Politics turned Parody from within a Conservative Bastion inside the People's Republic of Maryland
Tuesday, February 6, 2024
Sinthome as Thought Crimes for the Symptom of an Exclusive Ideology
Can you enjoy the Bolshoi or interview the President of Russia and NOT be a Putin-lover? Can't the aesthetics of music and ballet (and journalism) live and exist OUTSIDE of the political realm in a separate, but more inclusive cultural realm?
We should want to hear questions that come from the perspective of a Putin puppet? Not wanting to hear from a Putin puppet is "madness"? Who knew?
Tucker Carlson should be banned from reentering the US? If only he could be... Glenn Greenwald too. He can stay in Brazil and Carlson can stay in Russia. How about Greenwald and Carlson both be stripped of their US citizenship? Unfortunately it isn't Constitutional :-((((
It's uncondtitutional to strip US Citizens of their citizenship? The Roosevelt/Truman Democrats did just that to the Japanese born here in the USA around the end of WW2 when they were being deported to Japan for no good reason after being put into the prison camps.
Mystere said no such thing. The post is written by me, Rattrapper. And you fell for the bait, Dervish. The title expressed what that crying lowlife RINO Kinzinger accused TC of doing.
Minus: Why doesn't a MSM Journo interview Putin then? Oh, that's right. They're not "allowed".
Oh, turns out that is a LIE. Tucker's lie, which Minus believes unquestionably.
Christiane Amanpour@amanpour: Does Tucker really think we journalists haven't been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full scale invasion of Ukraine? It's absurd -- we'll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now. link
Mystere: Mystere said no such thing. The post is written by me, Rattrapper. And you fell for the bait, Dervish.
I OF COURSE knew that the title of Mystere's post was Adam Kinzinger's words and NOT what Mystere believes. But I (above) attributed the sentiment to Mystere -- and Mystere fell for MY bait. LOL! How gullible. Mystere has not EARED the title of dumbest blogger ever for no reason. #MystereDumbestBloggerEver.
rightturds are all extremely gullible. Minus likely believes Christiane Amanpour lied. Well, one of them is lying, and it surely can't be Tucker. Right, Minus? Journalists aren't "allowed" to interview Putin.
"Mr Carlson is not correct" ... Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday. Mr Peskov went on to say that the Kremlin receives "numerous requests" for interviews from Western media, which are all denied because the Kremlin does not deem the media outlets impartial.
Yevgenia Albats, a Russian journalist and author of a book about the KGB ... "I am like hundreds of Russian journalists who have had to go into exile to keep reporting about the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. The alternative was to go to jail. And now this SOB [Tucker] is teaching us about good journalism, shooting from the $1,000 Ritz suite in Moscow" she wrote on Twitter.
Qtard's gullibility causes it to believe facts are "Demn propaganda" and rightturd (and Putin) propaganda is facts that it "knows". Like how dotard donald is being "politically persecuted" by his opponent Joe Biden, the J6 insurrectionists were protesting a stolen election (their "human right"), and that it is Democrats who are opposed to helping Ukraine defend itself -- because "Ukrainians are Nazis".
Putin is likely very happy that gullible rightturds like Qtard are parroting his lies. That Qtard pretends to be angry about the slaughter of Ukrainians and that US aid is being stalled -- lends more credibility to its delusional narrative that its the evil DEMS and the Demon Bi-den who are the ones stalling the aid. It gives cover to the actual puppets -- dotard donald and his maga republiturds.
It isn't republicans the puppet Qtard claims -- they have a "plan for victory in Ukraine", it screeches. Even though they aren't turning this plan into legislation and demanding House Speaker Mike Johnson put it up for a vote -- because it is FAKE. The Putin puppet Qtard says Democrats should "find a way" to pass it. Because the republicans can't pass in the House. Because they are not in government. Somehow. Even though they have the majority in the House.
Mystere: It's uncondtitutional to strip US Citizens of their citizenship? The Roosevelt/Truman Democrats did just that to the Japanese born here in the USA around the end of WW2 when they were being deported to Japan for no good reason after being put into the prison camps.
No. They were not stripped of their US citizenship (because that is unconstitutional), they renounced their US citizenship. But I don't know why you bring this up. You think Tucker Carlson should renounce his US citizenship, Mystere?
Minus: So how many Russian journo's have interviewed Biden? Would he accept a Tucker Carlson interview request? ...how about Glenn Greenwald? Aaron Mate? Joe Rogan?
Why would Joe Biden agree to any of these interviews? When is Dementia Donald going to sit down for an interview with Rachel Maddow? He isn't up to the task?
