Every single candidate for DNC Chair just blamed their loss in 2024 on racism and misogyny pic.twitter.com/T8shvrRhUn
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 31, 2025
It's why they NEED to fabricate Hate Crimes. Without Rampant and Out of Control Racism and Misogeny, the Democratic Party has no platform or raison d'etre. White Guilt-Pride lies at the party's very foundation. Anyone on the platform who had failed to raise his hand would have been immediately excommunicated. It's a "purity test" for Party membership. It demonstrates that they're "all in" for maintaining Intersectional Identity Politics as their only way forward. And as Donald J. Trump has shown, it's also their kryptonite.
33 comments:
It's possible republican rigging means Democrats won't be able to win again. It's possible the US is now permanently a fascist White Supremacist country. That must make you very happy.
fyi, racism and misogyny did play a role in the election. Anyone on the platform who had failed to raise his hand would have been immediately "excommunicated" because Democrats believe in the truth and not your imaginary "guilt pride" or imaginary faking of hate crimes.
Rigging = ensuring eligible citizens vote only once per the Constitution.
Constitutional democracy = white supremacy
To HELL with Biden's stupid speech, to HELL with Hunter Biden, to HELL with Chuck the Schmuck Schumer to HELL with them ALL.this makes better news.
Nancy Pelosi was seen as a driving force behind the Democratic push for Biden to step aside, or to put it the way it really was, To Throw Him Under The Bus!
After Vice President Kamala Harris lost to President-elect Trump, Pelosi expressed regret that Biden hadn’t dropped out earlier.
Back in June, speculation swirled about Biden stepping down after the debate. Despite his insistence that he wouldn’t, reports suggested Democratic leaders like former President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Pelosi urged him to reconsider. They feared he wouldn’t beat Trump
Here’s the rewritten article with short, bursty sentences and the original number of paragraphs:
“It’s been on my mind a lot lately, and—” Jill Biden said. “We were friends for 50 years. It was disappointing,” she told the Post in a Wednesday piece.
Pelosi had joined “Morning Joe” in July, shortly after President Biden’s shaky debate performance. On the show, Pelosi said, “It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run,” even though Biden had repeatedly assured he would stay in the race
Here’s the rewritten article with short, bursty sentences and the original number of paragraphs:
As she prepares to leave the White House, First Lady Jill Biden shared her thoughts in an interview with The Washington Post. She opened up about her disappointment in former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who played a role in President Biden stepping out of the 2024 race.
“It’s been on my mind a lot lately, and—” Jill Biden said. “We were friends for 50 years. It was disappointing,” she told the Post in a Wednesday piece.
Pelosi had joined “Morning Joe” in July, shortly after President Biden’s shaky debate performance. On the show, Pelosi said, “It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run,” even though Biden had repeatedly assured he would stay in the race
Last week, President Biden shared a different perspective with USA Today. “Who the hell knows? So far, so good. But who knows what I’m going to be when I’m 86 years old?” he admitted.
Jill Biden also reflected on the president’s choice to pardon their son, Hunter. “Joe really wrestled with that decision,” she said. “I mean, we started— he started at the point where he said he wasn’t going to pardon Hunter. But then I think things changed. Circumstances changed, and it became quite apparent and obvious that the Republicans weren’t going to stop.
This became a Hollywood Soap Opera, and it still is as far as Jill Biden is concerned
This Is What that Moronic Progressive Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries said yesterday, ““HOUSE REPUBLICANS ARE RIPPING OFF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE”
This is a moment that requires leadership, compassion, decisiveness and decency. It’s not a moment that calls for misinformation and misdirection. House Democrats look forward to an administrative inquiry that is fact-based, thorough and comprehensive. It’s my expectation that Congress will also independently conduct hearings in both the House of Representatives and in the Senate that should be thorough, thoughtful and fact-based as well.
House Democrats are committed to driving down the high cost of living here in New York and in the United States of America. Things are too expensive. Housing costs are too high, grocery costs are too high and utility costs are too high. America is too expensive. We must build an affordable economy for hardworking taxpayers here in New York and throughout the country. That’s our commitment. At the same time, House Republicans are ripping off the American people. They are trying to steal taxpayer money from vital initiatives that serve the community. House Republicans want to end Medicaid as we know it, throw off children from Head Start, make it harder for seniors who rely on Meals on Wheels for their nutritional assistance and to cut grants that improve public safety in our community. It’s wrong. And we are determined to stop it. The federal funding freeze that was put into place this week was unlawful, unconscionable and
un-American. It was part of an effort to rip off the American people, connected to a Republican scheme to cut taxes for billionaires and wealthy corporations and force everyday Americans, working-class Americans, low-income Americans and middle-class Americans to pay for it. It’s not acceptable and we’re going to fight hard to make sure it never happens.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries., is being criticized by Republicans after pledging Democrats would fight President Donald Trump's agenda "in the streets
Yes, the House minority leader, Speaker in waiting, has advocated fighting the Trump agenda in the streets.
