On the Trans-Furry Community...

12.2% of the Furry Community Identifies as Transgender

 

Where Affirmation of One's Curated Self-Identity Profile Reigns Supreme!

Eureka!  Performative Gender Euphoria!

from Google AI:

In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the ego is the self that experiences reality, while the superego is a cruel, imperative voice commanding enjoyment, or jouissance—a painful pleasure beyond simple joy. Unlike Freudian ethics, Lacan's superego doesn't just forbid but actively compels the subject to enjoy, creating a twisted sense of guilt from which no enjoyment is ultimately derived, as any attempted fulfillment of the command leads to more pain and an impossible pursuit of unattainable pleasure...

...unattainable before the furry costume, attainable after donning the furry suit. The ego retires, and the furry persona can be unleashed.  The personae's now ego-suspended disbelief achieved.

Gender Identity Disorder (GID: aka - Gender Dysphoria) is related to Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).

The difference from Google AI:  Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly multiple personality disorder, involves distinct identities that take control of a person's behavior, accompanied by amnesia, while Gender Dysphoria (GD) is the distress a person experiences from the incongruence between their internal sense of gender and their sex assigned at birth. A key difference is that DID is a global identity disturbance with involuntary shifts and amnesia, whereas GD is a specific distress related to gender identity and often leads to a desire for medical transition. It's important to note that GD is not a personality disorder, though some people with DID may also experience or present with symptoms of GD.

GD can be the pleasure (surplus jouissance) of an actor playing a role as opposed to a schizophrenic fracturing of the Ego   It's a function of how deep the rabbit hole one goes:

From Google AI: 

Schizophrenia

• Characterized by positive (e.g., hallucinations, delusions), negative (e.g., flat affect, withdrawal), and cognitive (e.g., disorganized thinking) symptoms.
• Typically develops in late adolescence or early adulthood.
• Delusions are often bizarre and persecutory, while hallucinations can be auditory, visual, or other sensory experiences.
• Treatment involves antipsychotic medications, therapy, and psychosocial interventions.

Dissociative Identity Disorder

• Characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or personality states that alternate and take control of the individual's behavior.
• Often arises from severe childhood trauma or abuse.
• Individuals may experience amnesia, depersonalization, and a sense of detachment from their own body and emotions.
• Treatment involves therapy, such as trauma-focused therapy, to integrate the different identities and develop coping mechanisms

Co-occurrence

It's important to note that schizophrenia and DID can sometimes co-occur in the same individual. This is known as "schizoaffective disorder."

Conclusion

Schizophrenia and dissociative identity disorder are distinct mental health conditions with different symptoms, origins, and treatments. It's crucial to seek professional help if you or someone you know is experiencing symptoms of either condition.

Don't Fall for it Again, America!

"In God We Trust"

...Government?  Not so much...

Josephine, or The Mouse Folk

"Our intelligence cannot wall itself up alive, like a pupa in a chrysalis. It must at any cost keep on speaking terms with the universe that engendered it"

- William James

Not all are Falling for the PMC Wage Slave 'Surplus Salary' Trap?

EU, et al, Squeel "Muh, Russia" in Moldova ahead of Parliamentary Elections on 9/28

Tech will Save Us!

The Woke Guilt-Pride Saga Continues.... Do White Lives Matter (even if they're AfD)?

...they don't in the UK.

The Guilt-Pride Re-Branding... of Nazi's and Democrats

Rehabilitating Guilt and Restoring Pride

“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”

–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"

Serfdom enters the Digital Age...

The UnConstitutional J6 Surveillance - FBI Parallel Construction Run Amok!

🚨 BREAKING: Special Counsel Ed Martin has dropped a bombshell, announcing a full-scale investigation into the actions of the January 6th Committee for the deliberate destruction and tampering of evidence and the issuance of illegitimate pardons signed by an autopen. pic.twitter.com/qPWEJwb2UF

— TRUMP ARMY (@TRUMP_ARMY_) September 8, 2025

Sundance, "Full Spectrum Surveillance Lies Behind the J6 Committee Motive to Delete all Investigative Material"

There’s a reason why the J6 Committee deleted the records of their activity, an angle missed by most. When you understand what they hid and why they did it, you then understand why current Speaker of The House Mike Johnson will not go near the subject.

