyte Q here, requires his opinions to be based on "a certain point of view" rather than just based in reality like everybody else.
Oh yeah, you cannot allow even slightest chance to demonstrate what a hopeless idiot you are to slip out of your... pseudopodias, isn't it, Nigero? :-)))))
Ability to reconsile situation from different POV is must have... to anything that want to claim having a baige "sapienti est". ;-P
And. Even that ancient beardy greeks knew that there is NO posibility to percieve reality directly. Everybody doing it through distorted glasses of their prejudges and biases, their language obscurity, deficiency of their mind. ;-P
Do you know about daltonics?
That is... you have daltonism of mind. ;-P Poor thing. Dog that cannot see a rainbow.
\\The "ceteris paribus" there is telling us to ignore observable phenomena that make Marx's premise false.
Go say it, genius.
"The battle of competition is fought by cheapening of commodities. The cheapness of commodities demands, ceteris paribus, on the productiveness of labour, and this again on the scale of production."
How you can make products cheaper (in a long run) WITHOUT productivness of labour rised???
\\ "All other things being the same and unchanged" describes absolutely nothing in the universe, much less economics and market forces.
Yep. Zero understanding of meaning. And only playing with "true meaning of words". (yawn)
What is your background?
Lawyer?
Librarian?
Herbalist? :-))))
I dunno, where such rigidity and narrowness of mind could be benefitional, for which profession?
Ah, I know, university professor in some obscure and unappreceated field. Like English literature. ;-P
You seem to keep forgetting that you are an imbecile, Q. Your failures to understand English wouldn't be so delightfully comical if you didn't wheeze so much about your illiteracy being other people's fault.
How you can make products cheaper (in a long run) WITHOUT productivness of labour rised???
Do you mind posting this question in a language that you actually understand? Or do you make grammatical and spelling errors in your primitive tribe's squawking also?
The way you phrased your question appears to be a defense of Marx, so I'm asking for clarification to see which flavor of stupid you're serving today.
Needless to say, Marx himself never made anything but bastard kids and vomit stains on broken furniture, so I'm a little skeptical about the "value" of his "labor" in an economics discussion.
\\You seem to keep forgetting that you are an imbecile, Q.
Best wishes to you too. My little pet-skunky. Your morning (or that is evening, midday, midnight?) pss-pss odors of idioticus anonimous as always do smell distinctively.
\\Your failures to understand English wouldn't be so delightfully comical if you didn't wheeze so much about your illiteracy being other people's fault.
Ya mamma was wise, teaching you that wisdom of idiots: "To conceal that you are idiot, when people revealing that you are fool the best tactic is to scream 'no, you are fool' at them and run away". :-))))))))))))))))))
\\Do you mind posting this question in a language that you actually understand?
You yourself claimed that you DO NOT understand any other language. Apart from English.
But English words in not that obvious and apparent to your deficient mind order makes you flabbergasted too.
Go figure, what language you actually understand.
Oh, I know. Only simple words. Only short sentences.
Look child. This is a dog. Dog saying -- bark-bark-bark. What saying a dog? Good girl.
\\ Or do you make grammatical and spelling errors in your primitive tribe's squawking also?
You mean mistypings? All of the time.
But. Unlike in your cranky lang, brittlness of which poses such an enormous problem for a mind-deficient people like you, there is error-correction built-in. ;-P
\\The way you phrased your question appears to be a defense of Marx,
Yeah. Strawmaning all way down. :-))))
Marx do not need my defence. He was product of his time. And his errors stem of that fact.
That that all kinds of mind-deficient fellows to whom it was impossible to grike him and correct his errs -- how he can be responsible for that?
\\ so I'm asking for clarification to see which flavor of stupid you're serving today.
O.K.
Read by my lips. :-)))
Is there other way?
To make products cheaper.
Without rising productivity of laibour.
\\Needless to say, Marx himself never made anything but bastard kids and vomit stains on broken furniture, so I'm a little skeptical about the "value" of his "labor" in an economics discussion.