\\ Qtard's gullibility causes it to believe facts are "Demn propaganda" and rightturd (and Putin) propaganda is facts that it "knows".
Yawn.
YET ONE factual confirmation that said "Qtard" is alter-ego of the poster.
As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
Narrative, repeated and perpetuated by DEMN-aligned media.
And narrative it claimed "being fact and truth"(even though NO factual evidances like video or audio provided, it all was from words of DEMN propogandist AKA CNN reporter). ;-P
Self-referential talks.
Yawn.
\\And the imbecile thinks this lie is believable!
Yeah.
You. Same as your puppet-master liliPut looks like REALLY DO THiNK that such your lies are believable.
Well, not surprising... as IT showed many times and admitted it ITSELF being able to believe in any bullshit...
Qtard: YET ONE factual confirmation that said "Qtard" is alter-ego of the poster.
Yes, the poster of the comment I am replying to. I have never called facts I don't like "Demn propaganda". Those are your words. Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!
Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie. The puppet Qtard repeats Putin's false narratives about the J6 insurrectionists and it's puppet, dotard donald.
Qtard: Narrative, repeated and perpetuated by DEMN-aligned media.
Narrative repeated and perpetuated by republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
Qtard: You. Same as your puppet-master liliPut looks like REALLY DO THiNK that such your lies are believable.
Your puppet master whom you repeat after word for word. Re his puppet dotard donald and dotard donald's insurrectionist magaturds.
Qtard: Well, not surprising... as IT showed many times and admitted it ITSELF being able to believe in any bullshit...
It did admit that. BUT it said it "knows" the bullshit. Because the foreigner from far far away (nicknamed "Qtard") is a cretin.
Minus: he's an old senile man says DoJ....
Did not. Special counsel Robert Hur said that. Because he is a partisan hack. He knew Joe Biden could not be charged, so he attacked him with false ad hominem.
Minus: Unlike President Biden, DoJ deems Trump "mentally competent".
Robert Hur again? Or you think (in your delusions) AG Garland said anything like that? Why would he?
He was convinced of dotard donald's "mental competence" when donald insisted he offered Nikki Haley 10,000 soldiers to protect the Capitol in J6 but Nikki Haley turned him down? :P
Merrick Garland has proven himself to be a bad choice for AG. His appointment of the Republican partisan as a special counsel to investigate the Biden documents case is yet another example.
Dervish Sanders February 9, 2024 at 8:36 AM "Merrick Garland has proven himself to be a bad choice for AG. His appointment of the Republican partisan as a special counsel to investigate the Biden documents case is yet another example."
Merrick Garland has proven himself to be the most brilliant choice for AG. His actions to investigate Donald Trump and the Trump Documents expose the Biden Administration and make them an example of corruption. 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
\\Yes, the poster of the comment I am replying to. I have never called facts I don't like "Demn propaganda".
Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts. ;-P
"Something-something said by someone-someone" -- remember???
WITHOUT ANY physical factual evidances. Mere babbling. As "being facts".
Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda. Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda??? In accordance with certain one cretin. ;-P
\\Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!
Trying to enlarge itself, still?
You are bona fide cretin. ;-P
Which ADMITTED constantly forgetting things... but, you already FORGOT it? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
\\No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie.
So?
There is NO nazis among Ukrainians?
\\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
If one would need ONE SINGLE fact to confirm your cretinity -- this one would suffice.
To call INDIVIDUAL... a "republiturd-aligned media"???? %))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts.
No.
Qtard: "Something-something said by someone-someone" -- remember???
Your moronity? Yes, I remember.
Qtard: WITHOUT ANY physical factual evidances. Mere babbling. As "being facts".
Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile.
Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda.
Climate change.
Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???
No.
Qtard: In accordance with certain one cretin.
You?
Qtard: \\Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!\\ Trying to enlarge itself, still?
I never have. Enlargement has been proven to not work.
Qtard: You are bona fide cretin.
Wrote "you" when you meant "I".
Qtard: Which ADMITTED constantly forgetting things... but, you already FORGOT it?
I made no admission of "constantly forgetting" to forget.
Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis"\\ No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie\\ So? There is NO nazis among Ukrainians?
I answered that question many times previously. You forgot what I said?
Qtard: \\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example\\ If one would need ONE SINGLE fact to confirm your cretinity -- this one would suffice.
Wrote "your" when it meant "I".
Qtard: To call INDIVIDUAL... a "republiturd-aligned media"????
Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media.
\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts.
\\ No.
NewSpeak "Yes".
Yawn.
\\Your moronity? Yes, I remember.
I'm glad that you remember that I have called you "Your moronity". ;-P
But.