The J6 Committee used interfaces with the NSA database and pre-existing portals with aligned DHS Social Media databases (including Twitter, see prior “Twitter Files”), as research and evidence gathering mechanisms for their investigations.

The J6 targets were identified through a collaboration between the legislative research group and the FBI. [That’s unlawful by the way – but that’s another matter]. The FBI contracted Palantir to identify the targets using facial recognition software and private sector databases.

Once identified, the targets were then searched in the NSA database for a fulsome context of identity. All subsequent electronic metadata of the targets was retrieved and utilized in prosecution; however, no one ever discovered this was the collaborative method. That has not come out yet.

Ultimately, the J6 Committee hiding and deleting their files and operational techniques was due to several issues. They really didn’t have a choice given the unknowns of an incoming republican majority.

First, the collaboration with the FBI is unconstitutional. Legislative officers are not law enforcement officers. There is a separation of powers issue.

Second, ultimately – and most consequentially – all of the participants did not want the American public aware of the mass surveillance techniques that were carried out as part of the ’round up.’

Wait to see what the next NSA compliance audit looks like. Remember, these reports are more than a year behind the activity they highlight.

This is where a complete mental reset is needed.

The modern application of the fifty-year-old concept around FISA as a constitutional mechanism to search the private papers (data) of American citizens, is a fraud, a complete ruse.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA, represents the method used by the intelligence apparatus of the FBI to conduct surveillance. It was purposefully designed, as a method to avoid the problems with 4th amendment protections. However, the modern application of the FISA justification has no lawful basis.

♦CONTEXT – Beginning in/around 2012, after the Dept of Justice National Security Division was created by President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, the use of FISA warrants were extended to include electronic searches of captured information held within the National Security Agency (NSA). This was the database into which former NSA employee Edward Snowden was creating the search engine software.

The capturing of information was relatively new; technology was still being developed. Rapid scale-ups of archives and data processing was underway. Various iterations of the search tools and processes were being tested and deployed.

Prior to 2010/2012 we were mostly talking about emails, phone calls and text messages. However, as more and more technology was deployed, the interfaces expanded. Today, almost every electronic interface is captured/stored within either the NSA database, or a private sector database with connections to the NSA search portals.

Arguably, all of the underlying data captures were unconstitutional, and when the captures were originally discovered there was some intense conversations about fourth amendment protections and Americans privacy. To set aside the concerns and justify the existence of electronic search measures, the American government justified existence via the FISA court process, which extended to cover the new capabilities.

Currently, almost every American interfaces electronically with some system that captures their data. In the private sector that data is then assembled, attributed and used for consumer product micro-targeting, i.e., all data is commercially monetized.

Local and state governments also interface with the federal government database. As a consequence, all data eventually flows to the NSA capture points where searches of the total assembly are possible.

As noted in various explanations of government collaboration with social media, DHS has access to the various databases which house information inside the private sector. The lines between govt and private sector data captures are nonexistent as both public information and private information databases can be searched through the same network.

This is the baseline to understand the scope of data collection.

The important part to understand is all of the data collected is searchable. Then you move on to ‘how’ can the data be searched.

The ‘how’ is where FISA comes into the picture as the justifiable mechanism that permits the federal government to search the database.

The existence of the database is no longer argued. The govt has now moved beyond justifying the existence of the stored data, and now the only point of contention is ‘how’ and ‘when’ the government may exploit it.

This is where the DOJ-NSD, FBI, U.S. Intelligence Community, Congress and even the Judicial Branch claim the FISA laws protect the unlawful exploitation of the search capability. However, did you know there is not a single example of a FISA search application to the FISA Court that has ever passed Inspector General review.

Prior to President Trump’s authorization of the OIG in 2017, no one was ever permitted to review, check or audit the government submissions to the FISA Court. From the moment the DOJ National Security Division was created to permit the enhanced search review, not a single oversight mechanism was ever in place.