:-)))))))))))))))))
Humor of idiots.
Please, continue.
I collecting such things.
I asked for you to switch to a language you actually understand, assuming you could spell and use correct grammar in that language enough for Google to translate it to English. I'm really not interested in reading you struggle with proclaiming how much you like to have sex with animals in English. It was a chance for you to demonstrate intellectual honesty, the same intellectual honesty you demonstrated when you admitted that you actually are an imbecile.
I understand you don't want to reveal what language or nation you are from. I would also feel embarrassed if I were from a non-American shithole like you are. But please understand this is unavoidable, it doesn't really matter which non-American shithole you are from, it is still going to be inferior to America and Americans. There is no argument here, we both know you're from an inferior non-American culture that likes to have sex with animals. You've insisted upon that fact and belabored that point so much that it isn't even controversial. You're a non-American that likes to have sex with animals. Your inarticulateness is not my fault. If you're trying to say something else, perhaps you should say it in a language you actually understand.
In as much as you might have something to talk about other than your love of having sex with animals, I am hopeful you can communicate effectively in the language of the inferior and pathetic culture you are actually from, and know more words, enough to expand your capacity for dialogue with your betters. I am optimistic that you will eventually realize animals don't speak English and will seek consensual bestiality elsewhere.
Until then, between your repetitive declarations that you like to sexually molest animals, all I'm getting from you is a defense of Marx's idea that the costs of products are decreased by an increase in labor productivity. Perhaps like Marx, you've never run or even worked in a factory so you have no idea what you're talking about. Needless to say, labor is not the only cost to production, nor is it the primary determinate of the price of a produced good. Marx refutes himself with his "ceteris paribus" caveat... Marx is correct if we ignore all the things he asks us to ignore that make his declaration wrong. Reducing his nonsense to an indefensible tautology. Marx is wrong because actual factories can not ignore the things his "ceteris paribus" ignores...energy costs, material costs, logistical and distribution costs, marketing costs, regulatory costs, and so on. It is exactly as if Marx didn't know what he was talking about once he was done fantasizing about killing bosses and property owners. Stupid can not be made not-stupid. Marx wanted to ignore what he couldn't understand, that's all. You wouldn't run a factory with Marxism any more than you would plan a budget without knowledge of math.
Blah-blah-blah :-)))))))))))
Yeah. You are wordy idiot. I get it. (yawn)
\\Needless to say, labor is not the only cost to production
No. It is ONLY.
Costs of ANY product defined by labour.
Even if it ore -- that is cost of digging it out.
Even if it some freebie found on the sea shore -- that is cost of delivering it to a market.
Yet again, you demonstrated that you are nothing more than Know Nothing Wordy Idiot, Nigero.
\\Marx is wrong because actual factories can not ignore the things his "ceteris paribus" ignores...energy costs, material costs, logistical and distribution costs, marketing costs, regulatory costs, and so on.
And how increase of effectivness CAN increase this other costs??? :-)))))
\\Stupid can not be made not-stupid.
Yep. Once in a while you can spout something that is undeniably true.
But well, that is accident. Like with that monkeys typing British Encyclopedia. :-)))
You still unable to understand -- that there is things that you do not understand. At all.
To find knowledge, one need to admit adsence of knowledge first. ;-)
But that simple truth mind of an idiots inclined to avoid at all cost.
\\I understand you don't want to reveal what language or nation you are from. I would also feel embarrassed if I were from a non-American shithole like you are. But please understand this is unavoidable, it doesn't really matter which non-American shithole you are from, it is still going to be inferior to America and Americans. There is no argument here, we both know you're from an inferior non-American culture that likes to have sex with animals. You've insisted upon that fact and belabored that point so much that it isn't even controversial. You're a non-American that likes to have sex with animals. Your inarticulateness is not my fault. If you're trying to say something else, perhaps you should say it in a language you actually understand.