Now I know that you are cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But... it seems like this NEW info still cannot find a place in your narrow mind of a cretin. ;-P
\\Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile.
Like you cretin EVER did it??? Ever ABLE to do it??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
\\Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda.
\\Climate change.
Yeah.
Climate that thing what changes constantly.
All About Climate National Geographic Society https://www.nationalgeographic.org › ... Climate is the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area. Weather can change from hour-to-hour, day-to-day, month-to-month or even year- ...
And that's mean that "climate change" -- it's moronic propaganda babbling. ;-p
But.
How'd cretin IT could know it? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
IT dunno Science. IT only repeats after Propaganda.
\\Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???
\\No.
\\Qtard: You are bona fide cretin.
\\Wrote "you" when you meant "I".
And why you constantly writing "you" instead of "I"? ;-P
Are you crazy? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media. \\ \\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
Clearly.
Certin talking about its (imaginary) alter-ego "Imbecile". ;-P
Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes".
No.
Qtard: \\Your moronity? Yes, I remember\\ I'm glad that you remember that I have called you "Your moronity".
No. I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda".
Qtard: Now I know that you are cretin. But... it seems like this NEW info still cannot find a place in your narrow mind of a cretin.
No, it can't. Why it calls new info "propaganda".
Qtard: \\Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile\\ Like you cretin EVER did it??? Ever ABLE to do it???
No. Clearly you are NOT ABLE.
Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda\\ Climate change\\ Yeah. Climate that thing what changes constantly. All About Climate National Geographic Society https://www.nationalgeographic.org › ... Climate is the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area. Weather can change from hour-to-hour, day-to-day, month-to-month or even year- ... And that's mean that "climate change"...
No.
Climate Change: Definition From the United Nations... Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. These shifts may be natural, but since the 1800s, human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels (like coal, oil, and gas) which produces heat-trapping gases.
THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling".
Qtard: How'd cretin IT could know it? IT dunno Science. IT only repeats after Propaganda.
Self referring talks.
Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???\\No\\
What? No, "NewSpeak Yes"?
Qtard: You are bona fide cretin\\ Wrote "you" when you meant "I"\\ And why you constantly writing "you" instead of "I"?
I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?
Qtard: Are you crazy?
IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy.
Qtard: \\Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media\\ republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example. Clearly. Certin talking about its (imaginary) alter-ego "Imbecile".
That is YOUR alter ego. Thinks an example means that one person is the entire republiturd-aligned media.
Qtard: NewSpeak "Yes"?
Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile".
\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes".
\\ No.
Yeah.
Confirmation.
That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
\\I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda".
Cretin STILL insist that "somebody-somebody babbling something-somthing" is facts.
Yawn. :-))))))))))))))))))))00
\\THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling".
Yeah.
Propaganda slogan. ;-P
You give CORRECT ref here -- congratualtion!
\\I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?
Who knows.
You are one who keep saying not remembering OWN words, assuming opponent lying... even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words... and many more such cretinic activity.
So????
Who knows... what IT talks about. ;-P
Probably. IT -- and it's you who is definite cretin -- dunno ITSELF. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
That's why I, as much smarter opponent, must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. ;-P
Like.
Here.
Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. ;-P
\\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy.
Who can say what IT meant? ;-P
That it admitted being crazy?
Or... maybe that IT asking ITSELF "am I crazy"???
Or... some more burrish bullshit.
That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
But.
No biggy.
That is what analyzing "noisy data" is about.
MOST IMPORTANT skill for anybody who do/know Science.
And I am skillful in it. Well... as any smart dude who knows facts and logic. ;-)
\\Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile".
Thank you.
For this. YET ONE Perfect Example of your cretinism. ;-P
It will some into my ledger of statistics of all your precious excesses of your cretinism. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. There's still lots of space in my ledger. To account your cretinism more, MORE, MOAAAAR. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Qtard: \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes". \\ No. Yeah. Confirmation. That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
No.
Qtard: \\I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda". Cretin STILL insist that "somebody-somebody babbling something-somthing" is facts.
"Somebody-somebody" is one of your alter egos? One that babbles and you say that babbling is facts? Yeah, I agree.
Qtard: \\THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling". Yeah. Propaganda slogan.
To a cretin like you.
Qtard: \\I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?\\ Who knows.
Not cretins like you, that's for sure.
Qtard: You are one who keep saying not remembering OWN words...
No.
Qtard: ...assuming opponent lying...
Because you do. All the time.
Qtard: ...even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words...
One such lie.
Qtard: and many more such cretinic activity.
Yes. From you.
Qtard: So???? Who knows... what IT talks about.