Look, Jeffries is acting like a Soviet. Yes, the House minority leader, their Speaker has advocated fighting the Trump agenda in the Streets.
This is what This Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, The Democrat from New York said yesterday and ., is being criticized by the Republicans for saying it after he had pledged that the Democrats WOULD FIGHT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S AGENDA "IN THE STREETS."
"Right now, we're going to keep focus on the need to look out for everyday New Yorkers and everyday Americans who are under assault by an extreme MAGA Republican agenda that is trying to cut taxes for billionaires, donors, and wealthy corporations and then stick New Yorkers and working class Americans across the country with the bill," Jeffries said.
"That's not acceptable. We are going to fight it legislatively. We are going to fight it in the courts. We're going to fight it in the streets."
Republicans blasted Jeffries for his choice of words, accusing him of inflaming political tensions in an already-tense political climate.
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, ., immediately Demanded that Jeffries Apologize.
"House Minority Leader Jeffries should promptly apologize for his use of inflammatory and extreme rhetoric," Emmer wrote on X. "President Trump and the Republicans are focused on uniting the country; Jeffries needs to stop trying to divide it."
A senior White House official reported that , "Hakeem Jeffries must apologize for this disgraceful call to violence."
'Hakeem Jeffries must apologize for this disgraceful call to violence!
Republicans blasted Jeffries for his choice of words, accusing him of inflaming political tensions in an already-tense political climate.
Are the left gearing up for Mass Riots Again .. are they just waiting for a tragedy to use as a catalyst .. whether said catalyst is someone being shot by police while resisting arrest or the mass deportations that are going to increase dramatically .. they may be waiting for an excuse to Burn ,Loot , and Murder on a mass scale again
What does “Fight in the streets” mean and why do so many Democrats use that phrase?
They are threatening US with riots Again.
Minus: Rigging = ensuring eligible citizens vote only once per the Constitution.
False. republicans ensure that as many eligible citizens as possible who are qualified to vote CANNOT vote. Or they give them a "provisional ballot", making the citizen who is qualified to vote think they voted, but then toss it later.
Minus: Constitutional democracy = white supremacy.
True, as far as you're concerned. Only White men should be allowed to vote. That's what the founders thought too. You think the provision that you need to own property should be brought back too, yes?
Massachusetts State Senator James Eldridge filed legislation that would allow non-US citizens to vote in municipal elections and even be a candidate for mayor, city or town council, school committee, board of selectman and other elected roles.
Yes . It sounds near unbelievable that any individual would show himself publicly to be that insane, or should I say Stupid! .
But I sincerely believe that many people who sound like him have become mentally ill and are dangerous
It seems to me that Massachusetts is full of Morons
Joe Biden wants to get rid of ANYONE that disagrees with him. In essence, free speech begone!
You think the provision that you need to own property should be brought back too, yes?
Wouldn't that disenfranchise poor white men? What happened to white supremacy? LOL!
Minus: Wouldn't that disenfranchise poor white men? What happened to white supremacy? LOL!
Of course. But there is also class supremacy. The more money you have the better person you are. As per Ayn Rand the poor are parasites. I don't think she excepted poor whites. There can never be enough people to hate for White Supremacists like you.
I'm not in the 'elite' class, and yet you accuse me of pursuing white supremacy against my class interest. I'm just a white-trash schmo... you know... a 'deplorable'. My father was an enlisted man, just like Washington's troops in 1786 who were disenfranchised by the Cincinnati and "property requirements" for voting. We're the enlisted men who banded together after the war and formed Tammany Hall to circumvent those property requirements and expand the franchise to the un-propertied white supremacists? That would be the whole Democratic Party then.
Who defends the 'elite class' of pols today? It's not the insurgents entering DC today. It's the establishment a-holes that you shill for and who advocate censorship, and wars of conquest like Ukraine.
Like Ayn Rand said in the video, alruism is for suckers and serfs... like you. Selfishness. THAT's the ticket!
Effective Altruism is the biggest/ most recent scam going. All those crypto-dollars for "progressive" causes... embezzled.
