predisent Dotard (yesterday): ..."we had to close our country -- we had to close our economy. ...I had to turn it off to get to a point where we are today".
Fauci waants to keep it closed due for the "inevitable" round 2 of the virus... only inevitaaable becaause of the shutdown in round one that he demanded. The guys a buffoon. There will NEVER be another stupid lockdown. EVER.
FYI, the purpose of the lock down was to give the Dotard administration time to ramp up testing. Unfortunately they are refusing to do so. Instead Dotard lies about "maximum testing". Dotard must be the dumbest president ever. With the dumbest supporters ever.
Of course we can't lock down forever. It seems that Dotard WANTS as many people to die as possible. And the poor and middle class to suffer as much as possible. Given that there was no point in doing a lock down UNLESS testing was ramped up. Dotard is the buffoon, not Fauci.
The purpose of the lockdown was to flatten a curve that never rose high enough to require flaattening. None of the preplanned "surge" capacity, like the Javirz Center, or the USS Comfort was even used except nominally.
Fuck testing! Open up the country. This plague prevention IS the plague.
Then why is Dotard lying about "maximum testing"? And 65k people dead in 4 months is not enough for you? Opening the country without testing will get those numbers WAY up. So you may soon have your wish. Although you'll just lie about the (what is sure to be an) under count being a "hoax".
Who needs testing when every Covid like flu death gets tacked onto the Covid death tally w/o EVER being tested? You've already rigged the game to get a high COVID death count long after the epidemic ends(and its already over).
Maybe. I don't know what a "deaath count" is. Something wrong with your "A" key? You seem to get two As a lot when you only need one. As for the deAth count figures, I believe them to be as accurate as possible (and an UNDERcount).
To get a more accurate comparison, one must start with the number of directly confirmed flu deaths, which the CDC tracks on an annual basis. In the past seven flu seasons, going back to 2013, that tally fluctuated between 3,448 and 15,620 deaths.
Note that these numbers are very different from the CDC’s final official flu death estimates. For 2018-2019, for instance, the 7,172 confirmed flu deaths translated to a final estimate of between 26,339 and 52,664 deaths. Again, that’s because the CDC plugs the confirmed deaths into a model that attempts to adjust for what many epidemiologists believe is a severe undercount.
Now, let’s add a bar for this season’s covid-19 deaths, which as of this writing stands at 63,259, and which will be even higher by the time you read this. Note the drastic change in the y-axis to accommodate the scale of covid-19 mortality.
Only with COVID we have a severe OVERCOUNT as every elderly death is now attributed to the virus,
Sea Level Rise Is Accelerating: 4 Inches Per Decade (or More) by 2100 (excerpt) The rate of sea level rise is accelerating so fast that some coastal communities could confront an additional 4 inches per decade by the end of the century -- a growing concern now confirmed by thorough measurements from space. [end excerpt]
Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. (excerpt) ... in the case of climate change, Republicans (conservatives) are especially skeptical of the relevant science, particularly when they are compared with Democrats (liberals). What causes such radical group differences? We suggest, as have previous accounts, that this phenomenon is often motivated. However, the source of this motivation is not necessarily an aversion to the problem, per se, but an aversion to the solutions associated with the problem. [end excerpt]
No,. we know the difference between skin-in-the-game experts and theoretical/ academic no-skin-in-the-game experts. If you pay for climate science, they will come...
The only fact in evidence is a correlation between increased CO2 presence in historically warmer geological periods. And history is always written by the victor. ;)
24 comments:
Thanks Dotard!
predisent Dotard (yesterday): ..."we had to close our country -- we had to close our economy. ...I had to turn it off to get to a point where we are today".
Fauci waants to keep it closed due for the "inevitable" round 2 of the virus... only inevitaaable becaause of the shutdown in round one that he demanded. The guys a buffoon. There will NEVER be another stupid lockdown. EVER.
Meanwhile Dotard DEMANDS hamberders. Even if it means meat processing employees die.
