Bing... Here are some key points about the role of the court jester...
Entertainment and Humor: Jesters were primarily known for their comedic performances, which included storytelling, music, juggling, acrobatics, and magic tricks.
Advisory Role: Beyond entertainment, jesters often served as trusted advisers. Their unique position allowed them to critique political decisions and social norms under the guise of humor.
Freedom of Speech: Jesters had a certain degree of freedom to speak truth to power. This ability to communicate unpleasant truths in a humorous way was a significant aspect of their role.
Historical Roots: The concept of the jester can be traced back to ancient Rome and became more prominent in medieval Europe.
Complex Role: While they are often depicted as simple fools, jesters were intelligent and skilled individuals who could navigate the complexities of court life.
...the "rational" reason as a set up for the "irrational reason" of the Analyst Discourse... the rational reading of the Master's jouissance for the hysteric, who otherwise would have to laugh (or more likely, cry).
You wrote a post that said Yarvin would be tRump's court jester. Forgot already? I haven't watched the video. I assume it consists of the insane ravings of Curtis Yarvin? 32 minutes is pretty long.
Link to refresh your memory. But it wasn't that long ago.
You claim to read mine all the time (acta non verba), assuming that I'm a white supremacist and that I hate minorities. It's why you think yourself morally superior and resort to try to shame your opponents and me and call them/ me "racist" instead of addressing their/ my arguments. It doesn't work, because you can't read minds.
I can't read minds. I only draw logical conclusions based on your words. And your desire to see a David Duke endorsed White Supremacist to the White House.
This entire "Kamala Harris isn't Black" baloney is incredibly racist. What am I supposed to think?
Logical conclusions aren't polemical "ends". Sometimes their only nudges in the opposite direction. Meden agan! You draw extreme polemical end conclusions, not small movements in an opposite direction to temper an excess.
For example, David Duke is a racist asshole. I keep telling you that I have nothing in common with him, yet you keep placing us together. You push the polemical direction to its ultimate extreme limit. I advocate racial neutrality, to counter your historically based affirmative racism. I find that approach stupidly simplistic and a perpetuation of injustice.
22 comments:
Bing... Here are some key points about the role of the court jester...
Entertainment and Humor: Jesters were primarily known for their comedic performances, which included storytelling, music, juggling, acrobatics, and magic tricks.
Advisory Role: Beyond entertainment, jesters often served as trusted advisers. Their unique position allowed them to critique political decisions and social norms under the guise of humor.
Freedom of Speech: Jesters had a certain degree of freedom to speak truth to power. This ability to communicate unpleasant truths in a humorous way was a significant aspect of their role.
Historical Roots: The concept of the jester can be traced back to ancient Rome and became more prominent in medieval Europe.
Complex Role: While they are often depicted as simple fools, jesters were intelligent and skilled individuals who could navigate the complexities of court life.
PMCs are Court jesters? Who knew? I always saw them as the University Discourse. In other words, the "straight man" of a comedy duo.
...the "rational" reason as a set up for the "irrational reason" of the Analyst Discourse... the rational reading of the Master's jouissance for the hysteric, who otherwise would have to laugh (or more likely, cry).
You wrote a post that said Yarvin would be tRump's court jester. Forgot already? I haven't watched the video. I assume it consists of the insane ravings of Curtis Yarvin? 32 minutes is pretty long.
Link to refresh your memory. But it wasn't that long ago.
I wrote that Spot should Run, too. Is Spot dressed up in a Harlequinne suit?
Unlike you, I don't claim an ability to read minds.
You can quote where I claimed to be able to read minds?
You claim to read mine all the time (acta non verba), assuming that I'm a white supremacist and that I hate minorities. It's why you think yourself morally superior and resort to try to shame your opponents and me and call them/ me "racist" instead of addressing their/ my arguments. It doesn't work, because you can't read minds.
...and yet you think you can.
I can't read minds. I only draw logical conclusions based on your words. And your desire to see a David Duke endorsed White Supremacist to the White House.
This entire "Kamala Harris isn't Black" baloney is incredibly racist. What am I supposed to think?
Logical conclusions aren't polemical "ends". Sometimes their only nudges in the opposite direction. Meden agan! You draw extreme polemical end conclusions, not small movements in an opposite direction to temper an excess.
For example, David Duke is a racist asshole. I keep telling you that I have nothing in common with him, yet you keep placing us together. You push the polemical direction to its ultimate extreme limit. I advocate racial neutrality, to counter your historically based affirmative racism. I find that approach stupidly simplistic and a perpetuation of injustice.
Racism doesn't have to be the perpetual zero-sum game that you're making it into.
It can end by discontinuing the practice.
Minus: For example, David Duke is a racist asshole. I keep telling you that I have nothing in common with him, yet you keep placing us together.
Minus: Racism doesn't have to be the perpetual zero-sum game that you're making it into.
That is what White Supremacists are doing. I don't stand with you. I stand in opposition to you.
You have your support of tRump in common. I'm not placing you and Duke together, you are.
And you stand with Louis Farrakahn and the NOI. Got it.
Even Malcom X didn't double down on stupid like you.
Minus: And you stand with Louis Farrakahn and the NOI.
No.
Dervnac The Imbecile Sanders acts like he can read minds by participating in Occultic rituals at his snake mosque.
...sit and pray, then.
No thanks.
Maybe Barack will let you sit next to him at Rev Wright's then.
Post a Comment