You're right. Often it is hard to know what you are babbling about.
Qtard: Probably. IT -- and it's you who is definite cretin -- dunno ITSELF.
It is talking to itself. It admits itself don't even know what it is talking about.
Qtard: That's why I, as much smarter opponent...
LOL!
Qtard: ...must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. Like. Here. Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. \\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy\\ Who can say what IT meant?
That YOU are "it" and that YOU are crazy.
Qtard: That it admitted being crazy?
That was MY comment, not yours. The "it" I was referring to is YOU. I admitted YOU are crazy.
Qtard: Or... maybe that IT asking ITSELF "am crazy"???
Are you asking yourself that question?
Or... some more burrish bullshit. That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
Qtard explains why I can't take it's answers "as is". Gotcha.
Qtard: But. No biggy. That is what analyzing "noisy data" is about. MOST IMPORTANT skill for anybody who do/know Science. And I am skillful in it. Well... as any smart dude who knows facts and logic.
LOL!
Qtard: \\Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile"\\Thank you. For this. YET ONE Perfect Example of your cretinism.
Obviously you meant to write "my cretinism".
Qtard: It will some into my ledger of statistics of all your precious excesses of your cretinism. Continue-continue, cretin. There's still lots of space in my ledger. To account your cretinism more, MORE, MOAAAAR. **moronic laughter and drooling**
\\Qtard: \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes". \\ No. Yeah. Confirmation. That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
\\No.
NewSpeak "Yes".
\\"Somebody-somebody" is one of your alter egos? One that babbles and you say that babbling is facts? Yeah, I agree.
Yeah... definite cretinism.
Demonstrated yet one time.
Yawn.
\\To a cretin like you.
I cited climate scientists.
But cretin calling em "cretins"... for they not use propaganda babbling too? ;-P
\\Qtard: ...assuming opponent lying...
\\Because you do. All the time.
Then... quote MY words.
And explain -- how it is lie.
But you can't. Because cretin. ;-P
\\Qtard: ...even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words...
\\One such lie.
Yeah.
One of many your cretinic lies. :-)))))))))))))0
\\It is talking to itself. It admits itself don't even know what it is talking about.
Yawn.
I know that much about you... IT. ;-P
\\Qtard: ...must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. Like. Here. Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. \\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy\\ Who can say what IT meant?
\\That YOU are "it" and that YOU are crazy.
Yeah.
Like this one more case of using "you" instead of "I".
Thank you for adding more items to my statistics of your cretinism, IT. ;-P
\\Qtard: That it admitted being crazy?
\\That was MY comment, not yours. The "it" I was referring to is YOU. I admitted YOU are crazy.
Yeah.
They all yours. ;-P
But... you keep forgetting em being yours... just that moment when I, as much smarter opponent -- show how cretinic they are.
Start babbling "no, that is YOUR words"... while not able to provide factual quotes and explain.
Because all such claims is nothing else but cretinic counter-factual lies.
\\Or... some more burrish bullshit. That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
\\Qtard explains why I can't take it's answers "as is". Gotcha.
You cretin cannot get em anyway. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
You just trying to mimic my verbiage... as cretinic parrot.
Totally without clue why MY words matter, and why your cretinic retorts -- never will. ;-P
28 comments:
We should want to hear questions that come from the perspective of a Putin puppet? Not wanting to hear from a Putin puppet is "madness"? Who knew?
Tucker Carlson should be banned from reentering the US? If only he could be... Glenn Greenwald too. He can stay in Brazil and Carlson can stay in Russia. How about Greenwald and Carlson both be stripped of their US citizenship? Unfortunately it isn't Constitutional :-((((
Mystere agrees that Tucker Carlson is guilty of treason.
Why doesn't a MSM Journo interview Putin then? Oh, that's right. They're not "allowed".
Maybe because he has journalists accused of espionage and arrested? Well, except those who work for him like Tucker.
It's uncondtitutional to strip US Citizens of their citizenship? The Roosevelt/Truman Democrats did just that to the Japanese born here in the USA around the end of WW2 when they were being deported to Japan for no good reason after being put into the prison camps.
Mystere said no such thing. The post is written by me, Rattrapper. And you fell for the bait, Dervish. The title expressed what that crying lowlife RINO Kinzinger accused TC of doing.
Minus: Why doesn't a MSM Journo interview Putin then? Oh, that's right. They're not "allowed".
Oh, turns out that is a LIE. Tucker's lie, which Minus believes unquestionably.
