Minus: Jill's doing a great job running the country.
Joe Biden is doing a great job running the country. Whoever your delusions want to give credit to... If you think a great job is being done, that must mean you are going to vote Biden in 2024?
Re "Qtard can explain what it thinks the "inner contradiction" is? I doubt it"...
Looks like I was right. Given that Qtard failed to explain. Just babbled some nonsense about me being required to go to Red Square to state my opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine.
Qtard has been to Red Square to state it's opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine? Is Qtard a Russian citizen? Or is Qtard an "op-POSER"?
Qtard: What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A.
Nobody does. Because "Rush'A" is imaginary. It only exists in Qtard's delusions.
Qtard: ...you CANNOT vote for or against liliPut.
Of course not. Because no such thing as "liliPut" exists. I CAN vote for Joe Biden. Joe Biden who is FOR helping Ukraine defend itself against Putin's invasion.
Qtard: Your opinions... they not imortant.
"Imortant"? I dunno what what means. I assume it is Qtardese?
If you mean "important", I never said my opinions are. You think yours are? "Important", I mean. If you wrote "imortant" and meant it... well, I dunno what that means. Like I said.
Qtard: Who listening to em, anyway? Spiders that living with you in your basement?
I don't live in a basement.
Qtard: Like USA politics. dRump or Bi-den.
Why don't you shuddup about it then?
btw, "propaganda piglet"? That's NewSpeak for someone who seeks out facts and rejects propaganda, yes?
Qtard: What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A\\ Nobody does. Because "Rush'A" is imaginary. It only exists in Qtard's delusions\\ And liliPut too?
Right. Neither "Rush'A" nor "liliPut" exists.
Qtard: So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things.
No. Why would I do that?
Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos.
Qtard: \\If you mean "important", I never said my opinions are\\ But never the less... you like to pound on them.
Because we're discussing American politics and our opinions on them. If you don't want to do that you can leave.
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em.
Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be.
Qtard: What a miserly stupid schmuk you are.
Your alter ego? Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?
Qtard: \\I don't live in a basement\\ And don't watching Star Trek. And do not fap on Pelosi poster.
Me? No, I don't do any of those things. Maybe it's a list of your favorite activities?
Qtard: \\Why don't you shuddup about it then?\\ Because you constantly accusing me in not showing enough admitration of that totally indifferent to me... things.
Me? Or you're talking to one of your alter egos? If you mean me, that means you have showed some admiration for things I've said? Just not enough? But I never made any such accusation.
Qtard: Why you, really?
I have no idea why your alter ego is doing what you describe.
Qtard: \\btw, "propaganda piglet"? That's NewSpeak for someone who seeks out facts and rejects propaganda, yes?\\I like you cringing this way.
Now your alter ego is cringing?
Qtard: Please cringe more.
Qtard dunno what "cringe" means? Can it explain why it thinks I am (or its alter ego is) cringing?
Qtard: \\Right. Neither "Rush'A" nor "liliPut" exists\\ Same as dRump?
Well, I guess I was wrong. Google says "LiLiPUT, initially known as Kleenex, were a Swiss punk rock band formed in Zürich in 1978".
So that is who you have been talking about?
I Googled "drump" and found a definition that says it is "the shit you take a day after anal intercourse".
That's what you've been talking about? Dumps you take after sex with your boyfriend?
Qtard: So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things\\ No. Why would I do that?\\ LOOK ABOVE...
Where? In the sky? Definitely not anywhere on this blog.
Qtard: \\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos\\ Yeah? And you can confirm that with QUOTE?
Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that.
Qtard: \\Because we're discussing American politics and our opinions on them. If you don't want to do that you can leave\\ As I said... Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
As you said to your alter ego?
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?
Whatever.
Qtard: What a miserly stupid schmuk you are\\ Your alter ego? Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?\\And HOW it could be MY alter-ego??? Dare to EXPLAIN?
Qtard dunno what "explain" means. You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?".
Qtard: But you will not, you will only start talking with/among your alter-ego.
I did explain. Qtard just failed to understand. Because it is an idiot. And, btw, "Qtard" is not my alter ego. I am referring to you.
Qtard: Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy?
Talking to your alter ego.
Qtard: \\Me? No, I don't do any of those things. Maybe it's a list of your favorite activities?\\ And also... you are counter-factual liar. So... you just lied about not doing it.
And how would you know? Far far away mind reading? Clairvoyance?
Qtard: While trying to reditrect it at some of your numerous alter-egos -- which doing bad things in your stead, yes?
No.
Qtard: Please cringe more\\ Qtard dunno what "cringe" means? Can it explain why it thinks I am (or its alter ego is) cringing?\\Thanky for submitting to my request.
\\Where? In the sky? Definitely not anywhere on this blog.
Because you have histerical blindness??? :-))))))
Toward OWN WORDS. :-)))))
Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
Damn madman you are. :-))))
\\Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that.
There was... but you was not able to see it.
Because of your histerical blindness? ;-P
Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else. Which is rediculous claim.
So, I just tryed to make it reasonable. ;-P
\\Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?
\\Whatever.
Yap.
Now you confirmed that "dunno" and "whatever" are also possible.
\\Qtard dunno what "explain" means. You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?".
Yap.
In your delusional mind IT can think so.
That babbling something unrelated is "explaining". ;-P
Because IT is an idiot. :-))))
\\I did explain. Qtard just failed to understand. Because it is an idiot. And, btw, "Qtard" is not my alter ego. I am referring to you.
Yap.
The same as earlier you screamed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
Now you trying to claim "I EXPLAINED"... about something you babbled directly from your delusional feverish mind.
But... continue-continue. It makes it only MOAR hilarious. ;-P
Qtard: Because you have histerical blindness??? Toward OWN WORDS.
No. I have "blindness" re words that were never written by me. Only seen by you in your delusions.
Qtard: Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?
Qtard: Damn madman you are.
I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Qtard: \\Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that\\ There was... but you was not able to see it. Because of your histerical blindness?
Because I can't see your delusions.
Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else.
Lie. Given that I never have.
Qtard: Which is rediculous claim.
You realize this, yet you keep doing it.
Qtard: So, I just tryed to make it reasonable.
By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?\\Whatever\\ Yap. Now you confirmed that "dunno" and "whatever" are also possible.
Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question.
Qtard: \\...You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?"\\ Yap. In your delusional mind IT can think so. That babbling something unrelated is "explaining".
Explaining you can't understand due to your idiocy. Well, NMP.
Qtard: Because IT is an idiot. :-))))
Talking to your alter ego.
Qtard: The same as earlier you screamed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
Lie. That never happened.
Qtard: Now you trying to claim "I EXPLAINED"... about something you babbled directly from your delusional feverish mind.
Oh. Talking to your alter ego again. Describing how you arrive at your "explainations".
Qtard: Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy?\\ Talking to your alter ego\\ Yeah. One posting here under nickname Dervish Sanders...
You were addressing "Derpy". At first I thought you were referring to me, but this "Derpy" is saying things I never wrote. So you must be talking about yourself. Blaming an alter ego to call "Derpy". Logic.
Qtard: You trully are crazy, De-Ru-Pun.
"De-Ru-Pi" and "De-Ru-Pun"... Both of these alter egos of yours are truly crazy.
Qtard: \\And how would you know? Far far away mind reading? Clairvoyance?\\ Yes. Percieving Facts... its something like "clairvoyance"... to such an rotten brains idiot as De-Ru-Pun.
You didn't cite any facts, just delusions. But I agree with you about your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun". It's brains as definitely rotten.
Qtard: Abilty to see FACTS (like Sun rising in the morning) and make conclusion out of it, with using LOGIC... is just unimaginable, to such an idiot.
Qtard saw a fact about someone "fapping" on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. But mistook me for one of its alter egos. Gotcha.
Qtard: FACTS that visible to anyone, who would dare to read through this blog.
No. Nobody can see you fapping on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. Did see you admit to doing that though.
Qtard: But... De-Ru-Pun have a histeric blindness -- so it unable to see texts here, as it admitted above.
I did see your alter ego admit that.
Qtard: \\Didn't\\Cause you histerical blindness not allowed you to see it?
\\No. I have "blindness" re words that were never written by me. Only seen by you in your delusions.
But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES??? :-)))))
Yap. You are definitely crazy junk.
\\Qtard: Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
\\No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
"Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."? ;-P
You really are crazy junk.
\\Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
\\Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?
And you can CONFIRM that *I* demonstrate "this behavior"??? :-)))))
Naaah.
Because that is just feverish delusion of a crazy junk. ;-P
\\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Names. Please give names!
So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos. ;-P
Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd? :-)))))
\\Because I can't see your delusions.
Yap.
Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders. :-)))))
That is... "delusions". Visible to anyone. Except Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun. ;-P
\\Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else.
\\Lie. Given that I never have.
JUST ABOVE.
I'll repeat it here... as you showed INABILITY to scroll back the text to re-read it... might be because of that histerical blindness...
Here.
\\No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
I made it in bold -- to be even more easily to see. ;-P
That is -- what you say about PERFECT QUOTES of your own words.
Like about this excerpt -- "I *DO* deny..." about which you whining that you "I NEVER said it"... though you said, and NEVER admitted it was mistake... only Doubled-Down on SAME SHITTY claims.
But... you will claim that NEVER HAPPEN. AGAIN!
Cause you are crazy junk.
with totally disfunctional brain.
That do not allow to you to see FACTS. :-)))))
Like one that Sun rising in the morning. And dRump is not in jail. And quite probably will became your next POTUS. AGAIN! ;-P
\\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?
Yep.
In a post made from account Dervish Sanders. ;-P
\\Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question.
Yeah.
Because I am All-knowing. And All-wise. And can answer to ANY question. :-))))
But... that is what Crazy Junk Derpy thinks about itself. Probably.
That's why it trying to project his shit on me.
Well, anyway.
You just said "Whatever" itself.
Does it mean that that was a LIE too. ;-P
And you just admitted being liar -- by YOU OWN this discretion?
Or THIS all claim "Or lying" was a LIE?
Cause you know.
In LOGIC. There is MAIN RULE -- tertium non datur. Logical claim can be either TRUE. Or FALSE. And no other.
And two logical claims. About SAME thing. Cannot be one TRUE. And other FALSE.
Like Sky is blue. And Sky is NOT blue.
\\Explaining you can't understand due to your idiocy. Well, NMP.
Non-explaining. That gives no clues. Do not refer to any facts. Do not contain any logic.
Just described state of mind of one certain Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
Of course I cannot understand such crazy babbling. I am not psychiatrist. ;-P
\\Oh. Talking to your alter ego again. Describing how you arrive at your "explainations".
Certainly... that is what you do with your alter-egos.
That's why this silly projections.
But you continue-continue.
I am interested in listening more details about your feverish delusions. ;-P
Madmans are not so available, to observe their behavior in vivo. :-))))
\\You were addressing "Derpy". At first I thought you were referring to me, but this "Derpy" is saying things I never wrote. So you must be talking about yourself. Blaming an alter ego to call "Derpy". Logic.
You Derpy do not see own words. Because of histerical blindness.
Or because of some of your alter-egos have written that words -- that's why you (one of alter-egos who are in charge now) cannot recognize that words as yours?
Even when I copy-paste it with header -- that that is excerpt from post of certain someone Dervish Sanders? :-)))))
Yap.
Cause you are Crazy Junk... De-Ru-Pun. :-))))
\\"De-Ru-Pi" and "De-Ru-Pun"... Both of these alter egos of yours are truly crazy.
Derpy admitted that talking with me inflicted TWO MORE alter-egos in its brain? ;-P
:-))))))))
\\You didn't cite any facts, just delusions. But I agree with you about your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun". It's brains as definitely rotten.
Yap.
"Delusions". Which exist in Real World -- like Sun rising in the morning.
Such -- "delusions"? ;-P
You are crazy. Go admit it. :-))))
\\Qtard: Abilty to see FACTS (like Sun rising in the morning) and make conclusion out of it, with using LOGIC... is just unimaginable, to such an idiot.
\\Qtard saw a fact about someone "fapping" on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. But mistook me for one of its alter egos. Gotcha.
:-))))))
You are self-revealing, derp. ;-P
\\Qtard: FACTS that visible to anyone, who would dare to read through this blog.
\\No. Nobody can see you fapping on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. Did see you admit to doing that though.
You admitting that that was bullseye -- that you have such fantasies. ;-P
Because... I have said many thing here.
But you showed that you do not remember em.
Even if it was in cimment from yesterday. Even if that is YOUR OWN DAMN words.
But this thing... you seems like remembering. How? Why?
If that is not bullseye. ;-P
\\Qtard: But... De-Ru-Pun have a histeric blindness -- so it unable to see texts here, as it admitted above.
\\I did see your alter ego admit that.
In your delusion. And therefore you cannot QUOTE it? ;-P
Or... sorry, I need to ask you in your DEMN NewSpeak.
You "saw" it in your inner "true reality"... but as that "true reality" have no connections with common to all us Reality... you cannot copy-paste it, and give QUOTE. Yes, De-Ru-Pun? :-))))))
\\Qtard: \\Didn't\\Cause you histerical blindness not allowed you to see it?
\\Because I can't see your delusions.
Yeah.
You CANNOT come to your computer. Open in browser this blog. And reread YOUR OWN comments you have written...
because your alter-egos FORBID you? ;-P
Well... that is known effect of muilty-personality -- memories of alter-egos are usually blocked, to support that illusion that "somebody else did it".
Which are in accordance with behavior of certain someone posting under nicjname Dervish Sanders here.
Well, as well as pretending being some other person. Some honorary judge.
Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???
Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?
Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?
Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights".
Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.\\ Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?\\ And you can CONFIRM that *I* demonstrate "this behavior"?
No. Sorry, I should have said that your mind is so damn screwed that it causes you to see "quotes" that were never made. Like when you claimed I was "stating ... opposition to non-existing things". Which never happened. Yet you somehow "saw" that did.
Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!
You don't know your own name? Amnesia?
Qtard: So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos.
I dunno. You tell me which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos.
Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?
Maybe. I dunno.
Qtard: \\Because I can't see your delusions\\ Yap. Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders.
You think my comments are your delusions? That's strange.
Qtard: That is... "delusions". Visible to anyone. Except Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" can't see comments? Is De-Ru-Pun blind?
Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else\\ Lie. Given that I never have\\ JUST ABOVE\\ I'll repeat it here... as you showed INABILITY to scroll back the text to re-read it... might be because of that histerical blindness... Here\\ No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often\\ I made it in bold -- to be even more easily to see\\ That is -- what you say about PERFECT QUOTES of your own words.
I do not. Never have. Never will.
Qtard: Like about this excerpt -- "I *DO* deny..." about which you whining that you "I NEVER said it"... though you said, and NEVER admitted it was mistake... only Doubled-Down on SAME SHITTY claims.
Lie. I never said I do deny anyone their rights.
Qtard: But... you will claim that NEVER HAPPEN. AGAIN!
Right. Because it didn't.
Qtard: Cause you are crazy junk.
Your alter ego? Because it keeps making the same false claim over and over? I agree.
Qtard: with totally disfunctional brain. That do not allow to you to see FACTS. Like one that Sun rising in the morning.
Lie. I never said the sun doesn't rise in the morning.
Qtard: And dRump is not in jail. And quite probably will became your next POTUS. AGAIN! ;-P
Lie. I never said tRump is in jail. He might be the next potus, but I doubt it. More likely he is going to prison. But he is not there now.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders.
Never happened.
Qtard: \\Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question\\ Yeah. Because I am All-knowing. And All-wise. And can answer to ANY question.
Lie. I wasn't talking about ANY question. Questions you posed. For example -- about gay people and a woman's right to bodily autonomy. You said you had no idea what it was all about. Then you later admitted you dislike that Democrats stand up for the rights of these people. Because they never had any rights and could previously be freely discriminated against.
Qtard: But... that is what Crazy Junk Derpy thinks about itself. Probably.
I think so. Your alter ego "Crazy Junk Derpy" probably does think that about itself.
Qtard: That's why it trying to project his shit on me.
\\Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!
\\You don't know your own name? Amnesia?
Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
As it's easy to see to anyone -- CORRECT quote are:"" \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Names. Please give names!
So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos. ;-P
Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd? :-))))) ""
And do not leave place for such crazy conclusions.
But... Derpy is crazy... that's why it writing such a crazy thing.
It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it. :-))))
All in FULL accordance with facts.
Yawn.
Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder. :-))))
\\No. Sorry, I should have said that your mind is so damn screwed that it causes you to see "quotes" that were never made. Like when you claimed I was "stating ... opposition to non-existing things". Which never happened. Yet you somehow "saw" that did.
:-))))))
\\Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?
\\Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights".
Because QUOTES -- it's REFERENCE.
And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
You CONFIRMED it... itself.
That you denied "having such right" -- which in relation to Human Rights -- which ARE unse\verable -- can ony mean that your "I *DO* deny..." means denial of humans to be Human.
Which is Nazi-trait. SAME what nazi DID with Jews -- denyed em having Human Rights.
\\Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???
\\Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?
Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard". ;-P
YET ONE confirmation of deep rotting of Derpy's brains....
Qtard: And you can provide some firm evidances of it?
You provided "firm evidences" that I have multiple personalities? Like a diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?
Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only, Your Moronity Most Squiky DEMN I-D-I-O-T Derpy.
Talking to your alter ego?
Qtard: Being humans. Having immanent Human Rights...
Oh, so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?
Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
In accordance with reality. Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya.
A fact that likely makes the Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING Qtard very happy. Why it so strongly opposes such people (who it hates) from having their rights protected.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!
NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?
Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.\\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos\\ JUST IN THIS THREAD.
Like someone suffering delusions (as you clearly are) would know it.
Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it.
Quote me. You won't. Because I never said that.
Qtard: False? While confirmed with FACT "false"?
No.
Qtard: NewSpeak "false"?
No.
Qtard: \\Lie. I never said I do deny anyone their rights\\ And you wasn't say "I *DO* deny..."???
Partial out-of-context quote.
Qtard: What a blatant lie.
Yeah. You lied blatantly about that partial out-of-context quote. And you keep lying about it. Over and over and over.
Qtard: \\Because I can't see your delusions\\ Yap. Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders\\ You think my comments are your delusions? That's strange\\ YET ONE confirmation. That Reality is "delusion" to it, to Derpy Sanders.
Non confirmation.
\\Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?\\ Maybe. I dunno\\ Uncertain about what of your alter-egos was in charge that time?
No. I was uncertain about which of YOUR alter-egos was in charge that time.
Qtard: Natural thing for a split-personality person.
Like you?
Qtard: YET ONE confirmation.
That you're crazy? I think so.
Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!\\ You don't know your own name? Amnesia?\\ Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
Yours?
Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?
Confirmed. Qtard calls one of its alter egos "Nobody" and another one it calls "republiturd". That's in addition to the alter egos "De-Ru-Pi", "De-Ru-Pun" and "Derpy".
Qtard: But... Derpy is crazy... that's why it writing such a crazy thing.
Agreed. Your alter ego "Derpy" is crazy.
Qtard: It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it.
Who is going to scream that? One of your alter egos?
Qtard: All in FULL accordance with facts.
No.
Qtard: Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder.
If you say so. I don't know anything about your mental illnesses except what I've witnessed here.
Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?\\ Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights"\\ Because QUOTES -- it's REFERENCE.
Yeah. Proof that you fake them.
Qtard: And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
You know too. But lie about it anyway.
Qtard: You CONFIRMED it... itself. That you denied "having such right" -- which in relation to Human Rights -- which ARE unse\verable -- can ony mean that your "I *DO* deny..." means denial of humans to be Human.
Qtard: Which is Nazi-trait. SAME what nazi DID with Jews -- denyed em having Human Rights.
Saying there is no "sore loser right" to violently overturn the results of a legitimate democratic election is in no way the same as Nazis murdering Jews. That is pure stupidity. And offensive.
Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???\\ Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?\\ Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard".
Now your alter egos have alter egos? What's next? Your alter ego's alter ego is going to have an alter ego?
Qtard: YET ONE confirmation of deep rotting of Derpy's brains....
Your alter ego's brain and your brain too. They are the same brain.
\\Dervish Sanders said... Qtard: And you can provide some firm evidances of it?
\\You provided "firm evidences" that I have multiple personalities? Like a diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?
Your own words here.
Yawn.
Like THIS words -- DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist. ;-P
\\Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only, Your Moronity Most Squiky DEMN I-D-I-O-T Derpy.
\\Talking to your alter ego?
And... HOW? ;-P
Try to build some chain of conclusion, that could make it plausible... at least on surface.
But, naaah.
You CAN'T.
Cause you are I-D-I-O-T. :-))))))
\\Qtard: Being humans. Having immanent Human Rights...
\\Oh, so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?
Yap.
Non-democratic ones. Where they do what totalitarian Derpy likes -- "protection from vioalations" -- just call homosexuality a "violation"... and feel free itself to "protect" people from it. ;-P
INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
\\Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
\\In accordance with reality. Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya.
Yap.
Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
By declaring that they "did nit have em to begin with". And etc.
Totalitarian scumbags of all of the World (like that same liliPut) DO ABSOLUTELY THE SAME as you Derpy -- they "*DO* deny..." people having "immanent and unseverable Human Rights".
And even SAME. Word-to-word SAME.
That is liliPutin's talking point "see, their Human Rights do not protect em"... means, better go seek protection from it, from liliPut.
It talking to own people. And advertise to all of the World.
For people to fall on their knees, and to beg Mighty liliPut... to protect em.
Give em "Protection from violations". INSTEAD of Human Rights.
\\Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!
\\NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?
Oh?
Yet one word from NewSpeak you decided to reveal to me.
As an expert in NewSpeak.
You say you don't know.
But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
\\Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it.
But you ALREADY showed that you know that CONTEXT perfectly well.
Now that is just a sheer lie. ;-P
YET ONE self-revealing of being blatant counter-factual liar. :-)))))
\\Yeah. You lied blatantly about that partial out-of-context quote. And you keep lying about it. Over and over and over.
Yap...
"partial out-of-context quote" that was repeated many-many times.
And you many-many times showed that your PERFECTLY know what that quote refering to -- your denial of people to have thair IMMANENT Human Rigths.
So now you decided to cover it with more denials and blatant lies. :-))))))
Continue-continue like that. ;-P
\\\\Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?\\ Maybe. I dunno\\ Uncertain about what of your alter-egos was in charge that time?
\\No. I was uncertain about which of YOUR alter-egos was in charge that time.
I undestand your confusion.
Having such unsteady choir in one's head... you seeing talking with me like with yet one of your alter-egos, am I right? ;-P
Well, hardly you'd be able to confirm it in your delusonal state, in a straight way... but no biggy, I am smart enough to devise it from your junky response too. :-)))))
\\\\ Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
\\Yours?
Like that is *I* saying that I do not see, do not remember written even up above in under the same post thread.... :-))))))
\\Qtard: It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it.
\\Who is going to scream that? One of your alter egos?
\\Qtard: All in FULL accordance with facts.
\\No.
Asked such a sneak question... but then started screaming "No!" right away.
So self-revealingly. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder.
\\If you say so. I don't know anything about your mental illnesses except what I've witnessed here.
Yap.
You are perfect witness of your mental illness.
That's why I so inteested to know every tiny detail of it.
Like names of your alter-egos. And etc.
Even if it quite hard to make you to spill that bean. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
\\You know too. But lie about it anyway.
Well.
You just ADMITTED... what you tryed to DENY just above.
Which mean that was blatant lies... that, about "partial out of context" quiting. ;-P
And.... where is MY lie???
I just CONFIRMED that you denyed "having such rights" - means, you like that Nazis, tryed to deny humans being Human.
\\Saying there is no "sore loser right" to violently overturn the results of a legitimate democratic election is in no way the same as Nazis murdering Jews. That is pure stupidity. And offensive.
Historical hint: Nazi did not start from murders too.
First they started calling em "pests". You call "republiturds/magaturds".
Then started blaming em for anything and everything. So do you.
Then, declared that there is no place for em to go around other people -- and that is what you declared here about "J6 insurrectionists"... that, SOMEHOW for them to go by public streets, being present in public places, going into public buildinga... is SOMEHOW is a CRIME.
And to cover for that... you started denying em Human Rights.
Means, yeah, you are half-way to what Nazis did to Jews.
But do we need to wait for you to make another half-step???
\\Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???\\ Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?\\ Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard".
\\Now your alter egos have alter egos? What's next? Your alter ego's alter ego is going to have an alter ego?
You tell.
You seems so KNOWLEDGIBLE.
And so EXPERIENCED.
;-P
\\But you and your alter ego -- they are both you.
Yes?
Then why you deny that earlier written by you... I mean by your body, words -- are not yours? ;-P
Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist.
I haven't.
Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only ... Derpy\\ Talking to your alter ego?\\ And... HOW? Try to build some chain of conclusion, that could make it plausible...
You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself. Certainly you could not be talking to me, given I have exhibited any moronity.
Qtard: ...so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?\\Non-democratic ones. Where they do what totalitarian Derpy likes ... just call homosexuality a "violation"... and feel free itself to "protect" people from it.
But homosexuality isn't a "violation". Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed.
Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
You say.
Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
Your alter ego again. You're always blaming it for your totalitarian anti-human-rights proclivities.
Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude.
Qtard: By declaring that they "did nit have em to begin with". And etc.
But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them.
Qtard: Totalitarian scumbags of all of the World (like that same liliPut) DO ABSOLUTELY THE SAME as you Derpy -- they "*DO* deny..." people having "immanent and unseverable Human Rights".
Talking about your alter ego Derpy. Though you partially quote me again. Add lies to that partial quote. To suggest that is what I meant. When it is not. Because you are a heinous liar.
Qtard: That is liliPutin's talking point "see, their Human Rights do not protect em"... means, better go seek protection from it, from liliPut.
Lie. Gay people are discriminated against IN LAW in Russia. Putin does not protect them.
Qtard: For people to fall on their knees, and to beg Mighty liliPut... to protect em.
Lie. He doesn't.
Qtard: Give em "Protection from violations". INSTEAD of Human Rights.
Neither.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ in a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!\\NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?\\ Oh? Yet one word from NewSpeak you decided to reveal to me.
You revealed to me. By calling my factual comment "counter-factual".
Qtard: As an expert in NewSpeak.
What you're claiming to be?
Qtard: You say you don't know. But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
By you? Yeah, I think so.
Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it\\ Quote me. You won't...\\ Easy-Peasy. You said "I believe in facts".
That isn't a quote of me saying "it doesn't matter because I don't want to believe it".
"Want" has nothing to do with it. Being a fact (or not being a fact) is all that matters.
Qtard: But you claiming not saying it?
Your fake quote about me not wanting to believe? And that not wanting to believe facts allows me to dismiss them? No, I never said anything like that. Proven by your inability to give a quote.
Qtard: Because you "never said it"?
Right. I didn't say it. You did. Another of "what Derpy really mean" lies.
\\Ok. So you can't. Thanky for admitting you lied.
As always.
Hiserical blindness.
And moronity.
:-)))))))
\\Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist.
\\I haven't.
Yes?
Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?"???
Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed. ;-P
Or... you "never have written" it? :-))))))
That was some other your alter-ego? ;-P
\\You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself.
Logically you said.
And you DO KNOW what LOGIC is?
And WHY what you said can be called "logical"?
Or... you are just a moron, who trying to use words it do not get, in pretentious try to "look smart"? ;-P
"Hypocrisy -- that is tribute vice paying to virtue".
\\Certainly you could not be talking to me, given I have exhibited any moronity.
Why not???
I am tolerant to a fools. ;-P
Find em... fascinating even.
\\But homosexuality isn't a "violation".
Neither having white skin. Or having own, even if opposite to your political views.
But when it did stop you???
\\Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed.
Moronic projection.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
\\You say.
Well.
YOU have said that there is some gays killed.
And now you trying to disavow ONW WORDS?
AGAIN??? :-)))))
\\Your alter ego again. You're always blaming it for your totalitarian anti-human-rights proclivities.
That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
\\That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude.
I'm glad that you admitting it is bad thing... for very least.
Even though keep clutching at your histerical blindness that that is not you, what doing it.
\\But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them.
Same as J6 "insurrectionists"? ;-P
\\Talking about your alter ego Derpy. Though you partially quote me again. Add lies to that partial quote. To suggest that is what I meant. When it is not. Because you are a heinous liar.
