I very seriously doubt it. "Kenneth Mayer, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was called to testify about a study he had conducted on mail ballots cast in Montana between 2006 and 2016. Over that time period, Mayer testified, there had been 7,079,953 mail/absentee ballots cast in Montana. Of that total, he had found one instance of illegal voting, where a man filled out and submitted his former wife's ballot, without her permission, for an election for a school board. That means that 0.0000001% of all mail ballots cast in Montana over a decade were cast illegally" (link).
Ballots are anonymous. The envelopes they were sent in were not. All they know is that the number of valid ballots was 6% less than the numbers they counted. Looks like the fraudsters who planted the thousands of fake ballots got away with it.... again!
If there is "forensic proof", why is the Missoula County Elections Office disputing the findings?
Quote: The Missoula County Elections Office has pushed back strongly on the notion that there are irregularities in the vote count. Elections Administrator Bradley Seaman is confident the county would win any legal challenge. "There's a clear process that they could challenge an election result through the courts", Seaman said. "We kind of welcome that process, because that would help voters feel confident, because we know that there is no merit behind this".
You were predicting terroristic acts of violence. And the peaceful protesters got no justice. Not from Dotard, anyway. You think property destruction and looting is "imparting justice"? When are the "protests" going to start? Is there a certain level of fake evidence that Dotard "won" that will trigger magamorons to take to the streets?
What's sad is a predisent having to make up conspiracy theories like "fake news" and the "deep state" to explain low approval ratings and administration failures. Also sad is cultists believing such nonsense.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - Teddy Roosevelt
21 comments:
I very seriously doubt it. "Kenneth Mayer, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was called to testify about a study he had conducted on mail ballots cast in Montana between 2006 and 2016. Over that time period, Mayer testified, there had been 7,079,953 mail/absentee ballots cast in Montana. Of that total, he had found one instance of illegal voting, where a man filled out and submitted his former wife's ballot, without her permission, for an election for a school board. That means that 0.0000001% of all mail ballots cast in Montana over a decade were cast illegally" (link).
Was it a 100% audit? This was.
How many people have been charged?
Ballots are anonymous. The envelopes they were sent in were not. All they know is that the number of valid ballots was 6% less than the numbers they counted. Looks like the fraudsters who planted the thousands of fake ballots got away with it.... again!
...but at least now there is forensic proof of thousands of invalid votes.
If there is "forensic proof", why is the Missoula County Elections Office disputing the findings?
Quote: The Missoula County Elections Office has pushed back strongly on the notion that there are irregularities in the vote count. Elections Administrator Bradley Seaman is confident the county would win any legal challenge. "There's a clear process that they could challenge an election result through the courts", Seaman said. "We kind of welcome that process, because that would help voters feel confident, because we know that there is no merit behind this".
Correction: ALLEGED findings.
lol! The Courts had their chance. It's the mobs turn now to impart justice resulting from any findings...
Anyone who is a part of this "mob" will be subject to arrest and imprisonment. Unless they're killed by the police while committing acts of violence.
Like all those Portland rioters have been punished? LOL!
You were predicting terroristic acts of violence. And the peaceful protesters got no justice. Not from Dotard, anyway. You think property destruction and looting is "imparting justice"? When are the "protests" going to start? Is there a certain level of fake evidence that Dotard "won" that will trigger magamorons to take to the streets?
:)
LOL.
Pretty sad when the Press is literally "in the tank" for you and you still have a 42% "disapprove" rating.
What's sad is a predisent having to make up conspiracy theories like "fake news" and the "deep state" to explain low approval ratings and administration failures. Also sad is cultists believing such nonsense.
lol!
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - Teddy Roosevelt
Meanwhile...
Dotard Donald never "strove valiantly". What a load.
...as opposed to Biden... lol!
180 degrees opposed.
I guess fighting to violate the 2nd Amendment is 180 degrees opposed to what Trump did.
"I'm not going against the 2nd Amendment, but it not's absolute either..."
I guess you could it interpret it that way... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.'
Post a Comment