Factually, in the timeline of FISA use not a single oversight mechanism was ever in place. The entire process, and think of searching the database as a process, was/is based on the ‘honor system’. That explains why it was so easy to weaponize by Obama/Holder.

As soon as President Trump permitted the Office of Inspector General to start looking at filled out FISA applications, and justified FISA search documents created by users who were searching through the database, what they discovered was a non-existent accountability system.

After the DOJ Office of Inspector General (OIG), Michael Horowitz, presented his December 2019 findings of the FISA application used against U.S person Carter Page, the gross deficiencies and intentional fraud were so extensive the IG said he was going to review a sample of FISA applications to identify if the fraud and abuse was widespread.

The OIG began reviewing FISA applications from eight field offices (the proverbial “rank and file”). The OIG selected 29 FISA applications from those field offices over the period of October 2014 to September 2019.

Additionally, every field office and the DOJ-NSD generate internal “Accuracy Reviews”, or self-checks on FISA applications; so, the OIG inspected 42 of the accuracy review FISA files to determine if they were compliant.

The results were so bad the IG produced an interim memorandum to the DOJ and FBI [pdf link here]. Within the 17-page-memo the IG notified Attorney General Bill Barr and FBI Director Chris Wray that all of the claimed FISA processes, in every field office, are grossly deficient, and in most cases, there is zero compliance with FISA standards.

The IG memorandum was presented before the Inspector General even looked at the specifics of the non-compliance.

Below is the report/memorandum. Additionally, I am summarizing the stunning top-lines identified by the IG memo:

• The IG reviewed 29 FISA applications, surveillance warrants, used against U.S. persons.
• The 29 FISA applications were from eight different field offices.
• The FISA applications were from Oct/2014 through Sept/2019.
• All of the FISA applications reviewed were approved by the FISA court.

The ‘Woods File’ is the mandatory FBI evidence file that contains the documentary proof to verify all statements against U.S. persons that are contained in the FISA application. Remember, this is a secret court, the FISA applications result in secret Title-1 surveillance and wiretaps against U.S. persons outside the fourth amendment.

♦ Within the 29 FISA applications reviewed, four were completely missing the Woods File. Meaning there was zero supportive evidence for any of the FBI claims against U.S. persons underpinning the FISA application. [ie. The FBI just made stuff up]

♦ Of the remaining 25 FISA applications, 100% of them, all of them, were materially deficient on the woods file requirement; and the average number of deficiencies per file was 20. Meaning an average of twenty direct statements against the target, supporting the purpose of the FISA application, sworn by the FBI affiant, were unsubstantiated. [The low was 5, the high was 63, the average per file was 20]

♦ Half of the FISA applications reviewed used Confidential Human Sources (CHS’s). The memo outlines that “many” of applications containing CHS claims had no supportive documentation attesting to the dependability of the CHS.

♦ Two of the 25 FISA applications reviewed had renewals; meaning the FISA applications were renewed to extended surveillance, wiretaps, etc. beyond the initial 90-days. None of the renewals had any re-verification. Both FISAs that used renewals were not compliant.

Keep in mind, all of these applications/justifications to engage title-1 surveillance against suspects, were approved by the FISA court. How is this possible, unless the FISA Court is intentionally just a false front for a nonexistent process.

That’s my position now. There is no FISA process in place at all. It’s as if there’s a traffic light at an intersection, but the power is turned off. What good is the traffic light, other than to say there’s a traffic light at this intersection.

But wait… it gets worse.

The DOJ and FBI have an internal self-check mechanism. The DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) chief counsel, and the chief counsel for every FBI field office are required to conduct an “Accuracy Review” of selected FISA applications.

One review per FBI field office (25 to 30 field offices), which are also sent to DOJ-NSD (main justice) for general counsel inspection.

Keep in mind, these “accuracy reviews” are known in advance, so the FBI has all the time in the world to select the best FISA file for review.