The Ayn Rand argument against helping others is false. Help can be provided to others that causes no harm to the helpers. Helping others can actually be of great benefit to the helpers.
You acknowledge this is the case with your willingness to pay higher prices to help American workers (re tariffs). Should you not selfishly reject this pro-tariff argument? Instead you are willing and eager to be scammed.
I don't know what crypto-dollars for progressive causes were embezzled. This definitely sounds like a delusion. Meanwhile d0n0ld is suckering dupes into giving him bigly $$$ for worthless "meme coins".
Minus: I'm not in the 'elite' class, and yet you accuse me of pursuing white supremacy against my class interest.
Of course. Because hate is more important to White Supremacists than even their own interests. As long as the people they hate are harmed, they are ok with themselves being harmed too. Does it make sense? Absolutely not. But hate is stupid and makes no sense. You can explain to me why you vote against your own self interest? Because I'm completely baffled. Utter moronity is the only explanation I can come up with. Another explanation is hate or greed. I think everyone that voted for tRump falls into one (or more) of those three categories.
Nice cartoon of Derpish, Joe!
You don't remember Sam?
Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange who was convicted of stealing billions of dollars from customers, was sentenced to 25 years in prison on Thursday, capping an extraordinary saga that upended the crypto industry and became a cautionary tale of greed and hubris
His Bay Area family literally "ran" the Effective Altruist movement.
Oh wait, he embezzled the funds to SUPPORT progressive causes... and DO GOOD! How "kitsch".
I've never harmed a single member of a minority group. I simply have not sacrificed my own interest for theirs. I'm a "Me" supremacist.
...and surrounding myself with Americans with jobs serves MY interest.
I don't need white guilt-pride and the self-hate that causes me to sacrifice myself for idiot crackers.
ZERO crypto-dollars for progressive causes were embezzled. The people who invested in FTX didn't do so with the intention of giving money to any cause. Their intention was to MAKE money, not donate it. The thief Sam Bankman-Fried stole their money, not Democrats.
FYI...
ProPublica announced that it would return the $1.6 million it received from the Bankman-Fried family foundation. Additionally, several Democratic political groups, including the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, have also committed to returning donations made by Bankman-Fried.
Democrats to Return $1 Million From Disgraced FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried.
ProPublica Returns Grant Funded by Bankman-Fried Family.
More money will be returned to compensate victims. The Democratic Party did not work hand-in-hand with Sam Bankman-Fried to embezzle money from anyone. Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted of wrongdoing. No organization he gave money to was convicted of any wrongdoing. They are cooperating and more of that money will be recovered and returned to victims. They aren't co-conspirators that were in on the embezzling. If they were I'd be in favor of prosecuting them as well.
btw, his donations represent approximately 0.4% of the stolen funds. 40 million out of 10 billion. He wasn't running a scheme to steal money from investors to give to Democratic causes. Most of the stolen money went to the thief, Sam Bankman-Fried and not Democratic organizations (which are returning the money he gave them).
Minus: I've never harmed a single member of a minority group.
False. You voted for d0n0ld. In doing so, you contributed to the harm he will inflict on many people, including those in minority groups. He immediately went after trans people and "DEI hires". Many qualified people will lose their jobs as a result.
What he does with power is on him. :)
...and treating people 'equally' isn't "harm". It's "justice" (not fake 'social justice')
Hey Dervy, quit boofing and snorting the Biden crack sloppy seconds while you have a chance to redeem yourself, cracker trash boi.
Minus: What he does with power is on him. :)
Also on you. Given that you voted for him. I didn't vote for fascism. I voted to keep democracy.
Minus: ...and treating people 'equally' isn't "harm". It's "justice" (not fake 'social justice').
Who said treating people equally is a harm? And harm to who? White people? That seems to be what you think. I'm strongly opposed to that kind of thinking.
The kind that conspired in the Party during the primary to knock Bernie out, or the kind that threw out the Romanian election, or the kind that appointed kamala to run for President? Which of those did you vote for?
Affirming people based upon their race is a harm.
The fight for Democracy is no longer about democracy. It's about "continuity of government"... in this case the Establishment USIC supported government, not the elected government of DJT. That "helicopter crash" in DC? THAT was a "continuity of government" exercise. This is all fallout from 9/11 and the "Patriot Act". MAGA (Tea Party) are the enemy of democracy (per USIC).
Minus: Affirming people based upon their race is a harm.
Which is what you support. Affirm people based on their being White.
Post a Comment