Yeah.
Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...
And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?
\\Lie. Gay people are discriminated against IN LAW in Russia. Putin does not protect them.
Thjose who pander to it -- like most of his propagandists, who are open and even proud gay -- he do.
That is those who are opposing him politicly, he not.
That is what totalitarian "protection" is about.
But whom I explaining it to. :-)))))
\\Qtard: As an expert in NewSpeak.
\\What you're claiming to be?
On what base? This claim?
On FIGURELY cutted out of context quote?
:-))))))
\\Qtard: You say you don't know. But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
\\By you? Yeah, I think so.
YOU explained meaning of that word. In NewSpeak.
And now you trying to turn that table and point finger at me -- perfectly what a heinous liar would do. ;-P
\\That isn't a quote of me saying "it doesn't matter because I don't want to believe it".
Hah.
You -- liar. Should tell such Truth???
Whom are kidding???? :-)))))
Liars -- DO NOT tell Truth. They trying to AVOID it. And pack in some deceptive camuflage.
Since -- your claim "I believe in facts" -- which is moronic. And counter-factual. IMPOSSIBLE claim.
Because there is NO way how one can believe or not believe in facts...
Because facts just IS. And NOTHING will change from anybody beliieveing or disbelieving em.
\\"Want" has nothing to do with it. Being a fact (or not being a fact) is all that matters.
Believing -- it's HUMAN's ability ONLY. Depends on WANTING.
And absolutely INDEPENDEDNT from any facts.
Credo ipso absurdum.
As that. That is YET ONE of YOUR moronic lies.
\\Your fake quote about me not wanting to believe?
What "faked quote"???
That you said "I believe in facts"?
And said it many time.
And showed utter stubborness in doubling-down on it.
So what??? Now you disavowing it? You no more "believe in facts"???
Naaah.
That is just a lie.
\\And that not wanting to believe facts allows me to dismiss them? No, I never said anything like that. Proven by your inability to give a quote.
You BEHAVED like that.
Your DEEDS are FACTS.
Your mere WORDS -- NOT. ;-P
Especially as you confirmed many-many time that your nothing else but hypoctical and idiotic liar -- one lying too obviously, trying to say "I never said it" about OWN WORDS JUST SAID. :-)))))
Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist\\ I haven't\\ Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How???
If you went to one. He would diagnose you. That is how it works.
Qtard: Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed.
You are only revealing your delusions. You dunno anything about my confidential health information.
Qtard: Or... you "never have written" it?
I never wrote anything about my confidential health information. Or being "disturbed" about you revealing it. Because you know nothing.
Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?
It was something that didn't happen.
Qtard: \\You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself\\ Logically you said. And you DO KNOW what LOGIC is?
Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not.
Qtard: And WHY what you said can be called "logical"?
Right above. The moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it.
Qtard: Or... you are just a moron, who trying to use words it do not get, in pretentious try to "look smart"?
That's you. And you've failed spectacularly.
Qtard: \\Certainly you could not be talking to me, given that I have not exhibited any moronity\\ Why not???
I have not exhibited any moronity.
Qtard: I am tolerant to a fools. Find em... fascinating even.
So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care.
Qtard: \\But homosexuality isn't a "violation"\\ Neither having white skin. Or having own, even if opposite to your political views.
Of course not.
Qtard: But when it did stop you???
I dunno what you're talking about. What do you think I am not stopped from?
Qtard: \\Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed\\ Moronic projection.
Logical conclusion. Not projection. I don't want gay people killed.
Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights\\ You say\\ YOU have said that there is some gays killed. And now you trying to disavow ONW WORDS?
Why would I disavow true words?
Qtard: AGAIN???
Impossible. I'd have to have done it at least once. In order to do it "again".
Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
Lie. I never said that.
Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights\\ That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude\\ I'm glad that you admitting it is bad thing... for very least.
But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments.
Qtard: Even though keep clutching at your histerical blindness that that is not you, what doing it.
Impossible. I can't "keep" doing something I have never done before.
Qtard: \\But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them\\ Same as J6 "insurrectionists"?
Depends on what "rights" you're talking about. Not imaginary "rights" Qtard made up and called "immanent".
Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...
Of course they do.
Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?
\\Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist\\ I haven't\\ Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How???
\\If you went to one. He would diagnose you. That is how it works.
What for???
Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
Means... do you have such symptoms???
Like uncontrollable moronic lying? ;-P
Like spontaneous lose of memory? ;-P
Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal? ;-P
\\Qtard: Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed.
\\You are only revealing your delusions. You dunno anything about my confidential health information.
See! :-))))))
Genuinely disturbed.
While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example.
Same time to known that someone is mad.
Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
Because mad thinking they are normal. :-))))))))))
And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR. :-)))))))))
\\Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?
\\It was something that didn't happen.
Yep.
YET ONE symptom of being crazy. :-)))))
\\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not.
Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
Only refering to... as your favorite "listen to me, I'm expert"s???
:-))))))))))))
YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT. ;-P
\\Right above. The moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it.
I see a symptoms in your behavior.
And that is not some flu or something... which really cnnot be seen through texts.
But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. ;-P
So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind. ;-P
\\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly.
Oh, yeah.
And you can give QUOTES?
Or... describe it with your own words... for at least.
I mean in details. Like, when? And with what exactly? ;-P
But naaah, in your mental condintion, writing anything concise like that -- is impossible. :-))))
\\I have not exhibited any moronity.
Yes-yes-yes.
If only it'll make you more cooperative... patient. ;-P
Qtard: Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
Yes, but you are not normal.
Qtard: Means... do you have such symptoms???
No.
Qtard: Like uncontrollable moronic lying?
One of your symptoms.
Qtard: Like spontaneous lose of memory?
Another of your symptoms.
Qtard: Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal?
A 3rd symptom you have exhibited here.
Qtard: \\You dunno anything about my confidential health information\\ See!
No. I don't.
Qtard: Genuinely disturbed.
Qtard thinks stating facts is proof of mental illness? Figures.
Qtard: While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example. Same time to known that someone is mad.
Like you. It is very obvious.
Qtard: Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
That's what happened to you?
Qtard: Because mad thinking they are normal. And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR.
I see you exhibiting that behavior.
Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?\\ It was something that didn't happen\\ Yep. YET ONE symptom of being crazy.
Thinking other people can see your delusions? Apparently that is a symptom. For you, at least.
Qtard: \\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not\\ Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
You misspelled "evidences". So obviously you are talking to yourself. I agree with what you said about yourself.
Qtard: YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT.
I agree. Why you can't point to any.
Qtard: \\the moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it\\ I see a symptoms in your behavior.
You see your delusions.
Qtard: But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind.
You say. To your alter ego.
Qtard: \\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly\\ Oh, yeah. And you can give QUOTES?
Quote: "Demn Propaganda". Used to refer to facts you don't like.
Qtard: \\So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care\\ Writing in. YET ONE symptom -- low empaty.
Self diagnosis?
Qtard: Problems with understanding even symple texts.
Diagnosising yourself more, yes?
Qtard: ...talking about gay people killing. Why??? Have such urges? Voices talking to you you must kill em?
Diagnosising yourself more?
Qtard: Delusional bullshit?
Sounds like you know what's wrong with yourself.
Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
You have said that. Many times. Compared to my zero times.
Qtard: \\But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments\\ YET ONE symptom. False memories. Envisioning people talking anti-gay.
Reading it. Later remembering reading it.
Qtard: YET ONE symptom -- sponataneous lose of memories.
That is sad. That you have lost your memories.
Qtard: Human Rights is "imagiary"... to a Nazi madman De-Ru-Pun... one who write under nick Dervish Sanders here.
Another delusion. Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" never wrote under the nickname Dervish Sanders.
Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...\\Of course they do\\ Then... their rights was violated -- by YOU.
Impossible.
Qtard: Who said that they HAVE NO RIGHT to go by the public streets, enter public buildings, ASK public servant legitimate questions.
No, I never said that. Why would I? I'd be talking about something that didn't happen. Proven by the fact that they were arrested. If things had gone down the way you describe, nobody would have been arrested. Logic.
Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?\\ Never said\\ So??? You disavow you earlier claim?\\ Your "I *DO* deny..."???
No.
Qtard: And you agree that only some Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman could say something like that -- "I *DO* deny..."???
No. That was said by a sane lover of democracy. Only a Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman like you would say the J6 insurrectionists had a "right" to overthrow the results of a fair democratic election. Just because they were sore losers.
You think people became nut because they coming to psychiatrists? ;-P
Certainly what a crazy junk would think. :-))))
\\Qtard: Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
\\Yes, but you are not normal.
Naturally.
From a standpoint of such a crazy junk as you are. ;-P
YET ONE symptom.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Means... do you have such symptoms???
\\No.
Naturally.
Crazy do deny being crazy. ;-P
YET ONE symptom.
\\Qtard: Like uncontrollable moronic lying?
\\One of your symptoms.
LIE you never able... and even do not trying to prove.
Which is moronic as it is.
Which is a proof in itself.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Like spontaneous lose of memory?
\\Another of your symptoms.
Yeah?
And who constantly crying here "I NEVER said it", ah? :-)))))
Ah... I know, not YOU, but some other YOU... out of bunch of crazy junk alter-egos which governing over your body. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal?
\\A 3rd symptom you have exhibited here.
Yap.
YET ONE symptom of your craziness.
Using "you" instead of "I".
\\Qtard: \\You dunno anything about my confidential health information\\ See!
\\No. I don't.
Yeah.
You don't see.
Because of histerical blindness. ;-P
YET ONE....
\\Qtard thinks stating facts is proof of mental illness? Figures.
Yap.
Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard" really showing that trait -- saying that one who stating facts (like that that Sun rising in the morning) are crazy.
YET ONE...
\\Qtard: While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example. Same time to known that someone is mad.
\\Qtard: Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
\\That's what happened to you?
And whom of your alter-egos you asking that? ;-P
\\Qtard: Because mad thinking they are normal. And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR.
\\I see you exhibiting that behavior.
You see something what cannot PROVE that you saw it?
Like with giving QUOTE.
That is what galucination is. ;-P
YET ONE...
\\Thinking other people can see your delusions? Apparently that is a symptom. For you, at least.
Yeah.
YET ONE apparent case of using "you" instead of "I".
Well... that is known condition -- people with certain type of brain damage -- cannot say "I" anymore.
Seems like that is your case.
\\Qtard: \\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not\\ Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
\\You misspelled "evidences". So obviously you are talking to yourself. I agree with what you said about yourself.
YET ONE... apparent using of "you" instead of "I".
Seems like case is closed.
You deiagnosis is settled. ;-P
\\Qtard: YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT.
\\I agree. Why you can't point to any.
Yeah?
And that that Sun rising in the morning -- is not FACT??? :-))))
For a delusional crazy junky De-Ru-Pun.
:-)))))))
\\Qtard: \\the moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it\\ I see a symptoms in your behavior.
\\You see your delusions.
"I" see "my" delusions -- you mean? ;-P
Because it sounds delusionally stupid any other way. You just admitted WITH YOUR OWN WORDS "the moronity you wrote about me"... and then trying to call MY "delusions"??? How can it be???
"Delusion" you can see too. And commenting about.
ONLY with sabsituting that "you" with "I"... it became logical.
Crazy. But logical. Describing delusional reality inside your rotten cabbidge. ;-P
\\Qtard: But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind.
\\You say. To your alter ego.
Oh, yeah. :-))))
Now I can discern it better.
..."I" say. To "my" alter-ego....
As you showed enough with your behavior, that you frewquently loose connection with Reality... and saying that you talk not with me, but with alter-ego of your own... means, with voices in your brain. ;-P
All is pretty damn logical.
Crazy, but logical. Crazy Logic, befirring of such a Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
\\Qtard: \\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly\\ Oh, yeah. And you can give QUOTES?
\\Quote: "Demn Propaganda". Used to refer to facts you don't like.
FACTS like that Sun rising in the morning? Or that dRump not in jail?
That is UNDENIABLE facts... you, I mean your alter-ego, disavowing to "believe in"... frequently.
As well as FACTS -- QUOTES of your own words.
Your numerous alter-egos screaming "I NEVER said it".
:-))))))))
\\Qtard: \\So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care\\ Writing in. YET ONE symptom -- low empaty.
\\Self diagnosis?
Do you think about itself being psychiatrician? ;-P
\\Qtard: ...talking about gay people killing. Why??? Have such urges? Voices talking to you you must kill em?
\\Diagnosising yourself more?
Certainly.
That is YET ONE of Depry's alter-egos have written. Secret Psychiatricain this time? :-))))
\\Sounds like you know what's wrong with yourself.
Sounds like "I" know what's wrong with... itrself. ;-P
\\Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
\\You have said that. Many times. Compared to my zero times.
Yeah. I CITED it many times.
And you... forgetting saying "I *DO* deny..."???
While you confirmed saying that... just yesterday.
What a loose bag of shit... your rotten cabbage. :-)))))
\\Qtard: \\But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments\\ YET ONE symptom. False memories. Envisioning people talking anti-gay.
\\Reading it. Later remembering reading it.
But NOT able to QUOTE.
That is EXACTLY what False Memories are like. ;-P
Thank you for CONFIRMING that.
\\Qtard: YET ONE symptom -- sponataneous lose of memories.
\\That is sad. That you have lost your memories.
My condolences... to you/I. ;-P
\\Qtard: Human Rights is "imagiary"... to a Nazi madman De-Ru-Pun... one who write under nick Dervish Sanders here.
\\Another delusion. Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" never wrote under the nickname Dervish Sanders.
Yap.
Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun think that other people have alter-egos, which wispering into their ears too... :-)))))
And have delusions.
And... well, re-read all above.
\\Qtard: CONFIRM that you are crazy as hell.
\\You already have. Many times.
But... no trace of that "Many times"???
Because that all are False Memories of delusioinal Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...\\Of course they do\\ Then... their rights was violated -- by YOU.
\\Impossible.
:-)))))))
"I deny em having such rights" ;-P
\\Qtard: Who said that they HAVE NO RIGHT to go by the public streets, enter public buildings, ASK public servant legitimate questions.
\\No, I never said that.
YET ONE of famous Derpy's "I never said it".
About which it will be crying "I never said it" too. :-)))))))
\\ If things had gone down the way you describe, nobody would have been arrested. Logic.