For one who presumably do not want to have sex with animals your are talking too much about having sex with animals. ;-)
Is it freidian spilling of the bean... or just dull repetitivness that mind of an idiot so eager to reproduce. :-)))))))
The same with your inferiority complex -- where you trying to reassure yourself (forst of all) that you are True American. :-))))))))))))
Are you from some minority? Ethnic? Racial? Sexual? :-))))))))))))
You've used up the extent of your limited knowledge of English constantly talking about how you like to molest skunks. Your English instructors have been very cruel to you. This is why I suggested you post in a language you actually understand.
Perhaps you are unaware that Marx made the same stupid argument you are making about labor being the only cost of production. You deny you are defending Marx, yet proceed to argue as Marx did. Ricardo's labor theory of value was thoroughly debunked well before Marx plagiarized it. Only Marxists cling to that relic of imbecility.
But then again, you already admitted to being an imbecile, so no surprises there.
I am a minority only in the sense that pathetic non-Americans outnumber Americans.
Tell us more about yourself. We know by your admission that you are an imbecile, we know by your dismal knowledge of English that you're someone from a non-American shithole, and we know you like to tell us about how you enjoy fondling animals.
I would guess you are European, and your inability to communicate coherently places you somewhere east of Germany and perhaps north of Greece, somewhere with an education system contaminated by Communism for the majority of the last 100 years. Someone of Slavic extraction, correct? East of the Danube River for sure. The extreme stupidity is a dead giveaway.
\\You've used up the extent of your limited knowledge of English constantly talking about how you like to molest skunks.
(facepalm)
Do you even understand what you are saying??? :-))))))))))
There is ONLY TWO possibilities:
1) You trying to make that obviously forced joke. Forced, because it is so blatantly countre-factual. Because there ONLY ONE "skunk" I "molesting" here -- and that is you, my little funny pet-skunk Nigero. ;-P
OR
2) You really are that dumb, that you REALLY do understand it that way as you say it.
Then, you are *clinical* *idiot*. Cretin. Without any redeeming excuses available. So much about your raving about someone not understanding mere English words. :-)))))))))))
You are neglecting a third possibility, and likely the possibility that is correct: Despite your admission that you are an imbecile, you for some reason don't believe you have persuaded me to accept that you are an imbecile, thus you keep trying to convince me you are an imbecile. That you want to dehumanize me as a "skunk" is just the pathetic ad hominem fallacy of a child's mind, that you feel sexually drawn to animals is only made more disturbing by your imbecilic need to mislabel me as an animal. Same with your misspelled racial epithets.
I don't know why you don't believe me. You admitted that you are an imbecile, and continuously demonstrate that you are an imbecile, I have no reason whatsoever to believe you are not an imbecile. Your admission of imbecility is practically the only thing you have been honest about.
I would be lying if I claimed to not understand why a pathetic non-American imbecile like yourself wants to continue getting trashed by me. This trait of yours to attack me even when we're in agreement that you are an imbecile is par for the course. I attack Marx, suddenly you become an ardent defender of Marx.
The amount of control over you that you have surrendered to me is hysterical, you imbecilic animal fucker. It isn't surprising, at all, that your nation and culture was effortlessly dominated by Russians, a people that give Pakistanis a run for their money on collective stupidity. I rule you without even invading you lol.
Remember, you chose to lose. Loser.
\\Perhaps you are unaware that Marx made the same stupid argument you are making about labor being the only cost of production.
Again.
Show me costs that NOT based on some human did some work.
That, should be easy, if you are right.
But... you will not, because as ever -- your claims is countre-factual.
Not based on Reality, just delusions of your deficient mind which full of words meaning of which you do not know. :-))))))))
\\You deny you are defending Marx, yet proceed to argue as Marx did. Ricardo's labor theory of value was thoroughly debunked...
And I do not "defend" that "labor theory of value".
Because modern economy showed it enough, that there is NO value... only prices.