Christiane Amanpour@amanpour: Does Tucker really think we journalists haven't been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full scale invasion of Ukraine? It's absurd -- we'll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now. link
Mystere: Mystere said no such thing. The post is written by me, Rattrapper. And you fell for the bait, Dervish.
I OF COURSE knew that the title of Mystere's post was Adam Kinzinger's words and NOT what Mystere believes. But I (above) attributed the sentiment to Mystere -- and Mystere fell for MY bait. LOL! How gullible. Mystere has not EARED the title of dumbest blogger ever for no reason. #MystereDumbestBloggerEver.
rightturds are all extremely gullible. Minus likely believes Christiane Amanpour lied. Well, one of them is lying, and it surely can't be Tucker. Right, Minus? Journalists aren't "allowed" to interview Putin.
LOL.
"Mr Carlson is not correct" ... Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday. Mr Peskov went on to say that the Kremlin receives "numerous requests" for interviews from Western media, which are all denied because the Kremlin does not deem the media outlets impartial.
Yevgenia Albats, a Russian journalist and author of a book about the KGB ... "I am like hundreds of Russian journalists who have had to go into exile to keep reporting about the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. The alternative was to go to jail. And now this SOB [Tucker] is teaching us about good journalism, shooting from the $1,000 Ritz suite in Moscow" she wrote on Twitter.
Qtard's gullibility causes it to believe facts are "Demn propaganda" and rightturd (and Putin) propaganda is facts that it "knows". Like how dotard donald is being "politically persecuted" by his opponent Joe Biden, the J6 insurrectionists were protesting a stolen election (their "human right"), and that it is Democrats who are opposed to helping Ukraine defend itself -- because "Ukrainians are Nazis".
Putin is likely very happy that gullible rightturds like Qtard are parroting his lies. That Qtard pretends to be angry about the slaughter of Ukrainians and that US aid is being stalled -- lends more credibility to its delusional narrative that its the evil DEMS and the Demon Bi-den who are the ones stalling the aid. It gives cover to the actual puppets -- dotard donald and his maga republiturds.
It isn't republicans the puppet Qtard claims -- they have a "plan for victory in Ukraine", it screeches. Even though they aren't turning this plan into legislation and demanding House Speaker Mike Johnson put it up for a vote -- because it is FAKE. The Putin puppet Qtard says Democrats should "find a way" to pass it. Because the republicans can't pass in the House. Because they are not in government. Somehow. Even though they have the majority in the House.
And the imbecile thinks this lie is believable!
So how many Russian journo's have interviewed Biden? Would he accept a Tucker Carlson interview request?
...how about Glenn Greenwald? Aaron Mate? Joe Rogan?
...or isn't Dementia Joe up to the task?
Mystere: It's uncondtitutional to strip US Citizens of their citizenship? The Roosevelt/Truman Democrats did just that to the Japanese born here in the USA around the end of WW2 when they were being deported to Japan for no good reason after being put into the prison camps.
No. They were not stripped of their US citizenship (because that is unconstitutional), they renounced their US citizenship. But I don't know why you bring this up. You think Tucker Carlson should renounce his US citizenship, Mystere?
Minus: So how many Russian journo's have interviewed Biden? Would he accept a Tucker Carlson interview request? ...how about Glenn Greenwald? Aaron Mate? Joe Rogan?
Why would Joe Biden agree to any of these interviews? When is Dementia Donald going to sit down for an interview with Rachel Maddow? He isn't up to the task?
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard's gullibility causes it to believe facts are "Demn propaganda" and rightturd (and Putin) propaganda is facts that it "knows".
Yawn.
YET ONE factual confirmation that said "Qtard" is alter-ego of the poster.
As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
Narrative, repeated and perpetuated by DEMN-aligned media.
And narrative it claimed "being fact and truth"(even though NO factual evidances like video or audio provided, it all was from words of DEMN propogandist AKA CNN reporter). ;-P
Self-referential talks.
Yawn.
\\And the imbecile thinks this lie is believable!
Yeah.
You. Same as your puppet-master liliPut looks like REALLY DO THiNK that such your lies are believable.
Well, not surprising... as IT showed many times and admitted it ITSELF being able to believe in any bullshit...
Because U R CRETIN.
Yawn.
Biden can't even betray the US with classified documents, he's an old senile man says DoJ....
Unlike President Biden, DoJ deems Trump "mentally competent".
Qtard: YET ONE factual confirmation that said "Qtard" is alter-ego of the poster.
Yes, the poster of the comment I am replying to. I have never called facts I don't like "Demn propaganda". Those are your words. Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!
Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie. The puppet Qtard repeats Putin's false narratives about the J6 insurrectionists and it's puppet, dotard donald.
