The Republican Party is too willing to “forgive and forget.” Time and again, when their institutions or leaders are assaulted, they choose polite waver their finger, and say No, No, No, don’t every do that again! Which has proved to be meanibgless. . That passivity sets the stage for perpetual escalation by the Radical Democrats of today!.
By normalizing the weaponization of federal institutions, we are creating perverse incentives that could lead to future abuse. If Ole Merrick Garland got away with this, anyone in power can use the DOJ, the FBI, or other agencies as blunt tools of political warfare. We must hold Merrick Garland accountable for collusion and abuse of power. The progressive-communist Democrats claim they’re “saving democracy,” but they have shown time and again they’re willing to destroy it to save it The Republical’s inaction is tantamount to surrender, and forgive and forget. They need to get tougher .
So lets face it, we will have a radical Islamic Communist running against a serial sexual harasser whose mishandling of COVID led to the deaths of thousands of people
Says who? There isn't a blog indicated for the first graph. You didn't say. You left that information off.
And why would anyone care to send bots to your rinky-dink blog that hardly anyone comments on?
My rinky-dink blog graphs show no such amount of traffic. I don't trust those graphs at all. I got comments from you and Les on my last post, yet my stats show 1 view for my blog in the last 30 days. So that is confirmed BS. It should be at least 2, plus another view for each time you returned and commented again.
Yes, there is evidence that pro-Trump engagement bots exist and are used to simulate support online -- but whether they target small blogs is debatable. Most bot campaigns focus on high-visibility platforms like X (formerly Twitter), not low-traffic Blogger sites. So your skepticism is well-founded.
🧠 What We Know About Pro-Trump Engagement Bots...
Recent investigations confirm that AI-powered bot networks have been deployed to:
Amplify pro-Trump narratives on social media.
Flood comment sections with supportive rhetoric.
Create the illusion of widespread grassroots support.
For example:
A Clemson University study found bots using ChatGPT-style models to auto-reply with pro-GOP propaganda on X.
Another report showed bots praising Trump while ridiculing his rivals, creating a distorted sense of popularity.
These bots often pose as real users, comment on trending news, and mimic engagement patterns.
🤔 Would They Target Blogger?
Unlikely. Here’s why:
Bot campaigns prioritize reach -- they target platforms with millions of users, not niche blogs.
Blogger lacks influence metrics -- there’s no algorithmic boost from fake engagement.
Low ROI -- sending bots to small blogs doesn’t meaningfully shift public perception or search rankings.
So while your fellow blogger may be seeing automated comments, it’s more plausible that:
He’s misinterpreting anonymous human commenters.
His blog is being scraped or pinged by generic bots, not politically targeted ones.
Or he’s experiencing confirmation bias, interpreting any pro-Trump comment as part of a conspiracy.
People that comment on Lisa's blog? Looks like it.
btw, I just checked Lisa's blog and see she has a new post. She last said she was "tired of the hate" in on September. It seems she is now hungering for more hate. Missing it desperately while she was taking a break. She posted the meme that DTJ posted to social media about a "Paul Pelosi Halloween costume" being a pair of white men's briefs and a hammer. Celebrating and laughing about a brutal attack on an elderly man by a trump-supporting maniac definitely qualifies as hate.
Structure: Multi-paragraph, with varied sentence length and punctuation. Some typos (“meanibgless”, “don’t every do that again”, “Republical’s”) suggest human error rather than bot precision.
Tone: Passionate, partisan, and rhetorical -- common in political comment sections.
Content: References specific figures (Merrick Garland), institutions (DOJ, FBI), and ideological framing (“progressive-communist Democrats”). This is typical of real political discourse, not generic bot spam.
Victor’s Comment...
Structure: Short, punchy, provocative.
Tone: Hyperbolic and inflammatory -- “radical Islamic Communist” is a rhetorical fusion, not a coherent ideology.
Content: Combines accusations with dramatic framing. While bots can mimic this, the phrasing feels crafted for impact, not generated from a template.
🔍 Bot vs Human Indicators...
Typos and grammar quirks: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Specific political references: Bot-Like?✅ Human-Like?✅
Emotional tone and rhetorical flair: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Repetition or templated phrasing: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Engagement with current events: Bot-Like?✅ Human-Like?✅
These comments lean human, possibly from ideologically motivated commenters who post similar content across blogs. That doesn’t make them bots -- it makes them ritual participants, repeating glyphs of allegiance wherever they find a scroll.
Minus: If you have a better explanation, have at it.
Blogger stats are complete BS.
You left several comments on my last post. Les commented. Each visit and comment should be a hit, yet my bl0gger stats say there was ONE visit to my bl0g. If you have a better explanation than the stats are bullplop, you can have at it.
14 comments:
🥫🤺🎩🔩
Two blogs... same chunk of time.
The Boogie Woogie Bot Shuffle
The Republican Party is too willing to “forgive and forget.” Time and again, when their institutions or leaders are assaulted, they choose polite waver their finger, and say No, No, No, don’t every do that again! Which has proved to be meanibgless. . That passivity sets the stage for perpetual escalation by the Radical Democrats of today!.