Which based on subjective "valuation" of... anything.
\\I am a minority only in the sense that pathetic non-Americans outnumber Americans.
:-)))))))))))))))))
I guess my post went to Joe's spam. It will probably show up later.
Show me costs that NOT based on some human did some work.
Bottled water supplies in an area stricken by a natural disaster. Price of already produced goods skyrockets because supplies are suddenly limited. No human labor whatsoever involved.
Price of selling IS NOT THE SAME as costs of production.
And that is exactly Marxian delusion, and 19th century natural phylosophy approach... that they must relate, somehow.
That's the thing, Marx built an entire economic philosophy around Ricardo's labor theory of value, and Ricardo's labor theory of value had already been debunked by the time Marx started writing.
Stupid makes stupid
Well. We all tend to be stupid... in a hindsight.
That is not stupidity itself that is a problem... but stubborness in it.
But, whom I saying it to. Yeah. :-)))
Even if Ricardo's LTV hadn't already been debunked before Marx ran with it, Marx could have debunked it himself by pointing out the circular reasoning and tautology of confusing labor costs with production costs. As a drunk idiot he had several bottles of refutation at his side at all times... The fermentation process of his brandy involved no human labor lol
Now I see your limitations more clearly.
You do not understand why it wrong. And do not understand why it should be wrong.
But because they taught you in your Hog-wards that it is wrong, you devised that half-baked/half-smelly-shit explanaition "that's must be because Marx was nasty person, and nasty ones cannot be right", isn't it?
Magical thinking.
\\The fermentation process of his brandy involved no human labor lol
Because... it appears ONLY when product becomes selling goods. ;-)
While you brewing moonshine for your own consumption -- that is between you two.
But, the moment you'd try to sell it... questions of labour involved, and comparative advantage(s), and relative prices start glaring nastily at you. ;-P
What Is Comparative Advantage? - Investopedia
www.investopedia.com › terms › comparativea...
Comparative advantage is an economy's ability to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners.
The only magical thinking here is your belief that your feeble attempts to insult me are a substitute for intellect.
Your pitiful nature saddens me. Have you ever considered improving yourself by becoming an American?
\\The only magical thinking here is your belief that your feeble attempts to insult me are a substitute for intellect.
Your idiocy insults you, not me. That is insulting to demonstrate such an idiocy, while having such a big brain. Or no? Your mind deficiency can be explained with bad genes... from your ancestors boinking with skunks? ;-P With sad result of having miniscule brains in their progeny.
But well, that you able to thread words into sentences still...
might I call your genius than? Genius skunk Nigero. It sound proudfool. ;-P
\\Your pitiful nature saddens me. Have you ever considered improving yourself by becoming an American?
So you will loose last chance to pretend that you are anyhow higher, standing on more winning position than me? Naah. :=P
Well, at least you're trying to improve yourself by learning English. You could go to Germany and try to sell the idea that you're actually better than an American and that other people are rodents and vermin, but they've worked quite hard at becoming more precise since the Nazis went extinct. They still haven't thanked us for obliterating Dresden, but if no one was rude there would be no measure of gratitude.
Maybe you're a tour guide for English-speaking people that pass though your nation on the way to somewhere important?
Giving up, already? :-))))))))
That is YOUR game. You started all that across fence shit-throwing.
And now you trying to whine that it is unbearable. :-)))))
"Those who will come to us with swords, will die from our swords".
I give you this chance to end this game. Without punishment even.
But I am sure you will throw aside this chance. ;-P
And will continue to play a role of lame and funny my little pet-slinky Nigero.
Give up on what, exactly? I already have your confession that you are an imbecile. It's not like you were hiding the fact that you're an imbecile, or even that you could, but I asked you to admit you are an imbecile and you were at least honest enough to confirm the obvious. You've put a lot of effort into convincing me you are an imbecile. I am not going to let your efforts in that regard go to waste.
