Previously you posted about how Tommy Robinson was protesting outside a TRIAL of muslim men accused of grooming young girls. How could they have been on trial if (as you say) Keir is only interested in prosecuting White crimes? I g00gled "grooming gangs england tommy robinson" and found this article that says, "The men, all of South Asian descent, groomed at least two vulnerable white teenage girls in Rochdale, near Manchester in northwest England, and then repeatedly raped them over a five-year period starting in 2001". The article says 7 men received sentences totally 450 years. Do you think Keir Starmer is angry and demanding reforms so this won't happen again? In your delusions, I mean.
btw, I should note that grooming girls is FINE with you if the groomers are rich and White. After reading your post and comments, my impression was that it was the men who were groomed by the girls to get what they wanted by willingly offer sex for favors to further their modeling careers. And it was my impression that you thought pursuing these crimes (committed by rich White men) was ridiculous. Because it was just hypergamy in action and that's just the way the world works.
Given this, what is your problem with grooming gangs in England? Poor minority men have no right to try to get sex from underage girls, while (for rich White men) it's a right? Because that does seem to be what you've been arguing. Very strongly, in fact.
1 comment:
Previously you posted about how Tommy Robinson was protesting outside a TRIAL of muslim men accused of grooming young girls. How could they have been on trial if (as you say) Keir is only interested in prosecuting White crimes? I g00gled "grooming gangs england tommy robinson" and found this article that says, "The men, all of South Asian descent, groomed at least two vulnerable white teenage girls in Rochdale, near Manchester in northwest England, and then repeatedly raped them over a five-year period starting in 2001". The article says 7 men received sentences totally 450 years. Do you think Keir Starmer is angry and demanding reforms so this won't happen again? In your delusions, I mean.
btw, I should note that grooming girls is FINE with you if the groomers are rich and White. After reading your post and comments, my impression was that it was the men who were groomed by the girls to get what they wanted by willingly offer sex for favors to further their modeling careers. And it was my impression that you thought pursuing these crimes (committed by rich White men) was ridiculous. Because it was just hypergamy in action and that's just the way the world works.
Given this, what is your problem with grooming gangs in England? Poor minority men have no right to try to get sex from underage girls, while (for rich White men) it's a right? Because that does seem to be what you've been arguing. Very strongly, in fact.
Post a Comment