Additionally, I surmise the OIG wanted to inspect the “accuracy review” FISA’s because they would show the best light on the overall system itself. The OIG was looking for the best, most compliant, product to report on.

However, when the OIG inspected 42 of these Accuracy Reviews, the IG identified that only three of them had accurately assembled documents (Woods File) supporting the application. The error rate within the files self-checked was over 93%.

So the best FBI files are selected to undergo the FBI and DOJ-NSD accuracy review. The accuracy review takes place by FBI legal counsel and DOJ-NSD legal counsel. However, the IG finds that only three FBI applications in the accuracy reviews were compliant.

The error rate in the files undertaken by the internal accuracy review was over 93% (3 compliant out of 42 reviewed). These were the FISA submissions with the greatest possibility of being accurate.

This is the baseline to understand what comes next.

Summary: The justification of FISA or FISA (702) as a mechanism to protect the American people from illegal searches of the NSA database IS A FRAUD. The searching of the NSA database not only continues but has factually expanded through today. There are no established limits on search use, only false claims that are fed to the public for popular consumption.

The DOJ and FBI are aware of this. The OIG is aware of this. The Intelligence Community is aware of this. The NSA is aware of this. The FISA Court is aware of this. The Supreme Court, which oversees the FISA Court, is aware of this. The Legislative Branch is aware of this.

We have the evidence and receipts.

More soon…

But hey, the J6 Conspirators were "terrorists" dontcha know?  Cosplay demonstrations by the American people after a Fedsurrection purposely instigated to cover up a Parliamentary Coup and debate over slates of State Electors is "terrorizing" to a Deep State intent on maintaining "continuity of Government (aka - UniParty in Charge).  They needed the resources of the entire National Security State to make their unconstitutional legal cases through parallel construction and keep themselves safe from having their "authority" questioned afterwards.

The J6 Committee "Police"

Woodsterman Wisdoms...

Rick Davies, R.I.P.

America's Progressive Elites will find No Sanctuary in Europe

...or the USA.

Today's Loyalist is Tomorrow's Terrorist

Let Palantir's MOSAD derived Pre-Crime algorithms decide.

Democrats: The Verba non Acta Party Par Excellence!

There are no longer any Criminal "Offenders" in Illinois, merely "Justice Impacted Individuals"

Another Social Justice 'Problem' SOLVED!  Euphemisms to the Rescue! Now they just need more Misunderstood Political Identities to Rehabilitate.  Cuz that's what Wokism is. Rehabilitating Negatives into Positives.  It's simply a matter of how you think about it.  Thanks Moriarity!  Woke Trauma Culture Therapeutics for the Masses 101!  Another Guilt-Pride Spirit Profilicity Inversion/ White-washing Success Story.  Sincerity or Authenticity NOT required!  The Picture is Completely constructed AND held together by its' New Social FRAMING.

CAUTION: Democrats at Work... Caveat Emptor!

RFK Jr, Not Big Agra or Big Pharma, Is a Threat to Your Health!

Cui Bono from this messaging?

There are $trillions$ at stake.

Year of the Locusts

Joel 2:25-27

25 “I will repay you for the years the locusts have eaten—

    the great locust and the young locust,

    the other locusts and the locust swarm[b]—

my great army that I sent among you. 

26 You will have plenty to eat, until you are full,

    and you will praise the name of the Lord your God,

    who has worked wonders for you;

never again will my people be shamed. 

27 Then you will know that I am in Israel,

    that I am the Lord your God,

    and that there is no other;

never again will my people be shamed.

A Tribute to the Democratic Party... w/ a Special THANKS to all her Donors!

...as Late Capitalism breaks into the Dawn of Technofeudalism!

Sympathy for the Devils...

How war affects markets and what investors can learn from history

A few years ago, I sat across from a client who had just read the morning headlines, which announced Russia had just invaded Ukraine. A whole series of scenarios loomed large, making markets jittery.

Unsurprisingly, this client was worried and considering withdrawing his investments – ‘just until things settle down’.