I have already told you that your main flaw is that you think a discussion is a game to play with a winner and a loser. Perhaps this is a belief instilled into you by the inferior and primitive imbecilic culture of your non-American shithole of origin, but it's just wrong. You're not the first non-American life failure on a Quixotic search for meaning in your existence. I am trying to be completely empathetic when I look at the non-Americaness that God or life or fate or whatever has cursed you with. I totally understand your motivations. Were I born a non-American trying to improve the world, suicide would have been my first choice. So it would seem to me, at least from my innately superior American point of view, that the fact that you haven't committed suicide suggests you are in fact not interested in improving the world. Perhaps anti-depressants will help you cope better that continuously seeking conflict on the internet and finding yourself losing at both solitaire and masturbation. Please don't mistake this for compassion, but surely there's better escape mechanisms for your fragile ego than immersing yourself in constant reminders of your inferiority.
There is no game here, certainly not a game you can win. I do not respect imbeciles, and you have no power to change that.
\\Anonymous (((TC))) said...
Give up on what, exactly? I already have your confession that you are an imbecile.
And what did I say? You are boringly predictable. As all idiots.
\\I have already told you that your main flaw is that you think a discussion is a game to play with a winner and a loser.
No. I do not. (yawn)
That is srawmaning. And not very clever. But yeah, who can await anything clever from an idiot.
That is how YOU do behave.
Your idiotic idea, that one who repeat calling opponent "idiot-moron-imbecile-genius" more times, will look like one who brendish "winning argument". :-))))
\\Perhaps this is a belief instilled into you by the inferior and primitive imbecilic culture of your non-American shithole of origin, but it's just wrong.
And you can prove that claim? :-))))))))))))))
But yeah, what I am talking about -- idiots ARE oblivious to what word "proof" means. Well, as any other clever word.
Apart from simple ones. Dog. Dog. Dog. Bark. Bark. Bark.
\\suicide would have been my first choice.
And how often thoughts about suicide visit your mind, parient?
\\Perhaps anti-depressants will help you cope better that continuously seeking conflict on the internet and finding yourself losing at both solitaire and masturbation. Please don't mistake this for compassion, but surely there's better escape mechanisms for your fragile ego than immersing yourself in constant reminders of your inferiority.
Freufian spilling of the bean all way down. (yawn) :-)))
But I am not psychiatrists to you. Go seek for a qualified help.
What? Got no money? Proud and superior American.
PS Continue-continue entertaining me, baka Nigero.
There is no game here, certainly not a game you can win. I do not respect imbeciles, and you have no power to change that.
Funny-funny pet-skunky Nigero.
Seeing a hoop, doing a jump. ;-P
Still not tired of this game, guys? Persistence is not existence, it's merely the symptom of a drive.
*shakes head*
...but then again, I could be mistaken in that.
Life is a chemical System that uses energy to keep itself from reaching chemical equilibrium. Equilibrium is the situation in which chemicals no longer have a tendency to react over time.
Generation from opposites.
Am I a sinner... for being curious? ;-P
Would you be a saint, were you not?
In Western Cristianity to became one you'd need to allow em to crucify you, isn't it?
Or any other uneasy way of leaving this mundane world.
Not very promicing.
How old was Mother Theresa when she passed?
Oh, yeah, forgot about that... new saints. :-)
"New" (post Euripides) tragedy... :(
Still not tired of this game, guys?
What game? Aside from Q's repeated declarations that he enjoys having sex with animals and trying to be insulting with words and racial epithets he can't even spell correctly, I commend his honesty in admitting that he's an imbecile. This is huge, FJ! You've known me for a good 18 years or so (my how time flies!) and never once has a blithering imbecile like Q responded positively to my demand for intellectual honesty in admitting to said imbecility, yet Q here in fact did just that. Sure, his joy in trying to tell people in broken English that he likes to have sex with animals and trying to be racist with misspelled words all the time is somewhat disturbing, but if you keep in mind that Q is a blithering imbecile, you can just acknowledge all the distracting forays into Q's bestiality fetish and obsession with racial bigotry is just the blither in the blithering part of his imbecility, it really isn't bothersome. Q will continue visit your blogs and try to toss out some garbled, misspelled insults at me or any of his betters, and we'll just laugh and remind him that he's still a self-confessed imbecile.