Qtard: Narrative, repeated and perpetuated by DEMN-aligned media.
Narrative repeated and perpetuated by republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
Qtard: You. Same as your puppet-master liliPut looks like REALLY DO THiNK that such your lies are believable.
Your puppet master whom you repeat after word for word. Re his puppet dotard donald and dotard donald's insurrectionist magaturds.
Qtard: Well, not surprising... as IT showed many times and admitted it ITSELF being able to believe in any bullshit...
It did admit that. BUT it said it "knows" the bullshit. Because the foreigner from far far away (nicknamed "Qtard") is a cretin.
Minus: he's an old senile man says DoJ....
Did not. Special counsel Robert Hur said that. Because he is a partisan hack. He knew Joe Biden could not be charged, so he attacked him with false ad hominem.
Minus: Unlike President Biden, DoJ deems Trump "mentally competent".
Robert Hur again? Or you think (in your delusions) AG Garland said anything like that? Why would he?
He was convinced of dotard donald's "mental competence" when donald insisted he offered Nikki Haley 10,000 soldiers to protect the Capitol in J6 but Nikki Haley turned him down? :P
Merrick Garland has proven himself to be a bad choice for AG. His appointment of the Republican partisan as a special counsel to investigate the Biden documents case is yet another example.
Dervish Sanders February 9, 2024 at 8:36 AM "Merrick Garland has proven himself to be a bad choice for AG. His appointment of the Republican partisan as a special counsel to investigate the Biden documents case is yet another example."
Merrick Garland has proven himself to be the most brilliant choice for AG. His actions to investigate Donald Trump and the Trump Documents expose the Biden Administration and make them an example of corruption. 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Got Pepcid AC, Dervish?😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
🎵When you have Nausea, Heartburn, Indigestion, Upset Stomach, Diarrhea🎶😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Mystere: Got Pepcid AC, Dervish?
You need some, Mystere? Worrying about dotard donald going to prison is upsetting your tummy? LOL!
\\Yes, the poster of the comment I am replying to. I have never called facts I don't like "Demn propaganda".
Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts. ;-P
"Something-something said by someone-someone" -- remember???
WITHOUT ANY physical factual evidances. Mere babbling. As "being facts".
Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda. Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda??? In accordance with certain one cretin. ;-P
\\Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!
Trying to enlarge itself, still?
You are bona fide cretin. ;-P
Which ADMITTED constantly forgetting things... but, you already FORGOT it? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
\\Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis".
\\No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie.
So?
There is NO nazis among Ukrainians?
\\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
If one would need ONE SINGLE fact to confirm your cretinity -- this one would suffice.
To call INDIVIDUAL... a "republiturd-aligned media"???? %))))))))))))))))))))))))))000
Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts.
No.
Qtard: "Something-something said by someone-someone" -- remember???
Your moronity? Yes, I remember.
Qtard: WITHOUT ANY physical factual evidances. Mere babbling. As "being facts".
Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile.
Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda.
Climate change.
Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???
No.
Qtard: In accordance with certain one cretin.
You?
Qtard: \\Imbecile can NOT remember it's OWN words!\\ Trying to enlarge itself, still?
I never have. Enlargement has been proven to not work.
Qtard: You are bona fide cretin.
Wrote "you" when you meant "I".
Qtard: Which ADMITTED constantly forgetting things... but, you already FORGOT it?
I made no admission of "constantly forgetting" to forget.
Qtard: As it numerous times repeated liliPut's false narrative about "Ukrainian nazis"\\ No. I have refuted that false narrative. I refute it now. It is a lie\\ So? There is NO nazis among Ukrainians?
I answered that question many times previously. You forgot what I said?
Qtard: \\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example\\ If one would need ONE SINGLE fact to confirm your cretinity -- this one would suffice.
Wrote "your" when it meant "I".
Qtard: To call INDIVIDUAL... a "republiturd-aligned media"????
Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media.
\\ Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts.
\\ No.
NewSpeak "Yes".
Yawn.
\\Your moronity? Yes, I remember.
I'm glad that you remember that I have called you "Your moronity". ;-P
But.
Now I know that you are cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))0
But... it seems like this NEW info still cannot find a place in your narrow mind of a cretin. ;-P
\\Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile.
Like you cretin EVER did it??? Ever ABLE to do it??? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))00
\\Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda.
\\Climate change.
Yeah.
Climate that thing what changes constantly.
All About Climate
National Geographic Society
https://www.nationalgeographic.org › ...
Climate is the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area. Weather can change from hour-to-hour, day-to-day, month-to-month or even year- ...
And that's mean that "climate change" -- it's moronic propaganda babbling. ;-p
But.