Because Police cannot break laws???
\\Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?\\ Never said\\ So??? You disavow you earlier claim?\\ Your "I *DO* deny..."???
\\No.
Seems like you do. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you agree that only some Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman could say something like that -- "I *DO* deny..."???
\\No. That was said by a sane lover of democracy.
Yeah.
NewSpeak talking one. ;-P
Which calling totalitarian rule "democracy" in DEMN-speak deceptive way.
Only a Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman like you would say the J6 insurrectionists had a "right" to overthrow the results of a fair democratic election. Just because they were sore losers.
Yep.
Same "Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman"s as Founding Fathers.
Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
Qtard: Same "Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman"s as Founding Fathers.
I thought they were the fathers founders? No?
This is proof of how dumb you are. The Founding Fathers overthrew monarchy. Yet you think the Founding Fathers would say (about the J6 insurrectionists who sought to overthrow the democracy they founded), "they are just like us". Well, you are a moron.
Idiot thinks the Founding Fathers could have been Nazis-lovers. Even though Naziism didn't exist in their time.
Qtard: Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
Militanz is a 'right" that the Left reserves for itself, exclusively.
‘Militanz’ as moralised political violence has been applied by the radical Left since the 1960s, but has scarcely been defined in academic literature. In the particular West German context, ‘Militanz’ has been restricted to attacks against objects rather than persons, in contradistinction to the terrorist attacks of the 1970s. The Autonomist movement has further theorised this concept through the caveat of the ‘three Antis’ (racism, sexism, capitalism), against which they consider their violence to be morally justified. This article offers a genealogy and definition of this 1990s Autonomist ‘Militanz’ by relying on extensive archival research and oral histories collected within the Hamburg Rote Flora Autonomist milieu. It then interrogates both this concept and the group's claims to moral authority by working within the Autonomists’ own conceptual definition to apply ‘Militanz’ categorically to a riot during the 2017 G20 summit. The article disentangles the various ideological factions who took part in this riot, and challenges media discourses that the Rote Flora Autonomists were responsible. However, it also concludes that ‘Militanz’ as a purely ‘Anti’ stance cannot legitimate moralised violence without offering any affirmative definition of appropriate political action, lest all violence become acceptable ‘Militanz’.
The Right must limit itself to extrajudicial abuses. It's not allowed to operate as the SuperEgo of a political party, like Antifa (and formerly the KKK) do/ did.
‘Militanz’ as a purely ‘Anti’ stance cannot legitimate moralised violence without offering any affirmative definition of appropriate political action, lest all violence become acceptable ‘Militanz’.
You know...anti-fascist, anti-racist, anti-Trumpist....
anti-Trumpism "affirms" pro-Neoliberalism. Biden-like corrupt oligarchs and controligarchs (ie. - George Soros).
The current counter-cultural discursive infrastructures of the right are also totally illegitimate (right wing blogs, etc.) and made into monsters (racist white-supremacist, facist, et al) in order to mask current criminal behaviours of minority protected political left-leaning racial identities by associating past injustices to a totally unrelated arc of modern political action forged with the sole purpose of legitimizing and seizing a monopoly on current and future political power.
\\This is proof of how dumb you are. The Founding Fathers overthrew monarchy.
Constitutional Monarchy.
One that gave Bill of Rights to the World. ;-P
But... totalitarian De-Ru-Pun DO NOT like people to have any rights... only "protection from violations", from UniParty, yes De-Ru-Pun? :-))))))
\\Yet you think the Founding Fathers would say (about the J6 insurrectionists who sought to overthrow the democracy they founded), "they are just like us". Well, you are a moron.
Yeah.
I am moron.(go, fake-quote it, moron Derpy)
Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
\\Qtard: Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
\\They didn't.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. United States Declaration of Independence - Wikiquote be.wikipedia.org › wiki › q:en:United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
Totalitarian Liar Derpy tryed to lie about Declaration of Independence.
And why *I* not surprised. Anymore.
Yawn.
And it will start screaming "I NEVER said it" too.
Qtard: only "protection from violations", from UniParty, yes De-Ru-Pun?
You ask your alter ego De-Ru-Pun? It probably says yes. Because it is a Totalitarian like you. Wants democracy in the United States overthrown. Thinks insurrection is a "human right" while the right to life isn't.
Qtard: I am moron.(go, fake-quote it, moron Derpy)
I agree. You are a moron. As is your alter ego Derpy.
Qtard: Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
Why you agree the US Constitution should be chucked, yes? It was written long ago by people who are long dead. And therefore the USA should get rid of it -- make donald tRump president for life.
Qtard: And it will start screaming "I NEVER said it" too.
No. Why would I do that when those are my words? I have never (and never will) deny my own words (as per your absurd lie). What you wrote isn't what the DOI says. Your quote proves it.
But the DOI was written long ago by people who have been dead for many years. So why do you cite them? When (according to you) they can't give an opinion about nowaday cases?
Qtard Quote: Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
You said we shouldn't listen to the Founders because they are long ago perished. How does that NOT mean you think the US should chuck the Constitution? Given that keeping it would be listening to them.
Or, are you going to disagree with yourself? That was a pretty stupid thing to say.
63 comments:
Joe Biden is going to retire a VERY wealthy man? He isn't going to have a lot of time to enjoy his wealth in his retirement. Given his age.
Is he doing it all for Hunter and Ashley?
Are you kidding? The guy only works an hour a day.
btw - Jill's doing a great job running the country.
....she's almost as good at signing Joe's name to Executive Orders as Joe's autopen.
Minus: Jill's doing a great job running the country.
Joe Biden is doing a great job running the country. Whoever your delusions want to give credit to... If you think a great job is being done, that must mean you are going to vote Biden in 2024?
WWIII in 2024! The NeoCons have taken over the Democratic Party! Woop-woop!
They have not.
I opposed bush's wars on Afghanistan and Iraq.
I also oppose Putin's war on Ukraine.
Democrats are the anti-war, not pro-war, Party.
Pro-putin trumpers like you try to spin your Putin-love as "anti-war".
So when was the last time a Democrat called for peace talks?
Nope... all they talk is regime change.
Yeah Hey, Yo Ho... Putin's GOT to GO!
You also want peace talks with Hamas? Israel says Hamas has to go -- you're opposed?
\\I opposed bush's wars on Afghanistan and Iraq.
\\I also oppose Putin's war on Ukraine.
And you do not see inner contradiction in between this two sentences?
Of course not, because you are I-D-I-O-T.
why would I oppose peace talks with Hamas?
You don't need to stop a war for peace talks. You just have to be able to state your conditions for ending the war.
Qtard: And you do not see inner contradiction in between this two sentences?
No. Because there isn't one.
Qtard: Of course not, because you are I-D-I-O-T.
Qtard can explain what it thinks the "inner contradiction" is? I doubt it. It could have explained already but didn't.
Minus: why would I oppose peace talks with Hamas?
Because Israel says they are going to dismantle Hamas? And Hamas wants "the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state in Israel's place".
Minus: You just have to be able to state your conditions for ending the war.
Everyone knows what each side wants. Israel wants to destroy Hamas and Hamas wants Israel to destroy Israel.
Similar to what Putin wants re Ukraine.
Correction: Hamas wants to destroy Israel. NOT "Hamas wants Israel to destroy Israel".
Everyone knows what each side wants. Israel wants to destroy Hamas and Hamas wants Israel to destroy Israel.
Since both things can't happen, the two parties shouldn't bother talking/ negotiating? Who knew>
You should sign up to work in the State Dept., Derv.
\\Anonymous Dervish Sanders said...
Qtard: And you do not see inner contradiction in between this two sentences?
\\No. Because there isn't one.
Even though to oppose to liliPutin's war... you'd need to go out on RedSquare?
With known results.
Are you ready to go out on a Red Square.
Of course you not. Cause. "Not you business", yes?
But anyway you claimed that you opposed to some shit... :-)))))
While you cannot oppose even to that shit that going out of your mouth non-stop. :-))))
Such an op-POSER you are. ;-P
\\Qtard can explain what it thinks the "inner contradiction" is? I doubt it. It could have explained already but didn't.
As citizen of USA -- you are free, and that is natural to oppose YOUR USA prezident.
But... NOT any other country prezident.
What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A.
Re "Qtard can explain what it thinks the "inner contradiction" is? I doubt it"...
Looks like I was right. Given that Qtard failed to explain. Just babbled some nonsense about me being required to go to Red Square to state my opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine.
Qtard has been to Red Square to state it's opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine? Is Qtard a Russian citizen? Or is Qtard an "op-POSER"?
\\Looks like I was right. Given that Qtard failed to explain.
Naaah.
You just failed to understand. And deliberataly it seems.
Because I doubt that simple fact that you CANNOT vote for or against liliPut -- is impossible to understand even to your miserable mind.
So... you just pretending non-understanding. ;-P
\\Just babbled some nonsense about me being required to go to Red Square to state my opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine.
Your opinions... they not imortant.
Who listening to em, anyway? Spiders that living with you in your basement?
:-)))
\\Qtard has been to Red Square to state it's opposition to Russia's war on Ukraine? Is Qtard a Russian citizen? Or is Qtard an "op-POSER"?
Yap.
That's why I DO NOT saying such a silly bullshit -- that I opposing something -- to which I have no influence what so ever.
Like USA politics. dRump or Bi-den.
While silly propaganda piglet trying to swipe me in own shit and blame me for that I don't do that. ;-P
What a silly-silly piglet. :-))))
Qtard: What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A.
Nobody does. Because "Rush'A" is imaginary. It only exists in Qtard's delusions.
Qtard: ...you CANNOT vote for or against liliPut.
Of course not. Because no such thing as "liliPut" exists. I CAN vote for Joe Biden. Joe Biden who is FOR helping Ukraine defend itself against Putin's invasion.
Qtard: Your opinions... they not imortant.
"Imortant"? I dunno what what means. I assume it is Qtardese?
If you mean "important", I never said my opinions are. You think yours are? "Important", I mean. If you wrote "imortant" and meant it... well, I dunno what that means. Like I said.
Qtard: Who listening to em, anyway? Spiders that living with you in your basement?
I don't live in a basement.
Qtard: Like USA politics. dRump or Bi-den.
Why don't you shuddup about it then?
btw, "propaganda piglet"? That's NewSpeak for someone who seeks out facts and rejects propaganda, yes?
\\Qtard: What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A.
\\Nobody does. Because "Rush'A" is imaginary. It only exists in Qtard's delusions.
And liliPut too? ;-P
So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things. :-))))
What a badass delusioned dude. :-))))
\\If you mean "important", I never said my opinions are.
But never the less... you like to pound on them.
And blame other for not supporting em.
What a miserly stupid schmuk you are. :-)))
\\I don't live in a basement.
And don't watching Star Trek. And do not fap on Pelosi poster. ;-P
\\Why don't you shuddup about it then?
Because you constantly accusing me in not showing enough admitration of that totally indifferent to me... things. ;-P
Why you, really? :-)))
\\btw, "propaganda piglet"? That's NewSpeak for someone who seeks out facts and rejects propaganda, yes?
:-)))))
I like you cringing this way.
Please cringe more. :-)))
They say that people who insist that everything be done a particular way (spelling Nazi's) are "anal". What do you think, Derv? Are they right?
Qtard: What that even could mean??? You have NO right to vote in Rush'A\\ Nobody does. Because "Rush'A" is imaginary. It only exists in Qtard's delusions\\ And liliPut too?
Right. Neither "Rush'A" nor "liliPut" exists.
Qtard: So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things.
No. Why would I do that?
Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos.
Qtard: \\If you mean "important", I never said my opinions are\\ But never the less... you like to pound on them.
Because we're discussing American politics and our opinions on them. If you don't want to do that you can leave.
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em.
Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be.
Qtard: What a miserly stupid schmuk you are.
Your alter ego? Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?
Qtard: \\I don't live in a basement\\ And don't watching Star Trek. And do not fap on Pelosi poster.
Me? No, I don't do any of those things. Maybe it's a list of your favorite activities?
Qtard: \\Why don't you shuddup about it then?\\ Because you constantly accusing me in not showing enough admitration of that totally indifferent to me... things.
Me? Or you're talking to one of your alter egos? If you mean me, that means you have showed some admiration for things I've said? Just not enough? But I never made any such accusation.
Qtard: Why you, really?
I have no idea why your alter ego is doing what you describe.
Qtard: \\btw, "propaganda piglet"? That's NewSpeak for someone who seeks out facts and rejects propaganda, yes?\\I like you cringing this way.
Now your alter ego is cringing?
Qtard: Please cringe more.
Qtard dunno what "cringe" means? Can it explain why it thinks I am (or its alter ego is) cringing?
Dervy, ever the master of feigned ignorance....
Master? :-))))
AFAIK... he just master of idiotic stubborness. :-)))))
"la-la-la, la-la-la, I dont' hear you, lal-la-la, la-la-la, I don't listen to you".
Or that is what your kids in USA doing, yes?
\\Right. Neither "Rush'A" nor "liliPut" exists.
Same as dRump? ;-P
\\Qtard: So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things.
\\No. Why would I do that?
:-))))))))
LOOK ABOVE ^^^^^^^^
Yet One Utterly Idiotic Counter-Factrual Rebuf og Derpy The Idiot. ;-P
\\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos.
Yeah?
And you can confirm that with QUOTE? ;-P
\\Because we're discussing American politics and our opinions on them. If you don't want to do that you can leave.
As I said...
Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
\\Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em.
\\Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be.
And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"? ;-P
\\Qtard: What a miserly stupid schmuk you are.
\\Your alter ego? Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?
And HOW it could be MY alter-ego???
Dare to EXPLAIN? ;-P
But you will not, you will only start talking with/among your alter-ego.
Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy? :-))))))
\\Me? No, I don't do any of those things. Maybe it's a list of your favorite activities?
And also... you are counter-factual liar. So... you just lied about not doing it. ;-P
While trying to reditrect it at some of your numerous alter-egos -- which doing bad things in your stead, yes? :-))))
\\Qtard: Please cringe more.
\\Qtard dunno what "cringe" means? Can it explain why it thinks I am (or its alter ego is) cringing?
Thanky for submitting to my request.
Well, not like you'd not do it anyway. ;-P
As true and natural I-D-I-O-T.