It’s a conversation I’ve had many times with clients over the years. And it always comes from a place of uncertainty, sometimes even fear. Fear of the unknown. Fear of loss. Fear of doing nothing. Fear that this time things will not recover and that all might be lost.

But history has shown us time and again that sometimes the best thing to do is nothing. Not to cave in to our desire to take our chips off the table. The data shows that, if anything, these are the times we should consider adding to investments. And so the client chose wisely. He did nothing and stayed invested. He continued to trust us to navigate the uncertainty.

Markets hate uncertainty, not war

When war looms, markets often stumble. It’s not necessarily the conflict itself that causes the panic, it’s the uncertainty. Investors don’t know what’s coming next, how the political cards will fall, so they react.

But once the fog begins to lift, history shows us that markets recover. Often faster than you’d expect.

Take World War II. When Hitler invaded Poland in 1939, the world held its breath. But the US stock market climbed 10%. After Pearl Harbour, it dipped briefly – just 2.9% – and bounced back within a month. By the end of the war, the Dow Jones had risen by 50%.

That’s not a fluke. It’s a pattern.

The power of perspective

Most people aren’t aware of this pattern, so when in the middle of the storm and news outlets are reporting the worst, they find it hard to imagine the sun coming out again. Consider these events and the performance of the Dow Jones one year after the event:

History gives us perspective. It reminds us that markets are resilient. That investors who stay the course and resist the urge to react, often come out stronger and wealthier.

Across six major conflicts, from World War II to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, US large-cap and small-cap stocks have not only recovered, but often outperformed their peacetime averages. During World War II, small-cap stocks surged by over 30%. Even during the Korean War, markets delivered double-digit returns.

Why? Because once the initial shock wears off, markets begin to price in the new reality. Governments often increase spending, particularly in defense and infrastructure, which can stimulate economic activity. Certain sectors, like energy, defence, and manufacturing, may even benefit directly.

What should you do when the world feels unstable?

When the world feels uncertain, it’s tempting to do something quickly with your investments. But often, the best move is to pause, take a breath, and remember a few key principles:

• Don’t panic. Sharp volatility is a normal part of investing. We expect it. Making big financial decisions in the heat of the moment rarely ends well.
• Stick with your plan. Trying to jump in and out of the market based on feelings or headlines can seriously impact your long-term returns.
• Spread your risk. A well-diversified portfolio is like a shock absorber. It won’t eliminate bumps in the road, but it makes permanent loss of capital highly unlikely.
• Look at the bigger picture. Markets have always had ups and downs. But over time, they’ve rewarded patience and discipline. Don’t let short-term noise drown out your long-term goals.

A final thought

In this case, our client didn’t pull out. He stayed invested. And when we spoke to him a year later, he was relieved to have made that decision. Not only did the market rebound, but he was also rewarded with a sense of confidence that he shouldn’t be influenced by outside noise.

The world will always have its moments of chaos. Markets will rise and fall. Headlines will come and go. But an investment strategy should be built to weather storms, not just the sunny days.

The English Raise "Skewed" Confederate Flag... and Other Symbolic Adventures

The "heart flag" virtue-signal idea...a ridiculous PMC Oedipal Guilt-Pride move to mollify Multi-Culti intolerance, IMO.  Save the guilt-pride virtue signaling for history books.  You can't substitute heart stickers for real national caritas and trust.  You have to Acta non Verba build that.

Let the Howling of the Trauma Cults Begin!

Young Patriots - Stripped of their Banner become Redneck Revolt... Southern Cracker Culture Re-Unification and Solidarity Achieved!

Andrei Tarkovsky

“We can express our feelings regarding the world around us either by poetic or by descriptive means... I prefer to express myself metaphorically. Let me stress: metaphorically, not symbolically. A symbol contains within itself a definite meaning, certain intellectual formula, while metaphor is an image. An image possessing the same distinguishing features as the world it represents. An image — as opposed to a symbol — is indefinite in meaning. One cannot speak of the infinite world by applying tools that are definite and finite. We can analyse the formula that constitutes a symbol, while metaphor is a being-within-itself, it’s a monomial. It falls apart at any attempt of touching it."