FYI, the purpose of the lock down was to give the Dotard administration time to ramp up testing. Unfortunately they are refusing to do so. Instead Dotard lies about "maximum testing". Dotard must be the dumbest president ever. With the dumbest supporters ever.
Of course we can't lock down forever. It seems that Dotard WANTS as many people to die as possible. And the poor and middle class to suffer as much as possible. Given that there was no point in doing a lock down UNLESS testing was ramped up. Dotard is the buffoon, not Fauci.
Putin's agent is actively attempting to take down America (and succeeding). He MUST go! #WorstPresidentEver #FireTrump #TrumpCrimesCommission
The purpose of the lockdown was to flatten a curve that never rose high enough to require flaattening. None of the preplanned "surge" capacity, like the Javirz Center, or the USS Comfort was even used except nominally.
Fuck testing! Open up the country. This plague prevention IS the plague.
Then why is Dotard lying about "maximum testing"? And 65k people dead in 4 months is not enough for you? Opening the country without testing will get those numbers WAY up. So you may soon have your wish. Although you'll just lie about the (what is sure to be an) under count being a "hoax".
Who needs testing when every Covid like flu death gets tacked onto the Covid death tally w/o EVER being tested? You've already rigged the game to get a high COVID death count long after the epidemic ends(and its already over).
Your deaath count IS a HOAX!
Maybe. I don't know what a "deaath count" is. Something wrong with your "A" key? You seem to get two As a lot when you only need one. As for the deAth count figures, I believe them to be as accurate as possible (and an UNDERcount).
Their accuracy, much like the numbers tested, is a fallacy.
How the flu " death count" is faked
To get a more accurate comparison, one must start with the number of directly confirmed flu deaths, which the CDC tracks on an annual basis. In the past seven flu seasons, going back to 2013, that tally fluctuated between 3,448 and 15,620 deaths.
Note that these numbers are very different from the CDC’s final official flu death estimates. For 2018-2019, for instance, the 7,172 confirmed flu deaths translated to a final estimate of between 26,339 and 52,664 deaths. Again, that’s because the CDC plugs the confirmed deaths into a model that attempts to adjust for what many epidemiologists believe is a severe undercount.
Now, let’s add a bar for this season’s covid-19 deaths, which as of this writing stands at 63,259, and which will be even higher by the time you read this. Note the drastic change in the y-axis to accommodate the scale of covid-19 mortality.
Only with COVID we have a severe OVERCOUNT as every elderly death is now attributed to the virus,
Fuck your models. There's no science in it.
The CDC flu Counts are as phoney as the crowd estimates at DC inaugurals and Al Gores sea level rises.
So... pretty accurate.
lol! *glub, glub….*
Sea Level Rise Is Accelerating: 4 Inches Per Decade (or More) by 2100 (excerpt) The rate of sea level rise is accelerating so fast that some coastal communities could confront an additional 4 inches per decade by the end of the century -- a growing concern now confirmed by thorough measurements from space. [end excerpt]
lol! Are you sure that the satellites simply aren't slowing down?
Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. (excerpt) ... in the case of climate change, Republicans (conservatives) are especially skeptical of the relevant science, particularly when they are compared with Democrats (liberals). What causes such radical group differences? We suggest, as have previous accounts, that this phenomenon is often motivated. However, the source of this motivation is not necessarily an aversion to the problem, per se, but an aversion to the solutions associated with the problem. [end excerpt]
No,. we know the difference between skin-in-the-game experts and theoretical/ academic no-skin-in-the-game experts. If you pay for climate science, they will come...
Democrats are like Mulder in the X-Files... they Want to Believe!
It gives all their futile recycling efforts "meaning" and "purpose".
The X-Files TV show was fiction. Experts study facts. No surprise that you can't distinguish between the two.
lol! What facts would those be? That CO2 increases cause warming, or that CO2 increases result from warming?
The only fact in evidence is a correlation between increased CO2 presence in historically warmer geological periods. And history is always written by the victor. ;)
Post a Comment