Qtard: \\Right. Neither "Rush'A" nor "liliPut" exists\\ Same as dRump?
Well, I guess I was wrong. Google says "LiLiPUT, initially known as Kleenex, were a Swiss punk rock band formed in Zürich in 1978".
So that is who you have been talking about?
I Googled "drump" and found a definition that says it is "the shit you take a day after anal intercourse".
That's what you've been talking about? Dumps you take after sex with your boyfriend?
Qtard: So, you stating your opposition to non-existing things\\ No. Why would I do that?\\ LOOK ABOVE...
Where? In the sky? Definitely not anywhere on this blog.
Qtard: \\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos\\ Yeah? And you can confirm that with QUOTE?
Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that.
Qtard: \\Because we're discussing American politics and our opinions on them. If you don't want to do that you can leave\\ As I said... Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
As you said to your alter ego?
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?
Whatever.
Qtard: What a miserly stupid schmuk you are\\ Your alter ego? Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?\\And HOW it could be MY alter-ego??? Dare to EXPLAIN?
Qtard dunno what "explain" means. You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?".
Qtard: But you will not, you will only start talking with/among your alter-ego.
I did explain. Qtard just failed to understand. Because it is an idiot. And, btw, "Qtard" is not my alter ego. I am referring to you.
Qtard: Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy?
Talking to your alter ego.
Qtard: \\Me? No, I don't do any of those things. Maybe it's a list of your favorite activities?\\ And also... you are counter-factual liar. So... you just lied about not doing it.
And how would you know? Far far away mind reading? Clairvoyance?
Qtard: While trying to reditrect it at some of your numerous alter-egos -- which doing bad things in your stead, yes?
No.
Qtard: Please cringe more\\ Qtard dunno what "cringe" means? Can it explain why it thinks I am (or its alter ego is) cringing?\\Thanky for submitting to my request.
Didn't.
Well, not like you'd not do it anyway.
I am not doing.
Qtard: As true and natural I-D-I-O-T.
Talking to your alter ego. Yet again.
\\Where? In the sky? Definitely not anywhere on this blog.
Because you have histerical blindness??? :-))))))
Toward OWN WORDS. :-)))))
Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
Damn madman you are. :-))))
\\Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that.
There was... but you was not able to see it.
Because of your histerical blindness? ;-P
Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else. Which is rediculous claim.
So, I just tryed to make it reasonable. ;-P
\\Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?
\\Whatever.
Yap.
Now you confirmed that "dunno" and "whatever" are also possible.
\\Qtard dunno what "explain" means. You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?".
Yap.
In your delusional mind IT can think so.
That babbling something unrelated is "explaining". ;-P
Because IT is an idiot. :-))))
\\I did explain. Qtard just failed to understand. Because it is an idiot. And, btw, "Qtard" is not my alter ego. I am referring to you.
Yap.
The same as earlier you screamed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
Now you trying to claim "I EXPLAINED"... about something you babbled directly from your delusional feverish mind.
But... continue-continue. It makes it only MOAR hilarious. ;-P
\\Qtard: Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy?
\\Talking to your alter ego.
:-))))))
Yeah. One posting here under nickname Dervish Sanders... oh, shi-i-i-it. :-)))))
What a delirious babbling -- calling itself MY alter-ego.
You trully are crazy, De-Ru-Pun. :-))))
But, continue-continue.
\\And how would you know? Far far away mind reading? Clairvoyance?
Yes.
Percieving Facts... its something like "clairvoyance"... to such an rotten brains idiot as De-Ru-Pun.
Abilty to see FACTS (like Sun rising in the morning) and make conclusion out of it, with using LOGIC... is just unimaginable, to such an idiot. :-))))
FACTS that visible to anyone, who would dare to read through this blog.
But... De-Ru-Pun have a histeric blindness -- so it unable to see texts here, as it admitted above. :-)))))
What a totally crazy junk.
\\Didn't
Cause you histerical blindness not allowed you to see it? ;-P
\\Qtard: As true and natural I-D-I-O-T.
\\Talking to your alter ego. Yet again.
Yap.
THAT specifical phrase.
Derpy the Idiot. SOMEHOW. Deduced that it was said to "alter-ego". :-))))
While some other, just next to it. Not. :-))))))))
What a idiotic pretender. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))
As I saying for a year alrady -- idiotic hypocrite and full of moronic pretence idiot. :-))))))
Qtard: Because you have histerical blindness??? Toward OWN WORDS.
No. I have "blindness" re words that were never written by me. Only seen by you in your delusions.
Qtard: Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?
Qtard: Damn madman you are.
I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Qtard: \\Same as you confirmed it with a quote when you've said (many times previously) that I was talking to an alleged alter ego of mine? Oh, no. You have never done that\\ There was... but you was not able to see it. Because of your histerical blindness?
Because I can't see your delusions.
Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else.
Lie. Given that I never have.
Qtard: Which is rediculous claim.
You realize this, yet you keep doing it.
Qtard: So, I just tryed to make it reasonable.
By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?
Qtard: And blame other for not supporting em\\ Say I disagree. Or agree. Whatever the case may be\\ And there can't be "dunno" or "whatever"?\\Whatever\\ Yap. Now you confirmed that "dunno" and "whatever" are also possible.
Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question.
Qtard: \\...You quoted the explanation. It is... "Because it doesn't understand why people would set up a blog and discuss politics?"\\ Yap. In your delusional mind IT can think so. That babbling something unrelated is "explaining".
Explaining you can't understand due to your idiocy. Well, NMP.
Qtard: Because IT is an idiot. :-))))
Talking to your alter ego.
Qtard: The same as earlier you screamed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
Lie. That never happened.
Qtard: Now you trying to claim "I EXPLAINED"... about something you babbled directly from your delusional feverish mind.
Oh. Talking to your alter ego again. Describing how you arrive at your "explainations".
Qtard: Isn't it, Fuzzy Brains Multi-Person Derpy?\\ Talking to your alter ego\\ Yeah. One posting here under nickname Dervish Sanders...
You were addressing "Derpy". At first I thought you were referring to me, but this "Derpy" is saying things I never wrote. So you must be talking about yourself. Blaming an alter ego to call "Derpy". Logic.
Qtard: You trully are crazy, De-Ru-Pun.
"De-Ru-Pi" and "De-Ru-Pun"... Both of these alter egos of yours are truly crazy.
Qtard: \\And how would you know? Far far away mind reading? Clairvoyance?\\ Yes. Percieving Facts... its something like "clairvoyance"... to such an rotten brains idiot as De-Ru-Pun.
You didn't cite any facts, just delusions. But I agree with you about your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun". It's brains as definitely rotten.
Qtard: Abilty to see FACTS (like Sun rising in the morning) and make conclusion out of it, with using LOGIC... is just unimaginable, to such an idiot.
Qtard saw a fact about someone "fapping" on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. But mistook me for one of its alter egos. Gotcha.
Qtard: FACTS that visible to anyone, who would dare to read through this blog.
No. Nobody can see you fapping on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. Did see you admit to doing that though.
Qtard: But... De-Ru-Pun have a histeric blindness -- so it unable to see texts here, as it admitted above.
I did see your alter ego admit that.
Qtard: \\Didn't\\Cause you histerical blindness not allowed you to see it?
Because I can't see your delusions.
\\No. I have "blindness" re words that were never written by me. Only seen by you in your delusions.
But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES??? :-)))))
Yap. You are definitely crazy junk.
\\Qtard: Well, not it explains it -- while you scream "I NEVER said it" so often.
\\No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
"Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."? ;-P
You really are crazy junk.
\\Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.
\\Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?
And you can CONFIRM that *I* demonstrate "this behavior"??? :-)))))
Naaah.
Because that is just feverish delusion of a crazy junk. ;-P
\\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Names. Please give names!
So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos. ;-P
Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd? :-)))))
\\Because I can't see your delusions.
Yap.
Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders. :-)))))
That is... "delusions". Visible to anyone. Except Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun. ;-P
\\Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else.
\\Lie. Given that I never have.
JUST ABOVE.
I'll repeat it here... as you showed INABILITY to scroll back the text to re-read it... might be because of that histerical blindness...
Here.
\\No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often.
I made it in bold -- to be even more easily to see. ;-P
That is -- what you say about PERFECT QUOTES of your own words.
Like about this excerpt -- "I *DO* deny..." about which you whining that you "I NEVER said it"... though you said, and NEVER admitted it was mistake... only Doubled-Down on SAME SHITTY claims.
But... you will claim that NEVER HAPPEN. AGAIN!
Cause you are crazy junk.
with totally disfunctional brain.
That do not allow to you to see FACTS. :-)))))
Like one that Sun rising in the morning. And dRump is not in jail. And quite probably will became your next POTUS. AGAIN! ;-P
\\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?
Yep.
In a post made from account Dervish Sanders. ;-P
\\Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question.
Yeah.
Because I am All-knowing. And All-wise. And can answer to ANY question. :-))))
But... that is what Crazy Junk Derpy thinks about itself. Probably.
That's why it trying to project his shit on me.
Well, anyway.
You just said "Whatever" itself.
Does it mean that that was a LIE too. ;-P
And you just admitted being liar -- by YOU OWN this discretion?
Or THIS all claim "Or lying" was a LIE?
Cause you know.
In LOGIC. There is MAIN RULE -- tertium non datur. Logical claim can be either TRUE. Or FALSE. And no other.
And two logical claims. About SAME thing. Cannot be one TRUE. And other FALSE.
Like Sky is blue. And Sky is NOT blue.
\\Explaining you can't understand due to your idiocy. Well, NMP.
Non-explaining. That gives no clues. Do not refer to any facts. Do not contain any logic.
Just described state of mind of one certain Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
Of course I cannot understand such crazy babbling. I am not psychiatrist. ;-P
\\Qtard: The same as earlier you screamed "I NEVER said it"... about YOUR OWN DEMN WORDS.
\\Lie. That never happened.
What "never happened"??? :-)))))
Your screams "I NEVER said it"????
Here.
Google covers your DEMN lies, it seems.
But there is Bing. ;-P
http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fpoliticaltealeaves.blogspot.com%2F+"I+NEVER+said+it"
\\Oh. Talking to your alter ego again. Describing how you arrive at your "explainations".
Certainly... that is what you do with your alter-egos.
That's why this silly projections.
But you continue-continue.
I am interested in listening more details about your feverish delusions. ;-P
Madmans are not so available, to observe their behavior in vivo. :-))))
\\You were addressing "Derpy". At first I thought you were referring to me, but this "Derpy" is saying things I never wrote. So you must be talking about yourself. Blaming an alter ego to call "Derpy". Logic.
You Derpy do not see own words. Because of histerical blindness.
Or because of some of your alter-egos have written that words -- that's why you (one of alter-egos who are in charge now) cannot recognize that words as yours?
Even when I copy-paste it with header -- that that is excerpt from post of certain someone Dervish Sanders? :-)))))
Yap.
Cause you are Crazy Junk... De-Ru-Pun. :-))))
\\"De-Ru-Pi" and "De-Ru-Pun"... Both of these alter egos of yours are truly crazy.
Derpy admitted that talking with me inflicted TWO MORE alter-egos in its brain? ;-P
:-))))))))
\\You didn't cite any facts, just delusions. But I agree with you about your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun". It's brains as definitely rotten.
Yap.
"Delusions". Which exist in Real World -- like Sun rising in the morning.
Such -- "delusions"? ;-P
You are crazy. Go admit it. :-))))
\\Qtard: Abilty to see FACTS (like Sun rising in the morning) and make conclusion out of it, with using LOGIC... is just unimaginable, to such an idiot.
\\Qtard saw a fact about someone "fapping" on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. But mistook me for one of its alter egos. Gotcha.
:-))))))
You are self-revealing, derp. ;-P
\\Qtard: FACTS that visible to anyone, who would dare to read through this blog.
\\No. Nobody can see you fapping on a poster of Nancy Pelosi. Did see you admit to doing that though.
You admitting that that was bullseye -- that you have such fantasies. ;-P
Because... I have said many thing here.
But you showed that you do not remember em.
Even if it was in cimment from yesterday. Even if that is YOUR OWN DAMN words.
But this thing... you seems like remembering. How? Why?
If that is not bullseye. ;-P
\\Qtard: But... De-Ru-Pun have a histeric blindness -- so it unable to see texts here, as it admitted above.
\\I did see your alter ego admit that.
In your delusion. And therefore you cannot QUOTE it? ;-P
Or... sorry, I need to ask you in your DEMN NewSpeak.
You "saw" it in your inner "true reality"... but as that "true reality" have no connections with common to all us Reality... you cannot copy-paste it, and give QUOTE. Yes, De-Ru-Pun? :-))))))
\\Qtard: \\Didn't\\Cause you histerical blindness not allowed you to see it?
\\Because I can't see your delusions.
Yeah.
You CANNOT come to your computer. Open in browser this blog. And reread YOUR OWN comments you have written...
because your alter-egos FORBID you? ;-P
Well... that is known effect of muilty-personality -- memories of alter-egos are usually blocked, to support that illusion that "somebody else did it".
Which are in accordance with behavior of certain someone posting under nicjname Dervish Sanders here.
Well, as well as pretending being some other person. Some honorary judge.
Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???
Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?
Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?
Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights".
Qtard: Your mind is so DEMN screwed... that it blocks your vision even.\\ Is that what's going on with you? Though, instead of recognizing this behavior in yourself, you are trying to thrug it off onto me?\\ And you can CONFIRM that *I* demonstrate "this behavior"?
No. Sorry, I should have said that your mind is so damn screwed that it causes you to see "quotes" that were never made. Like when you claimed I was "stating ... opposition to non-existing things". Which never happened. Yet you somehow "saw" that did.
Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!
You don't know your own name? Amnesia?
Qtard: So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos.
I dunno. You tell me which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos.
Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?
Maybe. I dunno.
Qtard: \\Because I can't see your delusions\\ Yap. Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders.
You think my comments are your delusions? That's strange.
Qtard: That is... "delusions". Visible to anyone. Except Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" can't see comments? Is De-Ru-Pun blind?