We do have to be patient. Q understands that he is an imbecile, and this introspective self-awareness on his part has motivated him to seek self-improvement by learning English to the best of his meager and primitive abilities. We have to give him some credit, perhaps a participation trophy. It's like Russia's "special military operation" in Ukraine if you take away objective standards of success in military endeavors and instead view it the same way you would the "special Olympics" where a retard flailing down the track will slip and fall in the drool of their fellow retards all the way to the finish line and go out for ice cream later. Q is "special," and we have to make accomodations for the fact that he may be able to tell us which window in his classroom tastes the best if we quiz him later.
One of the ironies of America inventing the internet and making it available even to the rock-stacking natives of Q's shithole is that exposing more of the world to superior American culture was supposed to elevate these dirt-eating hairless monkeys to something more akin to civilization. A particularly non-Hobbesian dream of self-improving parasites, but at least we're reaching the animal-raping racist grassroots of the non-American cultures now, and we don't even have to do it in whatever garbage language they actually speak.
Continue-continue, my little bonker skunk Nigero.
You doing nothing but pleasing me with that little funny treaks of self-revealing yourself, through leaking your own pss-pss. What a funny fellow. :-)))))))))))
\\we're reaching the animal-raping racist grassroots of the non-American cultures now
You are not Native American, still... so, isn't it about your own grass-roots? :-)))))))))
I need a Marlon Perkins' Wild Kingdom narration for these fortuitous appearances of Q.
"Fresh from a breakfast of dill seed, sour cream, vodka, and animal droppings, the Russian emerges from its hole to declare its imbecility with racial epithets and warbling song as it seeks to mate with another coprophagic rodent..."
Mutual of Omaha would probably yank the funding though.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Thing is. Your screeds, make me only laughing.
And vise versa.
My pointed revealations of your moronity -- sting you to no end, Nigero.
Even through your thick skin of mentally deficient gene-chimerist perrot, Nigero. ;-P
So, continue-continue, your silly treaks: jumping through hoops, leaking your own piss, rolling in your own feces... perroting.
So... what next coming out you'll commit? what else, even more strange facts about your family you'll reveal?
And.
"Fresh from a breakfast of dill seed, sour cream, vodka, and animal droppings, the Russian emerges from its hole to declare its imbecility with racial epithets and warbling song as it seeks to mate with another coprophagic rodent..."
Even though you tryed to smear me with it... (I'll admit it here, to make you excited, to make you think that you succeed)
I cannot agree more, here, that Russians is that nasty beasts.
Well, most surely -- they are in your ancestry too. ;-P From where'd you have this vivid picture of ordinary Russian life... if not from your ancestral genetic memory?
As you are not True American. Not Native American.
And chimerism... that is distinctive trait of a nature of Russian.
As well as low-brow badmouthing, inability to grasp meaning of words, idiocy (you know, Dostoevsky? ;-P), inability to learn more than one lang. Et cetera. Et cetera. Et cetera.
"Watch closely now as Jim pokes the docile Russian with a stick to have it proclaim it is better than a Russian now that it is learning English. The entirely predictable autonomic motor responses of the agitated Russian soon have it thirsting for more of Jim's dill-flavored vodka as our trusty assistant has coaxed the creature to insist it will no longer degrade itself for the entertainment of its betters, that Russian culture should be allowed to expand beyond its zoo exhibit to find where the dill-flavored vodka is made so they may Lysenko-ize it into water for their mud huts."
Ha-ha-ha... you exposed yourself. You know even about Lysenko. :-))))))))
What generation of Russians on the American soil you are?
Not first, it seems.