Race or Culture Essentialism?

From Google:

The swastika is an ancient symbol with original meanings of well-being, good fortune, and prosperity in various cultures, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, and was also used in early European traditions before being adopted and transformed into a symbol of hate by the Nazi Party in the 1920s. The word itself comes from the Sanskrit "svastika," meaning "conducive to well-being".

Is Symbolic Re-Appropriation Still Possible?

To restore "National Essentialism" to a Multi-cult Society?

Offensive?  Or Funny?

How about if he added a 'heart' tattoo to virtue-signal that he isn't a "Cracker h8er"... @@

You can never placate the perpetually offended.  So don't bother trying.  Tribes don't trump the collective.  Find a better, less divisive way to virtue-signal your tribal (or individual) grievances, Achilles.  Try a ribbon next time.  Or can't millionaires afford an NFL fine or ten?

from Google AI:

The etymology of the name Achilles (Ancient Greek: Ἀχιλλεύς, Akhilleús) is uncertain, though it is widely believed to be a combination of the Greek words ἄχος (achos), meaning "pain" or "grief," and λαός (laós), meaning "people" or "soldiers". This compound would create a meaning such as "pain of the people" or "he who brings distress to the enemy", although it is also suggested that it could be a Pre-Greek loanword or derived from the name of the Achelous River.

Cuz your fellow citizens aren't "the enemy".  So stop insulting them as if they were!

If the national flag offends you, best look inside and ask, "why am I here"?  And if the answer doesn't satisfy you, it's on you to leave, not everyone else to accommodate your sensitivities and already overly-inflated sense of self-esteem.  Because Society doesn't bow to its Discontents, its' on its' Discontents to conform, work within its rules (written and unwritten) to change it, or barring that, leave for another.

"The Rot Runs Deep!"

Left vs Right Populism

The Elites are Ripping You Off vs. They're Looking Down on You

How do you Fix this?  PMCs to the Rescue! It's all in the Messaging.

"Build Rhetorical Bridges (Climate Change/ Abortion/ Guns) from the Elite values to the Blue Collar Values"...

...cuz the Underlying Elite (Blue Collar Income Destroying) Luxury Values and Policies are Fine... it's merely a "Messaging" problem...  @@

Gee, they still kinda sound like they're looking down on me.  :(

Sino Power Analytics

Respect Muh Democracy!

The Neoliberal Open Society Guilt-Pride Driven Political War on Normies

You White People are all Racist Colonizers!

I interviewed a number of the first monkeypox (mpox) cases in 2022. They were largely affluent gay men who enjoyed traveling around the world and going to sex parties. I am not certain how stigma is connected to such a pastime.

During the outbreak, the CDC downplayed how… https://t.co/DPuyhYN3LX

— Benjamin Ryan (@benryanwriter) August 31, 2025

Just Normalize the Gay Away!

..While We're Sprinting towards Trans-humanism to get away from you!

Muh... Progress!

Unabashed Left Populism: What are its' Chances?

Woke Anti-White Neo-Racist Guilt-Pride Front & Center!

Just How Big do PMC Liberals think the "Establishing Trust thru Personal Suffering Community" is, anyways?

Zizek on Liberal Fascism

'Fascist Libertarianism"

Stolen Memes from the Woodsterman Collection

 

Slavoj Zizek on the NeoRacism of White Guilt-Pride afflicted Liberals

Communism is a Struggle for Social Universality...

...and Liberal NeoRacism is the psychological obstacle that Prevents their Achieving It.  The struggle for maintaining the existing particular identities (race/ sex/ religion/ etc.) prevents the unification of those identities into Social Classes, into a class struggle that allows workers to bring their collective ability to withhold their labour to counter Capitalist attempts to exploit and commodify it.  Identity guilt-pride spirit builds and stands in the breach, transforming "guilt" into "pride" and granting a feeling of Superiority (moral) for the existing Self-Identification categories (race/ sex/ religion/ etc.).

Have a Happy Labour Day!