How'd cretin IT could know it? :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
IT dunno Science. IT only repeats after Propaganda.
\\Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???
\\No.
\\Qtard: You are bona fide cretin.
\\Wrote "you" when you meant "I".
And why you constantly writing "you" instead of "I"? ;-P
Are you crazy? :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media.
\\
\\republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example.
Clearly.
Certin talking about its (imaginary) alter-ego "Imbecile". ;-P
NewSpeak "Yes"? ;-P
Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes".
No.
Qtard: \\Your moronity? Yes, I remember\\ I'm glad that you remember that I have called you "Your moronity".
No. I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda".
Qtard: Now I know that you are cretin. But... it seems like this NEW info still cannot find a place in your narrow mind of a cretin.
No, it can't. Why it calls new info "propaganda".
Qtard: \\Gathering data and analyzing it. Writing up findings in papers to be peer reviewed -- Qtard calls that "babbling". That is how we know Qtard is an imbecile\\ Like you cretin EVER did it??? Ever ABLE to do it???
No. Clearly you are NOT ABLE.
Qtard: Or... you can try to provide QUOTE... and show where I wrongly call FACTS a propaganda\\ Climate change\\ Yeah. Climate that thing what changes constantly. All About Climate National Geographic Society https://www.nationalgeographic.org › ...
Climate is the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area. Weather can change from hour-to-hour, day-to-day, month-to-month or even year- ... And that's mean that "climate change"...
No.
Climate Change: Definition From the United Nations... Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. These shifts may be natural, but since the 1800s, human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels (like coal, oil, and gas) which produces heat-trapping gases.
THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling".
Qtard: How'd cretin IT could know it? IT dunno Science. IT only repeats after Propaganda.
Self referring talks.
Qtard: Like when I stated obvious fact -- that Sun rising in the morning... but that is -- DEMN Propaganda???\\No\\
What? No, "NewSpeak Yes"?
Qtard: You are bona fide cretin\\ Wrote "you" when you meant "I"\\ And why you constantly writing "you" instead of "I"?
I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?
Qtard: Are you crazy?
IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy.
Qtard: \\Imbecile dunno what the word "example" means. He is one person, not the entire republiturd-aligned media\\ republiturd-aligned media. Like Tucker Carlson, for example. Clearly. Certin talking about its (imaginary) alter-ego "Imbecile".
That is YOUR alter ego. Thinks an example means that one person is the entire republiturd-aligned media.
Qtard: NewSpeak "Yes"?
Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile".
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes".
\\ No.
Yeah.
Confirmation.
That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
\\I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda".
Cretin STILL insist that "somebody-somebody babbling something-somthing" is facts.
Yawn. :-))))))))))))))))))))00
\\THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling".
Yeah.
Propaganda slogan. ;-P
You give CORRECT ref here -- congratualtion!
\\I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?
Who knows.
You are one who keep saying not remembering OWN words, assuming opponent lying... even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words... and many more such cretinic activity.
So????
Who knows... what IT talks about. ;-P
Probably. IT -- and it's you who is definite cretin -- dunno ITSELF. :-)))))))))))))))))))))
That's why I, as much smarter opponent, must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. ;-P
Like.
Here.
Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. ;-P
\\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy.
Who can say what IT meant? ;-P
That it admitted being crazy?
Or... maybe that IT asking ITSELF "am I crazy"???
Or... some more burrish bullshit.
That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
But.
No biggy.
That is what analyzing "noisy data" is about.
MOST IMPORTANT skill for anybody who do/know Science.
And I am skillful in it. Well... as any smart dude who knows facts and logic. ;-)
\\Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile".
Thank you.
For this. YET ONE Perfect Example of your cretinism. ;-P
It will some into my ledger of statistics of all your precious excesses of your cretinism. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Continue-continue, cretin. There's still lots of space in my ledger. To account your cretinism more, MORE, MOAAAAR. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))0
Qtard: \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes". \\ No. Yeah. Confirmation. That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
No.
Qtard: \\I was talking about YOUR moronity of calling facts you don't like "propaganda". Cretin STILL insist that "somebody-somebody babbling something-somthing" is facts.
"Somebody-somebody" is one of your alter egos? One that babbles and you say that babbling is facts? Yeah, I agree.
Qtard: \\THAT is the climate change I was referring to. But to the cretin scientific consensus is "moronic propaganda babbling". Yeah. Propaganda slogan.
To a cretin like you.
Qtard: \\I was talking about the comment you made. You don't recognize your own words? You think I was talking about MY words?\\ Who knows.
Not cretins like you, that's for sure.