By normalizing the weaponization of federal institutions, we are creating perverse incentives that could lead to future abuse. If Ole Merrick Garland got away with this, anyone in power can use the DOJ, the FBI, or other agencies as blunt tools of political warfare. We must hold Merrick Garland accountable for collusion and abuse of power. The progressive-communist Democrats claim they’re “saving democracy,” but they have shown time and again they’re willing to destroy it to save it
The Republical’s inaction is tantamount to surrender, and forgive and forget. They need to get tougher .
So lets face it, we will have a radical Islamic Communist running against a serial sexual harasser whose mishandling of COVID led to the deaths of thousands of people
They've Arrived!
Says who? There isn't a blog indicated for the first graph. You didn't say. You left that information off.
And why would anyone care to send bots to your rinky-dink blog that hardly anyone comments on?
My rinky-dink blog graphs show no such amount of traffic. I don't trust those graphs at all. I got comments from you and Les on my last post, yet my stats show 1 view for my blog in the last 30 days. So that is confirmed BS. It should be at least 2, plus another view for each time you returned and commented again.
Blogger stats = 🐂💩
Via Copilot...
Yes, there is evidence that pro-Trump engagement bots exist and are used to simulate support online -- but whether they target small blogs is debatable. Most bot campaigns focus on high-visibility platforms like X (formerly Twitter), not low-traffic Blogger sites. So your skepticism is well-founded.
🧠 What We Know About Pro-Trump Engagement Bots...
Recent investigations confirm that AI-powered bot networks have been deployed to:
Amplify pro-Trump narratives on social media.
Flood comment sections with supportive rhetoric.
Create the illusion of widespread grassroots support.
For example:
A Clemson University study found bots using ChatGPT-style models to auto-reply with pro-GOP propaganda on X.
Another report showed bots praising Trump while ridiculing his rivals, creating a distorted sense of popularity.
These bots often pose as real users, comment on trending news, and mimic engagement patterns.
🤔 Would They Target Blogger?
Unlikely. Here’s why:
Bot campaigns prioritize reach -- they target platforms with millions of users, not niche blogs.
Blogger lacks influence metrics -- there’s no algorithmic boost from fake engagement.
Low ROI -- sending bots to small blogs doesn’t meaningfully shift public perception or search rankings.
So while your fellow blogger may be seeing automated comments, it’s more plausible that:
He’s misinterpreting anonymous human commenters.
His blog is being scraped or pinged by generic bots, not politically targeted ones.
Or he’s experiencing confirmation bias, interpreting any pro-Trump comment as part of a conspiracy.
[end]
People that comment on Lisa's blog? Looks like it.
btw, I just checked Lisa's blog and see she has a new post. She last said she was "tired of the hate" in on September. It seems she is now hungering for more hate. Missing it desperately while she was taking a break. She posted the meme that DTJ posted to social media about a "Paul Pelosi Halloween costume" being a pair of white men's briefs and a hammer. Celebrating and laughing about a brutal attack on an elderly man by a trump-supporting maniac definitely qualifies as hate.
Via Copilot...
🧠 Comment Analysis...
Steve’s Comment.
Structure: Multi-paragraph, with varied sentence length and punctuation. Some typos (“meanibgless”, “don’t every do that again”, “Republical’s”) suggest human error rather than bot precision.
Tone: Passionate, partisan, and rhetorical -- common in political comment sections.
Content: References specific figures (Merrick Garland), institutions (DOJ, FBI), and ideological framing (“progressive-communist Democrats”). This is typical of real political discourse, not generic bot spam.
Victor’s Comment...
Structure: Short, punchy, provocative.
Tone: Hyperbolic and inflammatory -- “radical Islamic Communist” is a rhetorical fusion, not a coherent ideology.
Content: Combines accusations with dramatic framing. While bots can mimic this, the phrasing feels crafted for impact, not generated from a template.
🔍 Bot vs Human Indicators...
Typos and grammar quirks: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Specific political references: Bot-Like?✅ Human-Like?✅
Emotional tone and rhetorical flair: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Repetition or templated phrasing: Bot-Like?❌ Human-Like?✅
Engagement with current events: Bot-Like?✅ Human-Like?✅
These comments lean human, possibly from ideologically motivated commenters who post similar content across blogs. That doesn’t make them bots -- it makes them ritual participants, repeating glyphs of allegiance wherever they find a scroll.
[end]
The 1st graph was Farmers Letters... I'll update them w/ current stats now.
If you have a better explanation, have at it.
The traffic timing is pure 'bot. It's on a clock.
Minus: If you have a better explanation, have at it.
Blogger stats are complete BS.
You left several comments on my last post. Les commented. Each visit and comment should be a hit, yet my bl0gger stats say there was ONE visit to my bl0g. If you have a better explanation than the stats are bullplop, you can have at it.
Post a Comment