Second. Third? No, don't say, I'll try to devise it from your further words and behavior.
Lightbulb just appeared above my head... and who said that you are really American. You prefectly can be Russian Troll, working labourously to imposter oneself as one. :-))))))))))))))))))))
Say, whose Crimiea? ;-P If you'd try top flaunt that question -- we'll know for sure.
I assume lack of answer as try to flaunt it.
So, you are Prigojin's Troll, Nigero? Not surprising that your mental abilities is so severly lacking. ;-P
I have absolutely no Slavic ancestry, Russian or otherwise. If I did, perhaps I could understand how you sit down without choking yourself.
Russian Tactics... "Soviet" style.
A nation that fights like that doesn't deserve to exist. Upgrade the ATACMS missile systems we're giving Ukraine and let them she'll Moscow around the clock.
shell*
Or... they forgot to tell you. 'Cause they was ashamed of it themself.
So, they just transmitted to yiu this feeling of utter shame... you cannot find reason of. And genes of idiocy. ;-P
Oh, and that realities of Russian World that come to you in your dream: like drinking vodka and shitting on the streets... from backside, or frontside. That are somehow so enticing, but same time as you was taught that doing it is wrong... that's why you cannot help it, for it to slip off your tongue.
How my psychoanalysis to you? ;-P
You're putting up so much flak to indicate my target has been destroyed.
It's hilarious to me that the only delusional imbecilic animal-raping Russian here is crying foul. I've identified the Russian, I've gone too far lol
Now your task is to outline if you're an animal-raping imbecile because you're Russian or in spite of being Russian, a distinction I don't give a fuck about.
Continue-continue, patient. :-)))
\\It's hilarious...
Contre-factual, again. (yawn)
If that is so much fun to you... WHY you constantly running away, Nigero? ;=)
\\...animal-raping imbecile...
After we found this your self-identification... there lot's of things we can extract off you more... or not?
Well, you didn't answered to "Whose Crimea?". That way you self-identified yourself to be from Russian Progojon's troll farm... now that makes it exciting. Given that you are gene-chimeric skunk and perrot. What ELSE genes was added to that mix? Was there at least something human in that Dr.Moro's experiments? ;-P
As someone at least self-aware enough to freely admit to their imbecility, you theoretically should be able to strain yourself to figure out why I don't answer imbecilic questions given your advance notice that I do not want to be in a discussion with an imbecile.
It is not my fault, nor is it my concern that you are unable to reconcile reality with your imbecility.
So, you decided to double-down on flauntin. JUST THE SAME as any first Prigojin's troll would do.
Now you totally busted. ;-P
Another way. What problem would pose to you to answer simple question -- Whose Crimea?
Well, about you "don't wanting being in a discussion" -- lame bragging. You are not "not wanting", you are bona fide incapable. :-)))
And now we reveal more and more reasons behind it. And that is damn interesting. So, continue-continue.
Reality? Reality is that -- that you mentally degraded who-knw-what :-)))))
So, there is only ONE thing you can say about Reality -- it's to demonstrate subtle traits of your idiotic mind, with your bechavior.
Engrish?
Dementia? :-))))))))))))))
I'm pretty sure you are trying to say something, but you need to say it in English.
I see. Dementia. :-))))))
I see illiteracy compounded by imbecility. At least you're consistent.
What Is Dementia? - CDC
www.cdc.gov › aging › dementia
Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing ...
Go check closest neurologists ASAP.
Maybe that is not too late and there is some new miraculous drug that can keep your mind from degradation.
That is my sincere and kind suggestion to you. No bullshit talks. No smearing.
We all mortal. We all age.
BUT.
That sincerity and humanism will be ignored in a jiffy.
So.
You can continue going to your shaman who will continue to say to you that his mixture from poisonous mashrooms is that miraculous drug that can make you "sound intelligent" and most important feel yourself inteligent and all that folks from CDC are worthless shamans. :-)))))))))))))
Post a Comment