Qtard: Well, I properly stated -- why and HOW I came to conclusion about your alter-egos -- you often claiming that something that YOU said... is said by someone else\\ Lie. Given that I never have\\ JUST ABOVE\\ I'll repeat it here... as you showed INABILITY to scroll back the text to re-read it... might be because of that histerical blindness... Here\\ No. The reason is because you write lies about "what Derpy really mean" so often\\ I made it in bold -- to be even more easily to see\\ That is -- what you say about PERFECT QUOTES of your own words.
I do not. Never have. Never will.
Qtard: Like about this excerpt -- "I *DO* deny..." about which you whining that you "I NEVER said it"... though you said, and NEVER admitted it was mistake... only Doubled-Down on SAME SHITTY claims.
Lie. I never said I do deny anyone their rights.
Qtard: But... you will claim that NEVER HAPPEN. AGAIN!
Right. Because it didn't.
Qtard: Cause you are crazy junk.
Your alter ego? Because it keeps making the same false claim over and over? I agree.
Qtard: with totally disfunctional brain. That do not allow to you to see FACTS. Like one that Sun rising in the morning.
Lie. I never said the sun doesn't rise in the morning.
Qtard: And dRump is not in jail. And quite probably will became your next POTUS. AGAIN! ;-P
Lie. I never said tRump is in jail. He might be the next potus, but I doubt it. More likely he is going to prison. But he is not there now.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders.
Never happened.
Qtard: \\Or lying. Which is what you usually do. Like when you write "dunno". That is usually a lie. You use it when you want to dodge a question\\ Yeah. Because I am All-knowing. And All-wise. And can answer to ANY question.
Lie. I wasn't talking about ANY question. Questions you posed. For example -- about gay people and a woman's right to bodily autonomy. You said you had no idea what it was all about. Then you later admitted you dislike that Democrats stand up for the rights of these people. Because they never had any rights and could previously be freely discriminated against.
Qtard: But... that is what Crazy Junk Derpy thinks about itself. Probably.
I think so. Your alter ego "Crazy Junk Derpy" probably does think that about itself.
Qtard: That's why it trying to project his shit on me.
But you and your alter ego -- they are both you.
\\But you and your alter ego -- they are both you.
And you can provide some firm evidances of it? ;-P
Yawn.
Naaah.
You can produce confirmations of your morinity only, Your Moronity Most Squiky DEMN I-D-I-O-T Derpy. :-)))))))
\\Because they never had any rights and could previously be freely discriminated against.
Yap.
Being humans.
Having immanent Human Rights...
but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders.
\\Never happened.
Counter-Factual. As Ever!
\\Blogger Dervish Sanders said...
...
\\Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.
\\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos.
JUST IN THIS THREAD. ;-P
\\Lie. I never said tRump is in jail. He might be the next potus, but I doubt it. More likely he is going to prison. But he is not there now.
Famous Derpy's counter-factual denyes -- inner contradiction IN THE NEXT SENTENCE.
\\Lie. I never said the sun doesn't rise in the morning.
You said that you (do not) believe facts on a whim.
That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality.
SAME as dRump not being in jail.
But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it. ;-P
\\Your alter ego? Because it keeps making the same false claim over and over? I agree.
False?
While confirmed with FACT "false"?
NewSpeak "false"? ;-P
\\Lie. I never said I do deny anyone their rights.
And you wasn't say "I *DO* deny..."???
What a blatant lie. ;-P
But you are not Completely Morionic Obviously Anti-Factual LIAR Derpy not for nopthing. :-))))))
\\Qtard: \\Because I can't see your delusions\\ Yap. Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders.
\\You think my comments are your delusions? That's strange.
YET ONE confirmation.
That Reality is "delusion" to it, to Derpy Sanders. ;-P
\\Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?
\\Maybe. I dunno.
Uncertain about what of your alter-egos was in charge that time?
Natural thing for a split-personality person. ;-P
YET ONE confirmation.
\\Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!
\\You don't know your own name? Amnesia?
Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
As it's easy to see to anyone -- CORRECT quote are:""
\\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts.
Names. Please give names!
So I could destinguish -- which of your alter-egos talking about which of your alter-egos. ;-P
Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd? :-)))))
""
And do not leave place for such crazy conclusions.
But... Derpy is crazy... that's why it writing such a crazy thing.
It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it. :-))))
All in FULL accordance with facts.
Yawn.
Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder. :-))))
\\No. Sorry, I should have said that your mind is so damn screwed that it causes you to see "quotes" that were never made. Like when you claimed I was "stating ... opposition to non-existing things". Which never happened. Yet you somehow "saw" that did.
:-))))))
\\Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?
\\Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights".
Because QUOTES -- it's REFERENCE.
And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
You CONFIRMED it... itself.
That you denied "having such right" -- which in relation to Human Rights -- which ARE unse\verable -- can ony mean that your "I *DO* deny..." means denial of humans to be Human.
Which is Nazi-trait. SAME what nazi DID with Jews -- denyed em having Human Rights.
\\Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???
\\Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?
Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard". ;-P
YET ONE confirmation of deep rotting of Derpy's brains....
Yawn.
Qtard: And you can provide some firm evidances of it?
You provided "firm evidences" that I have multiple personalities? Like a diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?
Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only, Your Moronity Most Squiky DEMN I-D-I-O-T Derpy.
Talking to your alter ego?
Qtard: Being humans. Having immanent Human Rights...
Oh, so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?
Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
In accordance with reality. Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya.
A fact that likely makes the Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING Qtard very happy. Why it so strongly opposes such people (who it hates) from having their rights protected.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!
NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?
Qtard: What a badass delusioned dude.\\OK. You're definitely talking to one of your alter egos\\ JUST IN THIS THREAD.
Like someone suffering delusions (as you clearly are) would know it.
Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it.
Quote me. You won't. Because I never said that.
Qtard: False? While confirmed with FACT "false"?
No.
Qtard: NewSpeak "false"?
No.
Qtard: \\Lie. I never said I do deny anyone their rights\\ And you wasn't say "I *DO* deny..."???
Partial out-of-context quote.
Qtard: What a blatant lie.
Yeah. You lied blatantly about that partial out-of-context quote. And you keep lying about it. Over and over and over.
Qtard: \\Because I can't see your delusions\\ Yap. Like comments posted here under nickname Dervish Sanders\\ You think my comments are your delusions? That's strange\\ YET ONE confirmation. That Reality is "delusion" to it, to Derpy Sanders.
Non confirmation.
\\Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?\\ Maybe. I dunno\\ Uncertain about what of your alter-egos was in charge that time?
No. I was uncertain about which of YOUR alter-egos was in charge that time.
Qtard: Natural thing for a split-personality person.
Like you?
Qtard: YET ONE confirmation.
That you're crazy? I think so.
Qtard: \\I agree with you about your alter ego. It is totally nuts. Names. Please give names!\\ You don't know your own name? Amnesia?\\ Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
Yours?
Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?
Confirmed. Qtard calls one of its alter egos "Nobody" and another one it calls "republiturd". That's in addition to the alter egos "De-Ru-Pi", "De-Ru-Pun" and "Derpy".
Qtard: But... Derpy is crazy... that's why it writing such a crazy thing.
Agreed. Your alter ego "Derpy" is crazy.
Qtard: It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it.
Who is going to scream that? One of your alter egos?
Qtard: All in FULL accordance with facts.
No.
Qtard: Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder.
If you say so. I don't know anything about your mental illnesses except what I've witnessed here.
Qtard: "Lies" that CONFIRMED with Copy-Pasted QUOITES. Like "I *DO* deny..."?\\ Partial out-of-context quotes. One you previously faked by adding "me their rights"\\ Because QUOTES -- it's REFERENCE.
Yeah. Proof that you fake them.
Qtard: And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
You know too. But lie about it anyway.
Qtard: You CONFIRMED it... itself. That you denied "having such right" -- which in relation to Human Rights -- which ARE unse\verable -- can ony mean that your "I *DO* deny..." means denial of humans to be Human.
No.
Qtard: Which is Nazi-trait. SAME what nazi DID with Jews -- denyed em having Human Rights.
Saying there is no "sore loser right" to violently overturn the results of a legitimate democratic election is in no way the same as Nazis murdering Jews. That is pure stupidity. And offensive.
Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???\\ Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?\\ Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard".
Now your alter egos have alter egos? What's next? Your alter ego's alter ego is going to have an alter ego?
Qtard: YET ONE confirmation of deep rotting of Derpy's brains....
Your alter ego's brain and your brain too. They are the same brain.
\\Dervish Sanders said...
Qtard: And you can provide some firm evidances of it?
\\You provided "firm evidences" that I have multiple personalities? Like a diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?
Your own words here.
Yawn.
Like THIS words -- DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist. ;-P
\\Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only, Your Moronity Most Squiky DEMN I-D-I-O-T Derpy.
\\Talking to your alter ego?
And... HOW? ;-P
Try to build some chain of conclusion, that could make it plausible... at least on surface.
But, naaah.
You CAN'T.
Cause you are I-D-I-O-T. :-))))))
\\Qtard: Being humans. Having immanent Human Rights...
\\Oh, so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?
Yap.
Non-democratic ones. Where they do what totalitarian Derpy likes -- "protection from vioalations" -- just call homosexuality a "violation"... and feel free itself to "protect" people from it. ;-P
INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
\\Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
\\In accordance with reality. Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya.
Yap.
Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
By declaring that they "did nit have em to begin with". And etc.
Totalitarian scumbags of all of the World (like that same liliPut) DO ABSOLUTELY THE SAME as you Derpy -- they "*DO* deny..." people having "immanent and unseverable Human Rights".
And even SAME. Word-to-word SAME.
That is liliPutin's talking point "see, their Human Rights do not protect em"... means, better go seek protection from it, from liliPut.
It talking to own people. And advertise to all of the World.
For people to fall on their knees, and to beg Mighty liliPut... to protect em.
Give em "Protection from violations". INSTEAD of Human Rights.
\\Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ Yep. In a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!
\\NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?
Oh?
Yet one word from NewSpeak you decided to reveal to me.
As an expert in NewSpeak.
You say you don't know.
But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
\\Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it.
\\Quote me. You won't. Because I never said that.
Easy-Peasy.
You said "I believe in facts".
But you claiming not saying it? ;-P
Because you "never said it"? :-))))))
\\Partial out-of-context quote.
But you ALREADY showed that you know that CONTEXT perfectly well.
Now that is just a sheer lie. ;-P
YET ONE self-revealing of being blatant counter-factual liar. :-)))))
\\Yeah. You lied blatantly about that partial out-of-context quote. And you keep lying about it. Over and over and over.
Yap...
"partial out-of-context quote" that was repeated many-many times.
And you many-many times showed that your PERFECTLY know what that quote refering to -- your denial of people to have thair IMMANENT Human Rigths.
So now you decided to cover it with more denials and blatant lies. :-))))))
Continue-continue like that. ;-P
\\\\Qtard: Is it that Nobody? Or maybe Republiturd?\\ Maybe. I dunno\\ Uncertain about what of your alter-egos was in charge that time?
\\No. I was uncertain about which of YOUR alter-egos was in charge that time.
I undestand your confusion.
Having such unsteady choir in one's head... you seeing talking with me like with yet one of your alter-egos, am I right? ;-P
Well, hardly you'd be able to confirm it in your delusonal state, in a straight way... but no biggy, I am smart enough to devise it from your junky response too. :-)))))
\\\\ Yet one confirmation of Histerical Blindness.
\\Yours?
Like that is *I* saying that I do not see, do not remember written even up above in under the same post thread.... :-))))))
\\Qtard: It will start screaming in a jiffy -- that is "NEVER" did writ it... because one of its moronioc alter-ego did it.
\\Who is going to scream that? One of your alter egos?
\\Qtard: All in FULL accordance with facts.
\\No.
Asked such a sneak question... but then started screaming "No!" right away.
So self-revealingly. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Now it confirmed enough -- that Derpy are crazy junk with split-personality disorder.
\\If you say so. I don't know anything about your mental illnesses except what I've witnessed here.
Yap.
You are perfect witness of your mental illness.
That's why I so inteested to know every tiny detail of it.
Like names of your alter-egos. And etc.
Even if it quite hard to make you to spill that bean. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you KNOW to what YOUR words that "I *DO* deny..." refering.
\\You know too. But lie about it anyway.
Well.
You just ADMITTED... what you tryed to DENY just above.
Which mean that was blatant lies... that, about "partial out of context" quiting. ;-P
And.... where is MY lie???
I just CONFIRMED that you denyed "having such rights" - means, you like that Nazis, tryed to deny humans being Human.
That's all.
\\Saying there is no "sore loser right" to violently overturn the results of a legitimate democratic election is in no way the same as Nazis murdering Jews. That is pure stupidity. And offensive.
Historical hint: Nazi did not start from murders too.
First they started calling em "pests". You call "republiturds/magaturds".
Then started blaming em for anything and everything. So do you.
Then, declared that there is no place for em to go around other people -- and that is what you declared here about "J6 insurrectionists"... that, SOMEHOW for them to go by public streets, being present in public places, going into public buildinga... is SOMEHOW is a CRIME.
And to cover for that... you started denying em Human Rights.
Means, yeah, you are half-way to what Nazis did to Jews.
But do we need to wait for you to make another half-step???
\\Qtard: But can be Ctrl-Fed and copy-pasted to you AGAIN, as QUOTES???\\ Qtard thinks it can Ctrl-F it's delusions?\\ Obviously... that is about Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard".
\\Now your alter egos have alter egos? What's next? Your alter ego's alter ego is going to have an alter ego?
You tell.
You seems so KNOWLEDGIBLE.
And so EXPERIENCED.
;-P
\\But you and your alter ego -- they are both you.
Yes?
Then why you deny that earlier written by you... I mean by your body, words -- are not yours? ;-P
Qtard: Your own words here.
Ok. So you can't. Thanky for admitting you lied.
Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist.
I haven't.
Qtard: You can produce confirmations of your morinity only ... Derpy\\ Talking to your alter ego?\\ And... HOW? Try to build some chain of conclusion, that could make it plausible...
You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself. Certainly you could not be talking to me, given I have exhibited any moronity.
Qtard: ...so that's why in some countries a person can be put to death for being a homosexual?\\Non-democratic ones. Where they do what totalitarian Derpy likes ... just call homosexuality a "violation"... and feel free itself to "protect" people from it.
But homosexuality isn't a "violation". Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed.
Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
You say.
