Order in the court
Decision to abort
The monkey wants to speak
So speak, monkey speak
Speak monkey, speak
Speak monkey, speak
Speak monkey, speak
---
Variants
“Order in the court, the monkey wants to speak, the first one to speak is a monkey for a week!”
"order in the court
the monkey wants to speak
speak monkey speak
the first one to speak
is the monkey of the week"
Order in the courthouse,
The monkey wants to speak.
No laughing, no smiling
No showing your teeth!
Silence in the gallery
Silence in the court
The biggest monkey in the world
is just about to talk!
Order in the court
The judge is eating beans.
His wife is in the bathtub (bathroom?)
sinking submarines
Silence in the Courtyard,
Silence in the street
The biggest fool in [town name]
Is just about to speak
29 comments:
Must be why all those 2020 election challenges were thrown out....
No.
Can't let the monkey's speak...
No, we want them to speak.
Sure, that's why no one has "standing" in court cases to challenge voter fraud.
Rudy Giuliani to Judge: "This Is Not a Fraud Case".
No, but this is. :)
The election is OVER. Your "sworn affidavits" are from people who are mistaken. Or possibly lying. Although I think they are probably simply mistaken. And suffering from the same delusions you are... which is making them think they saw things they did not.
Quote: ...the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.
Isn't it a crime to swear a false affidavit? When do you intend upon prosecuting all these liars?
btw - How is you "honour legal system" of selectively enforcing no laws working out for you? You're no longer bothering to prosecute Republicans if it would reveal Democrats crimes?
WHY I said they are probably simply mistaken. And I think it would be hard to prove if they were lying because they could say the affidavit was how they remembered things. Can you be prosecuted for remembering wrong/being mistaken? btw, there is no "honor system". If you commit voter fraud you are prosecuted.
Yes, you can be prosecuted for mis-remembering. lol!
btw- When they find the fake ballots that Ruby Freeman planted/ counted , is she going to jail?
No. They will never be found because they don't exist. Ruby Freeman planted no fake ballots. She will never be charged.
lol! What part of examine the ballots don't you get?
The part where any are determined to be "fake" after the "examining" takes place.
What part of the election being over and Joe Biden being declared the legitimate winner don't you get?
Oh he won all right. How he won, that's what the world will also know.
That's why he'll be the *presnit in the history books. :)
They won't because Joe Biden won by getting the most votes. Cast by individual voters (voting once each) who were all legally entitled to cast a ballot. Joe Biden WON despite "GOP" voter suppression and Dotard's directed to DeJoy to slow down the mail resulted in votes being stolen FROM BIDEN. While Dotard "won" in 2016 due to the usual voter suppression AND help from Putin. Why there will be an asterix next to the name of Donald J. tRump in the history books.
Ruby Freeman's fake ballots in Atlanta are the dead giveaway. When the truth gets announced, the newly established Green Zone around the Capitol won't save Sleepy Joe.
Michigan, Wisconsin, and Virginia violated their own Constitutions. The fraud was "calculated" and "widespread".
No.
Indeed it was...
It wasn't.
Twas.
No. GA counted it's votes 3 times. Every time the count showed Joe Biden to be the winner. Other states recounted too. "Calculated and widespread" fraud exists only in magamoron delusions. Joe Biden is the dementia-free, competent and legitimate president.
Proof that you are full of shit is you pointing to efforts by the Dotard team to "win" by tossing out valid legitimate votes using any method available to them. Like bogus signature challenges. I know someone who had their signature challenged. It was his signature. He had to go somewhere and verify it to their satisfaction. Thus defeating the purpose of a MAIL-IN ballot.
Counting the same pile of fake ballots over and over doesn't, a legitimate recount, make.
There were no piles of fake ballots to count. They counted the legally case legitimate ballots.
That's why they had to hide them until everybody else left, of course
"legally cast".
And they weren't hidden. They were told they were going home. Then the boss said, no, we're going to keep counting. So they removed the ballots from where they had stored them previously (thinking they were going home). They weren't "hidden". Rudy Giuliani knows this, having seen the whole tape. One reason (if it goes to trial) there will be a big judgement against him re the Dominion case. He knows the truth but still he lies.
Post a Comment