Qtard: You are one who keep saying not remembering OWN words...
No.
Qtard: ...assuming opponent lying...
Because you do. All the time.
Qtard: ...even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words...
One such lie.
Qtard: and many more such cretinic activity.
Yes. From you.
Qtard: So???? Who knows... what IT talks about.
You're right. Often it is hard to know what you are babbling about.
Qtard: Probably. IT -- and it's you who is definite cretin -- dunno ITSELF.
It is talking to itself. It admits itself don't even know what it is talking about.
Qtard: That's why I, as much smarter opponent...
LOL!
Qtard: ...must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. Like. Here. Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. \\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy\\ Who can say what IT meant?
That YOU are "it" and that YOU are crazy.
Qtard: That it admitted being crazy?
That was MY comment, not yours. The "it" I was referring to is YOU. I admitted YOU are crazy.
Qtard: Or... maybe that IT asking ITSELF "am crazy"???
Are you asking yourself that question?
Or... some more burrish bullshit. That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
Qtard explains why I can't take it's answers "as is". Gotcha.
Qtard: But. No biggy. That is what analyzing "noisy data" is about. MOST IMPORTANT skill for anybody who do/know Science. And I am skillful in it. Well... as any smart dude who knows facts and logic.
LOL!
Qtard: \\Just Yes. Not in NewSpeak. I am certain (spelled "certin" by you) that YOU are talking about your alter ego "Imbecile"\\Thank you. For this. YET ONE Perfect Example of your cretinism.
Obviously you meant to write "my cretinism".
Qtard: It will some into my ledger of statistics of all your precious excesses of your cretinism. Continue-continue, cretin. There's still lots of space in my ledger. To account your cretinism more, MORE, MOAAAAR. **moronic laughter and drooling**
Zzzzz.
\\Qtard: \\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...\\ Qtard: Naaah... you calling DEMN Propaganda as being facts\\ No\\ NewSpeak "Yes". \\ No. Yeah. Confirmation. That it was NewSpeak "Yes".
\\No.
NewSpeak "Yes".
\\"Somebody-somebody" is one of your alter egos? One that babbles and you say that babbling is facts? Yeah, I agree.
Yeah... definite cretinism.
Demonstrated yet one time.
Yawn.
\\To a cretin like you.
I cited climate scientists.
But cretin calling em "cretins"... for they not use propaganda babbling too? ;-P
\\Qtard: ...assuming opponent lying...
\\Because you do. All the time.
Then... quote MY words.
And explain -- how it is lie.
But you can't. Because cretin. ;-P
\\Qtard: ...even when providing factual quotes, claim "never saying" about OWN words...
\\One such lie.
Yeah.
One of many your cretinic lies. :-)))))))))))))0
\\It is talking to itself. It admits itself don't even know what it is talking about.
Yawn.
I know that much about you... IT. ;-P
\\Qtard: ...must keep statistic of proven FACTS... and make my conclusions out of it... and not treat cretin's babbling as any sane and smart person talks. Like. Here. Perfect example to my claim above -- that burrish cretinic babbling CANNOT be treated as being sane. \\IT is asking ITSELF? I say IT obviously is crazy\\ Who can say what IT meant?
\\That YOU are "it" and that YOU are crazy.
Yeah.
Like this one more case of using "you" instead of "I".
Thank you for adding more items to my statistics of your cretinism, IT. ;-P
\\Qtard: That it admitted being crazy?
\\That was MY comment, not yours. The "it" I was referring to is YOU. I admitted YOU are crazy.
Yeah.
They all yours. ;-P
But... you keep forgetting em being yours... just that moment when I, as much smarter opponent -- show how cretinic they are.
Start babbling "no, that is YOUR words"... while not able to provide factual quotes and explain.
Because all such claims is nothing else but cretinic counter-factual lies.
\\Or... some more burrish bullshit. That's why it cannot be taken "as is". As it could be in conversation with sane and smart person.
\\Qtard explains why I can't take it's answers "as is". Gotcha.
You cretin cannot get em anyway. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0
You just trying to mimic my verbiage... as cretinic parrot.
Totally without clue why MY words matter, and why your cretinic retorts -- never will. ;-P
But.
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
\\Obviously you meant to write "my cretinism".
Yeah.
That's obviously what you mean all of the time. ;-P
But.
Unable to admit it properly.
Because you are cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
But.
No biggy.
I, as much smarter opponent.
Have no problem to devise what you meant from your cranky mindless babbling. ;-P
Continue-continue, cretin. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
PS Yeah. I encourage you to use your cretinic retort "Self-encouragement" here too.
For more lulz! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Post a Comment