Qtard: but... not having em, in accordance with Totalitarian Human Rights OPPOSING DEMN Derpy.
Your alter ego again. You're always blaming it for your totalitarian anti-human-rights proclivities.
Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude.
Qtard: By declaring that they "did nit have em to begin with". And etc.
But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them.
Qtard: Totalitarian scumbags of all of the World (like that same liliPut) DO ABSOLUTELY THE SAME as you Derpy -- they "*DO* deny..." people having "immanent and unseverable Human Rights".
Talking about your alter ego Derpy. Though you partially quote me again. Add lies to that partial quote. To suggest that is what I meant. When it is not. Because you are a heinous liar.
Qtard: That is liliPutin's talking point "see, their Human Rights do not protect em"... means, better go seek protection from it, from liliPut.
Lie. Gay people are discriminated against IN LAW in Russia. Putin does not protect them.
Qtard: For people to fall on their knees, and to beg Mighty liliPut... to protect em.
Lie. He doesn't.
Qtard: Give em "Protection from violations". INSTEAD of Human Rights.
Neither.
Qtard: \\By imagining an alter ego of yours said it?\\ in a post made from account Dervish Sanders\\ Never happened\\ Counter-Factual. As Ever!\\NewSpeak? "Counter factual" means "factual"?\\ Oh? Yet one word from NewSpeak you decided to reveal to me.
You revealed to me. By calling my factual comment "counter-factual".
Qtard: As an expert in NewSpeak.
What you're claiming to be?
Qtard: You say you don't know. But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
By you? Yeah, I think so.
Qtard: That, that Sun rising in the morning -- is a fact of Reality. SAME as dRump not being in jail. But you claimed that it doesn't matter... just because you don't want to believe it\\ Quote me. You won't...\\ Easy-Peasy. You said "I believe in facts".
That isn't a quote of me saying "it doesn't matter because I don't want to believe it".
"Want" has nothing to do with it. Being a fact (or not being a fact) is all that matters.
Qtard: But you claiming not saying it?
Your fake quote about me not wanting to believe? And that not wanting to believe facts allows me to dismiss them? No, I never said anything like that. Proven by your inability to give a quote.
Qtard: Because you "never said it"?
Right. I didn't say it. You did. Another of "what Derpy really mean" lies.
\\Qtard: Your own words here.
\\Ok. So you can't. Thanky for admitting you lied.
As always.
Hiserical blindness.
And moronity.
:-)))))))
\\Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist.
\\I haven't.
Yes?
Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How?"???
Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed. ;-P
Or... you "never have written" it? :-))))))
That was some other your alter-ego? ;-P
\\You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself.
Logically you said.
And you DO KNOW what LOGIC is?
And WHY what you said can be called "logical"?
Or... you are just a moron, who trying to use words it do not get, in pretentious try to "look smart"? ;-P
"Hypocrisy -- that is tribute vice paying to virtue".
\\Certainly you could not be talking to me, given I have exhibited any moronity.
Why not???
I am tolerant to a fools. ;-P
Find em... fascinating even.
\\But homosexuality isn't a "violation".
Neither having white skin. Or having own, even if opposite to your political views.
But when it did stop you???
\\Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed.
Moronic projection.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights.
\\You say.
Well.
YOU have said that there is some gays killed.
And now you trying to disavow ONW WORDS?
AGAIN??? :-)))))
\\Your alter ego again. You're always blaming it for your totalitarian anti-human-rights proclivities.
That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights? ;-P
\\Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights.
\\That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude.
I'm glad that you admitting it is bad thing... for very least.
Even though keep clutching at your histerical blindness that that is not you, what doing it.
\\But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them.
Same as J6 "insurrectionists"? ;-P
\\Talking about your alter ego Derpy. Though you partially quote me again. Add lies to that partial quote. To suggest that is what I meant. When it is not. Because you are a heinous liar.
Yeah.
Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...
And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?
:-))))))
\\Lie. Gay people are discriminated against IN LAW in Russia. Putin does not protect them.
Thjose who pander to it -- like most of his propagandists, who are open and even proud gay -- he do.
That is those who are opposing him politicly, he not.
That is what totalitarian "protection" is about.
But whom I explaining it to. :-)))))
\\Qtard: As an expert in NewSpeak.
\\What you're claiming to be?
On what base? This claim?
On FIGURELY cutted out of context quote?
:-))))))
\\Qtard: You say you don't know. But that was said in NewSpeak too, isn't it?
\\By you? Yeah, I think so.
YOU explained meaning of that word. In NewSpeak.
And now you trying to turn that table and point finger at me -- perfectly what a heinous liar would do. ;-P
\\That isn't a quote of me saying "it doesn't matter because I don't want to believe it".
Hah.
You -- liar. Should tell such Truth???
Whom are kidding???? :-)))))
Liars -- DO NOT tell Truth. They trying to AVOID it. And pack in some deceptive camuflage.
Since -- your claim "I believe in facts" -- which is moronic. And counter-factual. IMPOSSIBLE claim.
Because there is NO way how one can believe or not believe in facts...
Because facts just IS. And NOTHING will change from anybody beliieveing or disbelieving em.
\\"Want" has nothing to do with it. Being a fact (or not being a fact) is all that matters.
Believing -- it's HUMAN's ability ONLY. Depends on WANTING.
And absolutely INDEPENDEDNT from any facts.
Credo ipso absurdum.
As that. That is YET ONE of YOUR moronic lies.
\\Your fake quote about me not wanting to believe?
What "faked quote"???
That you said "I believe in facts"?
And said it many time.
And showed utter stubborness in doubling-down on it.
So what??? Now you disavowing it? You no more "believe in facts"???
Naaah.
That is just a lie.
\\And that not wanting to believe facts allows me to dismiss them? No, I never said anything like that. Proven by your inability to give a quote.
You BEHAVED like that.
Your DEEDS are FACTS.
Your mere WORDS -- NOT. ;-P
Especially as you confirmed many-many time that your nothing else but hypoctical and idiotic liar -- one lying too obviously, trying to say "I never said it" about OWN WORDS JUST SAID. :-)))))
Which is... hilarious as Hell.
Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist\\ I haven't\\ Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How???
If you went to one. He would diagnose you. That is how it works.
Qtard: Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed.
You are only revealing your delusions. You dunno anything about my confidential health information.
Qtard: Or... you "never have written" it?
I never wrote anything about my confidential health information. Or being "disturbed" about you revealing it. Because you know nothing.
Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?
It was something that didn't happen.
Qtard: \\You're the one constantly displaying moronity here. It is logical to assume you are talking to yourself\\ Logically you said. And you DO KNOW what LOGIC is?
Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not.
Qtard: And WHY what you said can be called "logical"?
Right above. The moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it.
Qtard: Or... you are just a moron, who trying to use words it do not get, in pretentious try to "look smart"?
That's you. And you've failed spectacularly.
Qtard: \\Certainly you could not be talking to me, given that I have not exhibited any moronity\\ Why not???
I have not exhibited any moronity.
Qtard: I am tolerant to a fools. Find em... fascinating even.
So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care.
Qtard: \\But homosexuality isn't a "violation"\\ Neither having white skin. Or having own, even if opposite to your political views.
Of course not.
Qtard: But when it did stop you???
I dunno what you're talking about. What do you think I am not stopped from?
Qtard: \\Obviously that is what you believe. And your totalitarian alter ego "Derpy" wants to see people guilty of this "violation" killed\\ Moronic projection.
Logical conclusion. Not projection. I don't want gay people killed.
Qtard: INSTEAD of ensuring Human Rights\\ You say\\ YOU have said that there is some gays killed. And now you trying to disavow ONW WORDS?
Why would I disavow true words?
Qtard: AGAIN???
Impossible. I'd have to have done it at least once. In order to do it "again".
Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
Lie. I never said that.
Qtard: \\Immanent Human Rights isn't protecting gay people from receiving the death penalty in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Chechnya\\ Because TOTALITARIANs, like you Derpy, DO INFRINGE people's Human Rights\\ That alter ego of yours "Derpy" is a bad dude\\ I'm glad that you admitting it is bad thing... for very least.
But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments.
Qtard: Even though keep clutching at your histerical blindness that that is not you, what doing it.
Impossible. I can't "keep" doing something I have never done before.
Qtard: \\But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them\\ Same as J6 "insurrectionists"?
Depends on what "rights" you're talking about. Not imaginary "rights" Qtard made up and called "immanent".
Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...
Of course they do.
Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?
Never said.
\\Qtard: ...DEMN self-revealing -- that you have asigned to you psichiatrist\\ I haven't\\ Why then you asked such a self-revealing question "...diagnosis from my psychiatrist? Where? How???
\\If you went to one. He would diagnose you. That is how it works.
What for???
Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
Means... do you have such symptoms???
Like uncontrollable moronic lying? ;-P
Like spontaneous lose of memory? ;-P
Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal? ;-P
\\Qtard: Looks like you are genuinely disturbed, about your health confidential information being revealed.
\\You are only revealing your delusions. You dunno anything about my confidential health information.
See! :-))))))
Genuinely disturbed.
While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example.
Same time to known that someone is mad.
Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
Because mad thinking they are normal. :-))))))))))
And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR. :-)))))))))
\\Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?
\\It was something that didn't happen.
Yep.
YET ONE symptom of being crazy. :-)))))
\\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not.
Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
Only refering to... as your favorite "listen to me, I'm expert"s???
:-))))))))))))
YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT. ;-P
\\Right above. The moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it.
I see a symptoms in your behavior.
And that is not some flu or something... which really cnnot be seen through texts.
But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. ;-P
So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind. ;-P
\\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly.
Oh, yeah.
And you can give QUOTES?
Or... describe it with your own words... for at least.
I mean in details. Like, when? And with what exactly? ;-P
But naaah, in your mental condintion, writing anything concise like that -- is impossible. :-))))
\\I have not exhibited any moronity.
Yes-yes-yes.
If only it'll make you more cooperative... patient. ;-P
\\So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care.
Writing in.
YET ONE symptom -- low empaty.
Tch-tch-tch. ;-P
\\I dunno what you're talking about. What do you think I am not stopped from?
Problems with understanding even symple texts.
YET ONE symptom.
\\Logical conclusion. Not projection. I don't want gay people killed.
YOU started talking about gay people killing.
Why???
Have such urges? Voices talking to you you must kill em?
\\Why would I disavow true words?
Delusional bullshit?
Yeah, you do not need... if your screws gone loose. :-)))))
\\Impossible. I'd have to have done it at least once. In order to do it "again".
Tch-tch-tch.
You need to have memories... of that previous times.
But you, with your behavior showing that you have lacunas in your memories.
Very often too.
Like about your previous posts. From day ago even.
YET ONE symptom.
See...
\\Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
\\Lie. I never said that.
LIKE here.
\\But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments.
YET ONE symptom.
False memories. Envisioning people talking anti-gay.
That is symprom of having some maniacal ideas.
Tch-tch-tch. :-))))))
\\Impossible. I can't "keep" doing something I have never done before.
Yap.
YET ONE symptom -- sponataneous lose of memories. ;-P
\\Qtard: \\But their human rights are immanent. Means they can't be separated from them\\ Same as J6 "insurrectionists"?
\\Depends on what "rights" you're talking about. Not imaginary "rights" Qtard made up and called "immanent".
Oh, yeah.
Human Rights is "imagiary"... to a Nazi madman De-Ru-Pun... one who write under nick Dervish Sanders here. ;-P :-)))))
Go. Say it now. That I talkin with/about MY alter-ego.
CONFIRM that you are crazy as hell. ;-P
\\Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...
\\Of course they do.
Then... their rights was violated -- by YOU.
Who said that they HAVE NO RIGHT to go by the public streets, enter public buildings, ASK public servant legitimate questions. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?
\\Never said.
So??? You disavow you earlier claim?
Your "I *DO* deny..."???
And you agree that only some Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman could say something like that -- "I *DO* deny..."??? ;-P
Qtard: What for???
Being nuts.
Qtard: Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
Yes, but you are not normal.
Qtard: Means... do you have such symptoms???
No.
Qtard: Like uncontrollable moronic lying?
One of your symptoms.
Qtard: Like spontaneous lose of memory?
Another of your symptoms.
Qtard: Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal?
A 3rd symptom you have exhibited here.
Qtard: \\You dunno anything about my confidential health information\\ See!
No. I don't.
Qtard: Genuinely disturbed.
Qtard thinks stating facts is proof of mental illness? Figures.
Qtard: While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example. Same time to known that someone is mad.
Like you. It is very obvious.
Qtard: Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
That's what happened to you?
Qtard: Because mad thinking they are normal. And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR.
I see you exhibiting that behavior.
Qtard: That was some other your alter-ego?\\ It was something that didn't happen\\ Yep. YET ONE symptom of being crazy.
Thinking other people can see your delusions? Apparently that is a symptom. For you, at least.
Qtard: \\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not\\ Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
You misspelled "evidences". So obviously you are talking to yourself. I agree with what you said about yourself.
Qtard: YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT.
I agree. Why you can't point to any.
Qtard: \\the moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it\\ I see a symptoms in your behavior.
You see your delusions.
Qtard: But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind.
You say. To your alter ego.
Qtard: \\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly\\ Oh, yeah. And you can give QUOTES?
Quote: "Demn Propaganda". Used to refer to facts you don't like.
Qtard: \\So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care\\ Writing in. YET ONE symptom -- low empaty.
Self diagnosis?
Qtard: Problems with understanding even symple texts.
Diagnosising yourself more, yes?
Qtard: ...talking about gay people killing. Why??? Have such urges? Voices talking to you you must kill em?
Diagnosising yourself more?
Qtard: Delusional bullshit?
Sounds like you know what's wrong with yourself.
Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
You have said that. Many times. Compared to my zero times.
Qtard: \\But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments\\ YET ONE symptom. False memories. Envisioning people talking anti-gay.
Reading it. Later remembering reading it.
Qtard: YET ONE symptom -- sponataneous lose of memories.
That is sad. That you have lost your memories.
Qtard: Human Rights is "imagiary"... to a Nazi madman De-Ru-Pun... one who write under nick Dervish Sanders here.
Another delusion. Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" never wrote under the nickname Dervish Sanders.
Qtard: CONFIRM that you are crazy as hell.
You already have. Many times.
Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...\\Of course they do\\ Then... their rights was violated -- by YOU.
Impossible.
Qtard: Who said that they HAVE NO RIGHT to go by the public streets, enter public buildings, ASK public servant legitimate questions.
No, I never said that. Why would I? I'd be talking about something that didn't happen. Proven by the fact that they were arrested. If things had gone down the way you describe, nobody would have been arrested. Logic.
Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?\\ Never said\\ So??? You disavow you earlier claim?\\ Your "I *DO* deny..."???
No.
Qtard: And you agree that only some Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman could say something like that -- "I *DO* deny..."???
No. That was said by a sane lover of democracy. Only a Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman like you would say the J6 insurrectionists had a "right" to overthrow the results of a fair democratic election. Just because they were sore losers.
\\Qtard: What for???
\\Being nuts.
You think people became nut because they coming to psychiatrists? ;-P
Certainly what a crazy junk would think. :-))))
\\Qtard: Normal people do not have symptoms, because of which they need to go there.
\\Yes, but you are not normal.
Naturally.
From a standpoint of such a crazy junk as you are. ;-P
YET ONE symptom.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Means... do you have such symptoms???
\\No.
Naturally.
Crazy do deny being crazy. ;-P
YET ONE symptom.
\\Qtard: Like uncontrollable moronic lying?
\\One of your symptoms.
LIE you never able... and even do not trying to prove.
Which is moronic as it is.
Which is a proof in itself.
Yawn.
\\Qtard: Like spontaneous lose of memory?
\\Another of your symptoms.
Yeah?
And who constantly crying here "I NEVER said it", ah? :-)))))
Ah... I know, not YOU, but some other YOU... out of bunch of crazy junk alter-egos which governing over your body. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Like thinking that other people have alter-egos, same as you, and that is normal?
\\A 3rd symptom you have exhibited here.
Yap.
YET ONE symptom of your craziness.
Using "you" instead of "I".
\\Qtard: \\You dunno anything about my confidential health information\\ See!
\\No. I don't.
Yeah.
You don't see.
Because of histerical blindness. ;-P
YET ONE....
\\Qtard thinks stating facts is proof of mental illness? Figures.
Yap.
Derpy's alter-ego "Qtard" really showing that trait -- saying that one who stating facts (like that that Sun rising in the morning) are crazy.
YET ONE...
\\Qtard: While that is common knowledge -- there is no need to have access to see that someone have a flu, for example. Same time to known that someone is mad.
\\Like you. It is very obvious.
Naturally.
Madman like you would see everybody else crazy.
Yawn. :-))))
\\Qtard: Well, most usual crazy people go meet psychiatrist not out of own decision -- but because normal people who surround em, report em.
\\That's what happened to you?
And whom of your alter-egos you asking that? ;-P
\\Qtard: Because mad thinking they are normal. And that is 100% YOUR BEHAVIOR.
\\I see you exhibiting that behavior.
You see something what cannot PROVE that you saw it?
Like with giving QUOTE.
That is what galucination is. ;-P
YET ONE...
\\Thinking other people can see your delusions? Apparently that is a symptom. For you, at least.
Yeah.
YET ONE apparent case of using "you" instead of "I".
Well... that is known condition -- people with certain type of brain damage -- cannot say "I" anymore.
Seems like that is your case.
\\Qtard: \\Do you? I think the evidence shows you do not\\ Evidnaces? Ones you cannot even spell correctly?
\\You misspelled "evidences". So obviously you are talking to yourself. I agree with what you said about yourself.
YET ONE... apparent using of "you" instead of "I".
Seems like case is closed.
You deiagnosis is settled. ;-P
\\Qtard: YET ONE 100% symptom of being mad -- inability to point to a FACT.
\\I agree. Why you can't point to any.
Yeah?
And that that Sun rising in the morning -- is not FACT??? :-))))
For a delusional crazy junky De-Ru-Pun.
:-)))))))
\\Qtard: \\the moronity you wrote about me being "genuinely disturbed" about my confidential health information being revealed. When you know nothing about it\\ I see a symptoms in your behavior.
\\You see your delusions.
"I" see "my" delusions -- you mean? ;-P
Because it sounds delusionally stupid any other way. You just admitted WITH YOUR OWN WORDS "the moronity you wrote about me"... and then trying to call MY "delusions"??? How can it be???
"Delusion" you can see too. And commenting about.
ONLY with sabsituting that "you" with "I"... it became logical.
Crazy. But logical. Describing delusional reality inside your rotten cabbidge. ;-P
\\Qtard: But mental health... psychiatrists do reveal it through written tests too. So -- your writing idiotic bullshit -- revealing you not exactly in your own mind.
\\You say. To your alter ego.
Oh, yeah. :-))))
Now I can discern it better.
..."I" say. To "my" alter-ego....
As you showed enough with your behavior, that you frewquently loose connection with Reality... and saying that you talk not with me, but with alter-ego of your own... means, with voices in your brain. ;-P
All is pretty damn logical.
Crazy, but logical. Crazy Logic, befirring of such a Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun.
\\Qtard: \\That's you. And you've failed spectacularly\\ Oh, yeah. And you can give QUOTES?
\\Quote: "Demn Propaganda". Used to refer to facts you don't like.
FACTS like that Sun rising in the morning? Or that dRump not in jail?
That is UNDENIABLE facts... you, I mean your alter-ego, disavowing to "believe in"... frequently.
As well as FACTS -- QUOTES of your own words.
Your numerous alter-egos screaming "I NEVER said it".
:-))))))))
\\Qtard: \\So you're fascinated with yourself. Like I care\\ Writing in. YET ONE symptom -- low empaty.
\\Self diagnosis?
Do you think about itself being psychiatrician? ;-P
Quite may be.
Usual thing, around crazy crackpots. :-))))
\\Qtard: ...talking about gay people killing. Why??? Have such urges? Voices talking to you you must kill em?
\\Diagnosising yourself more?
Certainly.
That is YET ONE of Depry's alter-egos have written. Secret Psychiatricain this time? :-))))
\\Sounds like you know what's wrong with yourself.
Sounds like "I" know what's wrong with... itrself. ;-P
\\Qtard: That same "you" that said "I *DO* deny..." em having their Human Rights?
\\You have said that. Many times. Compared to my zero times.
Yeah. I CITED it many times.
And you... forgetting saying "I *DO* deny..."???
While you confirmed saying that... just yesterday.
What a loose bag of shit... your rotten cabbage. :-)))))
\\Qtard: \\But do you? I doubt it. Given your past anti-gay comments\\ YET ONE symptom. False memories. Envisioning people talking anti-gay.
\\Reading it. Later remembering reading it.
But NOT able to QUOTE.
That is EXACTLY what False Memories are like. ;-P
Thank you for CONFIRMING that.
\\Qtard: YET ONE symptom -- sponataneous lose of memories.
\\That is sad. That you have lost your memories.
My condolences... to you/I. ;-P
\\Qtard: Human Rights is "imagiary"... to a Nazi madman De-Ru-Pun... one who write under nick Dervish Sanders here.
\\Another delusion. Your alter ego "De-Ru-Pun" never wrote under the nickname Dervish Sanders.
Yap.
Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun think that other people have alter-egos, which wispering into their ears too... :-)))))
And have delusions.
And... well, re-read all above.
\\Qtard: CONFIRM that you are crazy as hell.
\\You already have. Many times.
But... no trace of that "Many times"???
Because that all are False Memories of delusioinal Crazy Junk De-Ru-Pun. :-)))))
\\Qtard: Like that is YOU have said that J6 "insurrectionists" DO HAVE imanent unseverable Human Rights...\\Of course they do\\ Then... their rights was violated -- by YOU.
\\Impossible.
:-)))))))
"I deny em having such rights" ;-P
\\Qtard: Who said that they HAVE NO RIGHT to go by the public streets, enter public buildings, ASK public servant legitimate questions.
\\No, I never said that.
YET ONE of famous Derpy's "I never said it".
About which it will be crying "I never said it" too. :-)))))))
\\ If things had gone down the way you describe, nobody would have been arrested. Logic.
Because Police cannot break laws???
\\Qtard: And you will not produce more shit -- claiming that they "cannot have such right"?\\ Never said\\ So??? You disavow you earlier claim?\\ Your "I *DO* deny..."???
\\No.
Seems like you do. ;-P
\\Qtard: And you agree that only some Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman could say something like that -- "I *DO* deny..."???
\\No. That was said by a sane lover of democracy.
Yeah.
NewSpeak talking one. ;-P
Which calling totalitarian rule "democracy" in DEMN-speak deceptive way.
Only a Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman like you would say the J6 insurrectionists had a "right" to overthrow the results of a fair democratic election. Just because they were sore losers.
Yep.
Same "Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman"s as Founding Fathers.
Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
Qtard: Same "Nazi-loving Totalitarian Madman"s as Founding Fathers.
I thought they were the fathers founders? No?
This is proof of how dumb you are. The Founding Fathers overthrew monarchy. Yet you think the Founding Fathers would say (about the J6 insurrectionists who sought to overthrow the democracy they founded), "they are just like us". Well, you are a moron.
Idiot thinks the Founding Fathers could have been Nazis-lovers. Even though Naziism didn't exist in their time.
Qtard: Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
They didn't.
Militanz is a 'right" that the Left reserves for itself, exclusively.
‘Militanz’ as moralised political violence has been applied by the radical Left since the 1960s, but has scarcely been defined in academic literature. In the particular West German context, ‘Militanz’ has been restricted to attacks against objects rather than persons, in contradistinction to the terrorist attacks of the 1970s. The Autonomist movement has further theorised this concept through the caveat of the ‘three Antis’ (racism, sexism, capitalism), against which they consider their violence to be morally justified. This article offers a genealogy and definition of this 1990s Autonomist ‘Militanz’ by relying on extensive archival research and oral histories collected within the Hamburg Rote Flora Autonomist milieu. It then interrogates both this concept and the group's claims to moral authority by working within the Autonomists’ own conceptual definition to apply ‘Militanz’ categorically to a riot during the 2017 G20 summit. The article disentangles the various ideological factions who took part in this riot, and challenges media discourses that the Rote Flora Autonomists were responsible. However, it also concludes that ‘Militanz’ as a purely ‘Anti’ stance cannot legitimate moralised violence without offering any affirmative definition of appropriate political action, lest all violence become acceptable ‘Militanz’.
The Right must limit itself to extrajudicial abuses. It's not allowed to operate as the SuperEgo of a political party, like Antifa (and formerly the KKK) do/ did.
It's one of the Democrat's "unwritten rules" (hence the "scarcely been defined in academic literature").
‘Militanz’ as a purely ‘Anti’ stance cannot legitimate moralised violence without offering any affirmative definition of appropriate political action, lest all violence become acceptable ‘Militanz’.
You know...anti-fascist, anti-racist, anti-Trumpist....
anti-Trumpism "affirms" pro-Neoliberalism. Biden-like corrupt oligarchs and controligarchs (ie. - George Soros).
The current counter-cultural discursive infrastructures of the right are also totally illegitimate (right wing blogs, etc.) and made into monsters (racist white-supremacist, facist, et al) in order to mask current criminal behaviours of minority protected political left-leaning racial identities by associating past injustices to a totally unrelated arc of modern political action forged with the sole purpose of legitimizing and seizing a monopoly on current and future political power.
\\This is proof of how dumb you are. The Founding Fathers overthrew monarchy.
Constitutional Monarchy.
One that gave Bill of Rights to the World. ;-P
But... totalitarian De-Ru-Pun DO NOT like people to have any rights... only "protection from violations", from UniParty, yes De-Ru-Pun? :-))))))
\\Yet you think the Founding Fathers would say (about the J6 insurrectionists who sought to overthrow the democracy they founded), "they are just like us". Well, you are a moron.
Yeah.
I am moron.(go, fake-quote it, moron Derpy)
Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
\\Qtard: Tha thave written in a Declaration: "we see it self-evidant..." for people to have undenyable immanent Human Rights...
\\They didn't.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
United States Declaration of Independence - Wikiquote
be.wikipedia.org › wiki › q:en:United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
Totalitarian Liar Derpy tryed to lie about Declaration of Independence.
And why *I* not surprised. Anymore.
Yawn.
And it will start screaming "I NEVER said it" too.
Yawn.
Qtard: only "protection from violations", from UniParty, yes De-Ru-Pun?
You ask your alter ego De-Ru-Pun? It probably says yes. Because it is a Totalitarian like you. Wants democracy in the United States overthrown. Thinks insurrection is a "human right" while the right to life isn't.
Qtard: I am moron.(go, fake-quote it, moron Derpy)
I agree. You are a moron. As is your alter ego Derpy.
Qtard: Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
Why you agree the US Constitution should be chucked, yes? It was written long ago by people who are long dead. And therefore the USA should get rid of it -- make donald tRump president for life.
Qtard: And it will start screaming "I NEVER said it" too.
No. Why would I do that when those are my words? I have never (and never will) deny my own words (as per your absurd lie). What you wrote isn't what the DOI says. Your quote proves it.
But the DOI was written long ago by people who have been dead for many years. So why do you cite them? When (according to you) they can't give an opinion about nowaday cases?
\\Why you agree the US Constitution should be chucked...
WA-WA-WA-WA-WUT????? :-)))))))))))))
Qtard Quote: Because that is ME who said that some long ago perished people... can give some opinion about nowaday cases... oh, shit!!!!
You said we shouldn't listen to the Founders because they are long ago perished. How does that NOT mean you think the US should chuck the Constitution? Given that keeping it would be listening to them.
Or, are you going to disagree with yourself? That was a pretty stupid thing to say.
:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Yup.
Cretin De-Ru-Pun YET ONE TiME confirmed that it naturally cannot think with own head. :-))))))
\\Or, are you going to disagree with yourself? That was a pretty stupid thing to say.
Well...
YOU disagreeing with itself pretty much every time -- saying something, then screaming "I NEVER said it"...
but in your case it might be "showing being WISE"... in NewSpeak lang of idiots, yes??? :-)))))
Qtard: ...saying something, then screaming "I NEVER said it"...
You? I know I never have.
Qtard: ...but in your case it might be "showing being WISE"... in NewSpeak lang of idiots, yes??
NewSpeak language of idiots = Qtardese.
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))
Post a Comment