Thursday, September 12, 2019

Why Did the 2019 Deficit Just Hit $1 Trillion?

from Issues & Insights
The Congressional Budget Office reported on Tuesday that, with one month to go, the federal deficit for fiscal year 2019 has already topped $1 trillion. As night follows day, Trump administration critics blamed the tax cuts.

And once again, the data prove them wrong.

The CBO report says that the federal deficit reached $1.067 by the end of August. That’s up $168 billion from the comparable period in fiscal year 2018. The deficit this year will be larger than the entire budget was in 1987.

Where did the increase come from? Why, tax cuts, of course.

But the report shows that revenues climbed 3.4% so far this fiscal year – a growth rate that’s faster than GDP. Spending, however, shot up by 6.4%.

Look within the data, in fact, and you see that the tax cuts are working as promised – by accelerating economic growth, they’re at least partially paying for themselves.

Take corporate taxes. Ask any Democrat running for president and they will bemoan the tax “giveaways” to giant corporations. What they won’t tell you is that corporate tax revenues are up 5%.

In fact, corporations paid $8 billion more in the 11 months of this fiscal year than they did in the same period of fiscal year 2018. That increase alone is enough to fully fund the Environmental Protection Agency for an entire year.

What’s more, the CBO notes that corporate income tax payments through May were on 2018 activities. When you compare corporate taxes from June through August to same months last year, they are already up $18 billion – a 48% increase!

Meanwhile, individual income and payroll taxes are up $82 billion – a 3% increase over the prior year. Payroll taxes alone, which are a good indication of how well the job market is because they are automatically deducted from every worker’s wages, are up 6.4%.

Now look at the spending side of the equation.

The CBO report shows that while revenues have climbed by $102 billion, spending shot up by $271 billion.

The entire increase in the deficit over last year is due to rampant spending increases, not the Trump tax cuts.

Spending increases were across the board.

Social Security costs climbed 5.7%; Medicare, 6.5%; Medicaid, 4.6%.

Defense spending is up 7.9%, but spending on everything else in the budget has climbed by 4.5%.

Here’s the really worrisome figure: Interest payments on the national debt is up 14% over the prior year.

It should go without saying that these levels of spending growth are unsustainable. Yet instead of confronting them, lawmakers and the Trump administration are aggravating them. Entitlement reform is a non-issue at the moment. Every increase in defense spending has to be matched with a hike in spending on domestic programs. The national debt continues to explode.

And while Republicans appear indifferent to the debt explosion, Democrats are eager to more than double the size of the federal government, without saying how they’d pay for that increase let alone bring existing annual deficits down to earth.

To paraphrase Herbert Stein, something that can’t go on forever, won’t. The only question is when it won’t.

11 comments:

Dervish Z Sanders said...

It isn't just that the tax cuts NOT pay for themselves, but now we don't have that money to pay toward things we do need. Dotard said that companies getting tax cuts would pay workers more as a result. But that didn't happen (aside from some scraps). AS PREDICTED they used it to buy back stock (enriching stockholders). They did, however, goose the economy. Which was a big reason why tRump supported them.

Of course he's an oligarch whose primary concern is other rich people like himself (what he said at Mar-A-Lago... "I just made you all a lot richer"). Although the primary reason for the cuts was to make Dotard look good. Why he does not care about the debt. As per Dotard it's the next president's problem. i.e. a Democrat will have to clean up his mess - as is ALWAYS the case after a republican screws up the economy (coming tRump recession will be much worse because of his irresponsible economic policies*).

*His "economic policy" being "what makes me look good NOW".

LOL your comment on my blog that Dotard will eliminate the debt in his second term. Although I suspect you know you were lying when you wrote it. Because you believe as Dotard does - use any lie that might work for you in the moment. When proven wrong latter - just spin a new lie.

Thersites said...

Yep, illiterate. And ill-video-ite.

Dervish Z Sanders said...

This "illiterate" bullshit is pretty f*cking stupid. All it does is prove you have no idea what "illiterat" means. You should check a dictionary. Then you might decide to discontinue embarrassing yourself.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Your first sentence is refuted in the post. More money is coming in now, not less. What's up is SPENDING.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Illiterate AND innumerate!

Dervish Z Sanders said...

Federal taxes collected go up almost every year. 2009 was the last time they went down (inflation and a growing economy versus recession). The increases in 2013 to 2015 (under Obama) were all greater than the yearly increases in 2017 to 2019 (under Dotard). By the way, the 2020 increase (Dotard's last full year in office) is projected to be smaller than the increases from 2013 to 2015 (0.20 trillion projected in 2020 versus 0.32 trillion in 2013, 0.25 trillion in 2014, and 0.23 trillion in 2015 under Obama). source.

Dervish Z Sanders said...

Without Googling for an answer, I'd guess spending goes up every year as well. Due to inflation, a growing population and an aging population (baby boomers). As opposed to any increase in irresponsible expenditures.

Dervish Z Sanders said...

Those are spending increases that can NOT be avoided. Despite you implying they can be (by capitalizing "spending").

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...and avoidant.

Dervish Z Sanders said...

Huh? You think baby boomers aging (and increasing expenses related with said aging) can be avoided somehow? Or are you talking about yourself... "avoidant" of facts would be an accurate way to describe you.

Thersites said...

Afraid to touch the 3rd rail, Dervy? That's not my problem.